Who Gets What ― and Why: The New Economics of Matchmaking and Market Design
Who Gets What ― and Why: The New Economics of Matchmaking and Market Design book cover

Who Gets What ― and Why: The New Economics of Matchmaking and Market Design

Paperback – June 7, 2016

Price
$8.89
Format
Paperback
Pages
272
Publisher
Eamon Dolan/Mariner Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0544705289
Dimensions
5.31 x 0.69 x 8 inches
Weight
8 ounces

Description

“Mr. Roth’s work has been to discover the most efficient and equitable methods of matching and implement them in the world. He writes with verve and style… Who Gets What—and Why is a pleasure to read.” — Wall Street Journal “In his fluent and accessible book, Mr Roth vividly describes the successes of market design.” —Economist.com “In this fascinating, often surprising book, Alvinxa0Roth guides us through the jungle of modern life, pointing to the many markets that are hidden in plain view all around us. He teaches us how markets work—and fail—and how we can build better ones.”xa0— Dan Ariely , author of Predictably Irrational and The Honest Truth About Dishonesty “If you have a market you want to work better, Al Roth is your man.xa0 His new book is fun and compelling—social science at its best.” —N. Gregory Mankiw, Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics, Harvard University and author of Principles of Economics “In a book filled with wit, charm, common sense and uncommon wisdom, Roth challenges traditional economics by emphasizing that markets can often be freer and work much better when they are governed by carefully chosen rules!” —Paul Milgrom , the Shirley and Leonard Ely Professor of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford Universityxa0xa0 “The co-recipient of the 2012 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences introduces what he calls the new economics of matchmaking and market design….Roth’s case studies illustrate how problems that obstruct successful matches can be identified economically and overcome….An exciting practical approach to economics that enables both individuals and institutions to achieve their goals without running afoul of the profit motive.” —STARRED Kirkus Reviews “Practical as well as theoretical. Understanding how matching markets operate can help readers navigate them more effectively. A solid match for readers in general economics and business collections.” — Library Journal — “In this fascinating, often surprising book, Alvin Roth guides us through the jungles of modern life, pointing to the many markets that are hidden in plain view all around us.” — Dan Ariely, author of Predictably Irrational and The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty Most of the study of economics deals with commodity markets, where the price of a good connects sellers and buyers. But what about other kinds of “goods,” like a spot in the Yale freshman class or a position at Google? If you’ve ever sought a job or hired someone, applied to college or guided your child into a good kindergarten, asked someone out on a date or been asked out, you’ve participated in a kind of market. This is the territory of matching markets, where “sellers” and “buyers” must choose each other, and price isn’t the only factor determining who gets what. In Who Gets What—and Why, Nobel laureate Alvin E. Roth reveals the matching markets hidden around us and shows us how to recognize a good match and make smarter, more confident decisions. “Mr. Roth’s work has been to discover the most efficient and equitable methods of matching, and implement them in the world. He writes with verve and style . . . Who Gets What—and Why is a pleasure to read.” — Wall Street Journal “A book filled with wit, charm, common sense, and uncommon wisdom.” — Paul Milgrom, professor of economics, Stanford University and Stanford Business School [AU PHOTO] ALVIN E. ROTH, PhD, is the McCaw Professor of Economics at Stanford University and is one of the world’s leading experts in the fields of market design and game theory. He was a corecipient of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Economics. ALVIN ROTH, Ph.D., is the McCaw Professor of Economics at Stanford University, and is one of the world’s leading experts in the fields of market design and game theory. He was the co-recipient of the 2012 Nobel Prize in Economics. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Markets for Breakfast and Through the Day xa0 Market design is so pervasive that it touches almost every facet of our lives, from the moment we wake up. The blanket you chose to sleep under, the commercial playing on your clock radiou2009?—u2009?even the radio itselfu2009?—u2009?embody the hidden workings of various markets. Even if you eat only a light breakfast, you likely benefit from the global reach of multiple markets. And while most of those markets are easy to participate in, even that apparent simplicity may disguise a sophisticated market design. For example, you probably don’t know where your bread was bakedu2009—but even if you do, your baker doesn’t have to know who grew the wheat that went into the flour used to make the bread. That’s because wheat is traded as a commodityu2009—u2009that is, it is bought and sold in batches that can all basically be considered the same. That simplifies things, although even commodities need to be designed, so that the market for wheat doesn’t have to be a matching market, as it was as recently as the 1800s. Every field of wheat can be a little different. For that reason, wheat used to be sold “by sample”u2009—u2009that is, buyers would take a sample of the wheat and evaluate it before making an offer to buy. It was a cumbersome process, and it often involved buyers and sellers who had successfully transacted in the past maintaining a relationship with one another. Price alone didn’t clear the market, and participants cared whom they were dealing with; it was at least in part a matching market. Enter the Chicago Board of Trade, founded in 1848 and sitting at the terminus of all those boxcars full of grain arriving in Chicago from the farms of the Great Plains. The Chicago Board of Trade made wheat into a commodity by classifying it on the basis of its quality (number 1 being the best) and type (winter or spring, hard or soft, red or white). This meant that the railroads could mix wheat of the same grade and type instead of keeping each farmer’s crop segregated during shipping. It also meant that over time, buyers would learn to rely on the grading system and buy their wheat without having to inspect it first and to know whom they were buying it from. So where once there was a matching market in which each buyer had to know the farmer and sample his crop, today there are commodity markets in wheat, corn, soybeans, pork bellies, and numerous other food items that are as anonymousu2009—u2009and efficientu2009—u2009as financial markets. Just as investors don’t worry about which particular shares of AT&T stock they buy, buyers don’t care which particular 5,000 bushels of number 2 hard red winter wheat they have shipped to them. Thanks to the rating system, they can buy wheat without seeing it. Commodifying wheat via a reliable grading system helped make the market safe. Wheat can even be sold before it’s harvested, as wheat futuresu2009—u2009a promise of wheat to come. This allows big millers and bakers to make their purchases and lock in their costs in advance. They can do so without fear, because the standardized description of what is being purchased means they don’t have to worry about what will be delivered. The purchase of wheat futures is a purely financial transaction, with no wheat even present in the marketplace. As for the transaction itself, brokers inspecting and buying lot by lot have been replaced by commodity traders on the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade signaling and calling out their bids and offers in the trading pits of the open outcry markets that came to dominate this kind of transaction. Nowadays traders also buy and sell enormous volumes of grain while sitting at computer screens. Turning a market into a commodity market helps make it really thick, because any buyer can buy from any seller, and any seller can sell to any buyer. At the same time, it also helps the market deal with one of the main sources of congestion in matching markets, since in a commodity market each offer to sell can be made to all buyers, and each offer to buy can be made to all sellers. So unlike in the market for jobs, or for houses, no one has to wait for an offer to be made to him personally; anyone who sees (or hears) a price he likes can take it. We’ll see in more detail how such markets can work when we look into financial markets in chapter 5, and we’ll see just how fast commodity markets can sometimes operate. Coffee and More xa0 Turning a product into a commodity can affect not just how it’s bought and sold but even what is produced. Still keeping our sleepy eyes squarely on the breakfast table, let’s shift our attention to coffee and its own remarkable market tale. Coffee beans have been grown in Ethiopia for centuries, but until the twenty-first century they were traded a lot like nineteenth-century American wheat. If you wanted to buy Ethiopian coffee in bulk at the source, you had to have an agent there who could extract a sample from deep inside each sack to taste and evaluate it. That changed in 2008 with the creation of the Ethiopia Commodity Exchange. At its heart is a system of anonymous coffee grading, in which professional tasters sample and grade each lot put up for sale. (By the way, there was also some thoughtful market design that went into the rulesu2009—u2009that is, the market designu2009—u2009involved in organizing quality grading. For example, tasting must be “blind”; the tasters can’t know whose beans they’re tasting. Otherwise they could be bribed by the seller to inflate the grades.) The standardization of coffee can actually improve the quality of the coffee harvest. Coffee beans grow inside a “cherry,” and the best coffee is harvested when the cherry is ripe and red. But the beans are sold after being removed from the cherry and dried. So when buyers simply see coffee beans, they can’t tell whether they were harvested from ripe red cherries or from unripe green ones. Before coffee was graded, coffee farmers sometimes were tempted to harvest a whole hillside at once, red and green beans, ripe and unripe. But now that tasters can tell the difference, it makes sense to have coffee pickers pluck only the red cherries and to come back later to harvest the rest of them when they are ripe. Since the graders can tell the difference, the market reliably rewards such care with a higher grade and a higher price. The ultimate result is that foreign buyers can now buy Ethiopian coffee beans in bulk from a distance, without having to taste them on the spot, and from multiple sellers, without worrying about the sellers’ reputation or pedigree. So as you sip your morning coffee, you are benefiting from some fairly recent design in the marketplace for an ancient agricultural commodity, which wasn’t always as standardizedu2009—u2009or as goodu2009—u2009as it is today. That said, your coffee doesn’t necessarily come to you anonymously, even if you don’t know who grew the beans. You may run out to pick up your coffee already brewed from Starbucks or a more local coffee shop, but in either case you know quite a bit about the seller. You may have chosen your coffee joint for its convenience, for the pastries it sells with the coffee, or even for the designs the barista swirls into the foam on your latte. And if you’re a regular, that seller may also know a lot about youu2009—u2009for instance, getting your “usual” ready when she sees you walking in. Coffeehouses try hard to differentiate their products so that customers will want to return and buy regularly from them. Of course, if you’re in a strange city, you may find yourself seeking a big chain such as Starbucks precisely because of the standardization of the drinks it sells, since you haven’t had a chance to locate a more idiosyncratic coffee shop that might suit you better. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • “In his fluent and accessible book, Mr. Roth vividly describes the successes of market design.” — Economist.com? “In this fascinating, often surprising book, Alvin Roth guides us through the jungles of modern life, pointing to the many markets that are hidden in plain view all around us.” — Dan Ariely, author of
  • Predictably Irrational
  • and
  • The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty
  • Most of the study of economics deals with commodity markets, where the price of a good connects sellers and buyers. But what about other kinds of “goods,” like a spot in the Yale freshman class or a position at Google? If you’ve ever sought a job or hired someone, applied to college or guided your child into a good kindergarten, asked someone out on a date or been asked out, you’ve participated in a kind of market. This is the territory of matching markets, where “sellers” and “buyers” must choose each other, and price isn’t the only factor determining who gets what. In
  • Who Gets What—and Why,
  • Nobel laureate Alvin E. Roth reveals the matching markets hidden around us and shows us how to recognize a good match and make smarter, more confident decisions.
  • “Mr. Roth’s work has been to discover the most efficient and equitable methods of matching, and implement them in the world. He writes with verve and style . . .
  • Who Gets What—and Why
  • is a pleasure to read.” —
  • Wall Street Journal
  • “A book filled with wit, charm, common sense, and uncommon wisdom.” — Paul Milgrom, professor of economics, Stanford University and Stanford Business School

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(158)
★★★★
25%
(132)
★★★
15%
(79)
★★
7%
(37)
23%
(120)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Match Maker, Match Maker, Make me a Match.

Alvin Roth is among the few who created Behavioral Economics as a field and freed us from ideological stupidity. He won a share of the Economics version of the Nobel Prize for this and has worked at the best universities in the country. This is an easily read version of his ideas concerning markets. It is completely different from conventional economics and deserves to be read.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great on matching markets but off on slavery

Yeah, yeah, yeah great stuff on matching markets but he misses the fact that slavery creates massive negative externalities and apparently is embarrassed by the fact. You might say it is tangential to his overall arguments but he does invoke slavery and indentured servitude on pp. 199-201.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

simple to read that even someone not in economics could understand

simple to read that even someone not in economics could understand
✓ Verified Purchase

EXCELLENT and fun

Just a nice readable book with lots of good information.
✓ Verified Purchase

Solid pop science

Great book on everything you never learned from Adam Smith on markets.
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

Arrived promptly and as expected
✓ Verified Purchase

Highly Educational and Interesting

An exceptionally well written book. It describes the working of various markets, and in particular the Matching Markets in a simple way. It gives a good introduction to these important topics. I learned enormously from reading this book. As a starter, potential readers may want to listen to Econ Talks Podcast with Prof. Roth.
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

A must read!
✓ Verified Purchase

Markets everywhere

Everybody who thinks about it clearly knows that markets are the best way to allocate stuff people want but cannot have in limitless amounts. It is attractive to believe that markets will just happen and be good, if only you just let them do their own things. It is a kind of “let nature decide” point of view. Markets do seem to spring up no anyplace you get more than a few people exchanging anything. But a functioning market requires rules and constraints. Markets need rule of law and they need some general guarantee of trust among participants, as well as balancing mechanisms so that the strong just cannot take what they want making the weak grant what they must. Many of us learned this lesson after communism collapsed in Eastern Europe. Just being free was not enough. Former communist countries needed to build rule of law and institutions to create functioning markets. Where they failed to do this, the well-connected, the quick or just the crooked grabbed what they could and closed the doors behind them.

Governments cannot create prosperity; only markets can do that. But markets cannot create the stability and trust needed to make possible exchange that will create prosperity. The challenge is to create enough regulation but not too much, to respect natural and organic developments but to put some guide posts around the ostensibly spontaneous order or markets.

I found significant insight into the above in “Who Gets What & Why.” These were often concepts that seemed so obvious that many of us would think we knew them already, but most of us did not, or not in explained the way in the book. After all, the author Alvin Roth won a Nobel Prize for his work. He probably knows something most of us don’t.

When we think about markets, most of us think of the commodity type market, where buyers and selling just exchange based on prices some are willing to pay and others willing to accept. Roth explains markets are broader than that. They are just match making and we can talk about markets in various things w/o money. Roth talks about markets for spouses, admissions into schools and distribution of kidneys, among other things.

Markets are human creations (God created wheat, but the Chicago Commodities exchange defines what it means and what quality) that require rules and procedure and these to a large extent will determine who gets what. In good markets rules are consistent and not intrusive. In bad ones they are capricious and heavy handed, but there are always rules. Markets must be “thick” in that there need be sufficient numbers of buyers and sellers. This is addressed by opening and closing rules. When you go to the farmers’ market, sellers are generally not allowed to open until a certain time and they close at a certain time. This ensures that sufficient buyers per hour will be around to make selling reasonable.

Roth does not talk very much about the market most of us recognize where all you need is money to buy and sell. He is more interested in those where you choose but also must be chosen. This includes things like employment, marriage and college admissions. Harvard and Stanford could choose a freshman class just by raising the price until it left only those willing to pay, but they don’t.
The marriage market is a good example of an imperfect system. There is insufficient information available about the people involved and penalties for making choices in the absence of information. Act too quick and you might end up with someone you don’t like. Move to slowly and the quicker guy steals her away. Roth describes a way we could give everybody an optimal choice. Read about it in the book. Suffice to say that it just works down the lists until all have a place. This system also works for school assignments and has been deployed in New York, Boston and New Orleans.

A money market for kidneys is illegal. You cannot buy or sell a kidney. Each year there are about a hundred thousand people who need kidneys but cannot get them. They have to go through unpleasant dialysis and some dies waiting for a kidney for a compatible deceased donor. A heathy person has two kidneys and could donate one to a loved one in need, but not all kidneys are compatible with everybody. Ironically, a mother is LESS likely to be able to donate to her child, since kids develop some antibodies to their mother’s tissues from their nine-month intimate residency. So what to do? Roth helped develop a type of exchange where you can donate your kidney to a stranger who has a relative who can donate to your loved one. This exchange can involve lots of individuals. So far the largest have include about seventy people

It is worth reading the book just for the parts about matching students to schools, husbands to wives and kidney donors to recipients.

Anyway, I think a take-away from this book is that markets are good and necessary and we have to let them work, but that we live in a market economy not a market society. Government, society and tradition will impose rules and constraints on markets. We need to be careful how we regulate and rule, but we also need to be willing to step in if the market, no matter how efficient, is producing outcomes we don’t like.