Life: A Natural History of the First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth
Life: A Natural History of the First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth book cover

Life: A Natural History of the First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth

Paperback – September 7, 1999

Price
$15.55
Format
Paperback
Pages
400
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0375702617
Dimensions
5.2 x 0.86 x 7.9 inches
Weight
11.6 ounces

Description

From the Inside Flap A New York Times Book Review Editors' Choice"Extraordinary. . . . Anyone with the slightest interest in biology should read this book."-- The New York Times Book Review "A marvelous museum of the past four billion years on earth--capacious, jammed with treasures, full of learning and wide-eyed wonder."-- The Boston Globe From its origins on the still-forming planet to the recent emergence of Homo sapiens--one of the world's leading paleontologists offers an absorbing account of how and why life on earth developed as it did. Interlacing the tale of his own adventures in the field with vivid descriptions of creatures who emerged and disappeared in the long march of geologic time, Richard Fortey sheds light upon a fascinating array of evolutionary wonders, mysteries, and debates. Brimming with wit, literary style, and the joy of discovery, this is an indispensable book that will delight the general reader and the scientist alike."A drama bolder and more sweeping than Gone with the Wind . . . a pleasure to read."-- Science "A beautifully written and structured work . . . packed with lucid expositions of science."-- Natural History A "New York Times Book Review Editors' Choice "Extraordinary. . . . Anyone with the slightest interest in biology should read this book."--"The New York Times Book Review "A marvelous museum of the past four billion years on earth--capacious, jammed with treasures, full of learning and wide-eyed wonder."--"The Boston Globe From its origins on the still-forming planet to the recent emergence of Homo sapiens--one of the world's leading paleontologists offers an absorbing account of how and why life on earth developed as it did. Interlacing the tale of his own adventures in the field with vivid descriptions of creatures who emerged and disappeared in the long march of geologic time, Richard Fortey sheds light upon a fascinating array of evolutionary wonders, mysteries, and debates. Brimming with wit, literary style, and the joy of discovery, this is an indispensable book that will delight the general reader and the scientist alike. "A drama bolder and more sweeping than Gone with the Wind . . . a pleasure to read."--"Science "A beautifully written and structured work . . . packed with lucid expositions of science."--"Natural History Richard Fortey lives in London. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Salterella dodged between the icebergs. While the small boat bucked and tossed, I hung over its side, peering down into the clear Arctic waters. I had not known that there could be such density of life. This frigid sea was a speckled mass of organisms. Tiny copepod crustaceans, looking like so many animated peas, beat their way in their thousands through the surface waters, feeding on plankton that I knew must be there, but which could not be seen without a microscope. There were jellyfish of every size: white, gently pulsing discs as delicate as spun glass; small pink barrage balloons decked with beating cilia, which appeared to be solid--but became gelatinous and impalpable if grasped from the water; an occasional orange monster with tentacles that promised evil stings for fish or mammal. They drifted in their millions, swirling and beating against the dumb tides, concealing purpose in contractions as instinctive as breathing, like protoplasmic lungs dilating and constricting in primitive obedience to the prompting of the currents. Behind the nearest iceberg arctic terns beat and hung in the air, peering down as I was, but with so much more precision, then darting to retrieve some living morsel from the sea. The ice floes were stained pink with their droppings. Salterella was tackling a stretch of sea, Hinlopenstretet, between the islands of Spitsbergen and Nordauslandet far beyond the Arctic Circle at 80 degrees north. Ice floes had melted in the summer thaw, sculpted by the vagaries of weather into plates or crags, or simulacra of giants. On the waterline they were notched deeply by the sea, lapped by insistent waves, and just occasionally one would teeter into instability, cracking and keeling over with a great resigned splash which sent waves to make our small boat buck and grind against the smaller fragments of ice. It was true: the greater part of an ice floe was always beneath the sea, and you approached too close at your peril. If you looked down, you could see the bluish mass curving down into the deeps, while jellyfish skimmed hidden protuberances with impunity. Little Salterella sought the spaces between the floes. Her wooden construction was designed to cope with ice. Winds herded floes into clots that could become almost impenetrable. Then, suddenly, patches of clear water would allow rapid progress, and the bleat of the motor sent little auks and black guillemots fluttering low across the sea to plunder the rich waters elsewhere. In the distance a mysterious coastline lay low on the horizon. Glaciers ran straight down to the sea. Ice cliffs groaned or barked to signal the inexorable creep of sheets of ancient ice. The boat seemed like an interloper.xa0xa0 I was twenty-one and on my first expedition. Cambridge University had a tradition of sending young geologists to Spitsbergen. For a young naturalist it was very heaven. Here there were birds on every side that had only existed as pictures in bird books. The sea, the profligate sea, was a shimmering textbook of zoology. There seemed nothing to interfere with the joy of observation, no end to knowledge, no possibility that any discovery should be less than astounding.xa0xa0 The boat comprised two crew and several scientists, including myself and Geoff. We had already suffered in the old whaling vessel which had carried us from Norway, a switchback ride across the Barents Sea all the way to Spitsbergen. Few on board could face the whale-meat stew. Our expedition leader was the worst sailor of all, having disappeared below decks just after leaving the Norwegian port of Boda, and only reappearing a week later when we reached the base at Longyearbyen.xa0xa0 Geoff and I were to live together for weeks in a small tent, watching our beards grow from speckled patches to whiskers worthy of a Victorian paterfamilias. Together, we were in search of ancient fossils. An expedition from the previous year had stopped off to replenish their water supplies from a melt stream running off the great glacier of Valhallfonna in this remote and unwelcoming northern part of the archipelago. To everyone's surprise, the crew had picked up lumps of dark limestone on the beach that teemed with fossils: trilobites and brachiopods and many unrecognizable things besides. Nobody knew that fossil remains of such animals existed in this part of Spitsbergen. It was all completely new. But there had been no time to investigate that year because the Arctic night was closing in. Perpetual dusk was soon replaced by perpetual night. The few lumps of rock were brought back to Cambridge, and were studied by the great Professor Whittington, who pronounced them very interesting. Thus it was that two students came to be sitting side by side on Salterella looking at swarming jellyfish, and in such serendipitous ways lives are decided. It was 1967. "All You Need Is Love" was top of the hit parade, and stayed there for the whole expedition.xa0xa0 Expeditions are curious things. They last for weeks or sometimes months, during which time they acquire a life of their own, a structure, like a drama. Members of the expedition get to play roles, and the most curious aspect of all is that it is impossible to predict in advance quite what those roles will be. People have to get on together; there is simply no choice. Even pathological personalities have to survive the whole affair. There is, of course, the leader--well, there has to be--who has managed many of these things before. Of an evening, he recounts tales of blizzards past that make the present one seem tame. He knows stories of Nordenskjold and the other great men, who did it all with pemmican and huskies. He legitimizes the whole experience by accommodating the current namby-pamby lot within a great tradition. If you follow in the footsteps of giants, don't you walk taller yourself?xa0xa0 Then there is the expedition joker. He is not necessarily the wittiest man in the party, but he has a knack of igniting humour. Every member of the expedition likes to have him around in the evening. He has a generous gift of appreciating the humour of others, puffing up a glancing remark into hilarity, keeping flagging conversations alive, massaging morale. It is impossible to recall the humour that keeps an expedition afloat. It is concocted by the joker out of nothing and vanishes once more into nothing, but while it is there it seems to be the best thing in the world. The expedition's Practical Man knows how to fix a paraffin stove, or an engine. He can splice a broken guy rope. He can take out splinters, make splints; he can build machines from bits of wire and bottle tops. He is a wonder, as his ham-fisted friends who rely on him never tire of reiterating. I dare say that in ordinary life in suburbia Practical Man may seem a bit of a dullard, but when the outboard engine is failing among the ice floes he has his moment of glory. My own role, a modest one, was that of chef. Our food was nearly all dried: peas, onions, potatoes, rice, oats. Worst of all was the meat bar, 200 grams of dried protein which had to be reconstituted with hot water and which stayed insipid no matter what ingredients you added. Hours of ingenuity went into spinning these ingredients into something spectacular. I tried meat balls, curry, shepherd's pie, patties, pasties and pastries. I bashed them flat, or stuffed them with onion and peas. I married meat bars with oats. I was left undisturbed to follow my arcane trade, which was good news for one incapable of peering at an engine without exhibiting patent confusion. While Practical Man did his vital stuff, the leader led, and the joker cheered up the bystanders, the cook could be quietly abandoned to try to fabricate an onion souffle with powdered milk, flour, yeast extract and dried shallots.xa0xa0 The oddest role in the expedition is that of the scapegoat. His function is to take the blame for everything that goes wrong. A lost wrench? The scapegoat had it last. A leaking tent? You know who damaged the lining. Unexpected bad weather? Whose turn was it to check the weather forecast? Poor scapegoat. Unlike Practical Man, who can usually be identified in advance, there is no telling who will finish up as scapegoat. However, scapegoats have one thing in common: they never realize they are the scapegoat . They tend to be bumptious and self-confident types, convinced equally of their rectitude and their popularity. The scapegoat's function is, however, vital. He personifies mischance. Rather than curse fate, or wonder whether some god is playing tricks on a despised humanity, the scapegoat domesticates and humanizes misfortune. With the scapegoat there, nothing really bad can happen. And if the choice of scapegoat is as it should be, even he is unaware of the role he is playing. Peter enjoyed his expedition to Spitsbergen enormously, unaware that he was being blamed for everything from metal fatigue to blizzards. In this way an expedition defines its members. The identification of parts ensures the success of the whole, a formal intimacy is established, and the job gets done.xa0xa0xa0xa0Geoff and I were eventually dropped off on to the shore of Hinlopenstretet, just the two of us, leaving behind our expedition roles, to find the fossils that had excited the previous year's collectors. It did not take long. In a couple of minutes there was a trilobite showing up all black on a white limestone slab. A few moments later there was another, and then another. The place was prolific! We danced around picking up any piece of rock that attracted our attention. Every rock fragment seemed to have something. This was the delight that animated Howard Carter at the tomb of King Tutankhamun. Nobody had ever seen these creatures before. Our eyes were the first to peer at the primeval rocks, to understand something of the ancient cargo they bore, to wonder at the preservation of extinct creatures on a bleak Arctic shore. In that harsh place there must have been something oddly incongruous about these capering enthusiasts.xa0xa0xa0xa0But the tent had to be pitched. The shoreline was a beach stranded by the last great Ice Age, covered in shingle. The wind never ceased. Our tough tent was called a Whymper after Colonel Whymper, one of the great expeditionists. We tied the guy ropes on to spars that lay on the beach--logs brought in by the North Atlantic Drift to this island far beyond the habitat of any trees except the tiny arctic birch. Then we buried the spars in the shingle. Any gale would have to rip the tree-trunks out from their graves. Air beds and thick, real eiderdown sleeping bags provided such comfort as was to be had. That afternoon even meat bar bonne femme tasted wonderful.xa0xa0xa0xa0There was no night--we were far too far north for that. But the leader had told us how important it was to keep to a regular pattern of sleep and work. If we failed to do so our minds would spin out of their proper biological rhythms; strange distortions of perception might develop. But sleep did not come easily when just a few yards away lay rocks that had never been explored before, our own personal slice of ancient history. Outside the tent, we could hear the ceaseless suck and rattle of the waves on the strand, the mewing of the gulls and the sharp cries of the terns. We had planted a flag on a pole, which chattered like distant gunfire in the incessant wind. Our minds could play, as we lay there, upon the fearsome polar bear, the isbjorn , who could flatten our tent with a single blow, and break a human leg with a single swipe. We even had rifles (of a sort) against his arrival. My feet were always cold when I climbed into the sleeping bag, and I wriggled deliciously in the warm cocoon until a gentle warmth crept slowly into my toes. Then I waited for the unconsciousness that would, finally, steal over me.xa0xa0 When our alarm clock woke us after the obligatory seven hours, we were into our woollen trousers and double anoraks in a rush, and out on to the rocks. Those pieces we had picked up on the beach must have come from rock outcrops beneath the gravel. Within a few minutes we had discovered where these outcrops were. All along the sea's edge there were low ledges of limestone, stacked one of top of the other, dipping down gently towards the water. The movements of the Earth that had long since elevated our ancient rocks had also tipped them gently. Limestone is a sedimentary rock, one that was built beneath ancient seas by the slow accumulation of sediment, making beds each a few inches to a foot or so thick. The top of each bed was a flatfish bedding plane, every one the surface of a former sea floor. So the beds of rocks we were admiring were like the successive pages of a book that recorded ancient time, logging time itself in limy mud that further time had hardened and transmuted into rock. On the bedding planes we could see shadows of trilobites, occasionally something clearer--a tail, perhaps. These fossils were the shells of animals that had once lived upon the sea floor, trapped, like Time itself, as part of the narrative in stone. As we looked along the shore we could see the rock beds dipping in ranks into the distance. Ice floes had come to rest against some of the thicker ribs of rock as they struck out into the sea like groynes, and mist concealed still more distant rocks in enticing obscurity. How much time might be buried here along this desolate shore?xa0xa0 And it was all ours! This stone diary had never been read before. There could be almost anything here, just waiting to be split from its rocky pages. We were standing near the top of the thickness of piled strata, so the beds that dipped towards us along the shore were progressively older the further away from us they were. We knew that as we tapped our way along the shore, so we also tapped our way back into geological time, exploring an older and older past, seeing what came before, and before that again. This simple method had built the whole elaborate edifice of geological time, the sum of a thousand narratives in stone-stacked order. Ancient seas had preserved their history in rocks. In time those rocks themselves would be preyed upon by newer seas, eroding history away again. But enough would survive to tell of life by then vanished, of the endless cycles of climate change, and of the hidden poetry of our mutable world.xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 Time, like an ever-rolling strea,xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0xa0 Bears all its sons away ...In the weeks that followed we broke rock. Every fossil we recovered was logged into its precise place in the historical story. Notebooks were filled, sketches of rock sections were scribbled. Each specimen was wrapped in newspaper and tucked into a canvas collecting bag, and then the bags were collected into the same boxes from which we had taken our food. Out came porridge oats and dried meat, back went fossils. And months later I unwrapped with tremulous hands the little parcels which we had wrapped so laboriously when our fingers had still been stiff with cold.xa0xa0 The tools we used were geological hammers, tough enough to withstand endless battering without splintering, and hand lenses to peer closely at our finds. Some of our finds peered back, because certain trilobites had preserved the oldest eyes--convex, compound eyes, some as large as those of a dragonfly and with myriad polygonal lenses. We looked at one another for the first time, those trilobites and us, though hundreds of millions of years apart, and I understood that there could scarcely be a better metaphor for discovery. We soon found out that these trilobites had to be Ordovician (that is, about 480 million years old) because a few of them had relatives which we recognized from other sites, and some of the limestone beds also contained the fossils of graptolites, a well-known kind of extinct planktonic animal, which changed with every geological period in ways that students had to memorize. How glad we were then that we had drubbed into our brains the litany of species that spelled out geological time. But even with the little we knew we could see that there were types of fossil in these rocks that had never been seen before. We did not know what to call them, so we gave them nicknames--undergraduate-ish names like Mildred and Fred. Some years later they received the blessing of a scientific name, latinate and slightly pompous as they are supposed to be: Cloacaspis or Svalbardites . But the nicknames will be remembered, because they were generated in the hectic enthusiasm of those early days.xa0xa0 Sometimes the weather could no longer be ignored. Spitsbergen seems to be home to all the deepest meteorological depressions. One could imagine some Norse saga peopling its wet and inaccessible shores with carbuncular and bad-tempered trolls. Even in the middle of summer it was swept with squalls and driving drizzle. Specially small musk oxen live on the south of the island, sustained by meagre vegetation which would make the tundra seem lush. The struggle for existence was graven on the shores of Hinlopenstretet, too, where bones of stranded whales seemed to provide the only nourishment for an impoverished flora. Tiny arctic poppies huddled in hollows, and purple saxifrages seemed almost indecently colourful in a monochrome world. We were even too far north for mosquitoes (a blessing). The sheer joy of discovery usually kept the cold at bay: but even thick woollen gloves soon became tattered against the sharp rocks, and as our hair and beards grew we came to look more and more like dervishes belonging to some hermetic sect, especially if we jumped up and down to celebrate an unexpected find.xa0xa0 But a blizzard could not be faced out. We crawled into the tent and into our sleeping bags without even taking off our sweaters, and stayed there for several days. The howling wind mercilessly undid the good work of the summer thaw, plastering snow over rocks that had only just begun to yield up their secrets. This was when we discovered why the leader had recommended bringing War and Peace and The Brothers Karamazov . We got out of bed only to perform the most vital bodily functions, an unkind compromise between biological necessity and fear of frostbite of the private organs in which decorousness had little part to play.xa0xa0 Back in the feathered haven of my sleeping bag I could hear the sea lashing against the shingle. The waves that broke on the cold, grey arctic stones would have sounded the same in the Ordovician or the Jurassic. The sound was audible proof of the endurance of the sea.xa0xa0 The cauldron of life I had admired from Salterella was a different life--another set of animals, another ecology--from the life we had been hacking out of the rocks for the first time. There were no living trilobites, nor any Ordovician terns. Yet the sea endured. It was one constant in a fickle biosphere. The sea was cradle to the Ordovician animals which we were discovering: it succoured them while they were alive, and ultimately it provided for their entombment. I visualized the trilobite crawling over a soft mud nearly 500 million years earlier. Perhaps it died while it was moulting, overcome by noxious gases emanating from the sulphurous sediment. The hard carapace remained to record the life it had led, an archive of calcium carbonate, a shell for eternity. More fine mud covered the carapace, and as the millennia passed the beds above were slowly accreted. Occasionally, a tempest would dump more mud in a day than had accumulated for a century or more. Eventually, the pile of sediment hardened as its water was pressed out, and then followed the long annealing of geological time, millions of years, not mere thousands, before it became the dark rock I was now exploring. But still it carried its precious cargo. The chances of my making a connection with the fossil were still remote, because a hundred thousand incidents lay between the life of this humble invertebrate and my own--not least, if the hammer had fallen in a slightly different place the fossil might never have told its story. And consider what intervened between the Ordovician and the blizzard raging outside the tent: three ice ages, the deaths of a dozen continents and the birth of a dozen more, earthquakes and earth movements, mountain ranges thrown up and then eroded deep into their roots, the rise of fish and dinosaurs, the dramatic demise of the latter, bombardments of the Earth from space, and all the tangled skein of life winding around the changing terrestrial world like partners in a pas de deux . Chance and the consequences of chance ruled a blow of hammer on rock, arranging an assignation with history.xa0xa0 Fortuitous or not, this trilobite represented one moment in geological time, and within the section of rocks exposed along the Arctic shore a thousand preceding or subsequent moments were recorded. The story of geological time is pieced together from thousands of such fragments; some have been known for 200 years, others were recorded only yesterday. The rocks in Spitsbergen were my own little piece of the story--a doctorate's worth, if you like. The great narrative of geological time is a patchwork, a stitching-together of odd fragments with partial vistas, idiosyncratic, a tale put together by heroes and journeymen. And this narrative has a language of its own, the divisions of geological time that soon trip off the tongue with the ready familiarity of a railway timetable. Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, and so on, up the geological column, each of these again subdivided finely and more finely, the better to approximate history. It is an astonishing story, a tale of more than 3,500 million years. Consider what has happened since the death of Napoleon: the interpretations, the parade of historical facts, the controversies; and it will be obvious that a history more than ten million times as long can never be known, even in outline. And when this history has been stitched together from small pieces taken from rock sections where chance has had a part in the glance of every hammer blow, it will be certain that this history is a poor thing, an approximate story peddled by optimists.xa0xa0xa0xa0The blizzard was over. We could return to our patient battering of the Ordovician rocks. A routine settled in, as regular as any office worker's. The alarm clock would wake us. A ritual curse about the weather and it was time to make the porridge--breakfast was always porridge. We used water from a melt stream, and would throw in raisins to make it more exciting. (A peculiar thing had happened to our taste buds. We loved the porridge to be very sweet--we poured granulated sugar over it until it was crusted. In civilized conditions it would have made us sick, but in this cold waste our bodies were hungry for calories in the most blatant form and the glutinous stuff tasted good.) We gobbled it down. Then to work. If we were working near by we could come back for lunch; if not, we put a few lifeboat biscuits into our pockets, and a bar of chocolate, and that would have to suffice for the day. Unless the weather was particularly miserable we would spend most of our time collecting the new fossil fauna, systematically, from each successive rock bed. Every so often something new or spectacular would turn up, prompting cries of delight, and then the lucky finder would hold it out for the other to admire. But the incessant wind was troubling. It never seemed to stop sweeping over the naked gravel of the vast, raised beach on which we lived. Although the temperature was above freezing the chill factor was dangerous; even with balaclavas and wind-proof jackets, woollen pullovers and woollen combinations that would have seemed old-fashioned to our grandparents the cold still managed to sneak in. At first we wore wellington boots: we often had to trudge for miles through slushy snow, and it was essential to keep the feet dry. But when we stopped walking a profound iciness would creep into the toes, and once it had taken control it was implacable until we climbed into our sleeping bags at the end of the day. It was a big moment when we discovered the mukluks in our supply boxes. These were a kind of giant canvas boot lined with felt--an Eskimo invention. They trapped the heat wonderfully well. Then it was only the fingers that ached with the chill. We were supplied with tins of Three Castles cigarettes made by W. D. & H. 0. Wills of Bristol, and I would light up, trembling behind whatever bluff I could find, as much for the brief moment of heat as for the nicotine.xa0xa0xa0xa0From time to time there would be visitors. On the calmest day of all a walrus paid us a visit, cruising up and down the strait, and diving to grub up his favourite clam, the arctic Mya , a good-sized morsel the size of a large mussel. Every time he surfaced he would display his great tusks and blow out a massive, splashy breath, like some old colonel puffing outrage at intrusive strangers. Tiny, albino arctic foxes would appear as if from nowhere. They would eat anything, even our discarded porridge. We were so remote (or they were so hungry) that they seemed to be almost tame, even though their fur was hunted. I suppose their usual diet was the eggs and chicks of birds. They disappeared as quickly as they had come.xa0xa0xa0xa0There was never a time without birds. They skimmed incessantly along the shore, battling purposefully against the wind: fulmars, effortless and aerodynamically perfect, flirting with the sea surface; terns, more laboured, beating hard sometimes to make progress. Least welcome were the skuas, those unappealing parasites. They lurked on the strand, and then relentlessly pursued some unfortunate gull, harrying and diving at the creature until it regurgitated its meal. The gull's final indignity was to have the contents of its evacuated crop swallowed in mid-air by its tormentor. The rich production of the Arctic sea supported all these animals. They were one with the pulsating jellyfish.xa0xa0xa0xa0Geoff and I established a kind of working cordiality. With the arbitrariness which is part of an expedition, we had been chosen for our enthusiasm for palaeontology rather than any predictable compatibility. The truth was that we were as different as could be in every regard except for our love of fossils. After the expedition I do not think we ever spoke again. But while we were together we were obliged to share every belch and indiscretion. We evolved strategies. We talked about what we had found, naturally, and what we should collect that day. We talked about what we could do with the meat bars that evening, wondering whether we could perhaps make kebabs if we could only improvise glue out of flour. We speculated about the other members of the expedition. We made comments about the comparative odorousness of our socks. It was an odd, jokey relationship that was proximal without being intimate. I imagine it had the kind of closeness of a moderately successful arranged marriage.xa0xa0xa0xa0We had chatted only briefly on the long cruise up the Norwegian coast. From the north of Norway we had crossed the Maelstrom together, past the Lofoten Islands to Bear Island, the most forsaken lump of rock in the world. Wild-eyed radio station operators had loomed out of the mist there to take off their supplies, comprising tinned food and whisky in approximately equal parts. A special breed of escapist seeks these places out--men (they are always men) who can only function at the edges of things, in a kind of solitary confinement, men who find the company of others difficult, and move and move again, motivated by a kind of inverse gregariousness, to where they can be almost alone. I was to meet their kind again in the Australian outback. This longing for solitude is apparently a progressive condition. After a while it is no longer enough to man the radio station with others: the committed loner seeks the chance to overwinter in some outstation, absolutely isolated. I met one man who had done just this: he had been confined by cold and darkness at the edge of the world for months. He told me wryly, almost sadly, that he had returned to Norway but found the crowds in Hammerfest, Norway's most northerly town, almost unbearable, and returned to Spitsbergen by the next available boat. Even as he talked to me I could see that his eyes were disengaged, looking out over the pack ice to where seclusion lay.xa0xa0xa0xa0So Geoff and I developed a relationship which was an expedition relationship. But Geoff was a year my senior--he had completed his finals shortly before we left for the Arctic. Because of this year's difference I was Geoff's assistant, the hired hand--and at first he made the field strategy. But things were to change, because of another stroke of chance that would transform both our lives.xa0xa0xa0xa0We were finding more and more new species, not just one but dozens. These trilobites were without names, a whole fauna through an uncharted stretch of geological time that had never been known before. As our collections grew, so did the realization that there was a lot of work here, just to make these new animals known. And how did they fit into the Ordovician world? How did they live? Just as, a metre or so away, the sea was profligate with variety, so, it seemed, was the Ordovician one--laid out upon plate after plate of rock before our inquisitive eyes. There were more fossil animals yet: snails and nautili and sponges and curious squiggles that defied our knowledge. Clearly, life in the sea had been a cornucopia of variety hundreds of millions of years before our hammers broke open its hidden plenty.xa0xa0xa0xa0The excitement of discovery cannot be bought, or faked, or learned from books (although learning always helps). It is an emotion which must have developed from mankind's earliest days as a conscious animal, similar to the feeling when prey had successfully been stalked, or a secret honeycomb located high in a tree. It is one of the most uncomplicated and simple joys, although it soon becomes mired in all that other human business of possessiveness and greed. But the discovery of some beautiful new species laid out on its stony bed provokes a whoop of enthusiasm that can banish frozen fingers from consideration, and make a long day too short. It is not just the feeling that accompanies curiosity satisfied--it is too sharp for that; it arises not from that rational part of the mind that likes to solve crosswords, but from the deep unconscious. It hardly fades with the years. It must lie hidden and unacknowledged beneath the dispassionate prose of a thousand scientific papers, which are, by convention, filleted of emotion. It is the reason why scientists and archaeologists persist in searches which may even be doomed and unacknowledged by their fellows.xa0xa0xa0xa0The urge to collect is different. It is clearly a deep urge also, because collected objects have been a part of human culture almost from its beginnings. There is even a Grotte du Trilobite, near Les Eyzies in France, a cave in which one of the earliest Europeans secreted a trilobite as a revered relic. Collecting is more than hoarding. Children will collect seashells from the beach, and rigorously sort them into types, by colour and design. They feel it is important, somehow, to get it right and, having done so, to keep the result. This kind of personal museum is part of the way we define ourselves, an archive of self, and is not mere covetousness or "stamp collecting." Children need to classify things in order to get a grasp upon the world. Discrimination and identification have value beyond the obvious separation of edible from poisonous, valuable from worthless, or safe from dangerous. This is a means to gain an appreciation of the richness of the environment and our human place within it. The variety of the world is the product of hundreds of millions of years of evolution, of catastrophes survived, and of ecological expansion. To begin to grasp any of this complexity the first task is to identify and recognize its component parts: for biologists, this means the species of animals and plants, both living and extinct. And to begin to negotiate this astonishing diversity a reference is needed, a sample of one species to compare with the next: in short, a collection. We start to understand our history by seeking to collect and classify. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A
  • New York Times Book Review
  • Editors' Choice"Extraordinary. . . . Anyone with the slightest interest in biology should read this book."--
  • The New York Times Book Review
  • "A marvelous museum of the past four billion years on earth--capacious, jammed with treasures, full of learning and wide-eyed wonder."--
  • The Boston Globe
  • From its origins on the still-forming planet to the recent emergence of Homo sapiens--one of the world's leading paleontologists offers an absorbing account of how and why life on earth developed as it did. Interlacing the tale of his own adventures in the field with vivid descriptions of creatures who emerged and disappeared in the long march of geologic time, Richard Fortey sheds light upon a fascinating array of evolutionary wonders, mysteries, and debates. Brimming with wit, literary style, and the joy of discovery, this is an indispensable book that will delight the general reader and the scientist alike."A drama bolder and more sweeping than Gone with the Wind . . . a pleasure to read."--
  • Science
  • "A beautifully written and structured work . . . packed with lucid expositions of science."--
  • Natural History

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(61)
★★★★
25%
(51)
★★★
15%
(30)
★★
7%
(14)
23%
(46)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

light-hearted book is serious disappointment

This kind of book gives popular science a bad name. I believe popular science should tell you something about science, albeit in an entertaining and accessible way. While the book is entertaining for the most part, I came away feeling as if I had not learned much at all.
A much-cited criticism of the book is that the author digresses into many personal anecdotes. This is true. Many are entertaining, a few are even enlightening, but too many take up space in a book that is already too short to do justice to the topic. For example, Fortey spends two pages telling us what he thought of Thailand while he was doing fieldwork there. We discover that the food was hot enough to make his nose run, but that blowing your nose in public is taboo in Thailand. Such conflict! He hides scraps of rolled-up newspaper in his pants pocket to deal with this crisis. The climax of the story: a female lounge singer touches him on his thigh, is startled by a roll, and wonders what it might be. Being a scientist myself, reading this made me feel like I was cornered by an awkward colleague at a cocktail party and was desperately trying to avoid another self-indulgent anecdote. This is one example of many that you will have to wade through to get to some natural history.
On a happier note, Fortey does a reasonable job conjuring up images of worlds long past. He can describe the tropical jungles of the dinosaurs or more exotic landscapes well enough to give you some idea of what it would feel like. Even here, however, he often throws in a lame simile: "...where now there beats a sun that melts ice as fast as a hot frying pan melts butter". Cringe.
I did learn a few things, however. The section describing the geological evidence for a meteor that causes the extinction of the dinosaurs was a high point. If you don't already know something about what the Cambrian Explosion is (I did), you will learn that too. I suppose any book on the subject will inevitably have some sparse educational value. It is telling, however, that there is no chronological chart that lays out the many geological periods, eras, and so on that we encounter in this book. Also, many species, classes, and orders are mentioned without any definition about what sets them apart. A tree of relationships would have been nice. Evidently, Fortey is not much concerned that we learn or understand any of this.
Overall, Fortey underestimates and disappoints his audience. The book feels like it is supposed to entertain fidgety teenagers with glitz rather than inform educated adults.
[Reviewer's Background: I am an atmospheric scientist, but someone who has never taken a course in paleontology. This is the first book I have read on natural history.]
52 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Fascinating and Frustrating

It didn't take me very long to figure out that the author had left out of this otherwise engaging and enlightening book the one thing that would prove most helpful to its readers struggling to put this vast amount of information in context- a chart showing the names of the various eras and periods. (The copy I read came from the library, and I took the liberty of creating a chart of the chronology in Excel, cribbed from "What Evolution Is" by Ernst Mayr, and leaving a copy of it on page 1 for the next reader.) Compounding this difficulty is Mr. Fortey's relatively haphazard organization of the material and sparse leavening of information that helps place it in context. For example, at one point in the book, he references dates of 2.5 billion years, and suddenly the book jumps to the Cambrian era of roughly 850 million years ago, with no real attempt to impress that scale upon the reader.
The author almost deliberately seems to have wanted to avoid the burden of actually `educating' his audience, preferring instead to plop down next to him or her at some far-off pub and tell stories, leading a meandering tour of the best spots here and there. The tour is in chronological order, but never is the necessity of actually knowing the relative chronology foisted onto the reader. It almost feels as though to Dr. Fortey, `education' is a dirty word - too much the dull, plodding stuff of daily life and not much fun.
But I disagree with this approach - though this book was written for a non-professional audience, it is still, I presume, an audience that would like to feel they have learned something. Not being able to place most of the insights in this book into a context or framework undercut this goal and he compounded this error through a circumambulatory writing style, replete with cryptic-sounding creatures whose place in life's strata is fleshed out only sparsely. Additionally, though there are three sections of black and white photographs, there were a number of places where a simple diagram or some other graphic would have done wonders for my comprehension.
Nevertheless, through my frustration at this book's failings, I was able to glean some worthwhile insight from this book. And while no one would accuse Dr. Fortey of crafting clear, readable and professional prose, his words do allow his natural enthusiasm (and a bit of hubris) to show through. I was delighted at some of the windows which Dr. Fortey opens onto the methods and history of paleontology, and fascinated by his discussion of recent thinking on which creature first struck out onto the land after billions of years in the water. All in all, one could do worse, but as I am beginning to read "Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billion Years of Evolution on Earth" by Andrew Knoll, it is already clear to me that one could also do a good deal better.
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

More digression than meat

About 80% digression, 20% (if that) actual writing on the history of life. I am a layperson, but I honestly could not tell you what, if anything, I learned about early life from this book. Fortey seems far more preoccupied with the trappings of being a scientist than he is with the science itself.

Buy this book if you want to know about the quality of the eggs served at Fortey's favorite bed and breakfast, "...the perfect bed and breakfast in a Tudor house with flag floors and improbable staircases. [The] breakfast was neither too much nor too little, the egg yolks were soft and the whites were cooked, the toast warm and cut into triangles on which to spread thick, home-made marmalade, and pots of tea arrived unbidden." (ACTUAL QUOTE from page 143 of Fortey hitting peak digression in a chapter on early terrestrial plant life.)

I can not understand how this book came to be known as such a touchstone on the topic.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A natural history of life on earth

It's hard to imagine a more ambitious project than writing a natural history of the first four billion years of life on earth. It's even harder to imagine writing it for the interested layperson without making too many oversimplifications or leaving out too much important detail in a book with just over 300 pages. Richard Fortey has risen to the occasion though, and in the process has created a book that's engaging and highly worth reading.
You might expect a book like this to be mechanistic, starting at the beginning and cranking by rote through the sequence of events that constitute the earth's history. Fortey doesn't do this. In a cordial and poetic style he first introduces us to the real world of paleontology. A world of dirt, grime and fierce winds on forsaken beaches bordering forgotten islands of the far north. This is where Fortey began his carrier, and where he made a first mark in the study of extinct organisms from earth's ancient past. This first chapter is important because it reminds us that our knowledge of earth's history has come in fitful starts in which chance and luck have played a central roll. Only a fraction of all creatures leave fossilized remains, only a fraction of those are ever found, and even then they must be interpreted through the preconceptions of scientists. The miracle is that we know anything at all - but we do, and what a story it is.
Having introduced the working of paleontology, Fortey devotes the second chapter to the origin of the first life forms. This chapter is of necessity the most barren of all. We still don't understand the origin of life, though there have been remarkable strides in recent years. The author describes the central importance of carbon and the fact many carbon-based molecules necessary for life are found in extraterrestrial objects (but he does not advocate the idea that first life was extraterrestrial). He makes a strong point for the proposition that all life originated with a common ancestor.
Much of Fortey's discussions about first life discuss the roll that life played in creating our current environment. The atmosphere is literally a created thing, with the oxygen we breathe constituting a poisonous gas given off by the first organisms on earth. This makes creatures like the chemolithoautotrophic hyperthermophiles a little more understandable - first life evolved in an environment that we today would find very inhospitable - and vise versa.
From here the book pretty much follows in chronological order with the Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian and Carboniferous periods. The author explains how life first evolved in the seas, how it flourished, about extinction, and the eventual migration of life onto land. Fortey does not simply recite history, though. He has a style that brings these ancient animals and ecosystems to life. I particularly enjoyed his recollection of conodonts. Conodonts are tooth-like objects of calcium phosphate that were used for years as a type of natural chronometer. They belonged to an extinct aquatic animal. They changed as the animal evolved over time and their presence in sedimentary deposits thus enabled scientists to date the rocks in which they were found. The problem was, nobody knew what animal the conodonts belonged too. There was much speculation, and Fortey's telling of the story and its eventual resolution is typical of the way he brings the subject to life.
Through all the narrative Fortey does a reasonably good job of helping the reader understand that life did not march onward and upward along a directed path. This is a common misunderstanding, and one that chronological narratives often give. Life did not emerge from the seas and then rise to the air. Rather, like an expanding gas, life evolved to fill unoccupied niches. The simplest and oldest life forms still flourish, and if longevity is the measure by which life is accounted, then we are just upstarts with our few-million-year presence on earth.
There is, of course, the story of the dinosaurs. The neat twist offered by Fortey is to show how our understanding and perception of the dinosaurs has changed over time. He compares what we know of them today with how we perceived them years ago. I found this particularly interesting because I can recall as a little boy reading how dinosaurs were slow, had two brains (one in the head and one in the tail) and had to live in water to support their weight. Observing how our perceptions of dinosaurs have change so dramatically in my lifetime is a real-life dramatization of science at work.
The dinosaurs have changed our understanding of evolution as well. In times past dinosaurs were synonymous with failure to evolve and change - they disappeared because they were outmoded. Fortey explains how luck and chance are essential parts of the evolutionary process. The dinosaurs were superbly adapted animals. They are gone because of bad luck - a bolide from space - and we are here because some nondescript little mammals just happened to be lucky enough have the right equipment for surviving in the new environment. What had been good for survival changed in an instant, and changed the course of evolution.
The book ends with a chapter describing the search for our past and an epilogue on chance and evolution. This is a pretty brief chapter that summarizes the fossil evidence for human evolution and describes our earliest ancestors down to roughly the last ice age.
I truly enjoyed reading this book. It is well written and it has a useful glossary and a very complete index. The style of writing is informative yet colorful and full of imagery. Written by someone with an obvious zest for life - "Life" is a top-caliber book and one you won't regret investing the time to read and savor.
Duwayne Anderson, February 22, 2000
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Incoherent and poorly reasoned

Incoherent. This book wanders seemingly at random. Travelog? Literary criticism? Science? History of? Behavior studies? I might well want to read any one of these, at various times. What I am not interested in, is a book that wanders from one to the other.

Poorly reasoned. The author steps from the observed facts of commonalities at the genome level, to the fairly safe conclusion that all earthly life has common ancestry, but then leaps to the absolutely unjustified conclusion that "life [on earth] happened once and only once". Nonsense: the evidence does not rise to that level. For one thing, life could just as easily have started 1000 times and been extinguished by inferno in the early bombardment period. And, it should be well known to the author that there was no single tree of descent for unicellular life - they routinely exchange genetic material and have even combined to form more complex cells. Pardon me, but there is plenty of room in that history for multiple geneses to have been obscured by early exchanges and combinations.

So, the author can't write straight and can't think straight - regretfully, I find that I for one have no use for this work.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Fitting title for a rewarding read

Successfully melding personal adventure with good science and skilled narrative techniques,
Fortey's book compels attention. "An Unauthorized Biography" is a telling catch phrase
conveying the idea that paleontology is a dynamic science. New ideas emerge almost with
every fossil discovery and dogmatic thoughts have no place in the science. As a professional
paleontologist [ i almost said "practicing", but his approach is far to serious for that!]. he has
all the qualifications to relate this story. With the growing number of general level books on
the development of life being released recently, it's difficult to choose among them. This book
certainly ranks among the top choices.
Quite simply, this book is what it claims to be: a history of 3 500 million years of earth's plant
and animal inhabitants. Fortey achieves masterful balance between presenting general
themes with illustrative details. In one example, he shows the value of mites in soil
development and what their loss would mean to global environment. The unspoken message
about the use of pesticides is a silent outcry for us to recognize such details.
Merged with the scientific work of many researchers are Fortey's accounts of his personal
experiences as a paleontologist. His scenario of the scientific conference makes compelling
reading for anyone wishing to grasp the underlying themes of scientific conflicts. Reaching
beyond his own work, he introduces us to many noteworthy colleagues. Few are criticized
for the value of their work, but their personal habits are subjected to pointed comments.
None of these are out of place; Fortey clearly mourns the loss of colleagues who would have
continued producing welcome results had they not been lost. On the other hand, some
contemporaries are given short shrift: although Graham Cairns Smith's proposal of clay
crystals providing the template for replicating molecules is well described, his name appears
neither in the text nor the brief bibliography.
Fortey's chapter on mammalian evolution among the finest in print. His awareness is global,
not limited to a few well-known sites. He ranges over both time and place with skilled ease,
giving the reader vivid pictures of scenarios in life's past. He's comfortable with geology,
biology and genetics. In particular, the Australian conditions over time are well drawn, an
exception to many of the books of this genre. Australia, of course, brings up the issue of
marsupials contrasted with placentals. The adaptive strengths of marsupials should have
given them a competitive edge with placental species, but remained mostly isolated on the
island continent.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

best general book on paleontology I ever read

While many books focus exclusively on dinosaurs (not that I don't love them to death mind you) they often fail to discuss those plants and animals that shared their world, as well as came before and after this mighty creatures. Fortey in a wonderful, informative, well-written, and highly readable book details the history of life on earth from its origin to the last ice age. He brings to light (and life) many topics not as well known to the popular follower of things paleontological, such as the discovery of diverse faunas in the late Precambrian, debates over the nature and importance of the Burgess Shale fauna, and issues over the origination of the first land vertebrates. He discusses in an authoritative but easily understood manner some of the lesser known but none the less important organims in earth's past, many of which are I weren't familiar with, such as graptolites and conodonts.
Fortey intersperses his wonderful text with personal ancedotes from his years in the field - he is an expert on all things trilobite - as well as asides from the history of paleonotology as a science. Not distracting, but fun to read and really show how paleontology exists as a field and a profession.
I found the book quite delightful and highly recommend it. I look forward to reading his book on trilobites, which I am sure is excellent as well. Fortey shows there is more to prehistoric life than dinosaurs (though he does cover them too), and what wonderful life that was.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Fine Introduction to Natural History

This book has just been reprinted (2008) in an illustrated edition by the prestigious Folio Society of Great Britain; so if you want to see what many early life forms actually looked like as you read Fortey's compelling prose, you should look for that version. Take note that since this book was first published several years ago, gently used hardcover editions may be a better bargain than the cheapest paperback! (This is hardly unique, either!)
A few sticklers and curmudgeons have given this great book two stars because there are a few anecdotes dispersed throughout the work, but even they admit that the other 95% of the book is a well written introduction to the emerging, ongoing saga of life on earth. This book is written in the manner of a lecture at a university, in which the professor engages and entertains the students, spicing the "meat" with some flavor to maintain their attention. It works exactly as intended. Even the misanthropes mentioned above admit that the anecdotes are often humorous, but they like to believe that people will read a science book made of nothing but soggy sawdust! Thanks anyway, I'll take it this way.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Only on page 31 but having my doubts.

Yes it's unfair to review a book after only 31 pages; moving on then.

Firstly, Forget has grievously erred not once but twice by asserting that the heavier elements in the universe were formed during the big bang. They of course were not. Most of the elements beyond helium were formed in the interior of stars or during supernova. Granted , this is not a book about astronomy but still, this is common scientific knowledge.

Secondly, there are religious overtones which have no place in a book of science: "The placement of the Earth in the firmament, and its pivoting in the solar system, are fine-tuned to make life a possibility. If life is just a matter of chance, then the dice were loaded in its favor".

Whoa, "danger Will Robinson!".

Then later when speaking about early meterorite bombardment, "It is equally clear that in that searing genesis life could not spring up spontaneously, for these donors also serve to sterilize the surface of the planet even as they donated the ingredients of creation. As described in the Bible, it was like a refiner's fire"
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A mixture -- memoirs and science

I have rather enjoyed the book, and am most of the way through it.

Criticisms in a number of the other reviews did not dissuade me from reading it, since I am not a scientist, just a layman with a lively curiosity.

I did enjoy the many aspects of the fossil record that Fortey develops, such as the rigors of seeking fossil materials in the inaccessible places on earth, the rivalry and politics of science, and even biographical tidbits explaining his own motivation to be come a paleontologist.

As for science, there's a lot of it, including numerous photographic plates showing fossils, many of them quite striking. The difficulty level is manageable by anyone with a few high school or college science survey courses.

Other reviewers were very unhappy with pages spent describing landscapes and cultures of the far-away places where Fortey did his primary research. In truth, these "interludes" tended to mitigate the difficult reading that usually accompanied his monologs on species variation and radiation.

Fortey by his own admission is a specialist in Precambrian and Cambrian Eras. To write a survey of life on the planet Earth, he therefore must pass forward into geographic strata well out of his primary expertise. Perhaps partly for that reason, I most enjoyed his survey of early life, including Archaean bacteria, Ediacaran life forms, and the Cambrian explosion of phyla as documented in the Burgess shale.

This book may not be satisfactory for persons highly knowledgeable about the geologic record who wanted more "straight science" and thus wrote adverse reviews, but it is very appropriate for someone like me -- a person interested in surveying the "big picture" of life on Earth from its beginnings to the present. A person who might be described as an interested layman.

This is a big book, and parts of it are challenging. However, I recommend it consistent with the cautions I've outlined here.

One problem NOT present is Mr. Fortey's lack of credentials as a scientist. He has an impeccable background. If a book like this were written by a "science popularizer" without the credentials, I would be skeptical. As it is, his writing style reminds me of Loren Eiseley, who mixed personal musing with science writing, and is very highly respected.

This book needs some time. It is thick and far from light reading. Try it when the winter winds blow and the snow is piled deep outside.
5 people found this helpful