The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions
The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions book cover

The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions

Paperback – April 10, 2007

Price
$17.99
Format
Paperback
Pages
592
Publisher
Anchor
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385721240
Dimensions
5.27 x 1 x 7.93 inches
Weight
14.8 ounces

Description

“A splendid book. . . . Lucid, highly readable. . . . Relevant to a world still embroiled in military conflict and sectarian hatreds.” — The New York Times “Masterful. . . . Stimulating. . . . A tour de force.”— The Christian Science Monitor “ The Great Transformation is Armstrong at her best—translating and distilling complex history into lucid prose. . . . Her call to rededicate our religious selves to compassion, other-directed love and service is downright rousing.” — The Washington Post “Remarkable and persuasive.” — The Independent “Perhaps her most ambitious work to date. . . . Thoroughly researched and readable.” — The San Francisco Chronicle KAREN ARMSTRONG is the author of numerous books on religion, including The Case for God, A History of God, The Battle for God, Holy War, Islam, Buddha , and Fields of Bloos , as well as a memoir, The Spiral Staircase . Her work has been translated into forty-five languages. In 2008 she was awarded the TED Prize and began working with TED on the Charter for Compassion, created online by the general public, crafted by leading thinkers in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism. It was launched globally in the fall of 2009. Also in 2008, she was awarded the Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Medal. In 2013, she received the British Academy’s inaugural Nayef Al-Rodhanxa0Prize for Transcultural Understanding. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. ASRATHE AXIAL PEOPLES (c. 1600 to 900 BCE)The first people to attempt an Axial Age spirituality were pastoralists living on the steppes of southern Russia, who called themselves the Aryans. The Aryans were not a distinct ethnic group, so this was not a racial term but an assertion of pride and meant something like “noble” or “honorable.” The Aryans were a loose-knit network of tribes who shared a common culture. Because they spoke a language that would form the basis of several Asiatic and European tongues, they are also called Indo-Europeans. They had lived on the Caucasian steppes since about 4500, but by the middle of the third millennium some tribes began to roam farther and farther afield, until they reached what is now Greece, Italy, Scandinavia, and Germany. At the same time, those Aryans who had remained behind on the steppes gradually drifted apart and became two separate peoples, speaking different forms of the original Indo-European. One used the Avestan dialect, the other an early form of Sanskrit. They were able to maintain contact, however, because at this stage their languages were still very similar, and until about 1500 they continued to live peacefully together, sharing the same cultural and religious traditions.It was a quiet, sedentary existence. The Aryans could not travel far, because the horse had not yet been domesticated, so their horizons were bounded by the steppes. They farmed their land, herded their sheep, goats, and pigs, and valued stability and continuity. They were not a warlike people, since, apart from a few skirmishes with one another or with rival groups, they had no enemies and no ambition to conquer new territory. Their religion was simple and peaceful. Like other ancient peoples, the Aryans experienced an invisible force within themselves and in everything that they saw, heard, and touched. Storms, winds, trees, and rivers were not impersonal, mindless phenomena. The Aryans felt an affinity with them, and revered them as divine. Humans, deities, animals, plants, and the forces of nature were all manifestations of the same divine “spirit,” which the Avestans called mainyu and the Sanskrit-speakers manya . It animated, sustained, and bound them all together.Over time the Aryans developed a more formal pantheon. At a very early stage, they had worshiped a Sky God called Dyaus Pitr, creator of the world. But like other High Gods, Dyaus was so remote that he was eventually replaced by more accessible gods, who were wholly identified with natural and cosmic forces. Varuna preserved the order of the universe; Mithra was the god of storm, thunder, and life-giving rain; Mazda, lord of justice and wisdom, was linked with the sun and stars; and Indra, a divine warrior, had fought a three-headed dragon called Vritra and brought order out of chaos. Fire, which was crucial to civilized society, was also a god and the Aryans called him Agni. Agni was not simply the divine patron of fire; he was the fire that burned in every single hearth. Even the hallucinogenic plant that inspired the Aryan poets was a god, called Haoma in Avestan and Soma in Sanskrit: he was a divine priest who protected the people from famine and looked after their cattle.The Avestan Aryans called their gods daevas (“the shining ones”) and amesha (“the immortals”). In Sanskrit these terms became devas and amrita . None of these divine beings, however, were what we usually call “gods” today. They were not omnipotent and had no ultimate control over the cosmos. Like human beings and all the natural forces, they had to submit to the sacred order that held the universe together. Thanks to this order, the seasons succeeded one another in due course, the rain fell at the right times, and the crops grew each year in the appointed month. The Avestan Aryans called this order asha , while the Sanskrit-speakers called it rita . It made life possible, keeping everything in its proper place and defining what was true and correct.Human society also depended upon this sacred order. People had to make firm, binding agreements about grazing rights, the herding of cattle, marriage, and the exchange of goods. Translated into social terms, asha / rita meant loyalty, truth, and respect, the ideals embodied by Varuna, the guardian of order, and Mithra, his assistant. These gods supervised all covenant agreements that were sealed by a solemn oath. The Aryans took the spoken word very seriously. Like all other phenomena, speech was a god, a deva . Aryan religion was not very visual. As far as we know, the Aryans did not make effigies of their gods. Instead, they found that the act of listening brought them close to the sacred. Quite apart from its meaning, the very sound of a chant was holy; even a single syllable could encapsulate the divine. Similarly, a vow, once uttered, was eternally binding, and a lie was absolutely evil because it perverted the holy power inherent in the spoken word. The Aryans would never lose this passion for absolute truthfulness.Every day, the Aryans offered sacrifices to their gods to replenish the energies they expended in maintaining world order. Some of these rites were very simple. The sacrificer would throw a handful of grain, curds, or fuel into the fire to nourish Agni, or pound the stalks of soma, offer the pulp to the water goddesses, and make a sacred drink. The Aryans also sacrificed cattle. They did not grow enough crops for their needs, so killing was a tragic necessity, but the Aryans ate only meat that had been ritually and humanely slaughtered. When a beast was ceremonially given to the gods, its spirit was not extinguished but returned to Geush Urvan (“Soul of the Bull”), the archetypical domestic animal. The Aryans felt very close to their cattle. It was sinful to eat the flesh of a beast that had not been consecrated in this way, because profane slaughter destroyed it forever, and thus violated the sacred life that made all creatures kin. Again, the Aryans would never entirely lose this profound respect for the “spirit” that they shared with others, and this would become a crucial principle of their Axial Age.To take the life of any being was a fearful act, not to be undertaken lightly, and the sacrificial ritual compelled the Aryans to confront this harsh law of existence. The sacrifice became and would remain the organizing symbol of their culture, by which they explained the world and their society. The Aryans believed that the universe itself had originated in a sacrificial offering. In the beginning, it was said, the gods, working in obedience to the divine order, had brought forth the world in seven stages. First they created the Sky , which was made of stone like a huge round shell; then the Earth , which rested like a flat dish upon the Water that had collected in the base of the shell. In the center of the Earth, the gods placed three living creatures: a Plant , a Bull , and a Man . Finally they produced Agni, the Fire . But at first everything was static and lifeless. It was not until the gods performed a triple sacrifice—crushing the Plant, and killing the Bull and the Man—that the world became animated. The sun began to move across the sky, seasonal change was established, and the three sacrificial victims brought forth their own kind. Flowers, crops, and trees sprouted from the pulped Plant; animals sprang from the corpse of the Bull; and the carcass of the first Man gave birth to the human race. The Aryans would always see sacrifice as creative. By reflecting on this ritual, they realized that their lives depended upon the death of other creatures. The three archetypal creatures had laid down their lives so that others might live. There could be no progress, materially or spiritually, without self-sacrifice. This too would become one of the principles of the Axial Age.The Aryans had no elaborate shrines and temples. Sacrifice was offered in the open air on a small, level piece of land, marked off from the rest of the settlement by a furrow. The seven original creations were all symbolically represented in this arena: Earth in the soil, Water in the vessels, Fire in the hearth; the stone Sky was present in the flint knife, the Plant in the crushed soma stalks, the Bull in the victim, and the first Man in the priest. And the gods, it was thought, were also present. The hotr priest, expert in the liturgical chant, would sing a hymn to summon devas to the feast. When they had entered the sacred arena, the gods sat down on the freshly mown grass strewn around the altar to listen to these hymns of praise. Since the sound of these inspired syllables was itself a god, as the song filled the air and entered their consciousness, the congregation felt surrounded by and infused with divinity. Finally the primordial sacrifice was repeated. The cattle were slain, the soma pressed, and the priest laid the choicest portions of the victims onto the fire, so that Agni could convey them to the land of the gods. The ceremony ended with a holy communion, as priest and participants shared a festal meal with the deities, eating the consecrated meat and drinking the intoxicating soma, which seemed to lift them to another dimension of being.The sacrifice brought practical benefits too. It was commissioned by a member of the community, who hoped that those devas who had responded to his invitation and attended the sacrifice would help him in the future. Like any act of hospitality, the ritual placed an obligation on the divinities to respond in kind, and the hotr often reminded them to protect the patron’s family, crops, and herd. The sacrifice also enhanced the patron’s standing in the community. Like the gods, his human guests were now in his debt, and by providing the cattle for the feast and giving the officiating priests a handsome gift, he had demonstrated that he was a man of substance. The benefits of religion were purely material and this-worldly. People wanted the gods to provide them with cattle, wealth, and security. At first the Aryans had entertained no hope of an afterlife, but by the end of the second millennium, some were beginning to believe that wealthy people who had commissioned a lot of sacrifices would be able to join the gods in paradise after their death.This slow, uneventful life came to an end when the Aryans discovered modern technology. In about 1500, they had begun to trade with the more advanced societies south of the Caucasus in Mesopotamia and Armenia. They learned about bronze weaponry from the Armenians and also discovered new methods of transport: first they acquired wooden carts pulled by oxen, and then the war chariot. Once they had learned how to tame the wild horses of the steppes and harness them to their chariots, they discovered the joys of mobility. Life would never be the same again. The Aryans had become warriors. They could now travel long distances at high speed. With their superior weapons, they could conduct lightning raids on neighboring settlements and steal cattle and crops. This was far more thrilling and lucrative than stock breeding. Some of the younger men served as mercenaries in the armies of the southern kingdoms, and became expert in chariot warfare. When they returned to the steppes, they put their new skills to use and started to rustle their neighbors’ cattle. They killed, plundered, and pillaged, terrorizing the more conservative Aryans, who were bewildered, frightened, and entirely disoriented, feeling that their lives had been turned upside down.Violence escalated on the steppes as never before. Even the more traditional tribes, who simply wanted to be left alone, had to learn the new military techniques in order to defend themselves. A heroic age had be-gun. Might was right; chieftains sought gain and glory; and bards celebrated aggression, reckless courage, and military prowess. The old Aryan religion had preached reciprocity, self-sacrifice, and kindness to animals. This was no longer appealing to the cattle rustlers, whose hero was the dynamic Indra, the dragon slayer, who rode in a chariot upon the clouds of heaven. Indra was now the divine model to whom the raiders aspired. “Heroes with noble horses, fain for battle, selected warriors call on me in combat,” he cried. “I, bountiful Indra, excite the conflict, I stir the dust, Lord of surpassing vigour!” When they fought, killed, and robbed, the Aryan cowboys felt themselves one with Indra and the aggressive devas who had established the world order by force of arms.But the more traditional, Avestan-speaking Aryans were appalled by Indra’s naked aggression, and began to have doubts about the daevas . Were they all violent and immoral? Events on earth always reflected cosmic events in heaven, so, they reasoned, these terrifying raids must have a divine prototype. The cattle rustlers, who fought under the banner of Indra, must be his earthly counterparts. But who were the daevas attacking in heaven? The most important gods—such as Varuna, Mazda, and Mithra, the guardians of orderwere given the honorific title “Lord” (ahura). Perhaps the peaceful ahuras, who stood for justice, truth, and respect for life and property, were themselves under attack by Indra and the more aggressive daevas? This, at any rate, was the view of a visionary priest, who in about 1200 claimed that Ahura Mazda had commissioned him to restore order to the steppes. His name was Zoroaster.When he received his divine vocation, the new prophet was about thirty years old and strongly rooted in the Aryan faith. He had probably studied for the priesthood since he was seven years old, and was so steeped in tradition that he could improvise sacred chants to the gods during the sacrifice. But Zoroaster was deeply disturbed by the cattle raids, and after completing his education, he had spent some time in consultation with other priests, and had meditated on the rituals to find a solution to the problem. One morning, while he was celebrating the spring festival, Zoroaster had risen at dawn and walked down to the river to collect water for the daily sacrifice. Wading in, he immersed himself in the pure element, and when he emerged, saw a shining being standing on the riv-erbank, who told Zoroaster that his name was Vohu Manah (“Good Purpose”). Once he had been assured of Zoroaster’s own good intentions, he led him into the presence of the greatest of the ahuras: Mazda, lord of wisdom and justice, who was surrounded by his retinue of seven radiant gods. He told Zoroaster to mobilize his people in a holy war against terror and violence. The story is bright with the promise of a new beginning. A fresh era had dawned: everybody had to make a decision, gods and humans alike. Were they on the side of order or evil? Read more

Features & Highlights

  • NATIONAL BESTSELLER • A
  • n extraordinary investigation of a critical moment in the evolution of religious thought
  • —from the
  • New York Times
  • bestselling author of
  • A History of God
  • and
  • The Spiral Staircase
  • “A splendid book.... Lucid, highly readable.... Relevant to a world still embroiled in military conflict and sectarian hatreds.” —
  • The New York Times
  • In the ninth century BCE, events in four regions of the civilized world led to the rise of religious traditions that have endured to the present day—development of Confucianism and Daoism in China, Hinduism and Buddhism in India, monotheism in Israel, and philosophical rationalism in Greece. Armstrong, one of our most prominent religious scholars, examines how these traditions began in response to the violence of their time. Studying figures as diverse as the Buddha and Socrates, Confucius and Jeremiah, Armstrong reveals how these still enduring philosophies can help address our contemporary problems.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(214)
★★★★
25%
(89)
★★★
15%
(54)
★★
7%
(25)
-7%
(-25)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

A must read book!

I really loved this book, and it is a must in any serious library.

This is a book to read and reread several times in order to really understand the roots of the religions of the world. Why did prophets come to our aid? Who are prophets in the first place? Are philosophers like Plato and Aristotle prophets? What about Confucius and the Buddha, are they prophets? Who determines who is a prophet and who is not? And when it comes to prophets, who is right and who is wrong?

Not all prophets preached the same message, and not all teachings spanned the test of time. Buddha, for example, did not believe in a monotheistic God. The Greeks believed in many gods. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, on the other hand, believe in one God, though they call Him by different names. The earliest Greek religions rewarded warriors for indiscriminate conquests, while latter religions like Christianity and Islam forbade unprovoked wars and conquests. Some prophets, like Jesus for example, preached to leave all worldly possessions and ambitions behind and follow him to the way of God. Buddha too left his newlywed bride and his newly born child to search for enlightenment, and together with his followers begged for food and lived almost naked during their entire spiritual journey. Islam and Judaism, on the other hand, place great importance on family life and one's role in society. Abandoning one's family is condoned in both Judaism and Islam.

Is there such a thing as a right and a wrong religion? And which religion should one follow? Should one choose his religion or is religion chosen for a person at birth?

This is a really fascinating book that will leave you bombarded with many questions. Karen Armstrong shows how all religions differ in their roots and motivation, yet in a subtle way are very similar. You will learn of many early religions such as Zoroastrianism.

Zoroastrianism is the religion and philosophy based on the teachings ascribed to the prophet Zoroaster (also known as Zarathustra or Zartosht). I mentioned here because some scholars have suggested that Zoroastrianism was where the first prophet of a monotheistic faith arose. It is probably the oldest of the revealed creedal religions. Scholars believe that Zoroastrianism had more influence on mankind both directly and indirectly than any other faith. It was once the dominant religion of much of Iran. As of 2007 the faith has dwindled to small numbers; some sources suggest that it is practiced by fewer than 200,000 worldwide, with its largest centers in India and Iran.

One thing is common to all religions and spiritual movements: they all sprang from social unrest and injustice during a period known as the axial age. In case you are wondering what the "axial age" is, the philosopher Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) first originated the term in his book entitled The Origin and Goal of History (published in 1949): " ... In the years centering around 500 B.C. -- from 800 to 200 -- the spiritual foundations of humanity were laid simultaneously and independently in China, India, Persia, Palestine and Greece. And these are the foundations upon which humanity still subsists today."

This book is easy to read and a pleasure to devour. I highly recommend it! But be forewarned: you will never look at your religion the same way again!
18 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not What I Was Hoping For

I really, really wanted to like this book. Its premise is compelling; during the so-called "Axial Age"--that is, from 1600 to 900 BC--world events led to the rise of four great religious traditions: the development of Confucianism and Daoism in China, Hinduism and Buddhism in India, monotheism in Israel, and philosophical rationalism in Greece. Earlier beliefs that the gods (plural) were to be worshipped for their ability to bring bounty to a particular people or to assist them in territorial warfare evolved to the point where other-directed love and service, empathy, and compassion became the most important considerations. Because this is my own personal ethos, I was interested to understand the historical context that gave birth to such thinking. But Armstrong is a religious scholar; in her quest for comprehensive accuracy, she bogs down in too many details that are irrelevant to the lay reader. (A psychologist might call her obsessive-compulsive or at least note that she would be an "over-incorporator" in Rorschach terms.) A Reader's Digest condensed version of this tome would have been welcome. But I became stuck around page 274, unable to trudge through the next 200 pages to the end. Pity, as I was just starting to get to the good stuff. But her accounting of too many tribal migrations and temple desecrations had killed off my interest by then.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Origin of Religious Thought

This book by a recognized authority on religion traces evolution of religious thought over the last three thousand years. It covers the development of the three main religious schools of today: Indo-Arian, Judeo-Christian-Islamic and Far Eastern. Thoroughly researched with extensive annotation and refernces, it manages to condense extensive knowledge in 500 pages. A must for those interested in understanding evolution of religion.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Prophetic in the K Jaspers sense

Seminal and grounded - a master work that all leaders and pedestrians like the rest of us should read to lead a better fuller life leading to peace of mind and achievement of a complete understanding of our self.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A good but long read.

This book is definitely worth reading for anyone interested in how mankind developed our religious/moral belief systems. She writes well and tries to combine a wide range of historical ethical trends under one umbrella theme. Originally a devout Catholic, then non-believer, now a "freelance monotheists" Karen provides a nice objective overview of how four great societies came to find the Golden rule (do unto others as you would want done to you) independently during the axial age. Some interesting topics are how Judaism came to believe in only one god when gods were a dime a dozen. And how the Buddha thought organized religions were a form of collective egotism, and that we should focus on this world and not the afterlife. While 99% of the book deals with religions and Greek logic before JC and Muhammad appeared, it does give a nice perspective on these two recent religions towards the end. Some consider religion a raft used to cross a river to a land of higher moral and spiritual enlightenment. The question is, when you reach that land, do you carry that raft on your back. Or, do you let it go and take another path in your journey through life. Note that the book is a long read and not a page turner.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A mountain or a cloud?

Some reviewers call this book "magisterial." It is vast in design and intricate in detail. It fills the horizon like a mountain -- or like a cloud? Like a whale or it is very like a weazel?

That is the question that I ask, having listened to about eighty percent of the book in Armstrong's voice. Armstrong is fond of bifucating "mythos" and "logos;" can one call a vast and detailed myth "magisterial," or need that adjective be fixed to something unmoving and solid? I found the book erudite and insightful. Armstrong almost always seems to know very well what happened, despite all the odds.

What sometimes gives me pause . . .

First, Armstrong's own mythos seems to intrude upon her story and shape it, with pieces lopped off or added on to a Proscrustean creation. Times don't quite match: well make them match. Ethics are really rather different between the Greeks, the Chinese, and the Indians: well lets patch them together somehow.

The strangest patchwork job is Armstrong's determination to bring Mohammed into the story as the "last flower" of the Axial Age. This is strange because the man mass-murdered, tortured, raped, enslaved, invaded, and generally made a not very fragrant petunia; also because he lived a thousand years after the period Armstrong covers. Yet having read some of her other books, one knows Mohammed will be brought in, as sure as you'll find Wally somewhere in the picture.

Who knows how much of this book is pure mythos and how much tells something that once happened? I've been studying world religion for decades, and I'm not sure. I kinda sorta doubt anyone knows the pre-Vedic Aryans as well as Armstrong thinks she does, for instance, though have no expertise in the period.

The cultures I know best here are Chinese, and a bit about Hebrew and Greek. Seemed to me her discussion of them were mostly pretty good, though I suspect she's offering some iffy theories with the Hebrews. Her pronunciation of Chinese names is painful to listen to, read with such assurance, too -- couldn't she ask a Chinese for some sort of clue how to pronounce these words? That made me wonder about her equally brisk reading of Sanskrit and Hebrew, not to mention her facts.

My final complaint is the lack of humor. We are not amused. How can one write about Zhuang Zi without a twinkle in one's eye? It's as if she had the word "magisterial" in her own mind, and srove to live up to it. Narry a certifiable joke and barely a hint of taking herself less than seriously -- for this reason, and the bad Chinese pronunciation, I advise you to READ, not listen to the tape.

Yet there is a majesty here too. Armstrong is a fluent story-teller. The ages of man rise up before one, whether solid rock or ephemeral intellectul haze, or some combination of the two. It's a worthwhile sight. Don't assume all you see will remain as the sun continues to rise and interrogates the landscape more thoroughly; but it is a prospect worth this vision, a first glimpse of human progress and some of the most magnificent human words and sentiments ever written -- a wisdom that, I agree with Armstrong (though for me it does come down to Jesus) remains, and that we still have long indeed to live up to.

Take Isaiah, Confucius, Lao Zi, Socrates, Epictetus, Buddha at his best, as teachers. They live on to instruct us, not merely to adorn our maps of a past intellectual world. Armstrong takes them seriously enough that her account is worth reading.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Life Changing Experience

The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions by Karen Armstrong is about the development of religion from 500 B.C.E. to about 500 C.E. (Common Era). She treats all religion with reverence and explains so much that I never before understood. Armstrong is a dazzling intellectual virtuoso, but writes so that anyone would find it interesting and enlightening.

I tend to treat all organized religions with contempt. They seem to me to be about money and power over people. She manages to explain the other side. When I was a monk the Church lied to me about so many things for its own benefit, I was angry. Armstrong puts religion -- a human institution -- into an entirely different light and shows the common thread of universal love, acceptance and compassion that runs through most religions and philosophies. She gives a global comprehensive view of each belief philosophy and movement.

This is the best non-fiction book I've read since I read "A World Lit Only by Fire: The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance: Portrait of an Age" 20 years ago. This book also changed my life more than any book since "Life After Life: The Investigation of a Phenomenon--Survival of Bodily Death" which I read 40 years ago.

WARNING: This book is likely to change your thinking and your life. If you don't have time to read the entire book, read the last chapter which summarizes the transcendent themes. After that you'll find time to read the entire book.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Classic in Comparative Religions; Applicable to Life

I sent for Karen Armstrong's book, The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions, because it was assigned as the primary text for a graduate course that I'm taking. I have successfully taken about thirty graduate courses (courses---not credits) over the years, and I have become quite adept at differentiating scholarly books that are simply putting on obtuse airs and those that are seminal works.
This is a seminal, original work that is accessible, enjoyable, and life-helpful on all levels. One does not need to be a graduate student to grasp the breadth and depth of Armstrong's clearly-presented perspective. It is a well-organized mix of history and philosophical analysis. The author does not try to impose her ideas on us; her work is a catalyst.
Do a search for "Karen Armstrong's acceptance speech upon receiving the Ted Prize" to see and hear her impassioned but rational views. The book that I've reviewed above runs about five hundred pages. Essentially, it is about the surfacing of the Golden Rule in far-separated cultures and religions within a few centuries... why it appeared then and why it is relevant for today. Stay away if you don't like history.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Intruiging exploration of our religious past

Karen Armstrong, a commentator and historian of the world's religions, adds to her writings another interesting exploration of the roots and origins of the world's faiths. In this study, Armstrong in particular examines the crucial period originally called the 'Axial Age' by the existentialist thinker and theologian Karl Jaspers, though updated to reflect the new findings by historians and archeaologists about the origins of the world's major faiths. Armstrong examines the founders of the Semitic, Chinese, Greek and Indian religions and their underlying current of the need to curtail and restrain violence and develop the emotional capacity for compassion for the other, in the face of the often great brutality that plagued the world in that time period.

Armstrong ends by arguing the message of the founders of the world's religious traditions still have relevance today, particularly in the disturbing trends of increasing selfishness, violence and greed that seem to mark a globalised, capitalist world. While the apocalyptic tone of some of Armstrong's fears go a bit over the top, I think her careful scholarship does tell us something important about the origins of religions and the role they have to play in our emotional life.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Data overload.

Here you will find the history, philosophy, and religion of China, India, Greece and the Hebrew people in the millennium preceding the New Era, plus a little information on Christianity and Islam, all packed in 480 pages. There is no doubt that Ms. Armstrong is very knowledgeable; as I also would be now, if I could only remember all this stuff. It is not only the density of the matter that makes it hard reading, but also all the Chinese and Indian names of people, creeds, and philosophies. Most of them are unpronounceable, yet you are supposed to remember them because, after introducing them, the author uses them when explaining later points. Like when she applies the Indian word brahmodya (which sounds very Greek) to describe what the concept of the Christian Trinity is supposed to accomplish.

Ms. Armstrong argues in her book that in these four geographic areas the great philosophies dealing with people's compassionate behavior towards each other (the Golden Rule) first came to prominence and then fell again into disfavor at, roughly, the same time. She traces this history of rise and fall by dividing the entire time period in approximately 100-year segments and covering the events that took place in each locality during that time segment. But, although jumping from area to area during the description helps make comparisons, it does make it harder for the reader to keep track of the serial evolution of each philosophy, not to mention remembering the nomenclature.

All in all, this book presents excellent information; but it is not an easy read, and you may have to do some backtracking every now and then to refresh your memory.

(The writer is the author of "Christianity without Fairy Tales: When Science and Religion Merge," and of the forthcoming, "The Way of the Butterfly: A Scientific Speculation on God and the Hereafter.")
3 people found this helpful