Inherit the Wind: The Powerful Courtroom Drama in which Two Men Wage the Legal War of the Century
Inherit the Wind: The Powerful Courtroom Drama in which Two Men Wage the Legal War of the Century book cover

Inherit the Wind: The Powerful Courtroom Drama in which Two Men Wage the Legal War of the Century

Paperback – March 20, 2007

Price
$12.00
Format
Paperback
Pages
129
Publisher
Ballantine Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345501035
Dimensions
5.19 x 0.32 x 7.99 inches
Weight
4.2 ounces

Description

Jerome Lawrence was an American playwright and author. Robert Edwin Lee was an American playwright and lyricist. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. ACT ONE SCENE I In and around the Hillsboro Courthouse. The foreground is the actual courtroom, with jury box, judge’s bench and a scattering of trial-scarred chairs and counsel tables. The back wall of the courtroom is non-existent. On a raked level above it is the courthouse square, the Main Street and the converging streets of the town. This is not so much a literal view of Hillsboro as it is an impression of a sleepy, obscure country town about to be vigorously awakened. It is important to the concept of the play that the town is visible always, looming there, as much on trial as the individual defendant. The crowd is equally important throughout, so that the court becomes a cock-pit, an arena, with the active spectators on all sides of it. “It is an hour after dawn on a July day that promises to be a scorcher. HOWARD, a boy of thirteen, wanders onto the courthouse lawn. He is barefoot, wearing a pair of his pa’s cut-down overalls. He carries an improvised fishing pole and a tin can. He studies the ground carefully, searching for something. A young girl’s voice calls from off-stage. MELINDA (Calling sweetly) How-ard! (HOWARD, annoyed, turns and looks toward the voice. MELINDA, a healthy, pigtailed girl of twelve, skips on) Hello, Howard. xa0 (HOWARD is disinterested, continues to search the ground.) xa0 HOWARD ’Lo, Lindy. xa0 MELINDA (Making conversation) I think it’s gonna be hotter’n yesterday. That rain last night didn’t do much good. xa0 HOWARD (Professionally) It brought up the worms. (Suddenly he spots one in the lawn. Swiftly he grabs for it, and holds it up proudly) Lookit this fat one! xa0 MELINDA (Shivering) How can you touch ’em? It makes me all goose-bumpy! (HOWARD dangles it in front of her face. She backs away, shuddering.) xa0 HOWARD What’re yuh skeered of? You was a worm once! xa0 MELINDA (Shocked) I wasn’t neither! xa0 HOWARD You was so! When the whole world was covered with water, there was nuthin’ but worms and blobs of jelly. And you and your whole family was worms! xa0 MELINDA We was not! xa0 HOWARD Blobs of jelly, then. xa0 MELINDA Howard Blair, that’s sinful talk! I’m gonna tell my pa and he’ll make you wash your mouth out with soap! xa0 HOWARD Ahhh, your old man’s a monkey! (MELINDA gasps. She turns indignantly and runs off.) xa0 HOWARD shrugs in the manner of a man-of-the-world) ’Bye, Lindy. (He deposits the worm in his tin can, and continues looking for more. RACHEL enters. She is twenty-two, pretty, but not beautiful. She wears a cotton summer dress. She carries a small composition-paper suitcase. There is a tense, distraught air about her. She may have been crying. She looks about nervously, as if she doesn’t want to be seen. When she sees HOWARD, she hesitates; then she crosses quickly downstage into the courthouse area in the hope that the boy will not notice her. But he does see RACHEL, and watches her with puzzled curiosity. Then he spots another worm, tugs it out of the ground, and holds it up, wriggling. ) xa0 (HOWARD addresses the worm) What do you wanta be when you grow up? xa0 (RACHEL stands uncertainly in the courthouse area. This is strange ground to her. Unsure, she looks about.) xa0 RACHEL (Tentatively, calling) Mr. Meeker…? xa0 (After a pause, a door at stage right opens. MR. MEEKER, the bailiff, enters. There is no collar on his shirt; his hair is tousled, and there is shaving soap on his face, which he is wiping off with a towel as he enters.) xa0 MEEKER (A little irritably) xa0 Who is it? (Surprised) Why, hello, Rachel. ’Scuse the way I look. (He wipes the soap out of his ear. Then he notices her suitcase) Not goin’ away, are you? Excitement’s just startin’. xa0 RACHEL (Earnestly) Mr. Meeker, don’t let my father know I came here. xa0 MEEKER (Shrugs) The Reverend don’t tell me his business. Don’t know why I should tell him mine. xa0 RACHEL I want to see Bert Cates. Is he all right? xa0 MEEKER Don’t know why he shouldn’t be. I always figured the safest place in the world is a jail. xa0 RACHEL Can I go down and see him? xa0 MEEKER Ain’t a very proper place for a minister’s daughter. xa0 RACHEL I only want to see him for a minute. xa0 MEEKER Sit down, Rachel. I’ll bring him up. You can talk to him right here in the courtroom. (RACHEL sits in one of the stiff wooden chairs. MEEKER starts out, then pauses) Long as I’ve been bailiff here, we’ve never had nothin’ but drunks, vagrants, couple of chicken thieves. (A little dreamily) Our best catch was that fella from Minnesota that chopped up his wife; we had to extradite him. (Shakes his head) Seems kinda queer havin’ a schoolteacher in our jail. (Shrugs) Might improve the writin’ on the walls. xa0 (MEEKER goes out. Nervously, RACHEL looks around at the cold, official furnishings of the courtroom. MEEKER returns to the courtroom, followed by BERT CATES. CATES is a pale, thin young man of twenty-four. He is quiet, shy, well-mannered, not particularly good-looking. RACHEL and CATES face each other expressionlessly, without speaking. MEEKER pauses in the doorway.) xa0 MEEKER I’ll leave you two alone to talk. Don’t run off, Bert. (MEEKER goes out. RACHEL and CATES look at each other.) xa0 RACHEL Hello, Bert. xa0 CATES Rache, I told you not to come here. xa0 RACHEL I couldn’t help it. Nobody saw me. Mr. Meeker won’t tell. (Troubled) I keep thinking of you, locked up here— xa0 CATES (Trying to cheer her up) You know something funny? The food’s better than the boarding house. And you’d better not tell anybody how cool it is down there, or we’ll have a crime wave every summer. xa0 RACHEL I stopped by your place and picked up some of your things. A clean shirt, your best tie, some handkerchiefs. xa0 CATES Thanks. xa0 RACHEL (Rushing to him) Bert, why don’t you tell ’em it was all a joke? Tell ’em you didn’t mean to break a law, and you won’t do it again! xa0 CATES I suppose everybody’s all steamed up about Brady coming. xa0 RACHEL He’s coming in on a special train out of Chattanooga. Pa’s going to the station to meet him. Everybody is! xa0 CATES Strike up the band. xa0 RACHEL Bert, it’s still not too late. Why can’t you admit you’re wrong? If the biggest man in the country—next to the President, maybe—if Matthew Harrison Brady comes here to tell the whole world how wrong you are— xa0 CATES You still think I did wrong? xa0 RACHEL Why did you do it? xa0 CATES You know why I did it. I had the book in my hand, Hunter’s Civic Biology. I opened it up, and read my sophomore science class Chapter 17, Darwin’s Origin of Species. (RACHEL starts to protest) All it says is that man wasn’t just stuck here like a geranium in a flower pot; that living comes from a long miracle, it didn’t just happen in seven days. xa0 RACHEL There’s a law against it. xa0 CATES I know that. xa0 RACHEL Everybody says what you did is bad. xa0 CATES It isn’t as simple as that. Good or bad, black or white, night or day. Do you know, at the top of the world the twilight is six months long? xa0 RACHEL But we don’t live at the top of the world. We live in Hillsboro, and when the sun goes down, it’s dark. And why do you try to make it different? (RACHEL gets the shirt, tie, and handkerchiefs from the suitcase) Here. xa0 CATES Thanks, Rache. xa0 RACHEL Why can’t you be on the right side of things? xa0 CATES Your father’s side. (RACHEL starts to leave. CATES runs after her) Rache—love me! xa0 (They embrace. MEEKER enters with a long-handled broom.) xa0 MEEKER (Clears his throat) I gotta sweep. xa0 (RACHEL breaks away and hurries off.) xa0 CATES (Calling) Thanks for the shirt! xa0 (MEEKER, who has been sweeping impassively now stops and leans on the broom.) xa0 MEEKER Imagine. Matthew Harrison Brady, comin’ here. I voted for him for President. Twice. In nineteen hundred, and again in oh-eight. Wasn’t old enough to vote for him the first time he ran. But my pa did. (Turns proudly to CATES) I seen him once. At a Chautauqua meeting in Chattanooga. (Impressed, remembering) The tent-poles shook! (CATES moves nervously) Who’s gonna be your lawyer, son? xa0 CATES I don’t know yet. I wrote to that newspaper in Baltimore. They’re sending somebody. xa0 MEEKER (Resumes sweeping) He better be loud. xa0 CATES (Picking up the shirt) xa0 You want me to go back down? xa0 MEEKER No need. You can stay up here if you want. xa0 CATES (Going toward the jail) I’m supposed to be in jail; I’d better be in jail! xa0 (MEEKER shrugs and follows CATES off. )

Features & Highlights

  • A classic work of American theatre, based on the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, which pitted Clarence Darrow against William Jennings Bryan in defense of a schoolteacher accused of teaching the theory of evolution
  • The accused was a slight, frightened man who had  deliberately broken the law. His trial was a Roman circus. The chief gladiators were two great legal giants of the century. Like two bull elephants locked in mortal combat, they bellowed and roared imprecations and abuse. The spectators sat uneasily in the sweltering heat with murder in their hearts, barely able to restrain themselves. At stake was the freedom of every American. One of the most moving and meaningful plays of our generation.
  • Praise for
  • Inherit the Wind
  • "A tidal wave of a drama."
  • New York World-Telegram And Sun
  • “Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee were classic Broadway scribes who knew how to crank out serious plays for thinking Americans. . . .
  • Inherit the Wind
  • is a perpetually prescient courtroom battle over the legality of teaching evolution. . . . We’re still arguing this case–all the way to the White House.”
  • Chicago Tribune
  • “Powerful . . . a crackling good courtroom play . . . [that] provides two of the juiciest roles in American theater.”
  • Copley News Service
  • “[This] historical drama . . . deserves respect.”
  • The Columbus Dispatch

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(345)
★★★★
25%
(144)
★★★
15%
(86)
★★
7%
(40)
-7%
(-40)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

It is better to learn and decide for yourself how to think

As a Christian, I went into this book a little on guard. Not only because the overt basis of the book is the original evolution education debate, but also the format--it is written as a play. However, after just a few pages, this book became one of my life-long favorites. The battle, in my mind, is not so much between pro- and anti-evolutionary forces, as between those who favor free learning and thinking, and those who want to control access to information in order to control your opinion. It is better to learn and decide for yourself how to think, even it you end up choosing a new path.To me, that is the message of the book.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Classic - But Biased

This was a must read for a college literature class. Although it is referred to as classic literature, it is very biased against Christians and those who believe in Intelligent Design. It makes christians look like the bully bad guys.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

One of the Greatest Courtroom Dramas of the 20th Century

The so-called "Scopes Monkey Trial" occurred in 1925 Dayton, Tennessee and was essentially a hoax.

The state wanted a test-case to see if a recently enacted law against teaching Dawin's theory would hold up in court. The test was arranged by the American Civil Liberties Union; Scopes, who was actually a coach that taught the occasional science class, agreed to say he had broken the law for the sake of the test; the town cashed in on the media circus; and the legal wrangling was left to Clarence Darrow for the defense and William Jennings Bryan for the prosecution. Darrow did indeed call Bryan to the witness stand as an expert on the Bible, but their exchange was more friendly than acrimonious, and the next day the judge deemed Bryan's testimony irrelevant and threw it out. Scopes was convicted and the case was appealed to the state Supreme Court, which threw out the conviction on a technicality and expressed a desire that everyone would shut the hell up and go home. (One of the state Supreme Court Judges described the case as "bizarre.") The case was not retried and ten years later everybody but pop historians had forgotten all about it.

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, however, Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Unamerican Activities Committee began a series of witch-hunts for communists in the country, and as their reign of terror intensified the issue of what could and could not be taught in the public schools once more came to the fore. Playwrights Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee--who would also write another great play of the era, AUNTIE MAME--seized on the Scopes Monkey Trial and used it as a model for the battle over freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and what could and should be taught in the classroom. The result was the play INHERIT THE WIND, and in 1955 when the play debuted there wasn't a person who didn't instantly know it was a metaphor for Senator McCarthy and like-minded individuals. Today Senator McCarthy and his minions were a thing of the past--and the play is usually interpreted as a battle between narrow-minded Christians and more liberal, perhaps even agnostic or atheist scientists. Even so, it is easy to detect the issues of freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and freedom of expression simmering just beneath the skin of the play.

The play begins with the arrival of William Harrison Brady (based on William Jennings Bryan) in small-town Hillsboro to assist in the prosecution of school teacher Bert Cates, who has dared teach Darwin's theories in his science class. Brady is peturbed when a reporter named Hornbeck (based on H.L. Menken) announces that Drummond will be attorney for the defense--but he remains convinced he can win the case. Although the first act includes several scenes, including a notable fundamentalist Christian revival meeting, the bulk of the play is consumed by courtroom scenes. Indeed, the entire second act is essentially an extended courtroom scene, and it is justly famous, particularly the moments in which Drummond traps Brady into an implied admission that evolution and creationism are not actually incompatible notions. More than fifty years after they were written, these scenes still have the power to hold audiences spellbound, and while audiences now tend to see the play through a different cultural filture, it remains as disquieting, disturbing, and controversial as it was when first written.

INHERIT THE WIND is a powerful play, beautifully constructed, possessing titanic figures playing out titanic issues. It is truly one of the great dramas of the 20th Century and deserves to be read--and if possible, seen--by everyone interested in American theatre.

GFT, Amazon Reviewer
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Inherit the Wind

My niece was reading it for school and asked for some help.Read a few pages and got very interested and got the book.What a powerful story.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Drama Relevant and Readable Today

The Scopes trial of 1925 pitted John Scopes against the state of Tennessee. Scopes had been a public schoolteacher fired and jailed for teaching Darwin's theory of evolution to his class. What ensued was one of the most popularized trials in U.S. history, as the separation of church and state was weighed upon in a Tennessee courtroom. For the prosecution, celebrated politician William Jennings Bryan (Brady in the play) was called upon. Clarence Darrow (Drummond in the play), a well-established lawyer, represented the defense.

This play is a very readable account of the trial. Drummond's wit is evidenced throughout, while Brady is cast into an unfavorable light. While Drummond's quips may be amusing however, they deserve some thought, as this play is more than it originally seems, presenting a clear philosophical argument. On the whole, whether you are interested in the history of the Scopes trial or interested in any way in the subject of law or society in the respect as a whole, this book is an entertaining read. Indeed, it is written so that any can appreciate the logic of the argument, with bias, sure, but also with truths that can be spun to support any viewpoint.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Spark

I thoroughly enjoyed reading this in my freshman English class years ago, but it stands out as a major turning point for me. Because of this book, I was inspired to write. Nuf said.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Timeless Play As Meaningful Today As When It Was Written

Note: I made some Mormon reader angry over my reviews of books written by Mormons out to prove the Book of Mormon, and that person has been slamming my reviews. My review of "Inherit the Wind" is concise and to the point. Oh, I get it. That person is a fanatic, and he or she doesn't like that state of mind exposed.

This explosive drama is a re-enactment of one of the twentieth century's greatest courtroom dramas--the 1925 Scopes Trail. The collision of William Jennings Bryan (a religious fundamentalist) and Clarence Darrow (an agnostic) is wonderfully enacted. Scopes, a high-school teacher, was put on trail for teaching evolution.

The preacher's daughter is in love with Scopes, and the sparks fly over the conflict. The preacher's religious fanaticism threatens to destroy his own family. Thus, the line from Proverbs 11:29: "He that troubleth his own house Shall inherit the wind."

I would also highly recommend Eric Hoffer's classic little book, "The True Believer." A must for educated readers.

[[ASIN:0060505915 The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (Perennial Classics)]]
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Play not a book

My first negative review I wanted a paper back books what I received was a play written for actors was very disappointed .
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

Love it!
✓ Verified Purchase

Great read even for those who don't like reading plays! The movie stayed true to the play

I am not a fan of reading plays, but this was excellent