The Brothers K
The Brothers K book cover

The Brothers K

Paperback – June 1, 1996

Price
$18.52
Format
Paperback
Pages
645
Publisher
Dial Press Trade Paperback
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0553378498
Dimensions
5.19 x 1.42 x 8.2 inches
Weight
1.15 pounds

Description

“The pages of The Brothers K sparkle.” — The New York Times Book Review “Duncan is a wonderfully engaging writer.” — Los Angeles Times “This ambitious book succeeds on almost every level and every page.” — USA Today “Duncan’s prose is a blend of lyrical rhapsody, sassy hyperbole and all-American vernacular.” — San Francisco Chronicle “ The Brothers K affords the . . . deep pleasures of novels that exhaustively create, and alter, complex worlds. . . . One always senses an enthusiastic and abundantly talented and versatile writer at work.” — The Washington Post Book World “Duncan . . . tells the larger story of an entire popular culture struggling to redefine itself—something he does with the comic excitement and depth of feeling one expects from Tom Robbins.” — Chicago Tribune From the Inside Flap Finally in trade paperback, complementingxa0xa0Bantam's new release of River Teeth and our consistently bestselling edition of The River Why , here is Thexa0xa0Brothers K , a lyrical and lovely novel ofxa0xa0family. Finally in trade paperback, complementing Bantam's new release of "River Teeth and our consistently bestselling edition of "The River Why, here is "The Brothers K, a lyrical and lovely novel of family. David James Duncan is the author of The River Why, which won the Pacific Northwest Booksellers Award in 1983, and River Teeth, a collection of stories and writings. He lives with his wife, the sculptor Adrian Arleo, and family, in Western Montana where he is at work on his next novel. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. CHAPTER ONE Chevalier xa0 Thank you! Thank you! —last words of D. T. Suzuki Camas, Washington/September/1956 xa0 Papa is in his easy chair, reading the Sunday sports page. I am lying across his lap. Later he will rise to his feet and the lap will divide into parts—plaid shirt, brown leather belt, baggy tan trousers—but for now the lap is one thing: a ground, a region, an earth. My head rests on one wide, cushioned arm of the chair, my feet on the other. The rest of me rests on Papa. The newspaper blocks his face from view, but the vast pages vibrate in time to his pulse, and the ballplayer in the photo looks serious. I ask no questions. I stay quiet. I feel his slow, even breathing. I smell his smoke. xa0 On the opposite chair arm, beside my argyle shins, is a small ashtray—an upholstered sandbag with five brass grooves arching over a green glass dish. Papa’s cigarette smolders in the center groove. It has no filter. It’s called a Lucky Strike. Past its slow blue smoke is the diningroom window. Past the window, yellowing maples and a low gray sky. Past the maples and under the sky, a neighbor man with a pitchfork, burning an immense pile of black limbs and old brown leaves. xa0 Papa’s hand appears. It hangs above the ashtray. It is blue-veined, black-haired, brown-skinned, scarred and powerful. It takes up the cigarette and disappears behind the paper. The neighbor man throws an enormous forkful of leaves onto the burn pile, smothering the flames. Papa takes a deep breath. The hand returns the cigarette to the same brass groove, a quarter-inch orange coal on the end of it now, the smoke rising up much faster than before. A dense cloud of white billows up through the smoldering leaves. Papa breathes out. The leaves ignite. Even through the window I hear them bursting into flame. Papa turns a page, the paper makes the same crackling, burning sound, and I glimpse his eyes before the paper reopens: they are serious, like the ballplayer’s. xa0 Idly Papa’s long fingers twist the ashtray in a circle. Slowly the man with the pitchfork circles his burning brush. The hand picks up the cigarette. The man forks more leaves onto the fire. The hand returns the cigarette, folds it against the green glass, crushes the hot coal with the tip of a bare finger. The man stares for a moment into the fire, then sticks his fork in the ground and walks away. xa0 The newspaper shudders, closes, then drops, and there is his face: the sun-browned skin and high cheekbones; the slightly hooked, almost Bedouin nose; the strong jaw still shiny from a late-morning shave, a few missed whiskers at the base of each nostril; the gray eyes—clear, kind, already crowfooted, and always just a little sad around the edges. xa0 There he is. Papa. There is my father. xa0 The screen door slams. I lurch, open my eyes—newspaper falls from my body. I am lying alone in my father’s chair. He has vanished right out from under me, leaving a blanket of sports page when he left. I look outside: the sky is still low and gray, yellow leaves still waving, but the burn pile is ashes and the man and pitchfork are gone. I look at the chair arm: the ashtray is still there, but the green glass is clean, the ashes and Lucky butt gone. xa0 I can tell by the heaviness of step that it’s my brother Irwin back in the kitchen. When I hear the icebox open, I know that neither Mama nor Papa is in the house. I hear him gulping milk straight out of the bottle. Germs … I hear the careful folding and refolding of wax paper round a plate of leftovers. Thou shalt not steal … I hear a shout somewhere outside, and Irwin darts into the diningroom, his mouth stuffed full of something, his eyes bulging, then, seeing no one, relieved. xa0 “Where’s Papa?” I ask. xa0 He jumps, bolts the food, chokes a little, laughs. “Where are you?” xa0 I sit up in the chair. xa0 He laughs again, starts back toward the kitchen, then calls back to me, “Battle Ground. Playin’ ball.” xa0 The screen door slams. xa0 I am alone on the floor of mine and Irwin’s room now, picturing Battle Ground. I’ve been there, Mama says. It’s got the big park with the pool where I waded with my boats when it was too hot to be in the bleachers, she says. I can’t remember the bleachers, I can’t remember the ballfield, but I remember the pool. And now I think I remember the tall men with caps and gloves running over the grass, splashing in and out of the water, throwing and hitting baseballs and singing Aaaaaa! Aaaaaa! and Hum Babe! and Hey, Batter! My oldest brother, Everett, showed me how they sing. He said that Hum Babes are special, because Papa is the pitcher and it’s his pitches that hum. I said, They call Papa a babe? No, Everett said, they just sing Hum Babe to the pitches, but some players call him Smoke because of his Lucky Strikes and fastball, and some call him Hook because of his curveballs and nose. I said I thought they were just plain baseballs. He said they were, but that curveballs and fastballs are kinds of pitches, and pitches are special throws nobody but the pitcher knows how to make, and Papa has seven different kinds, not counting his different deliveries. He didn’t say what a delivery was, but he said Papa had a kind that went ffffffffwirp! called a sinker, and a kind that went ffffffffweet! called a slider and a kind that went ffffffffwow! called a forkball and a kind that went bleeeeeeeeeeurp! called a change-up and a secret kind too, called a knuckler, which he only used when he was red-hot since it might go rrow!rrow!rrow! or might do nothing at all, and I felt almost like crying by then, I was so confused and wanted so much not to be. Everett noticed, and shoved me in a gruff, friendly sort of way. Don’t worry, he said. Next summer I’d be old enough to go watch him pitch, and soon as I watched him I’d understand everything fine … xa0 But I don’t want to understand next summer. I want to understand now. So I have the sports page here beside me on the floor, open to the ballplayer with the serious face. And this is not an orange crayon in my mouth. It’s a Lucky Strike. “Fffffffweeet!” I tell it. This isn’t the lid of a mayonnaise jar in my hand, either. It’s an ashtray. “Bleeeeeeeeeeurp!” And Bobby, my bear, is the neighbor man and this salad fork is his pitchfork and these piled blankets are the pile of burning brush. Because I am not me. I am Smoke! I am my father! and the harder I suck the Lucky the hotter burns the brush! Aaaaaaaaaaa! the fire hums, babe, the flames ffffffffwirp and ffffffffwow! And when I spin my ashtray the neighbor man is helpless: I spin, spin, spin it, he whirls round and round and round. Then I throw, I forkball, I pitchfork my Lucky clear up to the sky and rrow!rrow!rrow! flaming leaves and limbs and papers knuckle every which way and the trees and batters and people and houses burn! burn! burn! xa0 I saw. xa0 I saw what Papa was doing. xa0 And next year I’ll go with my brother to watch all the ballplayers splash and throw and sing. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A
  • NEW YORK TIMES
  • NOTABLE BOOK
  • Once in a great while a writer comes along who can truly capture the drama and passion of the life of a family. David James Duncan, author of the novel
  • The River Why
  • and the collection
  • River Teeth,
  • is just such a writer. And in
  • The Brothers K
  • he tells a story both striking and in its originality and poignant in its universality.   This touching, uplifting novel spans decades of loyalty, anger, regret, and love in the lives of the Chance family. A father whose dreams of glory on a baseball field are shattered by a mill accident. A mother who clings obsessively to religion as a ward against the darkest hour of her past. Four brothers who come of age during the seismic upheavals of the sixties and who each choose their own way to deal with what the world has become. By turns uproariously funny and deeply moving, and beautifully written throughout,
  • The Brothers K
  • is one of the finest chronicles of our lives in many years.
  • Praise for
  • The Brothers K
  • “The pages of
  • The Brothers K
  • sparkle.”
  • The New York Times Book Review
  • “Duncan is a wonderfully engaging writer.”
  • Los Angeles Times
  • “This ambitious book succeeds on almost every level and every page.”
  • USA Today
  • “Duncan’s prose is a blend of lyrical rhapsody, sassy hyperbole and all-American vernacular.”
  • San Francisco Chronicle
  • The Brothers K
  • affords the . . . deep pleasures of novels that exhaustively create, and alter, complex worlds. . . . One always senses an enthusiastic and abundantly talented and versatile writer at work.”
  • The Washington Post Book World
  • “Duncan . . . tells the larger story of an entire popular culture struggling to redefine itself—something he does with the comic excitement and depth of feeling one expects from Tom Robbins.”
  • Chicago Tribune

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(667)
★★★★
25%
(278)
★★★
15%
(167)
★★
7%
(78)
-7%
(-79)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Epic & addictive.

Sigh. Who has time for the epics anymore? Not a college student, it would seem. "Read?" most scoff. "I haven't got time, what with my busy schedule, for a short story, let alone a big book that reaches nearly 700 pages in length."
Still, somewhere out there is the rare reader who likes the challenge an epic presents, loves to get lost in fascinating, multi-layered characterizations and plots that expand over decades.
For those readers, there is David James Duncan's 1992 offering, "The Brothers K." It excels on all those fronts I just mentioned, and on several more.
But when a friend recently handed it over to me, suggesting that I take a look, I too balked at its size:
"Look at it! Are you trying to kill any semblance of a social life I may have? This thing is mammoth and unwieldy!"
But my friend was persistent and so I went home and took a look. And soon became lost in the words, the story, the characters.
"Brothers K" is about the Chance family. Father Hugh is a mill worker who used to be the most promising baseball player around, until an accident at the mill cost him his dream. Mother Laura clings obsessively to her Adventist religion, since it once protected her from the darkest hour of her past.
Together, they have four boys and two twin girls. Everett is the oldest, a charming, witty rogue who doesn't share Laura's faith. Peter is next, and is a fellow cynic. Irwin is the large and innocent third child. Kincaid is a blank slate, who serves as the readers' eyes in the guise of the book's narrator.
The twin girls, Bet and Freddy, come later and more or less fulfill the role of younger sisters to the four brothers and little else, although they have a heartbreaking scene involving their grandmother's death that paves the way for the story to come full circle later.
Those are the characters. There is a plot, but Duncan takes it so lackadaisically and slow across the sands of time that in essence it can all be summed up in one word: Lifetime. For this is very much the saga of the Chance family, and all of their adventures therein.
We literally see the Chance boys grow up before our very eyes, watch as their characters age and grow, or regress, experience life and flirt with death.
Around halfway through the book, the four brothers (the "K" is an allusion to "The Brothers Karamazov," by Fyodor Dostoyevsky) each go off in search of their own way; Everett becomes a draft-dodger, Peter a philosopher, Kincaid a hippie, and Irwin goes to fight in Vietnam.
There is no rush on Duncan's part to tell the story, and so there can be no rush from the reader to finish it.
For this is a book in which the getting there is very much the draw, and readers are rewarded their patience by Duncan's sense of humor, sometimes gentle, other times abrasive, many times subtle and always hilarious.
But if you're the sort who seeks immediate gratification and "lite" escape from your reading, "Brothers K" is told in a series of broken up chapters and chapters-within-chapters, making it easier to simply pick it up, read a section or two and then return to whatever else you were doing.
If you can, that is. It's a hypnotic, intoxicating read, which will make putting the book down difficult.
And when you finally do finish, if you're like me, you will be so moved from the whole experience you will have to leave the room and walk the book off. It's that good.
Upon returning to your room, of course, there will be the brand-new temptation to pick it up and start all over again.
150 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Riveting and enchanting

This was a wonderful, quirky, funny, tragic, heartwarming portrayal of family life set on the backdrop of the 1960s. It had the enjoyment of a John Irving novel, but much better - PG and not so over the top. You'll just love every one of these characters. And if you are a baseball fan, all the better.
A friend handed this book off to me as she finished it, not knowing I was a baseball fan. I looked at the 600 pages and rolled my eyes - and then I started reading and couldn't stop. She had to attempt reading it twice to get through it - thought the beginning dragged. The second attempt won her over. I didn't feel this way (one attempt was enough to win me), but I imagine if you aren't a baseball fan that portions will not be as interesting to you. However, so much more is going on that there is plenty to keep everyone entertained.
A bonus for me is that these kids come of age around the time I did. But I don't think you'll need to have lived through the 60s to enjoy it.
You'll laugh, you'll cry - and come away very satisfied.
18 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Lacks the goofy charm of The River Why

The River Why, published in 1983, was flawed and self-indulgent but ultimately likeable. In fact, it was almost impossible to dislike. The Brothers K (1992), longer and heavier and duller, has its moments but I had a hard time giving it three stars.

What did Duncan do in the near-decade between these two books? Read quite a lot of John Irving, apparently. There were traces of the Irving influence in the first book but the second leans so heavily on the author of Garp as to be almost an homage. One John Irving is enough (some of us would say it's one too many).

One thing Duncan did not do in those nine years is hone his craft. If, like me, you are looking for improvement--a tighter story, better ending, etc., The Brothers K will be a disappointment. Duncan just wrote on and on, it feels like, until he decided to stop, at which point he wound things down in fairly predictable, if Irving-like, fashion.

There isn't enough baseball in the story, either, not enough to suit this reviewer anyway. Duncan wanders away from that grand game, only to end up in Vietnam. This is problematic for two reasons: 1) Vietnam has already been covered to death in both novels and films 2) some of this novelistic coverage comes from guys who were actually there and, though there are as many different takes on the war as there are authors, every single one of them has more authority than Duncan's, which is both cliché and unbelievable. Actually, right here, right now, in 2013, there's a third problem with the Vietnam angle and that is that it just feels outdated. We've got two other wars going on now and more in the offing. Duncan might as well have been writing about the Franco-Prussian War for all the relevance he's given Vietnam.

The book does have its moment though, most of them involving baseball, and, if you like Duncan, you'll probably want to read this. As other reviewers have pointed out, it would be a lot better if it were shorter.
15 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

starts well, ends without climax.

This "epic" was interesting at first because it roughly covers those times that I grew up. Its the "Christmas Story" film for English Literature Lovers who read and love these kind of novels. Originally given to me due the giver knew I liked biography, I find it hard to place this in any genre. It doesn't really have a plot, although some find that wonderful, it bounds from one scene to another. This can be a usefull tool, but I felt the author took a few minutes from writing for a tofo burger, and forgot where he ended his last page.

Worst of all, as a historian, and also someone who lived through the Viet Nam War, and what really happened to deserters and draft dodgers, I find novels celebrating their celebrity someone sickning. After the Viet Nam War, the Federal Judge in the Western District had advised ALL law enforecment in The Federal District of NY, that he would not prosecute any Selective Service Cases. Since Buffalo, is close to Canada, thousand of Seclective Service Violtators would be arrested at the border, as their laws required, and US law enforement, primarily the FBI would be called to go throught the formality (and waste of the taxpayer)to get the United States Attorney to decline prosecution. I can't formally state that was true of all districts, but I know it was in WNY. That means they could live, work, basically go to and from anywhere in the US without worring about going to jail. The number of Selective Service Violators who went to jail, I could count on my thumbs, unless they were wanted for riot, murder, arson etc. associated with their desent.

The authors description of the "Stalinist" behavior of the US should have tried publishing his novel in Russia. They don't trust desenters, or any kind. In view of the facts that have occured since the War, I am still waiting for the recognition that the US was at least not anymore as ugly as any other country that fell into an unpopular and perhaps unecessary war. I was not a volunteer, but I went, in place of someone who went to Canada or Sweden. I may tell my grandkids, including my grandaughters to move somewhere to avoid the current bad guys. I know I sure as hell could not count on those who ran. I will let this country find out that as bad as it is, its better than most, certainly better than our enemies were during the Viet Nam War. One more item. The war was basically started during the Kennedy Administration. Why doesn't anyone blame him? LBJ was President when I was sent. But Nixon, gets blamed by the writer and lovers of this book. If you were in the service at the time, you would know that Nixon began to end what Kennedy and LBJ had started.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Brothers K

I have one word for David James Duncan-editing. While I enjoyed the basis of the story, family bonds over time weaved with values, confessions and self-doubts, I kept thinking edit. How did his editor miss the multitude of run-on sentences turned paragraphs that hindered the read? Also missed was the muddy narrative of Kincaid for the majority of the book, and suddenly Everett here and there, and Irwine's story of Vietnam,given with detailed inner thoughts though he was barely lucid. Duncan provided vivid character studies of the family of eight, but who couldn't in 640 pages. The religious family dynamics were pounded into the reader. The baseball information was interesting, but did we really need a chapter on that baseball rebel Roger Maris? Given all that, I was still pulled into this story. I laughed out loud a couple of times, the dialogue was frequently clever. I also cried a couple of times because the author made you know these people and so felt their sorrows. I have not read "The Brothers Karamazov" and feel I am missing out on some of the author's references because of it. The title, "The Brothers K", is intriguing in itself and left open to multiple interpretations. I also find it interesting that the main narrator, Kade, is the character least developed except for in the early years detailing a couple of key pieces of information. If writing it all down was to be his biggest contribution, how could he reveal so little of himself or even the reason for why he decided to relay his family's story? I feel this is an author flaw. Pare it down, clean it up, flesh out it's narrator and the novel would be 5 stars instead of 3.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

It's Got It All

This is an incredible novel. It combines some of the best features of a group of my favorite novels--A Prayer from Owen Meany (the subject matter, interesting chracters, wonderful anecdotes and twists throughout the story), Catcher in the Rye (introspective chracters looking for their way in the world and inviting the reader to join the adventure), and A River Runs Through It (the gorgeous scenery, sports and religion, and again fantastic characters). It is a long novel, but don't let that frighten you because it reads quickly and will engage you for all 640 pages and leave you wanting to learn more about the lives of the Chance family, even after following them for 30 years. As a reader you become involved in all of their lives, your emotions become tied up in their successes and failures, and they seem like real people you have known your entire life. I could ask for nothing more from a novel about a family. The books also contains excellent dialogue, a diverse and engaging set of tagents, and subtely addresses several debates (Vietnam, religion, abortion, etc.) that have dominated the past 40 years--it will keep you thinking. I can not recommend this book highly enough, I loved it, and even if you do not like baseball, religion, or politics, around which the story revolves, you will like this book.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I did not ask for this....

I walked into reading this book in the midst of completing an accelerated BSN... I was told ( that this book would would fit what I was looking for... a nightly read that allowed me to escape the intensity of medicine and enjoy baseball again... they were right... UNTIL PAGE 350.

In the middle of a story about a family, their trials, their growth, and baseball... I was slapped in the face with the authors obvious hatred of either A: our government B: our government's choices about the Vietnam war or C: he had a total writers block and chose to rip on a piece of history that no one is particularly happy with.

Not only was this a complete surprise... but since my first degree was in English and I have read so many words I have not agreed with and others I have just disliked... I was in shock when I could not read another word. I picked up my lap top and started writing.

The jump from a story narrated by an obvious character to a political speech by the author threw me and angered me. This book had the disguise of a story, novel, pass the time read (whatever you wish to call it) and rapidly turned into an angry rant by yet another "Lost soul writer"!

I wanted to like this book, I might even force myself to finish it... but as far as worth as a novel that lets you run along with each character, it in its own chapter title is a FARCE. Creative or not in these words, it was a let down. And I am now back to where I started... trying to find a book that does not dive nor strive for individuality, yet earns the honor by being written in pure honesty of the story itself... a loss of author and a true becoming of the character.

It had hopes but in the end... K.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Eerily resonant.

Throughout the three weeks I spent with David James Duncan's Chase family, I found myself emailing quotes from The Brothers K and recommending this book to friends and business colleagues alike. Though written in 1992, it feels so like today in its approach to religious fanaticism, war, and politics. It's time for this book to enjoy a much deserved revival. By turns hilarious and heart-wrenching, often philosphical and meandering to distraction, one finds at conclusion that it was all there for a reason. The paths that wind through baseball, religion, politics, and family relationships all converge into a most satisying whole. Truly one of the most thoroughly enjoyable reads of my life.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

More than a baseball novel

I am a huge baseball fan, and was looking for a novel set against that kind of backdrop. I saw so many great reviews for this book that I decided to give it a try. Not only was I not disappointed, it became one of my favorite books. I recently lent it to my dad, and he thought David James Duncan was one of the best authors he'd ever read. The best part about this book was the way the subect of religion was tackled. It's a story of a huge family where the mother is a devout Christian. the father is very religious too, but his religion is baseball. The book tells the story of the children who grow up in this chaotic world where the answers aren't as simple as a sincere prayer or a great breaking ball. Or is it? Pick up this book and even if you hate baseball you will love this book.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Unoriginal

What originally attracted me to this novel was a former high school classmate of mine stating that it was one of his favorite books. Being the curious individual I was, I went on Amazon and read many of the 5 star review the books receives. I ordered a copy and began to peruse. Unfortunately, the book was not just below my expectations, but I wondered why so many people appreciated a novel that was filled with two dimensional characters and overflowing with cliches that are static in almost every piece of pop culture that is set in 60's-70's nostaglia (family is divided on present political issues, one son becomes a hippy, one becomes a soldier, etc.). Clearly David Duncan had a message, but it is one that has been heard repeatedly.
8 people found this helpful