Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue
Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue book cover

Islam and the Future of Tolerance: A Dialogue

Kindle Edition

Price
$9.99
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Publication Date

Description

About the Author Sam Harris is the author of The End of Faith , Letter to a Christian Nation , The Moral Landscape , and Free Will , among other writings.Maajid Nawaz is the author of Radical and a cofounder and the chairman of Quilliam―a globally active think tank focusing on religious freedom, extremism, and citizenship. --This text refers to the paperback edition. Review “How refreshing to read an honest yet affectionate exchange between the Islamist-turned-liberal-Muslim Maajid Nawaz and the neuroscientist who advocates mindful atheism, Sam Harris… Their back-and-forth clarifies multiple confusions that plague the public conversation about Islam.” ― Irshad Manji , New York Times Book Review “Provocative and profane… Islam and the Future of Tolerance exemplifies the virtues of open dialogue… All Harris and Nawaz seek is to give voice to the spirit of rebellion and reformation smoldering in the lands of Islam. Forcing it into flame will doubtless be a long time coming, but these two men should be lauded for endeavoring to provide a spark.” ― Brian Stewart , National Review “It is sadly uncommon, in any era, to find dialogue based on facts and reason―but even more rarely are Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals able to maintain critical distance on broad questions about Islam. Which makes Islam and the Future of Tolerance something of a unicorn. Nawaz and Harris discuss Islamism and jihadism from a historical as well as a philosophical angle, with no trace of sentiment or dogma. Most conversations about religion are marked by the inability of either side to listen, but here, at last, is a proper debate.” ― New Statesman “The ideas it leaves behind―about religion, politics, values and interpretation―linger long after the book is finished. They seem a vital contribution to the current conversation, so often defined by the real or imagined divides that the authors encourage us to cross… Islam and the Future of Tolerance deepens our understanding of religion, ideology, politics and the possibility of common ground. It could hardly come at a better time.” ― Jeremy Rutledge , Post and Courier “[A] wise little volume.” ― Ray Olson , Booklist “Readers with a knee-jerk opinion of Islam will learn a lot.” ― Kirkus Reviews “A worthwhile read on the state of Islam and religious tolerance in the world today… Those interested in a deferential and detailed dialogue about human rights, Islam, jihadism, and pluralism will find this book both enlightening and engaging.” ― Publishers Weekly “In this conversation, Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz achieve what so many who take part in the debate on Islam and the West fail to accomplish: a civil but honest dialogue. The result is as illuminating as it is fascinating. Courteous and at times even chivalrous, the two men address every thorny issue on Islam, issues that lead so many others into wild shouting matches, personal attacks, and accusations of Islamophobia. In this gem of a book the authors lay it all out and set the rest of us a great example: that an incisive debate on Islam between a believer and a non-believer is attainable. Given the importance and the urgency of the topic, we must all read it and follow in their footsteps.” ― Ayaan Hirsi Ali, author of Infidel , Nomad , and Heretic “Free thought and rational inquiry once characterized the relative liberalism and humanism of ancient Muslim societies and civilizations: the leading Sunni Imam, Abu Hanifa, would debate atheists inside the great mosques of Iraq; the Abbasid caliphs hosted debates amongst the leaders of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam at their courts in Baghdad; the Mughal emperors engaged in debate with Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists. Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz should be commended for conducting a frank and wide-ranging conversation about a number of key issues around religion, reform, and Islam in the modern world. Nawaz’s approach is based upon detailed familiarity with extremist worldviews, and with the history and tradition of reform theology and renewal within Islam that desperately needs to be amplified. I hope that this debate will be a fruitful endeavor, and illustrate that, in our increasingly-polarized world, it is possible and even normal for people with different viewpoints to have a civilized conversation and to learn from each other.” ― Sheikh Dr. Usama Hasan, Islamic scholar “Back in Islam’s formative centuries, the engagement of Muslims with their ideological opponents helped them to forge the doctrines and traditions of their nascent faith―and perhaps now, as Maajid Nawaz locks horns with Sam Harris, we are at the start of another stage in Islam’s evolution. It is certainly a privilege to read their conversation, and to enjoy a flavor of those great debates between rival scholars that were once staged for the entertainment of the Caliph in Baghdad.” ― Tom Holland, historian and author of In the Shadow of the Sword: The Birth of Islam and the Rise of the Global Arab Empire “The reform of Islam is shaping up to be the most important issue in political ideology of the twenty-first century. This honest and intelligent dialogue is a superb exploration of the intellectual and moral issues involved.” ― Steven Pinker, author of The Better Angels of Our Nature --This text refers to the paperback edition.

Features & Highlights

  • “A civil but honest dialogue…As illuminating as it is fascinating.”—Ayaan Hirsi Ali
  • Is Islam a religion of peace or war? Is it amenable to reform? Why do so many Muslims seem to be drawn to extremism? And what do words like
  • jihadism
  • and
  • fundamentalism
  • really mean? In a world riven by misunderstanding and violence, Sam Harris—a famous atheist—and Maajid Nawaz—a former radical—demonstrate how two people with very different religious views can find common ground and invite you to join in an urgently needed conversation.“How refreshing to read an honest yet affectionate exchange between the Islamist-turned-liberal-Muslim Maajid Nawaz and the neuroscientist who advocates mindful atheism, Sam Harris…Their back-and-forth clarifies multiple confusions that plague the public conversation about Islam.”—Irshad Manji,
  • New York Times Book Review
  • “It is sadly uncommon, in any era, to find dialogue based on facts and reason—but even more rarely are Muslim and non-Muslim intellectuals able to maintain critical distance on broad questions about Islam. Which makes
  • Islam and the Future of Tolerance
  • something of a unicorn…Most conversations about religion are marked by the inability of either side to listen, but here, at last, is a proper debate.”—
  • New Statesman

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(1K)
★★★★
25%
(435)
★★★
15%
(261)
★★
7%
(122)
-7%
(-122)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Future of tolerance - tolerance for the intolerant?

Absolutely a necessary dialogue, no doubt, as exclusive and elitist it may be, that’s why I bought it.

Overall an amazing encounter, a 'rationalist' meeting a former 'islamist'. Open exchanges, with concessions on both sides, but in the end the dialogue leaves more questions unanswered (which is not why I gave it one star only).

Also, the title is a bit misleading as tolerance isn't really the subject, rather religious intolerance and a bit what might be done about it. The discussion circumvents that even successfully defeating religious intolerance would not be the same as them being tolerant. The dialogue does not really explore that by their exclusive nature the Semitic religions cannot be "tolerant" of the respective ‘infidels’. The most desirable option is not discussed: indifference, i.e., leave me alone with my beliefs or lack thereof, as I am indifferent to yours.

But for the past 35 years or even longer the world is forced into a debate over this religious intolerance. The debate assumes there was a solution to it from within the religions themselves. This book is no exception. Since the debate is to a considerable extent fuelled by barbaric nutcases on a killing spree, practicing religious intolerance to the unbearable, one of the important question is whether religion (through its imams, priests, and rabbis) can really offer a pathway towards more tolerance – or better, no violence. Obviously a book cannot cover all aspects of a debate and so even without this question discussed, the dialogue seemed relevant. Until one discussant explains that one of four preconditions for becoming a religious warrior is a perceived grievance, justified or not. A grievance!!!!! Considering that everybody has a grievance in their lives more than once I was flabbergasted. The other factors – having an identity crisis, an ideological dogma, and a recruiter - aren’t discussed. Except, of course even among the two rather rational and enlightened debaters the "West" is somehow or other the cause for a grievance. No surprise here. Then the debate goes at length into possible alternative readings of scriptures that would allow for their less belligerent interpretation. In the light of the aforementioned factors the debate became irrelevant to its title's promise. If those are the causes factors for becoming a religious terrorist any debate about alternative readings or interpretations of scripture is intellectual self-delusion.

I cannot see how in a secular world - even religious warriors strive on the amenities and fight with weapons of the modern and secular world - religion will ever provide a solution here, instead of offering only comfortable escapes (if not excuses or justification for barbaric acts).

As much as I admire Harris for his published work (I had not heard of the other discussant before) this consideration I find missing in the book, and that’s why I gave it only one star.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Laid out bare. A lost argument.

Sam Harris is one of the few people representing sanity today. I respect enormously his habit of staying cool and contained, not losing his temper or his footing no matter who he is up against. I have read his books, followed his podcasts and YouTube videos. I even checked PubMed to find his articles on neurosciences and sure as H he does qualify as a 'neuroscientist'. This means that he has proven that he masters the modern scientific method and has his doctorate to show it.

Maajid Nawaz is a British Muslim who in his youth became extremist (NOT a Jihadist, he likes to remind his readers). He was recruiting young members in Pakistan when he got caught, sued and jailed on his way back in Egypt. He heard the cries of the tortured, he saw people disappear. He studied the Quran, discussed with other inmates and formed his own idea about how the scriptures should be read. AS it happened, his organization turned its back at him. Then Amnesty International got interested in his case and managed to get him out of jail and back to Britain.
There he established Quilliam, an organization to fight against extremism. His main idea is to offer a non-radical version of Islam, to compete with the literal or "vacuous" reading of the scriptures as practiced by the IS, Al-Qaida and other extremists of the day.

This book is written in form of a discussion where both present their views in a very polite and considerate fashion.
To be quite blunt and honest, the task Maajid Nawaz has taken goes against all current Islamic authorities whether Sunni or Shiite.
His reading of Quran would mean totally ignoring long passages or using definitions and word meanings that the Islamic tradition does not know of.
What he suggests has a name in Islamism, it is called "apostasy". There is a death penalty reserved for those guilty of it.
It is remarkable that the American anti extremist organization SPLC has listed Maajid Nawaz as an anti-Islamist. This sends a scary message: The Sunni hardliners of CAIR and Islamic Brotherhood are in the position to define who is a "real" Muslim and who is not.

Maajid Nawaz is a very good speaker with a presence. His articles on various political issues are well worded, he is a straight thinker and a humanist to the core. In this particular book, even with the sympathetic support of Sam Harris, he fails to convince. There is no beef.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Astoundingly revealing. Sam could have spoken more about how non-Muslims can help affect positive change

A book truly unique in it's kind, the book is a transcript (I'm not sure precisely how literally) between Sam and Maajid. Some parts are difficult to read because they fact issues close to our hearts head on. The reason I only gave it three stars is that while I completely agree with Sam's position, it very much felt like he used much of his time to simply point to problems with Islam (to which Maajid gracefully and eloquently responded by the way) but seemed to offer little in the way of how non-Muslims can help affect change in a positive way. I would have like to see Sam use the opportunity to tell non-Muslims can put aside hate when appropriate and stay open and vigilent when it is not. And especially what can be done to help organizations like Majiid's as an outsider to the religion without being forced into simple bigotry, but also without approaching the issue with kid gloves on. Maajid, as I said, spoke with Sam with poise and equanimity and the points he admits about the shortcomings of his religion are heartwarmingly insightful. We need more people like him in the world. But while I laud Sam for engaging in this admittedly dicey area, I simply wish he addressed how ALL the world can help set Islam on a path of peace while not losing our humanity.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Wonderful Juxtaposition and Collaboration

A highly worthwhile little juxtaposed collaboration.
ISLAMISM & JIHADISM
"Islam is just a religion.
Islamism is the ideology that seeks to impose any version of Islam over society.
Islamism is, therefore, theocratic extremism.
Jihadism is the use of force to spread Islamism."
--Maajid Nawaz
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great read

This conversation was extremely informative. Maajid was very honest and well spoken on the topic, and even produced ideas that gave me some hope for the future. Definitely a person to watch.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

They discuss some of the very real challenges with modern "Islamism" and "Jihadism" that exists today and even intelligently tal

Really interesting short book of dialogue between Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz. Harris comes from a distinctly secular perspective while Nawaz is a Muslim seeking to reform Islam from the inside. They discuss some of the very real challenges with modern "Islamism" and "Jihadism" that exists today and even intelligently talk about best steps to address ISIS and Al Queda. The best part of the book however was the reasoned, respectful tone of the conversation. These two men disagree on many core tenants of life and yet were able to dialogue and learn from each other. Good stuff.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Future of Tolerance is Bleak

The love-in we witness between Sam and Maajid defines for us the differences between, say, Islamism and a Jihad and lets us know that it is good to debate those differences in a civilized manner. But after all the hugs and kisses, the book does little to suggest how differences between religions (including Atheism) can ever be ameliorated without tearing the fabric off core beliefs of one another's faith. Sadly, both God and Allah do little to promote either the liberalism or secularism needed to live in peace.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

No idea is above scrutiny and no people are beneath dignity

This book was very useful in helping me understand the terminology and many different Muslim viewpoints surrounding terrorism as well as ways forward toward tolerance. Nawaz delivers a classic quote: “No idea is above scrutiny and no people are beneath dignity.” The discussion on how liberals often undermine moderate Muslim voices by attacking anyone who criticizes Islam is especially important. Harris ends up taking on more of the role of interviewer than commentator in the book because Nawaz’s perspective challenges Harris’ views coming into the discussion. Grade: A-
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

Absolutely necessary to call a spade a spade and Islam is haram!
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I love Sam Harris

I love Sam Harris, but this isn't his best work. It's an unnecessarily long conversation about the future of Islam. Nothing really new or ground-breaking is said, and apart from Nawaz's delination of Islamism vs Jihadism, it just wasn't that interesting. Sorry Sam.
2 people found this helpful