The Beekeeper's Apprentice
The Beekeeper's Apprentice book cover

The Beekeeper's Apprentice

Paperback – July 1, 1996

Price
$7.66
Format
Paperback
Pages
448
Publisher
Bantam
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0553571653
Dimensions
4.2 x 0.9 x 6.8 inches
Weight
1 pounds

Description

From the Publisher Edgar Award-winning author Laurie R. King Sherlock Holmes meets his match in a formidable new enemy--and his surprising new partner "Rousing...riveting...suspenseful." -- Chicago Sun-Times " The Beekeeper's Apprentice has power to charm the most grizzled Baker Street Irregular." -- Daily News , New York "If there is a new P. D. James... I would put my money on Laurie R. King, whose A Grave Talent kept me reading deep into the night."-- The Boston Globe "Amazing first novel with intelligence, intrigue, and intricacy...This work exhibits strong psychological undertones, compelling urgency, and dramatic action. [Laurie King is] a writer to watch." -- Library Journal "Wonderful: an intelligently and imaginatively crafted novel that's also great fun." -- The Drood Review of Mystery (Editors' Choice of 1994) From the Inside Flap Edgar Award-winning author Laurie R. King again proves her flair for tantalizing mystery in this first novel of an acclaimed series. Long since retired from his observations of criminal humanity, Sherlock Holmes is engaged in a reclusive study of honeybee behavior on the Sussex Downs. Never did he expect to meet an intellect to match his own--until he made the acquaintance of a very modern 15-year-old girl whose mental acuity is equaled only by her audacity, tenacity, and unconventional taste for trousers and cloth caps. Under the master detective's sardonic instruction, Miss Mary Russell hones her talent for deduction, disguises, and danger--in the chilling case of a landowner's mysterious fever, and in the kidnapping of an American senator's daughter in the wilds of Wales. But her ultimate challenge is yet to come. A near-fatal bomb on her doorstep--and another on Holmes's--sends the two sleuths on the trail of a villain whose machinations scatter meaningless clues and seem utterly without motive. The bomber's objective, however, is quite clear: to end Russell and Holmes's partnership...and their lives. LAURIE R. KING won the Edgar and John Creasey Awards for Best First Novel for A Grave Talent . She is the author of seven acclaimed mysteries in the Mary Russell series, as well as four novels in a contemporary series featuring police detective Kate Martinelli. She is also the author of the critically-acclaimed stand-alone novels of suspense, Keeping Watch (recently optioned for film by CBS), Folly , and A Darker Place . She lives in northern California where she is at work on another Mary Russell novel. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. I was fifteen when I first met Sherlock Holmes, fifteen years old with my nose in a book as I walked the Sussex Downs, and nearly stepped on him.xa0xa0In my defense I must say it was an engrossing book, and it was very rare to come across another person in that particular part of the world in that war year of 1915.xa0xa0In my seven weeks of peripatetic reading amongst the sheep (which tended to move out of my way) and the gorse bushes (to which I had painfully developed an instinctive awareness) I had never before stepped on a person.It was a cool, sunny day in early April, and the book was by Virgil.xa0xa0I had set out at dawn from the silent farmhouse, chosen a different direction from my usual in this case southeasterly, towards the sea--and had spent the intervening hours wrestling with Latin verbs, climbing unconsciously over stone walls, and unthinkingly circling hedgerows, and would probably not have noticed the sea until I stepped off one of the chalk cliffs into it.As it was, my first awareness that there was another soul in the universe was when a male throat cleared itself loudly not four feet from me.xa0xa0The Latin text flew into the air, followed closely by an Anglo-Saxon oath.xa0xa0Heart pounding, I hastily pulled together what dignity I could and glared down through my spectacles at this figure hunched up at my feet: a gaunt, greying man in his fifties wearing a cloth cap, ancient tweed greatcoat, and decent shoes, with a threadbare Army rucksack on the ground beside him.xa0xa0A tramp perhaps, who had left the rest of his possessions stashed beneath a bush.xa0xa0Or an Eccentric. Certainly no shepherd.He said nothing.xa0xa0Very sarcastically.xa0xa0I snatched up my book and brushed it off."What on earth are you doing?" I demanded.xa0xa0"Lying in wait for someone?"He raised one eyebrow at that, smiled in a singularly condescending and irritating manner, and opened his mouth to speak in that precise drawl which is the trademark of the overly educated upper-class English gentleman.xa0xa0A high voice; a biting one: definitely an Eccentric."I should think that I can hardly be accused of 'lying' anywhere," he said, "as I am seated openly on an uncluttered hillside, minding my own business.xa0xa0When, that is, I am not having to fend off those who propose to crush me underfoot." He rolled the penultimate r to put me in my place.Had he said almost anything else, or even said the same words in another manner, I should merely have made a brusque apology and a purposeful exit, and my life would have been a very different thing.However, he had, all unknowing, hit squarely on a highly sensitive spot.xa0xa0My reason for leaving the house at first light had been to avoid my aunt, and the reason (the most recent of many reasons) for wishing to avoid my aunt was the violent row we'd had the night before, a row sparked by the undeniable fact that my feet had outgrown their shoes, for the second time since my arrival three months before.xa0xa0My aunt was small, neat, shrewish, sharp-tongued, quick-witted, and proud of her petite hands and feet.xa0xa0She invariably made me feel clumsy, uncouth, and unreasonably touchy about my height and the corresponding size of my feet.xa0xa0Worse, in the ensuing argument over finances, she had won.His innocent words and his far-from-innocent manner hit my smouldering temper like a splash of petrol.xa0xa0My shoulders went back, my chin up, as I stiffened for combat.xa0xa0I had no idea where I was, or who this man was, whether I was standing on his land or he on mine, if he was a dangerous lunatic or an escaped convict or the lord of the manor, and I did not care.xa0xa0I was furious."You have not answered my question, sir," I bit off.He ignored my fury.xa0xa0Worse than that, he seemed unaware of it.xa0xa0He looked merely bored, as if he wished I might go away."What am I doing here, do you mean?""Exactly.""I am watching bees," he said flatly, and turned back to his contemplation of the hillside.Nothing in the man's manner showed a madness to correspond with his words. Nonetheless I kept a wary eye on him as I thrust my book into my coat pocket and dropped to the ground--a safe distance away from him-- and studied the movement in the flowers before me.There were indeed bees, industriously working at stuffing pollen into those leg sacs of theirs, moving from flower to flower.xa0xa0I watched, and was just thinking that there was nothing particularly noteworthy about these bees when my eyes were caught by the arrival of a peculiarly marked specimen.xa0xa0It seemed an ordinary honeybee but had a small red spot on its back.xa0xa0How odd--perhaps what he had been watching? I glanced at the Eccentric, who was now staring intently off into space, and then looked more closely at the bees, interested in spite of myself.xa0xa0I quickly concluded that the spot was no natural phenomenon, but rather paint, for there was another bee, its spot slightly lopsided, and another, and then another odd thing: a bee with a blue spot as well.xa0xa0As I watched, two red-spots flew off in a northwesterly direction.xa0xa0I carefully observed the blue-and-red spot as it filled its pouches and saw it take off towards the northeast.I thought for a minute, got up, and walked to the top of the hill, scattering ewes and lambs, and when I looked down at a village and river I knew instantly where I was.xa0xa0My house was less than two miles from here.xa0xa0I shook my head ruefully at my inattention, thought for a moment longer about this man and his red-and blue-spotted bees, and walked back down to take my leave of him.xa0xa0He did not look up, so I spoke to the back of his head."I'd say the blue spots are a better bet, if you're trying for another hive," I told him.xa0xa0"The ones you've only marked with red are probably from Mr. Warner's orchard.xa0xa0The blue spots are farther away, but they're almost sure to be wild ones." I dug the book from my pocket, and when I looked up to wish him a good day he was looking back at me, and the expression on his face took all words from my lips--no mean accomplishment.xa0xa0He was, as the writers say but people seldom actually are, openmouthed.xa0xa0He looked a bit like a fish, in fact, gaping at me as if I were growing another head.xa0xa0He slowly stood up, his mouth shutting as he rose, but still staring."What did you say?""I beg your pardon, are you hard of hearing?" I raised my voice somewhat and spoke slowly.xa0xa0"I said, if you want a new hive you'll have to follow the blue spots, because the reds are sure to be Tom Warner's.""I am not hard of hearing, although I am short of credulity.xa0xa0How do you come to know of my interests?'"I should have thought it obvious," I said impatiently, though even at that age I was aware that such things were not obvious to the majority of people.xa0xa0"I saw paint on your pocket-handkerchief, and traces on your fingers where you wiped it away.xa0xa0The only reason to mark bees that I can think of is to enable one to follow them to their hive.xa0xa0You are either interested in gathering honey or in the bees themselves, and it is not the time of year to harvest honey. Three months ago we had an unusual cold spell that killed many hives. Therefore I assume that you are tracking these in order to replenish your own stock."The face that looked down at me was no longer fishlike.xa0xa0In fact, it resembled amazingly a captive eagle I had once seen, perched in aloof splendour looking down the ridge of his nose at this lesser creature, cold disdain staring out from his hooded grey eyes."My God," he said in a voice of mock wonder, "it can think."My anger had abated somewhat while watching the bees, but at this casual insult it erupted.xa0xa0Why was this tall, thin, infuriating old man so set on provoking an unoffending stranger? My chin went up again, only in part because he was taller than I, and I mocked him in retum."My God, it can recognise another human being when it's hit over the head with one." For good measure I added, "And to think that I was raised to believe that old people had decent manners."I stood back to watch my blows strike home, and as I faced him squarely my mind's eye finally linked him up with rumours I had heard and the reading I had done during my recent long convalescence, and I knew who he was, and I was appalled.I had, I should mention, always assumed that a large part of Dr. Watson's adulatory stories were a product of that gentleman's inferior imagination. Certainly he always regarded the reader to be as slow as himself.xa0xa0Most irritating.xa0xa0Nonetheless, behind the stuff and nonsense of the biographer there towered a figure of pure genius, one of the great minds of his generation.xa0xa0A Legend. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • In 1915, long since retired from his observations of criminal humanity, Sherlock Holmes is engaged in a reclusive study of honeybee behavior on the Sussex Downs. Never did he think to meet an intellect to match his own–until his acquaintance with Miss Mary Russell, a very modern fifteen-year-old whose mental acuity is equaled only by her audacity, tenacity, and penchant for trousers and cloth caps.Under Holmes’s tutelage, Russell hones her talent for deduction, disguises, and danger: in the chilling case of a landowner’s mysterious fever and in a kidnapping in the wilds of Wales. But her ultimate challenge is yet to come. Soon the two sleuths are on the trail of a murderer whose machinations scatter meaningless clues…but whose objective is quite unequivocal: to end Russell and Holmes’s partnership–and their lives.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(3.5K)
★★★★
25%
(1.4K)
★★★
15%
(865)
★★
7%
(403)
-7%
(-403)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Pleasant Fantasy

I was entertained by this book most of the time but there were some tiresome sections. Much of it was quite repetitive and I felt like the editor needed to have another go at it. I dislike King's tendency (in this book, at least) to summarize what she is going to tell you, tell you, then tell you what she told you. This works for research papers and speeches, not for fiction.
The entire Jerusalem trip was completely irrelevant to the plot. And all it did for the characters was that it made Russell feel "more Jewish". Okay, fine. But how did that affect her in the rest of the book? Seemingly not at all. Why send us on a journey and then tell us nothing about it, give it no relevance?
My other beef was about Watson. Why make him a doddering idiot? I felt that, more than anything, disrespected the original stories. Maybe she felt she had to make him stupid so that Mary could be set up as Holmes's new partner. But surely that could have been done without besmirching poor Watson. He is supposed to have written the Holmes stories. If so, then how can he be such a dimwit? (Okay, I admit, I'm a Watson fan.) Frankly, it would be nice to have an important supporting character in the book. Lestrade didn't really do a lot, either, though at least he wasn't a moron. Mycroft was vague and helpful.
All that being said, and I'm just trying to temper all these "It's perfect!!" reviews, it was fun to contemplate Holmes in a slightly different time and place, and as being not only brilliant, but human and caring. I liked Mary Russell, though she turned into a big drama queen at the end. (Another problem I had - she's been through so much in her life, but one minor bullet wound and she sulks like a Calvin Klein model? It didn't fit!)
Overall, though critical, I enjoyed it and plan to read the next book in the series. After that, if there's not too much Watson-bashing, we'll see.
59 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Pleasant Fantasy

I was entertained by this book most of the time but there were some tiresome sections. Much of it was quite repetitive and I felt like the editor needed to have another go at it. I dislike King's tendency (in this book, at least) to summarize what she is going to tell you, tell you, then tell you what she told you. This works for research papers and speeches, not for fiction.
The entire Jerusalem trip was completely irrelevant to the plot. And all it did for the characters was that it made Russell feel "more Jewish". Okay, fine. But how did that affect her in the rest of the book? Seemingly not at all. Why send us on a journey and then tell us nothing about it, give it no relevance?
My other beef was about Watson. Why make him a doddering idiot? I felt that, more than anything, disrespected the original stories. Maybe she felt she had to make him stupid so that Mary could be set up as Holmes's new partner. But surely that could have been done without besmirching poor Watson. He is supposed to have written the Holmes stories. If so, then how can he be such a dimwit? (Okay, I admit, I'm a Watson fan.) Frankly, it would be nice to have an important supporting character in the book. Lestrade didn't really do a lot, either, though at least he wasn't a moron. Mycroft was vague and helpful.
All that being said, and I'm just trying to temper all these "It's perfect!!" reviews, it was fun to contemplate Holmes in a slightly different time and place, and as being not only brilliant, but human and caring. I liked Mary Russell, though she turned into a big drama queen at the end. (Another problem I had - she's been through so much in her life, but one minor bullet wound and she sulks like a Calvin Klein model? It didn't fit!)
Overall, though critical, I enjoyed it and plan to read the next book in the series. After that, if there's not too much Watson-bashing, we'll see.
59 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The real mystery...

I really wanted to like this book. I was willing to accept some unlikely situations for the sake of a satisfying story, and was ready for a juicy good escapist read.

It isn't that I didn't like anything about the book, but I was disappointed in the missed opportunities to get a better idea of the personality of the heroine. She refuses to discuss the aunt she lives with, though I would have loved to see how a superior mind dealt with a small, greedy one who nevertheless has legal power over her. Her years of friendship and apprenticeship with Holmes rushes by too quickly in a few pages as she matures into a young woman and gives Holmes "apoplexy" with her new appearance. I wanted to comb over those months of association and get a better feel for the foundation of their relationship and the development of her raw intelligence into something more subtle. I think some of these details would have satisfied me more than the little local mystery down at the pub.

The same goes for her time in Oxford. Rather than a monologue about her teachers and the social scene that lays down the facts, dry and flat, I wanted actual scenes, especially of this smarty-pants who hasn't been to school with other people her own age for years having to join an academic community.

I know that details like these may not seem to further the story, but I think they would have supported it. As it is, the real mystery to me was what charm Mary Russell held that would win over a crusty old cynic with a towering ego like Sherlock Holmes. Because I never got a full picture of her, I couldn't like her and therefore couldn't imagine Holmes liking her, either. Their friendship is such a pivotal part of the story that my disbelief really kept me from enjoying the book as much as I could have.
27 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Can't Measure Up

Though this book started on a high note, the second half failed to measure up to the promise of the first half. The plot stagnates, the mysteries are dull at best, and Mary Russell becomes, frankly, annoying. On the last page, when she began to cry, I thought "Not again!" But yes, for the third time in the book she had an overdramatic sobfest and had to lean on Holmes for support. Why is this character so completely unbalanced and needy - she's supposed to be a strong, 20th century woman! Granted, everyone has moments of weakness, but not three huge ones in less than 100 pages. It got old, fast.

Though the book has moments of brilliance, such as the early blooming of their relationship, nothing really grabs at the reader. I'm not sure what all these raving reviewers are talking about. I remember yawning multiple times - there is just no suspense.

It's fun to see Holmes collaborating with a female mind, but not worth wasting your time slogging through the rest of the plot. If you've read Conan Doyle before, this will surely disappoint. Personally, I'm turned away from the rest of the series. I actually bought this book for a friend (a Holmes fan), but I wanted to read it myself before I gave it to her. Now I'm looking for another gift.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A spectacular piece of work!

I read "The Beekeeper's Apprentice" about a year ago. When I first glanced at the blurb, I was tempted to laugh. Imagine undermining the great Sherlock Holmes by teaming him up with a fifteen-year old girl! It was almost too ridiculous to believe. Nevertheless, I borrowed the book from my local library, and since then, it has become one of my fabourite books ever. I bought my very own copy of it three months ago.
The story is amazing. Supposedly written by an aged Mary Russell (a fifteen year-old girl at the beginning of the story), the book is a recount of her life from her meeting with the fifty-three-year-old Sherlock Holmes, to when she is about 19. Her narration, what she chooses to dwell on in her telling, and what she merely skips over, not only reveals to the reader which incidents most live in her memory, but also makes the story fast-paced, and vividly exciting.
The book also shows a quite different Sherlock Holmes to the stories of Conan Doyle. While every bit as brilliant and perceptive, the Holmes we see through Mary Russell's eyes is very much human, capable of mistakes and intense emotion. Much as I tend to idolise the Legend of Conan Doyle, I can't help but warm towards the picture painted by Mary Russell far more than that of the good Doctor.
I was miserable when I finished "The Beekeeper's Apprentice", so much so that I was almost crying. And I have to admit that I cried during the book, too, and still do when I reread it. I have read the other Russell-Holmes novels, but none come close to this, the first. Such is the fate of all but the most brilliant of serials. This is Laurie R. King's masterpiece, her other works cannot compare.
16 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

feminist tripe

I did not know that the legend of Sherlock Holmes could be raped...But she did it. If I wrote a book about turning Susan B. Anthony into a barefoot and pregnant beer fetcher, it would be like this book.

I laughed my behind off at her take on chess. She just don't get it.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

They are Singing Songs of Love, but Not for Me.........

I just do not get it with this series of books....I purchased 4, and have read each of them....but, the characters are not engaging or of interest in an absorbing style....cold....i just really do not get this author .....how the Russell/Holmes books are on the NYTimes best seller list.....I think this author writes at cross purposes.....she has created two characters, who have intersected, and then writes much of what is of interest to her particular interests....read, you will understand what I am saying....Nope....my copies are headed to the Used Book Store to trade in for reading that is of higher and more engaging interest....let's hope!!
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

faded fast

While this book started well, it started degenarating about half way. Holmes is portrayed as very old and slow. He is outsmarted several times by the main villian in the second half of the book. While the idea of the young student is interesting, the general plot and Holmes' energy and strong deduction skills are seriously lacking.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Solid entertainment for non-purists.

Sherlock Holmes purists will, of course, froth at the mouth over The Beekeeper's Apprentice and the books that follow it. This is true of most pastiches. They are, after all, pastiches.
I went into this book with a number of grave misgivings; the premise--retired and aging Holmes picks up an almost-as-brilliant student/partner in the person of a fifteen-year-old girl--doesn't really inspire much confidence. I am /not/ a purist, but Sherlock Holmes is one of my most beloved literary figures and there is a line of interpretation that I really don't like to see crossed.
It didn't help that, initially, Mary Russell (the aforementioned 15-year-old and the narrator of the book) wasn't very endearing. I like a sharp sense of humor as much as anyone and I don't tolerate foolishness well, but Russell seemed, starting off, a little too aware of her own intelligence and therefore a little too disparaging of everyone else's (particularly poor loyal Watson's).
But a funny thing happened as I continued reading--I started to warm to Russell somewhere along the way, and from there things just went downhill.
Most of my liking for The Beekeper's Apprentice comes from the fact that, despite occasional liberties taken, on the whole Laurie King has poached Holmes very well. He appears in the book rather like an old friend, older but as sharp (and as superior) as ever.
Yes, his character is altered a little bit; he's made slightly more human, and more fallible, than the Holmes of Conan Doyle's stores. This humanity is, however, very close to Holmes' character--it reads not so much like an addition or a change as it does like an elaboration on the original, more like a deeper understanding of the man than a deviation.
And as I said, as the book wore on I found myself liking Russell as well. Her voice, narrating, becomes very distinct and unique, and strikes a chord with me (though she probably won't with everyone). She and Holmes can't go for very long at all without snarking at one another, providing a steady thread of amusement through the whole book.
Holmes' brother Mycroft makes a number of appearances as well, which is gratifying. I've always liked Mycroft.
The plot isn't so much one story as a collection of episodes: Holmes and Russell's first meeting and early acquaintance, a few comparatively non-pressing mysteries involving things like some stolen hams and a mysterious recurring illness, a more serious case of a kidnapping, and finally, starting right about in the middle of the book, a tense and convoluted case in which Holmes himself, and Russell by association, are the villain's targets. By the time the last and most serious plotline kicked in, I was hooked enough to be held in suspense and worry over both of the main characters.
The verdict: for people who just can't get enough of Sherlock Holmes, and who can appreciate dry humor and forgive the occasional small liberties taken with the Detective's character, The Beekeeper's Apprentice is a good, entertaining read.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Audacious, ambitious, and almost flawless. 4.8 stars

Many, many people have tried to continue the Sherlock Holmes legend with pastiches and unauthorized sequels. I have read a fair number of them, and most of them are not very successful, even the ones that try the hardest to adhere to the 'canon', or display the author's tireless researches into the minutiae of Victorian/Edwardian London.
So what can you expect of a book audacious enough to saddle Holmes with a 15-year-old American female apprentice/partner/potential love interest? I mean, talk about chutzpah!
But you can't argue with success. This is far and away the best continuation of the Holmes legend I have ever read. It leaves Gardner's "The Seven Percent Solution," for example, in the dust. In fact, to tell the truth, the writing is mostly better than Arthur Conan Doyle's. It is, in fact, the best mystery novel I have read since about a year ago when I went through all of Elizabeth George's stuff.
This novel is hitting on all eight cylinders from the moment Mary Russell, her nose in a book, stumbles across Holmes (literally) on the Sussex downs. I refuse to spoil the scene by paraphrasing it - it's just too perfect. Master and apprentice immediately recognize each other: "When the teacher is ready, the student will appear."
The author unhurriedly follows the Russell/Holmes duo through some smaller adventures into the major plot of the novel, which is correct strategy. The characterization and writing are superb throughout.
This is a feminist historical novel in the best and most successful sense. This is to say that it is not like the many less successful versions in which the heroine is forced to spend all her time arguing about what a woman should or should not be doing, as, for example, in all of Anne Perry's well-intentioned, readable, intelligent, but somewhat preachy works. King doesn't bother with that. Instead, she merely has Russell demonstrate on each page that she is a worthy partner of Holmes, THE partner, in fact, who is indispensible to him. When, in a moment of weakness, Holmes proposes to leave her out of the action, she lays down the law:
"My dear Holmes, I am going to pretend you did not say that. I am going to walk in your garden and admire the flowers for approximately ten minutes. When I come back in we will begin this conversation anew, and unless you wish to divorce yourself from me entirely, the idea of protecting little Mary Russell will never enter your head."
I hope one does not have to be Holmes or Russell to deduce that I am quite enthusiastic about this book!
All right, so why didn't I give it five stars? Well, it is very hard to get that fifth star out of me. For me, three stars is OK, four stars is very good indeed, and five stars is virtually flawless. There were a few flaws in this volume which I finally, regretfully, decided that I couldn't overlook. I think the plot is questionable in the last hundred pages. The Major Villain does too many things just to tease Holmes, and there are a couple plot elements that go nowhere. Also there is some "talking killer" stuff, although you could easily claim that this is necessary to adhere to the spirit of the original, since in volumes like "A Study in Scarlet" fully half the book is taken up by the killer's recitation! The chess stuff should have been left out or at least rewritten with the advice of someone who can play better than King seems to. If this sounds like nitpicky stuff, maybe you're right! The real truth of the matter is that in my rating system this is a 4.8 star book. I'm glad I paid good money for it, I will re-read it, and I intend to read the other volumes in the series as well.
8 people found this helpful