The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human
The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human book cover

The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human

Hardcover – January 1, 2012

Price
$31.79
Format
Hardcover
Pages
248
Publisher
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0547391403
Dimensions
5.75 x 0.75 x 8.5 inches
Weight
13.6 ounces

Description

Jonathan Gottschall on The Storytelling Animal What is the storytelling animal? Only humans tell stories. Story sets us apart. For humans, story is like gravity: a field of force that surrounds us and influences all of our movements. But, like gravity, story is so omnipresent that we are hardly aware of how it shapes our lives. I wanted to know what science could tell us about humanity's strange, ardent love affair with story. What inspired you to write this book? I was speeding down the highway on a gorgeous autumn day, cheerfully spinning through the FM dial, and a country music song came on. My normal response to this sort of catastrophe is to turn the channel as quickly as possible. But that day, for some reason, I decided to listen. In "Stealing Cinderella," Chuck Wicks sings about a young man asking for his sweetheart's hand in marriage. The girl's father makes the young man wait in the living room, where he notices photos of his sweetheart as a child, "She was playing Cinderella/ She was riding her first bike/ Bouncing on the bed and looking for a pillow fight/ Running through the sprinkler/ With a big popsicle grin/ Dancing with her dad, looking up at him. . ." And the young man suddenly realizes that he is taking something precious from the father: he is stealing Cinderella. Before the song was over I was crying so hard that I had to pull off the road. I sat there for a long time feeling sad about my own daughters growing up to abandon me. But I was also marveling at how quickly Wicks's small, musical story had melted me into sheer helplessness. I wrote the book partly in an effort to understand what happened to me that day. But don't you worry that science could explain away the magic of story? I get this question a lot. The answer is "No! A thousand times, no!" Science adds to wonder; it doesn't dissolve it. Scientists almost always report that the more they discover about their subject, the more lovely and mysterious it becomes. That's certainly what I found in my own research. The whole experience left me in awe of our species--of this truly odd primate that places story (and other forms of art) at the very center of its existence. Children come up a lot in this book, including your own children. . . Yes, I spent a lot of time observing my two daughters (in this I took my cue from Darwin, who was a doting father, but not shy about collecting observational data on his large brood). I got lucky. My girls happened to be 4 and 7 during the main period that I was working on my book. This is the golden period of children's pretend play. And I was able to observe them spontaneously creating these fantastic wonder-worlds, with these elaborate and dangerous plots. I noticed that my girls spent almost all of their awake time in various kinds of make-believe. And I was invited to enter those worlds myself, to play the roles of princes and Ken dolls and monsters. I learned a lot about the nature of story from my girls. Story and other forms of art are often seen as products of culture. But this perspective is one-sided. Story blooms naturally in a child--it is as effortless and reflexive as breathing. Are dreams a form of storytelling? Yes, they are. Dreams are, like children's make-believe, a natural and reflexive form of storytelling. Researchers conventionally define dreams as "intense sensorimotor hallucinations with a narrative structure." Dreams are, in effect, night stories: they focus on a protagonist--usually the dreamer--who struggles to achieve desires. Researchers can't even talk about dreams without dragging in the basic vocabulary of English 101: plot, theme, character, scene, setting, point of view, perspective. The most conservative estimates suggest that we dream in a vivid, story-like way for more than six solid years out of a seventy-year lifespan. So dreams are definitely part of the evolutionary riddle of storytelling. What is the future of story? In the digital age, people are reading less fiction, but this is because they've found new ways to jam extra story into their lives--on average we watch five hours of TV per day, listen to hours of songs, and spend more and more time playing story-centric video games. I think we are seeing, in video games, the birth of what will become the 21st century's dominant form of storytelling. The fantasy lands of online games like World of Warcraft attract tens of millions of players, who spend an average of 20–30 hours per week adventuring in interactive story. Players describe the experience of these games as "being inside a novel as it is being written." In upcoming decades, as computing power increases exponentially, these virtual worlds are going to become so attractive that we will be increasingly reluctant to unplug. So the real danger isn't that story will disappear from our lives. It is that story will take them over completely. A jaunty and insightful new book...[that] celebrate[s] our compulsion to storify everything around us. xa0(New York Times Sunday Book Review, Editor's Choice ) "[An] insightful yet breezily accessible exploration of the power of storytelling and its ability to shape our lives...[that is] packed with anecdotes and entertaining examples from pop culture ." The Boston Globe "The Storytelling Animal is informative, but also a lot of fun .... Anyone who has wondered why stories affect us the way they do will find a new appreciation of our collective desire to be spellbound in thisxa0fascinatingxa0book ." BookPage "Stories are the things that make us human, and this book's absorbing, accessible blend of science and story shows us exactly why." Minneapolis Star Tribune. "This is a work of popular philosophy and social theory written by an obviously brilliant undergraduate teacher. The gift for the example is everywhere. A punchy line appears on almost every page." The San Francisco Chronicle An " insightful consideration of all things story. "— Library Journal "A lively pop-science overview of the reasons why we tell stories and why storytelling will endure ..[Gottschall's] snapshots of the worlds of psychology, sleep research and virtual reality are larded with sharp anecdotes and jargon-free summaries of current research ... Gottschall brings a light tough to knotty psychological matters, and he’s a fine storyteller himself." — Kirkus Reviews "They say we spend multiple hours immersed in stories every day. Very few of us pause to wonder why. Gottschall lays bare this quirk of our species with deft touches , and he finds that our love of stories is its own story, and one of the grandest tales out there—the story of what it means to be human."— Sam Kean , author of The Disappearing Spoon: And Other True Tales of Madness, Love, and the History of the World from the Periodic Table of the Elements "Story is not the icing, it’s the cake! Gottschall eloquently tells you ‘how come’ in his well researched new book."— Peter Guber , CEO, Mandalay Entertainment and author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Tell To Win "This is a quite wonderful book. It grips the reader with both stories and stories about the telling of stories, then pulls it all together to explain why storytelling is a fundamental human instinct." — Edward O. Wilson, University Research Professor and Honorary Curator in Entomology, Harvard University "Stories are everywhere. Stories make us buy; they make us cry; they help us pass the time, even when we're asleep. In this enthralling book, Jonathan Gottschall traces the enduring power of stories back to the evolved habits of mind. He reveals the ways in which we are trapped, for better or worse, in a world of narrative. If you are in the storytelling business — and aren't we all? — you must read this book." —Jonah Lehrer " The Storytelling Animal is a delight to read . It's boundlessly interesting , filled with great observations and clever insights aboutu3000television, books, movies, videogames, dreams, children, madness, evolution, morality, love, and more. And it's beautifully written—fittingly enough, Gottschall is himself a skilled storyteller."— Paul Bloom, Professor of Psychology at Yale and author of How Pleasure Works "Like the magnificent storytellers past and present who furnish him here with examples and inspiration, Jonathan Gottschall takes a timely and fascinating but possibly forbidding subject — the new brain science and what it can tell us about the human story-making impulse — and makes of it an extraordinary and absorbing intellectual narrative. The scrupulous synthesis of art and science here is masterful; the real-world stakes high; the rewards for the reader numerous, exhilarating, mind-expanding." — Terry Castle, Walter A. Haas Professor in the Humanities, Stanford University From the Inside Flap Humans live in landscapes of make-believe. We spin fantasies. We devour novels, films, and plays. Even sporting events and criminal trials unfold as narratives. Yet the world of story has long remained an undiscovered and unmapped country. Itx92s easy to say that humans are x93wiredx94 for story, but why ?In this delightful and original book, Jonathan Gottschall offers the first unified theory of storytelling. He argues that stories help us navigate lifex92s complex social problemsx97just as flight simulators prepare pilots for difficult situations. Storytelling has evolved, like other behaviors, to ensure our survival.Drawing on the latest research in neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology, Gottschall tells us what it means to be a storytelling animal. Did you know that the more absorbed you are in a story, the more it changes your behavior? That all children act out the same kinds of stories, whether they grow up in a slum or a suburb? That people who read more fiction are more empathetic?Of course, our story instinct has a darker side. It makes us vulnerable to conspiracy theories, advertisements, and narratives about ourselves that are more x93truthyx94 than true. National myths can also be terribly dangerous: Hitlerx92s ambitions were partly fueled by a story.But as Gottschall shows in this remarkable book, stories can also change the world for the better. Most successful stories are moralx97they teach us how to live, whether explicitly or implicitly, and bind us together around common values. We know we are master shapers of story. The Storytelling Animal finally reveals how stories shape us . x93They say we spend multiple hours immersed in stories every day. Very few of us pause to wonder why. Gottschall lays bare this quirk of our species with deft touches, and he finds that our love of stories is its own story, and one of the grandest tales out therex97the story of what it means to be human.x94 x97 Sam Kean , author of The Disappearing Spoon: And Other True Tales of Madness, Love, and the History of the World from the Periodic Table of the Elements x93Story is not the icing, itx92s the cake! Gottschall eloquently tells you x91how comex92 in his well-researched new book.x94 x97 Peter Guber , CEO, Mandalay Entertainment and author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Tell to Win x93This is a quite wonderful book. It grips the reader with both stories and stories about the telling of stories, then pulls it all together to explain why storytelling is a fundamental human instinct.x94x97 Edward O. Wilson , University Research Professor and Honorary Curator in Entomology, Harvard University x93A fascinating and riveting account of why we all love a story.x94x97 Michael Gazzaniga , Professor of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, and author of Human and Whox92s in Charge? x93 The Storytelling Animal is a delight to read. Itx92s boundlessly interesting, filled with great observations and clever insights about television, books, movies, videogames, dreams, children, madness, evolution, morality, love, and more. And itx92s beautifully writtenx97fittingly enough, Gottschall is himself a skilled storyteller.x94 x97 Paul Bloom , Professor of Psychology, Yale University, and author of How Pleasure Works x93Stories are everywhere. Stories make us buy; they make us cry; they help us pass the time, even when wex92re asleep. In this enthralling book, Jonathan Gottschall traces the enduring power of stories back to the evolved habits of mind. He reveals the ways in which we are trapped, for better or worse, in a world of narrative. If you are in the storytelling businessx97and arenx92t we all?x97you must read this book.x94 x97 Jonah Lehrer , author of How We Decide and Imagine Jonathan Gottschall teaches English at Washington & Jefferson College and is one of the leading figures in the movement toward a more scientific humanities. The author or editor of five scholarly books, Gottschall’s work has been prominently featured in the New York Times Magazine , Scientific American , and the Chronicle of Higher Education , among others. Steven Pinker has called him "a brilliant young scholar" whose writing isxa0"unfailingly clear, witty, and exciting." Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. PREFACE Statisticians agree that if they could only catch some immortal monkeys, lock them up in a room with a typewriter, and get them to furiously thwack keys for a long, long time, the monkeys would eventually flail out a perfect reproduction of Hamlet —with every period and comma and “’sblood” in its proper place. It is important that the monkeys be immortal: statisticians admit that it will take a very long time.xa0xa0xa0Others are skeptical. In 2003, researchers from Plymouth University in England arranged a pilot test of the so-called infinite monkey theory—“pilot” because we still don’t have the troops of deathless supermonkeys or the infinite time horizon required for a decisive test. But these researchers did have an old computer, and they did have six Sulawesi crested macaques. They put the machine in the monkeys’ cage and closed the door.xa0xa0xa0The monkeys stared at the computer. They crowded it, murmuring. They caressed it with their palms. They tried to kill it with rocks. They squatted over the keyboard, tensed, and voided their waste. They picked up the keyboard to see if it tasted good. It didn’t, so they hammered it on the ground and screamed. They began poking keys, slowly at first, then faster. The researchers sat back in their chairs and waited.xa0xa0xa0A whole week went by, and then another, and still the lazy monkeys had not written Hamlet , not even the first scene. But their collaboration had yielded some five pages of text. So the proud researchers folded the pages in a handsome leather binding and posted a copyrighted facsimile of a book called Notes Towards the Complete Works of Shakespeare on the Internet . I quote a representative passage:xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 Ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssnaaaaaaaaaxa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasssssssssssssssssfssssfhgggggggsssxa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 Assfssssssgggggggaaavmlvvssajjjlssssssssssssssssaxa0xa0xa0The experiment’s most notable discovery was that Sulawesi crested macaques greatly prefer the letter s to all other letters in the alphabet, though the full implications of this discovery are not yet known. The zoologist Amy Plowman, the study’s lead investigator, concluded soberly, “The work was interesting, but had little scientific value, except to show that ‘the infinite monkey theory’ is flawed.”xa0xa0xa0In short, it seems that the great dream of every statistician—of one day reading a copy of Hamlet handed over by an immortal supermonkey—is just a fantasy.xa0xa0xa0But perhaps the tribe of statisticians will be consoled by the literary scholar Jiro Tanaka, who points out that although Hamlet wasn’t technically written by a monkey, it was written by a primate, a great ape to be specific. Sometime in the depths of prehistory, Tanaka writes, “a less than infinite assortment of bipedal hominids split off from a not-quite infinite group of chimp-like australopithecines, and then another quite finite band of less hairy primates split off from the first motley crew of biped. And in a very finite amount of time, [one of] these primates did write Hamlet.”xa0xa0xa0And long before any of these primates thought of writing Hamlet or Harlequins or Harry Potter stories—long before these primates could envision writing at all—they thronged around hearth fires trading wild lies about brave tricksters and young lovers, selfless heroes and shrewd hunters, sad chiefs and wise crones, the origin of the sun and the stars, the nature of gods and spirits, and all the rest of it.xa0xa0xa0Tens of thousands of years ago, when the human mind was young and our numbers were few, we were telling one another stories. And now, tens of thousands of years later, when our species teems across the globe, most of us still hew strongly to myths about the origins of things, and we still thrill to an astonishing multitude of fictions on pages, on stages, and on screens—murder stories, sex stories, war stories, conspiracy stories, true stories and false. We are, as a species, addicted to story. Even when the body goes to sleep, the mind stays up all night, telling itself stories.xa0xa0xa0This book is about the primate Homo fictus (fiction man), the great ape with the storytelling mind. You might not realize it, but you are a creature of an imaginative realm called Neverland. Neverland is your home, and before you die, you will spend decades there. If you haven’t noticed this before, don’t despair: story is for a human as water is for a fish—all-encompassing and not quite palpable. While your body is always fixed at a particular point in space-time, your mind is always free to ramble in lands of make-believe. And it does.xa0xa0xa0Yet Neverland mostly remains an undiscovered and unmapped country. We do not know why we crave story. We don’t know why Neverland exists in the first place. And we don’t know exactly how, or even if, our time in Neverland shapes us as individuals and as cultures. In short, nothing so central to the human condition is so incompletely understood. The idea for this book came to me with a song. I was driving down the highway on a brilliant fall day, cheerfully spinning the FM dial. A country music song came on. My usual response to this sort of catastrophe is to slap franticly at my radio in an effort to make the noise stop. But there was something particularly heartfelt in the singer’s voice. So, instead of turning the channel, I listened to a song about a young man asking for his sweetheart’s hand in marriage. The girl’s father makes the young man wait in the living room, where he stares at pictures of a little girl playing Cinderella, riding a bike, and “running through the sprinkler with a big popsicle grin / Dancing with her dad, looking up at him.” The young man suddenly realizes that he is taking something precious from the father: he is stealing Cinderella.xa0xa0xa0Before the song was over, I was crying so hard that I had to pull off the road. Chuck Wicks’s “Stealing Cinderella” captures something universal in the sweet pain of being a father to a daughter and knowing that you won’t always be the most important man in her life.xa0xa0xa0I sat there for a long time feeling sad, but also marveling at how quickly Wicks’s small, musical story had melted me—a grown man, and not a weeper—into sheer helplessness. How odd it is, I thought, that a story can sneak up on us on a beautiful autumn day, make us laugh or cry, make us amorous or angry, make our skin shrink around our flesh, alter the way we imagine ourselves and our worlds. How bizarre it is that when we experience a story—whether in a book, a film, or a song—we allow ourselves to be invaded by the teller. The story maker penetrates our skulls and seizes control of our brains. Chuck Wicks was in my head—squatting there in the dark, milking glands, kindling neurons.xa0xa0xa0This book uses insights from biology, psychology, and neuroscience to try to understand what happened to me on that bright fall day. I’m aware that the very idea of bringing science—with its sleek machines, its cold statistics, its unlovely jargon—into Neverland makes many people nervous. Fictions, fantasies, dreams—these are, to the humanistic imagination, a kind of sacred preserve. They are the last bastion of magic. They are the one place where science cannot—should not—penetrate, reducing ancient mysteries to electrochemical storms in the brain or the timeless warfare among selfish genes. The fear is that if you explain the power of Neverland, you may end up explaining it away. As Wordsworth said, you have to murder in order to dissect. But I disagree.xa0xa0xa0Consider the ending of Cormac McCarthy’s novel The Road . McCarthy follows a man and his young son as they walk across a dead world, a “scabland,” in search of what they most need to survive: food and human community. I finished the novel flopped in a square of sunlight on my living room carpet, the way I often read as a boy. I closed the book and trembled for the man and the boy, and for my own short life, and for my whole proud, dumb species.xa0xa0xa0At the end of The Road , the man is dead, but the boy lives on with a small family of “good guys.” The family has a little girl. There is a shard of hope. The boy may yet be a new Adam, and the girl may yet be his Eve. But everything is precarious. The whole ecosystem is dead, and it’s not clear whether the people can survive long enough for it to recover. The novel’s final paragraph whisks us away from the boy and his new family, and McCarthy takes leave of us with a beautifully ambiguous poem in prose.Once there were brook trout in the streams in the mountains. You could see them standing in the amber current where the white edges of their fins wimpled softly in the flow. They smelled of moss in your hand. Polished and muscular and torsional. On their backs were vermiculate patterns that were maps of the world in its becoming. Maps and mazes. Of a thing which could not be put back. Not be made right again. In the deep glens where they lived all things were older than man and they hummed of mystery.xa0xa0xa0What does that mean? Is it a eulogy for a dead world that will never burgeon again with life, or is it a map of the “world in its becoming”? Might the boy still be alive, out in the living woods with the good guys, fishing trout? Or is the boy gone, slaughtered for meat? No science can answer these questions.xa0xa0xa0But science can help explain why stories like The Road have such power over us. The Storytelling Animal is about the way explorers from the sciences and humanities are using new tools, new ways of thinking, to open up the vast terra incognita of Neverland. It’s about the way that stories—from TV commercials to daydreams to the burlesque spectacle of professional wrestling—saturate our lives. It’s about deep patterns in the happy mayhem of children’s make-believe and what they tell us about story’s prehistoric origins. It’s about how fiction subtly shapes our beliefs, behaviors, ethics—how it powerfully modifies culture and history. It’s about the ancient riddle of the psychotically creative night stories we call dreams. It’s about how a set of brain circuits—usually brilliant, sometimes buffoonish—force narrative structure on the chaos of our lives. It’s also about fiction’s uncertain present and hopeful future. Above all, it’s about the deep mysteriousness of story. Why are humans addicted to Neverland? How did we become the storytelling animal? Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Humans live in landscapes of make-believe. We spin fantasies. We devour novels, films, and plays. Even sporting events and criminal trials unfold as narratives. Yet the world of story has long remained an undiscovered and unmapped country. It’s easy to say that humans are “wired” for story, but
  • why
  • ?In this delightful and original book, Jonathan Gottschall offers the first unified theory of storytelling. He argues that stories help us navigate life’s complex social problems—just as flight simulators prepare pilots for difficult situations. Storytelling has evolved, like other behaviors, to ensure our survival.Drawing on the latest research in neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology, Gottschall tells us what it means to be a storytelling animal. Did you know that the more absorbed you are in a story, the more it changes your behavior? That all children act out the same kinds of stories, whether they grow up in a slum or a suburb? That people who read more fiction are more empathetic?Of course, our story instinct has a darker side. It makes us vulnerable to conspiracy theories, advertisements, and narratives about ourselves that are more “truthy” than true. National myths can also be terribly dangerous: Hitler’s ambitions were partly fueled by a story.But as Gottschall shows in this remarkable book, stories can also change the world for the better. Most successful stories are moral—they teach us how to live, whether explicitly or implicitly, and bind us together around common values. We know we are master shapers of story.
  • The Storytelling Animal
  • finally reveals how stories shape
  • us
  • .

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(272)
★★★★
25%
(227)
★★★
15%
(136)
★★
7%
(64)
23%
(209)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The Power of Storytelling . . . Excellent, Must-Read

First, the short version: Excellent book on the power of story. Fascinating and insightful, a must read if you have any interest at all in the subject matter. One of the best books I have read in a long time . . . fresh, original, and enlightening.

Now the long version: The Storytelling Animal is a fascinating account of the power of story. The author has included many original anecdotes and drawn from hundreds of sources to create a compelling account of how stories make us human.

Each chapter covers a different aspect of this strange phenomenon, from dreams to memoirs to the future of storytelling.

* The Witchery of Story: This chapter is covers the power of story throughout history, geography, and our daily life. The quote that begins the chapter is one of my favorites:

"Lord! When you sell a man a book you don't sell him just twelve ounces of paper and ink and glue - you sell him a whole new life. Love and friendship and humour and ships at sea by night - there's all heaven and earth in a book, in a real book I mean." Christopher Morley, Parnassus on Wheels.

* The Riddle of Fiction: Why do we need story? What drives us, what sense does it make? While I did not agree with everything the author concludes here, the theories he presents are insightful. The account he gives of children and the pretend play they engage in is well worth reading, one of my favorite parts of the book.
Hell Is Story-Friendly: Why do we crave stories with trouble in them?

"Stories the world over are almost always about people (or personified animals) with problems. the people want something badly - to survive, to win the girl or the boy, to find a lost child. But big obstacles loom between the protagonists and what they want. Just about any story - comic, tragic, romantic - is about a protagonist's efforts to secure, usually at some cost, what he or she desire." (52)

* Night Story: Our brain does not stop telling stories, even while we are asleep.

* The Mind Is A Storyteller: Great chapter, really like the anecdote about James Tilly Matthews. Have added Illustrations of Madness and The Air Loom Gang to my wish list.

* The Moral Of The Story: The weakest chapter in the book. The author covers religion here and theorizes that humans invented religion as a means of advancing culture and fostering community. Does not really address the chapter title of where morals come from if this is true, why it could not be the other way around (we crave stories because some religion is true), etc.

* Ink People Change The World: Very good chapter - bottom line, fiction is powerful. Fiction can, and does, change more minds and influence more people than non-fiction. Story can break down our defenses and help us to empathize with and accept others (ex. Uncle Tom's Cabin).

* Life Stories: My favorite chapter in the book, worth buying and reading for just this chapter and the next. Memoirs can't be trusted, we fictionalize much of our own memory, and story is a central part of our past.

* The Future of Story:

"These are undeniably nervous times for people who make a living through story. the publishing, film, and television businesses are going through a period of painful change. but the essence of story is not changing. The technology of storytelling has evolved from oral tales, to clay tablets, to hand-lettered manuscripts, to printed books, to movies, televisions, Kindles, and iPhones. The wreaks havoc on business models, but it doesn't fundamentally change story. Fiction is as it was and ever will be: Character + Predicament + Attempted Extrication" (186)

In summary, this is an excellent book and well worth your money. I approach story from a different starting point than the author as a Christian, but there is still much to learn. C.S. Lewis talks about Christianity being more like math than a religion . . . underlying the fabric of our universe. The fact is that story pervades reality and the lives of humans. I'll end with the quote that the author uses to start the book:

"God made Man, because He loves stories." Elie Wiesel, The Gates Of The Forest
77 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Left wanting more...

The Storytelling Animal was a fun read, but not the must read I was hoping for. I didn't find anything surprising, or experience any of those WOW moments, when the author brings forth an insight that I had never considered. What I did find interesting was how the author brought all of the different forms of story together. He presents a comprehensive picture of how story permeates every aspect of our lives, and does it in a way that is very readable.

I was familiar with much of the evidence presented in the section of the book dealing with the importance of story in child development. It was an effective presentation, but I was hard pressed to find any new conclusions to draw either from the studies cited or the anecdotal evidence provided.

Perhaps my favorite parts of the book were the ones dealing with our own personal narratives. Our eternal quest to make ourselves the protagonist in our own story, and the unreliability of memory made for interesting reading. Looking at these aspects as merely different forms of storytelling was intriguing and I wanted more information. Unfortunately, not enough was provided.

This was a well written, quick read that will whet the appetite of fiction lovers such as myself, but in the end was kind of insubstantial. I was hoping for something to challenge the common conceptions, and instead experienced a gentle reinforcement of quite a few things I already knew.
62 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Unlike us cats are not "story-telling animals"

This book has serious flaws.

First "thematic drift". From describing how "Stories make us human" - a cognitive theme - the author floats blithely toward an analysis of "stories" per se and worries about their future. Only on the last two pages does he confront the true human predicament: "The real threat isn't that the story will fade out of human life in the future; it's that story will take it over completely" (p. 198). Indeed, our constant storytelling may soon become maladaptive, particularly if it becomes self-referential and oneiric - that is detached from reality. Some reflection would have been welcome.

The second is that the content to patter ratio is quite low: the author revels at length in lurid details of stories that have been fabricated by this or that eccentric or even crazy person. He is wasting my time. I don't need priming.

Finally, the author's discussion of the role of "stories" in human cognition is basic, and to me, quite unsatisfactory. It is not the author's fault, but the profession's. In their quest for animal precursors of our complex brain, the profession fails to confront, or at least address, the uniqueness of the human mind.

Our brain is not just an oversized cat's brain - though we share with the cat the faculty of dreaming (pg. 76 ff.). It is a learning device, which has allowed us to switch from genetic to cultural evolution and go from hominid to human in probably less than 100'000 years - nothing at all in evolutionary terms. If dreams are functional, a cat's dream must be fundamentally different from ours, for our brain is dominated by (silent) culture, and one of its main functions is its acquisition. So the idea that dreams reflect training in a "simulator", i.e. are repetitive (rather than in some way acquisitive or elaborative), would seem hardly to stand up.
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Engaging book, but acts as an introduction to the topic

Jonathan Gottschall looks into how and why humans are pulled to stories, making various cases and presenting interesting theories along the way. In my opinion, this book is a solid introduction to the subject, but not a fleshed out exploration. In this review, I would like to go through the most engaging parts for me and why I have come to certain conclusions or opinions.

Neverland never leaves us
The book begins by setting up the stage for this fascinating topic. It starts guiding us through various ideas (and even a test) to prove how bewitching stories can be. Gottschall uses the idea of Neverland throughout the book and it is mentioned in the first chapter. He starts by noting that children love spending time creating stories and enacting them. Then, he writes, "We may leave the nursery, with its toy trucks and dress-up clothes, but we never stop pretending. We just change how we do it. Novels, dreams, films, and fantasies are provinces of Neverland." He points out that humans never stop their involvement with stories. This seems quite true since there are many executives and producers that use story to move their customers and audiences. From the old ages where storytelling was mainly word-of-mouth to now where storytelling takes form in TV, movies, and even video games, stories have attracted us and I think they always will.

Why does Neverland never leave us?
The true question is why story has not been eliminated from human life through evolution. Basically, there has to be some sort of purpose for story. Otherwise, it would not have pursued to stay with us for so long. Some people think that fiction is used for a lot of things, like exercising the mind, passing down experiences, or forming a social glue among people. However, what if the alternative is considered? In my opinion, Gotschall introduces one of the most interesting theories here. Perhaps fiction is for nothing at all. It serves no purpose. At first, I thought this was a very poor argument to make. After all, story is all around us. If it was for nothing, wouldn't it have been eliminated through evolution, like mentioned before? Then, he makes his case, "Story may educate us, deepen us, and give us joy. Story may be one of the things that makes its most worthwhile to be human. But that doesn't mean story has a biological purpose." Although it seemed hard to believe (and I didn't want to think all my hours reading books were wasteful), it opened my mind. Maybe stories are for the sole purpose of enjoyment. We do many things that we have no value or need for, so maybe story is one of them.

Not just empathy, but sympathy
Humans cannot have stories if there is no conflict. If there is a story with no problems or interesting scenarios, the story is not at all engaging. The story does not elicit a response. Here, Gottschall finally started to bring in some science. As a current student in an introductory neuroscience class, I had been waiting for a neurological and scientific inquiry into why stories charm and move us. In one case, scientists used fMRI machines to monitor audience reaction. While watching the movie The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, it was discovered that "When Eastwood was angry, the viewer's brains looked angry, too. When the scene was sad, the viewers' brains also looked sad." With brain scanning, scientists were able to see that mirror neurons started firing in the brain. This caused the audience to have real, strong emotional responses that coincided with the story being told. They would not just empathize with the characters, but sympathize with them. However, this exploration into mirror neurons was short. There is not much more that Gottschall included, not that there needed to be any more with the point he was making. Still, I would have liked a little more meat, a little more scientific background into this topic. Also, there are some cases where audiences react more strongly to one scenario than another. It would have been great to learn the reasoning behind this. After all, not all movies elicit brilliant responses and become box office hits.

Jouvet's Cats
It is really strange to think about dreams, how they occur, why they occur, what causes one dream compared to another, etc. Gottschall explains some well known theories, such as one from Freud and the random activation theory (RAT). Jouvet's cats were intriguing to read about (again, my bias towards neuroscience coming into play). Jouvet severed the connection in the brain stem that signaled for paralysis in sleep in a few cats. During sleep, the cats would experience many scenarios of capturing prey or avoiding predators. Apparently, the dream world is filled with trouble. Again, there seems to be no story without conflict and since dreams are riddled with stories, they are riddled with conflict. Now that I think back to my own dreams (or those that I remember), it seems like they are all filled with trouble, sadness, or some sort of mission to resolve a dilemma. Perhaps dreams act as simulators then, preparing us for problems in the real world. This is something to think about.

To clean the chicken coop, of course!
The mind likes to invent stories, even if they are not real. An experiment conducted by Gazzaniga with split brain patients truly entertained me. Because of the way the visual system works, many split-brain patients were able to process images presented to both their left and right visual fields. One patient was shown a chicken's foot to the left and a snowy scene to the right. He was told to pick up two cards with pictures on them with both hands. He chose a chicken card with his right hand and a shovel card with his left hand. When asked why, he said he chose the chicken card because he saw a picture of a chicken's foot. However, he said he chose the shovel card not because he had seen the snowy scene, but because a chicken coop can be cleaned out with a shovel. It seems as if the initial images had been processed correctly in the brain and his hands chose the correct cards. However, the reasoning for one of the cards was a subtle lie. The brain didn't understand why the left hand had chosen a shovel due to the severed connection between the two halves of the brain. So, it made a reason up, to clean the chicken coop. This result was seen with other images and tests with different patients as well. It seems like the brain needs to create links. If it does not know the truth or reason behind something, it will create one. The brain will create stories naturally. This idea is quite scary... yet wondrous at the same time.

How fiction influences reality
I really liked reading the chapter on how "Ink People Change the World". It was interesting to learn of Adolf Hitler's fascination with Wagner's compositions and how they may have influenced his life of conquest. Although this chapter is more about speculation and theories that cannot be proven, I liked reading it since I do believe some stories compel and move people enough to make changes in reality. Gottschall says, "... when we are absorbing in a story, we drop our intellectual guard. We are moved emotionally, and this seems to leave us defenseless." Scientific explanations and research were not mentioned in abundance here. Yet, the idea that fiction can change real life doesn't seem difficult to believe after learning about how strongly we relate to it, feel it.

Style, Structure, and Overall Review
The book starts off at a great pace, building excitement for the coming chapters. It sets up the stage for this mysterious thing only humans seem to do: storytelling. Of course, the book is made more interesting by the way the author writes. His personality is clearly woven into the writing as he tries to interact with his readers through tests and relate to them through his personal recollections. I could do without some unnecessary pictures. At times, the images did not even have captions or explanations in the main text of the book. Still, Gottschall relays information well and the experiments mentioned were complimentary to the theories discussed. I do think the subject is too broad to be captured in this number of pages and at times, I needed to clarify which idea was proving what. Perhaps if the number of topics were reduced and more thorough investigating was done, I would personally be more satisfied with the organization and explanation of the material. Moreover, I wanted a more neurological background to our storytelling nature. I wanted to understand what exactly in our mind clicks and turns with story. I believe addressing this would give the book more substance, but it works as a great introduction to the material without it. In summary, this book gave a brief yet enjoyable introduction to our fascination with story. The author does try to research various materials, as shown in the long bibliography at the end. So, I would definitely recommend this book to a friend or anyone interested in taking a dip in the subject.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Unfortunately, it is merely an okay book

When I read a work of non-fiction, I am hoping for at least one of several possible results: Perhaps the book will be a riveting account of some real life exploit, such as Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer. Or I would like the book to teach me amazing things that I did not know, such Charles Mann's descriptions of the advanced civilizations that existed in the Americas before the arrival of Columbus - detailed in the book 1491. Or I want the book to be full of interesting stories that you can tell others, such as the Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell. Unfortunately, I felt that The Storytelling Animal lacks all of these aspects. At no point while reading did I say "Wow, cool!" or "I didn't know that!".

Gottschall's book reveals such unsurprising details that children in all cultures will sponstaneously play. Boys will act out stories full of violence and conflict, while girls pretend to be mothers and organize their house. Gottschall tells us that humans spend many hours dreaming while asleep, and that these dreams may be practice scenarios for humans should they encounter a dangerous situation (despite occasional happy dreams of sex or flying, Gottschall says that most of our dreams are scary nightmares.) Just like a ball player will constantly work on his game to develop his skills, perhaps our scary dreams are our brains constantly preparing us for dangerous situations.

We constantly tell ourselves stories, each of us is a protagonist in our own epic drama. Even the worst criminals and sociopaths in history have a personal narrative that justifies their horrendous deeds. Our memories are plastic, and fallible. Even under high stress situations, where we THINK we recall in perfect detail the dramatic events, tests prove that those memories are false - for example, George W Bush described seeing video of the first plane hitting the tower in the 9/11 attacks, but no such video existed. But the fact that our most trusted memories are edited or completely invented will hardly comes as a surprise to most readers.

In an early chapter, we learn that many great artists and writers are also afflicted with mental disturbances. Some of the finest storytellers suffer from various mental diseases - is creativity linked to madness? Gottschall relates the results of split brain experiments, when the corpus callosum (which connects the left and right lobe of the brain) is severed so that the right and left sides can no longer communicate. If information is fed to one side of the brain, causing the patient to take an action, followed by the doctor asking that patient why they just took that action, the patient will immediately invent a plausible but completely false story. I think I read about experiments such as these twenty five years ago - while interesting, I didn't learn anything new.

Another chapter tells us fiction and stories are powerful - humans will naturally gravitate to a good story; a great speaker is one who can spin a good tale. We are told that novels such as Uncle Tom's Cabin, A Christmas Carol and To Kill A Mockingbird have all resulted in major changes in society. Adolf Hitler was so enamored by an opera by Wagner called Rienzi that it unfortunately shaped the rest of his life. Hitler became a great speaker, telling stories about the persecuted German population and the Aryan race.

In the final chapter, Gottschall assures us that the demise of reading is great overstated. True, novels may disappear or morph into some other format, but humans will always tell stories, whether it is through video games or some undeveloped technology similar to Star Trek's holodeck. Again, it this material was presented but lacking in surprise. Overall, that was my opinion of this entire book - a so it was a disappointment for me, I had read a review on NPR that made it sound like this would be a better book. If you are interested in reading a better book about how our brains work, I thought Incognito by David Eaglemen was much more interesting.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not a Happy Ending

This book begins with startling questions, such as, "The riddle of fiction comes to this: Evolution is ruthlessly utilitarian. How has the seeming luxury of fiction not been eliminated from human life?" and picks up other equally thought-provoking ones along the way--why is storytelling fixated on trouble, why do boys and girls play in different ways, what is the link between madness and creativity and exactly what role do stories play in religion?

But instead of answers Gottschall begins slinging whatever he can lay his hands
on.

The book reminds me of something I would read in high school behind the cover of text books. A smattering of Wagner, Curb Your Enthusiasm, John Wayne Gacy
that grab your attention, but lead nowhere.

When I was done with "The Storytelling Animal," I remembered the original questions and, maybe I shouldn't have expected answers, but I certainly was lead to believe there were some.

- John Lehman, Rosebud Book Reviews.com
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Uneven in Terms of Reading Enjoyment

Much of this 200 page book I found interesting and, in some cases, fascinating. However, there were parts where I simply lost interest, thinking that Jonathan Gottschall didn't need to go into as much detail. I also found the photographs annoying in places. They are poorly done, even iconic ones, and often there on a page without comment. There is another issue I have will I will address later.
For me the book confirms what I have long suspected: all of us live much of our lives in the land of fantasy but we seldom talk about it, probably believing that others will think one is crazy to admit that truth. But I readily admit it. I go to sleep telling stories. When I walk I tell stories. We all tell stories when we are engaged in sex. And don't deny it!
The opening chapter, "The Witchery of Story" is a great way to get started into this book. That may sound like a rather obvious thing to write, but in this case it is especially true. We don't want to live the lives of those who inhabit the pages of stories do we? But fiction would not sell if it told of our ordinary lives. Right? The author sets this up well.
I think "The Riddle of Fiction," the second chapter is excellent with one very important exception. The author makes an assumption which apparently Vivian Paley, the author of "Boys and Girls" also made in her so-called research: that all boys gravitate toward play that involves guns and the like whereas all girls gravitate toward dolls, etc. That is just so not so! And I, as a gay man, ought to know. Maybe he meant to say--but he didn't--that a majority do. But I sought any opportunities I could to play with my sister's dolls, leaving my toy guns to gather dust. And I know of many lesbians who had little use for dolls but a lot of use for the activities straight boys were involved in. Today one would think an author would take this into consideration. Dr. Paley's research is old. But quite clearly the author is writing only from a heterosexual's point of view. So off went one star because of that! So there!
I teach writing and literature. So I found "The Mind Is a Storyteller," the fourth chapter, really fascinating, that a majority of authors are probably bipolar. That must be why my writing isn't as good as I would want it to be. I am no bipolar. But when I read the chapter, I put the pieces together along with the drug addiction and alcoholism we associate with so many of these writers: Capote, Hemingway, Tennessee Williams, Faulkner, Coleridge, Virginia Wolfe... A seemingly endless list. This sentence fascinates me: "Even college students who sign up for poetry-writing seminars have more bipolar traits than college students generally." There is no footnote for one to use to go to the author's souce, another flaw in the book in my opinion. And this: "People who are mentally ill tend to ahve more artists in their families...." Again no attribution to this statement although there is an extensive bibliography at the end.
I really enjoyed the last chapters: "The Moral of the Story," "Ink People Change the World," "Life Stories" and "The Future of Story." Indeed we do experience a lot of story telling today by a lot more people. That alone is fascinating given how our reading population is significantly less per capita than in the past. But not our media savy population who seek out all types of stories.
Chapter 6, "The Moral of the Story" isn't want you might expect, not about Aesop-type stories but instead about religions and their stories. Let me give you an example (page 119): "Guided by the holy myths, believers must imaginatively construct an alternate reality that stretches from the origins straight through an entire shadow world that teems with evidence of divinity. They must be able to decode the cryptic messages in the stars, the whistle of the wind, the entrails of goats, and the riddles of the prophets... Religion is the ultimate expression of story's dominion over our minds. The heros of sacred fiction do not respect the barrier between the pretend and the real." Then this two pages later: "We have religion because, by nature, we abhor explanatory vacuums. In sacred fiction, we find the master confabulations of the storytelling mind." Amen to that! And, of course, as the author then writes, the same is true of national myths. Just think about all the fictions of American history, the George Washington chopping down the cherry tree and not lying types of fictions. And then all of the virtues rewarded types of stories we have created. Humans just love to tell stories, often making claims about them being factual, all directed toward improving human behavior. But what is lacking in this chapter is how so many of these fictions have been the roots of wars.
Yes, I am convinced that I am right: much of our day and night is consumed in the stories we play out in our heads. Too bad we don't admit it and enjoy telling those tales, including the ones about the neighbor we would just love to see run down by a monster truck! And don't tell me all of us don't create those types of stories. All the time.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Poor Man's Malcolm Gladwell

Malcolm Gladwell has made a fortune writing books like this, stitching together a compelling and comprehensive narrative on phenomena like social virality ("Tipping Point"), deep understanding of subject matter ("Blink") and exceptional performance ("Outliers"). Gladwell delivers virtually no original research in any of these books. But what he does with genius is make all the existing material on the topic clear, coherent, and comprehensible, somehow turning it all into a ripping good yarn. In "The Storytelling Animal", English professor Jonathan Gottschall tackles a topic more ambitious and, I would argue, more profound than anything Gladwell has done to date: "How Stories Make Us Human."

Hobbes and Locke argued that "reason" is what makes us human. For Nietzsche it is the ability and willingness forsake self-preservation, to risk our lives over a matter of prestige. Gottschall argues here that it is our storytelling -- an innate, biological need for narrative in many aspects of our lives -- that makes us unique and so special. The evidence of "story" - a plotline with a predictable focus on overcoming obstacles or wrestling with conflict - is everywhere around us, the author says, and it isn't mere whimsy or non-sensical; rather it is evolutionary and biological process designed to help us learn and survive.

For instance, play is the "work" of children - and it's both gender specific (despite cultural changes) and usually dark and violent for both boys and girls, albeit in different ways. The central theme is that make believe and storytelling is a natural way to prepare children for adulthood. And once we reach adulthood we continue to grow and learn through story - only this time through fiction. Gottschall compares books and movies to a military flight simulator: it prepares us for the turbulent scenarios we may face in real life. Thus, just like play for children, fiction is essentially a form of emotional "play" that allows our brain to experience all the thrills of life in edgy situations without the physical repercussions of fighting wars or sleeping with other men's wives.

But it doesn't end with classic make believe. The author says that the need for stories and the lessons they bring are brought to us every night of the week - through our dreams. He says that dreams are similar to child's play and adult fiction in that the storylines are usually dark, dominated by recurring problems, trouble, and fear.

Even in our everyday, waking and working lives we have an irrepressible need to "fill in the blanks." If given limited information, we tend to make a comprehensible story out of what we have. The mind tries to see meaning and narrative in everything, which helps explain conspiracy theories, among other things, according to Gottschall, including religion. Religion is part of the human need for a narrative, a need for explanation, an abhorrence of a vacuum. What was most interesting to me is that "religion" is a human universal - all known societies have had gods - and that it may be because such beliefs are positive from an evolutionary perspective (Gottschall claims to be agnostic, but sees the evolutionary value of organized religion): it establishes a group, sets up group norms, and then establishes a powerful incentive system to adhere to the norms, both positive (salvation) and negative (eternal damnation). He suggests that the power of religion has extended to national narratives, most of which, according to the author, take on the theme of myth (e.g. Columbus, Squanto, Washington and the apple tree - or more morbidly, Nazi Germany) to promote an idealized view of moral behavior. Finally, the Gottschall writes that fiction, far from being immoral on a general level, has traditionally promoted cultural norms and usually reinforce moral behavior.

The power of story is staggering, Gottschall says. The ink of "The Illiad" propelled Alexander on his epic conquests; "Uncle Tom's Cabin" helped ignite the US Civil War; Wagner's opera "Rienzi" started Hitler on his path. Storylines are, indeed, powerful, as David Galula argued in his classic treatise on counter-insurgency warfare. The winner in any civil conflict is likely to be the side that possesses the most powerful, convincing narrative.

Gottschall is really on to something here. It's a fascinating topic and I am in complete concord with his general thesis that storytelling is integral to being human and, on balance, it is an incredible positive force in our lives. That said, I felt that Gottschall's work suffers the most, quite ironically, from a poorly crafted narrative in telling the story of narrative. "The Storytelling Animal" lacks the grace and memorability - the "sizzle" if you will - of a Gladwell book. Reading this book is like grabbing a fist full of sand. You can't possibly hold on to it all and the harder you try to grip what remains only makes it fall faster from your hand. I really hope Gladwell chooses this topic next...
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

This isn't science

At some point in this book, Jonathan Gottschall suggests that explanations of dreaming and neurocognative function waver between hypothesis eras and disproving eras. This simply isn't true. Rather, there are people who do science, like Stephen Pinker, and people who sit at home speculating, like Jonathan Gottschall. And that's a pretty important point here.

Because Mssr. Gottschall basically paints a portrait. He tells a story. He links a fair number of anecdotal pieces of information together into the speculative theory that fiction has a productive value for human beings. The problem is that he doesn't really look for anything that will disprove it. (Or if he did, and didn't find it, he certainly doesn't tell us.) For example, if dreaming is a practice session for real life events, are there people who do not dream? (Not just people who don't remember, but people who don't do it.) If so, do they suck at things in real life?

I have a problem with armchair philosophy that is more speculative than explanatory. Especially when, like this, it feels like someone has strung together a large number of simple pieces of data, threaded loosely by an explanation that is either not disprovable or one that someone is too lazy to really look for contradictory evidence to examine.

One final note. This is not a book that you should probably be handing around to youngsters. For example, there are (separate) photos of an adult film set and disrobed people. Neither of these are necessary for the point of the book. Similarly, there is a photograph of a clearly irritated young woman/teenage girl making obscene gestures at the camera. The worst part about all of this is that the pictures serve no point whatsoever. Occasionally, they are photographs of people in the story. (Needless, but at least topical.) Other times, the photograph is never referenced in the text. (Like the adult film set.) This leaves you scratching your head, wondering why they were there in the first place.

This book is poorly thought out. Or, perhaps, it was well-thought out, but poorly executed. In either case, I was somewhat disappointed. Competing theories were given short shrift, discarded out of hand, and only poorly detailed. Not much more attention was paid to the author's pet theory. (How could it be? The book has barely 200 pages of work, and intends to span most of human creative endeavor. Add about 400 more pages, and then get back to me.)
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Why Stories Matter

If you have ever viewed stories and storytelling as peripheral to life, this original book may change your mind.

Stores are central to our life is the book's premise. How are stories useful, why do they matter? And what is the future of stories? This fascinating book explores these questions.

Stories are so ubiquitous, we don't notice them, suggests author and English professor, Jonathan Gottschall, who is an effective storyteller himself.

Where are the stories? Hidden in plain sight. Worry (horror stories), daydreams (fantasy stories) the 10,000 favorite songs on our iPod are stories, gossip and jokes at the water cooler, commercials and jingles, sermons at church usually involve a story. Religions are based on a tradition of stories. Therapists are "script doctors" says Gottschall, who help us revise our life stories so we can become protagonists again.

Our work often involves crafting a compelling story whether we're a teacher, lawyer, salesperson or CEO. The 1900 hours of TV we watch each year are stories. Our mind is so addicted to stories, writes Gottschall, it stays up all night telling itself stories in the form of night dreams.

But why? "If evolution is ruthlessly utilitarian, why is there the seeming luxury of fiction?" asks Gottschall. Do stories help us rehearse for life? Why are stories fixated on trouble? What do stories do for us?

This is a question we tussled with in my writing classes at NYU with Adam Sexton who wrote [[ASIN:0071448772 Master Class in Fiction Writing: Techniques from Austen, Hemingway, and Other Greats]]. Adam continually stressed that stories need a central conflict that is personal, concrete and specific to be page-turners for us. But why do we like/need a central conflict or trouble to be compelling?

While stories involving trouble provide diverse functions which are examined in this book, there may be a current which runs deep in our thirst for storytelling.

If you look at the top ten best-selling books of 2011, perhaps there are clues as to what kind of stories we love most and why. The highest rung on Maslow's ladder of human needs and desires, above self-actualization, was transcendence he said later in his life. Do we humans intuit that powers exist to transcend the merely mechanical and material, cause and effect solutions to problems in our seeming matter-based existence? We like dwelling in possibility. And stories which speak of possibility and the magical power of imagination, creativity, innovation, humor, wonder, beauty, and vision to overcome challenges encourage us that we can use these to improve our lives and the world.

#1 2011 best-selling book: STEVE JOBS. Jobs was the ultimate wizard of our age who used the magical power of design and technology to "distort reality" and create mind-bending products for us. Products that we couldn't imagine until he did for us. This book linked the magic of design and innovation to our every day reality.

#2 best-selling book: BOSSYPANTS by Tina Fey. Humor is a special kind of power which catapulted Fey's career. Think how humor has transcendent power--the right quip at the right time can win an election to the highest post of power in the world, which Reagan proved. Humor is sunshine to gray and grim days.

Other top ten best-sellers from last year include fantasy books such as A DANCE WITH DRAGONS by George Martin and INHERITANCE by Christopher Paolini. Fantasy is all about power, and the archetypal struggle of good with limited human resources over evil with an arsenal of malevolent power tools at its disposal. The success of Harry Potter attests to this allure.

Stories which involve transcendence speak to our hope that we're more than mortal beings limited by genetics, history, environment and the constraints of available resources to solve our problems. Stories of transcendence invigorate us and propel us to craft a life based on a sense of possibility and waiting potential. This marvelous book will awaken you to the power of story in your life.
10 people found this helpful