Generosity: An Enhancement
Generosity: An Enhancement book cover

Generosity: An Enhancement

Paperback – Bargain Price, August 3, 2010

Price
$25.01
Format
Paperback
Pages
336
Publisher
Picador
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0312429751
Dimensions
5.44 x 0.92 x 8.3 inches
Weight
11.2 ounces

Description

"Provocative . . . fascinating . . . dazzling."—Ron Charles, The Washington Post "An excellent introduction to Powers's work, a lighter, leaner treatment of his favorite themes and techniques . . . An engaging story-teller . . . even as he questions the conventions of narrative and character, Generosity gains in momentum and suspense."—Jay McInerney, The New York Times Book Review "Powers is a brilliantly imaginative writer, working here with a lightness of touch, a crisp sense of peace, and a distinct warmth. . . . Powers shows both his reach as a student of humanity and his mastery as a storyteller."— O, The Oprah Magazine "When written by Dostoevsky, Dickens, or Richard Powers at his best, one may feel that [the novel] can contain every facet of the world."—Michael Dirda, The New York Review of Books "Powers fuses riveting narrative and spot-on dialogue with thought-provoking social analysis."—Dan Cryer, Newsday "One of our most exciting contemporary novelists."—Amanda Gefter, Philadelphia Inquirer Richard Powers is the author of nine novels. The Echo Maker (FSG, 2006) won the National Book Award and was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. Powers has received a MacArthur Fellowship, a Lannan Literary Award, and the James Fenimore Cooper Prize for Historical Fiction. He lives in Illinois. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. A man rides backward in a packed subway car. This must be almost fall, the season of revision. I picture him in the thick of bequest, tunneling beneath the I Will City, the world’s twenty-.fth biggest urban sprawl, one wedged in the population charts between Tianjin and Lima. He hums some calming mantra to himxadself, a song with the name Chicago in it, but the train drowns out the tune. He’s just thirty-two, I know, although he seems much older. I can’t see him well, at .rst. But that’s my fault, not his. I’m years away, in another country, and the El car is so full tonight that everyone’s near invisible. Look again: the whole point of heading out anywhere tonight. The blank page is patient, and meaning can wait. I watch until he solidi.es. He cowers in the scoop seat, knees tight and elbows hauled in. He’s dressed for being overlooked, in rust jeans, maroon work shirt, and blue windbreaker with broken zipper: the camou.age of the nonxadaligned, circa last year. He’s as white as anyone on this subway gets. His own height surprises him. His partless hair waits for a reprimand and his eyes halt midway between hazel and brown. His face is about six centuries out of date. He would make a great Franciscan novice in one of those mysteries set in a medieval monastery. He cups a bag of ratty books on his lap. No; look harder: a ruggedized plastic sack inscribed with bright harvest cornucopia that issues the trademarked slogan, Total Satisfaction . . . plus so much more! His spine curls in subway contrition, and his shoulders apologize for taking up any public space at all. His chin tests the air for the inevitable attack that might come from any direction. I’d say he’s headed to his next last chance. He tries to give his seat to a young Latina in a nurse’s uniform. She just smirks and waves him back down. Early evening, four dozen feet below the City on the Make: every minute, the train tunnels underneath more humans than would .t in a fundamentalist’s heaven. Aboveground, it must be rainy and already dark. The train stops and more homebound workers press in, trickling September drizzle. This is the .fth year since the number of people living in cities outstripped those who don’t. I watch him balance a yellow legal pad on his toppling book sack. He checks through the pages, curling each back over the top of the pad. The sheets .ll with blocks of trim handwriting. Red and green arrows, nervous maneuvers and counter-maneuvers, swarm over the text. A forest of straphangers hems him in. Many are wired for sound. A damp man next to him drips on his shoes. Humanity engulfs him: phone receptionists for Big Four accounting .rms. Board of Trade pit bulls, burned out by twenty-eight. Market researchers who’ve spent days polling focus groups on the next generation of portable deionizxaders. Purveyors and contractors, drug dealers, number crunchers, busxadboys, grant writers. Just brushing against them in memory makes me panic. Advertisements crown the car’s walls: Outpsych your tyke. Want to know what makes the planet tick? Make your life just a little perfecter. Every few minutes, a voice calls over the speakers: “If you observe any suspicious behavior or unattended packages . . .” I force my eyes back down over the scribbler’s left shoulder, spyxading on his notes. The secret of all imagination: theft. I stare at his yelxadlow legal pages until they resolve. They’re full of lesson plans. I know this man. He’s been .shed from the city’s adjunct-teacher pool, an eleventh-hour hire, still working on his .rst night’s class even as the train barrels toward his South Loop station. The evidence is as clear as his all-caps printing: ethics has wrecked his life, and this .uke part-time night job is his last hope for rehabilitation. He never expected to land such a plum again. Death and resurrection: I know this story, like I wrote it myself. The train wags, he pitches in his seat, and I don’t know anything. I stop deciding and return to looking. A heading on the top of his pad’s .rst page reads: Creative Non.ction 14, Sect. RS: Journal and Journey. A heavy teen in a .ak jacket bumps him. He squeezes out a retreating smile. Then he resumes drawing red arrows, even now, two subway stops from his .rst night’s class. As I always say: It’s never too late to overprepare. His pen freezes in midair; he looks up. I glance away, caught spying. But his hand just hovers. When I look back, he’s the one who’s spying on someone else. He’s watching a dark-haired boy across the aisle, a boy with a secret quickening in his hands. Something yellow .oats on the back of the boy’s curled .st. His two knuckles pin a gold.nch by the ankles. The boy quiets the bird, caressing in a foreign tongue. My adjunct’s hand holds still, afraid that his smallest motion will scatter this scene. The boy sees him looking, and he hurries the bird back into a bamboo cylinder. My spy .ushes crimson and returns to his notes. I watch him shuf.e pages, searching for a passage in green high-lighter that reads First Assignment. The words have been well worked over. He strikes them out once more and writes: Find one thing in the last day worth telling a total stranger. Clearly he’s terri.ed there may be no such thing. I see it in his spine: he’ll bother no one with his day’s prize, least of all a total stranger. It’s up to me to write his assignment for him. To describe the thing that this day will bring, the one that will turn life stranger than total. He gets out at Roosevelt, the Wabash side. He struggles up the stairs against the evening human waterfall. Remnants of the day shift still pour underground, keen on getting home tonight at a reasonable hour. Home before the early autumn rains wash away their subdivixadsion. Home before Nikkei derivatives trigger a Frankfurt DAX panic. Before a rogue state sails a quick-breeding bioweapon through the St. Lawrence Seaway into Lake Michigan. At street level, my adjunct is hit by the downtown’s stagecraft. The granite gorges, the glass towers with their semaphores of light he’s too close to read. To the northeast, the skyline mounts up in stunning zigxadgurats. His heart pumps at the blazing panorama, as it did when he was a boy gazing at World’s Fair futures he would inhabit, any year now. Someone in the crowd clips his back, and he moves on. Down a canyon to the east, he glimpses a sliver of lakefront: the strip of perfected coast that passes for Chicago. He has stood on the steps of the fabulous nineteenth-century Palace of Taxidermy and gazed north up the sheer city face—the boats in the marina, the emerxadald park, the epic cliff of skyscrapers curling into the two blues—and felt, despite everything, this place pushing toward something sublime. Off to his left, dumpsters the size of sperm whales swarm a block-long abyss, each over.owing with last century’s smashed masonry. One more angel giant rises from the pit, its girders taking on a sapxadphire skin. Luxury skybox living: late throes of a South Loop renaisxadsance. Last year’s homeless are all hidden away in shelters on the city’s perimeter. Chicago hasn’t looked better since the .re. The place is after something, a .nish line beyond any inhabitant’s ability to see, let alone afford. He wants to fetch his legal pad from his sack and make some notes. Rule one: Get it down before it goes. He’d like to get this down— something about the furnace of renewal, the fall and rise of any given block on the way to this city’s obscure goal. But he keeps to the stream of rush-hour foot traf.c, afraid of getting arrested for suspicious activxadity. He pulls up at the entrance of Mesquakie College of Art, a steel-framed limestone temple from back in the age when skyscrapers topped out at a dozen stories. No, you’re right: those streets don’t really run that way. That neighborxadhood is a little off. The college isn’t quite there; it’s not that college. This place is some other Second City. This Chicago is Chicago’s in vitro daughter, genetically modi.ed for more .exibility. And these words are not journalism. Only journey. His name is Russell Stone, or so he tells the security guard in the Mesquakie lobby. The guard asks to see a college ID; Russell Stone has none. He tries to explain his last-minute hiring. The guard can’t .nd Russell on a printout. He makes several calls, repeating the name with increasing suspicion until Russell Stone is ready to apologize for believing that the job might ever have been his. At last the guard hangs up. He explains with simple scorn that Stone missed the cutoff date. Against his better judgment, he issues Stone a security badge, shaking his head all the while. By the time Russell .nds his room, his eight students are already encamped around its oval table, deep in a dozen discussions. He grasps at once how badly he has mis-prepped. He .ngers his carefully selected textbook through the thick plastic sack—Frederick P. Harxadmon’s Make Your Writing Come Alive. Too late, he sees: the book’s a ridiculous blunder. This group will mock it into the hereafter. I should feel sorry for the man. But what in the name of second chances was he thinking? In the doorway, he tries a feeble smile; no one looks up. He makes his way, head bobbing, to the gap in the student oval. To hide his shaking hands and call the group to attention, he dumps the sack out on the table. He lifts up Harmon, cocks an eyebrow at the group. The copy in his hands .aps open to a highlighted page: Convincing characters perform differently for different audixadences, in different .avors of crisis. We know them by their changing strategies, often better than they know themselves. “Everyone .nd ... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Generosity: An Enhancement [ Generosity: An Enhancement by Powers, Richard ( Author ) Paperback Aug- 2010 ] Paperback Aug- 03- 2010

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(97)
★★★★
25%
(81)
★★★
15%
(49)
★★
7%
(23)
23%
(74)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

blue genes

I like Powers. I really like Operation Wandering Soul, and even though I agree with some criticism of The Echo Maker, I still like that book a lot. It had some pretty realistic characters, some fun dialogue, and a central mystery that kept me turning the pages. Generosity, however, just doesn't work for me. Others have complained about the "creative non-fiction" frame, which doesn't bother me too much, since Power's writing is strong enough to get past it, and the characters are well-drawn and believable enough. Thassadit is a tough character to write and sustain over 300+ pages, but he does it. Russell is believable, as is Candace. But the story just doesn't have any juice. Surprising, since so many of the elements are here, and the theme is about as big as it gets--Powers is always shooting for the moon, which is awesome. But, dude, give me something to grab onto. Nature vs. nurture is great, and genetics are cool, but dramatize some stuff.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Double dilemma

A young girl strikes a big American city like a meteorite. She fled a civil war and, via Paris and Montreal, disembarks in the metropolis. Her radiance and appetite for life transfixes those who have the privilege of orbiting around her.

The circumstances remind us of the real-world work of epidemiologist Aaron Antonovsky who, in the 1960s and 70s was struck in his research by how certain women who had survived the Holocaust were able to sustain a rich and positive outlook on life. Antonovsky reoriented his research to try to understand how this was possible ("Had it been just one woman, it would still have been important to find out why"!) which led him to develop an original and important theory of health.

Also Richard Powers takes this phenomenon as the start for a process of inquiry.
From the immigrant's dazzling presence he conjures two major questions: `How are we to live?' and `How are we to know?'. The novel lets then two sense-making and life-making paradigms collide: the scientific and the narrative. The scientist (or, better, the scientist-entrepreneur) is on a visionary quest to lay bare the order in things and to explore the upper limits of human ingenuity (in sofar as this continues to provide venture funders with a reasonable short-term return). And that includes rewiring our genomic apparatus to "make ourselves over into anything we want". Happiness should not be left to chance; it's a neurochemical design challenge.

For the narrator (or novelist, or mythographer) happiness emerges from a tangled web of relationships. "Happy people have stronger social relationships, more friends, better jobs, higher salaries, and stronger marriages. They are more creative, more altruistic, calmer, healthier, and longer lived." But the causalities aren't always clear. And there are contingencies, and human fallibility. From this messiness and from this abundance of possible relationships the narrator constructs a story, and hence imposes some sort of sense on the world.

The paradigmatic difference between the `objective' and utopian scientist and the narrator who is all too conscious of the inescapable fragility of human life is played out quite literally in this novel. Powers overlays it with another dilemma that is rooted in the foundational problem of freedom. Imposing order is never an innocent business. Narrators make normative judgments. And those judgments may have unwanted or unintended consequences. One of the characters in a short-story authored by one of the protagonists (drawn from real life) commits suicide because he rebelled against the irreversible framing by the narrative. So how to navigate this dilemma between order and freedom? How to write a story of "the kind that, from one word to the next, breaks free. The kind that invents itself out of meaningless detail and thin air. The kind in which there's no choice but chance?"

Scientists have to deal with a similar conundrum. In the hypercomplex universe of genomics, the data are always more or less inconclusive. "Genes don't code for traits. They synthesize proteins. And single proteins can do incredibly different things, depending on where or when they're produced ... " Deciding where to put the line between nature and nurture, between determinism and freedom, is, for the time being, also in science an unresolved issue.

Richard Powers' books invariably are novels of ideas. This double dilemma - between science and story-telling, between determinism and freedom - seems to me to be the philosophical backbone of the book. There are other themes that Powers weaves in with characteristic brio. But at the center remains the young girl for whom the whole challenge of `happiness' is a mirage: "People think they need to be healed, but the truth is much more beautiful. Even a minute is more than we deserve. No one should be anything but dead. Instead we get honey of out rocks. Miracles from nothing. It's easy. We don't need to get better. We're already us. And everything that is, is ours".
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Writing at the juncture of science and the humanities

Richard Powers, winner of the National Book Award for his 2006 novel, The Echo Maker, writes at the intersection of science and the humanities. The reader would do well to have a copy of Merck's or the Physician's Desk Reference handy when tackling Powers' work.

Generosity: An Enhancement, is lighter on the science than some of his past work, but plumbs issues of genetics and bio-ethics. With science as the backdrop, Powers poses large questions in this novel: what is it that makes us happy and how can we be happy all the time? And, even if we could be happy all the time, would this state of bliss rob us of the essence of what makes us human?

At the center of this story is a Berber Algerian refugee, the eternally happy, Thassadit Amzwar. She is a student in a college course called Creative Nonfiction, Journal and Journey. Her professor is Russell Stone, a down-and-out editor for a self-improvement magazine. Stone is an adjunct faculty member at a mediocre college in Chicago. Stone's entire class is mesmerized by Thassa's sunny nature and they take to calling her, Miss Generosity. None is more obsessed with the young Kabylie woman than Stone. He does exhaustive internet research on the Algerian civil war and the psychological literature, looking for studies on what causes people with such a bleak upbringing to be so optimistic.

Stone consults a mental health counselor at the college named Candace Weld, who is likewise drawn to Thassa's sunny aura. Stone and Weld become lovers and both seem under Thassa's giddy spell.

Early on, Powers introduces the reader to Tonia Schiff, who produces documentaries on cutting-edge scientific discoveries for a show called Over the Limit. She is interviewing Thomas Kurton, a renowned geneticist who is something of a celebrity, a more self-confident version of the pop psychologist, Dr. Gerald Webber in The Echo Maker. Kurton has started a biotech company devoted to better living through chemistry, in effect. Kurton's quest is to allow humankind to achieve perfection on earth through genetic engineering.

The first turning point of the story occurs when one of Thassa's classmates attempts to rape her. It is the type of urban crime that may go unnoticed, except that Stone, when interviewed by the police, uses the term "hyperthermia" to describe the woman, whose name is not divulged by the police.

A researcher for Kurton comes across the term during a daily internet keyword search and he decides he must track her down for his study. Kurton locates and arranges a meeting with Thassa and convinces her to undergo a series of tests for his study. Anxious to publish his findings, Kurton refers to Thassa in his study as "Jen." In the second dramatic turn, a classmate reveals Thassa's identity through social media and her email box is flooded with requests, ranging from religious fanatics who see her as some sort of messianic figure to sad sacks who believe she can cure them. Soon, Thassa is an instant celebrity and is invited to appear on an Oprah-style talk show, Oona.

The struggle between science and the humanities is best illustrated by a scene when Stone, Weld and Amzwar attend a debate between a Nobel Laureate and Kurton, the geneticist. The novelist argues that genetic enhancement "represents the end of human nature. Take control of fate, and you destroy everything that joins us as one another and dignifies life."

But, the geneticist pushes back. `For most of human history, when existence was too short and bleak to mean anything, we needed stories to compensate. But now that we're on the verge of living the long, pain-reduced, and satisfying life that our brains deserve, it's time for art to lead us beyond noble stoicism.'"

The novelist concludes: "The misery business will remain a growth industry. When fiction goes real, reality will need a more resistant strain of fiction."

It's hard to say where Powers comes down on this debate. His skill is that he presents both arguments forcefully and leaves it up to the reader.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Bit too Existential For My Taste

My title basic sums up my thoughts about this book. I thought it was something other than what I found from the reviews I read. I will eventually finish it, but it isn't the genre I usually read.
✓ Verified Purchase

A Joy to Read with a Few Missteps

Richard Powers has a unique style that captures the hearts of readers. He creates vast worlds of characters that are vivid and multi-dimensional. Disparate threads of story that seem totally unrelated at first gradually spiral together. In "Generosity" Powers takes on biotechnology, film-making, Algeria, and Chicago among a complex array of other topics. The protagonist, Thassadit Amzwar or Thassa is serenely, supremely happy. For some authors, this would result in a flat, one-dimensional character, but not for Powers. He limits her spectrum of emotions but gives her opinions, gestures, features, and mannerisms that make her real.

There are missteps in this novel. The characters are a bit too clever. Everyone in the book is so smart and sarcastic that one starts to wonder where the idiots are. Also, the number of lucky coincidences in the novel eventually strains credulity. Powers himself jokes about the number of coincidences an author is allowed but it only serves to shine a spotlight on the problem.

But I am willing to forgive a lot. And Powers mistakes diminish the realism of the work, but the work never sincerely aspires for realism anyway. He is perfectly aware that this is fiction and takes full advantage of that fact. Also, had me made the characters more dull or had he removed some of the coincidences, the ride would likely not have been as fun.