The Second Mountain: The Quest for a Moral Life
The Second Mountain: The Quest for a Moral Life book cover

The Second Mountain: The Quest for a Moral Life

Hardcover – April 16, 2019

Price
$15.70
Format
Hardcover
Pages
384
Publisher
Random House
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0812993264
Dimensions
6.35 x 1.27 x 9.63 inches
Weight
1.4 pounds

Description

Review Praise for David Brooks “David Brooks’s gift—as he might put it in his swift, engaging way—is for making obscure but potent social studies research accessible and even startling.” — The New York Times Book Review “At his best, Brooks is a normative version of Malcolm Gladwell, culling from a wide array of scientists and thinkers to weave an idea bigger than the sum of its parts.” — USA Today “Brooks’s considerable achievement comes in his ability to elevate the unseen aspects of private experience into a vigorous and challenging conversation about what we all share.” — San Francisco Chronicle About the Author David Brooks is one of the nation’s leading writers and commentators. He is an op-ed columnist for The New York Times and appears regularly on PBS NewsHour and Meet the Press . He is the bestselling author of The Road to Character; The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement; Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There; and On Paradise Drive: How We Live Now (and Always Have) in the Future Tense. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Every once in a while, I meet a person who radiates joy. These are people who seem to glow with an inner light. They are kind, tranquil, delighted by small pleasures, and grateful for the large ones. These people are not perfect. They get exhausted and stressed. They make errors in judgment. But they live for others, and not for themselves. They’ve made unshakable commitments to family, a cause, a community, or a faith. They know why they were put on this earth and derive a deep satisfaction from doing what they have been called to do. Life isn’t easy for these people. They’ve taken on the burdens of others. But they have a serenity about them, a settled resolve. They are interested in you, make you feel cherished and known, and take delight in your good. When you meet these people, you realize that joy is not just a feeling, it can be an outlook. There are temporary highs we all get after we win some victory, and then there is also this other kind of permanent joy that animates people who are not obsessed with themselves but have given themselves away. I often find that their life has what I think of as a two-mountain shape. They got out of school, began their career or started a family, and identified the mountain they thought they were meant to climb: I’m going to be a cop, a doctor, an entrepreneur, what have you. On the first mountain, we all have to perform certain life tasks: establish an identity, separate from our parents, cultivate our talents, build a secure ego, and try to make a mark in the world. People climbing that first mountain spend a lot of time thinking about reputation management. They are always keeping score. How do I measure up? Where do I rank? As the psychologist James Hollis puts it, at that stage we have a tendency to think, I am what the world says I am. The goals on that first mountain are the normal goals that our culture endorses—to be a success, to be well thought of, to get invited into the right social circles, and to experience personal happiness. It’s all the normal stuff: nice home, nice family, nice vacations, good food, good friends, and so on. Then something happens. Some people get to the top of that first mountain, taste success, and find it . . . unsatisfying. “Is this all there is?” they wonder. They sense there must be a deeper journey they can take. Other people get knocked off that mountain by some failure. Something happens to their career, their family, or their reputation. Suddenly life doesn’t look like a steady ascent up the mountain of success; it has a different and more disappointing shape. For still others, something unexpected happens that knocks them crossways: the death of a child, a cancer scare, a struggle with addiction, some life-altering tragedy that was not part of the original plan. Whatever the cause, these people are no longer on the mountain. They are down in the valley of bewilderment or suffering. This can happen at any age, by the way, from eight to eighty-five and beyond. It’s never too early or too late to get knocked off your first mountain. These seasons of suffering have a way of exposing the deepest parts of ourselves and reminding us that we’re not the people we thought we were. People in the valley have been broken open. They have been reminded that they are not just the parts of themselves that they put on display. There is another layer to them they have been neglecting, a substrate where the dark wounds, and most powerful yearnings live. Some shrivel in the face of this kind of suffering. They seem to get more afraid and more resentful. They shrink away from their inner depths in fear. Their lives become smaller and lonelier. We all know old people who nurse eternal grievances. They don’t get the respect they deserve. They live their lives as an endless tantrum about some wrong done to them long ago. But for others, this valley is the making of them. The season of suffering interrupts the superficial flow of everyday life. They see deeper into themselves and realize that down in the substrate, flowing from all the tender places, there is a fundamental ability to care, a yearning to transcend the self and care for others. And when they have encountered this yearning, they are ready to become a whole person. They see familiar things with new eyes. They are finally able to love their neighbor as themselves, not as a slogan but a practical reality. Their life is defined by how they react to their moment of greatest adversity. The people who are made larger by suffering go on to stage two small rebellions. First, they rebel against their ego ideal. When they were on their first mountain, their ego had some vision of what it was shooting for—some vision of prominence, pleasure, and success. Down in the valley they lose interest in their ego ideal. Of course afterward they still feel and sometimes succumb to their selfish desires. But, overall, they realize the desires of the ego are never going to satisfy the deep regions they have discovered in themselves. They realize, as Henri Nouwen put it, that they are much better than their ego ideal. Second, they rebel against the mainstream culture. All their lives they’ve been taking economics classes or living in a culture that teaches that human beings pursue self-interest—money, power, fame. But suddenly they are not interested in what other people tell them to want. They want to want the things that are truly worth wanting. They elevate their desires. The world tells them to be a good consumer, but they want to be the one consumed—by a moral cause. The world tells them to want independence, but they want interdependence—to be enmeshed in a web of warm relationships. The world tells them to want individual freedom, but they want intimacy, responsibility, and commitment. The world wants them to climb the ladder and pursue success, but they want to be a person for others. The magazines on the magazine rack want them to ask “What can I do to make myself happy?” but they glimpse something bigger than personal happiness. The people who have been made larger by suffering are brave enough to let parts of their old self die. Down in the valley, their motivations changed. They’ve gone from self-centered to other-centered. At this point, people realize, Oh, that first mountain wasn’t my mountain after all. There’s another, bigger mountain out there that is actually my mountain. The second mountain is not the opposite of the first mountain. To climb it doesn’t mean rejecting the first mountain. It’s the journey after it. It’s the more generous and satisfying phase of life. Some people radically alter their lives when this happens. They give up their law practices and move to Tibet. They quit their jobs as consultants and become teachers in inner-city schools. Others stay in their basic fields but spend their time differently. I have a friend who built a successful business in the Central Valley of California. She still has her business but spends most of her time building preschools and health centers for the people who work in her company. She is on her second mountain. Still others stay in their same jobs and their same marriages, but are transformed. It’s not about self anymore; it’s about a summons. If they are principals, their joy is in seeing their teachers shine. If they work in a company, they no longer see themselves as managers but as mentors; their energies are devoted to helping others get better. They want their organizations to be thick places, where people find purpose, and not thin places, where people come just to draw a salary. In their book Practical Wisdom , psychologist Barry Schwartz and political scientist Kenneth Sharpe tell a story about a hospital janitor named Luke. In the hospital where Luke worked, there was a young man who’d gotten into a fight and was now in a coma, and he wasn’t coming out. Every day, his father sat by his side in silent vigil, and had done so for six months. One day, Luke came in and cleaned the young man’s room. His father wasn’t there; he was out getting a smoke. Later that day, Luke ran into the father in the hallway. The father snapped at Luke and accused him of not cleaning his son’s room. The first-mountain response is to see your job as cleaning rooms. “I did clean your son’s room,” you would snap back. “It was just that you were out smoking.” The second-mountain response is to see your job as serving patients and their families. It is to meet their needs at a time of crisis. That response says, This man needs comfort. Clean the room again. And that’s what Luke did. As he told an interviewer later, “I cleaned it so that he could see me cleaning it. . . . I can understand how he could be. It was like six months that his son was there. He’d been a little frustrated, and I cleaned it again. But I wasn’t angry with him. I guess I could understand.” Read more

Features & Highlights

  • #1
  • NEW YORK TIMES
  • BESTSELLER • Everybody tells you to live for a cause larger than yourself, but how exactly do you do it? The author of
  • The Road to Character
  • explores what it takes to lead a meaningful life in a self-centered world.
  • “Deeply moving, frequently eloquent and extraordinarily incisive.”—
  • The Washington Post
  • Every so often, you meet people who radiate joy—who seem to know why they were put on this earth, who glow with a kind of inner light. Life, for these people, has often followed what we might think of as a two-mountain shape. They get out of school, they start a career, and they begin climbing the mountain they thought they were meant to climb. Their goals on this first mountain are the ones our culture endorses: to be a success, to make your mark, to experience personal happiness. But when they get to the top of that mountain, something happens. They look around and find the view . . . unsatisfying. They realize: This wasn’t my mountain after all. There’s another, bigger mountain out there that is actually
  • my
  • mountain. And so they embark on a new journey. On the second mountain, life moves from self-centered to other-centered. They want the things that are truly worth wanting, not the things other people tell them to want. They embrace a life of interdependence, not independence. They surrender to a life of commitment. In
  • The Second Mountain,
  • David Brooks explores the four commitments that define a life of meaning and purpose: to a spouse and family, to a vocation, to a philosophy or faith, and to a community. Our personal fulfillment depends on how well we choose and execute these commitments. Brooks looks at a range of people who have lived joyous, committed lives, and who have embraced the necessity and beauty of dependence. He gathers their wisdom on how to choose a partner, how to pick a vocation, how to live out a philosophy, and how we can begin to integrate our commitments into one overriding purpose. In short, this book is meant to help us all lead more meaningful lives. But it’s also a provocative social commentary. We live in a society, Brooks argues, that celebrates freedom, that tells us to be true to ourselves, at the expense of surrendering to a cause, rooting ourselves in a neighborhood, binding ourselves to others by social solidarity and love. We have taken individualism to the extreme—and in the process we have torn the social fabric in a thousand different ways. The path to repair is through making deeper commitments. In
  • The Second Mountain,
  • Brooks shows what can happen when we put commitment-making at the center of our lives.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(1K)
★★★★
25%
(865)
★★★
15%
(519)
★★
7%
(242)
23%
(795)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

A Reappraisal of Human Nature

In the last five years David Brooks has been on a journey. The dissolution of his first marriage, the decline of neo-conservatism in Republican circles and his own involvement in sponsoring people involved in community and personal restoration has led him to revise his view of the world.

Brooks now sees the struggle for personal advancement—for more money, status and power—as merely a lesser mountain for people to climb. The pursuit of happiness, the American dream...these individualistic strivings have been too emphasized in the contemporary West. There is a second mountain that touches the deeper aspects of our humanity. One climbs it by self-sacrifice and commitment to spouse and community. Above all, one realizes that true joy in life comes from believing and serving something greater than yourself.

Brooks further believes this journey has importance for all of America. It is the baby-boomers hyper-focus on individual achievement that is at the root of our current political malaise. Only by a societal return to an other-centered life can we overcome our tribalism and divisions.

If this journey sounds rather familiar it is because it is the same voyage many people have made throughout history. Thus, Brooks spends most of the book focused on the biographies and thoughts of great men and women with similar experiences. His own personal journey is fittingly secondary.

But this is where the book has a fundamental weakness. While Brooks and those he cites can provide vivid testimonials of their experience there is no effort to ground any of this in a scientific account of human nature, a history of the world or our particular species, etc.

After reading the book one might be left with the impression one has when someone describes how they found God and how that pulled them out of depression, anxiety, lethargy or some other predicament. No one would want to tell somebody to abandon a belief that had such beneficial effects, but a personal experience is just that—personal. Whether it translates from one person to another is highly doubtful.

So while I admire Brooks’ bravery in writing such a counter-cultural work, I have to conclude that the book’s overall argument relies on nothing but testimonials. For someone who gives annual awards to social scientists this seems like a great lacunae. Why should I trust these testimonials if my experience of the world is very different?

In short, if people read this book and become convinced to be other-centered and discover great joy in their life, I would be the last person to dissuade them. But from David Brooks I wanted more. I wanted some account of human nature that would ground this other-directedness in something rational. A powerful testimonial but, in the end, only a testimonial. In my opinion, that makes The Second Mountain an enjoyable but not an essential book.
454 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Another thread of "The Privatization of Hope"

There's a good deal to like about Brooks' newest run at "character." Unfortunately, my quibble isn't with what Brooks says; it's with what he doesn't say. Once again, FTM: Follow The Money.

There's a huge, concerted, well-funded effort in this country to promote the very elements that Brooks belatedly laments. The corporate, right-wing, "conservative" view is to bash anything and everything about government programs, social organizations, community organizations, unions, religious efforts at social justice (well, except the fundamentalist "prosperity Gospel" idea that society does best when you get rich, of course), and every other collective effort to support the broader society. Unfortunately, Brooks (willfully, I believe) ignores this pernicious activity. That message is, "Have a problem? Don't look to government. Have issues in your life? It's your problem; don't look any farther than your own nose because it's your fault. Concerned about society as a whole? There's no solution outside of the individual--don't look to an organization to help you do anything about it."

People lamenting the cult of individualism need to look to the sources of--and the huge amounts of money and power behind--the messaging of individualism, and the denigration of social and community institutions that have been the bedrock of American democracy.

For a great article on this intentional social destruction, go to bostonreview dot net and search on The Privatization of Hope by Ronald Aronson. He writes...

"What a spectacle is offered by the privatization of hope: the displacement from the social to the individual, the growth of the personal at the expense of the social, and the remaking of the social into the biographical. These are driven, among other things, by relations of power and domination and by the overwhelming force exerted on every aspect of our beings by the economy and its priorities. Under these conditions, basic social impulses such as the need to contribute to a wider community become other than themselves without completely losing their original character, which abides in a repressed form. We can imagine a rebalancing of the social and the personal as a kind of “return of the repressed” but only through a transformation of the economic order that has been driving it.

"That order has imposed a deliberate ideological and political project aiming to erode social connectedness and conviction. The first politician who sought to implement this revived Hobbesianism was British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher: “There is no such thing as society, only individuals and families,” she famously declared, which turned out to prophesy this transformation. Economics was a method whose “object is to change the soul.” A generation later in the United Kingdom, the United States, and elsewhere, that object appears to have been realized.

"We have witnessed an immensely effective, well organized, and lavishly funded effort to reshape values, ideas, and attitudes. Writers working for right-wing think tanks such as the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation have implored us to turn away from treating the public realm as a terrain for improvement and change. They have been teaching cynicism about collective action and encouraging instead individual responsibility, personal initiative, and the centrality of private activities."

I wish Brooks would accept responsibility for his "conservative" brethrens' contributions to--and support of--this mess instead of blaming the victims once again.
333 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Vital topic but atrocious advice

I'll start with the good. Mr Brooks raises an extremely important topic that is rarely discussed- morality. Anything that brings this topic to the forefront is a plus. He also relates some very personal anecdotes and is open about his own path, which requires a certain level of courage.

Now for the bad- his message is a complete con and it is the exact wrong message that is needed. It is a con because he acts like all other philosophies are based on selfishness and his is the only pure one. He, like essentially everyone else, defines "self-interest" as material gain and fame, implicitly at any cost. This is complete garbage- it is not in your self interest to ignore all principles in order to gain material wealth or to make fame a priority- which is based on other peoples' opinions, so by definition is not self-focused but focused on what others think. Properly defining 'self-interest' is an extremely complex and difficult task. The self is not a bunch of emotions and urges. Bernie Madoff was not acting in his own self interest.

The book mentions over and over how the biggest moral goal is to give yourself away and the most noble thing is self-sacrifice for others. This is a common theme in our culture so it's taken for granted that this is what constitutes morality, and even questioning it makes most people uneasy. But just applying a little honest reflection shows this does not make any sense. If it is so great to sacrifice for others, why is considered good for them to accept it? Why is other peoples' happiness important, but not your own? And if sacrificing yourself is what makes you happy, does that mean you're actually being "self-interested" and isn't that the bad thing to start off with? Achieving happiness for yourself is a difficult enough task- first do that and then decide if you want give it all away for others.

Another fundamental problem with this common theme is that it requires and praises the non-use of reason. Man's mind is responsible for every great achievement, without exception. Man's mind is reason. That is what separates us from the animals and what differentiates places like New York City from a beaver dam. If you accept that these 'sublime feelings' that he discusses justify his morality, then you've accepted emotion as the standard. And anyone else can justify anything, no matter how depraved, if they 'feel' it's okay. And once you try to refute it, you have started using reason again, which undermines the 'sublime feeling' justification.

Recommend based on discussion of morality, but particular philosophy discussed is self destructive. It's unfortunate morality is so little discussed and the overwhelming majority of people don't know any alternate moralities exist.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Vital topic but atrocious advice

I'll start with the good. Mr Brooks raises an extremely important topic that is rarely discussed- morality. Anything that brings this topic to the forefront is a plus. He also relates some very personal anecdotes and is open about his own path, which requires a certain level of courage.

Now for the bad- his message is a complete con and it is the exact wrong message that is needed. It is a con because he acts like all other philosophies are based on selfishness and his is the only pure one. He, like essentially everyone else, defines "self-interest" as material gain and fame, implicitly at any cost. This is complete garbage- it is not in your self interest to ignore all principles in order to gain material wealth or to make fame a priority- which is based on other peoples' opinions, so by definition is not self-focused but focused on what others think. Properly defining 'self-interest' is an extremely complex and difficult task. The self is not a bunch of emotions and urges. Bernie Madoff was not acting in his own self interest.

The book mentions over and over how the biggest moral goal is to give yourself away and the most noble thing is self-sacrifice for others. This is a common theme in our culture so it's taken for granted that this is what constitutes morality, and even questioning it makes most people uneasy. But just applying a little honest reflection shows this does not make any sense. If it is so great to sacrifice for others, why is considered good for them to accept it? Why is other peoples' happiness important, but not your own? And if sacrificing yourself is what makes you happy, does that mean you're actually being "self-interested" and isn't that the bad thing to start off with? Achieving happiness for yourself is a difficult enough task- first do that and then decide if you want give it all away for others.

Another fundamental problem with this common theme is that it requires and praises the non-use of reason. Man's mind is responsible for every great achievement, without exception. Man's mind is reason. That is what separates us from the animals and what differentiates places like New York City from a beaver dam. If you accept that these 'sublime feelings' that he discusses justify his morality, then you've accepted emotion as the standard. And anyone else can justify anything, no matter how depraved, if they 'feel' it's okay. And once you try to refute it, you have started using reason again, which undermines the 'sublime feeling' justification.

Recommend based on discussion of morality, but particular philosophy discussed is self destructive. It's unfortunate morality is so little discussed and the overwhelming majority of people don't know any alternate moralities exist.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A just position of an ethic question.

Brooks is a columnist of nyt. He therefore should be considered of great objectivity, when he talks about ethics. The questions which he poses are in fact true: without an ethics a country can't have a decisive role in the world. It looks like that usa have losen something about its militar and economical role. But the cultural importance remains strong : the literature, the philosophy , the scientific research are very important.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A waste of time

I learned nothing of value from this book. It is too long and there is no point to it. It is mostly an autobiography of the author. It is how an American Jew views the world and contains widely known basic information such as relationships are important, religion is important, and community is important. It heavily borrows ideas from other people and contains numerous examples of events that you have likely read about in other books. The book has dozens of quotes from other authors that you have likely heard before. This book lacks any new ideas or concepts. The book strongly pushes religion, with a focus on the Jewish religion. The author wrote this book for himself as an auto biography, not to teach wisdom to a wider audience.

I listened to the audio book. The narration was good and audio book is a good format for this material.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Egocentric tale of how to be less egocentric

I heard David Brooks speak live about this topic, and the essence makes a good talk in that overly-earnest, TED-talk way where the message can be distilled to pithy quotes, cherry-picked stories and simplified bullet points. As a book, it's not particularly good and felt like it is David Brooks describing how he wants David Brooks to be. And then, of course, we are urged to be more like that ourselves.

Perhaps the biggest point is that we all should be less individualistic and woven into the community, because the highest calling as a person is to be integrated with and passionate about the community. Brooks is thrilled because he figured that out in "the valley" and moved on. What if you don't have the talent as a "weaver" or simply don't feel like being so outwardly focused? Or you either are happy on the first mountain or have been on the second mountain all along? In the first case, are you a lesser person?

I skimmed many of the stories because I got the point he was making, and didn't really care to read about how wonderful person X was. The quotes piled up, too. Brooks mentions how he writes his column by gathering up piles of material and pulling from the various piles. That seemed to be the style here, too, merging in this story or that extract without much overall synthesis. That's ok here, just less interesting.

The material about transition to faith along a personal journey and his Jew vs. Christian dilemma was curious, and somewhat tangential to the Second Mountain theme, as you can be a "weaver" with or without any religious faith, just as you can be highly individualistic. Here the writing felt more like a book and less like a TED talk. I cringed a bit in the retelling of how Anne went from assistant to wife, sorry.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Something of a Secular Ecclesiastes

David Brooks, author, speaker, executive director of the Aspen Institute and launcher of the WEAVE program, has handed the American public something of a secular version of the biblical book of Ecclesiastes in his recently published "The Second Mountain: The Quest for a Moral Life". This 384 page hardback is clearly friendly to faith, family, community and conjugality. And it is filled with words from a man who has entered a new stage of life where he looks back over his years seeing that in some ways, much of it was vanity of vanities and chasing after the wind. Or, as he puts it, "For many, the big choices in life often aren't really choices; they are quicksand. You just sink into the place you happen to be standing" (108). But what matters most is enjoying your life, your wife, the sun and the night, the neighborhood wherein you live, and the people with whom you engage. But unlike Ecclesiastes, there is no final end of the matter; there is no fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man conclusion.

Though Brooks writes a valuable script that will resonate well with many people of faith, much of the motive seems to be the very individualism he is trying to curb. It will make my world better if you and I do these thing; it will make you and me fulfilled if we share lovingkindness and build community; it will give your kids and mine a more wholesome future; etc. Don't get me wrong. I loved reading the book, and the author has done a masterful job unpacking the importance of faith and family, ritual and relationships, community and calling. Also, there are several bright and budding perceptions - such as the two chapters on the stages of community building. In the end, though, the subtle pull was "me". How I can be part of something bigger, better, and more blessed that I might find fulfillment. This is really my only critique, and why I call it something of a secular version of Ecclesiastes.

Yet, the overwhelming tenor of the book is healthy and wholesome! For example, as he unpacks the telos crisis in many American lives, he will hit a nerve and raise many voices of agreement. As he walks us through the social valley between the two mountains, we will be nodding our heads affirmatively as he traces out the loneliness crisis, the distrust, the crisis of meaning, the growing and raging tribalism, and suffering. I was beset on many sides while delving into the book; furiously marking it up here and jotting notes there. Much in this manuscript will feed the heart and stoke the fires of purpose. Surely Brooks is correct in seeing that our "society has become a conspiracy against joy" (xxii), and he, for one, is seeking to do something about it! Do we dare join the movement?

It was good for my soul to read "The Second Mountain". Many of Brooks's concerns about the rising suicides, intensifying anxieties and violent melees in our day are my concerns as well. And the overwhelming discussions, designs and directions gave me lots to ponder. Not only will a host of Boomers find the book valuable, but I think Xers, Millennials and iGens (or whatever they will be called) will be rescued form many a wrong turn as they read and learn. If it is at all possible, I encourage you to pick up a copy and read it before the month is out. I happily recommend the book.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Strung together quotes

It’s a collection of other people’s thoughts, nothing innovative here. Though it takes on a Right Wing slant the further on you read. I threw it down after about 75 pages. Not well-written or particularly insightful, with a pernicious and nasty undercurrent through it.
1 people found this helpful