Red Pill: A novel
Red Pill: A novel book cover

Red Pill: A novel

Hardcover – Deckle Edge, September 1, 2020

Price
$14.05
Format
Hardcover
Pages
304
Publisher
Knopf
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0451493712
Dimensions
6.5 x 1.25 x 9.75 inches
Weight
1.26 pounds

Description

ONE OF THE LOS ANGELES TIMES' "20 READS BOOK PEOPLE ACTUALLY WANT THIS YEAR" “Haunting and timely . . . Kunzru is not the first to write about the free-floating dread and creeping paranoia brought on by the accelerated technologies and fluid social structures of modern life, but his innovation lies in having grafted a taut psychological thriller onto an old-fashioned systems novel of the sort Don DeLillo or Thomas Pynchon used to write. The effect is dizzying, and also delightful, as he riffs on everything from the early-nineteenth-century German writer Heinrich von Kleist to surveillance culture to the Counter-Enlightenment to the history of schnitzel, while somehow still clocking in at under three hundred pages.” —Jenny Offill, The New York Review of Books “An absorbing parable of contemporary paranoiaxa0. . .xa0Mr. Kunzru has always paired his sharp, elegant prose with visions of pandemoniumxa0. . . Current events, he suggests, illustrate the madness of the world more effectively than any literary device.” —Sam Sacks, The Wall Street Journal “If there is a lasting value to Red Pill , it is in its clever and thoughtful critique of the urge of many creative and purportedly progressive people to make themselves heroes—or at the very least historical subjects—at a moment in which they clearly have so little agency or role to play . . . Red Pill is perhaps Kunzru’s most overtly political novel. It not only engages the world of electoral politics but also offers an unsparing study of the flaccid state of 21st century liberalism and the intellectuals and creative types who hold on to its false promise of order and reason.” —Kevin Lozano, The Nation “Just finished reading Red Pill by Hari Kunzru. Astonishing, absorbing, terrifying. Immensely good." —Philip Pullman, author of the His Dark Materials trilogy “Dream-like, all-consuming . . . You want to read Hari Kunzru’s Red Pill to understand the madness of the past few years." —Nicholas Cannariato, NPR “Kunzru finds the humor and humanity in it all, but even as the story spirals into well-earned hysteria, he never downplays the severity of the mental derangement unfolding on both sides of the aisle in a post-truth era, nor the ways each can intersect in the realm of conspiracy.” —Randall Colburn, The A.V. Club “Hari Kunzru’s new book Red Pill is the Gen X Midlife-Crisis Novel in its purest formxa0. . . A funny and suspenseful novel, dense with ideas, deliciously plotted, and generous with its satirical acid.” —Christian Lorentzen, Bookforum “Deeply intelligent and artfully constructed . . . Kunzru devotes a lengthy — and riveting — section of the book to Monika’s story, vividly evoking the scruffy flats and sordid betrayals of East Berlin in the mid-1980s . . . For some writers, the gently comic potential of [ Red Pill ’s] set-up would be enough. But Kunzru is too ambitious to be satisfied by academic farce.” —Jonathan Derbyshire, Financial Times “Razor-sharp . . . as an allegory about how well-meaning liberals have been blindsided by pseudo-intellectual bigots with substantial platforms, it’s bleak but compelling . . . ‘Kafkaesque’ is an overused term, but it’s an apt one for this dark tale of fear and injustice.” — Kirkus (starred) “Dazzling . . . Kunzru has created a complex, challenging, and bold story about a world gone amok. . ." — Booklist (starred) “Powerful . . . Kunzru does an excellent job of layering the atmosphere with fear and disquietude at every turning point. This nightmarish allegory leaves the reader with much to chew on about literature’s role in the battleground of ideas.” — Publishers Weekly HARI KUNZRU is the author of five previous novels: White Tears, The Impressionist, Transmission, My Revolutions, and Gods Without Men . His work has been translated into twenty-one languages, and his short stories and journalism have appeared in many publications, including The New York Times, The Guardian, and The New Yorker . He is the recipient of fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the New York Public Library, and the American Academy in Berlin. He lives in Brooklyn, New York. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. I think it is possible to track the onset of middle age exactly. It is the moment when you examine your life and instead of a field of possibility opening out, an increase in scope, you have a sense of waking from sleep or being washed up onshore, newly conscious of your surroundings. So this is where I am, you say to yourself. This is what I have become. It is when you first understand that your condition—physically, intellectually, socially, financially—is not absolutely mutable, that what has already happened will, to a great extent, determine the rest of the story. What you have done cannot be undone, and much of what you have been putting off for “later” will never get done at all. In short, your time is a finite and dwindling resource. From this moment on, whatever you are doing, whatever joy or intensity or whirl of pleasure you may experience, you will never shake the almost-imperceptible sensation that you are traveling on a gentle downward slope into darkness.xa0For me this realization of mortality took place, conventionally enough, beside my sleeping wife at home in our apartment in Brooklyn. As I lay awake, listening to her breathing, I knew that my strength and ingenuity had their limits. I could foresee a time when I would need to rest. How I’d got there was a source of amazement to me, the chain of events that had led me to that slightly overheated bedroom, to a woman who, had things turned out differently, I might never have met, or recognized as the person I wanted to spend my life with. After five years of marriage I was still in love with Rei and she was still in love with me. All that was settled, a happy fact. Our three-year-old daughter was asleep in the next room.xa0Our very happiness made me uneasy. It was a perverse reaction, I knew. I was like a miser, fretting about his emotional hoard. Yet the mental rats running round my bedroom, round my child’s bedroom, had something real behind them. It was a time when the media was full of images of children hurt and displaced by war. I frequently found myself hunched over my laptop, my eyes welling with tears. I was distressed by what I saw, but also haunted by a more selfish question: If the world changed, would I be able to protect my family? Could I scale the fence with my little girl on my shoulders? Would I be able to keep hold of my wife’s hand as the rubber boat overturned? Our life together was fragile. One day something would break. One of us would have an accident, one of us would fall sick, or else the world would slide further into war and chaos, engulfing us, as it had so many other families.xa0In most respects, I had little to complain about. I lived in one of the great cities of the world. Save for a few minor ailments I was physically healthy. And I was loved, which protected me from some of the more destructive consequences of a so-called midlife crisis. I had friends who, without warning, embarked on absurd sexual affairs, or in one case developed a ruinous crack habit that he kept hidden from everyone until he was arrested at 3 a.m. in Elizabeth, New Jersey, smoking behind the wheel of his parked car. I was not about to fuck the nanny or gamble away our savings, but at the same time, I knew there was something profoundly but subtly wrong, some urgent question I had to answer, that concerned me in isolation and couldn’t be solved by waking Rei or going on the internet or padding barefoot into the bathroom and swallowing a sleeping pill. It concerned the foundation for things, beliefs I had spent much of my life writing and thinking about, the various claims I made for myself in the world. And coincidentally or not, it arrived at a time when I was about to go away. One reason I was awake, worrying about money and climate change and Macedonian border guards, was that an airport transfer was booked for five in the morning. I never sleep well on the night before I have to travel. I’m always nervous that I’ll oversleep and miss my plane.xa0xa0xa0Tired and preoccupied, I arrived in Berlin the next day to begin a three-month residency at the Deuter Center, out in the far western suburb of Wannsee. It was just after New Year, and the wheels of the taxi crunched down the driveway over a thin crust of snow. As I caught my first glimpse of the villa, emerging from behind a curtain of white-frosted pines, it seemed like the precise objective correlative of my emotional state, a house that I recognized from some deep and melancholy place inside myself. It was large but unremarkable, a sober construction with a sharply pitched gray-tiled roof and a pale façade pierced by rows of tall windows. Its only peculiarity was a modern annex that extended out from one side, a glass cube that seemed to function as an office.xa0I paid the driver and staggered up the front steps with my bags. Before I could ring the bell, there was a buzzing sound, and the door opened onto a large, echoing hallway. I stepped through it, feeling like a fairytale prince entering the ogre’s castle, but instead of a sleeping princess, I was greeted by a jovial porter in English country tweeds. His manner seemed at odds with the somber surroundings. He positively twinkled with warmth, his eyes wide and his chest puffed out, apparently with the pleasure induced by my arrival. Had my journey been smooth? Would I like some coffee? A folder had been prepared with a keycard and various documents requiring my signature. The director and the rest of the staff were looking forward to meeting me. In the meantime, I would find mineral water and towels in my room. If I needed anything, anything at all, I had only to ask. I assured him that the only thing I wanted was to change and take a look at my study.xa0Of course, he said. Please allow me to help you with your cases.xa0We took an elevator to the third floor, where he showed me into a sort of luxurious garret. The space was clean and bright and modern, with pine furniture and crisp white sheets on a bed tucked under the sloping beams of the roof. The heaters were sleek rectangular grids, the windows double-glazed. In one corner was a little kitchenette, with a hot plate and a fridge. A door led through to a well-appointed bathroom. Despite these conveniences, the room had an austere quality that I found pleasing. It was a place to work, to contemplate.xa0When the Deuter Center wrote to offer me the fellowship, I immediately pictured myself as the “poor poet” in a nineteenth-century painting I’d once seen on a visit to Munich. The poet sits up in bed wearing a nightcap edged in gold thread, with gold-rimmed spectacles perched on his nose and a quill clamped between his jaws like a pirate’s cutlass. His attic room has holes in the windows and is obviously cold, since he’s bundled up in an old dressing gown, patched at one elbow. He’s been using pages from his own work to light the fire, which has now gone out. His possessions are meager, a hat, a coat and a stick, a candle stub in a bottle, a wash basin, a threadbare towel, a torn umbrella hanging from the ceiling. Around him books are piled upon books. Flat against his raised knees he holds a manuscript and with his free hand he makes a strange “OK” gesture, pressing thumb against forefinger. Is he scanning a verse? Crushing a bedbug? Or is he making a hole? Could he possibly be contemplating absence, the meaninglessness of existence, nothingness, the void? The poet doesn’t care about his physical surroundings, or if he does, he’s making the best of things. He is absorbed in his artistic labor. That was how I wanted to be, who I wanted to be, at least for a while.xa0The Center’s full name was the Deuter Center for Social and Cultural Research. Its founder, an industrialist with a utopian streak, had endowed it with some minor part of a fortune made during the years of the postwar economic miracle, with the aim of fostering what he airily called “the full potential of the individual human spirit.” In practical terms, this meant that throughout the year a floating population of writers and scholars was in residence at the Deuter family’s old lakeside villa, catered to by a staff of librarians, cleaners, cooks and computer technicians, all dedicated to promoting an atmosphere in which the fellows could achieve as much work as possible, without being burdened by the practical aspects of daily existence.xa0I was what they call an “independent scholar.” I had an adjunct gig at a university, but it was in a Creative Writing department, and I tried not to think about it except when it was actually happening to me, when I was sitting in a seminar room, pinned by the hollow stares of a dozen debt-ridden graduate students awaiting instruction. What I wrote was published by magazines and commercial publishers, not peer-reviewed journals. Academics found me vaguely disreputable, and I suppose I was. I’ve never been much for disciplinary boundaries. I’m interested in what I’m interested in. Five years before my invitation to Berlin I had published a book about taste, in which I’d argued (not very insistently) that it was intrinsic to human identity. This was barely a thesis, more a sort of bright shiny thing that kept the reader meandering along as I strung together some thoughts on literature, music, cinema and politics. It wasn’t the book I was supposed to be writing, an ambitious work in which I intended to make a definitive case for the revolutionary potential of the arts. The taste book sort of drifted out of me, first as a distraction from the notebooks I was filling with quotations and ideas for my definitive case for the revolutionary potential of the arts, then as a distraction from the creeping realization that I really had no definitive case to make at all, or even a provisional one. I had no clue why anyone should care about the arts, let alone be spurred by them to revolution. I cared about art, but I was essentially a waster, and throughout my life other people had never liked the things I did. The only political slogan that had ever really moved me was Ne travaillez jamais and the attempt to live that out had run into the predictable obstacles. The trouble is there’s no outside, nowhere for the disaffected to go. Refusal is meaningful if conducted en masse, but most people seem to want to cozy up to anyone with the slightest bit of power, and nothing is more scary than being left at the front when a crowd melts away behind you. Why, after all this time was the “general reader” suddenly going to find me persuasive? Why would I even want to persuade him or her? What would starting an argument achieve? If I wanted a fight, all I had to do was look at my phone. So I kept my head down and wrote my distracted essays.xa0I’d been a freelance writer since I was twenty-three. It is a ridiculous thing to do. It’s time-consuming and poorly paid. You live on your nerves. Sure, you can lie on the couch if you want, but eventually you will starve. I was in despair because I’d wasted so much time on the revolution book, and I’d just got together with Rei and needed money to make things happen for us, and suddenly I couldn’t summon the energy for the pretensions of a system, so I just wrote about some things I liked, things that made me happy, and my exhaustion must have transmitted itself in some positive manner onto the page—I am the first to admit that I’m usually a hectoring and difficult writer, given to obscurity and tortuous sentences— because a publisher offered me a contract and along with it a way out, a plausible excuse for shelving the impossible revolutionary art project, smothering the damn thing with a pillow. A mercy killing would otherwise have been embarrassing, since I’d been talking about the book for years, doing panel discussions and think-pieces and sounding off at parties. I finished the little taste book fairly quickly, and unlike my previous work, it sold. You see, said my agent, all you had to do was stop battering people over the head.xa0I did the things you do when you have a successful book. I gave interviews. I accepted invitations to festivals and conferences. Translations were sold. People bought me dinner. Then, gradually, my editor began to inquire about what I was doing next. Mostly what I was doing was getting married and moving apartments and having a baby and not sleeping and realizing that a successful book is not the same thing, financially, as a successful film or a successful song, and writing a couple of prestigious but underpaid magazine essays and agreeing to teach another class and still not sleeping much, but more than before, though still not enough to find it easy to write without self-medicating. I knew I needed to publish again, as soon as possible, but somehow the prospect of completing (or even seriously beginning) a manuscript seemed to recede in front of me. Just when things were getting really tricky, I came to the attention of whatever board or jury awarded the Deuter fellowships. I received a letter from Berlin on pleasingly heavy stationery, inviting me to apply and strongly hinting that I would receive preferential treatment if I did. And so it turned out. I begged for references from the most prestigious writers I knew, and some months later a second letter arrived, informing me that I’d been successful. Three months. Three months of peace. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • ONE OF
  • THE
  • NEW YORK TIMES
  • 'S 100 NOTABLE BOOKS OF 2020ONE OF NPR's BEST BOOKS OF 2020ONE OF THE A.V. CLUB'S 15 FAVORITE BOOKS OF 2020From the widely acclaimed author of
  • White Tears,
  • a bold new novel about searching for order in a world that frames madness as truth.
  • After receiving a prestigious writing fellowship in Germany, the narrator of
  • Red Pill
  • arrives in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee and struggles to accomplish anything at all. Instead of working on the book he has proposed to write, he takes long walks and binge-watches
  • Blue Lives
  • --a violent cop show that becomes weirdly compelling in its bleak, Darwinian view of life--and soon begins to wonder if his writing has any value at all. Wannsee is a place full of ghosts: Across the lake, the narrator can see the villa where the Nazis planned the Final Solution, and in his walks he passes the grave of the Romantic writer Heinrich von Kleist, who killed himself after deciding that "no happiness was possible here on earth." When some friends drag him to a party where he meets Anton, the creator of
  • Blue Lives
  • , the narrator begins to believe that the two of them are involved in a cosmic battle, and that Anton is "red-pilling" his viewers--turning them toward an ugly, alt-rightish worldview--ultimately forcing the narrator to wonder if he is losing his mind.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(262)
★★★★
25%
(218)
★★★
15%
(131)
★★
7%
(61)
23%
(200)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

How history informs

Anyone who has seen the Matrix remembers the meaning of the “red pill” (v. the blue pill). Give it a wider berth and the symbolism will rear its head in Kunzru’s bleak and electrifying thriller-like domestic drama-esque, Kafka-esque new novel. The protagonist and narrator of Pill is a struggling, blocked writer determined to pen a book about the self, in all its high-brow, philosophical, historical, allusion-filled and allegorical connotations. He, the Brooklyn writer, aware of his mid-life funk, appears to have a loving relationship with his wife and daughter, but he is no longer certain if that is true—what is the criteria?---or about his sense of reality or utility.

The narrator accepts a writing fellowship near Berlin for a three-month stint, where most of the action takes place. But it also furnishes solid, revealing dialogue with his wife, Rei, in back story and current phone calls home. Unfortunately, is also where plans for the Final Solution took place during the Holocaust. Herr Deuter, the industrialist who started this “Deuter Center for Social and Cultural Research,” in the late 1970s, expressed his belief that “the royal road to the future lay in confronting the darkness of the past.” What follows is a strange, mind-bending tale about the self and reality that takes our increasingly damaged narrator on a stark journey of revelation and paranoia.

Instead of an independent residency, the protagonist learns (condescendingly) from the current director that his activities are closely monitored, and there are petty policies like where he can work: only at the public Workspace, intensifying his discomfort with these illogical rules (that’s the Kafka-esque point of entry). He stops writing, and begins taking long walks around the perimeter of the center, and watching a mainstream, uninspiring cop show on TV. Uninspiring but chilling, too.

Nothing can be assessed at face value at the Deuter Center. On his walks, the narrator frequently passes the grave of the writer Heinrich von Kleist, a hysteric and writer of chaotic, fragmented stories. Kleist died in a suicide pact with an acquaintance, a woman immaterial in his life. As the walks become regular, the grave’s presence begins to steadily disturb and alarm Kunzru’s protagonist.

The largely conventional police show the narrator obsesses over is Blue Lives, which showcases cops who have lost their moral compass and become criminals themselves; they torture their victims. However, on this typically low-brow and brutish show, our narrator discovers that one of the cops quotes a well-known but vile and dogmatic figure of the past, Joseph de Maistre. Maistre was a late eighteenth century philosopher who was anti-Enlightenment, a supporter of authoritarian rule by Kings and Popes that he believed were divined by God. He was like a dark figure straight out of the Middle Ages, a theocrat and furious autocrat. Subsequently, Kunzru’s narrator meets the creator of the show, an alt-right racist named Anton. The Brooklyn writer’s piercing curiosity with Blue Lives turns to Anton, as Anton represents everything that is sinister and dark, and hurls our narrator toward a psychic battle with the wicked. He wants Anton to explain his appalling ethos.

Kunzru’s prose is limber and immersive, and kept me close to the story even when I thought I lost the plot and misplaced the premise. The more dire our narrator’s mood, the more mired in the murky past and his fear of the future, the more amorphous the storyline was to me. However, if you think the tale is a tangle of ambiguous, inexact implications, don’t worry. Kunzru’s novel has a rewarding payoff where the loose threads tighten up and clarify where and what and why. In fact, the moment of clarity is akin to an organic epiphany, and a warning. If the past is prologue, when is the future epilogue?

The author’s key construct is almost too orderly. He quite leans over into a formula of his own artful making (almost occult), but the way he gets away with it is impressive! His position on humanity is benevolent and kind to the earth and the people who populate it. It seems certain that Kunzru felt a moral imperative and expressed it through art. I am the perfect recipient and I believe that history—100 or 1000 years from now—will agree with me, with us, the victors.

Thank you to Penguin Random House for an ARE via Net Galley. This is my honest assessment.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A lame follow up to White Tears

Red Pill is what happens when your publisher pushes you to quickly follow up a successful book (White Tears). The latter was amazing and one I want to reread again and again.

Red Pill moves slowly at first. The middle gets interesting, yet the main character is a depressing human who stays that way. Redemption never comes. And the last 50 pages just seem to be filler / the authors own thoughts on the Clinton/Trump election. Yes, we all thought Clinton would win. Does this need to be rehashed in a novel?

Even if you’ve enjoyed Kunzru’s previous works, this is one to skip.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Let-Down After the Masterful White Tears

*Contains mild spoilers*

I have read White Tears several times, and teach excerpts from it. In this follow-up, Kunzru seems to be attempting to weave a similar fabric to the one he he crafted so deftly and subtly in White Tears, whose layers of history and complexity included cultural appropriation, theater and music history, time travel, madness, gothic horror, and racial reckoning -- in spite of the wide-ranging subject matter, the book is a near-masterpiece. Kunzru's effort falls flat in Red Pill, however. The books share certain features, which makes Red Pill seem like a repetitive rehashing: an unreliable narrator, a nemesis who seems to possess supernatural power, and a reexamination of dark corners of recent history. In the end, however, where White Tears was about powerful cultural elements in America that can perhaps never be healed in spite of the best efforts, Red Pill is about . . . nothing, really.

The protagonist is a lucky man: a successful literary critic with a beautiful and ambitious wife and a young daughter who wins a prestigious fellowship to a German institute, where he is unable to work, becomes obsessed with the director of a nihilistic American cop show, and has a nervous breakdown. We never really find out what's wrong with the institute, but something is: is it the malevolent, possibly white-nationalist porter? His obnoxious colleagues? Some hinted-at surveillance of the guests? Or is it the mere fact that the building occupies land used for infamous Nazi conferences in the last century? Kunzru drops all these suggestions, but never follows up. A long section of the book is taken up with the story of a minor character who never reappears; it's hard to see what bearing her narrative has on that of the protagonist. The protagonist's nemesis, Gary Bridgeman, is also referred to as Anton, for reasons that are left unexplained. The end of the novel conflates the widespread shock over the result of the 2016 presidential election with the narrator's nervous breakdown, with the result that, in the fall of 2020, it is impossible to interpret his anxiety about the future as stemming from Hillary Clinton's unexpected loss or from his own mental illness.

Kunzru is an elegant, spare writer, and his prose carries the novel along at a fast pace. But in the end, Red Pill is a disappointment, seemingly a too-quick capitalization on the success of White Tears.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Red Pill: flat, fluff, flawed.

I preface this to say, the ending is patched up, and nearly sympathy-inducing enough to try and convince you that you haven’t wasted your time entirely, but the damage has already been done in the girth of pages labored on by the reader, and so one cannot be convinced, in the end, to consider this novel with any admiration or affection. So, here we go:

Read this book if you desire insight on exactly how not to write a novel or character and how not to reveal yourself (this is a judgment that I can't seem to shake, though this is the first novel I have read by this author) as the character in more ways than not. The beginning had much promise, based simply on the loveliness of the setting and the somehow foreboding sense of mischief and paranoia about the grounds of the Deuter Center (the location of the narrator's writing fellowship in Berlin where he is meant to work on his next book). But now that I have willed myself against all rationale to reach the end of this novel I realize that instead of auto-fiction or literary fiction this novel could have been saved by subjecting itself to the warm embrace of genre-fiction: murder mystery in Berlin, I beg you! Or even better: the protagonist has an affair! Anything. I would have taken anything other than what this novel was. It is unfortunate that no one in the author's circle in relation to the editing or publishing of this book could ascertain that although the main character has every right to spiral out of control into the drafty dens of mental disparity (and such revelation could be great certainly if only it had been) the narrator's misadventures are utterly unbelievable and lamentable. And they are unbelievable and lamentable still if they are, in fact, autobiography masked as fiction. Even fact can’t save the bulk of this work or the withered nature of our uncertain adult protagonist from falling flat, lackluster, inconceivably shallow.

Spoilers may follow.

I found myself constantly confounded at the narrator's decision and indecision: his total awareness of his frailty (mentioned at points by himself) and his utter weakness in the face of all that he claims to hold dear, that of his wife and daughter back home in the United States whom he claims he will do anything for. The character has run-ins with a few rough and tumble men who exude a sort of physical masculinity and faux-intellectual brute force (ignorant or not) that leave our narrator in utter cold-sweats, gasping for a savior, wild with contempt at their brute confidence which is admittedly annoying. The first foe disappears into the book and the anxiety around his appearance by the narrator proves immaterial to the story, if not as foreshadowing for the next mean man. This second foe (whose grim cop TV show our narrator is obsessed with, distracting him from his writing) is otherwise a complete and utter stranger whom he meets while drunk at a big film event in Berlin and who eventually makes broad, racially insensitive remarks as the evening closes. Later, this agitating Hollywood foe pretends to be some sort of historian and snakes his way into the Deuter center. He causes some scene under the guise of being our narrator's friend, and not once does the narrator defend himself in front of the staff to say that these are not, in fact, his friends as they claim to be, until it is far too late, and the damage is already done. By association, our blocked writer is released (kicked out) from his fellowship. This is immaterial, as this writer has not written anything during his two-month stay. Immediately he goes on a wild goose chase for this random Hollywood stranger who got under his skin. The utter vanity of needing to unleash a good come-back far after the conversation has ended (rather than his typically fearful or jumbled half-replies) leads him to ultimately stalk this individual across Europe. This foe has proven himself to be a far-right racist with a barely-touched on threat of “the idea of the North” or white supremacy that convalesces into the real, historical threat of the 2016 presidential election in which Trump reigns as the new poster-boy of this vision. This threat is almost bullet-point, quick-note, and crammed in lazily toward the end of the novel, though it would have been much more interesting if it were truly explored. But that would require a sort of attention and bravery that fails the page here.

The problem with this improbable race across Europe for the Hollywood foe is that it would interesting if it were interesting. And it would be believable if it were believable. I am here to tell you that, in execution, and though the writing technically flows very well, it simply is not in any regard. The main character will lead any sane reader to a state of dread or utter remorse for the state of what the contemporary novel can be passed off and published as. Outline more than meat. Idea more than execution.

In plain terms, so much of this novel is fluff, typed out to fill a void, to reach a deadline, to waste the reader and author’s time completely. If it were necessary for the author to write this, it would have been better left as a therapeutic journal and nothing more. In the end, it is a book that has the aesthetic exterior of something promising, but the foundational merit of something below Reader’s Digest. I am not one to write negative reviews and I do think that this author has the potential to write something of merit and probably has, but I do feel that since I stuck it out with a book that left me with zero hope for mental reprieve, that I would impart my true opinion, and it is with no sarcasm that I repeat: if you do choose to read it, you may grab something from it that sticks with you, but hopefully it is this—this is not the blueprint for a good work; dear writer, don’t write like this if you can help it. In the margins of this book I cannot tell you the number of times I wrote: telling not showing! It’s like a synopsis of the protagonist’s mind. A treatment. We never get inside this mind. Not even when he allegedly goes mad (more like a self-indulgent mid-life crisis for the sake of a much-needed ending).

At one point while reading this I remember thinking: is it possible for a bot to produce fictional events? Am I reading the work of an automated mind? And yet, the writing and pace itself I held no issue with. It was the character that I began to feel utterly allergic to and this is coming from someone who loves a flawed character. A believable one. A real one. This narrator was a shell of reference and half-questions derived from half-convictions, not a soul on the page, not a bleeding heart. The effect is that of a cold stale baguette left uncovered on the table too long and given a check to make something of itself eventually. But as a writer myself it is important to be objective enough with the failures that we produce to realize when they must be abandoned or completely revived. And this revival often involves lots of deleting. If only that deleting had occurred here I would not be writing this.

In closing, I will add: there is an entire section (maybe 45 pages or so) that deals with a random side-character that reveals very little (if anything) about the narrator, except that he, according to this side-person, is “soft,” something we have certainly already ascertained, but to what end? What revelation? This section is filler and the side-character is never heard from again though we learn her entire, trite back story. And I found myself thinking: has the entire novel been filler? Waste? But I stuck with it, because there must be some light at the end of the tunnel, right? Unfortunately, in this case, there just isn’t.

This stated, I hope for better from this and many a modern writer who may find themselves at times more reference than character, more association than soul. We’ve got better in us.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Blech

A story of self-indulgent musings often in excruciating detail. The most interesting part of the book was the middle which relayed the back story of a side character. I wonder what I read that caused me to buy this book.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Uneven But Ultimately Satisfying

This is a very readable novel about a tortured soul. He's somebody who has a sense darkness is coming to the world and (probably in an act of masochism) heads to an institute in Germany in order to work on a book. I felt like the book wandered around a bit in the middle but the last part (set on Election Night 2016) really wrapped things up nicely.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A thoughtful story about a topical subject

I have read all of Hari Kunzru's books and I have to say that every book of his is completely different. It is hard to even pin down a writing style. I have read around 400 books, mostly ones that would be considered literature, and mostly international authors. I admire him for telling interesting stories. Even though I bought the book when it came out in 2021, I postponed reading it until now, February of 2023, because I do not like when authors or musicians go political and start trying to teach lessons. His intention in this story is not clear, to me anyways, although I am sure many people assumed his point of view. I consider myself a classic liberal in my 60's and am blown away with the people who require you to bow down to their thoughts and opinions. I am also amazed of lack of critical thinking is out in the world now. The focus of this so called intellectual that shares the opinion of so many "so called" intellectuals, to me he was both narcissistic and arrogant. So though I was braced with the fact that this author might have gone the way of this character, the character was pathetic and cowardly, but still so arrogant about his and his wife's precious thoughts. Both him, his wife and friends learned nothing at the end of the book. I also really thought about the concept that people that have some power to influence others, use fear as the mechanism to manipulate populations. I am amazed how easy it is for huge amounts of people to jump on one bandwagon to the next, but I guess fear might motivate that, whether it be fear of not fitting in or just plain believing the bs the group think is putting out. So, I have not given up on this author and I suggest reading his earlier book "The Impressionist". Take this review with a grain of salt, I do not require you agree with me!
✓ Verified Purchase

Red Pill - No one magnifies life's annoyances into their worst form better than Hari Kunzru.

No one takes life's anxieties and annoyances and magnifies them into their worst form better than Hari Kunzru. We are all lucky that Hari doesn't consult with the devil to devise punishments for our life's shortcomings.

Warning general discussion of the Red Pill plotline follows.

Our story starts with our protagonist writer who arrives at the Deuter Center in Wannsee Germany has been awarded room, board and a stipend so he can write his next book. Our protagonist shares the Deuter Center with other promising guests. Hari will make you dislike our protagonist for his short sighted choices. At the same as I reflect back on Red Pill, I could easily see myself making any of our protagonist's mistakes and being dragged down into Kunzru's life minefield.

I misjudged the beginning of this book because I believed that it was another author complaining about writer's block. However, the writer's block really is just a mechanism to throw you into the protagonist's procrastination extended attempts to not write his next book.

Hari delivers us through an interesting glimpses of murder suicide events, dealing with toxic self appointed genius who berates all around them as being unworthy, East Germany's domination by the Stassi, Cop and Robber shows with excessive cruelty, the tedious boredom and forced conformity by large corporate organizations, trying to perform a good deed for a stranger that goes hideously wrong and the romp goes on. Our protagonist is away from his family which allows him to further explore events one would normally cut short.

Our protagonist meets up with that hip smart guy Anton who promises interesting experiences offered to those in the know. Our protagonist flounders in adjusting to Anton's appetites.

As in his other books, Hari takes us through the inner tour of sanity stretched to its limits when faced with evil.

The final and most terrifying events in Red Pill occur when reunited with his family.
✓ Verified Purchase

You Can Choose

What a brilliant book!
Erudite, passionate, and complete in demonstrating how a man becomes demented, even lost for a while, although he retains the love he feels for his family.
The number of allusions, comparisons, and connections is sometimes beyond my complete understanding, but adds endless depth to the book. (Be sure to read Meike's review of the book in Goodreads) And that is part of the point: the connection to a network of thoughts, delusion, and despair.
It brilliantly ends in Trump's election when these forces lead so many to wander away the ability to serve what or who they truly love.
Obviously, I can't recommend it enough.
✓ Verified Purchase

Beautiful cover, lacks anything truly compelling

Truly was rooting for this book, and it does have a powerful beginning, with all the write/right pieces in places to keep you reading. But 100 pages along I realize that the arc had already played itself out and I begin skipping ahead, trying to find something that mattered. Dissapointing because the writer is beyond good but more like a an essay that was stretched out, making the final product way to thin.