The Vampire Lestat (Vampire Chronicles, Book II)
The Vampire Lestat (Vampire Chronicles, Book II) book cover

The Vampire Lestat (Vampire Chronicles, Book II)

Mass Market Paperback – September 12, 1986

Price
$9.99
Publisher
Ballantine Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345313867
Dimensions
4.12 x 0.88 x 6.89 inches
Weight
8.6 ounces

Description

“Frightening, sensual . . . Anne Rice will live on through the ages of literature. . . . To read her is to become giddy as if spinning through the mind of time, to become lightheaded as if our blood is slowly being drained away.” —San Francisco Chronicle “Fiercely ambitious, nothing less than a complete unnatural history of vampires.” —The Village Voice “Brilliant . . . its undead characters are utterly alive.” —The New York Times Book Review “Luxuriantly created and richly told.” —The Cleveland Plain Dealer From the Inside Flap Once an aristocrat in the heady days of pre-revolutionary France, now Lestat is a rockstar in the demonic, shimmering 1980s. He rushes through the centuries in search of others like him, seeking answers to the mystery of his terrifying exsitence. His story, the second volume in Anne Rice's best-selling Vampire Chronicles, is mesmerizing, passionate, and thrilling."Frightening, sensual."SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE Once an aristocrat in the heady days of pre-revolutionary France, now Lestat is a rockstar in the demonic, shimmering 1980s. He rushes through the centuries in search of others like him, seeking answers to the mystery of his terrifying exsitence. His story, the second volume in Anne Rice's best-selling Vampire Chronicles, is mesmerizing, passionate, and thrilling."Frightening, sensual."SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE Anne Rice is the author of thirty-seven books, including the Vampire Chronicles, the Lives of the Mayfair Witches, and the Wolf Gift book series. Rice was born in New Orleans in 1941 and grew up there and in Texas. She lived in San Francisco with her husband, the poet and painter, Stan Rice until 1988, when they returned to New Orleans to live with their son, Christopher. In 2006, Rice moved to Rancho Mirage, California.xa0She died in 2021. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. IN THE WINTER OF MY TWENTY-FIRST YEAR, I WENT out alone on horseback to kill a pack of wolves.This was on my father's land in the Auvergne in France, and these were the last decades before the French Revolution.It was the worst winter that I could remember, and the wolves were stealing the sheep from our peasants and even running at night through the streets of the village.These were bitter years for me. My father was the Marquis, and I was the seventh son and the youngest of the three who had lived to manhood. I had no claim to the tile or the land, and no prospects. Even in a rich family, it might have been that way for a younger boy, but our wealth had been used up long ago. My eldest brother, Augustin, who was the rightful heir to all we possessed, had spent his wife's small dowry as soon as he married her.My father's castle, his estate, and the village nearby were my entire universe. And I'd been born restless--the dreamer, the angry one, the complainer. I wouldn't sit by the fire and talk of old wars and the days of the Sun King. History had no meaning for me.But in this dim and old fashioned world, I had become the hunter. I brought in the pheasant, the venison, and the trout from the mountain streams--whatever was needed and could be got--to feed the family. It had become my life by this time--and one I shared with no one else--and it was a very good thing that I'd taken it up, because there were years when we might have actually starved to death.Of course this was a noble occupation, hunting one's ancestral lands, and we alone had the right to do it. The richest of the bourgeois couldn't lift his gun in my forests. But then again he didn't have to lift his gun. He had money.Two times in my life I'd tried to escape this life, only to be brought back with my wings broken. But I'll tell more on that later.Right now I'm thinking about the now all over those mountains and the wolves that were frightening the villagers and stealing my sheep. And I'm thinking of the old saying in France in those days, that if you lived in the province of Auvergne you could get no farther from Paris.Understand that since I was the lord and the only lord anymore who could sit a horse and fire a gun, it was natural that the villagers would come to me, complaining about the wolves and expecting me to hunt them. It was my duty.I wasn't the least afraid of the wolves either. Never in my life had I seen or heard of a wolf attacking a man. And I would have poisoned them, if I could, but meat was simply too scarce to lace with poison.So early on a very cold morning in January, I armed myself to kill the wolves one by one. I had three flintlock guns and an excellent flintlock rifle, and these I took with me as well as my muskets and my father's sword. But just before leaving the castle, I added to this little arsenal one or two ancient weapons that I'd never bothered with before.Our castle was full of old armor. My ancestors had fought in countless noble wars since the times of the Crusades with St. Louis. And hung on the walls above all this clattering junk were a good many lances, battleaxes, flails, and maces.It was a very large mace--that is, a spiked club--that I took with me that morning, and also a good-sized flail: an iron ball attached to a chain that could be swung with immense force at an attacker.Now remember this was the eighteenth century, the time when white-wigged Parisians tiptoed around in high-heeled satin slippers, pinched snuff, and dabbed at their noses with embroidered handkerchiefs.And here I was going out to hunt in rawhide boots and buckskin coat, with these ancient weapons tied to the saddle, and my two biggest mastiffs beside me in their spiked collars.That was my life. And it might as well have been lived in the Middle Ages. And I knew enough of the fancy-dressed travelers on the post road to feel it rather keenly. The nobles in the capital called us country lords "harecatchers." Of course we could sneer at them and call them lackeys to the king and queen. Our castle had stood for a thousand years, and not even the great Cardinal Richelieu in his war on our kind had managed to pull down our ancient towers. But as I said before, I didn't pay much attention to history.I was unhappy and ferocious as I rode up the mountain.I wanted a good battle with the wolves. There were five in the pack according to the villagers, and I had my guns and two dogs with jaws so strong they could snap a wolf's spine in an instant.Well, I rode for an hour up the slopes. Then I came into a small valley I knew well enough that no snowfall could disguise it. And as I started across the broad empty field towards the barren wood, I heard the first howling.Within seconds there had come another howling and then another, and now the chorus was in such harmony that I couldn't tell the number of the pack, only that they had seen me and were signaling to each other to come together, which was just what I had hoped they would do.I don't think I felt the slightest fear then. But I felt something, and it caused the hair to rise on the backs of my arms. The countryside for all its vastness seemed empty. I readied my guns. I ordered my dogs to stop their growling and follow me, and some vague thought came to me that I had better get out of the open field and into the woods and hurry.My dogs gave their deep baying alarm. I glanced over my shoulder and saw the wolves hundreds of yards behind me and streaking straight towards me over the snow. Three giant gray wolves they were, coming on in a line.I broke into a run for the forest.It seemed I would make it easily before the three reached me, but wolves are extremely clever animals, and as I rode hard for the trees I saw the rest of the pack, some five full-grown animals, coming out ahead of me to my left. It was an ambush, and I could never make the forest in time. And the pack was eight wolves, not five as the villagers had told me.Even then I didn't have sense enough to be afraid. I didn't ponder the obvious fact that these animals were starving or they'd never come near the village. Their natural reticence with men was completely gone.I got ready for battle. I stuck the flail in my belt, and with the rifle I took aim. I brought down a big male yards away from me and had time to reload as my dogs and the pack attacked each other. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • #1
  • New York Times
  • Bestselling author - Surrender to fiction's greatest creature of the night - Book II of the Vampire Chronicles
  • The vampire hero of Anne Rice’s enthralling novel is a creature of the darkest and richest imagination. Once an aristocrat in the heady days of pre-revolutionary France, now a rock star in the demonic, shimmering 1980s, he rushes through the centuries in search of others like him, seeking answers to the mystery of his eternal, terrifying exsitence. His is a mesmerizing story—passionate, complex, and thrilling.
  • Praise for
  • The Vampire Lestat
  • “Frightening, sensual . . . Anne Rice will live on through the ages of literature. . . . To read her is to become giddy as if spinning through the mind of time, to become lightheaded as if our blood is slowly being drained away.”
  • San Francisco Chronicle
  • “Fiercely ambitious, nothing less than a complete unnatural history of vampires.”
  • The Village
  • Voice
  • “Brilliant . . . its undead characters are utterly alive.”
  • —The New York Times Book Review
  • “Luxuriantly created and richly told.”
  • —The Cleveland Plain Dealer

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(1.7K)
★★★★
25%
(714)
★★★
15%
(428)
★★
7%
(200)
-7%
(-200)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

One of the best literary sequels of all time

Published 9 years after "Interview with the Vampire", this sequel tells us the story of Lestat, the villain of the first book. Opening in 1985, we read that Lestat is now a "rock and roll" star. (Note to Anne Rice: people have not said "rock and roll" for quite some time...) This seems a strange change for the brooding vampire of the first book, and it's not entirely successful to me as a reader. It may have worked better in 1985, but by now, it seems a bit unnecessary and kind of silly. Thankfully, this plot is only a framing device for the life story of Lestat de Lioncourt (and that's why I insist on giving this book 5 stars.) "Lestat" is quite a different novel from the first in the series, but we are dealing with an entirely different vampire here than the depressed and vulnerable Louis (who remains my favorite vampire). Lestat's story goes throughout the centuries, and he meets other vampire's who tell their tales. This book is a fantastic pageant that goes back to Ancient Egyptian times, to classical Rome, to pagan Europe, to the times of the French Revolution, to an old, decaying Parisian cemetery and even up to the present time. "The Vampire Lestat" is a much denser novel than the first (which has now become a sort of prelude or teaser to the entire Vampire Chronicles) but it's just as enjoyable. This book seems to be the hands down favorite of most readers of the Vampire Chronicles, but this is not an incentive to read these books out of order. "Interview with the Vampire" contains some very important passages and character development that are important to your understand of the second (especially in one of the final sections of "Lestat"). Amazingly, Rice maintains the continuity between the two novels, and doesn't make any of the "revisionist history" in the second seem false or forced. (Of note is the explanation as to why Lestat's father but not mother was in the first book... that revelation is a shocking one.) Another fun aspect is Lestat's reaction to reading Stoker's "Dracula". And fear not, some of our favorite characters from the first book do appear again... in unexpected ways. One of my favorite characters to be introduced into this book was Akasha, who is the Queen of the Damned of the third novel.
With The Vampire Lestat, Rice again does a wonderful job with her prose; it's a beautifully written, exciting and captivating book. I had no idea where the book was going from one moment to the next, and it never disappointed. Rice even successfully depicts twentieth century America as a fascinating place to be. I never thought a drugstore would seem so interesting. Read this book, but don't read it too fast... savor it, it's worth the time.
36 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Stop at page 550!

The book is great, I love Anne Rice and the Vampire Chronicles, BUT! In this particular edition, once you finish the book there is a taste of the newest one, Prince Lestat. In the first paragraph it ruins the next book of the series! Talk about a spoiler! I swear some people have no brains at all. Once you’re done with page 550, STOP!
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Don't believe any review over three stars

If, like me, after finishing 'Interview with the Vampire' you are looking forward to reading more about the indiscriminate killing monster known as Lestat then forget it. In an abrupt change of style, Anne Rice portrays him as a big softy, who loves his mummy and cries alot. So, any memories you have from the the last book, for example of when he killed the child slave or danced with Claudias' rotting carcass of a mother, you can forget them right now. From page one he's set up as a goody-goody vampire who only chooses nasty people as victims. And as if this is not enough, the Author goes further in her hatchet job of destroying the imagery of the previous book, with her portrayal of Armand. Forget Antonio Banderas, or anything you read before, he's a child, and he's got an angel face. Can you believe this? Its almost like the book was written by someone else who had forgotten to read the first book, and the difference in writing style between the two books certainly shows. No, Vampire Lestat is a big disappointment. It steals classic characters from a previous book, then makes you lose all respect for them with page upon page of silly nonsense.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Yea!! I actually finished it!!!!

I cannot believe how many people love this book. The first paragraph was excellent! The last 20 pages were awesome!!! The rest of the book was so tedious to get through. I am actually celebrating that I survived it!!! OK, this is a little sarcastic, sorry Anne. When she does dialog between people, her writing is fantastic. When she goes into telling background situations, I've never read anything more borring. It's like writing about some guy walking over to a tree and taking five pages to describe every detail and every thought that went through his mind. Geeze, I'm really bummed. I thought I'd love this series. Interview With the Vampire was fabulous. I love Lestat. He is a great character. I just wish The Vampire Lestat, was more about Lestat. For some reason the way she wrote the other characters, I could not have cared less about them. Sorry, I have to disagree with the majority on this one.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Lestat is a cool guy! Excellent sequel !

About a third of this book is a retelling of Interview With the Vampire from Lestat's point of view. This series of books has done something that I have not experienced in any other book series - it turned me completely against a character in the first book and then later explained to me his motivations and viewpoint on events. When I finished Interview With the Vampire, I thought Lestat was the biggest asshole that ever walked on the face of the earth, but after having him tell his account of the relationship with Louis as he went along telling his story of how he was made into a vampire by Armand, made me understand why he acted the way he did. By the end, I was cheering for Lestat.

The story starts out in the late 1980's and Lestat is a rock star on MTV - everyone in the world thinks it is all an act - like Ozzy Ozbourne - so it is the perfect cover. We flash back to 18th century Paris - Lestat is a young French aristocrat, we then gradually move forward in time as Lestat's story unfolds to modern today. It is a facinating journey.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Overrated

The Vampire Lestat begins with a bang, ends with a bang, but has some long dull stretches in between. This is the second book in Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles. To read this book, one must first read Interview with the Vampire. However, once one has read Interview, one finds this book covering a lot of the same ground - at least thematically. Rice packs her novels to the brim with a lot of preachy, pop-existentialism, which gets very boring after a while; "life is meaningless..." yadda, yadda, yadda. It's a bit tiresome to hear this point expounded again and again - especially if one is not suffering from clinical depression and comes to realize that, difficult to accept as it may be, life isn't meaningless. We have not, as Nietzche said, moved "beyond good and evil." Good still exists, morality still exists, and - recent events notwithstanding - God is still in His Heaven.
One of the main gimmicks that Rice uses in her tails that is original is to tell her stories from the Vampire's perspective. This has advantages and disadvantages. She has rightly picked up on the fact that the heroes of Vampire tales are the vampires and not the "good guys." However, part of the charm of Dracula (who is ridiculed in this book) is that he is unapologetically bad - he simply is what he is, and does not make excuses for it. Therein, we have the central flaw of The Vampire Chronicles. By making excuses for their actions and blatantly asking us to sympathize with them, we actually lose sympathy with the vampires. They are living in "bad faith", to use Sartre's phrase. They are living (is it un-living?) in denial. How can one actually love Lestat when he is so head-over-heals in love with himself that there is no room for anyone else's affections. Throughout the book, he is constantly uttering pretentious bits of teenage nonsense like, "I've always rebelled against everything," and "I've always been good at everything." I kept waiting for him to say, "I'm a loner Dottie - a rebel!" It is only fitting to find out that Lestat started out as an actor - he has all of the actor's flaws: selfishness, self-centeredness, narcissism, vanity, cruelty... If Lestat was a real person today, he'd be one of those waiters with streaked hair who judges his acting ability by the number of visible abdominal muscles he has.
In the same vein, Rice is trying to pander to her audience. Past generations were `bad' or `ignorant' we are told, which is why Lestat took so long to rise from his grave. She is trying to kiss-up to young people by telling them they are so much wiser and more moral than their elders. As a member of the generation whose butt she is trying to kiss, I find this assessment to be laughable, and these passages sound like an older person trying to act young - sort of like when your parents try to act cool.
Now, all that having been said, the novel picks up considerably towards the end. We finally get some of the answers that we'd been told we never would. In doing so, we are introduced to the best new character - Akasha, The Queen of The Damned. Then we jump forward in time - covering the events in Interview from Lestat's perspective, and then on to modern day with Lestat as a "rock star" (although I doubt his concerts could really compare to Ozzy's). Old friends are reunited and just when things really begin to get interesting - the book ends, leaving me thinking, "I can't believe I'm actually going to get suckered into another one!"
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

a hypntoic modern gothic masterpiece

This novel is probably the best of Anne Rice's work, and most certainly the jewel of the Vampire Chronicles.
With poetic grandeur, Rice takes on a journey through the unflinchingly realistic death and borgeois carelessness of 18th century Paris... We follow young Lestat on his journey from the son of a French noble to a popular stage actor. And it is done with an eloquent, patient style that has personified Anne Rice and her novels. Here, her wrtiting is in top form!
The book, although comnparitively long, is intenseley engrossing, and as we follow the life of the Vampire Lestat, we can't help but paint our own vampiric reality of this fictional biography in our own minds. Lestat is done in such a way that his author's voice (the book is an "auto-biography") is genuine and believable...not only that, it is hypnotic and beguiling.
We are shown the depravity of the wretched cult of vampires led by Armand underneath the "Les Innocents" cemetary...we follow Lestat and his companion (mother) Gabrielle on their journey through the VERY VIVID old world (Europe) of the 18th century.
Perhaps the most compelling character in the story is Marius, a 2,000 year old vampire who recounts the tale of his own "birth into darkness" to Lestat. We are shown awesome sights in Marius' biography within a biography.
It is a must-read for any vampire-fan, or fan of gothic literature. I will say this; the ending is a very artful cliff-hanger...you'll be compelled to read "The Queen of the Damned"...
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Powerful and Moving, though Wordy, Tale!

I have some mixed feelings about Anne Rice's "The Vampire Lestat", but all things considered, I truly believe it is a worthwhile read. In this follow-up to "Interview with the Vampire", we are told the life story of Lestat de Lioncourt, and I was bothered by the inconsistencies between the two books. Lestat tells us that Louis has lied about all kinds of things, and the cruel and cold-hearted villain we came to know and love in "Interview with the Vampire" becomes a moral, soft-hearted, and tortured soul, always trying to do the right thing and find the answers to life's mysteries. Hmmm. I think if I had not read "Interview with the Vampire", I would have found "The Vampire Lestat" far more enjoyable, because then I would have been blissfully unaware of the transformation of Lestat's character. With that said though, "The Vampire Lestat" is a compelling, if lengthy and somewhat verbose, tale, and in the end I was glad I read it, because it has many redeeming qualities.
The book purports to be Lestat's autobiography, and we are taken on a lush and erotic journey through Lestat's long and eventful life. From his youth as the son of a marquis in pre-Revolutionary France when Lestat befriends a troubled violinist named Nicolas, to the crowded streets of Paris where his life is changed forever by a solitary vampire named Magnus, who gives Lestat the dark gift before deserting him forever. Shocked and amazed by what has befallen him, Lestat, begins to learn what it is to be a vampire. Questions about the why and how of what he has become torment Lestat, but there is nobody for him to turn to. Lestat's story has many twists and turns; as he saves his mother from her deathbed with his immortal kiss, meets a hostile coven of Satan-worshipping vampires living under a cemetery, and ultimately goes off on a quest for a legendary ancient vampire named Marius in hopes of finding some answers to the questions that haunt him. And through it all we are treated to Rice's memorable and moving prose. However, the author's tendency to become overly descriptive is in evidence here, and there were some portions of the book that were a bit hard to get through.
As I've already stated, my feelings about "The Vampire Lestat" are a bit ambiguous. But despite my criticisms of this book, I actually did like it a lot. Lestat's story is affecting, intriguing, and entertaining, and in the end I could honestly say that I enjoyed it. Many people adore this book, and it's easy to see why, and on the other hand quite a few people hate it, and I can understand their point of view too. I can't guarantee anything to anyone picking up this book, because Anne Rice's writing is hypnotic and beautiful to some, and deadly boring to others. Personally, I would have been sorry if I'd missed "The Vampire Lestat", since I really did become quite engrossed in Lestat's tale. So give this book a try and see what you think, you may just be pleasantly surprised!
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Could've been truly great.

It really could have been a masterpiece... if only it wasn't called The Vampire Lestat and settled for The Vampire Marcus or The Vampire John or The Vampire George or whatever...

The person we follow in this story is simply not Lestat. It is a beefed up version of Louis. Rice goes to great distances to make us believe that it is the same Lestat, but fails miserably. She even takes a puke on Interview With The Vampire by saying that Louis was utterly wrong on at least three important points and that all those innocent people Lestat killed for fun were actualy murderers, thiefs and scoundrels.

And why? So that it could say The Vampire Lestat on the book cover? I truly don't know and don't care if it is a cash in or not. I just wanted the real Lestat back.

It is still a good, fun book with lots of great characters and an above-average plot. But it is all clouded by the fact our narrator is not an egoistical, stupid, vain and utterly evil person he was in Interview With The Vampire, but some miserable copy of Louis. If he was the person he was in Interview, it would've truly made for an unique experience. Unfortunately, it took away a huge chunk of fun and interest and turned a great book into a merely above-average one.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

One of the best

This book was beyond anything that I have ever read before. I've always loved vampire novels, and Ann Rice is one of the best authors I've read. Like many people, I started to gain interest in Ann Rice's books after watching Interview with the Vampire. But I finally chose to read the books when I saw the most recent movie Queen of the Damned. As I was reading the book, it was easy to imagine exactly what kind of person (so to speak) Lestat really is. Lestat suffers from the one thing that almost all humans fear; loneliness. I guess that's what makes him different from most vampires. He still has some of his human moralities left. Nevertheless, Rice's descriptions in everything that is going on is so vivid, you'd swear that Lestat is real. However, some parts of the story made me loss interest and I just skimmed the pages. I guess you can be a little over descriptive. Overall, it was a great book to read and I plan on reading the next one.
6 people found this helpful