The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society
The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society book cover

The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society

Paperback – May 5, 2009

Price
$10.75
Format
Paperback
Pages
290
Publisher
Dial Press Trade Paperback
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385341004
Dimensions
5.12 x 0.67 x 7.97 inches
Weight
7.8 ounces

Description

“I can’t remember the last time I discovered a novel as smart and delightful as this one, a world so vivid that I kept forgetting this was a work of fiction populated with characters so utterly wonderful that I kept forgetting they weren’t my actual friends and neighbors. Treat yourself to this book please—I can’t recommend it highly enough.” —Elizabeth Gilbert, author of Eat, Pray, Love “Traditional without seeming stale, and romantic without being naive . . . It’s tempting to throw around terms like ‘gem’ when reading a book like this. But Guernsey is not precious. . . . This is a book for firesides or long train rides. It’s as charming and timeless as the novels for which its characters profess their love.” — San Francisco Chronicle Book Review “[The] characters step from the past radiant with eccentricity and kindly humour. [The] writing, with its delicately offbeat, self-deprecating stylishness, is exquisitely turned.” — The Guardian (U.K.) “I’ve never wanted to join a club so desperately as I did while reading Guernsey . . . . [The novel] is a labor of love and it shows on almost every page.” — The Christian Science Monitor “I could not put the book down. I have recommended it to all my friends.” — Newsday “A jewel . . . Poignant and keenly observed, Guernsey is a small masterpiece about love, war, and the immeasurable sustenance to be found in good books and good friends.” — People “A book-lover's delight, an implicit and sometimes explicit paean to all things literary.” — Chicago Sun-Times “A sparkling epistolary novel radiating wit, lightly worn erudition and written with great assurance and aplomb.” — The Sunday Times (London) “Cooked perfectly à point: subtle and elegant in flavour, yet emotionally satisfying to the finish.” — The Times (London) “A sweet, sentimental paean to books and those who love them. . . . It affirms the power of books to nourish people enduring hard times.” — Thexa0Washington Post Book World “[A] marvelous debut . . . This is a warm, funny, tender, and thoroughly entertaining celebration of the power of the written word.” — Library Journal “A poignant, funny novel that celebrates the resilience of the human spirit. . . . A treat.” — Thexa0Boston Globe “A sure winner.” — Kirkus Reviews “Delightful . . . One of those joyful books that celebrates how reading brings people together.” — New Orleans Times-Picayune “Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows have written a wondrous, delightful, poignant book—xa0part Jane Austen, part history lesson. The lettersxa0aren't addressedxa0to you, but they are meant for you. It's a bookxa0everyone should read. An absolute treasure.” —Sarah Addison Allen, author of Garden Spells Mary Ann Shaffer who passed away in February 2008, worked as an editor, librarian, and in bookshops. The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society was her first novel. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Part One 8th January, 1946Mr. Sidney Stark, PublisherStephens & Stark Ltd.21 St. James's PlaceLondon S.W.1EnglandDear Sidney,Susan Scott is a wonder. We sold over forty copies of the book, which was very pleasant, but much more thrilling from my standpoint was the food. Susan managed to procure ration coupons for icing sugar and real eggs for the meringue. If all her literary luncheons are going to achieve these heights, I won't mind touring about the country. Do you suppose that a lavish bonus could spur her on to butter? Let's try it—you may deduct the money from my royalties.Now for my grim news. You asked me how work on my new book is progressing. Sidney, it isn't.English Foibles seemed so promising at first. After all, one should be able to write reams about the Society to Protest the Glorification of the English Bunny. I unearthed a photograph of the Vermin Exterminators' Trade Union, marching down an Oxford street with placards screaming "Down with Beatrix Potter!" But what is there to write about after a caption? Nothing, that's what.I no longer want to write this book—my head and my heart just aren't in it. Dear as Izzy Bickerstaff is—and was—to me, I don't want to write anything else under that name. I don't want to be considered a light-hearted journalist anymore. I do acknowledge that making readers laugh—or at least chuckle—during the war was no mean feat, but I don't want to do it anymore. I can't seem to dredge up any sense of proportion or balance these days, and God knows one cannot write humor without them.In the meantime, I am very happy Stephens & Stark is making money on Izzy Bickerstaff Goes to War. It relieves my conscience over the debacle of my Anne Bront biography.My thanks for everything and love,JulietP.S. I am reading the collected correspondence of Mrs. Montagu. Do you know what that dismal woman wrote to Jane Carlyle? "My dear little Jane, everybody is born with a vocation, and yours is to write charming little notes." I hope Jane spat on her.From Sidney to Juliet10th January, 1946Miss Juliet Ashton23 Glebe PlaceChelseaLondon S.W. 3Dear Juliet:Congratulations! Susan Scott said you took to the audience at the luncheon like a drunkard to rum—and they to you—so please stop worrying about your tour next week. I haven't a doubt of your success. Having witnessed your electrifying performance of "The Shepherd Boy Sings in the Valley of Humiliation" eighteen years ago, I know you will have every listener coiled around your little finger within moments. A hint: perhaps in this case, you should refrain from throwing the book at the audience when you finish. Susan is looking forward to ushering you through bookshops from Bath to Yorkshire. And of course, Sophie is agitating for an extension of the tour into Scotland. I've told her in my most infuriating older-brother manner that It Remains To Be Seen. She misses you terribly, I know, but Stephens & Stark must be impervious to such considerations.I've just received Izzy's sales figures from London and the Home Counties—they are excellent. Again, congratulations! Don't fret about English Foibles; better that your enthusiasm died now than after six months spent writing about bunnies. The crass commercial possibilities of the idea were attractive, but I agree that the topic would soon grow horribly fey. Another subject—one you'll like—will occur to you.Dinner one evening before you go? Say when.Love,SidneyP.S. You write charming little notes.From Juliet to Sidney11th January, 1946Dear Sidney,Yes, lovely—can it be somewhere on the river? I want oysters and champagne and roast beef, if obtainable; if not, a chicken will do. I am very happy that Izzy's sales are good. Are they good enough that I don't have to pack a bag and leave London?Since you and S&S have turned me into a moderately successful author, dinner must be my treat.Love,JulietP.S. I did not throw "The Shepherd Boy Sings in the Valley of Humiliation" at the audience. I threw it at the elocution mistress. I meant to cast it at her feet, but I missed.From Juliet to Sophie Strachan12th January, 1946Mrs. Alexander StrachanFeochan Farmby Oban ArgyllDear Sophie,Of course I'd adore to see you, but I am a soul-less, will-less automaton. I have been ordered by Sidney to Bath, Colchester, Leeds, and several other garden spots I can't recall at the moment, and I can't just slither off to Scotland instead. Sidney's brow would lower—his eyes would narrow—he would stalk. You know how nerve-racking it is when Sidney stalks. I wish I could sneak away to your farm and have you coddle me. You'd let me put my feet on the sofa, wouldn't you? And then you'd tuck blankets around me and bring me tea? Would Alexander mind a permanent resident on his sofa? You've told me he is a patient man, but perhaps he would find it annoying. Why am I so melancholy? I should be delighted at the prospect of reading Izzy to an entranced audience. You know how I love talking about books, and you know how I adore receiving compliments. I should be thrilled. But the truth is that I'm gloomy—gloomier than I ever was during the war. Everything is so broken, Sophie: the roads, the buildings, the people. Especially the people. This is probably the aftereffect of a horrid dinner party I went to last night. The food was ghastly, but that was to be expected. It was the guests who unnerved me—they were the most demoralizing collection of individuals I've ever encountered. The talk was of bombs and starvation. Do you remember Sarah Morecroft? She was there, all bones and gooseflesh and bloody lipstick. Didn't she use to be pretty? Wasn't she mad for that horse-riding fellow who went up to Cambridge? He was nowhere in evidence; she's married to a doctor with grey skin who clicks his tongue before he speaks. And he was a figure of wild romance compared to my dinner partner, who just happened to be a single man, presumably the last one on earth—oh Lord, how miserably mean-spirited I sound!I swear, Sophie, I think there's something wrong with me. Every man I meet is intolerable. Perhaps I should set my sights lower—not so low as the grey doctor who clicks, but a bit lower. I can't even blame it on the war—I was never very good at men, was I? Do you suppose the St. Swithin's furnace-man was my one true love? Since I never spoke to him, it seems unlikely, but at least it was a passion unscathed by disappointment. And he had that beautiful black hair. After that, you remember, came the Year of Poets. Sidney's quite snarky about those poets, though I don't see why, since he introduced me to them. Then poor Adrian. Oh, there's no need to recite the dread rolls to you, but Sophie—what is the matter with me? Am I too particular? I don't want to be married just to be married. I can't think of anything lonelier than spending the rest of my life with someone I can't talk to, or worse, someone I can't be silent with.What a dreadful, complaining letter. You see? I've succeeded in making you feel relieved that I won't be stopping in Scotland. But then again, I may—my fate rests with Sidney. Kiss Dominic for me and tell him I saw a rat the size of a terrier the other day.Love to Alexander and even more to you,JulietFrom Dawsey Adams, Guernsey, Channel Islands, to Juliet12th January, 1946Miss Juliet Ashton81 Oakley StreetChelseaLondon S.W. 3Dear Miss Ashton,My name is Dawsey Adams, and I live on my farm in St. Martin's Parish on Guernsey. I know of you because I have an old book that once belonged to you—the Selected Essays of Elia, by an author whose name in real life was Charles Lamb. Your name and address were written inside the front cover.I will speak plain—I love Charles Lamb. My own book says Selected, so I wondered if that meant he had written other things to choose from? These are the pieces I want to read, and though the Germans are gone now, there aren't any bookshops left on Guernsey. I want to ask a kindness of you. Could you send me the name and address of a bookshop in London? I would like to order more of Charles Lamb's writings by post. I would also like to ask if anyone has ever written his life story, and if they have, could a copy be found for me? For all his bright and turning mind, I think Mr. Lamb must have had a great sadness in his life.Charles Lamb made me laugh during the German Occupation, especially when he wrote about the roast pig. The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society came into being because of a roast pig we had to keep secret from the German soldiers, so I feel a kinship to Mr. Lamb.I am sorry to bother you, but I would be sorrier still not to know about him, as his writings have made me his friend.Hoping not to trouble you,Dawsey AdamsP.S. My friend Mrs. Maugery bought a pamphlet that once belonged to you, too. It is called Was There a Burning Bush? A Defense of Moses and the Ten Commandments. She liked your margin note, "Word of God or crowd control???" Did you ever decide which?From Juliet to Dawsey15th January, 1946Mr. Dawsey AdamsLes VauxlarensLa BoureeSt. Martin's, GuernseyDear Mr. Adams,I no longer live on Oakley Street, but I'm so glad that your letter found me and that my book found you. It was a sad wrench to part with the Selected Essays of Elia. I had two copies and a dire need of shelf-room, but I felt like a traitor selling it. You have soothed my conscience. I wonder how the book got to Guernsey? Perhaps there is some secret sort of homing instinct in books that brings them to their perfect readers. How delightful if that were true.Because there is nothing I would rather do than rummage through bookshops, I went at once to Hastings & Sons upon receiving your letter. I have gone to them for years, always finding the one book I wanted—and then three more I hadn't known I wanted. I told Mr. Hastings you would like a good, clean copy (and not a rare edition) of More Essays of Elia. He will send it to you by separate post (invoice enclosed) and was delighted to know you are also a lover of Charles Lamb. He said the best biography of Lamb was by E. V. Lucas, and he would hunt out a copy for you, though it may take a while. In the meantime, will you accept this small gift from me? It is his Selected Letters. I think it will tell you more about him than any biography ever could. E. V. Lucas sounds too stately to include my favorite passage from Lamb: "Buz, buz, buz, bum, bum, bum, wheeze, wheeze, wheeze, fen, fen, fen, tinky, tinky, tinky, cr'annch! I shall certainly come to be condemned at last. I have been drinking too much for two days running. I find my moral sense in the last stage of a consumption and my religion getting faint." You'll find that in the Letters (it's on page 244). They were the first Lamb I ever read, and I'm ashamed to say I only bought the book because I'd read elsewhere that a man named Lamb had visited his friend Leigh Hunt, in prison for libeling the Prince of Wales. While there, Lamb helped Hunt paint the ceiling of his cell sky blue with white clouds. Next they painted a rose trellis up one wall. Then, I further discovered, Lamb offered money to help Hunt's family outside the prison—though he himself was as poor as a man could be. Lamb also taught Hunt's youngest daughter to say the Lord's Prayer backward. You naturally want to learn everything you can about a man like that. That's what I love about reading: one tiny thing will interest you in a book, and that tiny thing will lead you onto another book, and another bit there will lead you onto a third book. It's geometrically progressive—all with no end in sight, and for no other reason than sheer enjoyment. The red stain on the cover that looks like blood—is blood. I got careless with my paper knife. The enclosed postcard is a reproduction of a painting of Lamb by his friend William Hazlitt. If you have time to correspond with me, could you answer several questions? Three, in fact. Why did a roast pig dinner have to be kept a secret? How could a pig cause you to begin a literary society? And, most pressing of all, what is a potato peel pie—and why is it included in your society's name?I have sub-let a flat at 23 Glebe Place, Chelsea, London S.W.3. My Oakley Street flat was bombed in 1945 and I still miss it. Oakley Street was wonderful—I could see the Thames out of three of my windows. I know that I am fortunate to have any place at all to live in London, but I much prefer whining to counting my blessings. I am glad you thought of me to do your Elia hunting.Yours sincerely,Juliet AshtonP.S. I never could make up my mind about Moses—it still bothers me.From Juliet to Sidney18th January, 1946Dear Sidney,This isn't a letter: it's an apology. Please forgive my moaning about the teas and luncheons you set up for Izzy. Did I call you a tyrant? I take it all back—I love Stephens & Stark for sending me out of London. Bath is a glorious town: lovely crescents of white, upstanding houses instead of London's black, gloomy buildings or—worse still—piles of rubble that were once buildings. It is bliss to breathe in clean, fresh air with no coal smoke and no dust. The weather is cold, but it isn't London's dank chill. Even the people on the street look different—upstanding, like their houses, not grey and hunched like Londoners. Susan said the guests at Abbot's book tea enjoyed themselves immensely—and I know I did. I was able to un-stick my tongue from the roof of my mouth after the first two minutes and began to have quite a good time. Susan and I are off tomorrow for bookshops in Colchester, Norwich, King's Lynn, Bradford, and Leeds.Love and thanks,JulietFrom Juliet to Sidney21st January, 1946Dear Sidney,Night-time train travel is wonderful again! No standing in the corridors for hours, no being shunted off for a troop train to pass, and above all, no black-out curtains. All the windows we passed were lighted, and I could snoop once more. I missed it so terribly during the war. I felt as if we had all turned into moles scuttling along in our separate tunnels. I don't consider myself a real peeper—they go in for bedrooms, but it's families in sitting rooms or kitchens that thrill me. I can imagine their entire lives from a glimpse of bookshelves, or desks, or lit candles, or bright sofa cushions. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • #1
  • NEW YORK TIMES
  • BESTSELLER • NOW A NETFLIX FILM • A remarkable tale of the island of Guernsey during the German Occupation, and of a society as extraordinary as its name.
  • “Treat yourself to this book, please—I can’t recommend it highly enough.”—Elizabeth Gilbert, author of
  • Eat, Pray, Love
  • “I wonder how the book got to Guernsey? Perhaps there is some sort of secret homing instinct in books that brings them to their perfect readers.”
  • January 1946: London is emerging from the shadow of the Second World War, and writer Juliet Ashton is looking for her next book subject. Who could imagine that she would find it in a letter from a man she’s never met, a native of the island of Guernsey, who has come across her name written inside a book by Charles Lamb. . . . As Juliet and her new correspondent exchange letters, Juliet is drawn into the world of this man and his friends—and what a wonderfully eccentric world it is. The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society—born as a spur-of-the-moment alibi when its members were discovered breaking curfew by the Germans occupying their island—boasts a charming, funny, deeply human cast of characters, from pig farmers to phrenologists, literature lovers all. Juliet begins a remarkable correspondence with the society’s members, learning about their island, their taste in books, and the impact the recent German occupation has had on their lives. Captivated by their stories, she sets sail for Guernsey, and what she finds will change her forever. Written with warmth and humor as a series of letters, this novel is a celebration of the written word in all its guises and of finding connection in the most surprising ways.
  • Praise for
  • The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Society
  • “A jewel . . . Poignant and keenly observed,
  • Guernsey
  • is a small masterpiece about love, war, and the immeasurable sustenance to be found in good books and good friends.”
  • People
  • “A book-lover’s delight, an implicit and sometimes explicit paean to all things literary.”
  • Chicago Sun-Times
  • “A sparkling epistolary novel radiating wit, lightly worn erudition and written with great assurance and aplomb.”
  • The Sunday Times
  • (London)
  • “Cooked perfectly à point: subtle and elegant in flavour, yet emotionally satisfying to the finish.”
  • The Times
  • (London)

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(22.3K)
★★★★
25%
(9.3K)
★★★
15%
(5.6K)
★★
7%
(2.6K)
-7%
(-2599)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Expressive, magical, and utterly remarkable, this epistolary narrative charms, penetrates, and has irresistible perspective

If this review and the promise of exquisite scenery, intelligent conversation, wry flirtations, and heartening nostalgia found within the pages of The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society won't convince you to give the book a try, I don't know what will.

Told completely in descriptive letters, amusing telegrams, and exclusive marginal notes, this modern British classic details the lives and events of post-World War II civilians, particularly in bomb-raided London and the recently liberated Channel Islands. The backdrop is extraordinarily well set, with eye-opening and little-known flashes of war terror mingled with depressing, but rich details of Guernsey's isolation under the prolonged German occupation during the war (which lasted until 1945). Both the tempestuous German reign and the brief evocations of the Belsen concentration camps are horrific, but they contrast magnificently with the gorgeous portraits of post-war Guernsey.

Dawsey Adams finds the name and address of budding war commentator and novelist, Juliet Ashton, in a book he's acquired secondhand, and seeing that the particular title--a Charles Lamb classic--is well worn, he decides to write her expressing his admiration for the author and complimenting her taste. He doesn't expect Juliet to respond--she doesn't know who he is, after all--but with her spirit and partiality towards literature, she does--enthusiastically. And thus they embark on an exciting, sparkling correspondence.

Shaffer has breathed life into her delightful, vivid cast of characters. Dawsey, Sidney, Isola, Susan, the late Elizabeth, and young Kit--I fell in love with all of them! They're simply enchanting... such a diverse, memorable group. I want to see more like them in fiction, and frankly, more like them in real life!

Juliet is so my favorite. Rebellious, lovable, and charismatic, she marches to her own drum and has a satirical approach to everything. She's the perfect blend of compassion, angst, and irony, and I absolutely loved her as well. She may, from the viewpoints of her elders, have misplaced priorities and be rather reckless with her actions, but she is fiercely stubborn--fiercely passionate--and that's what makes her such a sensational person.

When introduced to a magical literary community, Juliet is able to free her inhibitions and revel in what she knows best and devotes to the most: books. She brings out the book lover in all of us, and her engagement with the Society poignantly demonstrates the marvelous escapism of books. Guided by the wisdom of literary heros like Austen and Lamb, her and the other members' lives, once crossed, will be changed forever. This book is perfect for those who love and are awed by the power of the written word--the power it has to bring people together.

I pathetically clung on to every word; stylistically and structurally, not one sentence is out of place. With smooth narration and keen insight, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society is a delightful escape with luscious facets of history and immaculate observations that will immerses readers completely. A modern adaptation of a time-revered romance, it has the witticisms and hopeful predictability that is universally reminiscent in any era and any upbringing.

Here is a book to read again and again, and to cherish for a long time to come. It isn't just about the wonder of reading and friendship; it's about finding light in wartime, finding peace in destruction. It's about true love--true identity--and it delivers a quintessential message about humanity that we all ought to keep in mind: that in love, sometimes pride is a far, far bigger crime than prejudice.

Pros: Highly evocative in setting // Bright, endearing characters that I want to take home with me // Beautifully written, from multiple vibrant perspectives // Quaint British tone--my favorite! // Humorous // Memorable // Starry and stunningly romantic // Will appeal even to those who don't like historical novels; buoyant and chronicled, rather than dense and dull // Shrewd in emotional bearing // Heart-warming; a 100% feel-good read

Cons: The first few pages are a bit difficult to follow because you don't know who's who, but gradual character descriptions clear this up immediately // It ended!!!!

Love: "We clung to books and to our friends; they reminded us that we had another part to us."

Verdict: The miraculous effect of arts and culture, and the appreciation of literature and storytelling--and they way they both shape us humans--is luminously presented in The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society. Expressive, magical, and utterly remarkable, this epistolary narrative is, in one breath, charming with sharp penetration and irresistible perspective. In between the suppression of grief-struck war memories and slow recuperation, is a beautifully refreshing, dazzling, and hopeful reminder that in stories--on paper and in pen--people live and love on. In Juliet's own words: "The war is now the story of our lives, and there's no denying it." So too with this novel.

Rating: 10 out of 10 hearts: I'm speechless; this book is an extraordinarily amazingly wonderfully fantastically marvelous masterpiece.

Source: Complimentary copy provided by TripFiction in exchange for an honest and unbiased review (thank you!).
98 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Too cute to live

The book is almost sickeningly sweet -- with unbelievably cute characters that I could not make myself care about. But most distressing of all, it borrows heavily from the truly original style and humor of [[ASIN:1559211407 84, Charing Cross Road]] by Helene Hanff.
42 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Awful!

This is not a book that I would typically read, but it certainly has been discussed quite a bit. I gave it a shot. It was awful--incredibly trite, sanitized, completely devoid of any real human emotions. It's just a caricature of some quirky individuals who "aren't going to let those darn Nazis get them down". All of the plot devices are totally worn and obvious. All of these observations are from the first half of the book. I seriously doubt there will be any improvement in the second half of the book. Guess I'll never know, because I can't finish it. This is not a book for true lovers of great literature--at best, a "beach read".
33 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not sure what all the fuss is about

Although this was an entertaining story, ultimately it felt two dimensional and fell flat. I appreciated the research and the telling of, to me, a previously unknown chapter of World War II and it's aftermath. Having said that, I found the author's characters steriotypical and trite. Ultimately it is a light, beach read, not true literature.
26 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Embarrassingly inaccurate portrayal of a dark time

As a Guernsey girl, born and bred, I was really interested to see what this book had to offer. I was a bit apprehensive after reading the sleeve notes and realising that the authoress hadn't actually spent any time on the island - merely getting fogbound at the airport. And then I started reading the thing.... Oh dear. If you're going to set a novel somewhere, at least research the place you're setting it! Even basic details like the names of all the characters don't work - back then, most people had Guernsey French names. Moreover, they were certainly not the backward bunch of hick portrayed in this novel.
You kind of get the feeling that the writer thought that Guernsey was such an insignificant blip on the map that she could write whatever she wanted about it and nobody would really mind / care / know that what she was writing was a load of rubbish. The depressing thing is that we are a small blip on the map, and now the world is being educated about us via a load of inaccurate romanticised lies. As someone whose family lived through the Occupation, left to starve by both the British and the Germans, and resorting to living off seaweed and whatever they could harvest from the sea, this twee portrait of life under the Germans, is a rose-tinted view of what life was like.
Just bear in mind that this is a work of fiction, and a poorly written one at that, and you're welcome to enjoy its limited appeal. However, if you're looking for an accurate view of Island Life under the Nazi Occupation, then look elsewhere.
24 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Hits a jarringly wrong note

I'm interested in the wartime history of the Channel Islands and had this book highly recommended by a friend, so I really wanted to like it. Alas, I couldn't get past the first few pages because Juliet's voice seemed so patently wrong for the time and place--falsely perky, quirky, and girlish. She comes across as the product of a sentimental American writer's imagination (a Julie Andrews figure), not a product of Britain before and during the war. Perhaps the author developed a character that she grew so fond of that she didn't ever ask herself whether the character really fitted the setting.

And maybe the book gets better and more complex later on, but I was too queasy to stick around and find out.
24 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Page 22

I'm at page 22 and can't bear to read any further. The big turn-off is the "voice" which, in no way, reflects the writing style of the era. So far, it's a disjointed, concoction of scribbled gossip. I always finish a book, but not this one!
22 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Don't understand why this is so popular

I was really looking forward to reading this book, after hearing all the rave reviews. Plus I love books about wartime Britain and especially, books about books. I was hoping for a fictional "84 Charing Cross Road." But I found this book to be exceptionally dull and trite with very wooden characters. The authors were trying to have them sound like chipper PG Wodehouse types, but they were unsuccessful. Even though there are many different letter writers, which was confusing enough, all of them wrote with the same voice. They were all very glib, even the "simple Guernsey folk." I gather it was supposed to be amusing, but the story came across as silly. I just didn't care about any of these characters or the "hilarious" stories they were telling. I almost didn't finish it, but I had to read it for my book group. Very disappointing.
21 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Just Like My Momma's Pie

Just Like My Momma's Pie

Overall, I like my mother's cooking. She's gotten more creative over the years, and eating what she's prepared gives me a nice, homey feeling. However, I've always been a bit hesitant about my mother's desserts, particularly her pies. They always come out far too sweet for my taste, because she adds lots of sugar to berries that are already naturally sweet.

This book is a lot like my mother's pie. It looks pretty, the crust is warm and flaky, but one bite and the filling sends you into a diabetic coma.

Juliet Ashton is an English authoress extraordinaire with writer's block. Through some crazy circumstances (one of her sold books gets into the hands of pig farmer, Dawsey), she gets in contact with the citizens of Gurnsey, an island in the English Channel--particularly the citizens in the Gurnsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society and learns how they formed and survived the war.

I am not opposed to charming, quirky, upbeat books set in small, agrarian towns with lots of charming, cute, quirky characters. I grew up reading Anne of Green Gables, Laura Ingalls Wilder, and others. But this book isn't like the others I mentioned. Instead of feeling like a quirky town, I feel like I am forced into a manufactured artificial sugar mill, having my emotions purposefully tweaked and pulled to suit the authors' whims.

The characters are all incredibly flat, boring, and one dimensional. Our protagonist, Juliet, is flaming Mary Sue Number 1. I had to suffer through so many over-the-top descriptions of how charming, upbeat, perky, spunky, free-willed, and feminist she is, I was gagging and crying for something salty. Everyone loves her; she is perfect at everything; she immediately makes friends with everyone; those she doesn't immediately befriend end up being bad, bad, horrible people who all get their come-uppance in the end. In no way is Juliet a real character; she has absolutely no flaws whatsoever.

But worse than Juliet is Flaming Mary Sue 2: Elizabeth. Everything that goddamn woman did was worshipped by the all the "good" people. She was only a servant girl, but OF COURSE, she could do whatever she wanted, slap people around, sleep around, have an illegitimate child, sleep with a German, defy authorities, and be superwoman in FRAKKIN' everything and everyone STILL loves her and worships her and is SO UPSET that she is gone. This woman, more than anyone else in the ENTIRE cast, drove me up the wall bonkers, and I HATED each and every time she was drug into the story (which was CONSTANTLY).

The rest of the cast is rounded out with more flaming stereotypes or boring, one dimensional characters. We have our ONE AND ONLY GERMAN who is a good guy and can feel pain (because, as we all know, ALL GERMANS in the Nazi army cannot feel pain). We have our American @sshole who tries to bully our spunky heroine into marriage. We have our quriky witch wannabe, who LOVES "Wuthering Heights". We have our self-righteous prude, who is bad because she doesn't worship the beloved Goddess, Elizabeth and is okay to pick on to people you barely know because she's EVIL. We have lots of charming farmers, who are somehow ALL trained in reading and comprehending this classical literature and they LIKE IT. We have CUTE CHILDREN, who are wise beyond their years and OH SO CHARMING to everyone and IMMEDIATELY get all adults to fall in love with them (GAG ME!!). Oh, and we even have a homosexual just to show how TOLERANT this 1940's crowd is. There is no one in this entire cast that bears a modicum of resemblance to real people.

The letter writing is gimmicky. Around 90% of the letters sounds like they are written by the exact same person (which, in a sense, they were: the author). The only ones I could tolerate were the ones written by the lady who read the cookbook (now THAT was brilliance! I absolutely adored her devotion and love for cooking and her comparisons to reading) and one or two farmers that ACTUALLY sounded like they were farmers, with imperfect grammar and regional cadences. Not to mention, I was often confused reading these letters. Apparently, not all letters were related in this novel, as Sidney doesn't respond to Juliet near enough and some of Juliet's replies indicate she's received letters or sent letters we don't read. And also, the dates on the letters were COMPLETELY Bogus. Juliet is complaining a month after Sidney has broken his leg about his injury? Broken legs take MONTHS to heal. Juliet can send and receive letters from Australia in TWO WEEKS?! WOW, that mail delivery service is, in some ways, better than NOW. Juliet is going to Gurnsey after knowing about these people for a mere few months? Mark is pushing for marriage after barely knowing Juliet 4 months? I call foul. These aren't the actions of people in the 1940's; these are the actions of people in the present day.

The actual plot is almost non-existent. This isn't necessarily a bad thing; Anne of Green Gables didn't have a plot, per say, and was more a character novel. The problem with this book was the character growth was poor or non-existent and the events and revelations were almost bland. We know almost from the onset that Juliet won't be with Mark; her Romantic Plot Triangle was unnecessary to the T. Otherwise, Juliet doesn't change at all, and neither do any of the other characters--they are all as perfect and wonderful as they started out being. By this time, there have been so many books and movies and memoirs about the atrocities of World War II and the Third Reich, I almost say we are immune to it and nothing this book say about this time period is likely to knock us out. Concentration camps? Yup, Corrie Ten Boom. Hiding Jews? Yup, Anne Frank. German Occupation? Yup, pick, your WWII medium. If anything, the book comes out weak on these areas.

And, by the way, why are people in 1946 so keen on writing books about the experience in WWII? Do people really come out of a war and want to write memoirs and books about how people got out of a war? Don't they usually wait like 20 years before they write their tome? I don't know, it just felt odd to me.

I don't want to sound like I hated this or I found this to be the worst book ever. As I said above, there were a few letters that truly did sound unique. I loved the letter from the cookbook lady (I can't remember her name, she only wrote one letter). I also found that this novel made me aware of A) an island that I didn't realize existed, and B) the reactions of people to events that have become almost overdone in modern times. Also, the writing was fairly easy to read, the pace quick, and the story short.

Maybe I wasn't in the mood for something so light and frothy. Maybe I am tired of reading about WWII. I don't know, but this book was tiresome to get through, and I nearly got cavities from all the sugar in these pages. Perhaps if you want to read a lighter take on WWII, this would be a good book for you. As for me, I need to get to the dentist to fill in these cavities and switch to some ruffage.

Brought to you by:
*C.S. Light*
21 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Could have been much better

I was so disappointed with a book that has 4.5 stars here. The story was nice enough, and the idea of telling the story in the form of letters was interesting. However, the story itself was far too predictable, and the letters from different people were written with the same voice. This book does not deserve the star rating that it has.
20 people found this helpful