Watergate: A Novel
Watergate: A Novel book cover

Watergate: A Novel

Hardcover – February 21, 2012

Price
$26.14
Format
Hardcover
Pages
448
Publisher
Pantheon
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0307378729
Dimensions
6.45 x 1.36 x 9.55 inches
Weight
1.65 pounds

Description

Featured Guest Review: James Ellroy on Watergate James Ellroy was born in Los Angeles in 1948. He is the author of the acclaimed L.A. Quartet: The Black Dahlia , The Big Nowhere , LA Confidential , and White Jazz . I was thrilled, captivated, deeply moved and wholly subsumed by the world that Tom Mallon created. Washington D.C. from '72 to '74 circumscribes farce, tragedy, a reimagining of the political landscape and the reinstigation of grandeur into the fictional body politic. The book is fever dream, wolf whistle and history as plain and simple human longing; the book encapsulates no less than everything. I finished the last page and wept for an hour; I remain stunned 48 hours later. The laughter, the horror, the pathos, the tawdry drama of small people and their fatuous lusts and drives--ever falling short--but, somehow--achieving a transcendental interconnectedness. Watergate is certainly a masterpiece. More importantly, it is a concurrently credible and fantastic subversion of all our perceived notions of a smugly overreported event and an underscrutinized time and place. By casting Richard Nixon as heroic and as misunderstood as the man considered himself to be, Tom has reset the time-lock on every didactic and dismissive polemic and psych-bio ever written about our 37th president. Here, Nixon himself achieves grandeur ; here, he will live as the embodiment of glorious intransigence and twisted courage. “We’re propelled forward and kept highly entertained by the colorful characters, the delicious insider details, the intelligence of the dialogue…What Mallon captures particularly well is the fundamental weirdness and mystery at the center of the scandal…It appears that Mallon’s primary goal, one he achieves with great finesse, is to make the portrayals of his characters as believable as possible.” – New York Times Book Review “In [Mallon’s] practiced hands—this is not his first fling at historical fiction—the festering mess of 1972-74 becomes almost fun, actually funny, and instructive about how history can be knocked sideways by small mediocrities…Mallon uses his literary sensibility and mordant wit to give humanity to characters who in their confusions and delusions staggered across the national stage…let Mallon be your archaeologist, excavating a now distant past that reminds us that things could be very much worse. They once were.” –George Will,xa0Washington Post “ Watergate manages to combine extensive research with the tools of fiction to provide a new perspective on an iconic episode in American history. It is sufficiently faithful to the facts to offer a compelling introduction for those who missed this astounding story as it unfolded in the early 1970s, and a fresh view for those who haven't thought about it in years… Watergate is the sort of book that will ensnare you in its web of intrigue…Mallon manages to deftly capture the peculiar mix of unbridled ambition, bumbling ineptitude, hubris, cluelessness and dishonesty that sparked such an all-consuming crisis in American government.” –NPR.org “In this stealth bull’s-eye of a political novel, Mr. Mallon invests the Watergate affair with all the glitter, glamour, suave grace and subtlety that it doesn’t often receive. Written with the name-dropping panache of a Hollywood tell-all, it seamlessly embellishes reportage with fiction.” –Janet Maslin , New York Times 10 Favorite Books of 2012xa0 “Mesmerizing …While clarifying the maze of connections among elected officials, political advisers, cronies and assorted power-mad or ideologically driven Nixonites, Mallon keeps the narrative moving at thriller-novel pace. Yet his writing always soars far above that genre's cliches…Like the best historical novelists, Mallon uses great public events as superstructure for classic themes of ambition and power, rivalry and envy, love lost and yearned for. In this sense, Watergate succeeds brilliantly. Like them or not, these tormented characters throb with life.” – Newsday “Fiction of a remarkably high order…Fiction, to be sure. But just as acceptable as any of the factual explanations history has left us with.” – Washington Times "It already can be said with some certainty that no Watergate retread will be as imaginative or as entertaining as Watergate: xa0A Novel …Mallon, a master of the genre knows the dance between history and fiction…Full of telling, vivid detail…Mallon gets each of the characters with perfect pitch." – The Boston Globe "A pleasurably perverse and darkly comedic thriller…a beguilingly intricate structure." – The Seattle Times "An entertaining and surprisingly touching look at the 37th president's self-inflicted downfall… Watergate is finely polished. Gore Vidal and E. L. Doctorow were instrumental in resuscitating the historical novel genre in this country.xa0Now that their best days are past, it is comforting to know that the patient is thriving in Dr. Mallon's capable hands." – The Miami Herald "Brashly entertaining…Though thoroughly based on fact, this is unrepentantly a work of fiction…[Mallon's] characters still have the ability to shock. He regards them with humor but also with compassion, as their plans and hopes are ruined by chance and unruly human emotions." – The Columbus Dispatch “An observant and interior study of power and how men and women manipulate it differently... a product of thorough research.” –Barnes and Noble.com“A clever comic novel…Imaginative fiction can tell a deeper truth than writing that sticks to demonstrable fact.” – Slate “If ever a historical event was worthy of a comic novel, it’s Watergate, and Mallon, with several outstanding historical novels to his credit (most recently, Fellow Travelers ), has the skills to write it. What a cast of characters we meet!...Mallon writes with such swagger that it all seems new again. A sure winner, for its subject and Mallon’s proven track record as a historical novelist, and because it’s good.” – Library Journal “Revisiting the history of the ’70s with our favorite cast of characters…While billed as a novel,xa0this book reads more like a documentary of a fascinating yet unlamented time.” – Kirkus “It’s a brilliant presentation, subtle and sympathetic but spiked with satire that captures [Nixon] in all his crippling self-consciousness, his boundless capacity for self-pity and re-invention…Mallon writes with such wit and psychological acuity as he spins this carousel of characters caught in a scandal that’s constantly fracturing into new crises.” –Washington Post “In this stealth bull’s-eye of a political novel, Thomas Mallon invests the Watergate affair with all the glitter, glamour, suave grace and subtlety that it doesn’t often get.” –New York Times “Mallon, astute and nimble, continues his scintillating, morally inquisitive journey through crises great and absurd in American politics by taking on Watergate…Mallon himself is deliciously witty. But it is his political fluency and unstinting empathy that transform the Watergate debacle into a universal tragicomedy of ludicrous errors and malignant crimes, epic hubris and sorrow.” –Booklist, starred review “ Mallon would seem to have the right mix of historical understanding and fresh whimsy to portray the craziness that was Watergate.” –Library Journal Seasonal Roundup “Fascinating reading—and a surprisingly sympathetic treatment of Richard M. Nixon—it’s tough to top an account that features regular appearances by the tart and imperious Alice Roosevelt Longworth. Bonus: the author’s version of how (and why) those 18½ minutes of Oval Office tapes got erased.” – St. Louis Post-Dispatch “Within the framework of the true, Mallon also has to find the plausible, which he has done in satisfying ways… Mallon renders the era, the people and the place in vivid detail.” –Los Angeles Times “It is perhaps the unique accomplishment of Watergate, the excellent new novel by Thomas Mallon, to depict Nixon not as a moral to a story, a symptom of political pathology, or a walking character flaw, but as a man…The great reward in reading this wise and thoughtful and subtle novel is that it reminds us that our leaders are only human beings.” –Washington Monthly “A master of the historical novel turns Watergate into a dark comedy, rotating point of view among the supporting cast, with Nixon as a sort of Malvolio—comical, pitiable, tragic.” – Newsweek, The Daily Beast “ Watergate is the fruit of canny artistic decisions that transform the crude fabric of bygone events into the stuff of fine—and fun—historical fiction…The author inhabits each of the characters with careful attention, deft humor and unstinting sympathy, mimicking habits of mind, foregrounding preoccupations and sketching in life stories as he moves the action forward.” – Washington Independent Review of Books “ Watergate feels true, even in the places that it might not be. More important, it's wildly entertaining from beginning to end, a compelling evocation of tragedy and farce, much like the scandal itself.” – Fort Worth Star Telegram “This fictionalized version of the events surrounding the 1972 Watergate break-in proves that truth is at least as interesting as fiction, if sometimes even more incredible.” – Christian Science Monitor , 10 novels to watch for in 2012“Entertaining and warm-hearted.” – USA Today “It’s a testament to Mallon’s skill that he is able to balance the comedy and the tragedy, to show just how tragic these events must have seemed to their actors without ever letting us forget how farcical they appear with the benefit of hindsight… Watergate is a delightful novel—well written, well paced, and enjoyable. It achieves the main goal of historical fiction: it shows us just how strange, and how completely familiar, the past can be.” – Commonweal Magazine “The ruthless, paranoid, sometimse farcically inept architects of America’s biggest political scandal seem more colorfully real than ever in this fictional portrayal.” – O Magazine “Terrific…Mallon’s major achievement as he takes us from the eve of the break-in to Nixon’s resignation is to turn the scandal’s real-life players from yesteryear’s TV gargoyles into human beings…Two cheers for nostalgia.” – American Prospect &... Thomas Mallon is the author of eight novels, including Henry and Clara, Dewey Defeats Truman, and Fellow Travelers, and seven works of nonfiction. He is a frequent contributor to The New Yorker and The New York Times Book Review, among other publications. He lives in Washington, D.C. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. In her room inside the czar’s apartments, Pat Nixon, jet-lagged at 4:30 a.m., lay awake and looked toward a crack in the velvet curtains. The White Nights wouldn’t really come for another month, and Moscow wasn’t Leningrad, but the glow outside had nothing to do with dawn. It was the same strange silvery light that had persisted all night and been shining even when the state dinner ended at ten- thirty. The sky reminded her, oddly enough, of the ones she used to walk beneath in the Bronx on rainy autumn twilights back in the early thirties, looking south toward Manhattan. She’d leave the X- ray machine she’d tended all day and, with her coat pulled tight and never more than a dollar in her pocket, head down Johnson Avenue in search of dinner, often just a slice of apple pie and coffee. She could no longer remember the names of the nuns she’d lived with atop the TB hospital, but could still recall what she would think while walking on nights that looked like this one: Maybe I won’t try to get back to California; maybe I’ll seek my life right here.xa0She wondered whether Mrs. Khrushchev, now a widow, still lived in the dacha she and Dick had lunched at back in ’59. There was probably no more chance of her having been allowed to keep it than there had been of her being at the dinner tonight. When Pat had raised that second possibility with Kissinger, he’d pompously informed her that it was out of the question, and that she should be grateful for the political progress signified by Nikita Khrushchev’s having been merely retired instead of shot.xa0What a show Mrs. K had made, a dozen years ago, of not trying on the hat that Pat and the other ladies had presented her with at a luncheon in Washington, when the Khrushchevs returned the Nixons’ visit to Russia. She’d said she would accept the hat only so that back home it could be copied for the masses of Soviet women! Oh, put it on, dear, they’d all cajoled, and they eventually did succeed in raising a smile from her plump face. But, no, they never saw her try it on.xa0The Soviets had certainly never given up any of the swag in this room. Pat decided she might as well get up, put on the lights, and give it another look instead of just lying here staring at the curtains and gold- leaf ceiling. But on her way to the mosaic table, the one supporting the beautiful French clock, she stumbled over an extension cord left by Rita, her hairdresser, who’d fought a losing battle with the different voltage until two young men from Kissinger’s staff got the dryer going just before they were all due downstairs for the first toasts. Was Rita—across the courtyard in the block of rooms supposed to be full of ramshackle Communist-era furnishings— getting any more sleep than she was? Poor Bill Rogers wasn’t even inside the Kremlin; he’d been put in some hotel a few minutes away, no doubt from Kissinger’s continuing need to keep the secretary of state in his place and away from the real action.xa0It bothered her that Dick encouraged all that, especially if he did it not for some strategic reason but out of resentment left over from their six years in New York, when Bill and Adele would invite the Nixons out to “21” and give the impression—at least to Dick—that the Rogerses were doing them a favor. Pat herself had never seen it that way. She remembered those evenings, as well as the law firm’s partner dinners from that same all- too- brief time in her life, as being more agreeable than all the political entertainments in the years before and after.xa0Even Martha, for a while, had been fun.xa0How Rose Woods would love this room: all the figurines and bibelots, the kind of stuff she filled her little place at the Watergate with, those frilly knockoffs amidst the real little gems she got from Don Carnevale, her very safe escort from Harry Winston.xa0She heard voices coming from the courtyard below, bouncing up off the paving stones. Dear God, it was—Dick. She parted the curtains and saw him down there in a windbreaker and slacks, walking with Bill Duncan, their favorite Secret Service man, and she thought back to the mad night two years ago when he’d gone to the Lincoln Memorial, at about this hour, with almost nobody but Manolo and some aide of John Ehrlichman’s. To talk with the “demonstrators.” And a fat lot of credit he’d got for making the effort. xa0She thought of the people who’d come out to greet them this afternoon, trying to catch a glimpse of the limousine. You could scarcely see them, kept back as they were a block or more from the path of the car, but you could hear them, buzzing and cheering, interested in the wholexa0thing, hoping for something to come out of it— whereas back home the only crowds you could gather for politics were the angry, filthy kids and their teachers. Would those same protesters now grudgingly admit that the “warmonger” was really a peacemaker? No, of course not.xa0She could see Dick now, staying two steps ahead of Duncan, lost in thought until he’d turn around and say something, half from politeness and half from the need to hold forth. And then, after he spoke a couple of sentences, he’d break away and go it alone for another fifty feet, starting the cycle again. For all his need of an audience, he was happier alone. She remembered him just like this on their wedding day, June 21, 1940. She’d looked out the window of the Mission Inn and spotted him pacing the courtyard, a nervous groom, an hour before the ceremony. The birds had been singing in the branches as she stood there in her lace suit from Robinson’s department store and watched him without his knowing it. Money had been so much on both their minds: his mother had made the cake; his brother had picked her up and brought her to Riverside to save the cost of a hired car.xa0Next month, June, would be their anniversary. What would Rose be buying for him to give her? Once this trip was over and the two women had a quiet moment together, she’d have to start dropping hints. Dick had lately been making all this odd conversation about a “dynasty.” David would run for Congress from Pennsylvania; or maybe Julie would. And both Eds, his son- in- law and much younger brother, would find open seats in New York and Washington state. This fantasy was new, another one agitated into life by too much concentration on the Kennedys. She herself never inclined to the long view.xa0Julie had taken to asking when she would have her portrait for the White House painted. “When I can find the time” was her usual answer, easier than saying what she really thought: that sitting for it in the first term would be bad luck.xa0She could hear Dick’s voice growing fainter. Poor Bill Duncan would be relieved when his boss decided to go back to bed. Maybe she, too, was at last ready for sleep; if she got lucky, she would drift off for a couple of hours before breakfast.xa0She closed the curtains and undid the long belt of her wrapper, jumping in fright when her hand brushed, and nearly knocked over, a porcelain figure on the largest chest of drawers. No harm done, thank God. Everything, the whole world, really, was so fragile. Only yesterdayxa0there had been that horrible newspaper picture of the man attacking the Pietà with a hammer.xa0She knew from long practice that she could, by sheer force of will, banish such an awful image from her mind. As she closed her eyes, she did just that. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • From one of our most esteemed historical novelists, a remarkable retelling of the Watergate scandal, as seen through a kaleidoscope of its colorful perpetrators and investigators. For all the monumental documentation that Watergate generated—uncountable volumes of committee records, court transcripts, and memoirs—it falls at last to a novelist to perform the work of inference (and invention) that allows us to solve some of the scandal’s greatest mysteries (who
  • did
  • erase those eighteen-and-a-half minutes of tape?) and to see this gaudy American catastrophe in its human entirety.  In
  • Watergate,
  • Thomas Mallon conveys the drama and high comedy of the Nixon presidency through the urgent perspectives of seven characters we only thought we knew before now, moving readers from the private cabins of Camp David to the klieg lights of the Senate Caucus Room, from the District of Columbia jail to the Dupont Circle mansion of Theodore Roosevelt’s sharp-tongued ninety-year-old daughter (“The clock is dick-dick-dicking”), and into the hive of the Watergate complex itself, home not only to the Democratic National Committee but also to the president’s attorney general, his recklessly loyal secretary, and the shadowy man from Mississippi who pays out hush money to the burglars. Praised by Christopher Hitchens for his “splendid evocation of Washington,” Mallon achieves with
  • Watergate
  • a scope and historical intimacy that surpasses even what he attained in his previous novels, as he turns a “third-rate burglary” into a tumultuous, first-rate entertainment.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(99)
★★★★
25%
(82)
★★★
15%
(49)
★★
7%
(23)
23%
(76)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

WOW!

With all that's been discovered, exposed, reported and chronicled on Watergate, writing yet another book, let alone a novel on this scandal seems an arduous if not impossible task. We all have our opinions and memories; our tally of the good guys and bad guys; and even a list of "What ifs?" All true, but Thomas Mallon's book is both fascinating and scary - not Hitchcock Psycho scary - but scary in how "real" this novel reads - regardless if it is "fiction".

The author uses an interesting mix of narrators - some well-known, some not so much - to tell the "story" of this third rate burglary, its aftermath and the subsequent downfall and resignation of President Richard Nixon. We meet Howard Hunt, ex-CIA, one of the burglars and maybe a little mentally unbalanced. Fred LaRue, good friend of John Mitchell, presidential aide and White House "bag-man". The First Lady Pat Nixon and Presidential Secretary Rose Mary Woods - both of these women exceptionally well developed in this book. Alice Roosevelt Longworth, the elderly first daughter of Theodore Roosevelt, acerbic, still mentally sharp and the only one who seems to be able to connect the tragic dots of this scandal. (Alice nicknames John Dean the TST - the tortoise shell(ed) tattler.)

Elliot Richardson, the attorney general removed during "The Saturday Night Massacre" - and former Secretary of Defense, HEW and Undersecretary of State - spends some time in the spotlight, and is on the receiving end of a few barbs. (I don't know much of Richardson's "history" to make a call, but that he is presented here as "opportunistic" is an understatement.) John and Martha Mitchell also each play a role - Mr. Mitchell, Nixon confidante, former AG, head of CREEP, and the long suffering husband who took his eye off the ball; Mrs. Mitchell, the intoxicated, shrill, and wildly indiscreet elephant in the room and on the phone. And of course at the center of all this is Richard Nixon, who although not portrayed sympathetically by any means, is still very human here.

Just as fascinating are some of the players given bit parts in the novel. (Maybe because they're still alive, but there seems to be more to the lack of attention here than that.) G. Gordon Liddy is never on center stage and is off-handedly referred to by several of the above as a macho, overzealous, incompetent buffoon. Henry Kissinger pops in and out of the narrative - usually obsequious and insecure when he does. And just to keep the reader on his or her toes, there are several fictional characters; one of which adds a whole new dimension to Pat Nixon.

I found this an extraordinary book - maybe a tad long, but I'm not smart enough to identify what's not needed - and one where you rarely, if ever, feel the presence of the author. Not an easy task when you think about it. The only caveat I have is the amount of Watergate knowledge one brings to this book. Mallon drops the reader right into the deep end of the pool with his novel, and even with a fair bit of Watergate lore in my head I had to refer to Wikipedia several times. Still well worth the read and one folks will be talking about for some time to come.
64 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Third Rate Burglary

Fiction as history seems like a contradiction in terms. In the Author's Note to Harlot's Ghost, Norman Mailer suggests the opposite: "Novelists have a unique opportunity - they can create superior histories out of an enhancement of the real, the unverified and the wholly fictional." In Watergate, Thomas Mallon admits to "enhancing" the real especially in the case of main character Fred LaRue. The reader must decide if such enhancement reveals or obscures.

Mallon's narrative technique is an interesting one. Eschewing almost all of the best known Watergate locales (the Senate hearings, Executive Office discussions, the Washington Post newsroom, etc), the author follows the unraveling scandal in the stories of second or third level participants. The moral dilemma of John Mitchell's bagman Fred LaRue is portrayed as is that of Saturday Night Massacre victim Elliot Richardson. Less attention is paid to Richard Nixon than to wife Pat (who is finally humanized by Mallon) and to Secretary Rose Mary Woods (whom the author cannot help). The marriages of John and Martha Mitchell and of Howard and Dorothy Hunt take center stage. Most interestingly, Nixon confidant and daughter of Teddie Roosevelt Alice Longworth brings historical continuity to this retold tale.

I was a Watergate junkie in the seventies. I detested Nixon and, recovering from a leg broken playing baseball, I watched the Ervin hearings live each day and parts of the replay in the evening. Even so, there is much that is new to me in Mallon's book. The problem may be for those readers who are not overly familiar with all that transpired in the early seventies. The structure of the novel assumes the reader knows what is happening offstage where, in fact, the most significant Watergate actions occur. This may make the book challenging for the casual reader.

With that caveat, I recommend this book as morality tale and effective political journalism. We once again watch amazed as an administration fritters away the most one-sided presidential election victory in history through a combination of paranoia, moral ambivalence, incompetence and bad luck. Concerned with a fantasy that Fidel Castro may be funding the DNC, the Committee to Re-Elect the President places listening devices in Democratic party headquarters and then returns to check them at a later date. The government unravels from there and the most powerful men in the world end up in prison except the President whose pardon dooms his party's chances in the next election cycle. Through all of this, no one in the administration ever ponders what the moral path should be. Jeb Magruder tells LaRue: "You know, Fred, we're not covering up a burglary, we're safeguarding world peace."

It is said that prostitutes and ugly buildings become respectable if they survive long enough for public perception to sentimentalize the object of scorn. The same may be said about errant politicians. Nixon's image seemed to improve as he aged out of the public eye and as memories of the greatest scandal in American political history faded. Mallon's book, like the movie Frost/Nixon, is an effective antidote to the tendency to forget and thus to sanitize the past.
30 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointing...

I lived through Watergate. I remember rushing home from work to read the latest newspaper accounts and watch Dean, Haldeman and Erlichman testify before the Ervin Senate Watergate Committee. It was an exciting albeit troubling time in our history. Mallon manages to squeeze the excitement out of this exciting and intriguing event. In this novel the events of Watergate are on background. You might say 'deep background.' In place of political intrigue we are fed boring characterizations of people largely peripheral to the guts of the Watergate story - Fred LaRue, Pat Nixon, Rosemary Woods and Alice Roosevelt Longworth. Very disappointing!
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Tragic

What can I say - at the halfway point I just couldn't muster the strength to go on. Looking at reviews here, 2 themes resonate with my feelings about this book:

1) You need to have a good understanding of Watergate to follow and enjoy this.
2) It's tragically dull. Even many of those who lived through the events of the day felt this way.

I also felt this was more like reading People Magazine than a historical fiction. If I cared about the extracurricular sleeping habits of the rich and famous, I would spend more time with People.

I don't like giving 1-star ratings; I reserve them for the very special class of books that drain the will to continue from my very soul. Watergate: A Novel - for me - is eminently qualified for this honor.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

gimmicky and apolitical

Watergate feels like a cheat. The characters you want to learn most about, esp. Nixon, remain completely opaque. Mallon places a lot of the personality weight of the novel on a handful of female characters - Pat Nixon, Rose Mary Woods, Mrs. Alice Roosevelt Longworth (daughter of Teddy Roosevelt)- but these characters are just People Magazine representations of themselves. They are like stock characters in a soap opera. Pat Nixon is the most developed character and she is not even involved in Watergate! It's as if she's stumbled into a novel that doesn't belong to her, and she doesn't belong to it. (Maybe that's how she felt in real life.)

The story proceeds more like a screenplay for a TV series, of the tantalizing but ultimately disappointing sort because there's no sex, no psychological depth, just another tawdry set of personal stories about silly ambitious people who have foibles that trip them up. The final revelation - the opening of the envelope - makes the whole show of Watergate to be a bad joke, a mistake instigated by a confusion between the name "Larrie" and the name "Larry". That's the answer to Watergate: a silly mistake that should never have happened but for a drunken night between two alienated politicos.

That Nixon should remain such a non-entity in this novel - that bothers me the most. He's more sinned against than sinning here. The whole Cuban angle is merely hinted at, and trivialized. The paranoid hatred Nixon felt towards his enemies - that is way downplayed, at best hinted at.

Very much not worth reading if you're serious about understanding what Watergate showed about the Nixon White House.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Rehashing The Way It Was

If you were alive and reading the daily paper in 1972, you already know the gist of this story. If not, here it is, in brief:

President Richard Nixon was running for his second term, and a group of cronies, aides, former CIA spooks, and fellow-traveling politicos were involved in a burglary of the Democratic National Committee's headquarters in the Watergate, a Washington complex of offices, shops, and apartments. What were they after? The story varies, but they were hoping for something to embarrass George McGovern, the Democratic candidate for president, possibly something aligning the Democrats with Castro's Communist regime in Cuba.
The burglars were caught, and some of those on the firing line went to jail. Due to the efforts of the Washington Post's intrepid reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, heads rolled upward until Nixon himself resigned from office.

What Mallon has done here is to fictionalize the personal lives of the ones closest to the Watergate drama, i.e., the burglars and others implicated. His accomplishment is in indicating how life for these people went on, more or less as usual, even as the scandal disrupted their lives, often permnently. The tone here goes something like this: "What's the big deal? It was an escapade, a prank of the political sort, and now the Democrats are using it to ravage the Nixon Administration."

Mallon's story is witty at times (although not nearly as comedic as the press releases would have you believe). Nixon seems more resilient than the press portrayed him at the time; thus he becomes a slightly sympathetic character in Mallon's hands. The women hovering about Nixon's life during this time - his wife Pat, his secretary, Rose Woods, and Alice Longworth, an irascible scion of the Roosevelt family, seem to exert the strongest influence on the Watergate drama, but it's the stereotypical `50s-`60s sort of feminine influence.

Mallon's challenge here - and the area in which he isn't completely successful - is in finding the story's characterizing center. At times Nixon sits at the center of Mallon's storm, at other times, other of the participants. This is of course the way the story played out, but Mallon has written it in a journalistic form that left me asking, "Whose story was it, really?"

Still, it's an astute look at a pivotal moment on U.S. political history, and for that reason, it's worth the read.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointing

I was very disappointed with the book. It uses the events of Watergate as a backdrop to characterize the individuals involved and is not really about the famous break in and subsequent cover ups and trials. It provides no new insights or understandings for the reader, especially if that reader were an adult at the time and followed the drawn out proceedings in the daily news. With the possible exception of Alice Roosevelt Longworth, the characters are flat and uninteresting, probably reflecting fairly accurately the banality of the personalities involved in a series of events which captured public imagination for years, and still does. Mallon's omniscient narrator point of view, although reporting on private thoughts and conversations, never satisfies the reader's urge to know more than he already does. I think Mallon's whole purpose for writing the book is to portray Richard Nixon, insipid in this characterization, as a sort of tragic hero, forced to quit a job which the writer seems to imply that he was good at because of a desire to appear to know more than he actually did. The whole book is much ado about nothing and certainly doesn't help the reader penetrate the fog of these confusing times or even to understand the individuals involved better. More poetic license and a great deal more imagination were needed.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Like watching paint dry.

I bought this book because The New Yorker said it was "historical fiction that moves with the pace of a thriller." Huh? It's all first person narrative (from different characters' points of view) and the characters think only about(1) how bored they are, (2) whether some female is fashionable, (3) what they're going to have for lunch, (4) when they're going to have their next drink, (5) who excites their petty professional/personal resentments, and (6)whether they're going to have enough money.

True, those are the topics most people actually think about. The novel is "realistic" in that sense, but completely lacking in artistry. No character says, or does, or thinks ANYTHING worthy of the reader's atention. Hundreds, and hundreds of pages about the tedium of policital protocol, having to show up to deadly dull events with a fixed smile and shiny shoes.

Where is the artistry? The sentences are not well crafted, the dialogue is not original, the settings are not particularly interesting (no Mad Men-type pleasure in well-researched nostalgia here), almost nothing happens in most of the plot, and the characters do not excite your compassion or rage.

You wouldn't think the Watergate scandal could be made dull. Think again. I've read fashion editorials that were more thrilling.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Masterpiece.

To describe "War and Peace" as a book about Napoleon's campaign in Russia is as inadequate as to say that Thomas Mallon's "Watergate" is a book about the Watergate scandal. For those who don't know, Napoleon invaded Russia in 1812 and came close to destroying Moscow and extending the French empire all the way to Asia, until the frigid cold, among other things, drove his armies back, crushed. "Watergate" is the name we've given to the scandal that brought down the Nixon presidency in 1974 which resulted from a two-bit, pointless burglary by Republican dirty-tricks operatives at the Democratic National Committee's offices and the resultant efforts, involving the White House, to cover it up. But "War and Peace" is more involvingly about Natasha, Prince Andre, and Pierre, while "Watergate" is about only slightly less fictional characters with the names of Pat and Richard Nixon, Fred LaRue, Rosemary Woods, and Alice Roosevelt Longworth. How Mallon makes these characters live on the page as much as anything he has to say about Watergate makes the book a masterpiece. Although you learn a lot about Watergate in the course of the novel, its main concern is human complexity and the theme of unintended consequences and will. The female characters are a triumph - Pat Nixon, Nixon's secretary Rosemary Woods, TR's daughter, and the wise-cracking, terrifyingly destructive Martha Mitchell. These women are given some lovable men: Tom Garahan, an imagined lover for Mrs. Nixon, and Fred LaRue, the Watergate bagman, improbably turned into a touching character with great depth. The most important character is Nixon himself, whose combination of weakness and strength Mallon makes worthy of a Shakespearean tragic hero. Don't read the book if you want to "know more" about Watergate. Read it because you want to feel more about life and the pity of how we rise and fall, love and die. This is my nomination for the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 2012.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Like Watergate itself, too sprawling

As a Watergate buff, I was fascinated by the idea of this novel - creating a novel out of the Watergate crisis. The problem with this book is that novels work well when the reader becomes invested in what what happens to one or more more of the main characters, but there is no one central character, unless you count Nixon, who is hard to have sympathy for. Because the Watergate crisis involved so many, Mallon moves between various characters: Elliot Richardson, Pat Nixon, Fred LaRue (a less well known conspirator who is in some ways the central character of this book), Howard Hunt, and others. When you already know the overall outcome (Nixon does resign!), you need some other things to sustain your interest and your concern. For me, the book didn't quite carry that off.

Historically, the book is good in the broad outline - all of the details of the conspiracy that are publicly known are correct, and the fiction is saved for things like motivations and back stories. There are several very sympathetically drawn characters. Pat Nixon is shown as a somewhat impatient woman who has chosen to be the epitome of patience, and who has also found a morsel of affection in a very civilized affair that occurred before the Nixons entered the White House. Rose Mary Woods, Nixon's secretary, is shown as a lover of dancing and gentlemanly attentions, as well as fiercely loyal secretary who creates the 18-minute gap in a pique of wine-induced frustration.

I particularly like how the elderly Alice Roosevelt Longworth, daughter of T.R., is used as both a foil for Nixon's White House, and a sympathetic Greek chorus to Nixon's peculiar brand of paranoia and darkness.

So while there were many nice details, and a general respect for the historical outline, I found that I had to push myself to finish the book, because there was no particular narrative that intrigued me. Ensemble casts in plays, and ensemble casts in books are hard to pull off, and this book didn't quite manage to pull it off, despite decent writing and characterization.
5 people found this helpful