The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry
The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry book cover

The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry

Hardcover – December 10, 2019

Price
$47.99
Format
Hardcover
Pages
264
Publisher
IVP Academic
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0830852635
Dimensions
6.25 x 0.75 x 9 inches
Weight
39.5 pounds

Description

"This book would be fascinating for its scientific content alone, establishing the surprisingly high probability of all human beings alive having common ancestral parents akin to the biblical Adam and Eve. But it also offers biblical, theological, and philosophical subtlety and precision, all saturated with hermeneutical charity on questions too often marked by polemics and hostility. It takes the reader on an intellectual adventure and reanimates our pursuit of one of the most profound human questions: Can sacred and natural history combine to tell us something essential about who we are and why we are here? I believe we are at an inflection point where the scientific plausibility of the core convictions of biblical faith is increasing after centuries of skepticism. This book may well be remembered as one of the turning points in that story." -- Andy Crouch, author of Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling "As a secular scientist, I was seriously skeptical of this book. Nevertheless, Swamidass has ably shown that the current evidence in genetics and ancestry is compatible with a recently de novo –created couple as among our universal common ancestors who then interbred with the rest of humanity that descended through the established evolutionary processes. In doing so, Swamidass aims to bridge a centuries-old divide between faith and science. In a world at war with itself, the need for such common ground is most urgent." -- Nathan H. Lents, professor of biology, John Jay College, CUNY, and author of Human Errors "I am one of the many scientists who have maintained that the existence of Adam and Eve as ancestors of all people on earth is incompatible with the scientific data. In this book, Joshua Swamidass effectively demonstrates that people like me, stuck in a specific genetic paradigm, were wrong. Ironically, I first learned the key calculation from Richard Dawkins, who wrote fifteen years ago in The Ancestor's Tale , 'I don't know about you, but I find these dates [for the last common ancestor] astonishingly recent.' I failed to appreciate the biblical ramifications of this fact. In writing this book, Swamidass removes our blinders. In a clearly written and highly accessible style, he shows how a traditional understanding of the Genesis narrative, including the sudden creation of Adam and Eve, is fully compatible with science. Creation through the evolutionary process is still central to the story, but the existence of two individuals―ancestors of us all―is now freed from what seemed like scientific inconsistency and placed, once again, purely into the realm of theology where it belongs." -- Darrel R. Falk, professor of biology emeritus, Point Loma Nazarene University "In Judaism there is a blessing for almost everything. There is a blessing one should say upon encountering a religious scholar and a different blessing for encountering a secular scholar, as both types of scholarship are valued. In this book Dr. S. Joshua Swamidass earns both blessings. Dr. Swamidass is a scientist by profession and a devout Christian who thinks deeply about theological questions. He uses cutting-edge theory from population genetics concerning the difference between genealogical ancestors versus genetic ancestors (a small subset of the former) and applies it accurately and with rigorous scientific logic to the theological issues surrounding the biblical account of Adam and Eve. Many theological issues arise from Adam and Eve, such as race and racism, and Dr. Swamidass approaches these issues in a manner that values and incorporates both science and religion. Books dealing with science and religion often emphasize conflicts while others present them as non-overlapping methods of knowledge that are largely irrelevant to one another. Dr. Swamidass shows in this book how science and religion are both valuable methods of scholarship that can display a positive synergism in which neither discipline has to retreat from its fundamental principles in order to deepen our insight into the science/religion interface. Both scientists and people of faith should read this book to learn that conflict and irrelevancy are not the only ways in which science and religion can interact." -- Alan R. Templeton, Charles Rebstock Professor Emeritus of Biology and Statistical Genomics, Washington University in St. Louis, and Institute of Evolution and Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Israel "This is one of those rare books that changes the conversation. With equal parts candor, humility, passion, and precision, Swamidass engages an incredibly controversial topic at the junction of biology and theology: the origin of human beings. Through the effective use of two key distinctions―the difference between genealogical and genetic ancestry, and the multiple meanings of 'human' across divergent areas of inquiry―he reorients and expands the space of possibilities while maintaining faithfulness and rigor with respect to traditional exegesis and contemporary scientific knowledge. The book's primary virtue is not that it offers the strongest version of a particular position or provides answers to every question. Instead, its strength lies in how Swamidass demonstrates that there is more to talk about in conceptualizing what counts as a position or an answer in the first place, and that the tenor of those conversations should be peaceful rather than fractious. A definitive achievement. Tolle lege ." -- Alan C. Love, professor of philosophy at the University of Minnesota "Swamidass proposes a genealogical Adam as a way to help resolve conflict among the competing creation and evolution models for human origins. He is to be commended for exhorting us all to 'find that better way together' to resolve our differences with patience and humility." -- Hugh Ross, president and founder of Reasons to Believe, astronomer, pastor, and author " The Genealogical Adam and Eve is a meticulously researched, fascinating, and timely book. I am personally grateful to Dr. Swamidass for his honest and thoughtful approach to the question of the historical Adam. Whether we agree or disagree with him on evolution or Adam and Eve, everyone can deeply appreciate the spirit in which he writes this book. It is a model for how to approach hard questions at the intersection of science and faith. May this book get the wide readership it deserves." -- Sean McDowell, professor of apologetics, Talbot School of Theology, Biola University "Many Christians struggle with the challenge of mainstream science, especially on human origins. This book changes the game. The focus on genetic ancestry distracted us from genealogical ancestry. Scripture does not speak of genetics, but it does emphasize genealogy, presenting Adam as the genealogical ancestor of the human race. In terms that nonscientists can understand, Swamidass shows how scientific findings in genetics are entirely compatible with this biblical claim. The Genealogical Adam and Eve is creating a new conversation about human origins, and it is essential reading for everyone at the intersection of science and faith." -- Ken Keathley, senior professor of theology, director of the Bush Center for Faith and Culture, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary "Although Dr. Swamidass and I disagree over the data and reach different conclusions about hominid evolution and the creation of humanity, The Genealogical Adam and Eve is a critical, timely, and beneficial contribution that will facilitate science/faith dialogue and help many see that faithful biblical interpretations do not conflict with evolutionary science. Everyone who thinks science and Christian faith must necessarily be at odds should read Swamidass's work with an open mind. I value and applaud Swamidass's contribution and heart in bringing an informed, scholarly understanding and voice to bear on these extremely important issues." -- Anjeanette "AJ" Roberts, molecular biologist/research scholar at Reasons to Believe "It is unusual to find a professional scientist with a keen interest in theology, but Joshua Swamidass, a computational biologist, is just such a person. The Genealogical Adam and Eve is a scientifically informed and biblically engaged study of human origins. Many will find shocking its claims concerning universal common ancestors in the relatively recent past. Agree or disagree, the reader will find this to be a stimulating and thought-provoking book." -- William Lane Craig, professor of philosophy, Talbot School of Theology and Houston Baptist University "Scientific progress of many sorts, such as our growing understanding of the human genome, surfaces a myriad of challenging questions about the human condition and our origins. Around these questions, this book invites a better conversation. For both scientific and theological communities, this book offers common language and an inviting narrative, establishing a foundation for mutual understanding and respect. In doing so, Swamidass demonstrates a compelling vision of meaningful and constructive dialogue and what this dialogue can achieve. Here―in a multifaceted conversation between faith, science, and our shared experience―we can engage grand questions together. Trust can grow and, with it, new avenues for discovery might arise." -- Philip R. O. Payne, professor and director of the Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine "A vital conversation unfolds between science and religion, engaging theologically motivated questions without letting theology impose itself on science. The conversation is grounded, but Swamidass takes us to a place of imagination and creativity―the intellectual wonder where many of us first learned of dinosaurs or first contemplated the meaning of life. The book starts with origins, but it gathers us all around the grand question: What does it mean to be human?" -- Jeff Mallinson, professor of theology and philosophy at Concordia University, Irvine "Professor Swamidass first introduced me to his very insightful idea of a genealogical Adam and Eve in a fascinating presentation at the American Scientific Affiliation annual meeting in 2017. His seminal distinction between a genealogical Adam and Eve and a genetic Adam and Eve is a paradigm pregnant with possibilities for reconciling evolutionary genetics with a historical Adam and Eve. It may also provide hermeneutical resources for Genesis 4–5, which gives more than a subtle hint that there were hominoids outside the Garden of Eden who were sufficiently like Adam and Eve genetically that they could breed and be dangerous. I hope that The Genealogical Adam and Eve will stimulate some creative new insights that will provide fertile ground for conversations between people who had believed they had irreconcilable differences in the faith and science dialogue." -- Walter L. Bradley, professor emeritus, Texas A&M University, and distinguished professor emeritus, Baylor University "Dr. Swamidass's contribution is extremely significant, reshaping our understanding of the theological implications of evolution and population genetics. There is a recurring pattern in the history of science and religion. First, a scientific discovery and its seeming implications are treated as settled science and demands are made for a radical departure from recognizable Christian theology. Second, a sober corrective recognizes the legitimacy of the discovery but clarifies the real implications, and in so doing provides breathing room for real theological reflection, development, and genuine intellectual progress. Dr Swamidass, in this book, offers just such a sober corrective." -- Clinton Ohlers, intellectual historian of science and religion, University of Hong Kong "Certain theological views are well founded and fundamentally important to a well-grounded system of belief; it can be rationally responsible to maintain those views, even if, for the time being, the science seems to call them into question. I believe this is true of basic theological beliefs about the origin of humankind and of sin. These are too well connected to the kind of experiences that are universally accessible and all-but-universally recognized. Sometimes, if we wait, new light will come in the scientific thinking. And sometimes as well, someone with enough imagination will propose a workable scenario that helps us past the apparent hump. Dr. Swamidass has indeed provided an imaginative and creative way forward, promoting a truly 'peaceful science.' I am grateful for his work and commend it to you." -- C. John "Jack" Collins, professor of Old Testament at Covenant Theological Seminary "Joshua Swamidass might not get a Nobel Prize in biology for The Genealogical Adam and Eve , but he should get a Nobel Peace Prize for his approach of kindness in trying to unite several disparate camps on the front lines of the origins debate. He masterfully takes the old and often-forgotten suggestion of a possible difference between the 'creation of man' events in chapter one vs. chapter two of Genesis, and he adds genetic legs. Being a computational geneticist, Swamidass has the expertise to assess the latest scientific data and compute that indeed, Adam and Eve could have been a single couple even in the last six thousand to ten thousand years and the progenitors of all human beings alive today, provided that the humanoids from chapter one of Genesis were breeding into the line from chapter two. Since I love the Bible and science, the reading was riveting. It is a delightful mixture of scholarship across disciplines, presented in an easy-to-access framework, and highly educational. I think all camps can walk away happy that they're right, in a way." -- James Tour, Rice University "Joshua Swamidass might not get a Nobel Prize in biology for The Genealogical Adam and Eve , but he should get a Nobel Peace Prize for his approach of kindness in trying to unite several disparate camps on the front lines of the origins debate. He masterfully takes the old and often-forgotten suggestion of a possible difference between the 'creation of man' events in chapter one vs. chapter two of Genesis, and he adds genetic legs. Being a computational geneticist, Swamidass has the expertise to assess the latest scientific data and compute that indeed, Adam and Eve could have been a single couple even in the last six thousand to ten thousand years and the progenitors of all human beings alive today, provided that the humanoids from chapter one of Genesis were breeding into the line from chapter two. Since I love the Bible and science, the reading was riveting. It is a delightful mixture of scholarship across disciplines, presented in an easy-to-access framework, and highly educational. I think all camps can walk away happy that they're right, in a way." -- James Tour, Rice University S. Joshua Swamidass (MD, PhD, UC–Irvine) is a scientist, physician, and associate professor of laboratory and genomic medicine at Washington University in Saint Louis, where he uses artificial intelligence to explore science at the intersection of medicine, biology, and chemistry. He is a Veritas Forums speaker and blogs at Peaceful Science . Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Evolutionary science teaches that humans arose as a population, sharing common ancestors with other animals. Most readers of the book of Genesis in the past understood all humans descended from Adam and Eve, a couple specially created by God. These two teachings seem contradictory, but is that necessarily so? In the fractured conversation of human origins, can new insight guide us to solid ground in both science and theology?
  • In
  • The Genealogical Adam and Eve
  • , S. Joshua Swamidass tests a scientific hypothesis: What if the traditional account is somehow true, with the origins of Adam and Eve taking place
  • alongside
  • evolution?
  • Building on well-established but overlooked science, Swamidass explains how it's possible for Adam and Eve to be rightly identified as the ancestors of everyone. His analysis opens up new possibilities for understanding Adam and Eve, consistent both with current scientific consensus and with traditional readings of Scripture. These new possibilities open a conversation about what it means to be human. In this book, Swamidass
  • untangles several misunderstandings about the words human and ancestry, in both science and theology
  • untangles several misunderstandings about the words
  • human
  • and
  • ancestry
  • , in both science and theology
  • explains how genetic and genealogical ancestry are different, and how universal genealogical ancestry creates a new opportunity for rapprochement
  • explains how
  • genetic
  • and
  • genealogical
  • ancestry are different, and how universal
  • genealogical
  • ancestry creates a new opportunity for rapprochement
  • explores implications of genealogical ancestry for the theology of the image of God, the fall, and people "outside the garden"
  • explores implications of
  • genealogical
  • ancestry for the theology of the image of God, the fall, and people "outside the garden"
  • Some think Adam and Eve are a myth. Some think evolution is a myth. Either way, the best available science opens up space to engage larger questions together. In this bold exploration, Swamidass charts a new way forward for peace between mainstream science and the Christian faith.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(66)
★★★★
25%
(55)
★★★
15%
(33)
★★
7%
(15)
23%
(51)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

An engaging, unconventional take on Biblical "creation" and evolution

Several years ago, here on Amazon in the review threads, I made the acquaintance of a man who is an evangelical Christian scholar. In the course of talking about working to promote understanding between scientists and those Christian communities that deny evolution, he raised a number of interesting points. He believed Adam and Eve were paranormally created, but did not think that there were no people before Adam and Eve. He thought humans shared common ancestry with the modern great apes, and so on down the whole history of life. He did, however, think that Adam and Eve were real, and that they had been "created" de novo in a world where others already lived, and that the Genesis account was compatible with these things. He thought that someone ought to write a book about this.

Well, Joshua Swamidass was not my correspondent, but he has written a book very much along these lines. He argues that nothing in our understanding of genetics and population dynamics excludes a paranormally-created Adam and Eve several thousand years ago, created on a world where there were already humans produced by evolution, who would by this time (and, indeed, by some time ago, which he considers important for theological reasons), having mixed with those earlier humans, be genealogical ancestors (along with many of their contemporaries) of all people everywhere on the planet. He provides some insight into the mathematics of ancestry, all of which seems in line with other credible sources, and which confirms this. He proceeds to discuss this in relation to scripture and theology, arguing that such a reading of Genesis is quite reasonable. This approach has much to recommend it, if one is trying to hold as closely as possible to the text of Genesis; among other things, it does solve the "where did Cain find his wife" problem that flummoxed William Jennings Bryan at the Scopes trial.

For many of us, these are solutions without a problem. We do not feel a need to defend belief in Adam and Eve in any sense. But for Swamidass and others, the problem is very real. It is no secret that in America, we have many people who are unwilling to let go of cherished beliefs, and for whom there can be no peace between religion and science; Swamidass shows that peace of this sort may be found in surprising places, through careful reevaluation of scripture in relation to science.

I have reservations about whether this peace is, however, something that many of those who believe in a literal Adam and Eve can accept. To some such people, the whole thing may simply smell of apostasy because this is not how Adam and Eve have been conventionally understood by most Christians; and they are certainly going to be troubled by the OTHER population bottleneck which a conventional reading of Genesis presents, and about which Swamidass says only a few lines: the flood of Noah, which must be assumed to be non-global for the genetic problems not to be merely transported to another Biblical tale. Meanwhile, the mainline Christians who are characteristically more flexible have already mostly discarded a literal Adam and Eve altogether, and do not seem to be yearning for a chance to dig it out of the dustbin.

I hope, against my own sense of probabilities, that Swamidass is right and that I am wrong. It may well be that there is a silent majority of relatively literalistic Christians who find themselves at war with science very much against their inclinations as people living in a modern, scientific culture. Their reaction to this book may be very positive indeed, and if this approach is successful in helping to bridge the gap between religion and science within our culture, it surely is a good thing. I give the book five stars in recognition of its noble cultural purpose, in recognition of its significant value in informing its audience of the sometimes surprising and counterintuitive features of populations, and in recognition of what seems to me to be the deep sincerity and goodwill of the author.

That said, it does seem to me that there are problems in the presentation which it is reasonable to note. I really do not think it is surprising, as Swamidass repeatedly suggests it is (and at one point characterizes this view as an "audaciously entertaining flip!"), that one-off paranormal occurrences such as the creation of a couple of people cannot be the subject of any sort of logical refutation or compelling scientific disconfirmation. While it is true that scientists have often said that our knowledge of biology excludes the possibility of Adam and Eve, that statement has generally been aimed, as Swamidass indicates, at a factual scenario where Adam and Eve are the only humans, created in a world where there never have been any humans at all, a few thousand years ago, and are not merely among our ancestors but, at that level of our family tree, our only ancestors. Swamidass agrees that such a scenario is foreclosed by the evidence. But when one revisits the question of just what the "Adam and Eve" scenario involves, and concludes that scripture does not demand that Adam and Eve be our sole ancestors at that level of our family tree, any scientific objection based upon genomics vanishes completely.

Science of course cannot "disprove" in any sense that Adam and Eve were created de novo. But science does not operate in the realm of proof and disproof, which are concepts that properly apply only to objects of formal logical reasoning, anyhow. Science cannot prove, or even convincingly demonstrate, that Napoleon was not born to a virgin. Science cannot prove that God does not create a few people every year, sticking them in obscure places and endowing them with identification papers and literacy in their local languages. Science cannot prove that Jesus was not raised from the dead, that Carl Sagan cannot be raised from the dead, or that God does not raise people from the dead on a fairly regular basis, when nobody is looking. Without some sort of empirical purchase upon claims of the paranormal, science is powerless.

But the powerlessness of empirical scrutiny to rule out a claim of paranormal activity is very far from a demonstration that that claim is true, or even that accounts of it are credible. I know that Swamidass understands this -- his epistemology is not flawed in any such respect -- but the fact that claim that a paranormal occurrence took place in the distant past is not demonstrably false simply is not very meaningful, at least to those who have no strong inclination to accept it.

On that point, I cannot help but be reminded, again and again while reading this book, of the end of the film Plan Nine From Outer Space, by Ed Wood:

"You have seen this incident, based on sworn testimony! Can you prove that it didn't happen?"

The answer, as always, is no. But I think that I speak for most viewers of the film when I say that I have never found myself looking for Bela Lugosi lurking behind the next bush.

It would have been better to my taste -- not, perhaps, to the project of rescuing fundamentalists from grave scientific error, but to my taste -- to simply acknowledge this generically. Not "science cannot disprove the de novo creation of Adam and Eve," but "science cannot, even in principle, demonstrate the impossibility of anything, especially if one assumes that paranormal omnipotent forces may, at their own caprice or for any reason unknown, do anything at any time without restraint from any principle of nature." With that, loose the dogs of religion! What more is there to say of any substance?

After all, when one reads the paranormal tales that open Icelandic sagas, slowly giving way to history, or other medieval stories of the paranormal, can science disprove THOSE things? When a Viking woman is said to have risen from the dead, uttered a prophecy, and fallen dead again, can science disprove THAT? Of course not. The point was underscored beautifully by Thomas Huxley in his essay, "On the Value of Witness to the Miraculous." Paranormal accounts such as the creation of Adam and Eve, the virgin birth, and the resurrection cannot be given any place of privilege merely because they form a part of Christian tradition; if they may be true, a proposition that evades any definitive negation, then so may other stories of paranormal occurrences, regardless of whether they are tales we learned at our parents' knees, tales that are told in far-away parts of the world, or tales that have been forgotten by all who once knew them. But this mere philosophical possibility is terribly thin gruel for people who feel they are in the possession of essential, universal truths about the very nature of reality and about their place in the universe.

The problem boils down to this: neither the tools of science nor the tools of history are competent to judge the paranormal tales contained in the folklore of this or of any other culture. Science cannot do it because these accounts of the paranormal are one-offs: they cannot be subjected to study to understand how they happened or to evaluate whether they indeed happened at all. History cannot do it because history cannot proceed without some kind of criterion of plausibility, which is precisely what must be discarded in order to admit stories of the paranormal into evidence. When a man says he can bend spoons with his mind, here and now, we can test that; when he says that a man once lived long ago who could do these things, or who could turn water into wine, we cannot.

I would have greatly enjoyed a deeper discussion of population genetics and dynamics, but do have to admit that this is as good a treatment of that topic, as it touches human ancestry, as I have yet seen in any book written for a general audience. I suspect that Swamidass could write a good deal more on this and related topics, and I hope he will; he is an able and engaging writer.

The theological portions of the book are undoubtedly of use to those who share the basic precepts of Christian belief. To the rest of us, it is a bit different. My own sense at first was that the theology is largely beside the point, except in the very limited role of showing that the text of Genesis, even if read more literally than most theologians would, does not require that Adam and Eve be the only people living on the earth at the time of their creation. But upon re-reading the theological sections, I began to feel that Swamidass did indeed have an important message for those of us whose dialogues with Christians have so often been frustrating. He has a gentle spirit and his attempts to find questions about values and humanity which are shared by Christians and non-Christians alike are perhaps a good guide to learning how to redirect those conversations into more positive avenues.

And so I find myself, at the end, very much in the same theater seat where I first saw Plan Nine. Can I prove it didn't happen? No; but that is the wrong question, I think, to ask. A better question, and the one which I hope this book helps some people who are struggling with, is: must I reject science because I believe the paranormal claims of my religion? I approve heartily of Swamidass's conclusion, even if I cannot join him as to method, and even if that question is one I would never ask; and when he brings his gentle spirit to more universal questions, like what it means to be human, as he does particularly in the later chapters, I find that we might disagree substantially as to method, and still wind up in the same place.
35 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Groundbreaking!!!

Dr. Swamidass has ended the mostly fictitious conflict between faith and science. The whole creation/evolution debate has now been solved and is over. The very real hypothesis of a Genealogical Adam and Eve that are the ancestors of us all while acknowledging the existence of people "outside of the Garden" that have always been there and now their relation to each other has finally been answered. While Christian Philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig disagrees on some point both WLG and Dr. Swamidass agree on the existance of a literal and historical Adam and Eve. Buy this book, find the answers, both biblucal and scientific, and deepen your faith and knowledge of God and this wonderful world He created starting with us.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Better Way...

Interestingly, (to me anyhow) I was not drawn to this topic originally. The relationship between A and E and the rest of humanity was never a particularly interest of mine. What was very interesting to me, however, was "a better way" to reconcile what we read in the Bible with the findings of modern science. This is what drew me to this book.

The more I read, the more I enjoyed and appreciated the handling of such challenging topics as original sin, The Fall of Man, race, and what was going on outside of The Garden, in such a way that the sum was much greater than the parts. Let me clarify, this book is not about unity being force-fit or force-fed. It's an intelligent and articulate proposal as to how these theological concepts can all be reconciled within a framework of modern understanding.

No one will agree 100% with the conclusions that Dr. Swamidass draws in his book, but that's not because of his efforts. Rather, it is the nature of these minefield topics, themselves, that will bring the reader outside of her own comfort zone. And this is a good thing because we can all stand to pause and review why it is that we believe what we believe about these topics.

Kudos on a well-written book.
2 people found this helpful