How the Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland's Heroic Role From the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe (The Hinges of History)
How the Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland's Heroic Role From the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe (The Hinges of History) book cover

How the Irish Saved Civilization: The Untold Story of Ireland's Heroic Role From the Fall of Rome to the Rise of Medieval Europe (The Hinges of History)

Paperback – Unabridged, February 1, 1996

Price
$15.99
Format
Paperback
Pages
246
Publisher
Anchor
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385418492
Dimensions
5.19 x 0.56 x 8 inches
Weight
7.6 ounces

Description

In this delightful and illuminating look into a crucial but little-known "hinge" of history, Thomas Cahill takes us to the "island of saints and scholars," the Ireland of St. Patrick and the Book of Kells. Here, far from the barbarian despoliation of the continent, monks and scribes laboriously, lovingly, even playfully preserved the West's written treasury. When stability returned in Europe, these Irish scholars were instrumental in spreading learning, becoming not only the conservators of civilization, but also the shapers of the medieval mind, putting their unique stamp on Western culture. From Publishers Weekly An account of the pivotal role played by Irish monks in transcribing and preserving Classical civilization during the Dark Ages. Copyright 1996 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Library Journal We usually associate the preservation of Greek and Roman learning with the Muslim world, but here Cahill brings to light the vital role also played by Irish monks and scribes during the time of St. Patrick and the Book of Kells. Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc. "Charming and poetic ... an entirely engaging, delectable voyage into the distant past, a small treasure." — The New York Times "A lovely and engrossing tale ... Graceful and instructive." —Richard Eder, Los Angeles Times "Cahill's lively prose breathes life into a 1,600-year-old history." — The Boston Globe From the Publisher The perfect St. Patrick's Day gift, and a book in the best tradition of popular history -- the untold story of Ireland's role in maintaining Western culture while the Dark Ages settled on Europe. Every year millions of Americans celebrate St. Patrick's Day, but they may not be aware of how great an influence St. Patrick was on the subsequent history of civilization. Not only did he bring Christianity to Ireland, he instilled a sense of literacy and learning that would create the conditions that allowed Ireland to become "the isle of saints and scholars" -- and thus preserve Western culture while Europe was being overrun by barbarians. In this entertaining and compelling narrative, Thomas Cahill tells the story of how Europe evolved front the classical age of Rome to the medieval era. Without Ireland, the transition could not have taken place. Not only did Irish monks and scribes maintain the very record of Western civilization -- copying manuscripts of Greek and Latin writers, both pagan and Christian, while libraries and learning on the continent were forever lost -- they brought their uniquely Irish world-view to the task. As Cahill delightfully illustrates, so much of the liveliness we associate with medieval culture has its roots in Ireland. When the seeds of culture were replanted on the European continent, it was from Ireland that they were germinated. In the tradition of Barbara Tuchmail's A Distant Mirror, How The Irish Saved Civilization reconstructs an era that few know about but which is central to understanding our past and our cultural heritage. But it conveys its knowledge with a winking wit that aptly captures the sensibility of the unsung Irish who relaunched civilization. "A lovely and engrossing tale . . . Graceful and instructive."--Richard Eder, Los Angeles Times "Cahill's lively prose breathes life into a 1,600-year-old history."-- The Boston Globe From the Inside Flap The perfect St. Patrick's Day gift, and a book in the best tradition of popular history -- the untold story of Ireland's role in maintaining Western culture while the Dark Ages settled on Europe.Every year millions of Americans celebrate St. Patrick's Day, but they may not be aware of how great an influence St. Patrick was on the subsequent history of civilization. Not only did he bring Christianity to Ireland, he instilled a sense of literacy and learning that would create the conditions that allowed Ireland to become "the isle of saints and scholars" -- and thus preserve Western culture while Europe was being overrun by barbarians. In this entertaining and compelling narrative, Thomas Cahill tells the story of how Europe evolved from the classical age of Rome to the medieval era. Without Ireland, the transition could not have taken place. Not only did Irish monks and scribes maintain the very record of Western civilization -- copying manuscripts of Greek and Latin writers, both pagan and Christian, while libraries and learning on the continent were forever lost -- they brought their uniquely Irish world-view to the task. As Cahill delightfully illustrates, so much of the liveliness we associate with medieval culture has its roots in Ireland. When the seeds of culture were replanted on the European continent, it was from Ireland that they were germinated. In the tradition of Barbara Tuchman's A Distant Mirror , How The Irish Saved Civilization reconstructs an era that few know about but which is central to understanding our past and our cultural heritage. But it conveys its knowledge with a winking wit that aptly captures the sensibility of the unsung Irish who relaunched civilization. "A lovely and engrossing tale . . . Graceful and instructive."--Richard Eder, Los Angeles Times "Cahill's lively prose breathes life into a 1,600-year-old history."-- The Boston Globe THOMAS CAHILL’s appealing approach to distant history won the attention of millions of readers in North America and beyond. Cahill is the author of six volumes in the Hinges of History series: How the Irish Saved Civilization,xa0The Gifts of the Jews,xa0Desire of the Everlasting Hills,xa0Sailing the Wine-Dark Sea, Mysteries of the Middle Ages, and Heretics and Heroes. They have been bestsellers not only in the United States but also in countries ranging from Italy to Brazil. He is also the author of A Saint on Death Row . He died in 2022. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. The word Irish is seldom coupled with the word civilization. When we think of peoples as civilized or civilizing, the Egyptians and the Greeks, the Italians and the French, the Chinese and the Jews may all come to mind. The Irish are wild, feckless, and charming, or morose, repressed, and corrupt, but not especially civilized. If we strain to think of "Irish civilization," no image appears, no Fertile Crescent or Indus Valley, no brooding bust of Beethoven. The simplest Greek auto mechanic will name his establishment "Parthenon," thus linking himself to an imagined ancestral culture. A semiliterate restaurateur of Sicilian origin will give pride of place to his plaster copy of Michelangelo's David, and so assert his presumed Renaissance ties. But an Irish businessman is far more likely to name his concern "The Breffni Bar" or "Kelly's Movers," announcing a merely local or personal connection, unburdened by the resonances of history or civilization.And yet . . . Ireland, a little island at the edge of Europe that has known neither Renaissance nor Enlightenment--in some ways, a Third World country with, as John Betjeman claimed, a Stone Age culture had one moment of unblemished glory. For, as the Roman Empire fell, as all through Europe matted, unwashed barbarians descended on the Roman cities, looting artifacts and burning books, the Irish, who were just learning to read and write, took up the great labor of copying all of western literature--everything they could lay their hands on. These scribes then served as conduits through which the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian cultures were transmitted to the tribes of Europe, newly settled amid the rubble and ruined vineyards of the civilization they had overwhelmed. Without this Service of the Scribes, everything that happened subsequently would have been unthinkable. Without the Mission of the Irish Monks, who single-handedly refounded European civilization throughout the continent in the bays and valleys of their exile, the world that came after them would have been an entirely different one--a world without books. And our own world would never have come to be.Not for a thousand years--not since the Spartan Legion had perished at the Hot Gates of Thermopylae had western civilization been put to such a test or faced such odds, nor would it again face extinction till in this century it devised the means of extinguishing all life. As our story opens at the beginning of the fifth century, no one could foresee the coming collapse. But to reasonable men in the second half of the century, surveying the situation of their time, the end was no longer in doubt: their world was finished. One could do nothing but, like Ausonius, retire to one's villa, write poetry, and await the inevitable. It never occurred to them that the building blocks of their world would be saved by outlandish oddities from a land so marginal that the Romans had not bothered to conquer it, by men so strange they lived in little huts on rocky outcrops and shaved half their heads and tortured themselves with fasts and chills and nettle baths. As Kenneth Clark said, "Looking back from the great civilizations of twelfth-century France or seventeenth-century Rome, it is hard to believe that for quite a long time--almost a hundred years--western Christianity survived by clinging to places like Skellig Michael, a pinnacle of rock eighteen miles from the Irish coast, rising seven hundred feet out of the sea."Clark, who began his Civilisation with a chapter (called "The Skin of Our Teeth") on the precarious transition from classical to medieval, is an exception in that he gives full weight to the Irish contribution. Many historians fail to mention it entirely, and few advert to the breathtaking drama of this cultural cliffhanger. This is probably because it is easier to describe stasis (classical, then medieval) than movement (classical to medieval). It is also true that historians are generally expert in one period or the other, so that analysis of the transition falls outside their--and everyone's?--competence. At all events, I know of no single book now in print that is devoted to the subject of the transition, nor even one in which this subject plays a substantial part.In looking to remedy this omission, we may as well ask ourselves the big question: How real is history? Is it just an enormous soup, so full of disparate ingredients that it is uncharacterizable? Is it true, as Emil Cioran has remarked, that history proves nothing because it contains everything? Is not the reverse side of this that history can be made to say whatever we wish it to?I think, rather, that every age writes history anew, reviewing deeds and texts of other ages from its own vantage point. Our history, the history we read in school and refer to in later life, was largely written by Protestant Englishmen and Anglo-Saxon Protestant Americans. Just as certain contemporary historians have been discovering that such redactors are not always reliable when it comes to the contributions of, say, women or African Americans, we should not be surprised to find that such storytellers have overlooked a tremendous contribution in the distant past that was both Celtic and Catholic, a contribution without which European civilization would have been impossible.To an educated Englishman of the last century, for instance, the Irish were by their very nature incapable of civilization. "The Irish," proclaimed Benjamin Disraeli, Queen Victoria's beloved prime minister, "hate our order, our civilization, our enterprising industry, our pure religion [Disraeli's father had abandoned Judaism for the Church of England]. This wild, reckless, indolent, uncertain and superstitious race have no sympathy with the English character. Their ideal of human felicity is an alternation of clannish broils and coarse idolatry [i.e., Catholicism]. Their history describes an unbroken circle of bigotry [!] and blood." The venomous racism and knuckle-headed prejudice of this characterization may be evident to us, but in the days of "dear old Dizzy," as the queen called the man who had presented her with India, it simply passed for indisputable truth.Occasionally, of course, even the smug colonists of the little queen's empire would experience a momentary qualm: Could the conquerors possibly be responsible for the state of the colonized? But they quickly suppressed any doubt and wrapped themselves in their impervious superiority, as in this response by the historian Charles Kingsley to the famine-induced destitution he witnessed in Victorian Ireland: "I am daunted by the human chimpanzees I saw along that hundred miles of horrible country. I don't believe they are our fault [emphasis mine]. I believe that there are not only many more of them than of old, but that they are happier, better and more comfortably fed and lodged under our rule than they ever were. But to see white chimpanzees is dreadful; if they were black, one would not feel it so much, but their skins, except where tanned by exposure, are as white as ours."Nor can we comfort ourselves that such thinking passed long ago from the scene. As the distinguished Princeton historian Anthony Grafton wrote recently in The New York Review of Books of history departments at the better American universities: "Catholic culture--like most Catholics--was usually disdained, as the province of lesser breeds fit only for the legendary parochial schools where nuns told their charges never to order ravioli on a date, lest their boy friends be reminded of pillows. Stereotypes and prejudices of this kind, as nasty as anything fastened upon Jews, persisted in American universities until an uncomfortably recent date."That date may be only the day before yesterday. Yet this is not to accuse any historian of deliberate falsification. No, the problem is more subtle than deception--and artfully described by John Henry Newman in his fable of the Man and the Lion:The Man once invited the Lion to be his guest, and received him with princely hospitality. The Lion had the run of a magnificent palace, in which there were a vast many things to admire. There were large saloons and long corridors, richly furnished and decorated, and filled with a profusion of fine specimens of sculpture and painting, the works of the first masters in either art. The subjects represented were various; but the most prominent of them had an especial interest for the noble animal who stalked by them. It was that of the Lion himself; and as the owner of the mansion led him from one apartment into another, he did not fail to direct his attention to the indirect homage which these various groups and tableaux paid to the importance of the lion tribe.There was, however, one remarkable feature in all of them, to which the host, silent as he was from politeness, seemed not at all insensible; that diverse as were these representations, in one point they all agreed, that the man was always victorious, and the lion was always overcome.It is not that the Lion has been excluded from the history of art, but rather that he has been presented badly--and he never wins. When the Lion had finished his tour of the mansion, continues Newman, "his entertainer asked him what he thought of the splendours it contained; and he in reply did full justice to the riches of its owner and the skill of its decorators, but he added, 'Lions would have fared better, had lions been the artists.'"In the course of this history, we shall meet many entertainers, persons of substance who have their story to tell, some of whom may believe that their story is all there is to tell. We shall be gracious and give them a hearing without disparagement. We shall even attempt to see things from their point of view. But every once in a while we shall find ourselves entertaining lions. At which moments, it will be every reader for himself.We begin, however, not in the land of lions, but in the orderly, predictable world of Rome. For in order to appreciate the significance of the Irish contribution, we need first to take an inventory of the civilized empire of late antiquity. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • NATIONAL BESTSELLER • A book in the best tradition of popular history—the untold story of Ireland's role in maintaining Western culture while the Dark Ages settled on Europe.
  • • The perfect St. Patrick's Day gift!
  • Every year millions of Americans celebrate St. Patrick's Day, but they may not be aware of how great an influence St. Patrick was on the subsequent history of civilization. Not only did he bring Christianity to Ireland, he instilled a sense of literacy and learning that would create the conditions that allowed Ireland to become "the isle of saints and scholars"—and thus preserve Western culture while Europe was being overrun by barbarians. In this entertaining and compelling narrative, Thomas Cahill tells the story of how Europe evolved from the classical age of Rome to the medieval era. Without Ireland, the transition could not have taken place. Not only did Irish monks and scribes maintain the very record of Western civilization -- copying manuscripts of Greek and Latin writers, both pagan and Christian, while libraries and learning on the continent were forever lost—they brought their uniquely Irish world-view to the task. As Cahill delightfully illustrates, so much of the liveliness we associate with medieval culture has its roots in Ireland. When the seeds of culture were replanted on the European continent, it was from Ireland that they were germinated. In the tradition of Barbara Tuchman's
  • A Distant Mirror, How The Irish Saved Civilization
  • reconstructs an era that few know about but which is central to understanding our past and our cultural heritage. But it conveys its knowledge with a winking wit that aptly captures the sensibility of the unsung Irish who relaunched civilization.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(1.3K)
★★★★
25%
(525)
★★★
15%
(315)
★★
7%
(147)
-7%
(-147)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Pure malarkey

Don't get me wrong- this is a very entertaining book. If you've ever hung out in a bar and met one of those droll sons of the Esmerald Isle spinning a hilarious tale or two after a wee bit of the ol' poteen just imagine a whole book of such tales purporting to show how the Irish saved Europe's bacon. No pesky historical FACTS get in the way of a single-minded Irish Catholic view of the past. Reading this reminded me of the Cold war Soviets who claimed the Russians invented everything or the Greek dad in the recent popular movie who thought every word had Greek roots and the Greeeks were best at everything. And the Greeks is where this book's theory comes CRASHING down because of...BYZANTIUM!...in this work described as "a small defensible state"!!! The fact is the the Byzantine Empire continued the Roman Empire for centuries after the "fall" of the western Roman empire and all of the supposedly lost civilization of Rome was there all along in a huge area of eastern and southern Europe. This is mentioned on ONE! page in the book. In fact the so-called Dark Ages were really never as dark or uncivilised as they popularly thought to be. The West is Better prejudices of our time come through clearly- its as if Eastern and Central Europe didn't exist. I think the Germans would be surprised to find out that it isn't Romanesque architecture and art from German towns that count but Irish inspired manuscripts. A topsy-turvy view of the world and history is displayed here- the classic Romans and Greeks are "pessimistic and dark" whereas the newly christianised Irish are humanistic and freedom-loving! We have here a great example of a new kind of popular history where entertainment and prejudice mix to prove whatever you want. If you're Irish and Catholic you'll love this book- everybody else bring your grain of salt!
153 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not serious history

What Thomas Cahill has delivered in this small, interesting volume cannot be considered serious history. It's more in the vein of what you might catch on the History Channel: Take a few historical figures, add a dash of overstimulated credulity, and rush it to press.

So, where to begin? There are historical mistakes, presumptions, and misrepresentations on almost every page, so we'll take small representative nuggets.

On page 35, Cahill writes of "the death of the last western emperor in 476." Umm, no. The last emperor was Romulus Augustulus. He was a teenager when we was deposed by Odovacar in 476, and lived on afterward to possibly as late as 507 A.D.

On page 195, amidst a push for female ordination, we find this strange offering: "At Amay in Belgium there was even discovered in 1977 a sarcophagus, ornamented in the Celtic manner and showing the image of a woman (mysteriously labeled 'Saint Chrodoara') who carries a bishop's crozier." Cahill seems unaware that when the leader of an abbey was installed by a bishop, that leader received a copy of the rule, a ring, a pectoral cross, and a CROZIER. The leader of the abbey might be a male abbot, or in the case of a female abbey, an abbess. Many abbesses even today still can be seen with a crozier.

These two mistakes near the beginning and end of the book sandwich dozens of similar ones. Anyone can look up these simple facts, and it's rather amazing that Cahill did not. Instead, he likes to tease with his own historical inventions, a la Dan Brown.

Cahill seems bent on reading 20th century sentiments into 5th century history, continually poking at the early Roman church in a thinly veiled attack on today's church leadership. (See his obligatory abortion plug on page 178.) And while he claims that the legacy of Augustine of Hippo has the Roman hierarchy obsessed with sexual morality where Patrick and his followers are not, it seems that it's Cahill who's obsessed. It crops up continually in this book. Consider this passage from page 149: "As late as the last [19th] century naked men (and, for all we know, women) raced horses bareback along Clare's beaches through the surf at high tide, looking for all the world like their prehistoric warrior ancestors." For all we know? That's to be taken as serious history? At least Cahill gives his source for this conjecture, in the notes on page 229: "The reference to naked riders ... originates in a wonderful talk I heard in 1970." A talk? Originates in 1970? This was the 19th century; no reports? no photos? no records?

Cahill insists that we have the Irish to thank for private confession, claiming that the Roman church had only public penance until then. But he seems to conflate or confuse confession with penance. Plenty of Church Fathers, long before Patrick, understood the need for—and advocated—private confession, even if the subsequent penance was public.

Cahill presents the Irish Church not so much as saving civilization, but downright opposed to it. Everything hinges (to borrow his word) on Irish Catholicism vs. Roman Catholicism. It comes to an historical head at the Synod of Whitby in 664, which you'd think might be the climax of the book. Instead, it appears at the end in anticlimax. Cahill is disappointed that the synod agenda is topped by the seemingly trivial matters of calendars and haircuts. Maybe, Mr. Cahill, that's because in important matters, like confession, eucharist, ordination, authority, monastic structures, ascetic practices, and even sexual ethics, there was no conflict or disagreement between them, much as you try to portray differently. "What is far more impressive about the period as a whole—and perhaps even about what actually happened at Whitby—is the close fraternal cooperation between the Irish and the English. ... If Christians of different tribes had in all ages cooperated with one another as did these men and women, the world would be a very different place." (p. 202) It would have been nice if Cahill himself adopted this attitude when writing the book. Instead, his personal axes are ground on every page.

I give this book 2 stars, because it's a fast, fun, provocative read. If you are not familiar with the main characters, it provides an introduction to them and their milieu. But other than that, this book does not serve history well.
95 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

How Many Of Us Knew?

How many of us even had a clue about the pivotal role the Irish played in preserving our history? This book is a delight to read, as Cahill has a way of pulling you in and keeping your interest. I have long been in love with all things Irish, but until this book I had no idea the important part they played in the history of the world. Had it not been for the Irish monks, toiling away in solitude in desolate places, most of the ancient books we have today would have been lost for all time. Cahill's "Hinges of History" series is wonderful reading [I have also read "The Gifts of the Jews" and "Desire of the Everlasting Hills"],even for those who find history to often be dry and dull. He has a way of making the past come to life in a very real way, and even more important, makes it fun. I love his sense of humor. Anyone who wants to see history in a fresh and new way should check him out, and be sure to read this book.
68 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

From Classical Antiquity to Celtic Christianity Dominates through Literary & Biblical Scholarship

Pleasantly surprised that the book was not specifically about Irish History. The first few chapters focus on classical antiquity in relation to Ireland and Celtic Christianity, which is why I described the chapters in detail because the title felt somewhat misleading although in the end Cahill does brilliantly prove his thesis.
Chapter 1: Explanation of the Fall of Rome; Uses interesting ideas for modern political reference which are strangely prophetic in TrumpAmerica
Chapter 2: Breaks down Augustine and talks about the art of his skillful Latin in the context of other writers and philosophers of the age; Cahill states that Confessions is the first autobiographical memoir of all of history opening up the world to psychology and the notion of consciousness; Also talks about Paul’s letters as well as Cicero, Plato and Virgil in a readable, not overly academic manner
Chapter 3: Various poetry and ballads from Irish literature comparing to other cultures such as the Greeks and highlighting traits that are make the Irish unique
Chapter 4: Beautiful insight and enlightening Biography about St. Patrick. He is the adopted father to the Irish people. Gets rid of slavery. Establishes the church and monasteries which is the founding of Christianity in Ireland. Cahill also makes an interesting comparison between St. Patrick’s Confessions and perspective and St. Augustine. Early church fathers who had a great influence on the growth of Christianity.
50 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Ubermonkey says thumbs up

THE GOOD: I thought this book was entertaining and mildly informative. I know, as a piece that is supposed to tell us how the Irish saved us all, maybe "mildly informative" isn't the best way to describe it. But, I consider this book to be in the category of "history-light" - as in - there is some historical context but this is not the book you want to read for heavy Celtic information. It is similar to some punk bands now adays...where some people may consider Blink 182 a punk band, they are in fact, "punk-light" meaning they are "punk" for people who really don't want to delve into what punk really is...if that makes sense...overall, Cahill does write in an entertaining way and I never really found myself skipping or glossing over sections of this book.

THE BAD: Well, the bad is in fact that the book is "history-light." I should have known by the small size of the book (260 some odd pages or so) that the writer wasn't going to submerge us into Celtic or Irish history. I would have preferred something a little more in depth.

THE UGLY: At first I thought that Cahill was something of a Irish-uber-all-ist until I saw the titles of his other books. There were times when he presented the Irish as the grand masters of all good while others, typically those who looked at the Irish with disdain, were mere knuckleheaded cavemen. The title presents itself to be a grand occasion, telling all the readers that we will learn how the Irish saved the world...however, up until the last pages, when Cahill actually wrote "..and that is how the Irish saved civilization." I was confused as to what exactly the Irish did to achieve such a compliment. I think calling the book, "How the Irish HELPED Civilization" would be more appropriate.

Ubermonkey says that all in all, this book is a short and entertaining read. But if you are looking for deep historical value here, you will not find it. Seaerch elsewhere.
23 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An interesting novel with flaws and historical misconception

The book takes place during the Middle Ages of European history and a little before and after it. The title of the book for one thing is one of the things that make you want to instantly pick up the book. "Wow, did the Irish really save civilization?" you think to yourself. However, reading into the book I slowly became more and more disappointed. The author's premise is that since the Irish basically kept libraries of all the famous philosophical works and classical literature from Greece and Rome and such during the Middle Ages, an age when much literature was destroyed, they saved civilization so that after the Middle Ages ended these books were still in existence to guide people.

There are a few main points in the book I thoroughly disagreed with, though to be fair the book is overall decent. My first main point is that this was almost solely Greco-Roman literature. The other continents thus were less affected by the events occurring in Ireland. The books title should therefore not be "How the Irish Saved Civilization", more like "How the Irish Saved Europe", and even that is a stretch, going into my next point against the book.
The book also has a few historical abnormalities, for instance, the quote "a small defensible state" (a quote from the book, and ironically another amazon.com reviewer's review) is used to define the Greeks and their downfall. Unless my history is much mistaken, right before the Greeks fell, they were far from a small defensible state. As one reviewer Dell Dunn said"But from the outset the author blatently showed that supporting his personal theories is more important than providing a balanced look at history."

Literature, while a decent portion of a civilized society, is not an entire civilization in itself. A stable political system, stable economy, and human rights are also needed for a society to exist. You could argue against this by saying that literature is the backbone of it all, but literature wouldn't have disappeared without the Irish. In fact, the book even admits that some small libraries in Europe survived the Middle Ages, the Irish just kept better libraries. So thus we need to modify the title of the book once again. The new title should be "How the Irish Kept Better Libraries during the Middle Ages than Europe".

That's more than enough trashing the downsides of the book, now onto what I liked about the novel. I really liked the part about Christianity. The book claims correctly (in my opinion) that basically the Irish kept a better or more "pure" form of Christianity. Thomas Cahill explains that post-Roman Empire Europe was nearly without Christianity, and that the Irish monks brought it back to Europe in a better form than it was before the Dark Ages in terms of the ethics involved in the religion. I will grant Cahill that Christianity would be far less popular or as "pure" without the Irish, although ironically that could be a good or a bad thing, with Christianity's history of destroying other religions. I will concede to Cahill that Europe may not have recovered from the Dark Ages as quickly without the Irish monks coming to Europe, nevertheless I am still convinced that even without the Irish, European civilization would have completely recovered.

In conclusion, I give this book a 2 star. While a few of the parts were interesting and mostly true, the majority of the book was just exaggerating the Irish history.
23 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The story remains untold!

This book is a nice little tale about early Ireland and the Europe of the late Roman / Early Middle Ages. We get to know lots about Irish mythology, heroic tales, sexual attitudes etc. Also this book overflows with Latin quotations and the such. What is missing is the story promissed in the title: how the Irish saved civilisation.
It tells us how the Irish got letters and Christianity, practising both with the zeal of the newly-converted. The story of the Irish missionarys on the continent gets a glance at best, as a background to the tale of some very colorful Irish madmen (? / saints?).
The tale the author promises in the title could be there, even if it remains doubtful if the Irish monks could be credided with saving (Christian) civilisation. What about Cyrill and Method? And even Cahill acknoledges that there were missionarys from other parts of the (western, Latin) Christian world as well. Unfortunately he won't discuss it in this book.
Less Irish tales would have been helpful. This way the book remains faithful to its subtitle: The Untold Story ... . It remains untold.
21 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Relatively Accurate but Simplified History

Cahill writes in an extremely compelling manner. I enjoy his prose greatly. His works are quick and entertaining reads. That said, he often goes overboard on his books and his theses, and simplifies complex history. He did this with The Gifts of the Jews and he does it here with How the Irish Saved Civilization.

Cahill is right that certain ancient and medieval civilizations hold a prominent place in the development and advancement of ideas and thought systems that govern much of the modern world. The Irish undoubtedly are one of them. Irish Christianity preserved a lot of classical learning of the Greeks and early Christian texts. They re-introduced these ideas to continental Europe and were key in the spread of monasticism. However, to claim that the Irish actually "saved" civilization is going a little too far. Saving what Cahill calls "civilization" was a joint effort that included the Irish, the Anglo-Saxons, the Franks, the Normans, the Byzantines, and the Arab Muslims, Turks, and Persians. In fact, during the Carolingian Renaissance undertaken by Charlemagne in the early 9th century, there was a flowering of Christian and classical learning undertaken by scholars brought from both Ireland and Anglo-Saxon England. The primary character in this was Alcuin, an Anglo-Saxon monk. Alcuin was primarily responsible for establishing schools and re-introducing classic philosophy, literacy, and rhetoric. Classical texts were preserved in England as well as Ireland. Ireland did play a prominent role, shared by the Anglo-Saxons. And the Franks were the ones who ultimately established the tradition of European Christianity and its strong basis in society and culture.

The Roman civilization did not truly fall until the mid-15th century. People forget very easily that it was only the western Empire that fell in the 5th century, the east continued for another thousand years under the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantines did not destroy or forget classical learning. Byzantine Christianity was characterized by philosophical speculation in continuance of the ancient Greek manner. The emperor Justinian also codified Roman civil law, which became the basis for the continental legal structure. When the Arab Muslims began rising and conquering the Byzantine Empire, much of that classical learning in philosophy, medicine, and mathematics was not only preserved but expanded upon by the Muslims. The Muslims excelled in fields such as trigonometry, algebra (an Arabic word), medicine and anatomy. And the Muslims preserved at least one tradition that all of Europe, including the Irish had lost: Aristotelian philosophy. Platonism and neo-Platonism was the primary philosophical bent among medieval Christendom, it wasn't until the Muslims reintroduced Aristotle to Europe, at their world-class university in Cordoba, Spain that a new era began that led to the empirical, scientific exploration of the world preceding and carried on by the Italian Renaissance. We also have a Muslim woman to thank for the discovery of vaccination, brought back to Europe by Lady Montagu.

As another review pointed out, "civilization" means more than the Christian texts. It is politics, culture, economics, science, philosophy, language, etc. The Irish had little to do with many of these things, for which we have the Anglo-Saxons, Norman English, the French, the Italian, the Byzantine, the Muslims, among others to thank for. Oh, and I forgot to mention the Scots. History is a very complicated affair; beware of simplified conclusions. The Irish DID play a role in the development of the medieval and modern worlds, however, civilization would have turned out just fine without them.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Did you actually read the book, or just attack the title?

I was actually shocked when I read some of the reviews for this book. I found the book entertaining and enlightening. The title of the book is meant to grab your attention, and I'll admit it wasn't what I expected. He did get me to pick up the book. Have you ever tried to sell a book? That's what you want. He posits a theory, like any other scholar and defends it well. If you don't happen to AGREE with him, that's certainly allowed, but it doesn't entitle you to say that it's a horrible book. If you have your own historical theory to defend, then write your own book. I was happy to read a book that covered an area in between Romanized Britain and the Middle Ages. They simply aren't that easy to find. Also, this isn't a text book. You don't get a degree in history after reading it. It does make you want to learn more, because it's an intriguing survey of a particular transitional time in Europe, and actually Britain if you want to be more accurate. Judged on the basis of its actual intention and purpose, I think it's a great book. And Spandiard, I hate to argue with you because it seems pointless, but he never says Patrick was Irish, he goes over EXACTLY who he was. He actually goes to great length discussing the irony of his affinity for the very people who kidnapped and enslaved him. I really have to wonder if you even read the book.
18 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Worth Reading

Cahill is a very skilled writer and many will find this a fascinating read. He is also a skillful researcher. Unfortunately Cahill seems to be unable to see characters outside of his twenty first-century context. He essentially ignores any evidence to the contrary (Historian John Bury for one) and describes Patrick as a devil may care schismatic. Then with the same myopic twist proceeds to paint Saint Augustine as a bitter representative of a dying religion. He bemoans the fact the Church has followed Saint Augustine, gleefully reports an instance of ceremonial bestiality, for some reason which only he is aware of, inserts gratuitous profanity, and insanely credits Irish piety as a chance to out "Victorian" the English. Still all in all the pluses out weigh the minuses and this book is worth reading.
18 people found this helpful