The Barbarous Years: The Peopling of British North America--The Conflict of Civilizations, 1600-1675
The Barbarous Years: The Peopling of British North America--The Conflict of Civilizations, 1600-1675 book cover

The Barbarous Years: The Peopling of British North America--The Conflict of Civilizations, 1600-1675

Paperback – Illustrated, August 13, 2013

Price
$18.95
Format
Paperback
Pages
640
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0375703461
Dimensions
6.11 x 1.45 x 9.2 inches
Weight
1.51 pounds

Description

“Bailyn spares no gory detail, but he treats his subjects with sympathy.” — The New Yorker “ The Barbarous Years , the long-awaited companion to Voyagers to the West , is an even greater achievement. . . . Both in the span of time he examines (the years 1600 to 1675) and in his effort to capture the full range of ‘the conflict of civilizations’ in the early European colonization of North America, The Barbarous Years is Bailyn’s most ambitious book.” — The Daily Beast “Bailyn’s extensive skills at demography, material history, and ideological history are on full display.” — The Wilson Quarterly “ Barbarous Years [is] a cornucopia of human folly, mischief and intrigue.” — The Washington Independent Review of Books “Bailyn has given readers a bracing, unvarnished account of a century that determined what would follow.” — Richmond Times-Dispatch “Throughout the book, Mr. Bailyn patiently explains the origins of the people who migrated to America. Readers learn which regions of England, the Netherlands and Scandinavia produced the most migrants, which social classes were best represented, and the extent to which young males predominated within various migrant flows.” — The Wall Street Journal “Magisterial. . . . Popular histories often gentrify these early events, but Bailyn’s gripping, detailed, often squirm-inducing account makes it abundantly clear how ungenteel they actually were.” — Kirkus Reviews “Drawing on decades of sound, dynamic research, the author has provided scholars and general readers alike with an insightful and engaging account of Colonial America that signals a reset on Colonial studies, the culmination of his work. An important book. . . . Superbly told.” — Library Journal (starred review)“In Bailyn’s perceptive and erudite hands, the original British, Dutch, and Swedish ventures assume as wild and variegated guises as did the forceful individuals who embarked on them.” — Booklist Bernard Bailyn did his undergraduate work at Williams College and his graduate work at Harvard, where he is currently Adams University Professor and James Duncan Phillips Professor of Early American History Emeritus. His previous books include The New England Merchants in the Seventeenth Century ; Education in the Forming of American Society ; The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution , which received the Pulitzer and Bancroft prizes; The Ordeal of Thomas Hutchinson , which won the National Book Award for History; Voyagers to the West , which won the Pulitzer Prize; Faces of Revolution: Personalities and Themes in the Struggle for American Independence ; To Begin the World Anew: The Genius and Ambiguities of the American Founders ; and Atlantic History: Concept and Contours . In 2011 he received the National Humanities Medal. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. chapter 1The Americans1They lived crowded lives. Few in number by modern demographic standards, even before European diseases tore through their villages like the wrath of God, their world was multitudinous, densely populated by active, sentient, and sensitive spirxadits, spirits with consciences, memories, and purposes, that surrounded them, instructed them, impinged on their lives at every turn. No less real for being invisible, these vital spirits inhered in the heavens, the earth, the seas, and everything within. They drove the stars in the sky and gave life and sensibility to every bird, animal, and person that existed, and they were active within the earth’s xadmaterials—xadrocks, hills, lakes, and rivers—and in the wind, the cold, the heat, and the seasons.These purposeful, powerful spiritual forces that crowded the Indians’ world required respect; care had to be taken not to offend them. One must act pruxaddently, obey ancient precepts, learn complex prescriptions, and take advice from the gracious and sage. There were right ways and wrong ways. There were xadlife-xadgiving empowerments and tangles of prohibitions. When the rules were broken, people suffered.The earth’s generosity, on which survival depended, could be jealously withheld. Profligacy, waste, irreverence could offend. Though a community’s life depended on the success of the hunt, one might not slaughter animals recklessly. They too were protected by patron spirits, by “elder brothers,” by soul spirits of their kind capable of retribution for insults and wanton killings; they too had rights to life and, properly, only limited reasons for dying. Hunting therefore had its rituals: was in itself a form of ritual—xada religious, at times a mystic, rite essential not only for survival but also for the maintenance of order and balance in the world. So the Micmacs in Nova Scotia, out of respect for their prey, strove to prevent any drop of beaver blood from falling on the ground, and when that animal’s flesh was boiled into soup, they were careful never to allow the broth to drip into the fire. They refused to eat the embryos of moose for fear of their mothers’ retribution. Bones had to be disposed of with care. To treat these remains crudely, to throw them to the dogs or toss them about randomly, would offend the animals’ kin and their presiding spirits, who would thereafter prevent their easy capture. So too the creative spirits, who watched jealously over the success of procreation, might resent the punishment of children and remove them from human hands; children were treated indulgently.Since the myriad, immanent spirits were everywhere alert, everywhere sensitive and reactive, the whole of life was a spiritual enterprise, and the rules of behavior had to be finely drawn. Propitiating the anima of beavers, who were greatly respected, was especially demanding, and there were significant distinctions: those that were trapped had to be treated differxadently from those that were otherwise killed. There were special rules for dealing with birds and animals caught in nets; the sex of captured animals mattered in their treatment. Respectful of the animals’ spirits, Penobscot hunters would not eat the first deer or moose they killed each season, the Chipaways in the north offered up to ritual the first fish caught in a new net, and Eastern Abenaki boys had to give away their first kill, however small. And everywhere great attention had to be given to the ways that bears, patrician animals, were killed and consumed. Before or after bears were slain (it made no difference which, since in either case their spirits were alive), they had to be addressed with ceremonial honor and with apologies for the necessity of killing them; their carcasses had to be disposed of reverentially.In this xadmagico-xadanimist world taboos abounded. To obey them would minimize offenses and so help maintain stability; to violate them would lead to disaster. The possible effects of women’s “uncleanliness” and their procreative processes had to be strenuously controlled. When menstruating, Micmac women were not allowed to eat the flesh of beavers, whose spirits would be insulted, nor drink out of common kettles. Huron women, when pregnant, were excluded from the area of the hunt since they would frustrate the capture of any animals they happened to glance at. And childless women were banished when bear meat was being brought in and consumed.The universe in all its elements, animate and inanimate, was suffused with spiritual xadpotency—xadmanitou, the Algonquian peoples called xadit—xadthat empowered each entity to function in its disxadtinctive way and that embraced all of xadlife’s diversity in an ultimately unified and comprehensive state of being. Children, Calvin Martin writes, were taught “that nothing was profane.” There were few gradations in value or levels of superiority among animate things; nor were any species truly alien or any objects completely insensate. Animals no less than men belonged to “nations,” lived in communal dwellings, conferred together sociably, danced and played together, fought in familiarly human ways, and acted in everything they did according to rules and precepts no less judicious and spiritually xadself-xadprotective than those that shaped the behavior of men. The dignity of trees had to be acknowledged when they were felled, sometimes by sprinkling tobacco, which had peculiar powers, on the ground around them. The west xadwind—xadthe xadseasons—xadthunder—xadtoo had purposes.In such a world, reciprocity was the key to stability, to happiness, in the end to survival. Injuries had to be requited, insults repaid, losses recovered. Raids were launched, wars were fought, over the failure of reciprocal trade, and to capture prisoners who might replace deaths or abductions incurred in previous conflicts (“mourning wars”) and to restore lost dignity and pride. Body xadparts—xadsevered heads or xadhands—xadof warriors who had fought improperly might be offered to victims’ families to maintain the stability of tribal relations. Village life and political alliances were based on reciprocity: the fear of supernatxadural retribution was in itself a form of social control. Productive land had to be left fallow to recover the nourishment of which it had been robbed; rich fishing grounds had to be vacated to prevent irreversible depletion; girls given in marriage had somehow to be replaced, by compensation to a woman’s family “for the loss of her valuable labor and xadchild-xadbearing potential.”But reciprocity, the maintenance of equilibrium, the restoration of xadbalance—xadamong people, between people and their environment, and among the elemental forces of xadlife—xadwas a complex process, full of mysteries that people struggled to comprehend. When the world went xadwrong—xadwhen there were droughts, epidemics, unaccountable wars, frustrated xadhunts—xadfamiliar remedies could be resorted to: xadwell-xadknown rituals, sanctioned patterns of xadself-xadabasement and xadself-xaddenial, symbolic gestures, cunning exhortations. But often the sources of disturbance, of the insults to the system, were hidden; only direct communication with the ultimate powers could help, and that was the work of experts: doctors of esoteric lore and divination, shamans, magi, sorcerers.The shamans, authoritative cosmologists and custodians of the myths of creation, could make personal contact with the immanent powers, penetrate the mysteries of lost balances, identify forgotten violations of taboo or offenses that demanded apologies, and recommend the proper forms of recovery. They could even diagnose the ultimate causes of physical illnesses that defied herbal cures, and find remedies in magical chants, amulets, rattles, and sucking procedures that rid the body of the disbalancing, destructive spirit. For they, above all others, knew that physical nature was only part of the great universe whose ultimate forces were spiritual. So in these emergencies, the shamans, the powwows, the sorcerers and soothsayers transcended xadphysicality—xadin trances, by hallucinogenic drugs, by hypnotic, xadmind-xadblinding incantations, perhaps in epileptic xadseizures—xadin order to penetrate the deeper recesses of being and connect with spiritual sources. They emerged from these encounters with mandates that could be strange, at times frightening, entailing everything from symbolic gestures and prayerful dances to warfare, torture, and cannibalism.But ordinary people too had an avenue of direct access to the controlxadling anima, though it was an erratic, at times perplexing route requiring imaginative xadinterpretation—xadthrough dreams.Centuries would pass before European civilization would match the Indians’ understanding of the importance of dreams. They were not seen as random, superficial ephemera that expired with the light of day, but as cold reality, profoundly meaningful experiences that had to be understood. The Hurons and Senecas, a Jesuit reported in i649, believed that, quite beyond one’s conscious wishes,our souls have other desires, which are, as it were, inborn and concealed. These, they say, come from the depths of the soul, not through any knowledge, but by means of a certain blind transporting of the soul to certain objects; these transports might, in the language of philosophy, be called desideria innata, to distinguish them from the former, which are called desideria elicita. Now they believe that our soul makes these natural desires known by means of dreams, which are its language. Accordingly, when these desires are accomplished, it is satisfied; butu2008.u2008.u2008.u2008if it be not granted what it desires, it becomes angryu2008.u2008.u2008.u2008[and] often itu2008.u2008.u2008.u2008revolts against the body, causing various diseases, and even death.Dreams were probes of ultimate realities, and anticipations of the future. Correctly understood they could guide one’s behavior into safe channels, prevent disasters to oneself or to one’s people, and ease anxieties that could not be consciously acknowledged.Dreams as portents made demands. To ease one’s latent troubles, to satisfy one’s guiding spirit, or to anticipate some approaching disaster, a dream might clearly require one to do things that appeared bizarre but that were logical in the greater system of which the palpable world was only a part. A dream might oblige one to find sexual gratification with two married women; to sacrifice ten dogs; to burn down one’s cabin; even to cut off one’s finger with a sea shell, to fulfill symbolically a nightmare dream of torture. The worst nightmares were experienced by the young, groping apprehensively for maturity; by warriors, who knew that capture in warfare often ended in torture; and by the old, facing sickness and xaddeath—xadfrom all of whom society demanded fortitude and stoic endurance. A warrior who dreamed of being burned alive by his captors had his people singe him repeatedly with torches, but then, hoping that a symbol might substitute for his agonies and life, killed a dog, roasted it, and ate it in a public feast in the way sacrificed enemies might be eaten. Another, xaddriven to accomplish a dream of captivity, had himself stripped naked, dragged through his own village, ridiculed and reviled, and tied up for execution; but then, having sung his death song, he stopped, hoping that this proximate enactment would be acceptable as suffering enough.Sometimes, however, the true meanings and mandates of dreams were not obvious, but hidden, lying deep beneath manifest appearances. Expert xadanalysts—xadthe xadshamans—xadwould be called in to penetrate the mysteries and prescribe the right courses of action. But not only the shamans: village elders, concerned for the fate of their people, might join in the search for a dream’s meaning. There were even rites by which a whole community might gather to probe the riddle of an individual’s mysterious dream, combining forces to discover its meaning and the correct, the relieving, course of action.Dreams could be deeply disturbing, upsetting the balance of life by their portents and the demands they made. But for people crowded and jostled by exigent spirits, xadstability—xadpsychological as well as xadsocial—xadwas in any case a fragile achievement. The psychoxadlogical pressures, especially on men, could be intense. They were expected to be proud, courageous, resourceful, independent, defiant in the face of savage adversity, and at the same time devout in their reverence for the animating forces of the world and for their personal guardian spirits. Above all, they were hunters and warriors, and they were expected to excel as both. It was not merely courage that was required in hunting and warfare but reckxadless courage, heedless courage. Danger was not to be feared and evaded, but sought: it provided the ultimate tests of manhood. So their vivid war paint, whose color and design conveyed specific xadmeanings—xadbrilliant daubs of red for xadbattles—xadwas meant to startle the enemy, intimidate him, and weaken his confidence, but it also had the effect of heightening a warrior’s visibility and declaring his fearlessness and his disdain for danger.A man who failed conspicuously as a xadhunter—xadwhose technical skills were inadequate, whose nerve gave way at a crucial moment, who lacked the stamina for xadmonth-xadlong searches in snow and xadice—xadwould be shamed, publicly disgraced, his humiliation destructive of status and of economic, even marital, prosperity. Against such outcomes they were trained from early childhood. As boys they were carefully instructed in the skills and fortitude of hunters and warriors, and their courage was tested in puberty rites. In some regions these passages from childhood were vague in structure, mild and diffused, though they usually involved some form of ritual xadself-xadabasement to invoke one’s guardian spirit, whose presence would ever thereafter be represented in the pouch of charms one carried with one. In other regions, however, puberty rites were rigorous and severe. Nothing could be more demanding than the Powhatans’ huskanaw, a process required of adolescent sons of leading families that could last for several months and was calculated to be so physically devastating as to wipe out all memory of earlier life, with its emotional ties of dependence. Some did not survive the ordeal of beatings, starvation, xaddrug-xadinduced bouts of madness, confinement in narrow xad“sugar-xadloaf” cages, and the tortuous recovery through contrived setbacks. Among those who, at the end of it all, failed to show the expected marks of total transformation and were made to repeat the procedure, death was not uncommon. So Europeans who heard vaguely of the ordeal, but who never actually witnessed or understood the whole of it, concluded that the natives indulged in human sacrifices to the feared god of evil, punishment, and power, Okse.The Powhatans’ huskanaw initiated males into a crowded, delicately balanced, and perilous world, the stability of which might easily be upset and which might end in the devastation of military defeat. That ultimate threat was always there, even among such peaceful peoples as the horticulturists and fishing folk of New xadEnxadgland. Among the Powhatans of the Virginian plain, battling furiously against or as allies of a xadwould-xadbe native overlord, and among the aggressive Iroquois and their Huron and Algonquian victims in upcountry New York and the eastern Great Lakes, warfare, with all its personal horrors, was commonplace. Raiding parties, seeking revenge, tribute, or restitution, devastated whole villagxades, pillaging stores of food, destroying crops and habitations, butchering the wounded, and carrying off the women, children, and defeated warriors. The women and children who survived were often adopted as replacements for the victors’ recently deceased kinfolk, but the captured warriors were brought home as trophies, along with severed hands, feet, and heads. Beaten continuously, the prisoners were often xadmaimed—xadfingers chopped or bitten off to incapacitate them for further warfare, backs and shoulders xadslashed—xadthen systematically tortured, by women gashing their bodies and tearing off strips of flesh, by children scorching the most sensitive parts of their immobilized bodies with xadred-xadhot xadcoals—xadwhile judgment was passed on whether they would live as dependents, in effect as slaves, or die. If spared, their lives as slaves involved brutal humiliation, complete repudiation of their former lives, and changes of name. While they might eventually rise to prominence in their new society, they were seldom free of the stigma of subjection. If condemned, they would most likely be burned to death after disembowelment, some parts of their bodies having been eaten and their blood drunk in celebration by their captors. This was the ultimate test, for which warriors had fearfully prepared. But it was not so much death they feared as shameful death, a cringing, pitiful death in which one begged for life. Those who died properly were those who withstood the agony not only uncomplainingly but defiantly, mocking, singing, laughing at their torturers until the end. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Finalist for the Pulitzer PrizeA compelling, fresh account of the first great transit of people from Britain, Europe, and Africa to British North America, their involvements with each other, and their struggles with the indigenous peoples of the eastern seaboard.
  • The immigrants were a mixed multitude. They came from England, the Netherlands, the German and Italian states, France, Africa, Sweden, and Finland, and they moved to the western hemisphere for different reasons, from different social backgrounds and cultures. They represented a spectrum of religious attachments. In the early years, their stories are not mainly of triumph but of confusion, failure, violence, and the loss of civility as they sought to normalize situations and recapture lost worlds. It was a thoroughly brutal encounter—not only between the Europeans and native peoples and between Europeans and Africans, but among Europeans themselves, as they sought to control and prosper in the new configurations of life that were emerging around them.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(114)
★★★★
25%
(95)
★★★
15%
(57)
★★
7%
(27)
23%
(87)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Interesting, but a little scattershot (3.75*s)

One thing is for certain, in this highly detailed work by the author, there is no attempt to sugarcoat the European experience in emigrating to America in the 17th century. He examines Virginia, the Chesapeake area, New York, and New England. In the initial stages merely surviving was an accomplishment. Most of the early settlers were clueless about overcoming the harsh conditions that they found, not to mention the savagery that the natives unleashed upon them without warning. A large supply of the weak and vulnerable facilitated this peopling of America, despite the dreadful conditions.

In addition, as the author shows in great detail, are the conflicts among the settlers. America was settled during a time of great political and religious clashes in England. Most of the settlers were Protestants, but held widely differing, contentious views about religious practice. Much of the governance of the colonies was autocratic, inept, and harsh. A good many of the settlers were indentured by contract for years and thereby were practically slaves, in contrast to the well connected who were granted huge estates. But even then, the author points out that the living standards for even the rich were terrible by European standards.

The book is definitely more sociology than historical. One learns about the origins of the settlers across America and the implications for the possibility of robust communities. The author definitely does not hold back on naming thousands of settlers across the colonies; it is difficult to slog through all of that. The book does seem a little scattershot in its organization and subject matter.
35 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Barbarous Years

.
"The Barbarous Years " is a book any serious historian probably should have on his or her shelf. However, I am wondering if Bernard Bailyn actually wrote this book or if he merely approved the work of a graduate assistant,allowing his own name be put on the cover.

There are some astounding errors in this book. For example, on page 308 Bailyn talks about Jacob Alrichs, who "settled in Fort Christina, now renamed Altona..." This is wrong information. Fort Christina/Altena was the Swedish colony taken over by the Dutch West India Company. Alrichs was never its director. The text should read, "Jacob Alrichs settled in Fort Casimir, now renamed New Amstel." New Amstel was the City of Amsterdam's Colony and Jacob Alrich was its head.

Sentences that sound like transcriptions of taped lectures don't help: "In addition he had fined one Anders the Finn a parcel of rye and other essential goods, the lack of which would probably result in the man's death from starvation and that of his wife and children."

Although I am not in love with this book, it offers some interesting insights into seventeenth century North American history. Definitely not Bailyn's best book.

Kim Burdick
Stanton, Delaware
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Middling

I feel a little silly writing a 3-star review of a book written by Bernard Bailyn, who is one of the most accomplished living American historians. But.... this book had some undeniably odd aspects that detract from the overall quality. I will discuss a few of them. First, the book opens with a chapter describing life as a Native American (NA), in particular from a psychological standpoint. While beautifully written, and conveying some good information, the chapter was also nearly cringe-worthy. Bailyn's psychological analysis was clearly conducted from a Euro/Western mindset- how a white European would think about, feel about, react to things. NAs existed within a completely different framework, having markedly different beliefs regarding spirituality, conflict, possessions, etc. To assume that they would regard and react to a given situation in the same way that a European would is absurd. To be clear, Bailyn never says that he is evaluating the NAs from a Euro-centric standpoint, but he absolutely is.

Bailyn fails to place the "barbarous years" in the new world within the context of the greater world. That failure, along with the title itself, make it seem as if relations between the settlers and the NAs were unusually brutal. But they weren't. The 1600's were incredibly barbarous (by modern Western standards) throughout the world. The conflicts within the new world were nothing unusual.

An exhaustive history and a readable history are not necessarily the same thing. This book is very well researched. And it is well-written. But by the time about two-thirds of the book have passed, when the chapter about the conflicts between the NAs and the Swedes appears, the endless litany of conflict becomes extremely repetitive. Again, this is a good history for research purposes. But it becomes a bit of a slog at that point.

I will conclude with one omission that is so glaring, that I still haven't wrapped my head around Bailyn's failure to mention it. In Plymouth colony, the conflict between the NAs and the settlers in the early years was minimal compared to other areas. (Yes, of course, there was some conflict. Some atrocities occurred on both sides. But overall the interaction was far, far more peaceful than in almost any other area, and for decades.) There is a clear and distinct reason for this. Governor William Bradford and Chief Massasoit (of the Wampanoags) developed a strong and lasting mutual respect and trust. Thanks to these two extraordinary men, many fewer of their people died violently than occurred among other groups in other locations. Their relationship lasted for nearly 40 years, ending only with the death of Bradford in the late 1650's. And it was only after Massasoit's death a decade or so later that the bloody and, yes, barbarous King Philip's War broke out. (Philip was Massasoit's son.) The problem? Bailyn NEVER mentions this relationship or its effect of (relative) peace. Not once. Plymouth is mentioned, Bradford is mentioned. But Bailyn NEVER mentions that Massasoit even existed. His name is not written once. Inexplicable. It is almost as if the Plymouth/Wampanoag situation was ignored because it didn't align with the book's title and thesis. I might expect this omission from a quasi-historian. But from Bailyn? I am stunned. And the glaring omission makes me wonder what other information might have been ignored.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Shows the Two Original Sins of American Civilization

Bailyn is a distinguished scholar and the leading historian on Colonial America. He gives a fresh view of the first 75 years of European settlement of North America, emphasizing the complete incompatibility of European and Native American civilization -- and the ugly race war that ensued between them. In an absolutely brilliant touch, he leads off with a sketch of Native American culture and society -- and then sketches, on equal footing, the European culture and society of the time. Despite all the European condescension to the Native Americans, the Europeans hardly seem to be a more advanced civilization. They are in many respects still mired in the Middle Ages. In many ways the Native American technologies are better suited to the land, and despite the European comparative advantage in primitive industry and gun technology, there is reason to think that the Native Americans, if united and ruthless and quick, should have won the race war.

The major difference between the two civilizations was that the Native Americans did not have a conception of private property and were a more communal culture. The European acquisitiveness and worship of private property did give them the impetus to push the settlement of the continent and to fight the race war well. There was no hope for coexistence between the two cultures. One had to win, and one had to lose. The Native Americans were too divided to win and did not realize the mortal danger to their culture until it was too late to mobilize an all-out assault.

Bailyn does not romanticize the Native American culture. This is not a Disney movie. The Native Americans did embrace violence and torture, and they were plagued by internecine conflicts and wars. And at times they could fight the race war as dirty as the Europeans, who used poison, disease, and sneak attacks to their advantage.

The first wave of European settlers were a rough bunch. Only a certain type of ruthless and ambitious man, frustrated by the lack of a path of success in England, would go over. The second wave consisted of many families and religious groups, who provided a more stable culture and who began to reproduce in numbers that ultimately overwhelmed the Native Americans. In the process they re-fought on the new continent the religious battles of England, though they began to embrace notions of freedom of religious that came to define the American nation.

The third wave of settlement, toward the end of the century, was African slavery. By that time, it began to be profitable to deploy slave labor. In the 18th Century, 15 million Africans were rounded up and shipped to various points in the Western hemisphere (5 million died in shipment, constituting the first holocaust of human history). Slavery increasingly began to define the American nation. Given the imperatives of the profit motive and the enormous value of deploying scarce labor in a land of plenty, perhaps this was inevitable. But it was not chosen until after the period discussed by Bailyn.

Our early history is truly barbarous and nothing to be very proud of. It was characterized by the first original sin of wiping out Native American cultures -- and then by the later sin of African slavery. It is an ugly story, bearing no resemblance to schoolbook stories of Jamestown and the Pilgrims.

Much of Bailyn's narrative is ponderous, meandering, and deadly dull. But his research and scholarship are extraordinary in setting forth the two original sins of the United States
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

UNDERSTANDING THE COLONIAL POPULATING OF THE NEW WORLD. AN ACADEMIC WORK.

Pulitzer Prize winning author Bernard Bailyn writing The Barbarous Years opens a sweeping and authoritative discourse into the peopling of North American between 1600 and 1675. From Jamestown, Virginia to Plymouth and the Massachusetts Bay Colony, who were these individuals who braved three plus months voyages on small, crowded and disease infested ships to arrive at the edge of the American wilderness? You will learn not only who they were but why some succeeded while others were destined to fail.

images

No one needs tout Bailey's credentials as historian and researcher. He is brilliant. However, what is most remarkable is his ability to keep the subject flowing, fascinating and understandable for the lay reader. Bailyn delivers in brilliant digital display the complexity and challenges of the people responsible for the early settlement of North America.

Think of this:

Why did the Jamestown fail numerous times?

Why did the Catholics establish a foothold in Maryland and the Finns and Swedes in Delaware?

Why did The Massachusetts Bay Colony begin to work from day one.? Was it religious fervor or the composition of the settlers themselves?

What role did the varied Native American tribes play in the success or failure of early settlement.

How did the Pilgrims differ from the Puritans and the aforementioned from the Quakers and the Dutch?

Were indentured servants a precursor to slavery?

Winthrop, Bradford ,Stuyvesant, Keift, Underhill, King Philips War.

The Barbarous Years that marked the original settling of America is a most accurate title for the book. Adventurers, scoundrels, orphans, preachers, doctors, lawyers, Native Americans, politicians, merchants and perhaps most important, the hundreds of unnamed families with children who came to America during the Great Migration of the 1630s , bringing with them the skills and the ethic to permanently settle on the land.

The " New World" was British North America during its early settlement but Bailyn clearly identifies the complexity of cultures, trade and geography that would eventually become America. The Barbarous Years is a fabulous foundation for understanding colonial America's formative years. Also by Bernard Bailyn: The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, The Ordeal of Thomas Hutchinson, and Voyages to the West, which won a Pulitzer.

A wonderful different perspective of the settlement of the Massachusetts Bay Colony comes from reading Anya Seton's historical novel Winthrop Women. A second suggestion is Philbrick's book Mayflower. Search Gordonsgoodreads.com for overviews of both.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Hard read, but what I wanted..

I read books like The Barbarous Years to learn something. I guess you could say there is some entertainment for me, since I chose to read the book.
It was a difficult read. I had to drag out the dictionary a few times.
I was not familiar with some of the people and religious groups he talks about.
So, I had to do a few aside learning.

Bailyn does a good job of interweaving the various threads into the theme.
He discusses the different cultures, religions, and characters that are the history of the 75 year time period. He touches on the Native Americans without going into a lot of detail, just enough to show how they influenced the colonies. He even tells us why he used barbarous in the title.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The American History that you were not taught in school

Bernard Bailyn is an excellent writer. In this book he tells a history of the settlers in north America that you may find shocking and disturbing in how it differs from what you were taught in school. Every page is a revelation. Highly recommended.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Very good history but writing style needs improvement

This is an excellent historical review of the early colonial years 1600-1675. It's very complete and detailed, sometimes too detailed. I'm only giving it 3 stars because of the writing style. The author doesn't know how to write concisely which was often aggravating. He evidently never read Strunk and White. Why write a few concise sentences to make a point when instead you can write one run-on sentence that has 6 different clauses and is a paragraph long? By the end of the sentence, you may have forgotten how the sentence started and have to read it again.

That being said, I'm glad that I read the book in that it gave me many new insights into the history of this period.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Research behind the words.

2nd book I purchased after his " voyages to the west" This book was hard because it exposed all the brutalitys we'd rather not think about. As inconceivable and disturbing as it was to me, I could not put it down. I binged read over 600 pages. My burning question was how, why, could all this happen and.... How come I didn't know more about this sooner? I knew alot, the basics. The details were repulsive. Again however Bernard Bailey brought to life a time an era of history with all its horrific truths. Reading his work ,for me, is like watching it on film. But All good reads are watching a movie! Excellent, fantastic, Educational and well researched.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Legacy of Conquest

Bailyn is one of a few who can weave a complex social history into a digestible whole.

First Effective Settlement has a long shelf life. If you believe we’ve evolved beyond the 17th century, think about the parallels today as a third of the society seeks to roll back the Enlightenment. When America runs out of enemies without, we must find an enemy within and destroy it. A nihilistic annihilation is our destiny.
1 people found this helpful