Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West
Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West book cover

Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West

Paperback – Illustrated, June 12, 2007

Price
$15.38
Format
Paperback
Pages
464
Publisher
Anchor
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0307279484
Dimensions
5.23 x 1 x 8 inches
Weight
13.2 ounces

Description

“Ambitious....a sweeping popular account that seems destined to become a classic.” — The Seattle Times “Excellent. . . . There is an even-handedness in Holland’s treatment of both Greek and Persian cultural riches that is rare in popular accounts of these wars.” — Sunday Times “Holland has a rare eye for detail, drama, and the telling anecdote. . . . A book as spirited and engaging as Persian Fire deserves to last.” — The Telegraph Tom Holland is a historian of the ancient world and a translator. His books include Rubicon: The Triumph and Tragedy of the Roman Republic , Persian Fire , In the Shadow of the Sword and The Forge of Christendom . He has adapted Homer, Herodotus, Thucydides and Virgil for the BBC. In 2007, he was the winner of the Classical Association prize, awarded to “the individual who has done most to promote the study of the language, literature and civilization of Ancient Greece and Rome.” He lives in London with his family. Visit the author's website at www.tom-holland.org. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1The Khorasan Highway Woe to the Bloody City The gods, having scorned to mold a world that was level, had preferred instead to divide it into two. So it seemed to those who lived in the Zagros, the great chain of peaks which separates the Fertile Crescent from the upland plateau of Iran. Yet these mountains, though savage, were not impassable. One road did snake across them: the most famous in the world, the Khorasan Highway, which led from the limits of the East to the West, and joined the rising to the setting of the sun. In places, as it climbed through the Zagros Mountains, winding along river beds, or threading between jagged pinnacles and ravines, it might be little more than a footpath--but even that, to those who used it, was a miracle enough. Only a beneficent deity, it was assumed, could ever have fashioned such a wonder. Who, and when, no one really knew for sure,* but it was certainly very ancient--perhaps, some said, as old as time itself. Over the millennia, the Khorasan Highway had been followed by any number of travelers: nomads, caravans--and the armies of conquering kings.One empire, in particular, for centuries synonymous with cruel and remorseless invincibility, had sent repeated expeditions into the mountains, dyeing the peaks, in its own ferocious vaunt, "like wool, crimson with blood."(1) The Assyrians, inhabitants of what is now northern Iraq, were city-dwellers, a people of the flat, alluvial plains; but to their kings, warlords who had spread terror and extermination as far as Egypt, the Zagros was less a barrier than a challenge. Themselves the patrons of a proud and brilliant civilization, sumptuous with palaces, gardens and canals, the kings of Assyria had always seen it as their duty to flatten resistance in the wilds beyond their frontiers. This, the wilds being what they were, had proved a calling without limit. Not even with their incomparable war machine could the Assyrians pacify all the mountain tribes--for there were some living in the Zagros who clung to the peaks like birds, or lurked in the depths of thick forests, so backward that they subsisted entirely on acorns, savages hardly worthy of the royal attention. These too, however, with regular incursions, could be taught to dread the name of Assyria, and provide her with the human plunder on which her greatness had come increasingly to depend. Again and again, punitive expeditions would return from the mountains to their native plains, to the sacred cities of Ashur, Nimrud and Nineveh, while in their wake, naked and tethered, followed stumbling lines of captives. Increasingly, the Assyrians had fallen into the habit of moving entire populations, shunting them around their empire, transplanting one defeated enemy into the lands of another, there to live in the houses of the similarly transported, to clear weeds from the rubble, or cultivate the abandoned, smoke-blackened fields.These tactics had in the end had due effect. By the late eighth century BC, the reaches of the Khorasan Highway had been formally absorbed into the empire and placed under the rule of an Assyrian governor. "Grovelling they came to me, for the protection of their lives," boasted Assyria's greatest king, Sargon II. "Knowing that otherwise I would destroy their walls, they fell and kissed my feet."(2)Not that captives were the only source of wealth to be found in the Zagros. Wild and forested though the mountains were, and often bitter the climate, the valleys were famous for their clover-rich pasture. Over the centuries, and in increasing numbers, these had been attracting tribes who called themselves "Arya"--"Aryans": horse-taming nomads from the plateau to the east.(3) Even once settled, these immigrants had preserved many of their ancestors' instincts, filling the valleys of their new homeland with great herds of long-horned cattle, and preferring, wherever possible, to live in the saddle. The Assyrians, no horse-breeders themselves, would speak in wondering terms of the stud farms of the Zagros, with their "numberless steeds."(4) It was relatively easy for the Assyrian army to cherry-pick these as tribute, for the finest horses, by universal consent, were those bred by the Medes, a loose confederation of Aryan tribes settled conveniently along the Khorasan Highway itself. No wonder the Assyrians came to prize the region. Their mastery of Media,(5) as well as enabling them to control the world's most important trade route, permitted their armies to develop a new and lethal quality of speed. By the eighth century BC, cavalry had become vital to the ability of Assyria to maintain her military supremacy. The tribute of horses from the mountains had become the lifeblood of her greatness. The richest silver mine could not have been more precious to her than the stud farms of the Zagros.And yet, in Assyria's supremacy lay the seeds of its own downfall. The mountains were a mishmash of different peoples, Aryans and aboriginals alike, with even the Medes themselves ruled by a quarrelsome multitude of petty chieftains. Foreign occupation, however, by imposing a unitary authority upon the region, had begun to encourage the fractious tribes to cohere. By the 670s BC, menaced by the shadowy leader of a formal Median union, the Assyrians' hold on the Zagros started to slip alarmingly. Tribute dried up as its collection became ever more challenging. Open revolts blazed and spread. Over the following decades, the scribes of the Assyrian kings, employed to keep a record of the victories of their masters, ceased to make mention of Media at all.This silence veiled an ominous development. In 615 BC, a king who claimed sovereignty over all the clan chiefs of the Medes, Cyaxares by name, joined an alliance of the empire's other rebellious subjects and led his troops from their fastnesses against the Assyrians' eastern flank. The effect of this sudden eruption of the mountain men was devastating. After only three years of campaigning, the inconceivable occurred: Nineveh, greatest of all the strongholds of Assyrian might, was stormed and razed. To the amazement--and joy--of the empire's subject peoples, "the bloody city" was pulverized beneath the hooves of the Median cavalry. "Horsemen charging, flashing sword and glittering spear, hosts of slain, heaps of corpses, dead bodies without end--they stumble over the bodies!"(6)Four years later, and all traces of the Assyrian colossus, which for so long had kept the Near East in its shadow, lay obliterated. To the victors, naturally, had fallen the spoils. Media, precipitately elevated to the rank of great power, seized a huge northern swath of the defeated empire. Her kings, no longer small-time chieftains, could now indulge themselves in the occupations proper to their newly won status--throwing their weight around and scrapping with other great powers. In 610 BC, the Medes swept into northern Syria, burning and looting as they went. In 585, they went to war with the Lydians, a people based in the west of what is now Turkey, and only a solar eclipse, manifesting itself over the battlefield, finally persuaded the two sides to draw back. By the terms of a hurriedly patched-up treaty, the Halys, a river flowing midway between Media and Lydia, was established as the boundary between the rival empires, and for the next thirty years, throughout the Near East, peace, and the balance of power, were maintained.(7)Not that the new king of Media, Astyages, had any intention of hanging up his saddle. Undistracted now by war with other major empires, he turned his attention instead to the wilds north and east of his kingdom, far distant from the cockpit of the Fertile Crescent. Leading an expedition into the badlands of Armenia and what is now Azerbaijan, he was following in the footsteps of the Assyrian kings, teaching the savages beyond his frontiers to fear his royal name.(8) In other ways, too, the traditions of the great monarchies of the Near East, so alien to those of his own people, still semi-tribal and nomadic as they were, appear to have whetted the ambitions of the Median king. After all, a ruler of Astyages' stature, no less powerful than the King of Lydia or the Pharaoh of Egypt, could hardly be expected to rule his empire from a tent. What the monarchs of more ancient lands had always taken for granted--a palace, a treasury, a mighty capital--Astyages, naturally, had to have as well: proofs of his magnificence raised in gold and blocks of stone.Travelers who made the final ascent through the mountains along the Khorasan Highway would see, guarding the approaches to the Iranian plateau ahead of them, a vision which could have been conjured from some fabulous epic: a palace set within seven gleaming walls, each one painted a different color, and on the two innermost circuits, bolted to their battlements, plates of silver and gold. This was Ecbatana, stronghold of the kings of Media, and already, barely a century after its foundation, the crossroads of the world.(9) Commanding the trade of East and West, it also opened up to its master the whole range of the Zagros, and beyond. Here, for the Median clan chiefs, in particular, was a thoroughly alarming development. The surest guarantee of their freedom from royal meddling, and of the continued factionalism of the kingdom itself, had always been the inaccessibility of their private fiefdoms--but increasingly they found themselves subordinated to the reach of Astyages' court. At one time, before the building of the polychrome palace walls, Ecbatana had been an open field, a free meeting place for the tribes, a function preserved in the meaning of its name: "assembly point." But now those days were gone, and the Medes, who had fought so long to liberate themselves from the despots of Nineveh, found themselves the subjects of a despot nearer to home.No wonder that later generations would preserve a memory of Astyages as an ogre. No wonder, either, that when they sought to explain their loss of freedom, the Medes would identify Ecbatana as both a symbol of their slavery, and a cause.(10) King of the World Astyages, it was said, even amid all the proofs of his greatness, was haunted by prophecies of doom: strange dreams tormented him, warning him of his downfall and the ruin of his kingdom. Such was the value ascribed by the Medes to visions of this kind that a whole class, the Magi, existed to divine what their meaning might be. Skilled in all the arts of keeping darkness at bay, these ritual experts provided vital reassurance to their countrymen, for it was a principle of the Medes, a devout and ethical people, that there was shadow lurking beyond even the brightest light. All the world, it seemed to the Magi, bore witness to this truth. A fire might be tended so that it burned eternally, but there was nowhere, not beside the coolest spring, nor even on the highest mountain peak, where the purity of its flame might not be menaced by pollution. Creation bred darkness as well as the daylight. Scorpions and spiders, lizards, snakes and ants, all crept and seethed, the visible excrescences of a universal shadow. Just as it was the duty of a Magus to kill such creatures wherever he found them, so shadows had to be guarded against when they darkened people's dreams--and especially the nightmares of a king. "For they say that the air is full of spectres, which flow by exhalation, and penetrate into the sight of those with piercing vision."(11) Greatness, like fire, had to be tended with care.That a kingdom as powerful as Media, less than a century after its first rise to independence and greatness, might once again be prostrated and subjected to foreign domination must, to many, have seemed implausible. But this, as the Medes themselves had good cause to know, had always been the baneful rhythm of the region's power play: great empires rising, great empires falling. No one kingdom, not even Assyria, had ever crushed all who might wish to see it destroyed. In the Near East, predators lurked everywhere, sniffing the air for weakness, awaiting their opportunity to strike. Ancient states would vanish, new ones take their place, and the chroniclers, in recording the ruin of celebrated kingdoms, might find themselves describing strange and previously unknown peoples.Many of these, just like the Medes themselves, were Aryans--nomads who had left little trace of their migrations upon the records of the time. In 843 BC, for instance, the Assyrians had campaigned in the mountains north of their kingdom against a tribe they called the "Parsua"; two centuries later, a people with a very similar name had established themselves far to the south, on the ruins of the venerable kingdom of Anshan, between the lower reaches of the Zagros and the sweltering coastlands of the Gulf. No chronicler, however, could know for sure if they were one and the same.(12) Only by putting down roots, and by absorbing something of the culture of the people they had displaced, had the newcomers finally been able to intrude upon the consciousness of their more sedentary neighbors. These, reluctant to change the habit of centuries, had continued to refer to the region as they had always done; but the invaders, when they spoke of their new homeland, had naturally preferred to call it after themselves. So it was that what had once been Anshan came gradually to be known by a quite different name: Paarsa, Persia, the land of the Persians.(13) In 559 bc, while Astyages still ruled in Media, a young man came to the throne of this upstart kingdom. His name was Cyrus, and his attributes included a hook nose, immense ambition and quite limitless ability. From even before his birth, it appeared, he had been marked out for greatness; for it was he--if the stories are to be believed--who had been prophesied as the bane of Median greatness. Astyages was supposed to have seen it all in a dream: a vision of his daughter, Mandane, urinating, the golden stream flowing without cease, until at last the whole of Media had been drowned. When the king had reported this the next morning, his Magian dream-readers had turned pale and warned him that any son of Mandane would be destined to imperil the Median throne. Hurriedly, Astyages had married off his daughter to a vassal, a Persian, the prince of a backward and inconsequential kingdom, hoping in that way to defeat the omen's malice. But after Mandane had fallen pregnant, Astyages had dreamed a second time: now he saw a vine emerging from between his daughter's legs, nor did it stop growing until all Asia was in its shade. Panic-stricken, Astyages had waited for his grandson to be born, and then immediately given orders that the boy be put to death. As invariably happens in such stories, the orders had been defied. The baby had been abandoned on a mountainside, to be discovered and brought up by a shepherd; or perhaps, some said, a bandit; or maybe even a bitch, her teats conveniently swollen with milk. Whatever its precise details, the miraculous nature of such an upbringing had clearly betokened a godlike future for the foundling--and so, of course, it had proved. Cyrus had survived and prospered. Once he had grown to a splendid manhood, his natural nobility of character had served to win him the Persian throne. Thus it was that all the wiles of Astyages had been foiled--and the empire of the Medes been doomed. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • In the fifth century B.C., a global superpower was determined to bring truth and order to what it regarded as two terrorist states. The superpower was Persia, incomparably rich in ambition, gold, and men. The terrorist states were Athens and Sparta, eccentric cities in a poor and mountainous backwater: Greece. The story of how their citizens took on the Great King of Persia, and thereby saved not only themselves but Western civilization as well, is as heart-stopping and fateful as any episode in history. Tom Holland’s brilliant study of these critical Persian Wars skillfully examines a conflict of critical importance to both ancient and modern history.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(823)
★★★★
25%
(343)
★★★
15%
(206)
★★
7%
(96)
-7%
(-96)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

A good book on the conflict, not not the best out there.

In "Persian Fire", author Tom Holland recounts the conflict between the great empire of Persia and the Greek world that a great many would argue changed world history and could have altered world history in ways we couldn't even imagine had the Persians prevailed.

The author "sets the stage" with a history of the Medo-Persians who came down from the mountains and uplands of what is today Iran and Turkey to defeat the Assyrians and conquer the "known world". So, with the defeat of the Egyptians, the Persian empire stretched from India to Africa. Holland recounts revolt of the Ionian cities which brought the Persians into conflict with the Greeks and served as the impetus for the Persian invasion of Europe.

This book is very much centered on the Persian perspective, chronicling the ascendancy of first the Medes and then the Persians. He looks at Zoroastrianism and it's influence on the thinking of Persian monarchs. The book essentially follows the Persians and their expansion which inevitable brought them into Europe.

In other ways, it's well-plowed ground, recounting the battles between the Persians and the Greeks beginning with the first invasion under Darius which ended at Marathon and expanding with the campaign commanded by Xerxes with highlights at Thermopylae, the sea battles off Artemesium and Salamis as well as the final act at Plataea where the Persian threat ended.

It's a good retelling of the History of the conflict - especially if you want more from the Persian perspective and with more of their history. I admit if given a choice, I'd recommend [[ASIN:0306813602 Thermopylae: The Battle For The West]] by Ernle Bradford who writes more from the Greek point of view as well as being written in a more engaging style even including some wry humor here and there.

Once again, a good book from the Persian POV, but well-plowed ground that's been done before and a little better. Four stars.
33 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Propaganda

A standard digest of the usual Greek propaganda. Actually the Greeks and Persians were closely linked culturally and Greek mercenaries played an important role in the Persian military. Historians typically underestimate the extent of the ties between East and West, and vice versa.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointing. A Johnathan Phillips, Holland is not.

I thought for a long time before deciding to review this book. I love ancient history and have read many, many works from the earliest days by different writers. Never have I found a book that I could not complete, until this one. Holland certainly does have a lot of information and the book is ambitious....perhaps overly ambitious. I waded through 161 pages of a hodge-podge of fact, supposition, myth, names, places, history, run-on sentences, incomplete sentences, until I simply gave up. Holland forgets that a book needs facts, yes, ideas, yes, but it also needs good English writing, so that his readers can follow and understand. This book needed another editor or a better editor. It needed a few more re-writes and better organization if Holland meant it for any but the few History Ph.D's who might take it up for a Sunday afternoon struggle. I bought the book to learn about the Persians. I will have to shop for another writer.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great story ruined by twisted syntax

And it was a with a clause that Holland prefers his sentences begin with, and the reader finds that it is a straight forward narrative that is lost, as the reader stops to untangle each sentence before preceding to the next.

I've finished the first volume of Norwich's brilliant History of Byzantium. I want to balance it with an equally deep understanding of some of the eastern Empires, and had high hopes for this book. It's a fascinating topic marred by a groan-inducing text.

I suspect that the twisted syntax is used partially to cover up holes in the narrative.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Dubious facts and modern assumptions about ancient heroes

This history of the Greco-Persian wars of the 5th-century BC is fundamentally misconceived, as becomes clear in its introduction, where the author reassures the reader of the topical relevance of his story by purportedly tracing the present conflict between the U.S. and Islamic fundamentalists back to it. Herodotus, easily the most important source of our knowledge, is alleged to have been drawn to his tale through wondering why “the people of East and West find it so hard to live in peace.” This is simply not true: Herodotus said he was interested in “the cause of the hostilities between Greeks and non-Greeks.” It has long been popular to claim historical legitimacy for that self-fulfilling concept, “western” culture, by tracing it back to the Greeks, but personally I think it greatly overdone. The Greeks would have considered Holland’s real forbears as at least as barbaric as the Persians and I suspect in most respects they would feel much more at home in the traditional Moslem countries of the Mediterranean, with their similarities of family structure, food, dress, beliefs about gender, fate, sex, hospitality etc. than in the US. This matters because Holland’s story is skewed throughout by his fundamental assumption.

Greek Fire is eminently readable with lively character sketches and anecdotes and the most interesting facts well marshalled. The frequently colloquial language will appeal to many, though personally I found it gave the narrative a gratingly modern and anachronistic flavour. This is popular history and I would accept it on its own terms if only it did not misinform so often. Hundreds of examples could be listed, but to do so would be to bore most while wrongly suggesting to the seriously interested that this is a history whose conclusions are worth lengthy consideration. Two very different ones will suffice.

According to all the ancient sources, the Persian King Cambyses was succeeded by someone pretending to be his dead brother Bardiya, but, when the ruse was soon after discovered, the impostor was killed and his throne taken by Darius the Great. A few modern historians have speculated that perhaps the assassinated King was genuinely Bardiya and his impostorship was made up after the event to legitimise the rule of Darius, who might not have had the royal blood all the ancients believed he had. This revisionist view is that presented by Holland, though the grounds for it are extremely weak (anyone interested should read the scholarly and thorough demolition of it in the article on Darius in the Encyclopaedia Iranica). Holland is obviously entitled to believe and present any theory he likes, but to foist it as undisputed fact on unsuspecting readers hoping for historical truth is unforgivable.

Describing the upbringing of the Spartan boy, which he unsurprisingly milks for its sensational value, he asserts that “at the age of twelve, he became legal game for cruising” and being “sodomized”, that there were “fines for boys who refused to take a lover”, and the experience of submitting “must have been” traumatic for “most young Spartans.” Each of these phrases is a fine example of how Holland turns all that is known on its head and imposes on the ancient Greeks alien Anglophone assumptions. Actually, it was the men who were fined if they did not take up a boy. “Cruising” is a good example of why Holland’s use of current colloquial English also distorts. It surely suggests seeking out sex likely to be casual, the very opposite of the relationship between the Spartan boy and his lover, which was one of deep and lasting social and legal responsibility, and involved strictly no sex according to our most authoritative witnesses (eg. Xenophon), or very limited sex according to others. No one can possibly know that Spartan boys found being sodomized “traumatic”, since none are known to have been. If they had been, it is fairer to assume they would have experienced it as their other Greek counterparts did: Aristotle discusses the problem of boys liking it too much.

I don’t believe it is necessary for history books to be nearly this misleading to be widely popular, though I admit to thinking that in any case the cost in historical truth and understanding would in any case be too high.

Edmund Marlowe, author of Alexander's Choice, a schoolboy’s story, amazon.com/dp/1481222112
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Mr. Holland is as bias as Herodotus was..

I'll keep this very brief. I bought this book hoping to find some insight into both the Greek states and the Persian Empire, not just the wars. I was dismally disappointed to find that this book has very little to do with Persia and has everything to do with Greece and how great it was. Mr. Hollard talks about how the Greeks defended the West and the Western way of life and made a very entertaining one sided book. Did you know that Persia had a society based upon freedom of religion and outlawed slavery while the Greeks still imposed slavery?

I will however give Mr. Holland credit where credit is due, the book is very well written and it definitely is a page turner. It is the only reason I am giving it two stars. It's sad that Mr. Holland took bias against Persia as do most Western authors and only touched the tip of Persian life/culture. Mr. Holland's bias is inked into the first few pages of his book where he acknowledges all the kind people who took him around Greece. In addition to the plethora of historians and scholars who all helped him were all trained in Greek History and Classics while he only acknowledges one person who took him around Persepolis. That's only one person who contributed to his work on Persian history. Either Mr. Holland is a Persian history expert, or clearly bias. I'm going with clearly bias.

Overall this book is a waste of time in my opinion. If you want to read a book that is bias as herodotus, by all means waste your money. Although the fabricated idea of a dichotomy between Western and Eastern culture and paralleling it to the Greco-Persian wars makes for a really entertaining Hoo-rah book, it is not accurate in the least bit. Western culture has been just as much influenced by Pre-Islamic Persian culture as it has by the Greeks.

It's very sad because this book could have been so much better. Mr Holland is truly a gifted writer and has quite a talent for writing as his passion drips from the page. Unfortunately he decided to stray from the path of academia and create a more entertaining book than an honest one.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An Outstanding Contribution to Ancient Greek History

A little more than a year ago, I read the Iliad for the first time as an adult, for no other reason than my own entertainment. I was at once bitten by the ancient Greek bug and set out to obtain the classical education I somehow missed in high school and college. I pursued this by taking a few Teaching Company audio courses, reading primary sources of the ancients -- Homer, Herodotus, Thucydides -- as well as the best popular and scholarly books I could find to elucidate the various eras of ancient Greek civilization. One of the latter certainly is Tom Holland's Persian Fire.

I came to Persian Fire with a decent background in the overall theme, and I read Herodotus in tandem with it through much of the book, but Holland's treatment enhanced everything I had absorbed prior because he approached the subject with a regional theme. It would be difficult to comprehend the foreign policy of the United States in the latter half of the 20th century without a fairly comprehensive background in the history of the Soviet Union; yet most historians of early fifth century Greece provide scant attention to the foe that most defined their political culture, the Persians they referred to sometimes pejoratively as "the Mede." Holland's work is superior from the get-go because he takes the regional approach most period treatments gloss over.

For those who want to delve right in to the Greco-Persian conflict, patience is in order as Holland sets the stage with an extremely well written background history not only of chief Hellenic city-states Athens and Sparta, but most importantly the origins of Persian rule -- and all of that takes us -- sometimes breathlessly with the gusto of a great author in love with his subject -- to an account of Mediterranean geo-politics on the eve of the conflict. I got more of the sense of the ancient world at the time from Holland than any other single work I had read previously.

Unlike many contemporary historians of the ancient world like Kagan, Holland deliberately avoids trying to fit the themes and the conflicts of 2500 years ago into today's foreign policies, but -- remarkably so -- he does manage to interpret the actions of the key players into the sometimes Machiavellian power politics characteristic of states throughout recorded history. No other work I have encountered brings marble figures like Themistocles and Aristides to flesh-and-blood life, warts and all, the way Holland does in this book.

A great read, in every way. Lots of material and not a boring spot in the story. I'll probably re-read it again someday. If you have any interest at all in the ancient Greek world, don't miss this one!
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointing, biased and inaccurate

A disappointing work. The paperback version describes Mr Holland as a historian and translator. This volume lacks scholarship, is biased and inaccurate. The writing is the work of a skilled story teller fit for documentaries and movie scripts. readers interested in the subject will find several other scholarly books mentioned by other reviewers.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

It was ok

The book is well written and kept me engaged. My problem was that I was expecting it to be primarily about the Persian Empire, I was sadly disappointed. If I had read other reviews or taken the time to read the table of contents then it would have been obvious that this was a history of Persian Empire in relation to Greece and "the battle for the west". It is a well put together book for anyone interested in interaction of Persian empire with Greek city states. If you are looking for something on just the Persian Empire, keep looking.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A thorough and readable history

In his new book, "Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West", Tom Holland performed something of a miracle. Working with the limited original documents that still exist, and extracting material from contemporaries of the events, Holland gives us a very clear picture of the events leading up to and including the clash between the Greeks and Persians. The sweep is enormous, and the cast of characters fascinating. The illustrations and maps that pepper the pages are a big help. This is a must read for anyone interested in history and culture.
6 people found this helpful