The Silent War: The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea
The Silent War: The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea book cover

The Silent War: The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea

Hardcover – March 15, 2001

Price
$19.99
Format
Hardcover
Pages
304
Publisher
Simon & Schuster
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0684872131
Dimensions
6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
Weight
1.2 pounds

Description

In October 1962, the United States government demanded that the Soviet Union remove long-range tactical missiles that it had positioned in Cuba, a short flight from targets like Washington and New York. After nearly a week's wait, during which the world braced for nuclear war, the Soviet government finally relented. It did so, in part, because its capitalist foe had one weapon that it then did not: 10 dozen submarine-mounted nuclear missiles that could be fired from beneath the waves and reach targets inside the Soviet Union within a matter of minutes. In The Silent War , John Craven, an architect of the Polaris missile program, writes that the episode offered unambiguous proof of the value of "a strong silent deterrent" and of the importance of a superb submarine force in preserving the balance of power. In this memoir, he recounts the evolution of the Polaris weapons system during the cold war. Along the way, he reveals little-known incidents of espionage and saber rattling that will give readers pause to wonder how war was avoided for all those years. A bonus for Tom Clancy fans (who are likely to enjoy his book in any event) is Craven's sketchy but fascinating tale of a real hunt for a lost Soviet submarine that took place during his tenure as well as his accessible but nonetheless detailed account of the advanced military technology he helped bring into being. --Gregory McNamee From Publishers Weekly In May 1968, submarine specialist John Craven, then chief scientist of the navy's special projects office, had just crossed into Virginia from Washington, D.C., on his way home from work when he heard an alarming news report on the radio. The USS Scorpion, a submarine, was missing in the ocean with 99 men on board. On hearing the news, Craven writes, "I immediately turned my car around and headed for the war room of the Pentagon." Amazingly, the loss of the Scorpion coincided with the disappearance of a Soviet submarine. How Craven spearheaded the search for the two ships a search that inspired The Hunt for Red October is the centerpiece of this fascinating series of set pieces that delve into the life-and-death mechanics of Cold War-era submarine service. Craven, who had previously been known as the head of the Polaris sub-based missile program, has surfaced mysteriously in the press over the years, most recently in the critically acclaimed Blind Man's Bluff: The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage; here, he is forthright about much of his background and activities. Anecdote-based chapters include descriptions of repairs to a newly launched USS Nautilus, rough briefings to the press and to the chain of command on Polaris, diving into the transoceanic cable-tapping Man-in-the-Sea program and much more. Craven quotes Byron, Verne and others with feeling throughout, and his explanations of the complicated physics related to his various projects are clear if sometimes still classified making this is a distinctively well-crafted intelligence-community memoir. (Apr. 4) Forecast: As Russo-American relations over espionage heat up, this book should find a general audience primed for a re-examination of the intricacies of the Cold War. While not quite Red October, it should reach beyond the buff market. Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc. From Library Journal A retired chief scientist of the navy's Special Projects Office and a minor character in Sherry Sontag's Blind Man's Bluff, Craven does not generate enough information or dramatic activity to create a Cold War espionage best seller along the lines of Blind Man's Bluff or Tom Clancy's The Hunt for Red October. The author was a pivotal player in the underwater research for the navy and is especially remembered for his work on deep-sea submersibles. Unfortunately, he does not reveal much that is not already known, except perhaps that the Soviet missile sub that sank around the time of the USN Scorpion was possibly a rogue and may have sunk while trying to launch a missile toward Hawaii. A good read about undersea research, this is ultimately not as not as riveting as other Cold War expos s. This is a hot topic, however, and little has been declassified to date. Recommended for military collections. Richard Nowicki, Emerson Vocational H.S., Buffalo Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Booklist Sherry Sontag's best-selling Blind Man's Bluff (1998) has created a ready market for Craven's memoir of his role in the U.S. Navy's submarine espionage against the Soviet Union. Craven designed the navy's minisubmarines in the 1950s and 1960s, and technology perforce guides many of his anecdotes. Other flavors in his war storytelling are bureaucratic politics and encounters with such forceful personalities as Edward Teller and Hyman Rickover. Craven's style is to jump from one adventure to the next, which in itself keeps the pages flapping. Insofar as the intelligence agencies allow, he reveals his involvement with such submarines as the Nautilus , the Polaris ballistic missile boats, the ill-fated Thresher and Scorpion , and the sunken Soviet sub that the CIA partially raised in the early 1970s. That last sub, Craven theorizes, was a rogue that sank from a catastrophic accident while launching a nuclear missile at Hawaii--a sensational claim that exemplifies the now-it-can-be-told aspect of Craven's reminiscences. A cinch to grab readers' and journalists' attention. Gilbert Taylor Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved John Piña Craven holds a Ph.D. from the University of Iowa and a J.D. from George Washington University. He was awarded two Distinguished Civil-ian Service Awards, the Navy's highest honor for civilians, among many other honors. After leaving the Navy, he was marine affairs coordinator for the state of Hawaii and dean of marine programs at the University of Hawaii. In 1976 he was appointed director of the Law of the Sea Institute. Currently the president of the Common Heritage Corporation, he lives in Honolulu, Hawaii. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Chapter One: In Peril Under the Sea On the Nautilus men's hearts never fail them. No defects to be afraid of, for the double shell is as firm as iron, no rigging to attend to, no sails for the wind to carry away; no boilers to burst, no fire to fear, for the vessel is made of iron, not of wood; no coal to run short, for electricity is the only power; no collision to fear, for it alone swims in deep water; no tempest to brave, for when it dives below the water, it reaches absolute tranquillity. That is the perfection of vessels. -- Jules Verne, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea (1869) In the bleak midwinter, the cold wind sweeps across Long Island Sound and funnels up the Connecticut valley of the Poquehanuck River, now called the Thames. Mariners know well the narrow channel that leads to the building yards of the Electric Boat Company and the Navy's submarine base in Groton, Connecticut, across the river from New London, where at pier after pier submarines make their preparations to go to sea. On one such day, in January of 1955, a great to-do of helicopters in the sky and ships in the channel gathered about the somber gray USS Nautilus. It was almost a year to the day since she had been launched, the traditional bottle of champagne broken on her bow. There was no ceremony or fanfare on this sullen winter day, but the media was out in force to cover the event -- the great submarine's moment of truth. Now, all lines cast off, she slipped away from her pier, making her way down the Thames toward Long Island Sound and then toward the open sea, as a lone quartermaster, manning the submarine's blinker, sent a message the world had never heard before: "Underway on nuclear power." Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, a unique figure, to put it mildly, in the long history of the United States Navy, had almost single-handedly led the successful struggle to introduce nuclear power to the fleet. USS Nautilus represented the first of his many victories over formidable opponents inside his own service, as well as throughout the nexus of the government and America's defense industries. Rickover had not limited his responsibility to the design and operation of the reactor but had extended his influence over the entire system, exercising complete control over every nut and bolt. But a nuclear submarine is more than its power plant. It must unite that plant with hull and structure, with stability and control, with an environmentally sustainable life-support system and habitat, a skilled and trained crew, and a host of components that give it a mission, meaning, and being. And like the wonderful one-horse shay, it must last for more than a year and a day. In the years after World War II the importance of radically redesigning a new high-speed, long-endurance instrument of submarine warfare had been recognized by some, but budgets were limited and time was short. So the Nautilus that put to sea, apart from the glowing core of its reactor deep within its hull, was nearly indistinguishable from the most modern diesel submarines. More than a year and a half later, in the first days of October 1956, there was neither press coverage nor ceremony on the Thames when the Nautilus slowly made her way to the Electric Boat Company dry dock. She had been tried at sea and had won every praise and laurel. Now, however, she was silently limping home. She was "down by the bow," as keen observers could see, but no one except her captain, Commander Eugene P. "Dennis" Wilkinson, had the slightest indication that the mighty Nautilus might be in grave danger. Wilkinson's concern was communicated to retired Admiral Andrew McKee, chief designer for Electric Boat. By the very quaintness of its name, the Electric Boat Company proclaimed that it had been around a long time; it had in fact been building battery-powered submarines as long as submarines had been built for the United States Navy, and McKee was long in experience, too. His own name had become synonymous with World War II submarine design. In the early days of the war, the S-boats were doomed to sink if the engine room flooded. McKee added a sixteen-foot section to each hull that was no more than a buoyancy module, but it saved a fleet. As Electric Boat entered the nuclear age McKee's accomplishments kept pace. Like Wilkinson, he already knew that the Nautilus had been experiencing severe vibrations at high speed. The skipper had complained forcefully to the Navy's Bureau of Ships, whose structural engineers had measured these vibrations but had been unable to find their source. The problem had been assigned to the flow studies section of the David Taylor Model Basin and handed over to me. At thirty-two years old, I was the new kid on the block -- a physicist at the Washington, D.C., David Taylor Model Basin -- considered by virtue of my California Institute of Technology master's degree and University of Iowa Ph.D. a theoretical whiz in hydrodynamics and structures, though few knew of my practical experience with ships at sea. How could they? It had been more than a dozen years since I had twice disgraced my father by failing to get into Annapolis and then by joining the Navy as a mere enlisted man -- breaking the long line of revered Craven family naval officers who had gone on from the Academy to distinguished Navy careers. A third and perhaps intolerable disgrace would have been my lockup on a court-martial offense in the brig, following an unjustifiable fistfight with a fellow enlistee while on duty. Instead, the apparent emergency of the gory injury to my fighting hand landed me in a hospital, where a magnanimous Navy doctor decided, after putting two and two together, that the break in my protruding bone had occurred when I ran into a door, or, rather -- to remove all fault on my part -- a door ran into me. When the hospital staff finally noticed that Seaman Craven, who was basking in a monthlong convalescence, was again fit for duty, I was summarily transported to still devastated Pearl Harbor. Assigned to the battleship New Mexico, I found her moored alongside the sunken but balefully visible battleship Arizona, which had been lost in the surprise attack. It was the first day of 1944 and we were headed for the Marshall Islands to fight the rest of the war, but luck had somehow attached itself to my side, where it stuck. My brief (six months) but intense encounters in battle were experienced as a helmsman of the New Mexico, flagship of a task force of some 100 ships of the line and the train. Here I would meet naval officers who were destined to one day be my subordinates. Here I would participate in and hear firsthand of battles won or lost by technology or skill, or both. Here, as the lowest-ranking seaman, I would acquire the helmsman's feel of the sea in calm, wind, and storm, in head sea, quartering sea, beam sea, and following sea. By war's end I was enrolled at Cornell University in a naval science training program, graduating two years later near the top of my class with a commission as an ensign in the Naval Reserve. It was too late to fulfill my family destiny but a career as a naval scientist might make for a happy compromise. Accepted for graduate studies at Cal Tech, one of the nation's elite science and technology institutions, I went on for the next few years as a GI Bill student with scarcely enough time to leave the laboratory or look up from my books. Thus had I been rendered the "whiz kid" who now stood on the pier with my seasoned elders, Commander Wilkinson and Admiral McKee, and the world-famous Nautilus in dry dock. We inspected the submarine from stem to stern. Our first concern was the integrity of the pressure hull. This is the inner space capsule that resists the pressure of the deep ocean. A Read more

Features & Highlights

  • The Cold War was the first major conflict between superpowers in which victory and defeat were unambiguously determined without the firing of a shot. Without the shield of a strong, silent deterrent or the intellectual sword of espionage beneath the sea, that war could not have been won. John P. Craven was a key figure in the Cold War beneath the sea. As chief scientist of the Navy's Special Projects Office, which supervised the Polaris missile system, then later as head of the Deep Submergence Systems Project (DSSP) and the Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle program (DSRV), both of which engaged in a variety of clandestine undersea projects, he was intimately involved with planning and executing America's submarine-based nuclear deterrence and submarine-based espionage activities during the height of the Cold War. Craven was considered so important by the Soviets that they assigned a full-time KGB agent to spy on him. Some of Craven's highly classified activities have been mentioned in such books as Blind Man's Bluff, but now he gives us his own insights into the deadly cat-and-mouse game that U.S. and Soviet forces played deep in the world's oceans. Craven tells riveting stories about the most treacherous years of the Cold War. In 1956 Nautilus, the world's first nuclear-powered submarine and the backbone of the Polaris ballistic missile system, was only days or even hours from sinking due to structural damage of unknown origin. Craven led a team of experts to diagnose the structural flaw that could have sent the sub to the bottom of the ocean, taking the Navy's missile program with it. Craven offers insight into the rivalry between the advocates of deterrence (with whom he sided) and those military men and scientists, such as Edward Teller, who believed that the United States had to prepare to fight and win a nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union. He describes the argument that raged in the Navy over the reasons for the tragic loss of the submarine Thresher, and tells the astonishing story of the hunt for the rogue Soviet sub that became the model for The Hunt for Red October -- including the amazing discovery the Navy made when it eventually found the sunken sub. Craven takes readers inside the highly secret DSSP and DSRV programs, both of which offered crucial cover for sophisticated intelligence operations. Both programs performed important salvage operations in addition to their secret espionage activities, notably the recovery of a nuclear bomb off Palomares, Spain. He describes how the Navy's success at deep-sea recovery operations led to the takeover of the entire program by the CIA during the Nixon administration. A compelling tale of intrigue, both within our own government and between the U.S. and Soviet navies, The Silent War is an enthralling insider's account of how the submarine service kept the peace during the dangerous days of the Cold War.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(116)
★★★★
25%
(97)
★★★
15%
(58)
★★
7%
(27)
23%
(89)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The Silent War

Just finished John Craven's book, "The Silent War".
As a newly retired 24 year Submarine Veteran, I'm just as excited as the next guy when confronted with anything that speaks to submarining. Plus I knew who Craven was, knew what he'd meant to the Navy and knew he was current, so it was with great anticipation that I picked up his book.
It was interesting enough, but still in the end I felt a little unfulfilled. My submarine career pretty much encompasses the second half and end of The Cold War, and I guess I expected to see a little more of me and my comrades in Craven's work which is subtitled, "The Cold War Battle Beneath The Sea", accompanied by a dashing photo of a 688 class nuclear submarine on it's dustcover.
Craven writes in great, sometimes scientific detail, about the various Navy and marine programs and investigations he was involved in. But there is not a lot discussion of actual operational submarining, in contrast to Sherry Sontag's and Christopher Drew's "Blind Man's Bluff", and this may be where the reader gets mislead. There may be security reasons, or maybe operational submarine discussion of the period isn't interesting to anybody but us submariners who were there, but a reader looking for that will be disappointed.
But there IS room for "Blind Man's Bluff" and "The Silent War" in your submarine library. While Sontag and Drew have taken a lot of flack for their book, it IS much more a story of the submarines, the crews, and the missions than anything else current. Craven writes from a much more "above it all" perspective and his topics and discussions deal more with their strategic impact on submarining, than with the actual submarining itself.
The one REAL negative of Craven's work is his propensity for tooting his own horn and patting himself on the back.
It starts at the very beginning and continues unabated throughout the book. The personality and demeanor that we see of him in all the television pieces on submarines, shines through on every page of the book. He did make an invaluable contribution to submarines, the Navy, and our nation, but he's gotta give us a break.
Maybe if he'd titled his book, "My Story", with a portrait of himself wearing a tiny little set of civilian dolphins, we would have been better prepared for what we were getting into.
Gene Brockington, San Diego, California
53 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An Excellent Companion to "Bluff," Is this the Murky Truth?

Few people knew of John Pina Craven before the publication of "Blind Man's Bluff" in 1998, shedding light upon the life and work of the man who has left a mark nearly equal of Hyman G. Rickover's upon the silent service. "Bluff" wasn't perfect, however, relying upon partially declassified documents and (sometime anonymous) personal accounts of submarine espionage operations during the Cold War.
Now, Craven has written his own account of his service with the U.S. Navy. Though he avoids discussing some of the accounts found within "Bluff," due to classification concerns, he does provide a number of details previously unpublished, as well as his unique insight into Cold War submarine operations.
Some of his accounts are somewhat questionable, given contradictions with previously published accounts, which again, brings up his concerns over revealing sensitive information.
The only thing lacking from the book is illustrations or pictures of any kind, which seems odd given the wealth of published images on the subject. Furthermore, a peek into Craven's personal photo collection would be fascinating.
Overall, a highly-recommended book for those interested in submarine and Cold War history.
30 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An interesting description of years on military projects

It is unusual for an author in his 70's to write memoirs of very secret and critical projects. The main events go back to the 50's and 60's and most of Craven's peers and colleagues are long retired or dead. Craven appears to be a substantive scientist, and the book is written certainly from his point of view. Just his reinterpretation of the events around the Glomar Explorer make this an interesting read. Since everything was top secret or higher, we will never really know the truth, and I would doubt that any historian or biographer will ever be able to dig out many of the events in these most secret programs he discusses. However, any older engineer that knew a bit about these things at that time will find the book worthwhile.
When I made a quick first pass through the book, I was not so impresssed, but then doing a second, more serious read I liked what I saw. What some would consider self-centered, others would view as the confidence needed in a scientist and administrator to get things done. Due to the secrecy of the programs, there is a lot held back, and I thought this took some carefulness in the writing that would make some topics appear disjointed. I presume Craven had a diary and notes and a good memory to be able to play back some of these events, and again I would be puzzled by how many notes can you keep when everything is top secret.
I found this a good read, but I have a historical interest in technology events of that period. If you have similar interests, you will not be disappointed.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A real sleeper!

I have to admit, I didn't buy this book. My girlfriend got it for me. I normally don't read about subs as I am interested in Nuclear Weapons and Hazardous Device Disposal. What a pleasant surprise to find that the book is written by one who was involved with one of the biggest EOD Nuclear evolutions in the published literature - the Palomares incident.
This book is the true definition of a sleeper. The first couple of chapters did little to entice me. In fact his "I-me-I-did-this" attitude and lack of refined writing skills put me off a little bit. By the end of the book, I was completely hooked, and hoping he writes another book before he passes away.
You see, his involvement with submersible operations put him squarely in (under? lol) the center of many notable Cold War events. His take on things, bolstered by the fact he was an actual participant in many, put several operations in a totally different light for me.
One such event was the true story behind Clancy's 'Hunt' book. Up until I read Craven's book, I thought the retellings of the operation were, too, well, Hollywood. Craven's explanation makes perfect, although chilling, sense, and has the ring of clarity and truth.
Another topic was the Hughes / CIA Glomar Explorer.Many things about that operation made NO sense to me, until I read this book. While Craven is reticent to divulge many details, his explanations are like a knowledgeable individual peering over your shoulder as you watch and read other treatises on events.
I recommend this book, with the caveat not to concentrate on the author as much as the events. In this light, this is an excellent and worthy next acquisition.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Inside story

"The Silent War" adds more grist to the ever-churning mill of rumors about the Soviet submarine that sank about 1,500 miles from Maui in 1968.

John Craven, a civilian who was chief scientist for the Navy's Special Projects Office, proposes that the sub may have been a rogue and that it was preparing to launch a one-megaton missile at Oahu.

Craven infers this, in part, because photos of the wreckage seem to show that the conventional explosive that surrounds the nuclear warhead exploded, leading to the loss of the sub. Such an explosion is one kind of "fail-safe" device: If some unauthorized tampering is done, better to blow up the missile than have it armed and dispatched.

Craven says the probability that the sub was a rogue is low but he seems to take it seriously. His scenario does not explain how the rogue crew hoped to reach Oahu with a missile whose range is thought to have been 750 miles.

Craven, still bound by security regulations, says he isn't revealing any secrets. A comparison of "The Silent War" to "Blind Man's Bluff," the 1999 book about underwater spying, and to "Spy Sub," a 1997 novelized version of the hunt for the Soviet sub by one of the participants, leaves plenty of mystery.

"60 Minutes" reported the sub's number was K129, but Craven says survivors of the crew said it was something else. In "Spy Sub," Roger Dunham calls it PL-751.

Whatever it was, Hawaii was involved at least after the sinking, if not before.

The spy sub USS Halibut ("Viperfish" in Dunham's book), which Craven's group supplied the still-secret hardware for, practiced its hunting off Lahaina, Maui, in the early '70s. The Glomar Explorer, the CIA ship that tried to lift the sub off the seafloor, was much noticed in Hawaii around 1974.

Craven, as interested in policy as in ocean technology, provides a novel reinterpretation of that episode.

According to him, the Navy could have explored the sunken sub with supersecret underwater craft, and nobody would ever have known. Instead, the Nixon administration pulled the Navy off, gave undersea intelligence to the CIA (which meant that Craven had nothing to do with Glomar) and -- besides blowing $500 million on a (probably) failed mission -- nearly ruined the advance of oceanic technology.

The argument, which like most of Craven's views is neither simple nor obvious, is that the cover story for the Glomar -- that it was going to recover manganese nodules off the deep ocean floor -- was stupid.

It certainly was. By 1974, it was known that you could not make money bringing up lobsters worth $5 a pound from 1,000 feet deep, so it was absurd to think it would be worthwhile to bring up nodules worth a penny a pound from 15,000 feet.

Nevertheless, according to Craven's view, the ocean scientists of the rich countries were left "misunderstanding the limits of ocean resources," which led to "the waste of precious development resources."

Maybe so, but if the people in charge were stupid enough to fall for the CIA trick, that raises the question whether they would have done any better if they had deployed their manganese-hunting millions in some other direction.

Possibly not. After leaving the Navy, Craven became a dean at the University of Hawaii, where he became project manager for two of the most hare-brained schemes ever hatched by a state government famous for fiascos, a "floating city" off Waikiki and the embarrassing ocean thermal energy conversion project at Keahole.

Craven, whose family tradition had him down from birth for the Naval Academy, couldn't get appointed. After obtaining a doctorate at the University of Iowa, he ended up in the middle of Navy business anyway, an opportunity for which he is grateful.

The earlier part of "The Silent War" concerns the development of the Polaris nuclear war deterrent. "A nation choosing a strategy of nuclear deterrence cannot also choose a strategy that would commit the nation to a tactical nuclear war," he writes, which not everybody understood, then or now.

Via another complex argument, Craven asserts that the undersea cold war allowed the United States to let the U.S.S.R. know it knew in the 1980s that the Kremlin was losing command and control of its deterrent forces, and such an understanding brought about the dismantling of the Soviet Union.

In a short review, it is not possible to give the full weight of Craven's argument on this subject. You will have to read it yourself, which is worth doing anyhow, as "The Silent War" is also a fine mix of derring-do, good old American know-how and personal strife and achievement.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A true American Hero

John Pina Craven's The Silent War is written by a genius, a patriot and an important figure of our Cold War victory. Those who have criticized the book on the basis of its chronicling of the author's recollection of his own role in the events depicted must suffer from their own inferiority complexes; Craven was there, and he played the role he played. That's history, folks. Blind Man's Bluff, which predated his book and which he did NOT write, confirms this. Finally, as one who has had the privilege and pleasure of sitting down with him and hearing some of the exploits of those he writes about, I can report that he is a true patriot and a man of peace, who did what he did to prevent war at all costs - billions but worth every penny.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Silent War ... The Story of J.P. Craven

I was looking forward to reading this book. Made it almost through Chapter 2 and decided I was done. This book is more about J.P. Craven than it is about the Cold War and the courageous and commendable service that was provided by the Navy's Silent Service. If you want to know about how Craven saved the world, this is the book for you otherwise it is a great disappointment. Recommend reading (or re-reading) Blind Man's Bluff before opening this autobiography.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Was the Cold War Silent?

This is not a work of documented history; the events described were drawn from undocumented personal recollection. It was written as a rebuff to BLIND MAN'S BLUFF written two years earlier which had exposed his activities working with the Polaris missile project.
Thus, he endeavors to present the facts by one who was involved from the very beginning on a four-decade program of undersea intelligence which must remain secret.
Our government is releasing highly classified information via the Internet, not just in Washington, but in Huntsville, AL where the Redstone Arsenal (full of missiles) is located. I discovered this a few years ago from the secretary of one of the high offices. Her job was to enter this information so that anyone anywhere in the world could have access to this important research which should have remained secret.
This book does not expound upon some of the projects, but now it is available to the public and to foreigners. Just because the Soviet Union has fallen apart, that does not mean there are not other foes who can use this intelligence against us.
John Craven lives in Hawaii and has met with a group of the former submariners for a breakfast gathering the past twenty three years to recall things which are better left unsaid. To wish it had not received the notoriety will be too late to protect this nation's safety.
The index helps to find the references he makes to the action taking place under the oceans. It would have been better if he had used the history of this program as a basis of a fictional account. That way, no one would know what is true and what not.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A memoir, not a history

This book is a personal memoir of some parts of the undersea portion of the Cold War. It is not a history. As a memoir, it is useful in making the reader aware of the existence of certain undersea programs, and the portrayals of some key players in these programs are interesting. It is a useful companion to "Blind Man's Bluff", and is significantly broader in scope than that book. For example, it details the recovery of the lost hydrogen bomb off Spain in 1967, and includes a chilling account of a deep sea diving program almost wrecked by a murderous saboteur. However, it is lacking in depth and detail. The obstacles overcome by the Polaris program are enumerated, but the story of how they were overcome is omitted. The author discusses the issue of deterrence versus preparation for nuclear war, but fails to mention many key facts in this Cold War debate, especially the fact that numerous tactical nuclear weapons were developed and deployed. There is also a significant contradiction in what he says about Polaris. He emphasizes the need for a full one megaton warhead on the Polaris A-1 missile, to give potential enemies a number they could grasp. He then goes on to list a record yield-to-weight ratio as a major achievement of Polaris. Elsewhere, he claims that Edward Teller's invention of the hydrogen bomb was "unnecessary". However, without hydrogen bomb technology, a one megaton warhead could not be made small enough to be launched from a submarine. Overall, the book is more of an outline than a history.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Anti-Cold War Hardliners

Although Craven played a large role in one of the most effective weapons systems of the Cold War, he positions himself as a relative "dove," claiming that the Polaris was a "deterrent" sysytem as compared to systems backed by Edward Teller et al, which Craven considers to be offensive first-strike weapons. Craven apperars to be enamored of the MAD doctrine and thus opposes missle defense. For me the low point of the book is p. 87 where he blasts Teller for convincing Reagan to hang tough at the 1986 Reykjavik Summit with Gorbachev.
3 people found this helpful