In the Company of Soldiers: A Chronicle of Combat
In the Company of Soldiers: A Chronicle of Combat book cover

In the Company of Soldiers: A Chronicle of Combat

Hardcover – March 15, 2004

Price
$14.33
Format
Hardcover
Pages
336
Publisher
Henry Holt and Co.
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0805075618
Dimensions
6.36 x 1.31 x 9.62 inches
Weight
1.4 pounds

Description

The advent of embedded reporters in the opening days of the 2003 US war on Iraq meant a more direct and personal point of view than battlefield coverage has historically offered. Rick Atkinson, winner of the Pulitzer Prize for An Army at Dawn , an account of combat in North Africa during World War II, traveled with the 101st Airborne Division of the US Army from its deployment out of Fort Campbell, Kentucky through its entry into Baghdad. The result, In the Company of Soldiers , is a thoroughly engrossing look at the strategies, personalities, and struggles of waging modern warfare. Much of Atkinson's focus falls on the division's leader, the hugely competitive and charismatic Major General David Petraeus, who seems to guide his troops through Iraq by sheer force of will. Atkinson devotes most of his time to the senior commanders, but the loss of the G.I. perspective, while disappointing, is outweighed by Atkinson's access to the minds of the brass who must navigate an Iraq whose citizens were not nearly as happy as military planners had hoped and who offered resistance in ways other than what the Americans had prepared for. While plenty has been written about the American military effort in Iraq, Atkinson's perspective, combined with a direct, economical writing style, allows him to present sides to the war not often seen or considered: long periods of waiting punctuated with mad scrambles to apply gas masks, fretting over how to pack all necessary supplies into tiny kits, dealing with dust storms that can ground state of the art attack helicopters, and reading the irreverent yet shrewdly observant graffiti left by American soldiers. In the Company of Soldiers lionizes the American military officers but it neither condemns nor offers unqualified praise to the US effort in Iraq. Indeed, the disturbing omens of chaos hinted at soon after the invasion began in the spring of 2003 would come into sharper relief when the book was published a year later. --John Moe From Publishers Weekly A Pulitzer-winning Washington Post correspondent and military historian gives the best account yet to come out of the Iraq War, chronicling the unit in which the author was embedded, the 101st Airborne, or Screaming Eagles, and particularly its headquarters. This inevitably puts much emphasis on the division commander, the intense, competitive and thoroughly professional Maj. Gen. David Petraeus. But no one is left out, from General Wallace, the gifted corps commander, to a Muslim convert and the victims of his ghastly but little publicized fragging incident at the opening of the war. The narrative covers this large cast from the division's being called up for the war at Fort Campbell, Ky., through to the author's departure from the unit after the fall of Baghdad. Through the eyes of the men he associated with, we see excess loads of personal gear being lugged into Iraq and insufficient supplies of essentials like ammunition and water (the reason for the infamous "pause"). We see sandstorms and the limitations of the Apache attack helicopter, and understand the legal framework for avoiding civilian casualties and "collateral damage," and much else that went right or wrongx97in a manner that is antitriumphalist, but not antimilitary. The son of an army officer and thoroughly up to date on the modern American army, the author pays an eloquent and incisive tribute to how the men and women of the 101st won their part of the war in Iraq, in a manner that bears comparison to his Pulitzer-winning WWII volume, An Army at Dawn. Superb writing and balance make this the account to beat.Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From School Library Journal Adult/High School–Atkinson takes the long view of history and blends it with a journalist's acuity for telling detail to create a narrative that is rich in immediacy, yet seasoned with thoughtful analysis. In the spring of 2003, the author accompanied combat units to Iraq. He spent two months embedded with the 101st Airborne Division's headquarters staff, sharing their daily experiences from initial deployment out of Fort Campbell, KY, to overseas staging areas in Kuwait, and ultimately bearing witness to the unit's march on Baghdad. His view of the war was from a vantage point that permitted scrutiny of strategy, planning, and decision making at the senior command level. Atkinson's portraits of military leadership are compelling, balanced, and nuanced; they reflect professionalism, a keen sense of responsibility for the 17,000 lives in the command, and constant reevaluation of optimal deployment of the unit's assets. The author draws upon his notes from the frequent battle update briefings he attended with the HQ staff, material from personal interviews conducted in the field, and supplementary data from "after action" reports to which he had access following his return to the States. This is a candid, well-paced work by a writer with an appreciation for the region's culture and geography, foreshadowing the challenges of U.S. presence "in a country with five thousand years' experience at resisting invaders." –Lynn Nutwell, Fairfax City Regional Library, VA Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Booklist When a war on Saddam Hussein's Iraq loomed last year, Atkinson took leave from his work-in-progress, a three-volume history of the U.S. Army's World War II campaigns in Europe (the first volume, An Army at Dawn , 2002, received a Pulitzer Prize). Reverting to his previous career as a Washington Post reporter, Atkinson filed stories about the army's historic 101st Airborne Division in Iraq. In this account of his experience from February to April 2003, Atkinson alludes to personal skepticism about the war but plays it professionally straight, telling what he and the soldiers saw--one soldier in particular. He is General David Petraeus, commander of the 101st. Atkinson was embedded with Petraeus' headquarters staff, and the reporter's viewpoint of the campaign is, therefore, that of Petraeus and his responsibilities for moving 17,000 men and women and their weapons from Kentucky to Kuwait and then into combat. Accompanying Petraeus to his briefings with his brigade colonels, and in his travels by helicopter and vehicle (coming under enemy fire on occasion), Atkinson chronicles the 101st's battles in Najaf, Hilla, and Karbala in vividly gritty detail that is factual and palpably admiring of Petraeus' leadership. As current history, Atkinson's excellent reportage will be intently read, both as a tableau of contemporary martial argot and ethos, and for officers' thoughts about their assignment in Iraq. Expect heavy demand arising from the subject, the author, and multimedia publicity. Gilbert Taylor Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved Rick Atkinson was a staff writer and senior editor at The Washington Post for twenty years. His most recent assignment was covering the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq. He is the bestselling author of An Army at Dawn (0-8050-7448-1), The Long Gray Line (0-8050-6291-2), and Crusade . His many awards include Pulitzer Prizes for journalism and history. He lives in Washington, D.C. From The Washington Post Rick Atkinson's new book about the 101st Airborne during the first phase of the Iraq war might better have been titled "In the Company of Officers," for the enlisted men and women who fought are rarely shown. More ink is spent on generals, Other Government Agency (OGA) and Special Forces operatives than on the cannon cockers, infantry grunts and truck drivers. For writer and reader, the SF, OGA and general-grade officers' combat exploits offer more romance and less in-your-face violence than the daily grind of the frontline fighter. Atkinson reported for The Washington Post as an "embedded" journalist during the Iraq war. He spent most of his days within earshot of Maj. Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of the 101st Airborne Division. Atkinson deployed with the division from Kentucky to Kuwait, and after battles at Karbala, Najaf and Hilla, when the 101st moved to Mosul for precarious occupation duty, he returned to the United States to write his book. Upon departure, he writes, "I believed it possible to write about them [the 101st] with the requisite objectivity, and to bear witness with cool detachment." But prior to allowing us to experience the division-level operational battlefront, wrought with laptops and laser pointers, Atkinson gives the reader a ringside seat at the complex pre-war costume ball known as logistics. The cannon cockers, infantry grunts and truck drivers would be without guns, rifles, vehicles and fuel if not for this surprisingly engaging dance. And the price of tripping your partner is high. Up to the moment that George W. Bush informed the world that bombs were dropping on Baghdad, Petraeus and his officers were trying to get fit for combat. Atkinson writes, "since no one knew when the war would start, it remained uncertain whether the 101st would muster sufficient combat power in time to participate in the invasion." Bush's rush to war had forced the Army to abandon its traditional deployment rubric and funnel units into the theater in "force packages" that were less than totally combat capable. Atkinson brings to life such mundane seeming computations as fuel consumption: "The Army calculated that it alone would burn 40 million gallons in three weeks of combat in Iraq, an amount equivalent to the gasoline consumed by all Allied armies combined during the four years of World War I." He also offers a complex operational narrative of the division's fights. Unfortunately, however, the men of this book don't come fully alive. Atkinson usually introduces each officer with an adjectival bath fit for a prince or a singles ad. Petraeus is "intense, good-humored and driven." And his aide, Capt. David G. Fivecoat, "was a smart, curious, sinewy towhead." Atkinson does the men and his book a better service when he creates a scene, such as when Brig. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley, under small arms fire at Hilla, was unafraid to offer his silhouette to the enemy: "Freakley strode past a truck ahead of us, yelling at soldiers to disperse. 'Sir, are you crazy?' someone called. 'You don't belong up here.' Fivecoat put a hand on his shoulder, urging him to lower his profile." Atkinson also excels when he eavesdrops on soldiers or describes the graffito on the walls of a latrine: "Who's your Baghdaddy?" And he makes precise but not excessive use of the ever-present coarse and violent language, the warrior's private, specialized profanity, that is unprintable here. Atkinson's early assertion that "embedding was a fair effort by the Pentagon to allow a greater transparency to military operations" is foolish but certain to get him invited back next time. And his editor should instruct him that the bio page is the best place to mention one's prior books. More than once, such asides ruin his narrative drive. But this is still a perceptive, exciting and engaging book. The battle scenes are heart-pounding narratives of officers directing combat. Largely, the war on offer here is the one available over command post radio frequencies and in after-action reports, but Atkinson does a fine job of re-creating the division's battles from various threads of information, including the Army's own history of the conflict, written by the Operation Iraqi Freedom Study Group. Atkinson is wise to offer an occasional view of the wider war. A few days into combat he lets us know that "the 3rd Infantry Division had traveled roughly three hundred miles . . . But twenty-nine Americans had been killed near Nasiriyah. . . seven others remained missing. Contrary to expectations, the mass capitulation of Iraqi units had not occurred. Bitter fighting persisted on a stretch of the Nasiriyah roadway known as Ambush Alley, and a half dozen Marines had been killed by friendly fire from an Air Force A-10." He also creates a war costs calendar, noting for example that two crashed helicopters "turned out to be total losses, at $20 million each." More important, he is keenly aware of the human wreckage that warfare leaves in its wake: Of the soldiers of the 101st, he writes, "They were better than the cause they served." Reviewed by Anthony Swofford Copyright 2004, The Washington Post Co. All Rights Reserved. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. From In the Company of Soldiers :We turned around. Najaf was pacified, at least for today. Back at the middle school where No Slack had its battalion command post, Hodges told Petraeus that he had declared Ali's shrine to be a demilitarized zone, "so there's no military presence west of Highway 9." He also had issued edicts outlawing revenge killings, but allowing the looting of Baath Party or Fedayeen properties. "You see guys walking down the street with desks, office chairs, lights, curtains," Hodges said, and I wondered whether authorized pilfering was a slippery slope toward anarchy. Before we walked back outside, Chris Hughes showed me a terrain model that had been discovered in a bathroom stall in a Baathist headquarters. Built on a sheet of plywood, roughly five feet by three feet, it depicted the Iraqi plan for Najaf's defense. Green toy soldiers, representing the Americans, stood below the escarpment on the southwestern approach to the city. Red toy soldiers, representing the Iraqis, occupied revetments along the perimeter avenues, with fallback positions designated in the city center. The model included little plastic cars, plastic palm trees, even plastic donkeys. Nowhere did I see JDAMs, Apaches, Kiowas, Hellfires, or signs of reality. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • From Pulitzer Prize winner and bestselling author Rick Atkinson comes an eyewitness account of the war against Iraq and a vivid portrait of a remarkable group of soldiersFor soldiers in the 101st Airborne Division, the road to Baghdad began with a midnight flight out of Fort Campbell, Kentucky, in late February 2003. For Rick Atkinson, who would spend nearly two months covering the division for The Washington Post, the war in Iraq provided a unique opportunity to observe today's U.S. Army in combat. Now, in this extraordinary account of his odyssey with the 101st, Atkinson presents an intimate and revealing portrait of the soldiers who fight the expeditionary wars that have become the hallmark of our age. At the center of Atkinson's drama stands the compelling figure of Major General David H. Petraeus, described by one comrade as "the most competitive man on the planet." Atkinson spent virtually all day every day at Petraeus's elbow in Iraq, where he had an unobstructed view of the stresses, anxieties, and large joys of commanding 17,000 soldiers in combat. Atkinson watches Petraeus wrestle with innumerable tactical conundrums and direct several intense firefights; he watches him teach, goad, and lead his troops and his subordinate commanders. And all around Petraeus, we see the men and women of a storied division grapple with the challenges of waging war in an unspeakably harsh environment. With the eye of a master storyteller, the premier military historian of his generation puts us right on the battlefield.
  • In the Company of Soldiers
  • is a compelling, utterly fresh view of the modern American soldier in action.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(136)
★★★★
25%
(113)
★★★
15%
(68)
★★
7%
(32)
23%
(103)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

An extraordinary account of the Iraqi war

If you are a military history buff, you will love this book. If not, it might be the right time to take a plunge into the subject. This account of military history is about Operation Iraqi Freedom. While justifications for the recent war between the American-British coalition forces and Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime are still being debated among politicos and the general public, the facts are that it did occur, American and British soldiers died and were wounded, a brutal dictator was toppled, and we watched the whole event play itself out on live television. Now the Iraqi people have been given the opportunity to rebuild a country in their own image and likeness.
Rick Atkinson, a former staff writer and senior editor at The Washington Post and a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author, has written a journal of his experiences in the Iraqi conflict, beginning on the morning of February 26, 2003 at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, home of the famous "Screaming Eagles," the 101st Airborne Division of the United States Army. After a couple of days of orientation, Atkinson and dozens of other journalists were flown to the Middle East. Thereafter, he lived with the 101st Airborne Division from their preparations in Kuwait to the occupation of Baghdad -- a period of almost two months -- and was granted complete access to the commanders and troops.
"In the Company of Soldiers" is Atkinson's very up-close and personal story of the war, in which he details every aspect of the conflict from planning and debriefings with the commanders, to his accounts of the battles the soldiers fought, to his sometimes intimate stories about the soldiers involved. It is an eyewitness account, occasionally laced with sadness and disappointment, occasionally with joy and pride. But more than that, it is also the story of one man, Major General David H. Petraeus, commander of the 101st Airborne Division, a modern warrior who was described once by a colleague as "the most competitive man on the planet."
The author spent much of his time in Iraq alongside Petraeus, who finished near the top of his 1974 class at West Point, and was known then as a "striver to the max." No ordinary soldier by any means, Petraeus had received a doctorate in international relations from Princeton University and for twenty-five years had been through various command and staff assignments, including tours in Haiti and Bosnia. Now he was commanding the "Screaming Eagles," a force of 17,000 troops, in a war in a forlorn and desolate desert environment, testing both his physical and mental skills. Atkinson, sitting in on the daily briefings as the division's attacks were planned, watches as Petraeus wrestles with numerous tactical enigmas and observes as the general instructs, motivates, and leads his soldiers and subordinate commanders in several intense engagements.
While describing this stressful and anxious journey into and during war, Atkinson introduces the reader to many other heroes of the combat, from Lt. General William Wallace, commander of V Corps, to Brig. Generals Ben Freakley and Edward Sinclair, assistant division commanders respectively for operations and support, Col. Mike Linnington of the 3rd Brigade, a number of CWOs who pilot the helicopters used in the battles, and, of course, that ordinary brave soldier on the ground whose job it is to do the job and often be irreverent when speaking about it. Our nation should be proud of them.
Even though I was on a deadline to complete another project, I read the entire book in two days because I had difficulty putting it aside. This is a firsthand account of war. It is a vivid picture of a remarkable group of soldiers and commanders. It reads more like a suspense novel than a nonfiction work narrating actual events. Atkinson's writing-style is what I call "facile and friendly," that is, easy on the eye and the mind, so much so that the story stays in the forefront rather than the sentence structure. And yet the details he provides are worthy of a scholarly work. In fact, the writing is so well done it's like a "motion picture in the mind," something I don't say about many books.
There are other things I really like about the book besides the writing style. One is the presentation of two maps at the front of the book (The Iraqi Battleground and Route of the 101st Airborne Division) which allows the reader to follow the movements of the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq; the maps are particularly helpful for those of us unfamiliar with the geography of that part of the world. I found myself constantly referring to them as the story unfolded, in fact so much so that I finally put a paper clip on the page so I could access them faster. Also valuable are the schematic which helps to identify the command structure of V Corps and the glossary of military jargon. Without the latter, I wouldn't have known an OGA from a DCU from an ASR. Still another plus is that the index of topics is very detailed.
I highly recommend this book to you whether you are interested in military history or not. You will not be disappointed. This is still ongoing history and a knowledge of how we got to this point in the situation seems to me to be important. Many of us watched this story unfold on television. Now we have the chance to read the book. True, this is the reverse of the usual situation -- read the book, then see the movie -- but television coverage, in retrospect, did not really provide us with the up-close and personal experience that Rick Atkinson provides us in this superbly written account of a most significant contemporary military conflict.
91 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

In the Company of . . . Generals

The title of the book fooled me, instead of the grunts on the ground and in the tanks, this book follows the commander of the 101st airborne, General Petraeus. Of course, generals are "soldiers" too, but the title is deceiving. The few comments from the common soldier are overheard in the chow hall or in the toilet line.
Atkinson is a great writer and was given unprecedented access to key leaders. He's in the command tent, flying around in the command helicopter, and sleeping in tents with other generals on the staff. The access did not taint Atkinson's coverage, as he doesn't pull any punches in his critique of the generals.
The book has 3 basic phases:
1. The build-up. The 101st airborne had to move from base to an airbase and across to Kuwait, and then had the agonizing wait for their equipment to arrive by sea. At times, despite Atkinson's great storytelling ability, this section drags, as he likely had lots of time to write but little of interest to write about. In every chapter, Atkinson weaves in his political perspective, which can get annoying.
2. The early drive/fly in. The 101st moves quickly to its bases deep inside Iraq, and everything goes well for a while. Unfortunately, at least for the story, the 101st is left out of most of the action, due to weather/wind and a setback by another helicopter unit that gets badly shot-up. However, the book picks up the pace, as Atkinson drops the political commentary and tells it like it was, with no hindsight. The generals are concerned that the war could last for months and question the usefulness of attack helicopters.
3. The attack towards Baghdad. The action picks up as the 101st is involved in clearing some towns, and there are interesting accounts of combined arms to clear streets without damaging historic monuments or injuring civilians. However, there is little explanation of how the general moved from "this could last for months" to being over in weeks. As in the first section, the political commentary appears again.
Overall, the book provides a fresh perspective from a few key generals without hindsight. However, the book is not up to Atkinson's lofty standard set by "An Army at Dawn". There are plenty of cliches, such as what the soldiers carried into battle. Even more annoying than the political commentary is the listing of the daily challenge/password, he must have mentioned at least 15. In the end, Atkinson's storytelling and access make the book worthwhile, but other books like "The March Up" provides a better feel for combat with the "soldiers" on the ground.
42 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A biased view from the Command Tent

Atkinson's book was a disapointment. The obligatory Bush bashing at the start, seeming to be an apology to other journalists for daring write something positive about the miltary. It's just so very forced and obvious. Additionally Atkinson seems to center on those officers in the command that open up with him on matters frankly they should, in keeping with military discipline not comment on. Why should an X.O. give a journalist, one who is against the very mission itself, their opinion on the commanding officer? That's just not done.
Beyond a Bob Woodward's style of rewarding those who cooperate with him, Atikinson heaps praise on those who agree with him. Of the commanding officer of the 101, he basically says, that he is smarter than most military types in that he is of a liberal bent.
Atkinson rarely seems to go beyond his own conditions to actually discuss the war itself. Everything he reports on has a self centered focus that is so very boring when compared to the events he is in the middle of.
Atkinson plays defense lawyer for the soldier accused of throwing genades into a tent of sleeping officers. The time he spends on the alledged reasons why the soldier did what he did stands in contrast to the almost whispered in passing comment on the capture of Saddam.
In all I found this to be a biased and even of greater offense, a very boring book.
35 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The author doesn't even try to hide his bias.

This author doesn't miss a chance to take a shot at Bush and Rumsfeld. He goes out of his way to do so.

He also seems to like to hear himself talk. There is a lot of unneccessary detail about mundane things. I was hoping for an account of an embed in combat. What I got was an embed who hung around with the division commander and constantly editorialized.

I started to read this right after I read "The March Up : Taking Baghdad with the 1st Marine Division" by Ray L. Smith and Bing West, a book I highly recommend. After reading that book I couldn't get past page 100 in this one. Every 5 pages or so the author throws in a dig, sometimes sarcastic, or otherwise makes known his opinions.

I recommend even more "Thunder Run: The Armored Strike to Capture Baghdad" by David Zucchino. If you liked "Black Hawk Down" you'll like "Thunder Run". It's written in the same style. Zuchinno is also a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, but he doesn't succumb to a need to lecture and editorialize the way Atkinson does.
30 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Another Crock-umentary

Please, Please, PLEASE don't let any more reporters publish books! In the Company of Soldiers, a recent entry by Rick Atkinson is another half-assed, book-length diary by a celebrity wannabe in the role of war correspondent. It has been flogged on NPR and in the liberal press, many examples of which are cited by Atkinson as sources. With Michael Moore's film crockumentary, Fahrenheit 911 forming part of the celluloid leg of this left-wing stool, and NPR the broadcast appendage, continuous doubt-casting has become a subtle tool of the political left, particularly noteworthy in the current pre-election climate. Full of intended irony, In the Company of Soldiers follows a general in the 101st Airborne through the brief and highly decried Iraq war, leaving off with ominous portents of a difficult occupation, in just enough time to miss it and leave the "We told you so" implicit in the fertile minds of media-steeped readers. Though Atkinson styles himself an historian, In the Company arrives too soon and is too full of self-reference to be taken seriously as history. It may some day be an historic artifact, but none of the neutrality that is a prerequisite of serious history can be found. Instead, the book is an oversized Sunday Magazine piece, long on unnecessary detail and accusation, and short on the dangerous endeavor of deep analysis.
Atkinson's writing, breezy in its own way, is overly fond of inapt simile: "[Iraqi] women in their billowing black [robes] resembled walking rain clouds," while seemingly naïve in its apprehension of the military style, repeatedly mistaking sarcasm in the graffiti he finds at the latrines as a `cry for help' of the kind so often sought by dew-eyed liberals. In one passage, the author translates FUBAR for the uninitiated, crediting Mogadishu veterans for its coinage, seemingly unaware of it as a commonplace at least in the 60's, one of whose witnesses he appears to have been. Similarly, he steps in to helpfully translate "NFS" written in the dust on vehicles from a battalion whose official motto was "No Slack." In contrast, he later uses a rather oblique expression, comparing the general visiting his men in a school building with a `ward heeler,' at best a political organizer's insider term for someone who knocks door to door, and at worst, a misspelling (there are enough of these, other malapropisms and editorial mistakes in this hastily published tome) of ward healer, who might be a doctor making rounds. He offers no explanation. In other cases, Atkinson pretends to be down with pop culture, and refers to an Iraqi amusement park locomotive made from a tractor as "tricked up [out]" in the sense that a set of dope 20" rims on a Humvee might turn it hip-hop, also nearly quotes Led Zeppelin lyrics correctly, but fails to notice the close cognation of the town of Iskandariyah and the famed 60's hot-rod cam manufacturer, Ed Iskendarian, who was to cams what Dewey Weber was to surfboards. Withal, the author does give the impression that he spent more `60's time on Peter, Paul and Mary and Pete Seeger than on Don Garlits and Sox and Martin.
True to reporting culture, Atkinson accepts the goodwill of his military hosts throughout his "embedment," then snaps like a leashed chihuahua at the Defense Department in his closing chapters, arising John Kerry-like in his war diary as a prescient mind, declaring weapons of mass-destruction " [proven] nonexistent," even though purporting to have scribed this work of evenhanded reporting in January, 2004, before any one else had `proven' the negative. Throughout, Atkinson dwells on the numerous errors that appear continuously in the military execution of this (and any) war, as if to suggest that Futility by Design is either a Bush Administration or at least an institutional mandate of the military. He seems constantly seeking a whiff of conflict between his general and the next higher (or lower) level, as if he is playing a role in a "reality TV" show, when the fact of his input might likely cause deadly results.
Atkinson's personal agenda is eventually fulfilled symbolically by his assigned general's offhanded gift of divisional and combat decorations as mementos of his journalistic adventure. The ghost of Ernie Pyle and others invoked in one scene by the self-absorbed Atkinson should stir uneasily upon his magic mirror fantasy. Those famed war correspondents sought the story of the war, rather than the story of themselves in it and their ideas about it, in a time when it was as much rumor as it was war. In today's diplomatically precarious-instant-gratification-media-infused war-making, the surfeit of witless commentary serves to obscure, rather than illuminate meaning. I shall place my copy of In the Company of Soldiers alongside the abominable The Greatest Generation by the pedantic Tom Brokaw, both cheap attempts at steering the reading public towards dubious social agendae through pseudo-professionalism. One should do better to read the works of Winston Churchill (The World Crisis and The Second World War) and get authentic cant from an actual player rather than drivel from an onlooker with a political agenda.
30 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

What a disappointment!! Don't bother.

It is a shame that such a reverred and accomplished outfit as the 101st had the misfortune of getting Atkinson as an embed. I bought the book expecting to read about their experience in battle. Instead, the story is mostly a behind-the-scenes accounting.

But worst of all, Atkinson uses the book to espouse his negative views of the Bush administration, inserting little pot-shots here and there. Perhaps he needed to do this to maintain his employment with the Post. It certainly improved his chances of an interview with NPR--which he got. But it's a smear on the legacy of the 101st to be associated with such vitriol.

In the future, Atkinson should partner with the likes of Howard Dean or Michael Moore, not the courageous patriots of the 101st.
28 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Makes good fire starter material on a cold night

I really liked "An Army at Dawn" and thought this would be similar but I was WRONG. Of course, buying it for $.01 used should have given me a clue but "An Army at Dawn" was so good. I really wish that the author had focused on the soliders, their lives, and their experiences since he was right there with them instead of spending 2-3 pages every chapter discussing how the Bush administration lied. Lies or no lies the soliders are in Iraq doing a job we sent them to do and theirs is a compelling story to be told but the author decided to give us his story where these soldiers are nothing more than game pieces in a grand political shell game both his and the administration's. It is amazing to me how the author spent this time with these young man in extremely stressful situations and all he saw was some grand political scheme. I wasted my time so you don't have to waste yours because even at $.01 used, it's not worth it.
27 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A taste of Disappointment

Everyone has a right to their political opinion, but Atkinson should have kept it to himself. His book serves the cause of those against the war FROM THE BEGINNING, and not that of the historians (or journalists) fair, objective, and, if their good, thoughtful search for the truth. By all accounts, a majority of Americans supported the war, you won't get that from this book. The only "unease" felt by most Americans, was not at going to war, but at realizing how politics can blind some people to what has to be done. There are so many comments made by Atkinson that I could flag as bent, if not comically unfair, but I don't have enough space. The only really good thing I can say, is that the book is written well. But there are a lot of people who write well.
I would not recommend this book. While Atkinson's "An Army at Dawn" is exceptional, this book is a tremendous let down and leaves a lingering bad taste after spending $25.00 on it.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Excellent at Points, Petty at Others

I agree with the reviewer who said this is more aptly titled, "In the Company of Generals," though I would add "and Colonels." Unlike Thunder Run or The March Up, few battles are narrated from the perspective of the soldier actually doing the fighting. This is not a criticism of the book, just a notice to the prospective reader. What Atkinson does well is write about the Commanders of the 101st Airborne, and their travels, travels, and accomplishments from preparing for war through the Gulf War itself.

The sheer logistical nightmare of preparing for a war thousands of miles from one's base is captured in the big picture and through anecdotes, such as the vigorous disagreement about whether to tape or paint helicopter blades to protect them from the sand. After heated discussion and much agonizing, it was discovered there was no tape. Paint would have to suffice. By spending time with the Commanding General of the 101, as well as his logistics and other officers, Atkinson does an excellent job of conveying the size of the logistical challenge faced by the 101st (and, no doubt, other U.S. divisions) and the magnitude of the accomplishment in meeting it.

As the war itself unfolds, Atkinson does a decent job of helping us understand how the 101st' mission changes to meet the realities of combat. The reader may be (as I was) distracted by continuous petty attacks on President Bush, Secretary Rumsfeld, and even Fox News. They are so ancillary to his point that they serve no purpose other to offend, or at the very least distract. Though Atkinson may try to place them in a bigger context, it's pretty transparent he is searching for his own voice among the facts at his disposal (like when he singles out a negative comment written in a bathroom stall about President Bush as somehow representative of troop morale and opinions on the war).

Overall, an excellent discussion about preparing for war, a good discussion of the 101st' role in that war as seen from its Commanders, but distracting and petty political potshots taken throughout.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Mildly disappointing.

On the spur of the moment, I recently purchased, In the Company of Soldiers, shortly before boarding a plane. I had heard a great deal of praise for Atkinson's, An Army at Dawn, and I was eager to read his treatment of the Iraq war as an embedded journalist with the 101st Airborne Division. Unfortunately, I found Atkinson's account to be mildly disappointing.

The book does have a nice flow to it, for the most part, and I was able to finish it over the course of a few days. Atkinson's writing is generally breezy and light although he definitely needs to give his thesaurus a break at times. I'd like to think that I have a fairly extensive vocabulary but far too often, I found myself wishing that I had a dictionary handy as I read through the narrative.

My biggest complaint with, In the Company of Soldiers, is perhaps its rather misleading title. I was expecting a detailed account of combat from the perspective of those grunts in the thick of things on the front line. Unfortunately, Atkinson's chronicle focuses primarily on the challenges faced by Major General David Petraeus, the commander of the 101st. An inordinate amount of time is spent discussing both logistical dilemmas and a myriad of difficulties inherent to the chain of command; subjects which I did not find particularly interesting. Upon completing the book, I felt as though I had a decent grasp of the overall strategies implemented by the 101st but lacked any kind of feel for the tactics employed to achieve those strategic objectives. In Atkinson's defense, the 101st did not really see a great deal of intense combat during the few months that Atkinson spent with the unit so there wasn't exactly a wealth of material for him to work with. Of course, that naturally leads one to question why Atkinson felt the need to write his account in the first place.

A lot has been made of Atkinson's numerous left-of-center political remarks interspersed throughout the book and I happen to feel as though much of the criticism directed at Atkinson is this regard is warranted. Atkinson is apparently no fan of either the Bush Administration or Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and while he's certainly entitled to his opinions, the deluge of snide comments directed at the Bush White House ultimately detracted from Atkinson's narrative. A little less time spent critiquing the reasons why the United States went to war and a little more time spent alongside the men and women actually fighting the war would have made for a far more interesting book.
15 people found this helpful