The Children of Men
The Children of Men book cover

The Children of Men

Paperback – May 16, 2006

Price
$13.99
Format
Paperback
Pages
256
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0307275431
Dimensions
5.21 x 0.57 x 7.98 inches
Weight
6.8 ounces

Description

"A book of such accelerating tension that the pages seem to turn faster as one moves along." — Chicago Tribune "As scary and suspenseful as anything in Hitchcock." — The New Yorker "Extraordinary.... Daring.... Frightening in its implications." — The New York Times "Fascinating, suspenseful, and morally provocative. The characterizations are sharply etched and the narrative is compelling."— Chicago Sun-Times “[James] writes like an angel. Every character is closely drawn. Her atmosphere is unerringly, chillingly convincing. And she manages all this without for a moment slowing down the drive and tension of an exciting mystery.”xa0— The Times (UK) P. D. JAMES is the author of twenty books, many of which feature her detective hero Adam Dalgliesh and have been televised or filmed. She was the recipient of many honors, including the Mystery Writers of America Grand Master Award and the National Arts Club Medal of Honor for Literature, and in 1991 was created Baroness James of Holland Park. She died in 2014. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. BOOK ONEOMEGA January—March 2021 1 Friday 1 January 2021Early this morning, 1 January 2021, three minutes after midnight, the last human being to be born on earth was killed in a pub brawl in a suburb of Buenos Aires, aged twenty-five years two months and twelve days. If the first reports are to be believed, Joseph Ricardo died as he had lived. The distinction, if one can call it that, of being the last human whose birth was officially recorded, unrelated as it was to any personal virtue or talent, had always been difficult for him to handle. And now he is dead. The news was given to us here in Britain on the nine o’clock programme of the State Radio Service and I heard it fortuitously. I had settled down to begin this diary of the last half of my life when I noticed the time and thought I might as well catch the headlines to the nine o’clock bulletin. Ricardo’s death was the last item mentioned, and then only briefly, a couple of sentences delivered without emphasis in the newscaster’s carefully non-committal voice. But it seemed to me, hearing it, that it was a small additional justification for beginning the diary today; the first day of a new year and my fiftieth birthday. As a child I had always liked that distinction, despite the inconvenience of having it follow Christmas too quickly so that one present – it never seemed notably superior to the one I would in any case have received – had to do for both celebrations.As I begin writing, the three events, the New Year, my fiftieth birthday, Ricardo’s death, hardly justify sullying the first pages of this new loose-leaf notebook. But I shall continue, one small additional defence against personal accidie. If there is nothing to record, I shall record the nothingness and then if, and when, I reach old age – as most of us can expect to, we have become experts at prolonging life – I shall open one of my tins of hoarded matches and light my small personal bonfire of vanities. I have no intention of leaving the diary as a record of one man’s last years. Even in my most egotistical moods I am not as self-deceiving as that. What possible interest can there be in the journal of Theodore Faron, Doctor of Philosophy, Fellow of Merton College in the University of Oxford, historian of the Victorian age, divorced, childless, solitary, whose only claim to notice is that he is cousin to Xan Lyppiatt, the dictator and Warden of England. No additional personal record is, in any case, necessary. All over the world nation states are preparing to store their testimony for the posterity which we can still occasionally convince ourselves may follow us, those creatures from another planet who may land on this green wilderness and ask what kind of sentient life once inhabited it. We are storing our books and manuscripts, the great paintings, the musical scores and instruments, the artefacts. The world’s greatest libraries will in forty years’ time at most be darkened and sealed. The buildings, those that are still standing, will speak for themselves. The soft stone of Oxford is unlikely to survive more than a couple of centuries. Already the University is arguing about whether it is worth refacing the crumbling Sheldonian. But I like to think of those mythical creatures landing in St. Peter’s Square and entering the great Basilica, silent and echoing under the centuries of dust. Will they realize that this was once the greatest of man’s temples to one of his many gods? Will they be curious about his nature, this deity who was worshipped with such pomp and splendour, intrigued by the mystery of his symbol, at once so simple, the two crossed sticks, ubiquitous in nature, yet laden with gold, gloriously jewelled and adorned? Or will their values and their thought processes be so alien to ours that nothing of awe or wonder will be able to touch them? But despite the discovery – in 1997 was it? – of a planet which the astronomers told us could support life, few of us really believe that they will come. They must be there. It is surely unreasonable to credit that only one small star in the immensity of the universe is capable of developing and supporting intelligent life. But we shall not get to them and they will not come to us.Twenty years ago, when the world was already half convinced that our species had lost for ever the power to reproduce, the search to find the last-known human birth became a universal obsession, elevated to a matter of national pride, an international contest as ultimately pointless as it was fierce and acrimonious. To qualify the birth had to be officially notified, the date and precise time recorded. This effectively excluded a high proportion of the human race where the day but not the hour was known, and it was accepted, but not emphasized, that the result could never be conclusive. Almost certainly in some remote jungle, in some primitive hut, the last human being had slipped largely unnoticed into an unregarding world. But after months of checking and re-checking, Joseph Ricardo, of mixed race, born illegitimately in a Buenos Aires hospital at two minutes past three Western time on 19 October 1995, had been officially recognized. Once the result was proclaimed, he was left to exploit his celebrity as best he could while the world, as if suddenly aware of the futility of the exercise, turned its attention elsewhere. And now he is dead and I doubt whether any country will be eager to drag the other candidates from oblivion.We are outraged and demoralized less by the impending end of our species, less even by our inability to prevent it, than by our failure to discover the cause. Western science and Western medicine haven’t prepared us for the magnitude and humiliation of this ultimate failure. There have been many diseases which have been difficult to diagnose or cure and one which almost depopulated two continents before it spent itself. But we have always in the end been able to explain why. We have given names to the viruses and germs which, even today, take possession of us, much to our chagrin since it seems a personal affront that they should still assail us, like old enemies who keep up the skirmish and bring down the occasional victim when their victory is assured. Western science has been our god. In the variety of its power it has preserved, comforted, healed, warmed, fed and entertained us and we have felt free to criticize and occasionally reject it as men have always rejected their gods, but in the knowledge that despite our apostasy, this deity, our creature and our slave, would still provide for us; the anaesthetic for the pain, the spare heart, the new lung, the antibiotic, the moving wheels and the moving pictures. The light will always come on when we press the switch and if it doesn’t we can find out why. Science was never a subject I was at home with. I understood little of it at school and I understand little more now that I’m fifty. Yet it has been my god too, even if its achievements are incomprehensible to me, and I share the universal disillusionment of those whose god has died. I can clearly remember the confident words of one biologist spoken when it had finally become apparent that nowhere in the whole world was there a pregnant woman: “It may take us some time to discover the cause of this apparent universal infertility.” We have had twenty-five years and we no longer even expect to succeed. Like a lecherous stud suddenly stricken with impotence, we are humiliated at the very heart of our faith in ourselves. For all our knowledge, our intelligence, our power, we can no longer do what the animals do without thought. No wonder we both worship and resent them. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A modern science fiction classic from an acclaimed bestselling author: The year is 2021. No child has been born for twenty-five years. The human race faces extinction."A book of such accelerating tension that the pages seem to turn faster as one moves along." —
  • Chicago Tribune
  • Civilization itself is crumbling as suicide and despair become commonplace. Oxford historian Theodore Faron, apathetic toward a future without a future, spends most of his time reminiscing. Then he is approached by Julian, a bright, attractive woman who wants him to help get her an audience with his cousin, the powerful Warden of England. She and her band of unlikely revolutionaries may just awaken his desire to live . . . and they may also hold the key to survival for the human race.Told with P. D. James’s trademark suspense, insightful characterization, and riveting storytelling,
  • The Children of Men
  • is a story of a world with no children and no future.
  • The inspiration for director Alfonso Cuarón's modern masterpiece of a film.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(872)
★★★★
25%
(727)
★★★
15%
(436)
★★
7%
(204)
23%
(669)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Intriguing premise, but James is no Orwell

What if everyone on earth suddenly became sterile? It's an intriguing premise, and one which certainly invites one to stop and ponder for a moment. What would a humanity doomed to extinction within a generation look like? In PD James' vision, it looks like relentless boredom, half-crazed women nursing dolls, fully crazed Omegas (the last generation of children) conducting ritual sacrifices, and a dictator named Xan who is vaguely reminiscent of Big Brother. Oh, yes, and let's not forget tinned peaches, petrol and an Oxford professor with intimacy issues.

If I sound a little sarcastic, that is because a world in which there were no births would bear no resemblance at all to the one which PD James has painted for us. First of all, the citizens in such a world would not be eating tinned peaches, they would be eating each other. Capitalist economies depend on growth to remain viable. That is to say, businesses which do not show growth for several quarters running (and with a 30% reduction in the world's population, growth would definitely be out of the question) go bankrupt. Stock prices plummet, credit is withdrawn, and people lose jobs. Now, imagine that happening all over the world at the same time. All the banks fail at once, corporations fold, nobody (in the industrialized nations at least) has employment. It would be a complete disaster. Not the somewhat cozy,let's-be-depressed-over-a cup-of-tea scenario in The Children of Men.

That being said, the book is wonderfully written (although all the pointless running around at the end becomes a bit tedious). PD James expresses herself fully, in fine British fashion, not sparing us a whit of character-building vocabulary or A level syntax. The main character is interesting, and the dialogue fluid. And it moves along quite nicely. (If you don't stop and ask yourself too many questions. Like, why are they doing this?)
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great premise, little reward

I decided to read "Children of Men" after seeing a trailer for the movie based on the book, figuring that the book is always better than the movie. I was fascinated by the premise: that the human race can no longer reproduce, and is gradually aging toward extinction. I wondered what an author's creative imagination could create to explore such a society.

Though my curiosity was to an extent quenched, the book is overall a bit dull (the "fast-paced" ending finally reaches a moderate pace). I almost stopped reading it several times during the especially slow exposition. It is most definitely not a thriller. I also had no basis upon which to sympathize with any of the characters and was more often than not annoyed by them. Some parts of the plot lack any supporting reason and feel like gaping holes in the novel. Theo's references to Natalie and her death seem only to accentuate his aversion to children, which conflicts confusingly with his allegiance to Julian and the hope for the human race. Finally, I disliked the book's form; it varied between Theo's journal entries and a third-person narration. I suppose it was necessary both to objectively describe the action and to provide a window into actually living in such a world, but the changes were abrupt and irritating.

It had a great inspiration, but it doesn't fulfill the promise of that inspiration. I may still go to see the movie, because movies tend to cut out the fluff. Recommended to patient readers.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Better than the movie

It is not unusual for books to be better than the movie based on the book. However, this book is many times better. The movie was total violence from beginning to end, but there was little violence in the book. Also story line was so much more developed and the characters much more interesting. I also liked the ending of the book. I will say that I would probably never have read the book had I not seen the movie first and was curious as to how it compared with the book
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

It Ain't the Movie

"Children of Men" (the movie) is a raw and relentless movie about the end of the world. Mass sterility has made it impossible for women to have babies. The social fabric is unraveling: cities are decaying: terrorists are battling a police state: and most people are either suicidal, half-crazed on religion, or zonked on drugs or booze. It's the most visually-rich dystopian movie since "Bladerunner." In contrast, "Children of Men" (the book) is stilted, precious, and overwritten. Its world is dying, too, but this fact doesn't seem to register with the characters. They teach history classes at night, fret over failed marriages, tour European museums, christen newborn kittens, and fight dictators by distributing ACLU-ish flyers to their neighbors, as if the imminent death of the human race wouldn't crowd out the preoccupations of ordinary life. The movie and the book have little in common except the shared premise of mass sterility. Fans of P.D. James might like the book, but fans of the movie will be disappointed.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A promising premise but an illogical execution

The premise of this 1992 futuristic novel is very intriguing--suddenly and all at once, all human sperm becomes non-viable, even that previously frozen in sperm banks. No more babies. The book opens in 2021, when the last children born are 25 years old and hope has died for a solution to the problem. The possibilities for plot development and speculation are myriad. How would people behave if they knew that humanity was doomed to extinction in 60 years or so? How might the youngest ones react, knowing that one among them may be the last person left alive? And what about the older people, as they realize that nobody may care to help them in their final years? Would civilized behavior go out the window?

Unfortunately, this novel does not examine many of those issues, concentrating instead on one middle-aged professor and his transformation from a detached observer with a seeming inability to love anyone into a loving human being capable of love and self sacrifice. Neither his abrupt change nor the actions of the other primary characters seem very logical.

For example, the most dramatic development is the pregnancy of a young woman with its implication for the salvation of mankind. Rather than revealing herself and the father with living sperm to the world, she insists on delivering her baby in secret in less-than-ideal circumstances, because she does not want the Warden of England (whom she considers to be evil) present at the birth.

And then there's the plot about the 5-person rebellion of sorts against the Warden of England, who has brought a measure of peace and order to the country, suggested not to exist in other countries. His pragmatic solutions appear to the dissidents to be evil, but most people welcome his rule and would vote for him if given the opportunity. (An examination of whether or not a benevolent dictatorship is sometimes a better solution to a dire situation than democratic chaos might have been interesting here.) Particularly illogical is the group's complaint that the mandatory government checking of male sperm is demeaning to the tested. Really? We are talking about the survival of humanity here and they find testing to be demeaning?

Ultimately, I was disappointed in this book because I believe the author could not decide whether it was a dystopian survival novel or an examination of one person's redemption through love. Perhaps these two themes could be combined successfully, but James did make either strand believable.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

This is not the movie in book form. But its great in its own right.

Don't expect to read the movie script. For the most part, some concepts for the movie are taken from the book. But the book is fantastic as a near apocalyptic novel, and as a social commentary drama. I was very pleasantly surprised by the superb writing and the methodology of the story. Not to mention, that I was never disappointed that parts of the movie never happen in the book.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Enjoyed it, but not exactly an upbeat reading experience.

Overall, I enjoyed the book and recommend it. I suspect it will be (surprise, surprise) much better than the movie. But, be prepared for a VERY somber reading experience. Not exactly escapist literature. I think there are some holes in character development and the ending is a bit abrupt. I'm still trying to decide if the ending follows logically from the rest of the story. However, I can say that reading it was NOT time wasted!
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Haunting, harried and hopeful in the end, a really good read

P.D. James' The Children of Men inspired a really exciting movie, but the novel's deeper and stronger, more thought-provoking and, in its own way, possibly even more thrilling. While the movie presents a world-wide disaster from the points of view of a few, the novel manages to create both global and intimate views simultaneously. A well-educated protagonist comments on life and influence in his diary, recognizing the needs of the downtrodden even while he blithely seems to ignore them. But his influence has waned and the reader soon wonders if he's a more honorable man than he cares to believe. Meanwhile other characters come to him for help and soon dispassionate understanding gives way to dangerous actions and, possibly, hope.

While the opening of the novel seems far less dark and far more comfortably contemporary than that of the movie, the themes of a world without children are none the less haunting and the author's imagining of how the world might change are scarily plausible, inviting questions of what's truly important and where the boundaries of good behavior and social acceptance should lie. The reader is quickly drawn into the protagonist's world, seeing the decay of academia as a mirror of society's fall, and reading the protagonist's diary in hopes of learning more. His musings pair hope and despair. His actions pair honesty and deception. The consequences pair guilt and promise. And the whole is a beautifully balanced novel, thoroughly enthralling, hauntingly evocative, and intriguingly provocative. Faith, religion, law and order all play their part, but the greatest of these just might prove after all to be love.

Disclosure: I borrowed this novel from one of my mother's friends.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Interesting crossover

This is a bit of curiosity -- a science fiction novel by a writer who is mostly famous for mystery novels. I am curious as to why mainstream British authors often try their hands at science fiction ( BRAVE NEW WORLD, 1984, PERELANDRA, NEVER LET ME GO, etc) while American scifi writers seem to be isolated as a separate club, but that's not the main point of the review.

The novel, written in 1991, concerns a hypothetical future (or alternative history, from the perspecive of 2012) in which humanity loses its ability to reproduce, and the current generation realizes that it is the LAST generation. The best parts of the novel is the effects of the sterility on the culture -- the abandonment of outlying areas of the country, the neurotic search for child substitutes such as pets and dolls, the effects of sterility on love and marriage. The biggest flaw is a rather contrived coincidence that drives the plot -- the last pregnant woman just happens to be a friend of the British dictator's nearest relative. The British upper classes are inbred even when they don't breed.

One oddity, from 2012, is the absense of cell phone/IPOD/personal-computer technology from this future. Either Lady James didn't foresee it, or she thought that the crisis would prevent it from developing. Technology-wise, the characters might as well still be living in the 1970s or so.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not your normal P. D. James book

For those uninformed readers who buy this book expecting Ms. James' normal detective mystery, they will be disappointed. However, those who know the premise of the book, and enjoy excellent writing and a taut plotline will find this book greatly to their taste. We are given a future time when the population of the world is infertile, and England is run by a Warden, assisted by a Council of advisors. Life doesn't appear to be too awful, even if there is no future for mankind. The tale ropes us in fairly quickly, and soon there is a race to flee from the authorities so that the first pregnant woman in many years may be able to give birth in peace. There is tragedy and triumph in this book, and also much love. There really aren't any villians in this story, for even those opposed to the hero and his friends believe in trying to find an answer to the infertility problem. The writing is up to Ms. James' usual excellent standards, and this book is very well worth reading, even if this is not your regular impression of P. D. James.
3 people found this helpful