Solar
Solar book cover

Solar

Hardcover – Deckle Edge, March 30, 2010

Price
$14.80
Format
Hardcover
Pages
304
Publisher
Nan A. Talese
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385533416
Dimensions
6.56 x 1.06 x 9.56 inches
Weight
1.28 pounds

Description

From Bookmarks Magazine Critics expressed decidedly mixed opinions about McEwan's latest work--and perhaps it's no surprise that he was better-reviewed on his UK home front. While most critics on either side of the pond praised the author's intelligent plot (especially his command of science) and ample storytelling gifts, the majority agreed that Solar is not his best novel to date. A few commented that the several narrative strands, which take place over more than a decade, do not cohere; Beard's jaunt to the North Pole, for example is interesting but tangential. Tired jokes, a rushed climax, and Beard's own piggish character felt claustrophobic to others. But most contentious of all was the satirical, comic tone superimposed on the very serious subject of climate change. Though Solar is a worthy inquiry into truth, morality, and the future of humanity, some critics could not get past McEwan's approach. From Booklist Customarily, McEwan’s novels spring from a catastrophic incident in someone’s life, either a calamity that causes physical distress or a psychological trespass that causes emotional instability. For instance, in Enduring Love (1998), a man plunges to his death from a balloon, and in the aftermath, one witness continues to menace another witness. On Chesil Beach (2007) centers on an emotionally devastating wedding night. In his new novel, McEwan outdoes himself in terms of catastrophic occurrences. The protagonist, physicist Michael Beard, won a Nobel Prize several years ago and has been resting on his laurels ever since. A serial cheater, he is now married to his fifth wife, who leads a totally separate life, indicating her complete disdain for his wandering eye. His lack of effort in applying himself to either career or fidelity only increases our dislike of him. Even he says of himself, “No one loved him.” An accidental death in which he was involved and which he covered up, a politically incorrect statement aired before a professional audience, and his usurpation of the research of a deceased colleague: readers are taxed to even care about these crises. This draggy novel stands in stark contrast to its many beautiful predecessors, but McEwan is regarded as a major contemporary British novelist, so expect demand on that basis. --Brad Hooper "McEwan's background research is so seamlessly displayed that scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology — busy working on the same topic — might wonder if he's nicked their notes. But where Solar really succeeds — beyond the dark comedy. . .— is the author's ability to reveal the nature of the climate conundrum in the very human life of his protagonist."— TIME "A comedy every bit as brilliant as its title might suggest ... Blazing with imaginative and intellectual energy, Solar is a stellar performance."— Sunday Times “A stunningly accomplished work, possibly [McEwan’s] best yet.”— Financial Times “Beard is as robust and full-fleshed and ebullient a character as McEwan has come up with. And in Solar , he shows a side to himself as a writer — a puckishness, a broadness of humour, an extravagance of style — that we haven’t seen before.”— The Spectator "Blending domestic satire with scientific inquiry, [ Solar ] nods to concerns both personal and planetary in a tone that is at once ironic and heartfelt. It is exquisitely and defiantly McEwan-esque. Accept no imitations."— Mail on Sunday Praise for On Chesil Beach “Heartbreaking . . . Breathtaking . . . McEwan’s prose is as masterly as ever, here striking a remarkably subtle balance between detachment and sympathy, dry wit and deep compassion. It reaffirms my conviction that no one now writing in English surpasses or even matches McEwan’s accomplishment.”—Jonathan Yardley, Washington Post Book World “Marvelously realized . . . Wrenching, funny, smart, and hugely gratifying in unexpected ways . . . On Chesil Beach is as merciful to its characters as it is merciless in its heartache.”— Boston Globe “Remarkable, engaging and gripping . . . On Chesil Beach is not only a wonderful read but also perhaps that rarest of things: a perfect novel.”— San Francisco Chronicle “[McEwan’s] finely honed prose is a deep pleasure to experience.”— Chicago Sun-Times “Completely absorbing . . . Infused with a bitter poignancy . . . Intense and powerful . . . A masterpiece.”— Philadelphia Inquirer “Dazzling . . . McEwan treats [his subject] with a boundless sympathy, one that enlists the reader even as it disguises the fact that this seeming novel of manners is as fundamentally a horror novel as any [he’s] written.”—Jonathan Lethem, New York Times Book Review IAN McEWAN is the bestselling author of thirteen books, including the novels On Chesil Beach ; Saturda y; Atonement , winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award and the W. H. Smith Literary Award; The Comfort of Strangers and Black Dogs , both shortlisted for the Booker Prize; Amsterdam , winner of the Booker Prize; and The Child in Time , winner of the Whitbread Award; as well as the story collections First Love, Last Rites , winner of the Somerset Maugham Award; and In Between the Sheets . He lives in London. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. He belonged to that class of men—vaguely unprepossessing, often bald, short, fat, clever—who were unaccountably attractive to certain beautiful women. Or he believed he was, and thinking seemed to make it so. And it helped that some women believed he was a genius in need of rescue. But the Michael Beard of this time was a man of narrowed mental condition, anhedonic, monothematic, stricken. His fifth marriage was disintegrating, and he should have known how to behave, how to take the long view, how to take the blame. Weren’t marriages, his marriages, tidal, with one rolling out just before another rolled in? But this one was different. He did not know how to behave, long views pained him, and for once there was no blame for him to assume, as he saw it. It was his wife who was havxading the affair, and having it flagrantly, punitively, certainly without remorse. He was discovering in himself, among an array of emoxadtions, intense moments of shame and longing. Patrice was seeing a builder, their builder, the one who had repointed their house, fitted their kitchen, retiled their bathroom, the very same heavyset fellow who in a tea break had once shown Michael a photo of hisxa0 mock-Tudor house, renovated and tudorized by his own hand, with a boat on a trailer under a Victorian-style lamppost on the concreted front driveway, and space on which to erect a decommissioned red phone box. Beard was surprised to find how complicated it was to be the cuckold. Misery was not simple. Let no one say that this late in life he was immune to fresh experience.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 He had it coming. His four previous wives, Maisie, Ruth, Eleanor, Karen, who all still took a distant interest in his life, would have been exultant, and he hoped they would not be told. None of his marxadriages had lasted more than six years, and it was an achievement of sorts to have remained childless. His wives had discovered early on what a poor or frightening prospect of a father he presented, and they had protected themselves and got out. He liked to think that if he had caused unhappiness, it was never for long, and it counted for somexadthing that he was still on speaking terms with all his exes.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 But not with his current wife. In better times, he might have prexaddicted for himself a manly embrace of double standards, with bouts of dangerous fury, perhaps an episode of drunken roaring in the back garden late at night, or writing off her car, and the calculated pursuit of a younger woman, a Samson-like toppling of the marital temple. Instead he was paralyzed by shame, by the extent of his humiliation. Even worse, he amazed himself with his inconvenient longing for her. These days, desire for Patrice came on him out of nowhere, like an attack of stomach cramp. He would have to sit somewhere alone and wait for it to pass. Apparently there was a certain kind of husband who thrilled at the notion of his wife with other men. Such a man might arrange to have himself bound and gagged and locked in the bedroom wardrobe while ten feet away his better half went at it. Had Beard at last located within himself a capacity for sexual masochism?xa0No woman had ever looked or sounded so desirable as the wife he suddenly could not have. Conspicuously, he went to Lisbon to look up an old friend, but it was a joyless three nights. He had to have his wife back, and dared not drive her away with shouting or threats or brilliant moments of unreason. Nor was it in his nature to plead. He was frozen, he was abject, he could think of nothing else. The first time she left him a note— Staying over at R’s tonight. xx P— did he go round to thexa0mock-Tudorxa0ex-council semi with the shrouded speedxadboat on the hard standing and a hot tub in thexa0 pint- sized backyard to mash the man’s brains with his own monkey wrench? No, he watched television for five hours in his overcoat, drank two bottles of wine, and tried not to think. And failed.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 But thinking was all he had. When his other wives had found out about his affairs, they had raged, coldly or tearfully, they had insisted on long sessions into the early hours to deliver their thoughts on broxadken trust, and eventually their demands for a separation and all that folxadlowed. But when Patrice happened across somexa0e-mails from Suzanne Reuben, a mathematician at the Humboldt University in Berlin, she became unnaturally elated. That same afternoon she moved her clothes into the guest bedroom. It was a shock when he slid the wardrobe doors open to confirm the fact. Those rows of silk and cotton dresses, he realized now, had been a luxury and a comfort, versions of herself lining up to please him. No longer. Even the hangers were gone. She smiled through dinner that night as she explained that she too intended to be “free,” and within the week she had started her affair. What was a man to do? He apologized one breakfast, told her his lapse meant nothing, made grand promises he sincerely believed he might keep. This was the closest he came to pleading. She said she did not mind what he did. This was what she was doing—and this was when she revealed the identity of her lover, the builder with the sinxadister name of Rodney Tarpin, seven inches taller and twenty years younger than the cuckold, whose sole reading, according to his boast, back when he was humbly grouting and beveling for the Beards, was the sports section of a tabloid newspaper.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 An early sign of Beard’s distress was dysmorphia, or perhaps it was dysmorphia he was suddenly cured of. At last he knew himself for what he was. Catching sight of a conical pink mess in the misted full- length mirror as he came out of the shower, he wiped down the glass, stood full on, and took a disbelieving look. What engines ofxa0self-persuasion had let him think for so many years that looking like this was seductive? That foolish thatch of earlobe-level hair that butxadtressed his baldness, the new curtain swag of fat that hung below his armpits, the innocent stupidity of swelling in gut and rear. Once he had been able to improve on his mirror self by pinning back his shoulxadders, standing erect, tightening his abs. Now human blubber draped his efforts. How could he possibly keep hold of a young woman as beautiful as she was? Had he honestly thought that status was enough, that his Nobel Prize would keep her in his bed? Naked, he was a disxadgrace, an idiot, a weakling. Even eight consecutivexa0 push- ups were beyond him. Whereas Tarpin could run up the stairs to the Beards’ master bedroom holding under one arm a fifty-kilo cement sack. Fifty kilos? That was roughly Patrice’s weight.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 She kept him at a distance with lethal cheerfulness. These were additional insults, her singsong hellos, the matinal recital of domestic detail, and her evening whereabouts, and none of it would have matxadtered if he had been able to despise her a little and plan to be shot of her. Then they could have settled down to the brief, grisly dismanxadtling of a five-year childless marriage. Of course she was punishing him, but when he suggested that, she shrugged and said that she could just as easily have said the same of him. She had merely been waiting for this opportunity, he said, and she laughed and said that in that case she was grateful to him.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 In his delusional state, he was convinced that just as he was about to lose her, he had found the perfect wife. That summer of 2000 she was wearing different clothes, she had a different look around the house—faded tight jeans, flip-flops, a ragged pink cardigan over a T-shirt, her blond hair cut short, her pale eyes a deeper agitated blue. Her build was slight, and now she looked like a teenager. From the empty rope- handled glossy carrier bags and tissue paper left strewn on the kitchen table for his inspection, he gathered she was buying herself new underwear for Tarpin to remove. She wasxa0thirty-four, and still kept thexa0strawberries-and-cream look of her twenties. She did not tease or taunt or flirt with him—that at least would have been communication of a sort—but steadily perfected the bright indifferxadence with which she intended to obliterate him.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 He needed to cease needing her, but desire was not like that. He wanted to want her. One sultry night he lay uncovered on the bed and tried masturbating himself toward freedom. It bothered him that he could not see his genitalia unless his head was propped up on two pilxadlows, and his fantasy was continually interrupted by Tarpin, who, like some ignorant stagehand with ladder and bucket, kept wandering onto the set. Was there another man on the planet apart from Beard attempting at this moment to pleasure himself with thoughts of his own wife just thirty feet away across the landing? The question empxadtied him of purpose. And it was too hot.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 Friends used to tell him that Patrice resembled Marilyn Monroe, at least from certain angles and in a certain light. He had been happy to accept this status- enhancing comparison, but he never really saw it. Now he did. She had changed. There was a new fullness in her lower lip, a promise of trouble when she lowered her gaze, and her shortxadened hair lay curled on her nape in a compelling, old-fashioned way. Surely she was more beautiful than Monroe, drifting about the house and garden at weekends in a haze of blond and pink and pale blue. What an adolescent color scheme he had fallen for, and at his age.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 He turnedxa0 fifty- three that July, and naturally she ignored his birthday, then pretended in her jolly new style to remember it three days later. She gave him a kipper ti... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • The literary event of the season: a new novel from Ian McEwan, as surprising as it is masterful.
  • Michael Beard is a Nobel prize–winning physicist whose best work is behind him. Trading on his reputation, he speaks for enormous fees, lends his name to the letterheads of renowned scientific institutions, and half-heartedly heads a government-backed initiative tackling global warming. While he coasts along in his professional life, Michael’s personal life is another matter entirely. His fifth marriage is crumbling under the weight of his infidelities. But this time the tables are turned: His wife is having an affair, and Michael realizes he is still in love with her. When Michael’s personal and professional lives begin to intersect in unexpected ways, an opportunity presents itself in the guise of an invitation to travel to New Mexico. Here is a chance for him to extricate himself from his marital problems, reinvigorate his career, and very possibly save the world from environmental disaster. Can a man who has made a mess of his life clean up the messes of humanity? A complex novel that brilliantly traces the arc of one man’s ambitions and self-deceptions,
  • Solar
  • is a startling, witty, and stylish new work from one of the world’s great writers.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(319)
★★★★
20%
(213)
★★★
15%
(159)
★★
7%
(74)
28%
(298)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

"Someone, or everyone, would be disappointed. Nothing new there."

If you scan the large body of comments placed here, and if you track down the published reviews of major book critics, you'll find that reactions to McEwan's new novel have been -- to use a word from the lexicon of the book's physicist protagonist -- polarized. Many reviewers, especially the British establishment critics, declared "Solar" a delightful work by a master, well worth your while. Others, especially on this side of the pond, vented their disappointment, perhaps best expressed by an online critic who headlined his review: "A Flabby Character Portrait."

With the verdict on the book's merits a split decision, it doesn't seem useful simply to add to the chorus of contradictory conclusions ("Yes, it's brilliant!" "No, it's a waste of your time!"). Instead, let me offer some guidelines for you to consider if you're thinking of reading "Solar."

- Are you expecting an experience comparable to McEwan's recent novels? If so, be forewarned that "Solar" is not cut from the same cloth. In the best of his recent works, McEwan provides readers with the supreme pleasure of a plot and characters that fully seize your consciousness and sympathy. He composes set pieces with such fine craftsmanship that you forget you are engaged in the act of reading. You lose awareness of the author's guiding hand. These are the moments readers long for: being pulled forward by a frictionless, seemingly unmediated flow of story and emotion. The opening chapter of "Enduring Love" and parts of "Saturday" achieve this magical state. Many readers, myself included, experienced this phenomenon most memorably amid the sweep of "Atonement". So a red flag must be raised this time: if you pick up "Solar," do not expect to enjoy anything similar. The book is lighter, less engrossing; it is a lark, an entertainment, its enjoyments of a different order.

- Are you usually annoyed when an irredeemably bad character occupies center stage in a novel you are reading? Do you choose your fictional heroes and heroines as carefully as you do your friends? If so, best stay clear of "Solar." Even those readers who ended up enjoying other features of the writing concede the book's protagonist -- the sole thread of continuity among the vignettes that comprise the novel as it jumps around in time and geography -- is a thoroughly despicable human being. In his own words, Michael Beard is "neither observant nor sensitive." This makes him an odd choice to carry the weight of the story. Worse yet, Beard is an inveterate liar and thief; a criminal in the making; and morally bankrupt ("But why should he feel guilt? Someone please tell him why.") At the book's end he begins to acknowledge the hell he's put people through ("Someone, or everyone, will be disappointed. Nothing new there.") Yet he doesn't much care. Being in his company is a chore -- for his five discarded wives, for his professional colleagues, and, possibly, for you as a reader.

- Are you in the mood for a picaresque comedy/satire? Take care to note "Solar" is being ballyhooed by its publisher as a "comedy" -- a book plum-filled with "comedic antics". Humor is a tricky subject for a reviewer to tackle: there are few things more subjective, more personal, than the question of what is funny. With that in mind, consider the serio-comic episode, set in the Arctic, in which Beard joins a group of environmentalist-artists on an excursion to receding glaciers. When McEwan launches into his jokes, you may be struck by how the best laughs are borrowed ones. Even if you think the author's recycling of old jokes fits within acceptable bounds of comedy piracy, you will struggle to call the humor "novel."

For example [Spoiler Alert (jokes revealed in this paragraph)], you will probably laugh again at the dilemma of a child straight-jacketed by winter clothing rendering him helpless. This is a staple of cartoons such as "The Family Circus" and "Peanuts"; kid-centered sitcoms; and movies such as "A Christmas Story" (remember the bundled up Randy?). This old chestnut is cadged by McEwan for a scene where Beard, who in so many ways is a child-like man, prepares for a sub-zero trek by donning layers and layers of clothes including multiple gloves -- only to discover his self-mummification bars him from putting on his boots, not to mention answering a call of nature. Next, you might squirm with delight, as you've done before, when Beard undergoes a variation on the "There's Something About Mary" film gag of genitals caught in a pants zipper. You may also be familiar with the lines coined by Robert Mankoff back in 1993 and used as the caption for a cartoon published in "The New Yorker" (one of its most popular ever). In the cartoon, an executive, looking at his date book and trying to dissuade a caller who's asking for an appointment, says: "No, Thursday's out. How about never -- is never good for you?" If this is part of your memory bank, you will smile again when reading a flash-back scene in "Solar," set in the early 1950's, as a co-ed parries a young Beard's request for a date by replying: "How about never? Can you make never?" [End of Spoiler Alert].

- Are you interested in a British author's take on America? If so, you will find McEwan's attention to things American to be an attractive aspect to "Solar." This is the first of McEwan's novels to be set in whole or in part in the U.S. In the book's final section, McEwan shows a fondness for our manners and our civic culture. At one point he describes "the plenitude and strangeness of America as represented by its television." He favorably notices "the intimate politeness at which Americans excel." Beard thinks about his female companion in New Mexico in these terms: "She was so merry, so hopelessly optimistic and well-disposed. So American." And of course the climate is better: "Always a delicious moment to be savored, and never to be had in the British Isles, when, showered and perfumed and wearing fresh clothes, one steps out from the air-conditioning into the smooth, invincible warmth of a southern evening."

(Mike Ettner)
160 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Solar Perplexes

Once upon a time Ian McEwan was a writer of enormous promise. His titles alone carried greater complexity and depth of meaning than most other writers' entire novels did. Consider the triple meanings intertwined in A Child in Time and Black Dogs, or the sinister double meaning of The Comfort of Strangers and The Innocent.

McEwan was a member of that rare breed, a legitimately literary writer who enjoyed a degree of financial success. This was no doubt in part because so many of his novels were turned into films. If they were more likely to play before partially filled art film theaters than jam-packed cineplexes, they still represented greater exposure than most writers of his sophistication and nuance could hope to achieve.

That McEwan's career as a writer began to run off the rails about the time of his greatest commercial success and popular acclaim, which is to say with the publication of Atonement, is perhaps nothing more than an indictment of popular tastes, or a cautionary tale for other writers of the price one pays for clutching too boldly at the brass ring.

Saturday followed Atonement, which betrayed McEwan as a writer bereft of ideas. With that book, his obligatory post 9/11 book, which has slammed so many writers face first against the brick wall of overdrawn symbolism, he reduced the worldwide clash of cultures to a brutally simplistic, symbolic depiction of the United States as a slack-jawed, sadistic British street thug. It was even more painful to read than Atonement, which was merely a much-admired author stubbing his toe. With Saturday, I found myself despising the author.

When he published On Chesil Beach, it seemed the last shreds of McEwan's supple, elastic mind were ripped along with the rest of the bodice implicit in the novel's subject matter. It was the first of McEwan's books I didn't read.

Upon reading a favorable review of his latest, Solar, which purported to be a satire of academia, with special focus on the scientific community, and the sort of political maneuvering and game playing highlighted by the recent spate of climate change emails, I thought perhaps I would give him one last chance.

Sadly, Solar has little to recommend it. As satire it falls flat. The writing is stale, perfunctory. The protagonist, Michael Beard, is a wholly unlikable character, selfish and self-absorbed, utterly bereft of moral cognition or ethical compunction. McEwan guides Beard along a paint-by-number path, the multiple telegraphed turnings treated with such authorial glee that the reader begins to suspect the author believes the reader will never suspect such clever devices. That might be true if McEwan could induce the sort of reader who considers Dan Brown complex to buy this novel.

As the novel plods to its contrived denouement, the reader is left to speculate which of the climaxes will prove fatal. Will it be the ex-con Beard had framed for the murder of his ex-wife's lover a decade before? Will it be the Climate Control Center exacting vengeance because Beard stole his award winning and lucrative solar energy theory from work his ex-wife's lover was doing at the time he died? Will it be Beard's own bloated, morbidly obese body that does the trick? It really doesn't matter which of McEwan's little tricks does the deed, the reader, if he has stuck it out this far, is only still here because he wants to see the hero die.

Raymond Chandler once wrote, "Everything a writer learns about the art or craft of fiction takes just a little away from his need or desire to write at all. In the end he knows all the tricks and has nothing to say." He could have been writing about Ian McEwan.
38 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Illumination Ulitimately Burns

McEwan's "Solar" is not an easy read and even his loyal fans might have trouble getting through it. In order to enjoy this book's dark humor potential, you have to embrace Michael Beard, a totally ignoble piece of human trash who is out of touch with himself and all of humanity in general. He's a shallow, paunchy, middle-aged guy with a history of being a womanizer. He's also a brainy physicist who's resting on his Nobel prize-winning laurels. Married to his 5th wife and deep in relationship crisis, Beard then dives into solving the problem of global warming. However, instead of becoming a hero, we find out that he's just out for himself and conning the rest of us.

I almost enjoyed seeing how low Beard sank and was ready to see him get his comeuppance when suddenly the entire focus of the story went from personal and relationship issues into science-as-crime mode. And that's where I lost much of my interest. McEwan simply refused to let this character redeem himself. Instead we're whisked into a science lab where feelings don't matter. That fact made the book feel like one big negative. The "good-in-humanity" quotient is missing.

I've not read any other books by this author and, from what I can tell, they've been extremely popular because of their underlying message. However, with "Solar" McEwan struggles to make the message clear. I found it to be extremely cynical and, in places, it made me totally uneasy. While I normally enjoy dark comedies, this one fell flat for me. You'd have to be somewhat mad-scientist-minded in order to see something even slightly funny about the real-life situation of global warming.

McEwan's style is heavy-handed and his text-book "science speak" about the subject matter bogged my progress down in what could have been a page-turner had someone like Michael Crichton been the author. Overall, McEwan seemed like he was attempting to write something that could be labeled controversial, but for me his book didn't quite earn that title due to the lack of any redeemable characters or positive outcomes. But perhaps that in itself is somewhat controversial.

Finally, the book ends with somewhat of a thud, like being pushed down and laughed at. As I closed the back cover, that's the feeling I walked away with. I'm not sure that's what McEwan intended but it's not a quality that sells a lot of books. Much like his character Beard, perhaps the author is resting on his laurels as well.
38 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Unpleasant Michael Beard

Let me just preface this review by saying that I am a fan of Mr. McEwan. I consider his novel, Atonement, to be one of the truly great books of recent years. I've also read and enjoyed a number of his other works. That said, I find this novel, Solar, to be a disappointment.

As a strong prose stylist, McEwan's books are always interesting to read and there are well-done features to this story. In it, he shows his facility with modern science and its impact on social problems, something he's done in previous books as well. This time around, the subject is global warming. Wisely, he stays away from taking a specific stance on the issue even as Michael Beard, his Nobel prize-winning physicist lead character, takes a "lucky" opportunity to explore the issue in his work, thereby putting it before the reading in a subtle way.

On the other hand, this book suffers from two features also present in some of his previous novels, but not to the extent that they impact the story as negatively as they do here. The first is a plot point. Like many excellent novelists, McEwan's novels often turn on a strange event or an odd, coincidental encounter. Sometimes this works very well--I am thinking of Briony's lie in Atonement, for example. Sometimes this works less well, as in the break-in that nearly ruins the last quarter of his otherwise excellent book, Saturday. (Spoiler alert-->) Here, we have an accidental death that for reasons I still don't quite understand or believe, Beard disguises as a murder. Unfortunately, this happens rather early in the story, is important for everything that follows, and, therefore, decreases whatever enjoyment can be found in the rest of the book.

The second problem is something that bothers me personally, but may be less important to other readers. I do not like books where there is, essentially, not a single likeable character with hardly even a redeeming quality. Michael Beard, for example, is almost completely pathetic--a Nobel prize-winner living off his laurels, guilty of intellectual theft, a serial divorcer, a serial adulterer, an absent father, obese, slovenly...Just an all-around poor specimen of a human being. As Beard is the overwhelming personality in this novel, it is rough going, but even the minor characters--mean-spirited ex-wives, abusive boyfriend of ex-wife, pathetic girlfriends, abandoned daughter, grasping colleagues--there's barely a thing to like about the bunch. These are not people with whom I want to spend my time.

Which is too bad, because McEwan's talent is immense. Even with my disappointments, I had no trouble making it to the end of the book. I am hoping, however, he reins in some of his impulses next time around for a tighter, more pleasurable experience.
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Solar: A literary eclipse

Michael Beard, a 53 year old physicist with a Nobel prize for his work on the `Beard-Einstein Conflation' in quantum physics, is past his prime. Overweight, in his fifth failed marriage, his career stalling, he is also out of sympathy with the scientific momentum on global warming - he finds all the earnest talk of the `planet in peril' too `Old Testament'.

But redemption may be at hand through the work of one of the enthusiastic post-doctoral advocates of artificial solar photosynthesis at the National Centre for Renewable Energy which Beard heads. Alas, things start to go wrong - the project hits economic, technical and intellectual property snags, and it is buffeted by the resurgence of global warming denialism.

Beard's failed romantic past also returns to haunt him in the form of an obsessive, delusional house-builder who had been having an affair with Beard's wife and has since been released from prison where he had been stewing for eight years after being framed by Beard to avoid Beard being presumed guilty for the death of the solar-impassioned post-doc who had also been having an affair with Beard's wife but who had accidentally slipped on a polar bear skin rug and died from a head injury during a confrontation with Beard.

Will the builder extract revenge? Will true love finally find a way for Michael Beard? Will Beard's company, Concentrated Solar Power, conquer the renewables market and save the planet? Who cares - alas, this is the answer, for this first novel to take global warming as its theme, by a major Booker-winning British author, is as noxious as a dirty coal-fired power station.

Although it is a page-turner, the motivation is more to discover what literary oil-slicks the coming pages hold. Plot implausibilities. Clumping, wooden dialogue. The science content clumsily grafted onto the love (or, more often, soap opera) interest (caught in the post-coital act of infidelity with Beard's wife, the solar-impassioned post-doc launches into a highly improbable disquisition on quantum coherence in photosynthesis).

The science rarely rises above tick-boxing of exotic lists (superstrings, hetrotic strings, M-theory, the `delightful intricacies of calabi-Yau manifolds and orbifolds'), stilted exposition of quantum theory and one stale joke (the string theorist caught in bed with another woman who exclaims to his wife, `Darling, I can explain everything!').

Politically, the quality is no better. Beard publicly airs his views that women's brains do not fit them as well as men's brains for engineering and physics, provoking protests which McEwan dismissively lampoons as a witch-hunt by `politically-correct' ideologues. Fanned by McEwan, the aroma of burning martyr is strong. So, to match the `Beard-Einstein Conflation' we now have what could be termed the `Beard-McEwan Conflation' which conflates feminism with `political correctness' and postmodernism in a defence of biological determinism.

The environmental politics are also abysmal. McEwan's sympathies are with carbon trading schemes and other market `solutions' to global warming, which are claimed to not only solve the environmental problem but, as Beard enthuses, make "very large sums of money, staggering sums" for their entrepreneurs. In the end, Beard, and his creator, settle comfortably on nuclear energy as the fall-back solution. "Was not the 28-kilometre exclusion zone around Chernobyl now the biologically richest and most diverse region of Central Europe", concludes Beard in a bold brief for the benefits of nuclear radiation.

If Solar is representative of contemporary literature, then give me Dickens.
16 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not Worthy of McEwan

Solar is far inferior to McEwan's superb novels: Atonement, Enduring Love, On Chesil Beach, and his Booker Prize winner Amsterdam. Solar lacks the subtle humor, dark twisted strands, and deep psychology of McEwan's best works.

The main (and really only) character Michael Beard, the Nobel laureate physicist, is a pathetic jerk who is intent on screwing up his life and himself. We witness him steadily deteriorating even as he's trying to save the planet from global warming. He's getting fatter, stuffing himself with junk food, and getting in deeper with his petty sexual affairs going awry. Five divorces to his discredit and he's still obsessively pursuing lots of casual sex in inappropriate ways. He's a mess, a slob, and getting slobbier.

There's no point in going on about all of Beard's screw ups. It'd just be a spoiler anyway.

And the symbolism, or metaphor, McEwan is pushing is trite and obvious in any case. I suppose Beard symbolizes "the planet" we're supposed to be saving and how we are screwing up while trying to save it. Like Beard we lack simple will power to do what's right and good for us and the planet. Yawn.

The plot, characters, and descriptions are exaggerated, unrealistic, and unconvincing. Some things are trivial like Beard's colleagues calling him "Professor Beard" or "Professor." Professional colleagues would not address each other this way. Even post-docs working for a leader would be on first name basis. Anyway, this is one tiny thing among vast flotillas of unconvincing stupidities. Really, in the end, none of Solar made any sense. Even Beard who is almost an interesting character fails to convince. There is no such person, there couldn't be. And let me be very clear: I did not find this to be gripping, interesting, enlightening exaggeration or fantasy--it's just drippy.

Skip this one.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Boring!

Boring! At page 117 (out of 283) I am closing the book and returning to library. I have fallen asleep over this book so many times I can't count. The self absorbed, pathetic main character holds no interest and engenders no sympathy. Usually I expect a book to grab me within the first five pages. Sometimes it takes a little longer. But I hold no hope for this treatise on narcissism. Not one character jumps out as someone you would like to know, or even talk with. If you can't present the issue in an engaging way within the first half of the book, why would I expect it to get better in the last half? Backs to the shelves.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Falstaff in a Physics Lab

The wonders Ian McEwan introduces us to in SOLAR involve a mad yet hilarious scientist groping both sexually and intellectually toward a professional summit even his Nobel in physics hasn't granted him. McEwan's Fallstaffian protagonist Michael Beard -- too villainous to be called an antihero, too enthralling to be written off as a simple cad -- manages to charm even as he is in the process of betraying his colleagues, plagiarizing the work of a young genius, even pinning a murder charge on a romantic rival. Beard's gluttonous appetite for wine, women and food competes with his passion for success at any price. His ambition to be applauded for an original way of replacing fossil fuels with heat from the sun leads Beard to take risk after risk until he has drawn a noose of suspicion around himself. How will he slip the noose, or will he hang from it? A review of SOLAR in New Scientist says McEwan's "science is excellent and bang up to date." So is his prose.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Blather

This is the second McEwan book I've begun and quit reading. Someone owes me 172 pages of time spent reading Solar while searching for a reason to continue reading this self-indulgent novel. The story makes no sense, the character of M. Beard is a slug, and at page 172, of 408, there is still no point to what has preceded and no excitement or interest in what may follow. The plot, if any, is contrived, leading nowhere. Beard is a rectum of a character. The book is a vehicle to show off, apparently, McEwan's ability to create lengthy, tiresome descriptions...the sort that true writers eschew. Readers Digest would excrete this book into maybe a 50 page novella. There may be a literary nugget hidden somewhere within its pages, but how much dirt is one willing to move to find a mote of gold? If you must read it, obtain it from the library. You will not want to add it to your collection.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

What a Slog!

Thank God I'm done with this book. It was supposed to get better, that's why I kept going. The characters held such promise, but never changed. The science was always just around the next bend, but the road curved till the end. Like a movie that is so bad you think it will get better. Well, it never got better.

This McEwan was written for someone other than me. Someone who loves an endless character study of one individual who never changes (why study a static character?). Someone who appreciates skipping years at a time and then spending page after page telling the story about the skipped years (something artistic there I'm sure, just like a donut hole exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art). Someone who reads science fiction but abhors the "science" part of the fiction. In short, after battling to get this book on my Kindle, emailing the author (he is a rather nice fellow, and I do like him personally) I now know why his publisher refused to release this to Kindle immediately. It's a bad book.

For those who think me unfair because I didn't like Dr. Beard, you're wrong. He is a character. He is drawn as a modern day scientist of the Wall Street mold. The character is unlikeable, but so what. The fact is, this was a boring read.
9 people found this helpful