The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief
The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief book cover

The Napoleon of Crime: The Life and Times of Adam Worth, Master Thief

Paperback – July 6, 1998

Price
$49.07
Format
Paperback
Pages
384
Publisher
Delta
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385319935
Dimensions
5.5 x 0.75 x 8 inches
Weight
10.4 ounces

Description

From the Publisher "Fascinating...a brisk, lively, colorful biography of an amazing criminal." --The New York Times "Adam Worth, the greatest thief of the 19th century, could have furnished the basis of a great novel...Ben Macintyre has given him a biography that reads like one." --Los Angeles Times Book Review A New York Times Notable Book From the Inside Flap <i>He is the Napoleon of crime, Watson.<br>He is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city.<br>He is a genius, a philosopher, an abstract thinker. . . . </i><br>--Sherlock Holmes on Professor Moriarty in "The Final Problem"<br><br>The Victorian era's most infamous thief, Adam Worth was the original Napoleon of crime.xa0xa0Suave, cunning Worth learned early that the best way to succeed was to steal.xa0xa0And steal he did.<br><br>Following a strict code of honor, Worth won the respect of Victorian society.xa0xa0He also aroused its fear by becoming a chilling phantom, mingling undetected with the upper classes, whose valuables he brazenly stole.xa0xa0His most celebrated heist: Gainsborough's grand portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire--ancestor of Diana, Princess of Wales--a painting Worth adored and often slept with for twenty years.<br><br>With a brilliant gang that included "Piano" Charley, a jewel thief, train robber, and playboy, and "the Scratch" Becker, master forger, Worth secretly ran operations from New York to London, Paris, and South Africa--until betrayal and a Pinkerton man finally brought him down.<br><br>In a decadent age, Worth was an icon.xa0xa0His biography is a grand, dazzling tour into the gaslit underworld of the last century.xa0xa0.xa0xa0.xa0xa0and into the doomed genius of a criminal mastermind. Ben Macintyre is the author of Forgotten Fatherland: The Search for Elisabeth Nietzsche and is the Paris bureau chief for The Times (London).xa0xa0He lives in Paris with his family. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. The Elopement On a misty May midnight in the year 1876, three men emerged from a fashionable address in Piccadilly with top hats on their heads, money in their pockets, and burglary, on a grand scale, on their minds.xa0xa0At a deliberate pace the trio headed along the thoroughfare, and at the point where Piccadilly intersects with Old Bond Street, they came to a stop.xa0xa0Famed for its art galleries and antiques shops, the street by day was choked with the carriages of the wealthy, the well-bred, and the culturally well-informed.xa0xa0Now it was quite deserted.The three men exchanged a few words at the corner of the street before one slipped into a doorway, invisible beyond the dancing gaslight shadows, while the other two turned right into Old Bond Street.xa0xa0They made an incongruous pair as they walked on: one was slight and dapper, some thirty-five years in age, with long, clipped mustaches, and dressed in the height of modern elegance, complete with pearl buttons and gold watch chain.xa0xa0The other, ambling a few paces behind, was a towering fellow with grizzled mutton-chop whiskers, whose ill-fitting frock coat barely contained a barrel chest.xa0xa0Had anyone been there to observe the couple, they might have assumed them to be a rich man taking the night air with his unprepossessing valet after a substantial dinner at his club.Outside the art gallery of Thomas Agnew & Sons, at number 39, Old Bond Street, the two men paused, and while the aristocrat extinguished his cheroot and admired his own faint but stylish reflection in the glass, his brutish companion glanced furtively up and down the street.xa0xa0Then, at a word from his master, the giant flattened himself against the wall and joined his hands in a stirrup, into which the smaller man placed a well-shod foot, for all the world as if he were climbing onto a thoroughbred.xa0xa0With a grunt the big man heaved the little fellow up the wall and in a moment he had scrambled nimbly onto the window ledge some fifteen feet above the pavement.xa0xa0Balancing precariously, he whipped out a small crow bar, wrenched open the casement window, and slipped inside, as his companion vanished from sight beneath the gallery portal.The room was unfurnished and unlit, but by the faint glow from the pavement gaslight a large painting in a gilt frame could be discerned on the opposite wall.xa0xa0The little man removed his hat as he drew closer.The woman in the portrait, already famed throughout London as the most exquisite beauty ever to grace a canvas, gazed down with an imperious and inquisitive eye.xa0xa0Curls cascaded from beneath a broad-brimmed hat set at a rakish angle to frame a painted glance at once beckoning and mocking, and a smile just one quiver short of a full pout.The faint rumble of a night watchman's snores wafted up from the room below, as the little gentleman unclipped a thick velvet rope that held the inquisitive public back from the painting during daylight hours.xa0xa0Extracting a sharp blade from his pocket, with infinite care he cut the portrait from its frame and laid it on the gallery floor.xa0xa0From his coat he took a small pot of paste, and using the tasseled end of the velvet rope, he daubed the back of the canvas to make it supple and then rolled it up with the paint facing outward to avoid cracking the surface, before slipping it inside his frock coat.A few seconds later he had scrambled back down his monstrous assistant to the street below.xa0xa0A low whistle summoned the lookout from his street corner, and with jaunty step the little dandy set off back down Piccadilly, the stolen portrait pressed to his breast and his two rascally companions trailing behind.The painted lady was Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, once celebrated as the fairest and wickedest woman in Georgian England.xa0xa0The painter was the great Thomas Gainsborough, who had executed this, one of his greatest portraits, around 1787.xa0xa0A few weeks before the events just recounted, the painting had been sold at auction for 10,000 guineas, at that time the highest price ever paid for a work of art, causing a sensation.xa0xa0Georgiana of Devonshire, nÚe Spencer, was once again the talk of London, much as her great-great-great-grandniece Diana, Princess of Wales, nÚe Spencer, would become in our age.During Georgiana's lifetime, which ended in 1806, her admirers vied to pay tribute to "the amenity and graces of her deportment, her irresistible manners, and the seduction of her society." Her detractors, however, considered her a shameless harpy, a gambler, a drunk, and a threat to civilized morals who openly lived in a mÚnage-Ó-trois with her husband and his mistress.xa0xa0No woman of the time aroused more envy, or provoked more gossip.The sale of Gainsborough's great painting to the art dealer William Agnew in 1876 had been the occasion for a fresh burst of Georgiana mania.xa0xa0Gainsborough's vision of enigmatic loveliness, and the extraordinary value now attached to it, became the talk of London.xa0xa0Victorian commentators, like their eighteenth-century predecessors, heaped praise once more on this icon of female beauty, while rehearsing some of the fruitier aspects of her sexual history.When the painting was stolen, the public interest in Gainsborough's Duchess reached fever pitch.xa0xa0The painting acquired huge cultural and sexual symbolism.xa0xa0It was praised, reproduced, and parodied time and again, the Marilyn Monroe poster of its day, while Georgiana herself was again held up as the ultimate symbol of feminine coquetry.The name of the man who kidnapped the Duchess that night in 1876 was Adam Worth, alias Henry J. Raymond, wealthy resident of Mayfair, sporting gentleman about town, and criminal mastermind.xa0xa0At the time of the theft Worth was at the peak of his powers, controlling a small army of lesser felons in an astonishing criminal industry.xa0xa0Stealing the picture was an act of larceny, but also one of hubris and romance.xa0xa0Georgiana and her portrait represented the pinnacle of English high society.xa0xa0Worth, by contrast, was a German-born Jew raised in abject poverty in America who, through an unbroken record of crime, had assembled the trappings of English privilege and status, and every appearance of virtue.xa0xa0The grand duchess had died seventy years before Worth decided, in his own words, to "elope" with her portrait, beginning a strange, true Victorian love affair between a crook and a canvas. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • He is the Napoleon of crime, Watson.He is the organizer of half that is evil and of nearly all that is undetected in this great city.He is a genius, a philosopher, an abstract thinker. . . .
  • --Sherlock Holmes on Professor Moriarty in "The Final Problem"The Victorian era's most infamous thief, Adam Worth was the original Napoleon of crime.  Suave, cunning Worth learned early that the best way to succeed was to steal.  And steal he did.Following a strict code of honor, Worth won the respect of Victorian society.  He also aroused its fear by becoming a chilling phantom, mingling undetected with the upper classes, whose valuables he brazenly stole.  His most celebrated heist: Gainsborough's grand portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire--ancestor of Diana, Princess of Wales--a painting Worth adored and often slept with for twenty years.With a brilliant gang that included "Piano" Charley, a jewel thief, train robber, and playboy, and "the Scratch" Becker, master forger, Worth secretly ran operations from New York to London, Paris, and South Africa--until betrayal and a Pinkerton man finally brought him down.In a decadent age, Worth was an icon.  His biography is a grand, dazzling tour into the gaslit underworld of the last century.  .  .  and into the doomed genius of a criminal mastermind.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(332)
★★★★
25%
(276)
★★★
15%
(166)
★★
7%
(77)
23%
(254)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The REAL father of organized, not to say civilized, crime

A gentleman burglar thumbs his nose at 'impregnable security' in a gallery and steals a priceless portrait of a scandalous woman by literally standing on the shoulders of a giant; then falls in love with the painting and 'elopes' with it for the next twenty years, eventually collecting the award for its return (in disguise) with the help of the detective who first hunted, then befriended, him.
This is the stuff of fiction? No, it all actually happened. Adam Worth was an anomaly even by the standards of his own time (he disdained killing) and preferred to organize teams of cracksmen to maintain his highly organized "web of crime" in London.
It is not surprising to find that Worth was the original of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Professor Moriarty and that he earned the profound respect of his personal Sherlock Holmes, Alan Pinkerton. Worth was a self-made man in a very literal sense, from a poor immigrant German/Jewish background. He reinvented himself as an English gentleman and trained an Irish barmaid, Kitty Flynn, to improve her speech and deportment to pass as a Lady. Flynn eventually married a real sugar daddy and became a 'great lady' in a very literal sense, thereby making Worth and Flynn the originals of Henry Higgins and Eliza Doolittle as well as of Professor Moriarty and Kitty Winter.
This is a book filled with incredibly colorful characters who specialized in a genteel style of crime. I thank the author for providing information on my favorite New York fence, "Moms" Mandelbaum, and the safecracker "Baron" Max Shinburn (who is immortalized along with his enemy, Worth, in the Sherlock Holmes stories.)By the way, a character very similar to Worth is played magnificently by Sean Connery in THE GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY.
Truth really is stranger than fiction. I enjoyed this book very much and can highly recommend it to others.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Missed his Target

I have mixed feelings about this book. On the one hand, the subject matter is guaranteed to fascinate. Adam Worth was a truly bizarre and unique character who knew and was related to several famous people. The book is also very well-written.

My complaint is that the author often seems not really very interested in his subject, Adam Worth. Large sections of the book--including the beggining and the end--are not about Adam Worth at all. The author seems obsessed with the Gainsborough painting, The Duchess of Devonshire. Admittedly, stealing this painting was perhaps Worth's most famous crime and would certainly have rated a chapter. However, Macintyre drones on and on and on about the painter, the history of the painting, the many people who have owned the painting, wholly unsupported psychological assertions about the painting's affect on Worth. He devotes an entire chapter just to J.P. Morgan, who Worth never met nor stole from. Morgan rates a chapter simply because he was the last owner of the Gainsborough.

This is a basically good book that is fatally flawed by the author's tendency to obsess about what is a peripherial issue. Too bad. If you are an art historian I can recommend this book whole-heartedly. If you are interested in a biography of Adam Worth, I recommend the book only with reservations.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An ethical master thief admired by his pursuers

A very interesting look at two very complex and enigmatic people; Adam Worth and William Pinkerton. One is a life lived in the shadows, the other a life pursuing people with whom he felt a kindred spirit. There seems to be enough light to shed both interest and information on the subject, yet somehow one still feels unsatisfied, as if there was a great deal more to tell. This is probably due in large measure to the intentional obscurity with which Worth lived his double life and the protection Pinkerton gave his. The psychological analysis of Worth is fascinating, but in making the connection between Worth and Moriarity (as well as the Freudian conclusions about Worth and the painting of the Duchess of Devonshire) the author goes a bit far afield after he has already made his point. This somewhat damages the credibility of his objectivity. Even if the outcome remains the same, the author seems to have invested to much of his ego in his conclusions and strains to prove his points. Overall a fascinating look at a man who probably was the best crook of all time, an interesting example of Victorian hypocrisy turned upside down, and one of strangest frienships next to Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday. If the book accomplished one surprising result, it was to send me looking for more information on the Pinkerton family, one of the more interesting and unique families in American history. A genuinely fascinating read conducted with style by the author.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Misleading Title

I agree with the reviewers saying this book missed its target. It seems like MacIntyre couldn't find sufficient material for a book about Adam Worth, but went ahead and wrote it anyway. My guess is that there's plenty of information about "The Duchess of Devonshire," and so MacIntyre used that to pad out his manuscript. Worth pulled off plenty of other capers, and I'd like to read about those. What I don't want to read is the author's unsubstantiated speculation about Worth's psyche.

If you're interested in the provenance of the "Duchess," this book might be an interesting read. Otherwise, I'd recommend Asbury's "Gangs of New York." Two of Worth's contemporaries and sometime associates also wrote books which might be worth tracking down. These were Sophie Lyons and William Pinkerton.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Terribly disappointing

If you meander through all these reviews, checking the lower-rated ones, you will get a fairly accurate view of this book. I have read hundreds of true crime books, and this ranks near the bottom. It is a fascinating topic. Or should be. But in the hands of this author, it is a tedious, irritating, blather. Let me explain.

Two of my favorite reads in the past few years make interesting comparisons. Big Trouble by J. Anthony Lukas was one of the most fascinating books I've ever read. Lukas wandered far and wide, reeling in everything and everyone, and in doing so, built a portrait of a time and place that was riveting. Every detail was useful, every speculation added value. Some of the reviewers found the rambles bothersome; I have rarely finished such a big book wishing it were even longer, but Big Trouble left me wanting more.

A similar book was Dark Horse by Kenneth Ackerman. Extraneous details were seamlessly woven into the tale, making the world come alive and the characters multi-dimensional. I could almost hear the creak of boots and smell the cigar smoke. Skilled writing and skilled choosing.

But this book ambles pointlessly, dragging in details that are neither of interest in themselves nor add to the tale being told. Long excursions into the lives of everyone who wanders into the main tale, endless condescending sermonizing about Victorian moralizing and double-standards, repetitive and irritating discursions into the "double" which the author seems to think the Victorians invented, and the most silly and irritating speculation sink this tale. Which is amazing, for the story of Adam Worth in the hands of the most plodding storyteller should be gripping. The man was a doer of great evil (which Macintyre blows off rather casually; Adam Worth left a wake of broken businesses, crushed dreams, falsely accused victims, and bankrupted people, but because he shot no one, and was "elegant" it seems OK.) He committed some astonishingly brave and brazen crimes. But there just isn't enough there that we can know, so invented details that grow wearying are heaped on.

At one point, Macintyre compares Worth to Captain Nemo. Now, this is a weak comparison on its own grounds, but then we get something about "no one knows if Worth read the book, but if he did, he would certainly see himself there." Now there's a pointless speculation. One of the common tactics of authors trying to puff up a lesser talent is to compare their achievements in some irrelevant way. "As Shakespeare did, So-and-so lived in Stratford," thereby gratuitously tying a grade z author and an acknowledged master. At gerat length the author "compares and contrasts" Worth and J.P. Morgan, in a stupendously overblown manner. Over and over we are told how Worth would have enjoyed this quip by Wilde. Give us a break, pal. The guy was a crook, a scuzz, a humbug, and a thug who hurt many, many people, much like Melmotte in Trollope's novel, The Way We Live Now (another book we don't know if Worth read.)
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I just had $20 "lifted" without realizing it.

I am a fast walker. Olympic fast. It isn't something I am even aware of until a laggard points it out to me. A laggard-or a trio of muggers.

The first time I was mugged I was in London. Forging ahead of my leisurely-paced family, threading through a British crowd that tended to pass me on the incorrect side, I bumped into a chap, which sent me into oncoming pedestrian traffic where I was nearly bowled over by a man twice my size. The next thing I know, the very large man is holding me by the cuff, nearly lifting me off the ground and yelling with an accent too thick to comprehend.

I was in the middle of apologizing profusely when my step-father rushed up and told the chap to bugger-off (my step-father was fluent in the local dialects). What I thought was an accident and misunderstanding was actually a choreographed ballet performed by a trio of con artists. Patting my pockets for my tube pass, and finding nothing, I realized that I had been mugged. My mother, who insisted that I wear a humiliating pouch around my neck full of money, passports, room keys and the like was extremely pleased with herself.

When I think of crime I tend to think of the smallest subset. Murder. Rape. Mayhem. They are interesting precisely because they are unusual. However, in terms of dollars, employee theft is greater than auto theft year-after-year in the United States. Just as a bathtub is more likely to kill you than a snake or a stranger, our focus is on the extreme rather than on the likely. This makes us perfect dupes for the crimes that have a much bigger impact on our lives. Crimes like e-mail scams, identity theft, pickpocketing, and representative government.

The type of mugging I experienced in London is called "Team-Dipping" or "Pulling". The man that initiated the contact was the "stickman", he would be the gentleman leaving with nothing more than a tube ticket (thanks mom). After pushing me into the "stall", he would have doubled back and taken the goods from the "hook" or "mechanic" that was "fanning" me. What role was I playing? I was the "mark". The 15-year old moron walking alone along a crowded London sidewalk at night, ogling my surroundings like a bewildered tourist.

This type of crime and terminology are probably as old as money. I'll wager that the day a tribe member thought of trading shells, three other hominids figured out a scheme to part those shells from suckers like me. Techniques improved over time, and hours of practice have turned some practitioners into artists. Virtuosos in the skills that allow one to rob with grace. Just check out the video of Bob Arno, a modern master pickpocket, in the featured video to the right. He can pocket your Rolex with a hand-shake and even get the tie and suspenders off of you in a flash.

One of the greats in this seedy world of subterfuge is the "Napoleon" in Ben Macintyre's book The Napoleon of Crime: Adam Worth. The comparison to Napoleon works on many levels-Adam Worth was short in stature, a charismatic leader of men, ambitious and wildly successful. Adam Worth was also simultaneously ruthless, yet possessed a very strict moral code that guided him throughout his life of crime. Central to this was his abhorrence of violence and anyone who employed it their criminal pursuits.

The Napoleon of Crime is meticulously researched. A feat that can not be appreciated fully without understanding the complete dearth of material on Adam Worth. Pulled together from hundreds of sources, Macintyre does an outstanding job of creating a full sketch of Worth's life. A life that went from scamming Civil War pay by repeatedly enlisting and deserting, to a daring escape from Sing Sing, to robbing diamond convoys in Africa and nabbing the most treasured painting in London at the height of its popularity.

Just as fascinating is the character of William Pinkerton, a lawman and adversary of Worth's who ends up incredibly intertwined with Worth and his exploits by the end of the tale. Other fascinating characters populate the book, such as Worth's veritable army of henchmen, each with names, descriptions and abilities that seem too cliche to be true. But if the similarities between this cast and those that act out our fiction are eerily similar, it is no coincidence. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle based his infamous baddie, Moriarty, on Adam Worth!

The Napoleon of Crime does quite a bit right. I already complimented the excellent research that went into compiling the book. The subject matter is interesting and the time period is richly detailed. But something felt dry in the reading. Normally I plow through non-fiction like this in a pace not different from the way I walk. But this book took some effort. It just wasn't as pleasurable a read as it should have been. I wish I could blame it on my personal fancy, but knowing my tastes compared to others, I might be erring on the side of optimism.

I wish I could give the book 2.5 stars, because it doesn't merit a lowly 2. I just can't round up in this case, though, and present my score with a disclaimer: If you enjoy the subject matter or the period detailed in this book, The Napoleon of Crime will interest you. Everyone else should pick up Chrichton's The Great Train Robbery instead. You will learn just as much but have a better time doing it.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A magnificent obsession

Evoking all the moral ambiguity of the Victorian Era, Macintyre offers an intriguing portrait of its most accomplished criminal. Adam Worth, alias Henry Raymond (a name appropriated from the recently deceased founder and editor of the "New York Times") masterminded a series of crimes on three continents, rarely participating in them directly and deploring the use of weapons as a failure of the intellect. While his ill-gotten gains allowed him to live unscathed for some years as an English gentleman, the crime central to this biography was one from which he derived no financial benefit for a quarter century.
His personal theft of a Gainsborough portrait of Georgiana, Dutchess of Devonshire, began an association which, in the author's estimate, became an obsession. At the time, Worth was involved in an amicable menage a trois with his partner, Piano Charley Bullard, and an ambitious Irish woman, Kitty Flynn. Kitty elected to marry Bullard but both men enjoyed her favors and two daughters born during the marriage were widely viewed to be Worth's. A year before the theft, she had left for New York, divorced Bullard, and become engaged to another man. It was her action which "pushed Worth into matrimony, but of a very different sort: his elopement with the Dutchess was now transformed into a full-fledged marriage..."
In addition to the rogues' gallery about Worth, all interesting in their own right, two figures stand out: William Pinkerton and J. Pierpont Morgan. Together, they provide the socially respectable base with Worth at the incongruous apex. Pinkerton's avowed purpose of ferreting out wrong-doers did not preclude his admiration for Worth's achievements and he would ultimately become a trusted friend, serving as intermediary for the return of the portrait to its rightful owners. The robber baron Morgan, who would purchase the painting upon its return, appears as Worth's socially respectable counterpart, his outward veneer of propriety concealing sexual incontinence "to an almost pathological degree."
Macintyre has done a fine job in describing the impact of both Worth and the portrait on popular culture: Conan Doyle's Professor Moriarity is the fictional embodiment of the master criminal and successive generations have been fascinated with Georgiana as represented in the painting.
This is a thoroughly enjoyable biography, written with wit and considerable compassion for its complex subject.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Heady mix of art, mystery and human fallibility

Adam Worth, the inspiration for Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's fictional evil mastermind Moriaty, makes a meaty subject for a book under any circumstances. From manager of gaming Hells and forger to diamond and art thief - his criminal career is breath-takingly audacious.
But that isn't where it ends, the story of Adam Worth includes a mystery of a famously stolen portrait, a determined Pinkerton detective and a tale which takes you across four continents.
Ben McIntyre keeps us in full charge of the facts of the life of Worth, and researching it must have been a trial in itself, for as he acknowledges at the beginning of the book, Worth was notoriously cagey about his life leaving few records apart from some coded letters.
The thing that drew me, originally to this book was the story of the portrait of the Duchess of Devonshire. This picture was made for adventure 100 years before Worth stole it. Painted by Gainsborough sometime in 1787 it disappeared shortly afterwards, for reasons unknown, and turned up, a little the worse for wear, over the fireside of some dear old biddy in 1830. Back in the mainstream again it turned up for action in the 1870's bringing in the highest price for a portrait to that date. It was then that Worth saw it, and determined to steal it. And it was here that their two fates, that of the portrait, and that of Adam Worth become inextricably linked.
For the next 25 years as Worth travelled the world pursuing his various illegal schemes, the portrait travelled with him. A remarkably audacious act in itself - but then Worth was an audacious and confident man.
I never felt overwhelmed by the psychological analysis of Worth in this book. In fact I found Macintyre's style easy to read, and his ability to blend the many disparate facts and vast array of colourful characters that peppered Worth's life, excellent.
This is great story and a great book.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not for fans of Confessions of A Jewel Thief

I picked this book up because it is heavily promoted by Amazon with Confessions of a Jewel Thief, Bill Mason's larger than life book about being a burglar. These books have nearly nothing in common other than fitting into the true crime genre. Macintyre misses the mark by getting bogged down in details and random facts (his research is impressive, yes) and forgetting to spin a compelling tale. There is too much material here with no cohesive narrative. Many other readers have hit it in the head by identifying the failings of Mason to focus solely on the topic of Worth and his exploits.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

napolean

this book is really good---
2 people found this helpful