Short-listed for thexa0Man Booker International Prizexa0 A New York Times Editors' Choice New York Times , Paperback Row "[A] magnificent novel… Oz pitches the book's heartbreak and humanism perfectly from first page to last, as befits a writer who understands how vital a political role a novelist can play."— New York Times Book Review "In this novel of nineteen-sixties Jerusalem, Shmuel Ash, lovelorn graduate student and lukewarm socialist, abandons his thesis ('Jewish Views of Jesus') to care for a frail, elderly Zionist living in a funeral villa. There he meets a cynical beauty who lost both her father and husband in the mid-century wars, backroom and battlefield, that defined the contours of Israeli statehood. The novel has a clear message; as Shmuel says, 'All the power in the world cannot transform someone who hates you into someone who likes you.' But Oz tempers this didactic edge by making Shmuel a hapless figure—with walking stick, inhalers, and baby-powdered beard—unimpressive to the aristocratic recluses he's stumbled among."— The New Yorker , "Briefly Noted" "A novel of ideas...Beautifully translated by Nicholas de Lange."— New York Review of Books "Even an annus horribilis can be redeemed if it contains a new Amos Oz novel."— The Forward "An intellectual biography of Judas, a tender narrative of love and heartbreak, and a thoughtful consideration of the stakes and limits of Israeli politics.”— The Christian Century "Oz’s prose, as captured in English by de Lange, illuminates an exquisite coming-of-age romance that also manages to comment on the origins of Zionism, the perception of the Israeli left and what it truly means to be a traitor."— Jewish Telegraphic Agency "Like Oz's nonfiction "A Tale of Love and Darkness," "Judas" grapples with big, historical matters for which there are no simple answers: the founding of Israel and the founding of Christianity. Both remain rich subjects to explore today." — St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Best Books of 2016" "A scintillating novel...Many-layered, thought-provoking and – in its love story – delicate as a chrysalis, this is an old-fashioned novel of ideas that is strikingly and compellingly modern." — Observer “Oz has written one of the most triumphant novels of his career.” — The Forward “ Judas is a vibrant specimen of a nearly extinct species, the novel of ideas...A fascinating coming-of-age story."— San Francisco Chronicle "The novel gives a finely vivid and sympathetic picture of a Jerusalem (and an Israel) that has largely disappeared…This book is compassionate as well as painfully provocative, a contribution to some sort of deeper listening to the dissonances emerging from deep within the politics and theology of Israel and Palestine.” — New Statesman “A very absorbing addition to [Oz’s] remarkable oeuvre.” — The Guardian “A masterpiece: command of the word, mastery of construct, the ability to stimulate all the senses of the reader.”— La Repubblica “Challenging, complex and strangely compelling… The ideas at the novel’s centre have great vitality and force. The philosophical passages bristle with linguistic energy…vividly conveyed in Nicholas de Lange’s translation.”— Spectator "A [big] beautiful novel...Funny, wise, and provoking."— The Times “JUDAS is a great novel that only Oz could have written…perhaps his finest work. Whether or not it is his swansong, it should win Amos Oz the ultimate accolade.”— Standpoint Magazine "After almost two dozen books that track changes in both heart and state with untiring strength and subtlety, the Israeli master has delivered one of the boldest of all his works...Nicholas de Lange, Oz's distinguished translator, steers these virtuoso transitions between debate and domesticity with unerring skill...Oz can imagine, and inhabit, treachery of every stripe. But he keeps faith with the art of fiction."— Financial Times "[It is] rich in material to grapple with. Oz engages with urgent questions while retaining his right as a novelist to fight shy of answers: it's a mark of his achievement that the result isn't frustrating but tantalising."— Daily Telegraph "Earnestly bedded in Israeli history and politics, Oz's novel fights to suggest that sometimes the so-called traitors might be heroes."— Sunday Times "Mingling with compassion and provocation as Oz explores betrayal, war and desire…He’ll no doubt be overlooked for the Nobel Prize yet again next month – this novel shows just how ludicrous that is." —Mail on Sunday "Through the story of one young man at a crossroads, Oz presents thought-provoking ideas about traitors, a moving lament for the cost of Israeli-Arab conflict, and a heartfelt call for compassion." — Publishers Weekly "Oz xa0widely considered Israel's greatest living writer...is the equal of Kundera in depicting the kind of love that is accompanied more by sighs of impatience and reproval than of desire satisfied.xa0Lovely, though with a doleful view of the possibilities of peace, love, and understanding, whether among nations or within households." — Kirkus From the Inside Flap The great new novel by Amos Oz, his first full-length work since the best-selling A Tale of Love and Darkness Jerusalem, 1959. Shmuel Ash, a biblical scholar, is adrift in his young life when he finds work as a caregiver for a brilliant but cantankerous old man named Gershom Wald. There is, however, a third, mysterious presence in his new home. Atalia Abravanel, the daughter of a deceased Zionist leader, a beautiful woman in her forties, entrances young Shmuel even as she keeps him at a distance. Piece by piece, the old Jerusalem stone house, haunted by tragic history and now home to the three misfits and their intricate relationship, reveals its secrets.xa0 At once an exquisite love story and a coming-of-age novel, Judas offers a surprising perspective on the state of Israel and the biblical tale from which it draws its title. This is Amos Ozx92s most powerful novel in decades. Praise for Amos Oz x93A writer of revelatory genius.x94 x97 Guardian x93The mind is a place Oz explores masterfully in all its contradiction, texture, and heartache.x94 x97 New York Daily News x93Once the eye falls upon Amos Ozx92s rich prose, the other senses quickly succumb, because, like everything Oz, all things are plural, even the telling of a single manx92s story.x94 x97 Seattle Times x93The glow [of Ozx92s writing] . . . comes from the spare and unsentimental warmth of his own voice, his feeling for atmosphere, and his gallery of colorful misfits and individualists caught in communal enterprises.x94 x97 New York Times Book Review x93[Oz] is a peerless, imaginative chronicler of his countryx92s inner and outer transformations.x94 x97 Independent AMOS OZ (1939–2018) was born in Jerusalem. He was the recipient of the Prix Femina, the Frankfurt Peace Prize, the Goethe Prize, the Primo Levi Prize, and the National Jewish Book Award, among other international honors. His work, including A Tale of Love and Darkness and In the Land of Israel , has been translated into forty-four languages. NICHOLAS DE LANGE is a professor at the University of Cambridge and a renowned translator. He has translated Amos Oz’s work since the 1960s. Read more
Features & Highlights
SHORT-LISTED FOR THE MAN BOOKER INTERNATIONAL PRIZE Winner of the International Literature Prize, the new novel by Amos Oz is his first full-length work since the best-selling
A Tale of Love and Darkness.
Jerusalem, 1959. Shmuel Ash, a biblical scholar, is adrift in his young life when he finds work as a caregiver for a brilliant but cantankerous old man named Gershom Wald. There is, however, a third, mysterious presence in his new home. Atalia Abarbanel, the daughter of a deceased Zionist leader, a beautiful woman in her forties, entrances young Shmuel even as she keeps him at a distance. Piece by piece, the old Jerusalem stone house, haunted by tragic history and now home to the three misfits and their intricate relationship, reveals its secrets. At once an exquisite love story and coming-of-age novel, an allegory for the state of Israel and for the biblical tale from which it draws its title,
Judas
is Amos Oz's most powerful novel in decades.
Customer Reviews
Rating Breakdown
★★★★★
30%
(383)
★★★★
25%
(319)
★★★
15%
(191)
★★
7%
(89)
★
23%
(294)
Most Helpful Reviews
★★★★★
5.0
AGXWFXZEKUAZLTHSLLY4...
✓ Verified Purchase
A Fine Book
I have found Amos Oz to be a brilliant writer who, with this his latest novel, continues to impress. Here several stories are intertwined. There are the present events. It's 1959 in Jerusalem and Shmuel Ash, a want to be scholar has dropped out of his university studies to take a job as an evening companion to a brilliant, invalided old man. Living with them will be the old man's daughter in law. Much of the novel concerns how these three work out their relationships, In their past there is the lady's father, the one Zionist who didn't want a Jewish state to occur (he was labeled a traitor) and the drama of Israel's birth and the lady's husband who was brutally killed in that struggle. And, oh yes, there is also Jesus, Judas and the crucifixion.
Amos Oz weaves it all together; although, while I found Amos Oz's take on the crucifixion and Judas interesting but only tangentially related to the main plot. A reviewer of this when published a few years ago in Hebrew, pointed out that Oz, himself, had and has been labeled a traitor and one point of this novel is that so-called traitors are not necessarily bad. But Amos Oz is too great a novelist to just write a simple minded defense of himself and his loyalty to Israel.
In short, the drama between characters past and present is fascinating. Interesting ideas are thrown back and forth but do not get in the way of the stories. A really worthwhile read.
15 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AFQ6B3PFTAFYRXPU6RY3...
✓ Verified Purchase
WHO IS A TRAITOR?
JUDAS (2014 Hebrew 2016 English) by Amos Oz, prominent Israeli writer, is a sobering novel of ideas. Judas is portrayed in Christian scripture and tradition as a traitor, archetype/caricature of "perfidious Jews" -- this phrase was in Catholic liturgy for centuries until 1959. Oz, a prominent critic of Israeli policy, may be considered by some hardliners to be a traitor. The characters in this novel discuss a leader of the Jewish community in 1948 who opposed creation of a Jewish state and argued for a state that guaranteed religious and political liberty and equality for all the inhabitants of Palestine. He was expelled from the leadership as a traitor and went into seclusion. A floundering university student participates in this discussion, a decade after the creation of the state of Israel. He visits state archives to research the debate among the leadership of 1948 but is denied access to documents.
His university study included an effort to develop the hypothesis that Judas was the most devout disciple of Jesus, who expected Jesus to usher in the redeemed Nation of Israel/Kingdom of God, and hanged himself in great despair when Jesus did not come down from the cross. It's a more plausible story than the one in the Gospels. The student lives briefly with an old man, also long in seclusion, and his daughter-in-law, whose husband was killed in the 1948 war. She too is reclusive, unlikely to re-marry. The house is dark and secluded, on the fenced border of the Arab section of Jerusalem. The atmosphere, winter, continuous rain, suggests a cloud over the beleaguered city. What are the prospects for the dream of a Jewish state?
The student's name is Shmuel Ash. Is this a tribute to Sholem Asch, Polish Jew, life-long writer in Yiddish, whose books were very popular and who was called a traitor by some Jews because of his sympathetic treatment of Jesus and the Apostle Paul in his novels? He was denounced by some Christians, too, because he humanized Jesus. Beware those who cry traitor at the critic of deification or sectarianism or nationalism.
7 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AFGCUR6QRR7PJ63R6EMY...
✓ Verified Purchase
Not for me. But for the right reader, this would be an excellent book!
*2 star rating given because the subject matter in this book simply does not interest me, not because I think it is a bad book. I believe a reader who is interested in the topics discussed at length in the book would have a completely different experience!
It is the end of 1959 and winter had come to the still-divided city of Jerusalem. For Shmuel Ash, the season was a time of change. Having recently abandoned his Master's thesis, titled 'Jewish Views of Jesus,' and losing both his girlfriend and the financial support of his father, he left university and became somewhat adrift. Now searching for a job, a handwritten notice seeking a companion with conversational skills for a 70-year-old invalid captured Shmuel's attention. Within days he moved into the small attic at the top of a spiral staircase and spent five hours each evening in conversation with Wald, and the remaining hours of the day were his.
As he settled in to his new role, Shmuel became intrigued by the two inhabitants of the old home, Wald and the beautiful but mysterious Atalia. What was the relationship between the two? Where did Atalia go when she left the house at all hours of the day and night? And why had she requested complete confidentiality for the job Shmuel had taken on? Answers to his questions were not exactly forthcoming.
The many free hours the job allowed meant Shmuel could do exactly as he wanted, to retreat from the world. He spent much of his time hidden away in the small attic room, with his books and lost in thoughts, and had a tendency to wander the cold and isolated streets at night. Despite Wald's warnings to not fall in love with Atalia, and similar warnings from Atalia herself, Shmuel became quite enamoured. His musings shifted from his ex-girlfriend, and bemoaning the fact that she left him for another man, to Atalia and searching for any meaning in her words or behaviour to show the feeling was mutual.
The narrative meanders slowly but steadily through the Jerusalum winter, driven by the evening conversations between Shmuel and Wald, the reading done by Shmuel to support his research thesis, and the awkward social encounters between Shmuel and Atalia.
Although I can understand why Judas was shortlisted for The Man Booker International Prize, I did not like it. Shmuel was incredibly unappealing, in physical appearance, mannerisms, gait and character, and this made it very difficult for me to enjoy the book. I found the description of his salient features unnecessarily repeated throughout the novel and this became irritating and distracting. I also found the 'relationship' between Shmuel and Atalia bizarre and unbelievable. Whilst we were privy to Shmuel's thoughts, Atalia's motivations remained a mystery to me and I found her actions toward Shmuel cruel and gratuitous.
The main reason I did not enjoy this book, however, is that I was simply not particularly interested in the subject matter. The narrative is very heavy with information, entire passages of text from Shmuel's reading at times, about the origins of Christianity, the perception of Jesus from both Jewish and Christian perspectives, and the role that Judas played and how he is perceived. The second major point of discussion throughout the book was the recent history of the State of Israel and it's politics. Whilst two separate and distinct threads of discussion, they did have common themes of loyalty and betrayal that rose to prominence. I am the first to admit, however, that I failed to engage with much of the book and read quite superficially, so there will be many more layers to this book that I simply did not appreciate.
This book was not for me, but that doesn't mean it is not a good book. There are many glowing reviews on Goodreads, and Judas was shortlisted for The Man Booker International Prize for 2017. For the right reader, I believe this would be a very good book. That reader is just not me. For that reason, I did not give Judas a star rating - I don't feel it is fair to give a book a poor rating simply because the topic does not interest me!
6 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AGKLLIV5BW3V2FTHIKYM...
✓ Verified Purchase
What If?
[[ASIN:B00ETOFONG The Samson Option (The Samson Option Series Book 1)]] Shmuel says to Atalia, about Jesus, "I love him." What a startling statement. He says later, "If only the Jews had accepted him, the whole of history would have been different. There would never have been a Christian Church. The whole of Europe might have adopted a milder, purer form of Judaism." As a reader, I am reeling from this suggestion. The thought takes my breath away. But wait. Paul the apostle writes in Romans 11:25-29 the when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, then all Israel will be saved. Paul suggest a remnant will be preserved and became the nation of Israel in 1948, which leads to the rest of this novel which is about the validity of the founding of the State of Israel in 1948. Amos Oz asks the reader to rethink history, including the role of Judas. I'm intrigued out of my mind with all the possibilities this novel presents.
Yes, a few readers have complained about the dullness of the routine in the little house on the edge of Jerusalem. I also thought I didn't need to read about Shmuel buttering and eating another thick slice of bread, or drinking another glass of tea. But these ordinary details counter balance the magnificent weight of the conversations between the three main characters.
5 people found this helpful
★★★★★
3.0
AEP7WXDS27GS4B45CCV6...
✓ Verified Purchase
Judas as Job
Judas, by Amos Oz...a good book...the main thesis is set out about halfway through the book....premature perhaps, but sine I'd already read Borges take on Judas, from which this author has taken...and the Gospel of Judas I was already familiar with the main idea, set forth above...to wit: Judas was the only educated man in the bunch, he was a banker and didn't need the money, the Romans knew who Jesus was and didn't need to have Judas kiss him....Judas did what he did because he and Jesus had agreed that Judas was the only one strong enough to do the job and it had to be done to prove the divinity of Jesus, but Judas didn't realize that Jesus actually HAD to die on the cross and thought he screwed up. So he deleted his existence.
What interested me was a notion that occurred to me but not to them: what if Judas is another Job? I mean, Jesus KNEW who would betray him so God, his father, must not only have known but had selected Judas....he hung himself because after Jesus died and he asked God: why me? God replied: it had to be someone...don't take it personally instead of counseling "be patient". So, Judas is Job. If you don't remember the oldest book in the Bible: Satan goes to God and wagers he can make Job, and honorable, pious man, deny God if Satan can inflict miseries....God says, so long as you don't hurt him, go for it....so, Job loses his cattle, land, family and friends but doesn't turn against God....so, Satan goes back for a second time and says: let me hurt him....God says: Go for it....and boils break out over Job's body and he is in agony and to make it worse his neighbors, he has no friends left, drop by and tell him he must have really pissed off God...and he says: but, but, but, but....he finally goes and prays to God, why me? and God says: it had to be someone, don't take it personally. Judas couldn't handle that answer...hanging was his way of giving God the finger....I can take myself out of this wager...Jesus didn't get dry- gulched
The book has two other aspects to consider: one is the fact that at the beginning of Israel as we know it today not everyone was in favor of a Jewish state and some of those people were Jews. Oz proselytizes at length about the arguments against such a state and this is becomes a weakness because of its repetitions.
The second, and what gives the book a sense of a tensions-of-opposites, is the relationship between the main character and the one woman in it that plays a love interest. He has been working on a Master's Thesis about the relationship between Jesus and the Jews, specifically the relationship between Jesus and Judas. He drops out of school and takes a job helping out an old man by listening to him bitch. She is the daughter of one of the leading opponents to a Jewish state and the daughter in law of the cantankerous old man. The husband/son was killed in the war of independence in 1948. Whether they will consummate a friendship and whether he will stay there or leave is that tension of opposites.
A primary reason for recommending the book is Oz's descriptive ability. Oh, yeah, the book is worth reading because the description of The Crucifixion (starting on 262) It is simply riveting and almost gruesome......
4 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AGPAI22OZWBZP2WAASOR...
✓ Verified Purchase
The language and the thoughts in the book were fantastic. Anyone interested in the founding of Christianity and ...
The language and the thoughts in the book were fantastic. Anyone interested in the founding of Christianity and Judaism will sit and ponder the intellectual arguments presented by Amos Oz. At the same time the question of how the State of Israel was founded are presented in a cogent manner that should intrigue anyone interested in the origins of the State.
3 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AFIQGG4R7IOPLWN7YDKC...
✓ Verified Purchase
Powerful, engaging, provocative
Amos Oz is a writer of the first order. This book paints clear and nuanced characters who are engaged in real life struggles. At the same time the characters are used by the author to present some of the fundamental and complex arguments surrounding the creation of the State of Israel and its relationship to its neighbors.
3 people found this helpful
★★★★★
4.0
AHJHV5R773UVUAGDTIIH...
✓ Verified Purchase
Slowly Interesting
Amos Oz's "Judas" in an interesting, but slow novel. Oz does an exceptional job of portraying time, place, and emotion--in this case: 1959, Jerusalem, and love and rejection (to include in an allegorical sense). This is a novel where heavy on biblical and Zionist themes filled with historical details and characters related to the creation of Israel and all the conflict surrounding it (both before and after).
On the surface, it's the story of a twenty-something biblical scholar, who's left school due to family financial problems and moved in with an opinionated old man in order to keep him company and provide a source for conversation. The old guy (Gershom Wald) is by far the most interesting character in the book, but unfortunately Oz spends more time on the somewhat mousy and whiny scholar (Schmuel Ash). Ash is more or less a glorified late night babysitter, but the conversations between him and Wald are highlights of this novel. Also resident in the home, is an attractive forty-something woman, who happens to be the widowed daughter-in-law of Wald and the daughter of a late Zionist leader.
The relationships and interactions between these three, and especially the young scholar and the widow drive the story and provide some tension and drama, albeit slowly, but it's the history that makes this novel an interesting read.
2 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AEDGUYLRGZ4HKBOAQBIS...
✓ Verified Purchase
A Great Picture of the Early Days of Israel's Inpendence
A great picture of the early days of Israel's independence. Very smartly done. Wonderful, informative writing.
1 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AGUHGEZAPR5NNJ4AFJEH...
✓ Verified Purchase
A VISIT TO OLD JERUSALEM
Like in so many books these days it tells the story of loneliness and alienation. I checked this book from the library. I have never read anything by this author though I have heard of the writer.
The book begins when Shmuel Ash has to leave his university studies and his work on his masters thesis, his father has lost his money, his girlfriend broke off their relationship and married her former boyfriend. Shmuel does have health problems, an enlarged heat and asthma. The young man is an intellectual working on his thesis "Jewish Views of Jesus." He is also interested in Judas and feels he is not the evil man people have, over the ages, feel him to be. He would like to study more about Judas. But now it is over, not to be. He must look for a job, support himself. He and his parents have never been close. Their marriage is unhappy. So why get married, involved with a woman. Just look for a job.
1959, 1960. It is a cold, dark, raining and sleeting winter in the old city. Shmuel finds an ad for a companion needed. He goes to a very old house, there is an elderly man, crippled, but well educated who likes to talk and is knowledgeable abut what he talks about. An attractive, beautiful middle aged woman interviews the former student and tells him what his tasks consist of . He is assigned an attic room, a tight little room much like a womb where he can hide, write and read. His only jobs are to make sure the elderly gentleman gets his prepared meals and the fish are fed. He is to talk to the old man, good intellectual discussions, arguments, both will enjoy. Because he was a student this is for him. More education. The elderly man and the young man are to communicate about ideas and life from five to ten or eleven on evenings. This rest of the time belongs to Shmuel. The pay is not good but the little attic room is cozy and again like a womb.
Who are these two? Shmuel is told he must keep quiet about the job and the house occupants. Shmuel is twenty-five, Atalia forty-five. The young man is attracted to her. Mr Wald tells him not to fall in love with her, he will be hurt. What are these two to each other? The now three occupants of this old house are interesting and likable. Old, young, middle aged.
There is much discussion about the Jewish and Christian religions. I have learned much reading this book. Shmuel has read much of the New Testament, he and Mr Wald talk about religion, life and whatever else interests them,the Arab and Jewish problems, How Israel came to be a country, the leaders of Israel, the wars. Very interesting conversations, fascinating in fact..