How Democracies Die
How Democracies Die book cover

How Democracies Die

Hardcover – January 16, 2018

Price
$6.99
Format
Hardcover
Pages
320
Publisher
Crown
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1524762933
Dimensions
6.25 x 1.25 x 9 inches
Weight
15.2 ounces

Description

“Levitsky and Ziblatt show how democracies have collapsed elsewhere—not just through violent coups, but more commonly (and insidiously) through a gradual slide into authoritarianism.... How Democracies Die is a lucid and essential guide toxa0what can happen here.” — The New York Times “If you want to understand what’s happening to our country, the book you really need to read is How Democracies Die .”— Paul Krugman “Fair warning: reading Levitsky and Ziblatt will leave you very, very unsettled. They make a powerful case that we really and truly are in uncharted territory, living in a moment when the line between difficult times and dark times has blurred.”— Washington Monthly “Carefully researched and persuasive... the authors show the fragility of even the best democracies and also caution politicians... who think they can somehow co-opt autocrats without getting burned.... How Democracies Die provides a guide for Americans of all political persuasions for what to avoid.” — USA Today “Scholarly and readable, alarming and level-headed… the greatest of the many merits of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt’s contribution to what will doubtless be the ballooning discipline of democracy death studies is their rejection of western exceptionalism. There are no vaccines in American (or, I would add, British) culture that protects us: just ways of doing business that now feel decrepit.”— The Guardian "[An] important new book." —Nicholas Kristof, The New York Times “The political-science text in vogue this winter is How Democracies Die .” — The New Yorker “How Democracies Die studies the modern history of apparently healthy democracies that have slid into autocracy. It is hard to read this fine book without coming away terribly concerned about the possibility Trump might inflict a mortal wound on the health of the republic.... It is simplistic to expect boots marching in the streets, but there will be a battle for democracy.”— Jonathan Chait , New York magazine “The great strength of Levitsky and Ziblatt’s How Democracies Die is that it rejects the exceptionalist account of US democracy. Their lens is comparative. The authors say America is not immune to the trends that have led to democracy’s collapse in other parts of the world.” — Financial Times "A powerful wake-up call." —Foreign Affairs “The big advantage of political scientists over even the shrewdest and luckiest of eavesdropping journalists is that they have the training to give us a bigger picture.... [Levitsky and Ziblatt] bring to bear useful global and historical context... [showing] the mistakes democratic politicians make as they let dangerous demagogues into the heart of power.” — The Sunday Times “If this were fiction, the thrills of this book would remind you of the thrills you had when you first read 1984 , It Can’t Happen Here , The Plot Against America and The Handmaid’s Tale . If this were fiction, you could lie in the sand and enjoy the read. But this book is not fiction. And this book is not just about the past.xa0And this book is not just about other countries.xa0[It] should be on your reading list this summer.” —Tufts Now “The authors argue, with good evidence, that democracies aren’t destroyed because of the impulses of a single man; they are, instead, degraded in the course of a partisan tit-for-tat dynamic that degrades norms over time until one side sees an opening to deliver the death blow. Donald Trump is not a dictator. But it’s impossible to read How Democracies Die without worrying that our collective decay of democratic norms may open the door to one down the line—perhaps even one of an entirely different ideological persuasion.” —Thexa0Wall Street Journal "Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt offer one of the best forensic accounts available of the crimes against democracy in America.... The diagnosis is compelling, and their book is essential, even compulsive, reading.” — Survival: Global Politics and Strategy “[ How Democracies Die ] is a stellar deep-dive into a series of modern democracies that ceased to be.” —Daily Kos "Maybe have a drink before digging into this one. Levitsky and Ziblatt trace the fall of democracies throughout history with agonizing clarity, going right up to our current perilous moment." —Entertainment Weekly “Levitsky and Ziblatt are not entirely pessimistic… but they leave readers in no doubt that they should be worried about the state of American democracy.” — Slate “Chilling… A provocative analysis of the parallels between Donald Trump's ascent and the fall of other democracies.”— Kirkus Reviews "Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt have offered a brilliant diagnosis of the most important issue facing our world: Can democracy survive? With clinical precision and an extraordinary grasp of history, they point to the warning signs of decay and define the obligations of those who would preserve free government. If there is an urgent book for you to read at this moment, it is How Democracies Die." — E.J. Dionne Jr. , co-author of One Nation After Trump "Levitsky and Ziblatt are leading scholars of democracy in other parts of the world, who with great energy and integrity now apply their expertise to the current problems of the United States. The reader feels the intellectual excitement, and also the political warning, as the authors draw the connections from their own vast knowledge to the chaos that we experience each day." — Timothy Snyder , author of On Tyranny “We live in perilous times. Anyone who is concerned about the future of American democracy should read this brisk, accessible book. Anyone who is not concerned should definitely read it.” —Daron Acemoglu ,xa0co-author of Why Nations Fail “Readers will not find an anti-Trump screed in How Democracies Die . The book is more erudite than alarmist… but that makes [Levitsky and Ziblatt’s] clarity on the risk of both Trump and wider political developments all the more powerful.” — California magazine "All Americans who care about the future of their country should read this magisterial, compelling book, which sweeps across the globe and through history to analyze how democracies die. The result is an unforgettable framework for diagnosing the state of affairs here at home and our prospects for recovery."— Danielle Allen , author of Our Declaration and Cuz "Two years ago, a book like this could not have been written: two leading political scientists who are expert in the breakdown of democracy in other parts of the world using that knowledge to inform Americans of the dangers their democracy faces today. We owe the authors a debt of thanks for bringing their deep understanding to bear on the central political issue of the day." —Francis Fukuyama , author of Political Order and Political Decay "In this brilliant historical synthesis, Levitsky and Ziblatt show how the actions of elected leaders around the world have paved the road to democratic failure, and why the United States is now vulnerable to this same downward spiral. This book should be widely and urgently read as a clarion call to restore the shared beliefs and practices—beyond our formal constitution—that constitute the essential ‘guardrails’ for preserving democracy."— Larry Diamond , author of The Spirit of Democracy “Thorough and well-argued… the biggest strength of How Democracies Die is its bluntness of language in describing American history—a bluntness that often goes missing when we discuss our own past.” — Pacific Standard “Required reading for every American… [ How Democracies Die ] shows the daily slings and arrows that can gradually crush our liberties, without the drama of a revolution or a military coup.” — The Philadelphia Inquirer Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt are Professors of Government at Harvard University. Levitsky’s research focuses on Latin America and the developing world. He is the author of Competitive Authoritarianism and is the recipient of numerous teaching awards. Ziblatt studies Europe from the nineteenth century to the present. He is the author, most recently, of Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy . Both Levitsky and Ziblatt have written for Vox and The New York Times , among other publications. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. We tend to think of democracies dying at the hands of men with guns. During the Cold War, coups d’état accounted for nearly three out of every four democratic breakxaddowns, and more rexadcently, military coups toppled Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in 2013 and Thai Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra in 2014. In these cases democracy dissolved in spectacular fashion, through military power and coercion. But there is another way to break a democracy. It is less draxadmatic but equally destructive. In Venezuela, for example, Hugo Chávez was a political outsider who railed against what he cast as a corrupt governxading elite, promising to build a more “authentic” democracy that used the country’s vast oil wealth to improve the lives of the poor. Skillfully tapping into the anger of ordinary Venezuelans, many of whom felt ignored or mistreated by the established political parties, Chávez was elected president in 1998. As a woman in Chávez’s home state of Barinas put it on election night, “Democracy is infected. And Chávez is the only antibiotic we have.” When Chávez launched his promised revolution, he did so democratically. In 1999, he held free elections for a new constituent assembly, in which his allies won an overwhelming majority. It wasn’t until 2003 that Chávez took his first clear steps toward authoritarianism, stalling a referendum that would have recalled him from office. In 2004, the government blacklisted those who had signed the recall petition and packed the supreme court. The chavista regime grew more repressive after 2006, closing a major television station, arresting or exiling opposition politicians, judges, and media figures on dubious charges, and eliminating presidential term limits so that Chávez could remain in power indefinitely. After Chávez’s death a year later, his successor, Nicolás Maduro, won another questionable reelection. It was only when a new single-party constituent assembly usurped the power of Congress in 2017, nearly two decades after Chávez first won the presidency, that Venezuela was widely recognized as an autocracy. This is how democracies now die. Blatant dictatorship—in the form of fascism, communism, or military rule—has disxadappeared across much of the world. Military coups and other violent seizures of power are rare. Most countries hold regular elections. Since the end of the Cold War, most democratic breakdowns have been caused not by generals and soldiers but by elected govxadernments themselves. Like Chávez in Venezuela, elected leaders have subverted democratic institutions in Georgia, Hungary, Nicaragua, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, Sri Lanka, Turkey, and Ukraine. Democratic backsliding today begins at the ballot box. xa0 How vulnerable is American democracy to this form of breakdown? The foundations of our democracy are certainly stronxadger than those in Venezuela, Turkey, or Hungary. But are they strong enough? Answering such a question requires stepping back from daily headlines and breaking news alerts to widen our view, drawing lessons from the experiences of other democracies around the world and throughout history. We know that extremist demagogues emerge from time to time in all societies, even in healthy democracies. The United States has had its share of them, including Henry Ford, Huey Long, Joseph McCarthy, and George Wallace. An essential test for democracies is not whether such figures emerge but whether political leaders, and especially political parties, work to prevent them from gaining power in the first place—by keeping them off mainstream party tickets, refusing to endorse or align with them, and when necessary, making common cause with rivals in support of democratic candidates. Once a would‑be authoritarian makes it to power, democraxadcies face a second critical test: Will the autocratic leader subvert democratic institutions or be constrained by them? America failed the first test in November 2016, when we elected a president with a dubious allegiance to democratic norms. How serious is the threat now? Many observers take comfort in our Constitution, which was designed precisely to thwart and contain demagogues like Donald Trump. Our Madisonian system of checks and balances has endured for more than two centuries. It survived the Civil War, the Great Depression, the Cold War, and Watergate. Surely, then, it will be able to survive Trump. We are less certain. Historically, our system of checks and balances has worked pretty well— but not, or not entirely, because of the constitutional system designed by the founders. Democracies work best— and survive longer— where constitutions are reinforced by unwritten democratic norms. Two basic norms have preserved America’s checks and balances in ways we have come to take for granted: mutual toleration, or the understanding that competing parties accept one another as legitimate rivals, and forbearance, or the idea that politicians should exercise restraint in deploying their institutional prerogatives. The erosion of our democratic norms began in the 1980s and 1990s and accelerated in the 2000s. By the time Barack Obama became president, many Republicans, in particular, questioned the legitimacy of their Democratic rivals and had abandoned forbearance for a strategy of winning by any means necessary. Donald Trump may have accelerated this process, but he didn’t cause it. The weakening of our democratic norms is rooted in extreme partisan polarization— one that ex-tends beyond policy differences into an existential conflict over race and culture. And if one thing is clear from studying breakdowns throughout history, it’s that extreme polarization can kill democracies. There are, therefore, reasons for alarm. Not only did Americans elect a demagogue in 2016, but we did so at a time when the norms that once protected our democracy were already coming unmoored. But if other countries’ experiences teach us how democracies can die at the hands of elected officials, they also teach us that breakdown is neither inevitable nor irreversible. Many Americans are justifiably frightened by what is happening to our country. But protecting our democracy requires more than just fright or outrage. We must be humble and bold. We must learn from other countries to see the warning signs— and recognize the false alarms. We must be aware of the fateful missteps that have wrecked other democracies. And we must see how citizens have risen to meet the great democratic crises of the past, overcoming their own deep-seated divisions to avert breakdown. History doesn’t repeat itself. But it rhymes. The promise of history, and the hope of this book, is that we can find the rhymes before it is too late. xa0 Reprinted from HOW DEMOCRACIES DIE Copyright © 2018 by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt. Published by Crown Publishers, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • NEW YORK TIMES
  • BESTSELLER • “Comprehensive, enlightening, and terrifyingly timely.”
  • The
  • New York Times Book Review
  • (Editors' Choice)
  • WINNER OF THE GOLDSMITH BOOK PRIZE • SHORTLISTED FOR THE LIONEL GELBER PRIZE • NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY
  • The Washington Post
  • Time
  • Foreign Affairs
  • • WBUR •
  • Paste
  • Donald Trump’s presidency has raised a question that many of us never thought we’d be asking: Is our democracy in danger? Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt have spent more than twenty years studying the breakdown of democracies in Europe and Latin America, and they believe the answer is yes. Democracy no longer ends with a bang—in a revolution or military coup—but with a whimper: the slow, steady weakening of critical institutions, such as the judiciary and the press, and the gradual erosion of long-standing political norms. The good news is that there are several exit ramps on the road to authoritarianism. The bad news is that, by electing Trump, we have already passed the first one. Drawing on decades of research and a wide range of historical and global examples, from 1930s Europe to contemporary Hungary, Turkey, and Venezuela, to the American South during Jim Crow, Levitsky and Ziblatt show how democracies die—and how ours can be saved.
  • Praise for
  • How Democracies Die
  • “What we desperately need is a sober, dispassionate look at the current state of affairs. Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, two of the most respected scholars in the field of democracy studies, offer just that.”
  • The Washington Post
  • “Where Levitsky and Ziblatt make their mark is in weaving together political science and historical analysis of both domestic and international democratic crises; in doing so, they expand the conversation beyond Trump and before him, to other countries and to the deep structure of American democracy and politics.”
  • Ezra Klein,
  • Vox
  • “If you only read one book for the rest of the year, read
  • How Democracies Die. . . .
  • This is not a book for just Democrats or Republicans. It is a book for all Americans. It is nonpartisan. It is fact based. It is deeply rooted in history. . . . The best commentary on our politics, no contest.”
  • —Michael Morrell, former Acting Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (via Twitter)
  • “A smart and deeply informed book about the ways in which democracy is being undermined in dozens of countries around the world, and in ways that are perfectly legal.”
  • —Fareed Zakaria,
  • CNN

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(3.3K)
★★★★
25%
(1.4K)
★★★
15%
(833)
★★
7%
(389)
-7%
(-389)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Not just preaching to the choir

This book is better than I expected. I teach in Japan about comparative constitutional law and politics, and bought this out of a sense of professional duty: I figured it would just be some Ivy League liberal professors using a few historical examples to explain (again) why Trump is dangerous. There already are a number of books with that message, such as Jan Werner Müller's excellent "What is Populism?" (2016). Yes, this book does have that message too, and it uses some of the same examples as Müller, including Hugo Chávez in Venezuela and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey. But it also goes beyond partisan diatribe in a couple of valuable ways.

The first is to illuminate the role of "norms" in a constitutional system. In this context, a "norm" is an unwritten standard of behavior that is followed for an extended period of time -- you might think of it as describing some type of behavior that's "normal." US law school profs are prone to point out several such norms, none of which are in the US Constitution as written: such as that US Supreme Court justices are lawyers, that members of the military retire from active duty before joining the Cabinet, and, prior to FDR in 1940, that Presidents not run for a third term. (These sorts of norm are often called "constitutional conventions" by political scientists -- not to be confused with the event in Philadelphia mentioned in the musical "Hamilton.") Individually, though, the loss of any of these highly specific norms wouldn't necessarily have a huge impact on the functioning of the government.

Levitsky & Ziblatt (L&Z) instead focus on some norms that are more abstract, but also more vital to the fabric of democracy. The norms of interest to them are "shared codes of conduct that become common knowledge within a particular community or society -- accepted, respected and enforced by its members" (@101). Two of the most important are (i) mutual toleration, i.e. the belief that political opponents are not enemies, and (ii) institutional forbearance, i.e. "avoiding actions that, while respecting the letter of the law, obviously violate its spirit" (@106). In more specific contexts several other such norms also come up, e.g. that presidents shouldn't undermine another coequal branch (such as the court system). Calling such norms the "guardrails of democracy," L&Z provide one of the clearest and most convincing expositions of them that I've read. Many presidents challenge norms -- such as when Teddy Roosevelt had dinner in the White House with a black man (Booker T. Washington), or Jimmy Carter and his wife walked part of the route to his inauguration -- but Pres. Trump stands out, they say, stands out "in his willingness to challenge unwritten rules of greater consequence" (@195). So far, some of his assaults on mutual toleration and institutional forbearance have been more rhetorical than actual: as I write this, he continues to revile Hilary Clinton but hasn't actually "locked her up." Unfortunately, the fact that in his first year Pres. Trump has only bumped into, but not yet broken through, such "guardrails" doesn't necessarily signify much about the future: see Table 3 @108, which shows that the now-authoritarian Erdoğan was at about the same place as Trump at the end of his first year.

But it's not only the president who is capable of breaking the norms -- Congress can as well. L&Z point out how the era of "constitutional hardball," emphasizing the letter over the spirit of the document, has roots as early as in the 1970s, when Newt Gingrich was a Congressional aspirant. It really came into its own after the 1994 mid-term elections, when Gingrich was elected Speaker. Although the Republicans seem to have begun this cycle of escalation, Democrats also participated, such as in removing the ability to filibuster most judicial nominations. L&Z use historical narratives to show how the disappearance (or nonexistence) of such norms in other countries allowed society to slide down the slope into authoritarianism.

The second and more surprising point of L&Z's historical study is that in the US the erosion of these two central norms is linked to matters of race. During most of the 20th Century conservative Republicans could cooperate with conservative Democrats, and liberal Democrats could cooperate with liberal Republicans. The stability of this bipartisanship rested to a great degree on the fact that political participation of racial minorities could be limited in a variety of ways, such as via a poll tax. As the civil rights movement picked up steam, and as the Hispanic population started to increase, it became clear that the Democratic party was minorities' preference. Around the first Reagan election in 1980 the previously traditional party alignments started to break down, and polarization set in. White voters in Southern states shifted to the Republican party. Concurrently, the divisiveness of the abortion issue following the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision was driving many religious voters toward the Republicans as well.

This is actually the most depressing aspect of the book. Unless he perpetrates a coup, Trump will pass; but the racial and religious source of hardball attitudes augurs ill for American politics into the indefinite future. The US is a multi-ethnic society in which no ethnicity is in the majority. L&Z point out that to date they haven't been able to identify any society like that which is both (i) a democracy and (ii) a society where all ethnicities are empowered politically, socially and economically.

In short, this isn't a "Chicken Little" book screaming hysterically to the already-persuaded about how terrible Donald Trump is. Rather, while pointing out some of the dangers posed acutely by Trump's handling of the presidency, it also identifies some much more long-term problems. The solutions proposed by L&Z, such as that Democrats shouldn't behave like the hardball Republican politicians, may strike some readers as weak and overly optimistic. But no solutions will eventuate if people aren't aware of how deep the problem really is, and for that reason this book deserves to be read widely.
1.1K people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Easy read but not of much value

I very much enjoy objective analysis of our current political and social situation and was given this book to read. Steven and Daniel have done a disservice to objective historians since they promulgate a leftist Democrat anti-Trump anti-Republican socialist agenda rather than an objective look at how democracies die.
It is easy to sell books to the choir when you are preaching to the choir. Looking at the extreme views in the reviews of the book it’s apparent that members of his social/political persuasion thought the work was monumental but readers not of their political persuasion saw bias in analysis and conclusions.
What looks from the title as a insightful analysis sadly is a use of a good outline to promote a particular political agenda and as such is of little academic value.
42 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Liberty or death

This book examines the answers to the question, ‘Is [the American] democracy dying? The authors claim that autocracy and authoritarianism, if given leeway, will end democracy as the Americans know it. Citing examples all over the world, from Chavez of Venezuela, Fujimori of Peru, and Hitler and Mussolini, explains how the governing elites by a ‘lethal mix of ambition, fear, and miscalculation conspired to lead them to the same fateful mistake: handing the keys of power to an autocrat-in-the making’. The leaders named all started on the wings of democracy but ended as tyrants. Are we beginning to get a sense of where the authors are going? Even as this review is being written, Donald Trump jokes that the new Chinese autocrat, Xi Jinping is good and asks perhaps that America should have a president for life.

American democracy depends on a number of guardrails, say the authors, and as soon as one sees signs of authoritarian behaviour – rejection of democratic rules of the game; denial of political opponents; tolerance and encouragement of violence; and a readiness to curtail liberties of opponents, including the media, he should start checking to see if the guard rails are in place and holding up.

In America, the guardrails are the other arms of power – congress and the judiciary, and they include the unwritten norms of government. The authors then scrutinise what is happening to those institutions in America, and they arrive at a pessimistic conclusion: all is not well. The principal chapter is entitled, ‘Trump against the Guardrails’. Things are going wrong, fast. Not only is the voting process affected by gerrymandering, Trump and the Republicans are altering the rules in the senate and congress to give them an edge over the Democrats. The authors explain how the nomination of judges were also implicated in the change.

What is happening, and what has to be done to save democracy? The authors fear that the increasing polarisation is not the answer – it is part of the problem. They quote Danielle Allen: ‘The simple fact of the matter is that the world has never built a democracy in which no particular ethnic group is in the majority and where political equality, social and economies that empower all have been achieved’. The authors agree: ‘This is America’s challenge. We cannot retreat from it’. The problem is, given the form of government that is uniquely American, with its two-party-in-a-check-and-balance system be repaired now that the fissures have become immense cracks?
25 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

It’s About Our Democracy − Not Trump’s Policies

These guys are thinking out of the box. And they’re not just speculating. They’ve studied the problem in at least a couple dozen cases that cover the waterfront, from Hitler to Franklin Roosevelt, and looked at what works and what doesn’t.

They focus most on the rise of polarization after the 1964 Civil Rights Act and on through Newt Gingrich's declaration that “You [Republicans] are fighting a war for power,” and then Fox News and the Tea Party. They include the Democrat’s retaliation, which also eroded democratic norms.

Having now arrived at a deeper level of polarization than at any time since the end of Reconstruction (1877), what can we do? Their prescription is surprising. First, don’t “fight like Republicans,” which is the most common response of Democrats. (Surely we can do better than copycat the worst of American politics.) Instead, build coalitions with dissimilar groups, even with adversaries. (We need help. This is not going to be easy.) They suggest looking for partners in the business community and among working-class whites and even evangelical Christians. There are others who want to preserve our country.

The key to understanding these recommendations is to think about democracy itself and not so much about Trump’s policies. Democracy is what matters most, and it is now in real danger − even if we could impeach Trump (which might make things worse).

Now you may not think their proposal makes sense after reading my two sentence explanation, so after you read their concluding chapter, read their book. And give them a fair hearing. I’ve been researching this area intensively for a year (to write something myself) and this is the most thorough, thoughtful and creative set of recommendations I’ve found.

They have not found the silver bullet, and some of their ideas seem unrealistic, but their foundation is solid. And it’s not just more of the same. Everyone concerned with America’s future should read (most of) this book.
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Is America Following a Well-Trodden Path toward Authoritarianism?

A truly frightening book that shows how America is following in the footsteps of other countries that have given up democracy for authoritarianism: countries like Hungary (now), Chile under Pinochet, Turkey (now), Germany in the 1930s, and Italy in the 1920s. The authors set forth four indications of danger: 1) rejection of democratic rules of the game, 2) denial of the legitimacy of political opponents, 3) toleration or encouragement of violence, and 4) readiness to curtail civil liberties of opponents, including media. Instances of all four have been increasing for a generation, but under Trump they are becoming SOP for the Executive Branch. How Democracies Die is a (figurative) call to arms for those who believe in American democracy.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Alarming And Insightful

The United States in 2018 is a polarized, angry place where, as I write this review, even the federal government has had to shut down because two of its three branches cannot come to an agreement. These are dark times, and as Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt explain, they are echoes of other dark times in other countries: Chile in 1973, Germany in 1932, Venezuela in 1998, among others. In those nations democracy died and was replaced by authoritarian/totalitarian regimes. Levitsky and Ziblatt's aim is to explain what happened elsewhere, point out the danger signs that our own nation is rushing to a similar fate, and finally to provide some hope by suggesting steps we can take to avoid the fatal plunge.

The metaphor used most often within these pages is of the national guard rails, which for so long have kept us on track, gradually softening or growing brittle and finally, breaking. No one who has paid attention to politics over the last years and decades can disagree that something has gone badly wrong in our civic life, and that the 2016 election and its aftermath have altered our country, possibly irrevocably. Levitsky and Ziblatt recap Trump's authoritarian tendencies, catalog the failure of political parties, Congress, and the courts to restrain him, and analyze what's happening here in comparison with what has happened elsewhere.

There's plenty of blame to go around, and the authors are not shy about naming names from both parties, including past Presidents. Levitsky and Ziblatt paint a bleak picture, but they do offer prescriptions for how the country can begin to emerge from its present darkness: greater civic engagement, real efforts at bipartisanship, and above all attempting to lower the temperature on the national debate by calling on us all to recognize that "the others" may also have the best interests of the nation (as they see them) at heart.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A must read

An uncomfortable read especially given today's political climate and current occupant of the White House.

Levitsky and Ziblatt explore how modern democracies aren't overthrown by violent coups, but by the steady errosion of norms and institutions. Bringing together historical insights and modern examples, the authors show that democracy is incredibly fragile. Authoritarians take advantage of a key vulnerability of many democracies: just how little of it is based on laws. Sure democracies have constitutions, but much of what makes a democracy thrive are unwritten rules, norms, and procedures.

One thing I found fascinating is the racial exclusion component of the political stability from Reconstruction to the 1980s. By ignoring racial injustice and full democratization, we had partisan civility and cooperation.

Authoritarians and those with authoritarian impulses (like Trump) take advantage of major political partisanship and use their power to undermine checks on that power. Weaving together history and today, the authors demonstrate that there is cause for worry when comparing Trump and a complicit Republican party to other countries with declining democracies.

Trump checks off the four indicators of authoritarian behavior:

1. Trump rejects or is weakly committed to the democratic rules of the game
2. He has denied the legitamacy of political opponents
3. He has tolerated or encouraged violence
4. He has demonstrated a readiness to the curtail civil liberties of opponents, especially the media

Our democracy is in danger. Congressional Republicans have often refused to be a proper check on the President. History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes, and the authors have provided a strong case that we all must work at protecting and supporting our weakening democracy.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Also reveals how Democracies can be alive and well

How Democracies Die is a superb book as it reveals how decisions were made in the past, the outcome and where we are along the same path. Please read this book. This is possibly the most readable and enlightening book I have ever read on democracy.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Finally, a fact based approach to understanding the crises we face!

For those serious about preserving the country that has provided the opportunities that have made each of us who we are! This is not an opinion masquerading as fact analysis. Instead, it is a systematic analysis based on contemporary case studies of similar situations in other countries with realistic performance based solutions. Extremely informative and highly relevant!
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Biased, but worth the read. Good hardcover binding.

How Democracies Die is a very thought-provoking and in depth look at how democracy has functioned around the world in the last century. Definitely for those interested in politics, and history, however, I do have a few problems with the book that you might want to know before you buy it. First, the book is well researched, and very well documented, but there is a clear bias among the authors of the text. I get that conservatism is not a very popular ideal in a lot of ways and that populism is very dangerous at times, but the authors seemingly shifted the blame onto conservative leaders for the intensified political polarization. I am a student of political science (About to receive a bachelor's degree) and never once has any of the scholarly journals that I have read blamed conservatism or conservative leaders for polarization in American politics. So the authors are explicitly biased.

Secondly, the structure of the book makes it a little harder to read. The book makes reference to many historic and political events throughout history, but after the full explanation goes back to addressing those events more implicitly, and does not expound upon some of the events thereafter.

Other than my few problems with the book, it was very informative and very interesting indeed. Definitely read it!
3 people found this helpful