Time and Chance: A Novel (Ballantine Reader's Circle)
Time and Chance: A Novel (Ballantine Reader's Circle) book cover

Time and Chance: A Novel (Ballantine Reader's Circle)

Paperback – February 4, 2003

Price
$14.99
Format
Paperback
Pages
544
Publisher
Ballantine Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345396723
Dimensions
5.49 x 1.19 x 8.23 inches
Weight
1.25 pounds

Description

From the Inside Flap In When Christ and His Saints Slept , acclaimed historical novelist Sharon Kay Penman portrayed all the deceit, danger, and drama of Henry II?s ascension to the throne. Now, in Time and Chance, she continues the ever-more-captivating tale.It was medieval England?s immortal marriage?Eleanor of Aquitaine and Henry II, bound by passion and ambition, certain to leave a legacy of greatness. But while lust would divide them, it was friendship?and ultimately faith?that brought bloodshed into their midst. It began with Thomas Becket, Henry?s closest confidant, and his elevation to be Archbishop of Canterbury. It ended with a perceived betrayal that made a royal murder seem inevitable. Along the way were enough scheming, seductions, and scandals to topple any kingdom but their own. . . .Only Sharon Kay Penman can re-create this truly tumultuous time?and capture the couple who loved power as much as each other . . . and a man who loved God most of all. "In "When Christ and His Saints Slept, acclaimed historical novelist Sharon Kay Penman portrayed all the deceit, danger, and drama of Henry II's ascension to the throne. Now, in "Time and Chance, she continues the ever-more-captivating tale. It was medieval England's immortal marriage--Eleanor of Aquitaine and Henry II, bound by passion and ambition, certain to leave a legacy of greatness. But while lust would divide them, it was friendship--and ultimately faith--that brought bloodshed into their midst. It began with Thomas Becket, Henry's closest confidant, and his elevation to be Archbishop of Canterbury. It ended with a perceived betrayal that made a royal murder seem inevitable. Along the way were enough scheming, seductions, and scandals to topple any kingdom but their own. . . . Only Sharon Kay Penman can re-create this truly tumultuous time--and capture the couple who loved power as much as each other . . . and a man who loved God most of all. " Sharon Kay Penman is the author of the historical novels A King’s Ransom, The Sunne in Splendour, Here Be Dragons, Falls the Shadow, The Reckoning, When Christ and His Saints Slept, Time and Chance, Devil’s Brood , and Lionheart . Additionally, she has written four medieval mysteries: The Queen’s Man, Cruel as the Grave, Dragon’s Lair, and Prince of Darkness . She lives in Mays Landing, New Jersey. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. July 1156Chinon CastleTouraine, FranceAs the King of England crossed the inner bailey ofChinon Castle, his brother watched from an upper-storywindow and wished fervently that God would smite him dead.Geoffrey understood perfectly why Cain had slain Abel, the firstborn, thebest-beloved. Harry was the firstborn, too. There were just fifteen monthsbetween them, fifteen miserable months, but because of them, Harry hadgotten it all--England and Anjou and Normandy--and Geoffrey hadnaught but regrets and resentments and three wretched castles, castles hewas now about to forfeit.He'd rebelled again, and again he'd failed. He was here at Chinon tosubmit to his brother, but he was not contrite, nor was he cowed. Hisheart sore, his spirit still rebellious, he began to stalk the chamber, feelingmore wronged with every stride. Why should Harry have the whole loafand he only crumbs? What had Harry ever been denied? Duke of Normandyat seventeen, Count of Anjou upon their father's sudden death thefollowing year, King of England at one and twenty, and, as if that werenot more than enough for any mortal man, he was wed to a celebratedbeauty, the Duchess of Aquitaine and former Queen of France.Had any other woman ever worn the crowns of both England andFrance? History had never interested Geoffrey much, but he doubted it.Eleanor always seemed to be defying the natural boundaries of womanhood,a royal rebel who was too clever by half and as willful as any man.But her vast domains and her seductive smile more than made up for anydefects of character, and after her divorce from the French king, Geoffreyhad attempted to claim this glittering prize, laying an ambush for her asshe journeyed back to Aquitaine. It was not uncommon to abduct anheiress, then force her into marriage, and Geoffrey had been confident ofsuccess, sure, too, that he'd be able to tame her wild nature and make herinto a proper wife, dutiful and submissive.It was not to be. Eleanor had evaded his ambush, reached safety in herown lands, and soon thereafter, shocked all of Christendom by marryingGeoffrey's brother. Geoffrey had been bitterly disappointed by his failureto capture a queen. But it well nigh drove him crazy to think of her belongingto his brother, sharing her bed and her wealth with Harry--andof her own free will. Where was the justice or fairness in that?Geoffrey was more uneasy about facing his brother than he'd ever admit,and he spun around at the sound of the opening door. But it was notHarry. Their younger brother, Will, entered, followed by Thomas Becket,the king's elegant shadow.Geoffrey frowned at the sight of them. As far back as he could remember,Will had been Harry's lapdog, always taking his side. As forBecket, Geoffrey saw him as an outright enemy, the king's chancellor andclosest confidant. He could expect no support from them, and well heknew it. "I suppose you're here to gloat, Will, as Harry rubs my nose in it.""No, I'm here to do you a favor--if you've the wits to heed me." Themost cursory of glances revealed their kinship; all three brothers had thesame high coloring and sturdy, muscular build. Will's hair was redder andhe had far more freckles, but otherwise, he and Geoffrey were mirror imagesof each other. Even their scowls were the same. "Harry's nerves areon the raw these days, and he's in no mood to put up with your blustering.So for your own sake, Geoff, watch your tongue--""Poor Harry, my heart bleeds for his 'raw nerves,' in truth, it does! Doyou never tire of licking his arse, Little Brother? Or have you acquired ataste for it by now?"Color seared Will's face. "You're enough to make me believe thosetales of babes switched at birth, for how could we ever have come fromthe same womb?""Let him be, lad." Thomas Becket was regarding Geoffrey with chilldistaste. "'As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly.'""You stay out of this, priest! But then," Geoffrey said with a sneer,"you are not a priest, are you? You hold the chancellorship, yet you balkat taking your holy vows ...now why is that?""I serve both my God and my king," Becket said evenly, "with all myheart. But you, Geoffrey Fitz Empress, serve only Satan, even if you knowit not."Geoffrey had no chance to retort, for the door was opening again. Aforeigner unfamiliar with England would not have taken the man in thedoorway for the English king, for he scorned the trappings of kingship,the rich silks and gemstones and furred mantles that set men of rank apartfrom their less fortunate brethren. Henry Fitz Empress preferred comfortto style: simple, unadorned tunics and high cowhide boots and mantles soshort that he'd earned himself the nickname "Curtmantle." Equally indifferentto fashion's dictates and the opinions of others, Henry dressed toplease himself, and usually looked more like the king's chief huntsmanthan the king.To Geoffrey, who spent huge sums on his clothes, this peculiarity ofhis brother's was just further proof of his unfitness to be king. Henrylooked even more rumpled than usual today, his short, copper-coloredhair tousled and windblown, his eyes slate-dark, hollowed and bloodshot.Mayhap there was something to Will's blathering about Harry's "rawnerves" after all, Geoffrey conceded. Not that he cared what was weighingHarry down. A pity it was not an anchor.What did trouble Geoffrey, though, was his brother's silence. Theyoung king was notorious for his scorching temper, but those who knewHenry best knew, too, that these spectacular fits of royal rage were morecalculated than most people suspected, deliberately daunting. His angerwas far more dangerous when it was iced over, cold and controlled andunforgiving, and Geoffrey was soon squirming under that unblinking, implacablegaze. When he could stand the suspense no longer, he snapped,"What are you waiting for? Let's get it over with, Harry!""You have no idea what your rebellion has cost me," Henry said,much too dispassionately, "or you'd be treading with great care.""Need I remind you that you won, Harry? It seems odd indeed foryou to bemoan your losses when I'm the one who is yielding up mycastles.""You think I care about your accursed castles?" Henry moved forwardinto the chamber so swiftly that Geoffrey took an instinctive backwardstep. "Had I not been forced to lay siege to them, I'd have been back inEngland months ago, long ere Eleanor's lying in was nigh."Geoffrey knew Eleanor was pregnant again, for Henry had announcedit at their Christmas court. Divorced by the French king for herfailure to give him a male heir, Eleanor had then borne Henry two sonsin their first three years of marriage. To Geoffrey, her latest pregnancy hadbeen another drop of poison in an already noxious drink, and he couldmuster up no sympathy now for Henry's complaint."What of it? You'd not have been allowed in the birthing chamber,for men never are.""No...but I'd have been there to bury my son."Geoffrey's mouth dropped open. "Your son?""He died on Whitsunday," Henry said, softly and precisely, the measuredcadence of his tones utterly at variance with what Geoffrey couldread in his eyes. "Eleanor kept vigil by his bedside as the doctors andpriests tried to save him. She stayed with him until he died, and then shemade the funeral arrangements, accompanied his body to Reading forburial. He was not yet three, Geoff, for his birthday was not till August,the seventeenth, it would have been--""Harry, I ...I am sorry about your son. But it was not my fault!Blame God if you must, not me!""But I do blame you, Geoff. I blame you for your treachery, your betrayals,your willingness to ally yourself with my enemies . . . again andagain. I blame you for my wife's ordeal, which she need not have facedalone. And I blame you for denying me the chance to be at my son'sdeathbed.""What do you want me to say? It was not my fault! You cannot blameme because the boy was sickly--" Geoffrey's breath caught in his throat asHenry lunged forward. Twisting his fist in the neck of his brother's tunic,Henry shoved him roughly against the wall."The boy has a name, damn you--William! I suppose you'd forgotten,for blood-kin means nothing to you, does it? Well, you might rememberhis name better once you have time and solitude to think upon it!"Geoffrey blanched. "You ...you cannot mean to imprison me?"Henry slowly unclenched his fist, stepped back. "There are men waitingoutside the door to escort you to a chamber in the tower.""Harry, what are you going to do? Tell me!"Henry turned aside without answering, moved to the door, andjerked it open. Geoffrey stiffened, eyes darting in disbelief from the men-at-arms to this stranger in his brother's skin. Clutching at the shreds of hispride, he stumbled across the chamber, determined not to plead, but betrayinghimself, nonetheless, by a panicked, involuntary glance of entreatyas the door closed.Will untangled himself from the settle, ambled over to the door, andslid the bolt into place. "Harry . . . do you truly mean to imprison him?God knows, he deserves it . . ." He trailed off uncertainly, for his was anopen, affable nature, uncomfortable with shadings or ambiguities, and ittroubled him that his feelings for his brother could not be clear-cut anduncomplicated.Henry crossed to the settle and took the seat Will had vacated. "If Ihad my way, I'd cast him into Chinon's deepest dungeon, leave him theretill he rotted.""But you will not," Becket predicted, smiling faintly as he rose topour them all cups of wine."No," Henry admitted, accepting his cup with a wry smile of hisown. "There would be two prisoners in that dungeon--Geoff and ourmother. She says he deserves whatever punishment I choose to mete out,but that is her head talking, not her heart." After two swallows, he setthe cup aside, for he drank as sparingly as he ate; Henry's hungers of theflesh were not for food or wine. "I'm going to try to scare some sense intoGeoff. But since he has less sense than God gave a sheep, I do not havehigh hopes of success.""Just do not give him his castles back this time," Will chided, in a tact-essreminder of Henry's earlier, misplaced leniency. "It would serve himright if he had to beg his bread by the roadside.""Sorry, lad, but Scriptures forbid it. Thomas can doubtless cite youchapter and verse," Henry gibed, "but I am sure it says somewhere thatbrothers of kings cannot be beggars.""I thought it said that brothers of beggars cannot be kings." Beckettasted the wine, then grimaced. "Are your servants trying to poison youwith this swill, Harry? Someone ought to tell them that hemlock wouldbe quicker and more merciful.""This is why men would rather dine with my lord chancellor thanwith me," Henry told Will. "He'd drink blood ere he quaffed Englishwine. Whereas for me, it is enough if it is wet!" Becket's riposte was cutoff by a sudden knock. Henry, the closest to the door, got to his feet; hewas never one to stand on ceremony. But his amusement faded when aweary, travel-stained messenger was ushered into the chamber, for theman's disheveled appearance conveyed a message of its own: that his newswas urgent.Snatching up the proffered letter, Henry stared at the familiar seal,then looked over at Will. "It is from our mother," he said, moving towardthe nearest lamp. Will and Becket were both on their feet by now, watchingintently as he read. "I have to go to Rouen," he said, "straightaway."Will paled. "Not Mama ...?""No, lad, no. She is not ailing. She has written to let me know thatEleanor is in Rouen." Read more

Features & Highlights

  • In
  • When Christ and His Saints Slept
  • , acclaimed historical novelist Sharon Kay Penman portrayed all the deceit, danger, and drama of Henry II’s ascension to the throne. Now, in
  • Time and Chance,
  • she continues the ever-more-captivating tale.It was medieval England’s immortal marriage—Eleanor of Aquitaine and Henry II, bound by passion and ambition, certain to leave a legacy of greatness. But while lust would divide them, it was friendship—and ultimately faith—that brought bloodshed into their midst. It began with Thomas Becket, Henry’s closest confidant, and his elevation to be Archbishop of Canterbury. It ended with a perceived betrayal that made a royal murder seem inevitable. Along the way were enough scheming, seductions, and scandals to topple any kingdom but their own. . . .Only Sharon Kay Penman can re-create this truly tumultuous time—and capture the couple who loved power as much as each other . . . and a man who loved God most of all.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(916)
★★★★
25%
(382)
★★★
15%
(229)
★★
7%
(107)
-7%
(-108)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

An excellent novel of medieval Europe

Sharon Kay Penman may be the best writer around of historical novels about medieval England, France, and Wales. She takes only minor liberties with the facts so her novels can be considered an enjoyable way to amplify your knowledge of medieval history.
"Time and Chance" is the well-known tale of the struggle for power between Henry II, King of England and about one-half of what is now France, and Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The fabulous Eleanor of Aquitaine is Henry's competent wife and Queen. (My picture of Eleanor will always be that of Katherine Hepburn in the "The Lion of Winter.") Henry and Becket, for those who have forgotten the story, are best friends - until Henry appoints Becket as the Archbishop and, suddenly, the friendship dissolves in a bitter Church/State struggle. It's a disappointment that the author doesn't make much of an effort to unravel the mystery of Becket's character. For me, Becket comes across as more of a fool than a man of principle. As one of the characters says "a wise man ought not to let his tongue cut his own throat."
A weakness of the novel is that it begins with a heavy emphasis on Wales and Welsh characters, but Wales becomes increasingly irrelevant as the story unfolds. Don't spend too much time trying to figure out who's who among the Welsh, because it doesn't really matter much in the scheme of things. An effort to comprehend the complex ecclesiastical disputes and sort out the churchly characters in the novel would be much more rewarding.
Criticisms notwithstanding, this is a fine novel, telling an excellent tale about some of the most momentous events of the Middle Ages. A sequel can be expected that will continue the story of Henry and Eleanor and their sons who include Richard the Lion Hearted, everyone's favorite medieval hero, and John, everyone's favorite medieval villain. Penman sets the scene for a little different twist on these two in her next book.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

They Do Not Come Better Than This

I always look forward to a Sharon Penman novel I have not read before, this one kept me interested throughout the book. She has the ability to make the reader feel they are there with the characters in the book, no mean feat.
The book is about the turbulent relationship between Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine. Starting in 1156 the couple have been married for four years. The birth of their sons has ensured the succession to the throne, but civil war has seen the country torn apart.
Henry needs to defend the borders of England against France and Wales, but his most daunting task is his fight with the church to stop them from infringing on his power.
This fight culminates with his one time friend Thomas Becket, whom Henry has made Archbishop of Canterbury being murdered in Canterbury Cathedral.
Sharon Penman is not a prolific writer, which is understandable considering the amount of research that must go into each of her books. This book stands out among historical novels.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Historical Fiction at its best

If you enjoy historical fiction, try this one. The writing is lighter than George (Autobiography of Henry VIII, Cleopatra, Mary Queen of Scots) but the history is there, and for the most part, accurate. Her characters are well developed, and story line interesting. It is one of those books I was sad to reach the end.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Another great work by Penman

This is the second book in Sharon Kay Penman's Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine trilogy. This one focuses mainly on the break between Henry II and Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. I enjoyed this one though some of the stuff about Becket did drag a bit for me.

Two of the people Henry II trusted most were Eleanor, his wife, and Thomas Becket, his very close friend. In this continuation of Henry and Eleanor's story, they now many children, including several boys, and they seem to have a very good marriage. Henry has become close friends with his chancellor, Thomas Becket. Things start to go awry when Henry, against the advice of his wife and mother (and probably others as well), appoints Thomas Becket as the Archbishop of Canterbury. He thought he would have a great ally with his close friend in this position. He soon found out he was very wrong.

The break between Henry and Becket and their ongoing quarrel is well documented in history. While both men were very stubborn, I found that I really had no sympathy for Becket. I believe that he brought most of the problems down on himself. He could have accomplished more of what he felt was "right" if he had attempted to stay friends with Henry. That's not saying that I did not get irritated at Henry for his stubbornness as well, I just never felt anything towards Becket except that he did it to himself. This could be because there really was not much of an in depth look at WHY Becket acted in this way; no delving into his thoughts to see why he thought he was right. Of course, Henry's rash statement of "Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest" is well known to people familiar with the period and Penman uses a variation of this in the novel, though the outcome is the same. Becket is murdered by 4 knights in Canterbury Cathedral and almost becomes a saint overnight. This murder haunts Henry for the rest of his life. He even goes into self exile in Ireland for a while, though he proclaims that he is going to settle matters in that country. In the novel we see a Henry who is upset at the murder and knows that even though he did not order it, the knights thought they were doing his bidding. A lot of his sadness at this point could also be because he knows the blame is going to be placed solely at his feet.

During the mess with Becket, another of Henry's relationships begins to crumble and it is solely his doing. By taking a mistress and actually keeping her, setting her up at the royal manor at Woodstock, he inflicts a deep wound in his wife, Eleanor. I truly felt sorry for her. She had been a good wife to him from the beginning, baring him several children and even tactfully ignoring his other mistresses. Eleanor acts like a queen indeed when she finally confronts Rosamund Clifford at Woodstock (after traveling across the Channel, in winter, while almost at the end of her last pregnancy). If it had been me I would not have been able to act so calm and aloof; I would have torn into the girl. After this confrontation Eleanor gives birth to her last son, John (who most people will be familiar with as the evil King John in Robin Hood stories). After finding out about Henry's affection for this girl, Eleanor begins to drift away from him. This will lead to the final, explosive climax of their story in Devil's Brood. As to the character of Rosamund Clifford, I did not like her. I saw her as a young girl who was dazzled by the King, "fell in love with him," and then kept putting herself in his way until she got what she wanted - in his bed. I wanted to smack her, not only for going after a married man but for her constant sniveling and crying because Henry was not there with her (he was a King after all and had important things to take care of). I don't know why her character grated on my nerves so much but if there was one person in the story I'd want to go back in time and really knock around, it was this silly girl.

We see more of the fictional Ranulf in this story and quite a bit on the state of political affairs in Wales. Ranulf is, again, torn between his loyalty to his cousin the King and his love for his Welsh home. This is the story within the story in this book, even more so than it was in the first novel. Henry and Eleanor's son, Richard, also begins to pop up more in the last 1/3 of the story as well, which sets things up nicely for the last book in the trilogy.

Again, another great work by Penman. While the whole Becket issue dragged a bit for me, everything else moved along nicely. I came out of this one feeling extremely sorry for Eleanor, thinking Henry was a bit blind, Becket brought the trouble on himself, Wales was in trouble, and Rosamund Clifford was a silly little trouble maker. I am looking forward to the last installment in this trilogy to see how Penman brings that explosive climax to life.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

--History in the hands of a great author--

TIME AND CHANCE follows the book WHEN CHRIST AND HIS SAINTS SLEPT.
As the story continues, Henry II of England and his wife, Eleanor, Duchess of Aquitaine have a large family of eight children and share a very turbulent life. This is a fascinating story of two amazing people who have, over the centuries, sparked the interest of historians. Henry, a warrior king, spent months and sometimes years away from his wife and family. His eventual betrayal of his wife and the breaking of the bond that formerly tied the couple together lead them to distrust each other. This couple who began their marriage with hope and a shared bond for the future found themselves at odds with their marriage. They were also in disagreement over the fate of their sons.
The king's best friend, Thomas a Becket is also a large part of the story. Thomas was Henry's first Chancellor and later he became the Archbishop of Canterbury. The author made a statement at the end of the book saying that "the bitter quarrel between Henry II and Thomas a Becket is possibly the best documented episode of the Middle Ages." I totally enjoyed this book and loved the fact that the author tells a great story and even made some explanations about the times when she didn't keep to the known facts.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Fails to do justice to a great conflict

I loved When Christ and His Saints Slept (WCHSS). It stands alone as one of my favorite historical fiction novels. It is so rich, so perfectly written and tells such a vivid and compelling story that I couldn't put it down. I had also heard that the sequel "Time and Chance" is not as good. So, I delayed almost a decade before I picked it up. It is true, this book is a pale comparison of WCHSS. It's not that the writing has gotten worse, Penman is still a wonderful writer who makes you feel plunged into a world of medieval intrigue. It's not even the characters. In fact, all the ingredients are there, and all the events are described with the typical flare that Penman used in WCHSS. So why is this novel not as good? There are three reasons that I can immediately think of:

1). Nothing catastrophic happens during the 20-year span of this story. This is not the author’s fault. She couldn’t invent another massive civil war, so she is limited to border skirmishes, squashing rebellions, and failed invasions of Wales. These are fine, but hardly tell you anything new or exciting. Henry runs around and, in a sentence or two, he takes a castle or sacks a city. He also fails to punish the Welsh because they are so nicely protected by the weather and terrain. Penman loves to point this out, since she is an unabashed supporter of the Welsh cause. Again, I’m not being dismissive but many of these battles are described in mundane and visibly simple terms. Almost as if the author just couldn’t bother much with these events because, they aren’t that important to the overall story.
2). Eleanor. In my opinion, Eleanor is a fantastic character. She is one of the few women in history who pushed back on the chauvinist, male-dominated world. Along with Olympias and Livia Augusta she ranks at the top of powerful women who had direct influence in the course of ancient and medieval history. So, Penman, who respects and perhaps even admires Eleanor, delves deep into her psyche. Many chapters are dedicated to her relationship with Henry and her pregnancies and her travails as she got older. Penman not only humanizes Eleanor, she goes on to justify most of her choices especially during the disastrous Second Crusade. She laments how unjustly the queen was treated and how slander was cast upon her unfairly. I do not doubt that this was the case, but it was Eleanor’s actions and her refusal to follow Louis to Jerusalem that contributed to the failure of the crusade and the effective end of her marriage. Eleanor wanted to be a player in the big stage, to do so she was ruthless, cunning, power-hungry and utterly devoid of any semblance of compassion for anyone she considered inferior, which was almost everybody. This makes her just about even with any of the male rulers of the era, but it does not make her the loving, caring wife who cherished Henry and her children. Too much time and effort was spent repairing Eleanor’s reputation in this novel.
3). The most interesting historical character in this novel is the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. Instead of using him as a fulcrum for the events, for the most part Penman avoids him. She describes Becket from the perspective of Henry and other supportive characters. Penman likes Henry, so as logic would dictate she doesn't really have much good to say about the man who so openly repudiated his “benefactor.” Penmen calls Becket a “chameleon” by her Welsh mouthpiece, and never once gives us the perspective of the archbishop. His motives are hinted and speculated upon but never confirmed. I have to ask why? Why not admit that Becket truly believed he was saving the Church from Henry’s authoritarian encroachment. Alternatively, why not go ahead and make Becket a true villain and portray him as the ungrateful upstart that decided to bite the hand that fed him? In WCHSS, Penman gave both Stephen and Maude an equal share of her literary center stage. Yes, she felt Maude was harshly done, but Stephen got his just due. Becket was not given “time nor chance” to make his case. He goes on to his martyrdom and we are all left to wonder how much better this story would have been if we got a glimpse inside his head.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Fails to do justice to a great conflict

I loved When Christ and His Saints Slept (WCHSS). It stands alone as one of my favorite historical fiction novels. It is so rich, so perfectly written and tells such a vivid and compelling story that I couldn't put it down. I had also heard that the sequel "Time and Chance" is not as good. So, I delayed almost a decade before I picked it up. It is true, this book is a pale comparison of WCHSS. It's not that the writing has gotten worse, Penman is still a wonderful writer who makes you feel plunged into a world of medieval intrigue. It's not even the characters. In fact, all the ingredients are there, and all the events are described with the typical flare that Penman used in WCHSS. So why is this novel not as good? There are three reasons that I can immediately think of:

1). Nothing catastrophic happens during the 20-year span of this story. This is not the author’s fault. She couldn’t invent another massive civil war, so she is limited to border skirmishes, squashing rebellions, and failed invasions of Wales. These are fine, but hardly tell you anything new or exciting. Henry runs around and, in a sentence or two, he takes a castle or sacks a city. He also fails to punish the Welsh because they are so nicely protected by the weather and terrain. Penman loves to point this out, since she is an unabashed supporter of the Welsh cause. Again, I’m not being dismissive but many of these battles are described in mundane and visibly simple terms. Almost as if the author just couldn’t bother much with these events because, they aren’t that important to the overall story.
2). Eleanor. In my opinion, Eleanor is a fantastic character. She is one of the few women in history who pushed back on the chauvinist, male-dominated world. Along with Olympias and Livia Augusta she ranks at the top of powerful women who had direct influence in the course of ancient and medieval history. So, Penman, who respects and perhaps even admires Eleanor, delves deep into her psyche. Many chapters are dedicated to her relationship with Henry and her pregnancies and her travails as she got older. Penman not only humanizes Eleanor, she goes on to justify most of her choices especially during the disastrous Second Crusade. She laments how unjustly the queen was treated and how slander was cast upon her unfairly. I do not doubt that this was the case, but it was Eleanor’s actions and her refusal to follow Louis to Jerusalem that contributed to the failure of the crusade and the effective end of her marriage. Eleanor wanted to be a player in the big stage, to do so she was ruthless, cunning, power-hungry and utterly devoid of any semblance of compassion for anyone she considered inferior, which was almost everybody. This makes her just about even with any of the male rulers of the era, but it does not make her the loving, caring wife who cherished Henry and her children. Too much time and effort was spent repairing Eleanor’s reputation in this novel.
3). The most interesting historical character in this novel is the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket. Instead of using him as a fulcrum for the events, for the most part Penman avoids him. She describes Becket from the perspective of Henry and other supportive characters. Penman likes Henry, so as logic would dictate she doesn't really have much good to say about the man who so openly repudiated his “benefactor.” Penmen calls Becket a “chameleon” by her Welsh mouthpiece, and never once gives us the perspective of the archbishop. His motives are hinted and speculated upon but never confirmed. I have to ask why? Why not admit that Becket truly believed he was saving the Church from Henry’s authoritarian encroachment. Alternatively, why not go ahead and make Becket a true villain and portray him as the ungrateful upstart that decided to bite the hand that fed him? In WCHSS, Penman gave both Stephen and Maude an equal share of her literary center stage. Yes, she felt Maude was harshly done, but Stephen got his just due. Becket was not given “time nor chance” to make his case. He goes on to his martyrdom and we are all left to wonder how much better this story would have been if we got a glimpse inside his head.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Really Great Read

I was so looking forward to receiving this book and was so excited when it arrived in such great shape. Eleanor of Aquitaine interests me greatly and reading these books by Sharon Kay Penman provides a lot of great information.
The book arrived in great shape and in a very timely manner.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A SHARON KAY PENMAN FAN

If you are a history buff and want to know more about British history -- read everything Sharon writes. What a wonderful and entertaining way to learn your history from the perspective of a woman who has tremendous insight into personalities based on what limited information is available from the the annals of recorded history. She not only has a wonderful writing style but also is quite the romantic with a great sense of humor. She does her research -- although has a tendancy to portray her favortite historical characters a bit larger than life. As a result, you not only learn but are treated to a high quality romance novel.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An Important Chapter in PLantagenet History

At times this period in the reign of Henry the II and Eleanor of Aquitaine lacks the drama and excitement of the two books that bracket it: When Christ and All His Saints Slept, and Devils Brood, however it's still a great read for two reasons: it clearly explains the tragic relationship between Henry and his powerful archbishop Thomas Beckett, and also gives the reader insight into the evolution of the royal marriage, which started with passion and partnership, but deteriorated into a dangerous, jealous rivalry.

Penman leaves nothing out in her scrupulous attention to historic fact. This actually helps her as a modern day writer make more intelligent guesses as to what her characters probably said and thought, and is the reason why her books of historical fiction surpass others in the field. For instance, Henry's reaction to the disastrous murder of Beckett, his irksome archbishop of Canterbury, is nuanced by the sadness of remembering that they had once been close friends. When Eleanor turns on her husband, eventually massing Angevin troops against him, it's not so simple a matter of jealousy over his dalliance with a mistress, but a more believable layered series of grievances, both marital and political, between two people who have been monarchs in their own right, as well as husband and wife.

Time and Chance gives crucial insight into the Plantagenet dynasty to be encountered in the next part of this great series, Devils Brood.
1 people found this helpful