Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power
Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power book cover

Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power

Hardcover – November 13, 2012

Price
$21.12
Format
Hardcover
Pages
800
Publisher
Random House
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1400067664
Dimensions
6.5 x 1.64 x 9.62 inches
Weight
2.7 pounds

Description

Amazon Best Books of the Month, November 2012 : As multifaceted a character as has ever been seen in American history (not to mention politics), Thomas Jefferson was perhaps the ideal leader for the young nation still struggling with external threats and its own identity: a to-the-core individualist and visionary who both embodied and reconciled the contradictions of individualism and a shared nationality. It’s no mean feat to render the life and times of such a figure (much less make it compulsively readable), but as with his Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Andrew Jackson ( American Lion ), Jon Meacham’s Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power vividly illustrates the world and impact of our third president, deftly weaving the threads of Jefferson’s personality into a complete portrait of a singularly complex politician and thinker--a philosopher president. -- Jon Foro “ Fascinating and insightful … Many books have been written about Jefferson’s life, but few have created such a vivid portrait … Meacham immerses the reader in that period of history to explain Jefferson’s behavior during an era when the nation was as contradictory as he was … extraordinary … essential.” — The Associated Press “[A]ccomplishes something more impressive than dissecting Jefferson’s political skills by explaining his greatness, a different task from chronicling a life, though he does that too — and handsomely. Even though I know quite a lot about Jefferson, I was repeatedly surprised by the fresh information Meacham brings to his work. Surely there is not a significant detail out there, in any pertinent archive, that he has missed.” —Joyce Appleby, Washington Post “[Meacham] argues persuasively that for Jefferson the ideal of liberty was not incompatible with a strong federal government, and also that Jefferson’s service in the Congress in 1776 left him thoroughly versed in the ways and means of politics … Meacham wisely has chosen to look at Jefferson through a political lens, assessing how he balanced his ideals with pragmatism while also bending others to his will. And just as he scolded Jackson, another slaveholder and champion of individual liberty, for being a hypocrite, so Meacham gives a tough-minded account of Jefferson’s slippery recalibrations on race … Where other historians have found hypocrisy in Jefferson’s use of executive power to complete the Louisiana Purchase, Meacham is nuanced and persuasive..” —Jill Abramson, The New York Times Book Review “[Meacham] does an excellent job getting inside Jefferson's head and his world … Meacham presents Jefferson's life in a textured narrative that weaves together Jefferson's well-traveled career.” — USA Today “A big, grand, absorbing exploration of not just Jefferson and his role in history but also Jefferson the man, humanized as never before. [Grade:] A-.” — Entertainment Weekly “Impeccably researched and footnoted … a model of clarity and explanation.” — Bloomberg “[Meacham] captures who Jefferson was, not just as a statesman but as a man … By the end of the book, as the 83-year-old Founding Father struggles to survive until the Fourth of July, 1826, the 50th anniversary of his masterful Declaration, the reader is likely to feel as if he is losing a dear friend … [an] absorbing tale.” — Christian Science Monitor “Absorbing . . . Jefferson emerges in the book not merely as a lofty thinker but as the ultimate political operator, a master pragmatist who got things done in times nearly as fractious as our own.” — Chicago Tribune “[Jefferson’s] life is a riveting story of our nation’s founding—an improbable turn of events that seems only in retrospect inevitable. Few are better suited to the telling than Jon Meacham. . . . Captivating.” — The Seattle Times “[Meacham] brings to bear his focused and sensitive scholarship, rich prose style … The Jefferson that emerges from these astute, dramatic pages is a figure worthy of continued study and appreciation … [a] very impressive book.” — Booklist (Starred Review) “An outstanding biography that reveals an overlooked steeliness at Jefferson’s core that accounts for so much of his political success.” — Kirkus Reviews “Jon Meacham understands Thomas Jefferson. With thorough and up-to-date research, elegant writing, deep insight, and an open mind, he brings Jefferson, the most talented politician of his generation—and one of the most talented in our nation’s history—into full view. It is no small task to capture so capacious a life in one volume. Meacham has succeeded, giving us a rich presentation of our third president’s life and times. This is an extraordinary work.” —Annette Gordon-Reed, author of The Hemingses of Monticello “This terrific book allows us to see the political genius of Thomas Jefferson better than we have ever seen it before. In these endlessly fascinating pages, Jefferson emerges with such vitality that it seems as if he might still be alive today.” —Doris Kearns Goodwin, author of Team of Rivals “Jon Meacham resolves the bundle of contradictions that was Thomas Jefferson by probing his love of progress and thirst for power. Here was a man endlessly, artfully intent on making the world something it had not been before. A thrilling and affecting portrait of our first philosopher-politician.” —Stacy Schiff, author of Cleopatra: A Life "A true triumph. In addition to being a brilliant biography, this book is a guide to the use of power. Jon Meacham shows how Jefferson's deft ability to compromise and improvise made him a transformational leader. We think of Jefferson as the embodiment of noble ideals, as he was, but Meacham shows that he was a practical politician more than a moral theorist. The result is a fascinating look at how Jefferson wielded his driving desire for power and control." —Walter Isaacson, author of Steve Jobs "This is probably the best single-volume biography of Jefferson ever written; it is certainly the most readable." —Gordon Wood, author of The Radicalism of the American Revolution “This is Jon Meacham's best book yet. Evocatively written and deeply researched, it sheds brilliant light on facets of Thomas Jefferson we haven't seen before, gives us original and unexpected new insights into his identity and character, and uses the irresistible story of this talented, manipulative, complicated man to bring us life lessons on universal subjects from family and friendship to politics and leadership. The Sage of Monticello made a considerable effort to turn his life into a mystery, but in a splendid match of biographer with subject, Meacham has cracked the Jefferson code." —Michael Beschloss Jon Meacham received the Pulitzer Prize for his 2008 biography of Andrew Jackson, American Lion . He is also the author of the New York Times bestsellers Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, American Gospel, and Franklin and Winston . Meacham, who teaches at Vanderbilt University and at The University of the South, is a fellow of the Society of American Historians. He lives in Nashville and in Sewanee with his wife and children. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. oneA Fortunate SonIt is the strong in body who are both the strong and free in mind.—Peter Jefferson, the father of Thomas JeffersonHe was the kind of man people noticed. An imposing, prosperous, well-liked farmer known for his feats of strength and his capacity for endurance in the wilderness, Peter Jefferson had amassed large tracts of land and scores of slaves in and around what became Albemarle County, Virginia. There, along the Rivanna, he built Shadwell, named after the London parish where his wife, Jane, had been baptized.The first half of the eighteenth century was a thrilling time to be young, white, male, wealthy, and Virginian. Money was to be made, property to be claimed, tobacco to be planted and sold. There were plenty of ambitious men about—men with the boldness and the drive to create farms, build houses, and accumulate fortunes in land and slaves in the wilderness of the mid-Atlantic.As a surveyor and a planter, Peter Jefferson thrived there, and his eldest son, Thomas, born on April 13, 1743, understood his father was a man other men admired.Celebrated for his courage, Peter Jefferson excelled at riding and hunting. His son recalled that the father once singlehandedly pulled down a wooden shed that had stood impervious to the exertions of three slaves who had been ordered to destroy the building. On another occasion, Peter was said to have uprighted two huge hogsheads of tobacco that weighed a thousand pounds each—a remarkable, if mythical, achievement.The father’s standing mattered greatly to the son, who remembered him in a superlative and sentimental light. “The tradition in my father’s family was that their ancestor came to this country from Wales, and from near the mountain of Snowden, the highest in Great Britain,” Jefferson wrote. The connection to Snowden was the only detail of the Jeffersons’ old-world origins to pass from generation to generation. Everything else about the ancient roots of the paternal clan slipped into the mists, save for this: that they came from a place of height and of distinction—if not of birth, then of strength.Thomas Jefferson was his father’s son. He was raised to wield power. By example and perhaps explicitly he was taught that to be great—to be heeded—one had to grow comfortable with authority and with responsibility. An able student and eager reader, Jefferson was practical as well as scholarly, resourceful as well as analytical.Jefferson learned the importance of endurance and improvisation early, and he learned it the way his father wanted him to: through action, not theory. At age ten, Thomas was sent into the woods of Shadwell, alone, with a gun. The assignment—the expectation—was that he was to come home with evidence that he could survive on his own in the wild.The test did not begin well. He killed nothing, had nothing to show for himself. The woods were forbidding. Everything around the boy—the trees and the thickets and the rocks and the river—was frightening and frustrating.He refused to give up or give in. He soldiered on until his luck finally changed. “Finding a wild turkey caught in a pen,” the family story went, “he tied it with his garter to a tree, shot it, and carried it home in triumph.”The trial in the forest foreshadowed much in Jefferson’s life. When stymied, he learned to press forward. Presented with an unexpected opening, he figured out how to take full advantage. Victorious, he enjoyed his success.Jefferson was taught by his father and mother, and later by his teachers and mentors, that a gentleman owed service to his family, to his neighborhood, to his county, to his colony, and to his king. An eldest son in the Virginia of his time grew up expecting to lead—and to be followed. Thomas Jefferson came of age with the confidence that controlling the destinies of others was the most natural thing in the world. He was born for command. He never knew anything else.The family had immigrated to Virginia from England in 1612, and in the New World they had moved quickly toward prosperity and respectability. A Jefferson was listed among the delegates of an assembly convened at Jamestown in 1619. The future president’s great-grandfather was a planter who married the daughter of a justice in Charles City County and speculated in land at Yorktown. He died about 1698, leaving an estate of land, slaves, furniture, and livestock. His son, the future president’s grandfather, also named Thomas, rose further in colonial society, owning a racehorse and serving as sheriff and justice of the peace in Henrico County. He kept a good house, in turn leaving his son, Peter Jefferson, silver spoons and a substantial amount of furniture. As a captain of the militia, Thomas Jefferson’s grandfather once hosted Colonel William Byrd II, one of Virginia’s greatest men, for a dinner of roast beef and persico wine.Peter Jefferson built on the work of his fathers. Born in Chesterfield County in 1708, Peter would surpass the first Thomas Jefferson, who had been a fine hunter and surveyor of roads. With Joshua Fry, professor of mathematics at the College of William and Mary, Peter Jefferson drew the first authoritative map of Virginia and ran the boundary line between Virginia and North Carolina, an achievement all the more remarkable given his intellectual background. “My father’s education had been quite neglected; but being of a strong mind, sound judgment and eager after information,” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “he read much and improved himself.” Self taught, Peter Jefferson became a colonel of the militia, vestryman, and member of the Virginia House of Burgesses.On that expedition to fix the boundary between Virginia and North Carolina, the father proved himself a hero of the frontier. Working their way across the Blue Ridge, Peter Jefferson and his colleagues fought off “the attacks of wild beasts during the day, and at night found but a broken rest, sleeping—as they were obliged to do for safety—in trees,” as a family chronicler wrote.Low on food, exhausted, and faint, the band faltered—save for Jefferson, who subsisted on the raw flesh of animals (“or whatever could be found to sustain life,” as the family story had it) until the job was done.Thomas Jefferson grew up with an image—and, until Peter Jefferson’s death when his son was fourteen, the reality—of a father who was powerful, who could do things other men could not, and who, through the force of his will or of his muscles or of both at once, could tangibly transform the world around him. Surveyors defined new worlds; explorers conquered the unknown; mapmakers brought form to the formless. Peter Jefferson was all three and thus claimed a central place in the imagination of his son, who admired his father’s strength and spent a lifetime recounting tales of the older man’s daring. Thomas Jefferson, a great-granddaughter said, “never wearied of dwelling with all the pride of filial devotion and admiration on the noble traits” of his father’s character. The father had shaped the ways other men lived. The son did all he could to play the same role in the lives of others.Peter Jefferson had married very well, taking a bride from Virginia’s leading family. In 1739, he wed Jane Randolph, a daughter of Isham Randolph, a planter and sea captain. Born in London in 1721, Jane Randolph was part of her father’s household at Dungeness in Goochland County, a large establishment with walled gardens.The Randolph family traced its colonial origins to Henry Randolph, who emigrated from England in 1642. Marrying a daughter of the Speaker of the House of Burgesses, Henry Randolph thrived in Virginia, holding office in Henrico County and serving as clerk of the House of Burgesses. Returning home to England in 1669, he apparently prevailed on a young nephew, William, to make the journey to Virginia.William Randolph, Thomas Jefferson’s great-grandfather, thus came to the New World at some point between 1669 and 1674; accounts differ. He, too, rose in Virginia with little delay, taking his uncle’s place as Henrico clerk and steadily acquiring vast acreage. An ally of Lord Berkeley, the British governor, William Randolph soon prospered in shipping, raising tobacco, and slave trading.William became known for his family seat on Turkey Island in the James River, which was described as “a splendid mansion.” With his wife, Mary Isham Randolph, the daughter of the master of a plantation on the James River called Bermuda Hundred, William had ten children, nine of whom survived. The Randolphs “are so numerous that they are obliged, like the clans of Scotland, to be distinguished by their places of residence,” noted Thomas Anburey, an English visitor to Virginia in 1779–80. There was William of Chatsworth; Thomas of Tuckahoe; Sir John of Tazewell Hall, Williamsburg; Richard of Curles Neck; Henry of Longfield; Edward of Bremo. And there was Isham of Dungeness, who was Jefferson’s maternal grandfather.As a captain and a merchant, Jefferson’s grandfather moved between the New and Old Worlds. About 1717, he married an Englishwoman, Jane Rogers, who was thought to be a “pretty sort of woman.” They lived in London and at their Goochland County estate in Virginia.In 1737, a merchant described Thomas Jefferson’s grandfather’s family as “a very gentle, well-dressed people.” Jefferson’s mother, Jane, was a daughter of this house and had an apparent sense of pride in her British ancestry. She was said to have descended from “the powerful Scotch Earls of Murray, connected by blood or alliance with many of the most distinguished families in the English and Scotch peerage, and with royalty itself.”The family of William Byrd II—he was to build Westover, a beautiful Georgian plantation mansion on the James River south of Richmond—had greater means than the Jeffersons, but the description of a fairly typical day for Byrd in February 1711 gives a sense of what life was like for the Virginia elite in the decades before the birth of Thomas Jefferson.I rose at 6 o’clock and read two chapters in Hebrew and some Greek in Lucian. I said my prayers and ate boiled milk for breakfast. I danced my dance [exercised] and then went to the brick house to see my people pile the planks and found them all idle for which I threatened the soundly but did not whip them. The weather was cold and the wind at northeast. I wrote a letter to England. Then I read some English till 12 o’clock when Mr. Dunn and his wife came. I ate boiled beef for dinner. In the afternoon Mr. Dunn and I played at billiards. Then we took a long walk about the plantation and looked over all my business.u2008.u2008.u2008. At night I ate some bread and cheese.Whether in the Tidewater regions closer to the Atlantic or in the forested hills of the Blue Ridge, the Virginia into which Jefferson was born offered lives of privilege to its most fortunate sons.Visiting Virginia and Maryland, an English traveler observed “the youth of these more indulgent settlementsu2008.u2008.u2008.u2008are pampered much more in softness and ease than their neighbors more northward.” Children were instructed in music and taught to dance, including minuets and what were called “country-dances.” One tutor described such lessons at Nomini Hall, the Carter family estate roughly one hundred miles east of Albemarle. The scene of young Virginians dancing, he said, “was indeed beautiful to admiration, to see such a number of young persons, set off by dress to the best advantage, moving easily, to the sound of well-performed music, and with perfect regularity.”Thomas Jefferson was therefore born to a high rank of colonial society and grew up as the eldest son of a prosperous, cultured, and sophisticated family. They dined with silver, danced with grace, entertained constantly.His father worked in his study on the first floor of the house—it was one of four rooms on that level—at a cherry desk. Peter Jefferson’s library included Shakespeare, Jonathan Swift, Joseph Addison, and Paul de Rapin-Thoyras’s History of England. “When young, I was passionately fond of reading books of history, and travels,” Thomas Jefferson wrote. Of note were George Anson’s Voyage Round the World and John Ogilby’s America, both books that offered the young Jefferson literary passage to larger worlds. A grandson recalled Jefferson’s saying that “from the time when, as a boy, he had turned off wearied from play and first found pleasure in books, he had never sat down in idleness.”It was a world of leisure for well-off white Virginians. “My father had a devoted friend to whose house he would go, dine, spend the night, dine with him again on the second day, and return to Shadwell in the evening,” Jefferson recalled. “His friend, in the course of a day or two, returned the visit, and spent the same length of time at his house. This occurred once every week; and thus, you see, they were together four days out of the seven.” The food was good and plentiful, the drink strong and bracing, the company cheerful and familiar.Jefferson believed his first memory was of being handed up to a slave on horseback and carried, carefully, on a pillow for a long journey: an infant white master being cared for by someone whose freedom was not his own. Jefferson was two or three at the time. On that trip the family was bound for Tuckahoe, a Randolph estate about sixty miles southeast of Shadwell. Tuckahoe’s master, Jane Randolph Jefferson’s cousin William Randolph, had just died. A widower, William Randolph had asked Peter Jefferson, his “dear and loving friend,” to come to Tuckahoe in the event of his death and raise Randolph’s three children there, and Peter Jefferson did so. (William Randolph and Peter Jefferson had been so close that Peter Jefferson had once purchased four hundred acres of land—the ultimate site of Shadwell—from Randolph. The price: “Henry Weatherbourne’s biggest bowl of arrack [rum] punch!”)The Jeffersons would stay on the Randolph place for seven years, from the time William Randolph died, when Thomas was two or three, until Thomas was nine or ten.Peter Jefferson, who apparently received his and his family’s living expenses from the Randolph estate (which he managed well), used the years at Tuckahoe to discharge his duty to his dead friend while his own Albemarle fields were being cleared. This was the era of many of Peter Jefferson’s expeditions, which meant he was away from home for periods of time, leaving his wife and the combined Randolph and Jefferson families at Tuckahoe.The roots of the adult Jefferson’s dislike of personal confrontation may lie partly in the years he spent at Tuckahoe as a member of a large combined family. Though the eldest son of Peter and Jane Jefferson, Thomas was spending some formative years in a house not his own. His nearest contemporary, Thomas Mann Randolph, was two years older than he was, and this Thomas Randolph was the heir of the Tuckahoe property. Whether such distinctions manifested themselves when the children were so young is unknowable, but Jefferson emerged from his childhood devoted to avoiding conflict at just about any cost. It is possible his years at Tuckahoe set him on a path toward favoring comity over controversy in face-to-face relations. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY
  • The New York Times Book Review • The Washington Post • Entertainment Weekly • The Seattle Times • St. Louis Post-Dispatch • Bloomberg Businessweek
  • In this magnificent biography, the Pulitzer Prize–winning author of
  • American Lion
  • and
  • Franklin and Winston
  • brings vividly to life an extraordinary man and his remarkable times.
  • Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power
  • gives us Jefferson the politician and president, a great and complex human being forever engaged in the wars of his era. Philosophers think; politicians maneuver. Jefferson’s genius was that he was both and could do both, often simultaneously. Such is the art of power.   Thomas Jefferson hated confrontation, and yet his understanding of power and of human nature enabled him to move men and to marshal ideas, to learn from his mistakes, and to prevail. Passionate about many things—women, his family, books, science, architecture, gardens, friends, Monticello, and Paris—Jefferson loved America most, and he strove over and over again, despite fierce opposition, to realize his vision: the creation, survival, and success of popular government in America. Jon Meacham lets us see Jefferson’s world as Jefferson himself saw it, and to appreciate how Jefferson found the means to endure and win in the face of rife partisan division, economic uncertainty, and external threat. Drawing on archives in the United States, England, and France, as well as unpublished Jefferson presidential papers, Meacham presents Jefferson as the most successful political leader of the early republic, and perhaps in all of American history.   The father of the ideal of individual liberty, of the Louisiana Purchase, of the Lewis and Clark expedition, and of the settling of the West, Jefferson recognized that the genius of humanity—and the genius of the new nation—lay in the possibility of progress, of discovering the undiscovered and seeking the unknown. From the writing of the Declaration of Independence to elegant dinners in Paris and in the President’s House; from political maneuverings in the boardinghouses and legislative halls of Philadelphia and New York to the infant capital on the Potomac; from his complicated life at Monticello, his breathtaking house and plantation in Virginia, to the creation of the University of Virginia, Jefferson was central to the age. Here too is the personal Jefferson, a man of appetite, sensuality, and passion.   The Jefferson story resonates today not least because he led his nation through ferocious partisanship and cultural warfare amid economic change and external threats, and also because he embodies an eternal drama, the struggle of the leadership of a nation to achieve greatness in a difficult and confounding world.
  • Praise for
  • Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power
  • “This is probably the best single-volume biography of Jefferson ever written.”
  • —Gordon S. Wood
  • “A big, grand, absorbing exploration of not just Jefferson and his role in history but also Jefferson the man, humanized as never before.”
  • Entertainment Weekly
  • “[Meacham] captures who Jefferson was, not just as a statesman but as a man. . . . By the end of the book . . . the reader is likely to feel as if he is losing a dear friend. . . . [An] absorbing tale.”
  • —The Christian Science Monitor
  • “This terrific book allows us to see the political genius of Thomas Jefferson better than we have ever seen it before. In these endlessly fascinating pages, Jefferson emerges with such vitality that it seems as if he might still be alive today.”
  • —Doris Kearns Goodwin

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(2.4K)
★★★★
25%
(1K)
★★★
15%
(603)
★★
7%
(281)
-7%
(-282)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

A New Thomas Jefferson?

I've read a couple books on Thomas Jefferson in the past. [[ASIN:0679764410 American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson]], and [[ASIN:0393338339 Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History]] to name a couple. Up until this newest book by Jon Meacham, I though that the essential character of Jefferson was essentially unknowable, a man of contradictions and hiddenness. Yet, Meacham manages, in his large but fascinating and quick read, to illuminate Jefferson through a new pair of eyes: that of his leadership. In doing so, we meet a new Jefferson, sometimes wily, always intelligent, always forward thinking.

Jon Meacham wrote one of my favorite books, [[ASIN:0812973461 American Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White House]], which I've read at least twice and listened to on my iPod while running each summer. Meacham has a way of writing his history that manages to avoid the endless onslaught of names and trivial facts, and truly centers on the person. By doing so, he creates a momentum in his writing that's compelling and hard to put down.

Meacham's unique spin on Jefferson (if spin is the right word .... more of a focus) is how he developed his leadership and vision for America. This focus causes Meacham to rush in his writing through Jefferson's early years (before you know it, he's attending the second Continental Congress) and getting him to the national stage as quickly as possible, which was refreshening and never abrupt. He paints some familiar portraits of Jefferson, that of a hard working student in Williamsburg, a devoted husband (before being a bit of a scalawag in the wooing of women), and that of a slave owner who knew his status was wrong and failed to do anything about it.

Because of this, Jefferson comes alive in his pages. While not overtly revelatory, the book manages to be revelatory because you feel, after reading it, that you know better this sphinx of a man. The challenge of any historian is trying to make a subject that many people have written about new; authors of Washington and Lincoln biographies suffer the same fate. Because of the strength of Meacham's writing style, though, and the speed in which you can devour the pages, Jefferson is illuminated.

If you haven't read any book on Jefferson, this should be your initial entry into his world. It will be a journey, much like that of Jefferson and his wife as they traveled up the steep mountain of Monticello after they were married, which promises to bring much joy and excitement as you discover this man. And for those of you, like myself, who know a little of his story, it's still well worth your time.
661 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Simpler, Sometimes Simplistic, View of Jefferson the Man and Statesman

Throughout our history Presidents as politically diverse as Lincoln, Wilson, FDR, Kennedy and Reagan have enthusiastically embraced the legacy of their predecessor, Thomas Jefferson. Recent scholarship on the Founding generation, however, has unfairly diminished Jefferson in Jon Meacham's view. Biographies of Washington, Adams and Hamilton have all tended to reduce Jefferson to the role of an intriguer lurking in the background, a foil for Hamilton and Adams in particular. In Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, Meacham reclaims Jefferson's prominence in setting America on her course, asserting that most of the Presidents who served between 1800 and 1840 were Jeffersonians, and holds Jefferson up as a role model for today's politicians struggling to reconcile political idealism with the realism needed to traverse the rough waters of democratic politics.

The Art of Power is a very well written narrative and moves at a fast paced with chapters generally ranging from 10-15 pages. While Meacham clearly admires Jefferson, though, he is able to acknowledge Jefferson's failures and contradictions as well. However, there are several shortcomings that detracted from my enjoyment of the Art of Power.

First, while The Art of Power covers Jefferson's personal and political lives thoroughly, Meacham appears to have been poorly served by certain curious editorial choices. His summation of Jefferson's legacy appears in the Author's Note, and much of the detail necessary to inform the reader of vital details is contained in the nearly 200 pages of end notes. For example the text makes it appear as if there is no question whatsoever regarding Jefferson's paternity of his slave's children. Only in the footnotes will the reader learn of the controversy and evidence supporting both Meacham's conclusion and other possibilities. The complexities involved in other details of the Jefferson story sometimes also seem slighted in order to ensure the narrative pace remains speedy.

Next, despite his theme of a politician who mastered the art of power to successfully reconcile philosophy with practicality Meacham treads lightly on Jefferson's philosophy (one of very few omissions in his lengthy bibliography, tellingly, is Jean Yarborough's study of Jefferson's political and moral philosophy). This is a shame because his portrait of a Jefferson that does not fit the libertarian mold is provocative and interesting. Meacham's Jefferson is less antipathetic to large government, federal and executive power and commerce than is commonly understood today, but Meacham does little to explore further Jefferson's thinking on these and other matters, nor does he attempt any explanation of why the Jefferson of common perception does not fit Meacham's own reading, which would have been very interesting to me. His is a Jefferson more of action than thought.

Readers looking for a high readable introduction to the political events of Jefferson's time or personal life will enjoy this work, and it seems to fill the need for a good medium sized Jefferson biography to fill the gap between R.B. Bernstein's very perceptive short study and Merrill Peterson's 1,000 page tome. Those seeking a more rounded treatment of all Jefferson's facets may find themselves disappointed, however. Similarly, readers looking for a more robust treatment of the period may wish to utilize Meacham's exhaustive bibliography for further reading.
372 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The art of soft power

I'll admit to being a Jefferson fan. His vision is what led me to UVa, and his depth and breadth of knowledge and experience still astounds me. Truly a renaissance man who seemed to master most of what he attempted - languages, science, music, politics, and a man of stark contradictions. A man who owned slaves and yet campaigned to free them. A man who enjoyed political power but despised face to face confrontations. This book captures this man, and I think does an excellent job developing a focal point to use to understand Jefferson, his contributions and his flaws.

Meacham uses one "prism" to evaluate Jefferson's life - the acquisition and use of power to achieve Jefferson's vision and aims. While this is nominally a biography, the depth of the book lies in examining how and when Jefferson acquired and used power to achieve his aims. While I had hoped to read more about the University of Virginia, I knew the book wouldn't spend much time on it, and it didn't. The vast majority of the book is spent examining the unfolding disagreement between the Federalists, primarily in New England, who sought closer relationship with England and rule by the privileged and the few, and the Democrats, primarily in the Mid-Atlantic and South, who worked for individual democracy. It came as a surprise to me to learn that several times the Northeastern states contemplated secession over the style of government. This is little reported in US history.

Jefferson felt that the Revolution was fought to free the Americans to pursue individual freedoms, individual liberty which could only result from participative democracy. Many of the Federalists believed that the average citizen could not participate in government effectively and wanted a privileged ruling class. The battles fought during the end of Washington's presidency and John Adam's presidency were over this issue. When Jefferson won the presidency he used "Hamiltonian means to Jeffersonian ends" to quote the author. Jefferson actually strengthened the office of the presidency through the acquisition of Louisiana and many other actions that true "democrats" of his time felt left more power in the state than necessary. But, of the two visions - Federalist or Democratic - Jefferson clearly won and influenced the politics of the country for another half century. Many of his counterparts or followers became president (Madison, Monroe, Jackson) and this democratic vision defined the country at least until the Civil War.

Other reviewers have written about the gaps in the biography - not enough about Jefferson's slave holdings, not enough about his education and early childhood, not enough about his development of UVa. But those are incidental to the book Meacham set out to write. While they are part of Jefferson's life, they are not necessarily about his acquisition and use of political power to achieve his vision. When looked at in this context, the book is well-researched and very complete.

The one item that's missing for me is the "why" - why Jefferson, a relatively wealthy man, a slave holder, an admirer of French and the aristocracy over the English - would come to champion individual liberty and democracy. Yes, he was influenced by Hume, Locke and others, but that still doesn't explain the flash of insight that became such a compelling cause. Jefferson was surrounded by people who constantly failed - several sons and sons-in-law who were drunkards, bankrupts. He himself was a terrible manager of money. Yet he felt certain that the best government was the one that allows everyone, rich and poor, educated and uneducated, to participate in and to choose their leaders. What did he see, what did he believe about individual rights, freedom and the common good that led him to believe this English "rabble" could form a better government? Where those beliefs come from is still a bit of a mystery. Just as well, because he's been called a Sphinx, and often held contradictory beliefs. Perhaps we'll never really know what drove him, but The Art of Power goes a long way to explaining what he did and why he did what he did in the interest of his vision and the use of power.
200 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A most disappointing biography

Upon careful reading of this weighty book filled mostly with most lofty praise and adoration, one is hard-pressed to call it a legitimate biography, but rather a description of how Jefferson appeared and filled a room with his elegance. There is very little analysis of the political views of Jefferson, except that he had the common sense to purchase the Louisiana Territory when it was offered at a bargain price. In fact, there is tremendous repetition in the way the author - obviously unedited by his subordinates at Random House, goes on and on from chapter to chapter to describe what a fine figure of a man Jefferson was and how he appeared in public. This, of course, is a curious bit of conjecture, since we have nothing but a couple of sitting portraits of the man at the hand of a complimentary painter. What we do not get in this voluminous, pro-Jefferson book is any understanding of the real politics that separated him from his contemporaries. We do know from history and less from this recent fluff piece of writing that Jefferson was not a shoe-in for election to the presidency, but nearly lost the position to a relative political unknown, Aaron Burr, who was selected to run as his vice president. We do not read the underside of political politics where Jefferson and Burr competed for the office and were deadlocked for the presidency, nor the political differences that separate Jefferson from Burr (or even Hamilton, for that matter). The author here takes the common historical perspective that Burr had little real political chops, but was only an opportunist. It does not explore Burr's efforts to abolish slavery in the legislature or Burr's successful efforts to defend himself against charges of treason, brought by Mr. Jefferson. It does explore how handsome Jefferson was and how everyone adored him. Well, not everyone, perhaps. It took numerous ballots to put him over the top and wrest the presidency from an unknown in Mr. Burr. I would imagine that the author will collect another trophy for this book. It's easy to crank out an 800-page book any way you want when you are in charge of the editorial department of your publishing house. And with the commonly held view of Jefferson as a great American father of democracy, people will swallow this book whole. I'm not so ready to do so, having read it and having read a little deeper into political history.
54 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Another piece of revisionist garbage...

I wish I had read the prologue to this book more carefully before I bought it, because I never would have, had I done so.

Meacham,like any other modern revisionist, chooses to latch on to DNA "evidence" that tells us Jefferson and Sally Hemings had an affair. He points to "mainstream white historians" who defend Jefferson while he himself uses words such as, "likely", and "apparently" as irrefutable evidence of the supposed "affair" while completely disregarding the fact that there is absolutely no direct evidence that any such illicit relationship existed. Jefferson never referred to Hemings as anything other than "Polly's maid". In fact, other writings by Jefferson himself which the author conveniently leaves out tell us that Jefferson spoke against such liasons. Does this sound like a man who is obsessed?

For the record, the DNA evidence was taken from a relative of Jefferson and only points to the fact that a Jefferson male was the father of Heming's oldest child. Meacham completely leaves out the fact that there were over 25 relations in the area at the time, and is in no way proof that the same father is that to the other Hemings children. Also, the fact that the original assertion was presented by one of Jefferson's political enemys is greatly downplayed in this book.

A much more likely candidate would be Jefferson's brother Randoph, who was known to frequent the slave quarters...but being in a relationship with him would not have been nearly as useful to historians with an axe to grind.

However, as a revisionist historian, it is enough to convict Jefferson on the basis that he was a powerful white man, and therefore must be guilty and had used his position to force a poor black girl into a relationship. Meacham also elevates himself by posing as an "enlightened" white man in presenting his cheap dime novel. Meacham praises Jefferson for his gifts, while at the same time stabbing him in the back with the stuff that bad soap operas are made from. He disregards those character traits when it is convenient to elevate a young, black girl to the world stage. He obviously has his own political agenda to press.

It is due to this adherence to the rules of negative evidence that I cannot not trust Meacham's other suppositions as to Jefferson's other accomplishments and character evaluations.

As a student of history, I had always thought that it was the duty of those in that vocation to voice truth based on facts, not in the voting majority of historians. I find Meacham's methods of "fact" gathering offensive. I guess in these contemporary times, that if enough academics get together, they could vote that George Washington was a pedophile. George Orwell warned us against this kind of academic rape in his book, "1984".

I would return this book to the bookstore if I could. As a source of knowledge, maybe it'll serve better in my cat's litter box.
52 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

adds little to our understanding of Jefferson

I'm not a huge fan of the big popular biographies of notable Americans that seem to appear all the time. Not that there's anything wrong with them, really. Some are quite good. It's just that the authors of these books tend to try too hard to write with flair and try too hard to say something profound and meaningful about their subjects, and those attempts usually fall flat, resulting in boring, clichéd prose. Meacham's attempts have fallen flat. In addition to other stylistic issues, he leans too heavily on the passive voice, and he breaks down his narrative into sections as short as a couple of paragraphs, something he might've picked up in his years of magazine writing and uses in other books, to the same choppy effect.

Furthermore, a few years' study of a man and period just can't produce the results of someone who spends decades immersed in the study of that man and period. The former is likely to have something like this to say: "An eldest son in the Virginia of his time grew up expecting to lead--and to be followed. Thomas Jefferson came of age with the confidence that controlling the destinies of others was the most natural thing in the world." This is history for middle-schoolers. It misses all the nuance of how society, including primogeniture, was changing in the mid-1700s. Or he'll say something like this: "The first half of the eighteenth century was a thrilling time to be young, white, male, wealthy, and Virginian." More history for middle-schoolers.

Meacham covers the familiar contours of Jefferson's life just fine but adds little to our understanding of the man. If you like your history served up by a talking head whose specialty is pseudoprofound bromides about American history and politics, then this is your book. If not, then you're better off with Merrill Peterson, Dumas Malone, or even Joseph Ellis, none of whom is improved on here.
42 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Amazing Book!

Though history interests me, I am no historian. Most of the reviews about Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power, are written by students of the period. It's enlightening to read them. They see faults in the book, which I could not detect.

What a pleasure it was to read this book! It feels like a well-written novel. The sentence structure is readable and the characterization is excellent. Topics of many biographies interest me. But inevitably I bog down in the terrible writing that seems endemic to them and fail to finish them.

Like most educated Americans, I know quite a bit about the American Revolution and a little about the struggles to create a government afterward. This book revealed to me how much I didn't know! I read it just after the 2012 Presidential election. I am amazed that the reasons for the struggles between Hamilton and Jefferson still cause dissension among us.

Jefferson was clearly a genius. His breadth and depth of thought are staggering. I have been privileged to know a few geniuses. Usually they find it hard to relate to ordinary people. Most settle into a difficult, obscure field where they work happily among other very bright people and make important discoveries. In contrast, Jefferson used his genius to learn how to relate to all kinds of people and to influence politicians to solve their problems. In hindsight, Jefferson's vision of a United States shaped by all the people seems almost trite. In the 21st century people in every country in the world seem to want some version of this. But in Jefferson's time, no country in the world had such a system. So Jefferson can be credited, not only for inspiring our present form of government, but also to be a continuing influence on governmental change throughout the world!

Jefferson's relationship to slavery should make us examine ourselves. His intellect told him it should be abolished. But his self-interest warred with that. This is not unusual. I imagine most people have experienced such conflicts regarding other issues. For example, older people, like me, know that educating the young is important. But we live on fixed incomes. When deciding whether to vote for increased taxes for education, we face a difficult choice. We know we should vote for the increase but we often act in our own self-interest. Meacham tells us that Jefferson twice tried to free slaves. But, when there was no political will to do it, he retreated to his self-interest.

The technical details of whether Sally Hemmings (3/4 white) was or was not Jefferson's mistress are beyond me. But, if Jefferson did have such a relationship, it was because he was honorable. When his beloved wife was dying, he promised he would never remarry. Sally was present when he made the promise. His brief affair in France seemed almost to violate that promise. It may have forced him to realize he was not a monk and needed a sexual outlet. Sally would have understood why that couldn't be a wife. For her the relationship had advantages for both her and her children.

I highly recommend this book for people like me - those who need good writing in order to stick with a long, erudite book, want to learn more about the intellectual foundations of our country, and are interested in learning about a brilliant, amazing man.
38 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

America's First Spin Doctor

Meacham's book falls flat on Jefferson.

His theme is Jefferson's art of power, and much of the book covers up the problems that Jefferson had, largely brought on by himself, and the rest of the book is Meacham's fixation that Sally Hemings bore several children to Jefferson. And speaking of children, while Jefferson was married for ten years, his wife Martha was almost constantly pregnant. They had two daughters that survived birth, and the rest of the story is Martha's strength continuing to wane. After all, there were no dietary supplements and medical knowledge was nothing in comparison to today, but quite simply, Jefferson could possibly have given her a rest and allowed her to regain her strength in an effort to prolong her life, but no, Jefferson always had to have what he wanted.

Jefferson lived at Monticello and not Mount Olympus. All of his great quotations regarding the evil of slavery are stirring words that lack deeds.

Having read Malone's biography of Jefferson more than a third of a century ago, and reading several more since that time, I find this biography one that will not make the hall of fame. I was not impressed with the way the author keeps sticking us in the eye about Sally Hemings, and breezes through some of the short comings of Jefferson like a shopper going through the gates of Wal Mart on Black Friday.

The fact is, while he wrote the Declaration of Independence, he was a failure as a war time governor of his state, spent money all his life that he didn't have while at the same time trying to convince his pundits of an image of a nation that had small, serene farms, was more comfortable with France during his ministry there, was duplicitous during his term of Secretary of State, constantly frustated and thwarted by Hamilton, and one of the few, if not the only major Founding Father that Washington dressed down after the agony of Jay's Treaty was ratified and funded. The reader will find a full account of this in [[ASIN:1594202664 Washington: A Life]] Ron Chernow goes into it in more detail.
Washington understood his being two faced and told him so in a letter, which Meacham barely mentions, as well as barely mentioning John Marshall's trump card decision in Marbury vs. Madison.

Certainly the nation enjoyed a great expansion during the Louisiana Purchase, but this was not so much Jefferson's cunning as it was Napoleon's need for money, and any sitting president would have jumped at the chance.

Meacham also excuses his failed second term when he opted for an embargo that choked the economic trade of America. Yes, he kept us from going to war with England, knowing that we did not have time to build a navy that could compete, and yet he was responsible for our lack of seapower. Adams had made progress in building frigates, [[ASIN:0141014563 Six Frigates]] but Jefferson cut the budgets and tried to do it on the cheap, building gun boats which are only marginal for coastal defense and not suitable for the high seas or against a ship of line, so, as in many other episodes, Jefferson creates the problem, and Meacham makes excuses for him

Jefferson was certainly a great man and influential but he had shortcomings that Meacham doesn't want to expose.

I am confused as to why the author felt it necessary to list 250 pages of notes, bibliography and index on this book. No person in a long lifetime could possibly resource all the material listed, and the inclusion of so much is over the top and adds not one bit to any sense of this being a scholarly work.

I have read a number of bios of Jefferson, and this one is weak, choppy and jumping to conclusions and inadequate.
31 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Author Meacham Follows FALSE Jefferson-Hemings Studies

Mr Meacham has written a fairly good book with "some" details not mentioned in other Jefferson books, not many though. The book has several interesting photos, however when he address the Jefferson-Hemings issue he is persuaded by the Smith Jefferson Studies Group at Monticello, Prof. Peter Onuf, his friend, Prof. Joseph Ellis, Prof. Annette Gordon-Reed, Professor Jan Lewis and other like people (not knowing the DNA issue fully),that there is no proof that Thomas Jefferson fathered the Sally Hemings children.

He took the advice of these as the truth and did not challenge their remarks with his own basic research. He shows no knowledge of the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society, the Scholars Commission Report (available from the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society web page or the several books exposing this vast agenda.

If he were a true unbiased historian and a real champion of Mr Jefferson, as he indicates in other parts of his book, then he must get the facts correct, searching ALL facets of this controversy which he could have found readily from the search pages.

As a long time assistant to Dr Foster on the DNA Study I can inform the author that he has VASTLY neglected to cover BOTH sides of the issue. There is NO proof that Mr Jefferson fathered ANY slave child. What is his motive for such behavior? Let him do some ORIGINAL research HIMSELF instead of accepting the political correctness and historical revisionism of his "associates" mentioned above.

He even accepts Monticello's study remarks that two of Randolph Jefferson's sons were present at the time of Sally's conceptions, BUT he overlooks the fact that they also found the boys to be "TOO YOUNG at age 21 and 24." No wonder that Dr Dan Jordan, then Monticello President chose to "hide under the rug" a Minority Report written by Dr Ken Wallenborn, an employee of Mr Jordan but willing to expose the defective and biased report. Dr Jordan apologized and Dr Wallenborn and two other top guides RESIGNED rather that give a false reply to the Monticello guests.

There is no mention of the opposition Waverly, Ohio newspaper, published a week later than the Pike Co., newspaper giving the Madison Hemings misleading article which Mr Meacham accepts without challenge, and which was used by the Monticello DNA Study as a statement of truth. It was not a truth, it was riddled with unproven statements.

This book may impress many of Mr Meacham's friends and fellow misinformers but careful researchers will see through this including the snide remarks of the picture depicting a colored painting (bottom of page" of a naked lady with the remarks, "Jefferson saw this painting at about the same time he is said to have begun his sexual relationship with Sally Hemings and he may well have identified with the image of a patriarch taking a slave as a concubine." What "sexual relationship"......remember there was NO Jefferson/Hemings DNA match for Jefferson/Woodson....thus Callender was LYING?

Now Mr Jon Meacham WHERE do you get facts to even bring up such a preposterous statement?

Readers please order the book from Amazon and then write your own reviews. This author has received his information from people choosing to deny Mr Jefferson decent reviews.

Herbert Barger
Founder, Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society
Asst. to DNA Study Conducter, Dr E.A. Foster
28 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Rambling and Gossipy

This is a ponderous and painful book to read. I don't understand all the glowing praise for it. Meacham just drifts from one issue to another without much connection other than chronology. He provides little or no depth or perspective on anything important. I'd rather know more about the events surrounding the Lewis and Clark expedition and its competition with the invention of the steam engine than to know he wore slippers in the White House. His important time in France is superficially covered. The events leading to the War of 1812 during Jefferson's administration get no discussion; he seems like a bystander to an event that followed his tenure. And on and on. If you like a gossipy narrative then this is the book to read. As a biography it is severely lacking.
27 people found this helpful