How to be both: A novel
How to be both: A novel book cover

How to be both: A novel

Paperback – October 13, 2015

Price
$17.00
Format
Paperback
Pages
336
Publisher
Anchor
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0307275257
Dimensions
5.26 x 0.75 x 7.89 inches
Weight
10.2 ounces

Description

WINNER OF THE BAILEYS WOMEN'S PRIZE FOR FICTION •xa0WINNER OF THE 2014 GOLDSMITHS PRIZE •xa0WINNER OF THE 2014 COSTA NOVEL AWARDxa0•xa0WINNER OF THE SALTIRE LITERARY BOOK OF THE YEAR AWARDA Best Book of the Year: NPR, Financial Times “Playfully brilliant. . . . Delightful. . . . Incredibly touching.” — The Washington Post “Magnificent. . . . Brilliant and cheeky.” —The Boston Globe “[A] sly and shimmering double helix of a novel.” —The New York Times Book Review “Joyful. . . . Moving. . . .xa0 Encompasses wonderful mothers, unconventional love and friendship, time, mortality, gender, the consolations of art and so much else.” —NPR “A mystery to be marveled at. . . . Smith is endlessly artful, creating a work that feels infinite in its scope and intimate at the same time.” — The Atlantic “Ali Smith is a genius. . . . [ How to be both ] cements Smith’s reputation as one of the finest and most innovative of our contemporary writers. By some divine alchemy, she is both funny and moving; she combines intellectual rigor with whimsy.” — The Los Angeles Review of Books “Captivating. . . . How to be bothxa0indeed works both ways, demonstrating not only the power of art itself but also the mastery of Smith’s prose.” — San Francisco Chronicle “A synthesis of questions long contemplated by an extraordinarily thoughtful author, who succeeds quite well in implanting those questions into well-drawn, memorable people.” — The New York Times “Innovative. . . . The book’s high-concept design is offset by the beauty, prowess, and range of Smith’s playfully confident, proudly unconventional prose.” — Elle “Deft and mischievous, a novel of ideas that folds back on itself like the most playful sort of arabesque.” — Los Angeles Times “Ali Smith’s signature themes—of the fluidity of identity and gender, appearance and perception—are here in profusion, as is her joyful command of language, from lofty rhetoric to earthy pun.” — Minneapolis Star Tribune “Ali Smith is a master storyteller, andxa0How to be bothxa0is a charming and erudite novel that can quite literally make us rethink the way we read.” — The Philadelphia Inquirer “An entirely delightful and moving story. . . . When you reach the end of this playful and wise novel, you want to turn to the beginning and read it again to piece together its mysteries and keep both halves simultaneously in mind.” — The Dallas Morning News “A wonderfully slippery, postmodern examination of the perception, gender, loss and the lasting power of art. . . . The sort of book you could happily read a second time and uncover overlooked truths. In art as finely crafted as this, there’s always more to see, if you look.” — The Miami Herald “Boundless. . . . Exhilarating. . . . Smith’s concerns—in subject matter and form—are profound and encompassing, and it is beautiful to watch her books defy pinning down.” — Portland Oregonian “An inventive and intriguing look into the world of art, love, choices, and the duality of the human existence. . . . Even though Smith is writing two very different stories from two different eras, she does a masterful job of weaving connecting threads between the two.” — Milwaukee Journal Sentinel “Wildly inventive. . . . The narrative voice makes the double-take cohesive, as both are lyrical and fresh. . . . I absolutely adored this book.” —Laura Creste, Bustle “Smith’s talent shines brightest in her tender depiction of the emotions that, like the underpaintings in a fresco, remain hidden but have a powerful impact.” — BookPage ALI SMITH is the author of many works of fiction, including, most recently, Summer , Spring , Winter , Autumn , Public Library and Other Stories , and How to Be Both , which won the Baileys Women's Prize for Fiction, the Goldsmiths Prize, and the Costa Novel of the Year Award. Her work has been shortlisted four times for the Booker Prize. Most recently, she won the George Orwell Prize for Fiction for Summer . Born in Inverness, Scotland, she lives in Cambridge, England. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Consider this moral conundrum for a moment, George’s mother says to George who’s sitting in the front passenger seat. xa0 Not says. Said.xa0 xa0 George’s mother is dead. xa0 What moral conundrum? George says. xa0 The passenger seat in the hire car is strange, being on the side the driver’s seat is on at home. This must be a bit like driving is, except without the actual, you know, driving. xa0 Okay. You’re an artist, her mother says. xa0 Am I? George says. Since when? And is that a moral conundrum?xa0 xa0 Ha ha, her mother says. Humour me. Imagine it. You’re an artist. xa0 This conversation is happening last May, when George’s mother is still alive, obviously. She’s been dead since September. Now it’s January, to be more precise it’s just past midnight on New Year’s Eve, which means it has just become the year after the year in which George’s mother died. xa0 George’s father is out. It is better than him being at home, standing maudlin in the kitchen or going round the house switching things off and on. Henry is asleep. She just went in and checked on him; he was dead to the world, though not as dead as the word dead literally means when it means, you know, dead. xa0 This will be the first year her mother hasn’t been alive since the year her mother was born. That is so obvious that it is stupid even to think it and yet so terrible that you can’t not think it. Both at once. xa0 Anyway George is spending the first minutes of the new year looking up the lyrics of an old song. Let’s Twist Again. Lyrics by Kal Mann. The words are pretty bad. Let’s twist again like we did last summer. Let’s twist again like we did last year. Then there’s a really bad rhyme, a rhyme that isn’t, properly speaking, even a rhyme. xa0 Do you remember when Things were really hummin’.xa0 xa0 Hummin’ doesn’t rhyme with summer, the line doesn’t end in a question mark, and is it meant to mean, literally, do you remember that time when things smelt really bad?xa0 xa0 Then Let’s twist again, twisting time is here. Or, as all the sites say, twistin’ time.xa0 xa0 At least they’ve used an apostrophe, the George from before her mother died says.xa0 xa0 I do not give a fuck about whether some site on the internet attends to grammatical correctness, the George from after says. xa0 That before and after thing is about mourning, is what people keep saying. They keep talking about how grief has stages. There’s some dispute about how many stages of grief there are. There are three, or five, or some people say seven.xa0 xa0 It’s quite like the songwriter actually couldn’t be bothered to think of words. Maybe he was in one of the three, five or seven stages of mourning too. Stage nine (or twenty three or a hundred and twenty three or ad infinitum, because nothing will ever not be like this again): in this stage you will no longer be bothered with whether songwords mean anything. In fact you will hate almost all songs. xa0 But George has to find a song to which you can do this specific dance. xa0 It being so apparently contradictory and meaningless is no doubt a bonus. It will be precisely why the song sold so many copies and was such a big deal at the time. People like things not to be too meaningful. xa0 Okay, I’m imagining, George in the passenger seat last May in Italy says at exactly the same time as George at home in England the following January stares at the meaninglessness of the words of an old song. Outside the car window Italy unfurls round and over them so hot and yellow it looks like it’s been sandblasted. In the back Henry snuffles lightly, his eyes closed, his mouth open. The band of the seatbelt is over his forehead because he is so small. xa0 You’re an artist, her mother says, and you’re working on a project with a lot of other artists. And everybody on the project is getting the same amount, salary-wise. But you believe that what you’re doing is worth more than everyone on the project, including you, is getting paid. So you write a letter to the man who’s commissioned the work and you ask him to give you more money than everyone else is getting. xa0 Am I worth more? George says. Am I better than the other artists? xa0 Does that matter? her mother says. Is that what matters? xa0 Is it me or is it the work that’s worth more? George says. xa0 Good. Keep going, her mother says. xa0 Is this real? George says. Is it hypothetical? xa0 Does that matter? her mother says. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • MAN BOOKER PRIZE FINALIST • A novel all about art's versatility, borrowing from painting’s fresco technique to make an original literary double-take."Cements Smith’s reputation as one of the finest and most innovative of our contemporary writers. By some divine alchemy, she is both funny and moving; she combines intellectual rigor with whimsy" —
  • The Los Angeles Review of Books
  • How to be both
  • is a fast-moving genre-bending conversation between forms, times, truths and fictions. There’s a Renaissance artist of the 1460s. There’s the child of a child of the 1960s. Two tales of love and injustice twist into a singular yarn where time gets timeless, structural gets playful, knowing gets mysterious, fictional gets real—and all life’s givens get given a second chance. Passionate, compassionate, vitally inventive and scrupulously playful, Ali Smith’s novels are like nothing else.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(411)
★★★★
20%
(274)
★★★
15%
(205)
★★
7%
(96)
28%
(383)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The Hand That Draws the Hand

Ali Smith has produced the literary equivalent of that Escher print of a hand drawing the hand that is drawing it. In art terms, her novel would be a diptych: two panels of equal size, with different subjects, but intended to be seen side by side. In her case, two stories from different centuries that comment on each other, reflect each other, and (in that Escher twist) at times even write each other. The first half is in the voice of a 15th-century Italian painter returned to earth watching a teenager looking at one of the artist's works in a gallery. The artist follows the youth through the city, and observes what seem like the symptoms of obsession. In between, we hear snatches of the painter's own story, growing up as the child of a stonemason, training as an artist, and achieving artistic but ill-paid success painting frescoes for a palace in Ferrara.

The second half is told in the third person, and is the modern story of the teenager in the gallery, whom we learn is called George. George's mother has recently died. But a month or two before she did, she took George to Ferrara to see the artist's painting. It transpires that little is known about the painter, other than approximations of birth and death, and one of the things that George's mother and George do is to make up a life to go with the name, a fiction that resonates with the autobiographical information we have learned in the first half, but does not entirely match it. The novel ends just as George begins the behavior the artist observed at the start of the novel. A hand drawing a hand….

No description of the novel can do as well as the short paragraph on the back cover, a reticent gem that nonetheless says almost everything that is important. Write at greater length and you come up against the fact that Smith keeps her ideas so close to her chest that it is almost impossible to describe the book without spoilers. For instance, I was able to identify the painter before the end of the first half (it helps to have once taught art history) -- but Smith holds back the name until the last few pages of the entire book, so I shall also. Looking back with my present knowledge, though, I see how skillful the author was in incorporating the known facts, together with a lot that might reasonably be surmised; she clearly knows her history. But a lot must be invented, and one of her inventions is a doozy that turns out to be the thematic pivot of the entire novel.

Oh dear, I realize that I must have made this sound like some dry intellectual puzzle, but not so. For Smith has given her painter an exuberant individual voice, with its own fractured syntax, idiosyncratic punctuation, and even typography (the whole book is printed with ragged right margins). It begins and ends in a poem about a snail, spiraling its way across the page, and the 150 pages in between are a poem in prose. Here is a complete paragraph as an example:

"It is a feeling thing, to be a painter of things : cause every thing, even an imagined or gone thing or creature or person has essence : paint a rose or a coin or a duck or a brick and you'll feel it as sure as if a coin had a mouth and told you what it was like to be a coin, as if a rose told you first-hand what petals are, their softness and wetness held in a pellicle of colour thinner and more feeling than an eyelid, as if a duck told you about the combined wet and underdry of its feathers, a brick about the rough kiss of its skin."

I did not need to get far before I was convinced I was reading a six-or-seven-star masterpiece. Unfortunately, the second half did not consistently sustain it. Perhaps it was the lack of the first-person perspective. Perhaps Smith left herself with so many themes to pull together that she could not quite find her focus. Perhaps it is that we are seeing George at a particularly awkward stage, lost, grieving, and not a little bratty. Even verging on autistic. But that feeling does pass, and there are some marvelous passages in this half too. Let me offer one more paragraph, about those Ferrara frescoes which contain, among many other details, a picture of a man wringing the neck of a duck. The voice here, repetitious but truly thinking, is that of the sixteen-year-old:

"It is like everything is in layers. Things happen right at the front of the pictures and at the same time they continue happening, both separately and connectedly, behind, and behind that, and again behind that, like you can see, in perspective, for miles. Then there are the separate details, like that man with the duck. The picture makes you look at both -- the close-up happenings and the bigger picture. Looking at the man with the duck is like seeing how everyday and how almost comic cruelty is. The cruelty happens in among everything else happening. It is an amazing way to show how ordinary cruelty really is."

Not accidentally, this passage contains the word "both," one of many "boths" that recur throughout the book, most of which I cannot comment on without spoilers. But this "both," the coexistence of happiness and cruelty, and of the details within the bigger picture, certainly hits some of the themes that make this ambitious but deceptively casual novel a near-masterpiece.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I read through it, and still give it 1-star.

I read through it, and still give it 1-star.
I was getting frustrated through the first part, read the 1-star reviews and realized most did not finish the book. I decided to finish the book before passing a judgment. The second part gets better, but not good enough to deserve better than 1-star.
Just to make sure, I read a dozen 5-star reviews, and I am not even sure they are talking about the same book. What humor? What clarity?
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I didn't care for this book at all. Impossible ...

I didn't care for this book at all. Impossible to get into. and didn't get past all the nonsense in the beginning.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I read ten pages and gave the book away

I read ten pages and gave the book away, and I very rarely do not finish a book. The style is idiosyncratic in a way I did not find charming or revelatory
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I would describe this as an experimental novel, and ...

I would describe this as an experimental novel, and in my opinion, the experiment was a success. There are many surprises along the way, and the characters are well developed.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A difficult read. I have not finished the book ...

A difficult read. I have not finished the book and don't know if I ever will!
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A wonderful first read, better still on the second, and magnificent on the third.

As Ali points out, people know that you have to listen to a piece of music several times to even begin to understand and enjoy it, but when it comes to books, they imagine that one reading is enough. For some books that is true - but for masterpieces such as ‘How to be both’, most assuredly not. Its richest treasures lie in the depths that skimming the surface will never reveal. Yes, ‘How to be both’ has enchanting and amusing wordplay, casts a shaft of light to penetrate our contemporary world - yes, it’s passionate, compassionate, inventive and playful, it’s about love and injustice, it is about everything you see in the writeups and the reviews. But it is also FAR more.

‘How to be both’ follows the stories of two intertwined characters, one - a talented and mischievous artist from the 15th century - the other, a prodigiously intelligent girl of the 21st. As we read, we discover the strands that link them: art, their mothers, gender ambiguity, love, mystery, understanding, what is apparent and what is not. All this is revealed in vibrant and enchanting cameos, links that spin the story of the two fascinating protagonists and launch their history on its spiraling trajectory.

The metaphors are rich - the two entwined stories, the two strands of DNA discovered in the city where our present-day protagonist lives, the twisted thread that Ariadne gives Theseus when he enters the labyrinth of the Minotaur, the seed of a tree spiraling in tight circles, arrowing into a puddle at the artist’s feet. Bricks, walls, arrows, rings, paint, and even cellphones enrich the story with unexpected meaning.

I’ve read it three times now, each time getting more than the time before, each time discovering hidden layers. How things that happened still exist even if we cannot still see them, how the ring that seed produced as it hit the puddle expands beyond its margins, beyond our ability to perceive it, beyond our lives, affecting everything in its path. How malevolent authority monitors us, or rather as Ali says ‘Minotaurs’ us, with its all seeing-cameras, Internet observation, and the twisted tales of its own. How we build walls of memories to protect and imprison ourselves, both. How we paint them in the colours we obtain by assiduously grinding down our experiences and what we find around us. And how with practice our originality emerges, enabling us to let the world be seen and understood, and how if we paint with bitterness, we turn that understanding to stone.

To wind up, I wonder how many of the judges of the Man Booker Prize, for which this novel was long-listed, bothered to read it more than once? How many of them more than puzzled over why the artist’s tale begins and ends with mysterious, undulating ripples of text? How many noticed that if one combines the arrow held in one hand of the artist’s self-portrait with the ring he/she holds in their other, we paint the very same spirals of which the book Is constructed? Or are they perhaps reading just once, missing most of the book, just shallowly stereotyping, Minotauring us with their pretense of expertise, ultimately being paid to sell some books rather than others? Hopefully both.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Spell-Binding Speculation on Ontological and Historical Questions

HOW TO BE BOTH is one of those novels that prompts pigeon-holing, especially by reviewers faced with the task of trying to make sense of it. The fact that it contains alternative beginnings (readers can choose to start in the middle if they wish, and work either backwards or forwards) might render it "postmodern." The idiosyncratic style, that veers from blank verse to lengthy sentences devoid of punctuation, as well as easy-to-follow narrative, might be considered "modernist," incorporating "stream of consciousness" elements.

Such categorizations might be perfectly valid, but they do not sum up the experience of a novel that reflects not only on the writing process but the way in which we make sense of the world. There are two discrete tales, one taking place in Renaissance Italy, the other in contemporary Cambridge, United Kingdom. In the first, Francesco del Cossa is born a woman but chooses to live as a man by binding her chest; after a turbulent apprenticeship, he creates the remarkable frescoes that now adorn the Palazzo Schifanoia in Ferrara, Italy. In the second, teenager George tries to come to terms with the death of her mother, while reflecting on the implications of a past visit to Ferrara, where the family actually saw the frescoes.

There are clear links between the two stories, prompting us to reflect on how societal constructions constrain us. Francesco del Cossa lived life as a man; likewise George, by shortening her name from her birth-name Georgia, has invested her life with male associations. At one point she feels that she is falling into a brief love-affair with fellow high school learner H., but resists the temptation due to a combination of guilt and a Hamlet-like concern for what her mother might have said. While there might be biological differences between a man and a woman, the behavioral characteristics associated with both sexes are culturally shaped.

When George visits the frescoes with her mother, both of them are fascinated; although manifestly in and of the past, they have a profound effect on their contemporary consciousnesses. This prompts ontological speculation on the meaning of "the past"- is it a foreign country, as many philosophers have claimed, or is it always alive for us? Are we part of a never-ending story in which everything we think, read about, or even learn has a significant bearing on our lives? Such questions are of particular concern to George, who continually re-imagines herself back in Italy with her mother, visiting restaurants, staying in converted palaces, or trying to make sense of her mother's statements.

Structurally speaking, HOW TO BE BOTH prompts similar reflection on what "a story" actually signifies. Smith's clever use of parallel narratives, coupled with her invitation for us to begin the novel where we want to, challenges our belief in the existence of a beginning, middle and an end. Such conventions, if they exist at all, are designed to limit rather than encourage creative thought. We are invited to think like George's mother, who during her lifetime was a member of the Subvert organization, whose primary purpose was to use guerrilla methods of protest to challenge existing power structures. In similar fashion we are placed in the position of reader/guerrillas empathizing with Smith's conscious decision to subvert conventional novelistic form.

Our relationship to the text is likewise redefined. We can become lost in the tale of the two protagonists, and turn the pages over one by one to learn what happens next. But Smith deliberately repeats both stories, only with the incidents rearranged in each one. The experience of reading becomes analogous to that of watching a film sequel that rehashes old tales (for example, James Bond). Through this strategy Smith not only reminds us of the arbitrariness of literary conventions - why should one event follow another in an apparently logical form - but encourages us to consider whether rearranging events in different form produces a sense of deja vu, or provokes new insight on our relationship to any fictional text. Are we actually passive readers, simply taking in (and subsequently trying to categorize) our experiences, or are we active participants in a conversation with the author, whose text prompts us to reconsider our relationship to the worlds we inhabit?

HOW TO BE BOTH does not provide any answers; indeed, the title implies that there is no "one" answer to any of the questions raised by the text. Instead we should be prepared to embrace contradiction in our lives and the ways in which we narrate them both to ourselves and to our interlocutors. There are arbitrary conventions in our societies, and while we might understand their arbitrariness, we cannot find a means to escape them. On the contrary, they might be the sole means by which we can impose reason on an apparently unreasonable existence.

Such speculations might be dismissed as "deep" or "pointless" by many readers, but they are the reasons why HOW TO BE BOTH remains a compelling text to read and re-read, even after we think we might have "finished" it. Truly a modern classic.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An excellent read

Set in both contemporary and historical time it is a wise exploration of what it takes for artists and individuals who do not match culture norms to live their talents and truths.
✓ Verified Purchase

Incredibly engaging two-party tale!

Ali Smith's writing is always filled with clever wordsmithing as well as interesting facts. This one has two stories, told in two different centuries, but woven together over time. Filled with surprises, the reader is challenged to gradually discern the connection. Funny and heartbreaking, this is Ali Smith at her best.