Hannibal: A Novel
Hannibal: A Novel book cover

Hannibal: A Novel

Hardcover – Deckle Edge, June 8, 1999

Price
$14.06
Format
Hardcover
Pages
486
Publisher
Delacorte Press
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0739414125
Dimensions
6.5 x 1.75 x 9.75 inches
Weight
1.85 pounds

Description

Horror lit's head chef Harris serves up another course in his Hannibal "The Cannibal" Lecter trilogy, and it's a pièce de résistance for those with strong stomachs. In the first book, Red Dragon (filmed as Manhunter ), Hannibal diabolically helps the FBI track a fascinating serial killer. (Takes one to know one.) In The Silence of the Lambs , he advises fledgling FBI manhunter Clarice Starling, then makes a bloody, brilliant escape. Years later, posing as scholarly Dr. Fell, curator of a grand family's palazzo, Hannibal lives the good life in Florence, playing lovely tunes by serial killer/composer Henry VIII and killing hardly anyone himself. Clarice is unluckier: in the novel's action-film-like opening scene, she survives an FBI shootout gone wrong, and her nemesis, Paul Krendler, makes her the fall guy. Clarice is suspended, so, unfortunately, the first cop who stumbles on Hannibal is an Italian named Pazzi, who takes after his ancestors, greedy betrayers depicted in Dante's Inferno . Pazzi is on the take from a character as scary as Hannibal: Mason Verger. When Verger was a young man busted for raping children, his vast wealth saved him from jail. All he needed was psychotherapy--with Dr. Lecter. Thanks to the treatment, Verger is now on a respirator, paralyzed except for one crablike hand, watching his enormous, brutal moray eel swim figure eights and devour fish. His obsession is to feed Lecter to some other brutal pets. What happens when the Italian cop gets alone with Hannibal? How does Clarice's reunion with Lecter go from macabre to worse? Suffice it to say that the plot is Harris's weirdest, but it still has his signature mastery of realistic detail. There are flaws: Hannibal's madness gets a motive, which is creepy but lessens his mystery. If you want an exact duplicate of The Silence of the Lambs 's Clarice/Hannibal duel, you'll miss what's cool about this book--that Hannibal is actually upstaged at points by other monsters. And if you think it's all unprecedentedly horrible, you're right. But note that the horrors are described with exquisite taste. Harris's secret recipe for success is restraint. --Tim Appelo From Publishers Weekly This narrative roils along a herky-jerky vector but remains always mesmerizing, as Harris's prose and insights, particularly his reveries about Hannibal, boast power and an overripe beauty. If at times the suspense slackens and the story slips into silliness, it becomes clear that this is a post-suspense novel, as much sardonic philosophical jest as grand-guignol thriller. Hannibal, we learnA"we" because Harris seduces reader complicity with third-person-plural narrationAis not as we presumed. The monster's aim is not chaos, but order. Through his devotion to manners and the connoisseur's life, in fact to form itself, he hopesAconsciouslyAto reverse entropy and thus the flow of time, to allow a dead sister to live again. He is not Dionysius but Apollo, and it is the barbarians who oppose him who are to be despised. Hannibal may be mad, but in this brilliant, bizarre, absurd novelAas in the public eyeAhe is also hero; and so, at novel's end, in blackest humor, Harris bestows upon him a hero's rewards, outrageously, mockingly. Agent, Morton Janklow. 1.3 million first printing; film rights to Dino De Laurentis. (June) Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Library Journal Eleven years after thrilling readers with his classic suspense novel, Silence of the Lambs, Harris returns with a vengeance in this, the third and presumably final novel in the trilogy (the first was Red Dragon) featuring monstrous serial killer Dr. Hannibal Lecter. At the tale's outset, FBI agent Clarise Starling, young and ambitious in Silence, is slated to take the fall for a botched arrest. Yet when a manipulative millionaire revives the FBI's interest in the still-at-large Lecter, Starling is reunited with her mentor, Jack Crawford, and sets to work on tracking the good doctor. Although Harris's occasional lapses into baroque language and the novel's confusing, dreamy ending mar an otherwise perfect thriller, enormous patron demand makes this a necessary purchase in even the smallest public library.AMark Annichiarico, formerly with "Library Journal" Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc. "Strap yourself in for one heck of a ride—it'll scare your socks off."— Denver Post "Relentless— endlessly terrifying."— Los Angeles Times "Interested in getting the hell scared out of you? Buy this book on a Friday ... lock all doors and windows. And by Monday, you might just be able to sleep without a night-light." — Newsday Don't miss Thomas Harris's New York Times bestsellers: Red Dragon Black Sunday From the Inside Flap bal Lecter into the palace of your mind and be invited into his mind palace in turn.xa0xa0Note the similarities in yours and his, the high vaulted chambers of your dreams, the shadowed halls, the locked storerooms where you dare not go, the scrap of half-forgotten music, the muffled cries from behind a wall.In one of the most eagerly anticipated literary events of the decade, Thomas Harris takes us once again into the mind of a killer, crafting a chilling portrait of insidiously evolving evil--a tour de force of psychological suspense.xa0xa0Seven years have passed since Dr. Hannibal Lecter escaped from custody, seven years since FBI Special Agent Clarice Starling interviewed him in a maximum security hospital for the criminally insane.xa0xa0The doctor is still at large, pursuing his own ineffable interests, savoring the scents, the essences of an unguarded world.xa0xa0But Starling has never forgotten her encounters with Dr. Lecter, and the metallic r Thomas Harris began his writing career covering crime in the United States and Mexico, and was a reporter and editor for the Associated Press in New York City. His first novel, Black Sunday , was published in 1975, followed by Red Dragon in 1981, The Silence of the Lambs in 1988, and Hannibal in 1999. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Chapter Twenty One The Christian martyr San Miniato picked up his severed head from the sand of the Roman amphitheater in Florence and carried it beneath his arm to the mountainside across the river where he lies in his splendid church, tradition says.Certainly San Miniato's body, erect or not, passed en route along the ancient street where we now stand, the Via de' Bardi. The evening gathers now and the street is empty, the fan pattern of the cobbles shining in a winter drizzle not cold enough to kill the smell of cats. We are among the palaces built six hundred years ago by the merchant princes, the kingmakers and connivers of Renaissance Florence. Within bow-shot across the Arno River are the cruel spikes of the Signoria, where the monk Savonarola was hanged and burned, and that great meat house of hanging Christs, the Uffizi museum.These family palaces, pressed together in an ancient street, frozen in the modern Italian bureaucracy, are prison architecture on the outside, but they contain great and graceful spaces, high silent halls no one ever sees, draped with rotting, rain-streaked silk where lesser works of the great Renaissance masters hang in the dark for years, and are illuminated by the lightning after the draperies collapse.Here beside you is the palazzo of the Capponi, a family distinguished for a thousand years, who tore up a French king's ultimatum in his face and produced a pope.The windows of the Palazzo Capponi are dark now, behind their iron grates. The torch rings are empty. In that pane of crazed old glass is a bullet hole from the 1940s. Go closer. Rest your head against the cold iron as the policeman did and listen. Faintly you can hear a clavier. Bach's Goldberg Variations played, not perfectly, but exceedingly well, with an engaging understanding of the music. Played not perfectly, but exceedingly well; there is perhaps a slight stiffness in the left hand.If you believe you are beyond harm, will you go inside? Will you enter this palace so prominent in blood and glory, follow your face through the web-spanned dark, toward the exquisite chiming of the clavier? The alarms cannot see us. The wet policeman lurking in the doorway cannot see us. Come . . .Inside the foyer the darkness is almost absolute. A long stone staircase, the stair rail cold beneath our sliding hand, the steps scooped by the hundreds of years of footfalls, uneven beneath our feet as we climb toward the music.The tall double doors of the main salon would squeak and howl if we had to open them. For you, they are open. The music comes from the far, far corner, and from the corner comes the only light, light of many candles pouring reddish through the small door of a chapel off the corner of the room.Cross to the music. We are dimly aware of passing large groups of draped furniture, vague shapes not quite still in the candlelight, like a sleeping herd. Above us the height of the room disappears into darkness.The light glows redly on an ornate clavier and on the man known to Renaissance scholars as Dr. Fell, the doctor elegant, straight-backed as he leans into the music, the light reflecting off his hair and the back of his quilted silk dressing gown with a sheen like pelt.The raised cover of the clavier is decorated with an intricate scene of banquetry, and the little figures seem to swarm in the candlelight above the strings. He plays with his eyes closed. He has no need of the sheet music. Before him on the lyre-shaped music rack of the clavier is a copy of the American trash tabloid the National Tattler. It is folded to show only the face on the front page, the face of Clarice Starling.Our musician smiles, ends the piece, repeats the saraband once for his own pleasure and as the last quill-plucked string vibrates to silence in the great room, he opens his eyes, each pupil centered with a red pinpoint of light. He tilts his head to the side and looks at the paper before him.He rises without sound and carries the American tabloid into the tiny, ornate chapel, built before the discovery of America. As he holds it up to the light of the candles and unfolds it, the religious icons above the altar seem to read the tabloid over his shoulder, as they would in a grocery line. The type is seventy-two-point Railroad Gothic. It says "DEATH ANGEL: CLARICE STARLING, THE FBI'S KILLING MACHINE." Faces painted in agony and beatitude around the altar fade as he snuffs the candles. Crossing the great hall he has no need of light. A puff of air as Dr. Hannibal Lecter passes us. The great door creaks, closes with a thud we can feel in the floor. Silence.Footsteps entering another room. In the resonances of this place, the walls feel closer, the ceiling still high--sharp sounds echo late from above--and the still air holds the smell of vellum and parchment and extinguished candlewicks.The rustle of paper in the dark, the squeak and scrape of a chair. Dr. Lecter sits in a great armchair in the fabled Capponi Library. His eyes reflect light redly, but they do not glow red in the dark, as some of his keepers have sworn they do. The darkness is complete. He is considering. . . .It is true that Dr. Lecter created the vacancy at the Palazzo Capponi by removing the former curator--a simple process requiring a few seconds' work on the old man and a modest outlay for two bags of cement--but once the way was clear he won the job fairly, demonstrating to the Belle Arti Committee an extraordinary linguistic capability, sight-translating medieval Italian and Latin from the densest Gothic black-letter manuscripts.He has found a peace here that he would preserve--he has killed hardly anybody, except his predecessor, during his residence in Florence.His appointment as translator and curator of the Capponi Library is a considerable prize to him for several reasons:The spaces, the height of the palace rooms, are important to Dr. Lecter after his years of cramped confinement. More important, he feels a resonance with the palace; it is the only private building he has ever seen that approaches in dimension and detail the memory palace he has maintained since youth.In the library, this unique collection of manuscripts and correspondence going back to the early thirteenth century, he can indulge a certain curiosity about himself.Dr. Lecter believed, from fragmentary family records, that he was descended from a certain Giuliano Bevisangue, a fearsome twelfth-century figure in Tuscany, and from the Machiavelli as well as the Visconti. This was the ideal place for research. While he had a certain abstract curiosity about the matter, it was not ego-related. Dr. Lecter does not require conventional reinforcement. His ego, like his intelligence quota, and the degree of his rationality, is not measurable by conventional means.In fact, there is no consensus in the psychiatric community that Dr. Lecter should be termed a man. He has long been regarded by his professional peers in psychiatry, many of whom fear his acid pen in the professional journals, as something entirely Other. For convenience they term him "monster."The monster sits in the black library, his mind painting colors on the dark and a medieval air running in his head. He is considering the policeman.Click of a switch and a low lamp comes on.Now we can see Dr. Lecter seated at a sixteenth-century refectory table in the Capponi Library. Behind him is a wall of pigeonholed manuscripts and great canvas-covered ledgers going back eight hundred years. A fourteenth-century correspondence with a minister of the Republic of Venice is stacked before him, weighted with a small casting Michelangelo did as a study for his horned Moses, and in front of the inkstand, a laptop computer with on-line research capability through the University of Milan.Bright red and blue among the dun and yellow piles of parchment and vellum is a copy of the National Tattler. And beside it, the Florence edition of La Nazione. Dr. Lecter selects the Italian newspaper and reads its latest attack on Rinaldo Pazzi, prompted by an FBI disclaimer in the case of Il Mostro. "Our profile never matched Tocca," an FBI spokesman said. La Nazione cited Pazzi's background and training in America, at the famous Quantico academy, and said he should have known better.The case of Il Mostro did not interest Dr. Lecter at all, but Pazzi's background did. How unfortunate that he should encounter a policeman trained at Quantico, where Hannibal Lecter was a textbook case. When Dr. Lecter looked into Rinaldo Pazzi's face at the Palazzo Vecchio, and stood close enough to smell him, he knew for certain that Pazzi suspected nothing, even though he had asked about the scar on Dr. Lecter's hand. Pazzi did not even have any serious interest in him regarding the curator's disappearance.The policeman saw him at the exposition of torture instruments. Better to have encountered him at an orchid show.Dr. Lecter was well aware that all the elements of epiphany were present in the policeman's head, bouncing at random with the million other things he knew.Should Rinaldo Pazzi join the late curator of the Palazzo Vecchio down in the damp? Should Pazzi's body be found after an apparent suicide? La Nazione would be pleased to have hounded him to death.Not now, the monster reflected, and turned to his great rolls of vellum and parchment manuscripts.Dr. Lecter does not worry. He delighted in the writing style of Neri Capponi, banker and emissary to Venice in the fifteenth century, and read his letters, aloud from time to time, for his own pleasure late into the night. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Invite Hannibal Lecter into the palace of your mind and be invited into his mind palace in turn. Note the similarities in yours and his, the high vaulted chambers of your dreams, the shadowed halls, the locked storerooms where you dare not go, the scrap of half-forgotten music, the muffled cries from behind a wall.In one of the most eagerly anticipated literary events of the decade, Thomas Harris takes us once again into the mind of a killer, crafting a chilling portrait of insidiously evolving evil—a tour de force of psychological suspense. Seven years have passed since Dr. Hannibal Lecter escaped from custody, seven years since FBI Special Agent Clarice Starling interviewed him in a maximum security hospital for the criminally insane. The doctor is still at large, pursuing his own ineffable interests, savoring the scents, the essences of an unguarded world. But Starling has never forgotten her encounters with Dr. Lecter, and the metallic rasp of his seldom-used voice still sounds in her dreams. Mason Verger remembers Dr. Lecter, too, and is obsessed with revenge. He was Dr. Lecter's sixth victim, and he has survived to rule his own butcher's empire. From his respirator, Verger monitors every twitch in his worldwide web. Soon he sees that to draw the doctor, he must have the most exquisite and innocent-appearing bait; he must have what Dr. Lecter likes best. Powerful, hypnotic, utterly original,
  • Hannibal
  • is a dazzling feast for the imagination. Prepare to travel to hell and beyond as a master storyteller permanently alters the world you thought you knew.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(1.5K)
★★★★
25%
(1.2K)
★★★
15%
(740)
★★
7%
(345)
23%
(1.1K)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Good storytelling, bad story

Thomas Harris lured me into this book with his reputation ("Silence of the Lambs") and kept me there, albeit reluctantly, with his skills as a writer. Unfortunately, in the case of "Hannibal," the plot leaves a lot to be desired. The whole thing was so bizarre that I had to finish it just to see how it turned out, but did I like what I was reading? Not so much. I'm referring specifically to the ending, which I thought was absolutely ridiculous. I can't accept that the Clarice Starling readers have come to know, admire, and even love, would ever run off with Lecter.
As far as the other characters are concerned, the new ones are so far over the top as to be completely unrealistic (Mason and Margot), and most of those we remember from "Silence" behave in ways that are just too outrageous to be credible. I finished this book and just sat with my mouth open, unable to believe what I had just read. "Sex is a splendid structure they add to every day," is not a sentence I ever wanted to read about Starling and Lecter. It's just...wrong. Granted, these are Harris' characters and he can do with them what he likes, but I think he dropped the ball on this one.
My last complaint: Harris' clumsy attempts to explain the origin of Hannibal's evil. He should have left well enough alone. To me, it is much scarier *not* to know why Hannibal Lecter is the way he is; it leaves open the possibility that it anyone could become such a monster. I imagine people had their own theories, and when something like that is left to the reader's imagination, it can assume many shapes. When Harris gives us Lecter's backstory, as unusual as it may be, he forever closes the door on our possibilities, and thereby reduces Lecter as a villain, although he does perhaps become somewhat more sympathetic a character. I don't think we needed to know *why* Lecter is evil; it is enough to simply know that he is.
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An Underrated and Challenging Gem of a Horror Novel

I can't say I'm surprised at the mixed reviews here. I first read Hannibal the week it came out in hardcover. I finished it in three or four days, and found it one of the ugliest, most depressing stories I have ever read. As others have suggested here, the ending was entirely unbelievable, and near ruined the entire book for me. But...
With the release of the movie version this February (2001), I decided to go back and re-read all of Harris' "Lecter" books, in order: Red Dragon, The Silence of the Lambs, and Hannibal. I thought maybe I'd find a progression of character and relationship that would make the end of Hannibal more palatable, if not believable. For any reader who still has copies of all three books, I encourage you to read them, back-to-back. I can't promise that the ending of Hannibal will make total sense, but I found the exercise totally enjoyable. The first two books still hold up as classics of the genre, and Hannibal emerges as a daring, more experimental extension of the Starling/Lecter relationship that emerged in the second book.
One disappointing thing about reading all three in quick succession: I realized that TSOTL is really just a retelling of Red Dragon -- they both involve the FBI's hunt for a serial killer, and in both books, the Bureau turns to Dr. Lecter for help. Lecter's cat-and-mouse games with the FBI make both books shine, but Harris outdoes himself with the Starling/Lecter relationship in TSOTL, making it, at least for me, the better book.
It's this relationship that Harris tackles in Hannibal, and if you found it (the relationship) to be the most interesting and frightening thing about TSOTL, you really can't miss Hannibal. On rereading it, I appreciated Harris' refusal to simply tell another FBI v. serial killer tale -- this book has psychological depth that few horror/thriller books ever come close to. It's fascinating and subtle, exciting and well-written. If the end stretches things a bit too far, so what? The ride was exhilarating and challenging, and the ending will leave you thinking about it for days, refusing to accept it.
And perhaps that's the point . . .
16 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Can I give it less than one star?

Tsk, tsk....Who could imagine that Hannibal Lecter would be *gasp* boring and silly? I've long admired Harris for his character development and knack for nail-biting suspense. He seems to take his time between novels which leads to rich, frightening reads. HANNIBAL, to me, seemed rushed and juvenile. So unlike you, Mr. Harris!

From the very beginning, favorite characters from SILENCE OF THE LAMBS and RED DRAGON do not behave consistently with the way they were originally written. I think Starling must have suffered several blows to the head to act as she did in this one. The entire sequence with her and Hannibal alone together is just not believable. And the scenes in Italy are uninteresting at best.

Several times I wanted to put this novel away for good but kept reading in hopes that it would improve. Unfortunately, it just got worse and worse. If you have to read it, save some money and buy the paperback. I rushed out to buy it in hardback when it was released, and that hardback is now sitting in my "to be donated" box. I'm very disappointed, Mr. Harris. I'm a hardcore horror fan, and reading this novel took up time I could have used to read something worthwhile.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

MAGNIFICENTLY MACABRE

It's seven years after Starling's success of tracking Buffalo Bill and the subsequent escape of Dr. Hannibal Lecter. Clarice's career has stalled, ironically as a result of her early success. Clarice is under investigation after a high profile shooting when she gets some encouraging words from an admirer.....Hannibal Lecter. The manhunt for Lecter is in full swing with a little push from Lecter's only surviving victim, Mason Verger. Verger proves to be as menacing as Lecter and his obessesion with Hannibal puts Clarice in danger.
The tale of Clarice and Hannibal reaches a feverish pace as the hunt goes on and Clarice's career starts to fall apart. The presence of Verger, a man so vile and evil, actually causes the reader to cheer for Hannibal Lecter. Only the quick pen of Thomas Harris can have you rooting for a cannibalistic serial killer.
The book reaches uncharted territory with graphic violence. It touches every evil known to man and then some...... murder, cannibalism, torture, child molestation, incest, bribery, corruption, greed............. these and more keep the reader spellbound to this nightmarish novel.
The book reads fast and holds interest right up until the shocking end. A magnificently macabre five star thriller!
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Biggest disappointment of the year

I've waited ten years for the sequel to The Silence of the Lambs; ten very patient years because I believed the longer the wait, the bigger the payoff. Wrong. If Thomas Harris spent the last ten years meticulously writing this latest installment, I'll eat my liver. Now hang on, I don't mean to say this is a bad novel, in fact it will make a tremendous movie. That's the problem...it read like a screenplay. The characters I grew to know in the last novel just didn't seem real enough and I didn't really feel anything about anyone. The writing seemed rushed, and as a whole rested on the laurels of Silence of the Lambs, of which there were many references. On the other hand, the story is pretty darn good. So this is a mixed review...great story, disappointing writing. To be frank, I first smelled trouble when the highest accolades came from Stephen King, whose endorsements I take with a truckload of salt. I recommend you read it, just don't set your hopes as high as I did and you'll enjoy a good story. And be sure you have an Italian-English dictionary on hand for those annoying non-translated passages.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Title For My Review

Well, I notice many people were disappointed with this...I was too immediately after finishing the book. It was great up until the end right? I agree with that. I thought Mason Verger himself was a stupid and predictable character. I've always felt sympathy for every other antagonist in Harris's books. But perhaps, Harris didn't want you to feel sorry for Mason. Harris has always shown both sides of the villian, so he very well could've done so here. Harris wanted your attention to be turned towards Hannibal. And it was. Now, about Clarice. Who says that she wasn't acting like herself? Guys, Clarice has always been running and hiding from her past, avoiding it. At the beginning of the book, with the somewhat impromptu letter from Lecter, her immediate instinct was to catch him. To redeem herself, possibly, to distract attention from her little Evelda Drumgo incident. Or maybe, despite Lecter's reassurance that he would not go after Starling, she had a little fear for her life. Lecter feels Starling can replace Mischa, and maybe Starling feels that Lecter is almost like her father. Starling realizes that Lecter and herself need each other, they need each other's comfort, she realizes that with Lecter, she can stop running. In "Silence", the lambs were a metaphor for Catherine, but were they also a metaphor for Clarice? Was Clarice's past a lamb? Clarice's lamb was slaughtered, and, depending on your religious beliefs, the lamb's soul may have gone on to where it wanted to be. Like someone below said, this is the death of Clarice as we know her, she is moving on to where she wants to be. Clarice never needed the FBI. She needed Lecter. So, after you've let the ending sink in, you realize that Starling didn't stop acting like herself, because she was just starting to. I thought the ravenous pigs, the eel, the little feast at the end, were all very stupid things. I thought Mason was a very stupid character. The plot here was not about Mason wanting to kill Lecter as much as it was about the relationship between Clarice and Hannibal. How Clarice learned to stop running, and how Clarice learned to let go of her lamb. As for a sequel, the closing line says it all in my opinion. "We can only learn so much and live."
Movieboy
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Oh dear...

One of the most ridiculously stupid novels I have ever had the misfortune to have read. The plot defies belief, the characters are thin, plywood cut-outs and the resolution is silly enough to make you wonder if Thomas Harris went insane while writing it. I mean, I actually thought I was losing my mind as I ploughed through the last fifty pages. I nearly checked myself into the nearest psychiatric hospital, complaining of hallucinations and imagined story lines that made no coherent sense.
I can only conclude that Thomas Harris wrote this lousy, terrible book for the massive crates of money currently being shipped over to his house. The only benefit that may come out of it (for the rest of us, that is, not Mr Harris) is that De Laurentis might actually turn it into a film. If he does then go and buy a ticket, I really implore you. You may never get the chance to see something this funny ever again.
("More brain, Clarice?"
"Only if you have one of the pigs bring it over.")
Definitely, absolutely enough said.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An insult to the reader

I have read all three of Harri's previous books and enjoyed them all. They have good, believable plots with tight character portrayal and are genuinley frightening. Good stuff. Then along came this book Hannibal. What a pathetic waste of time. I got my paperback copy free and even then I feel ripped off. I won't bore you with a plot summary because this book doesn't deserve it. Reading it,I had a gradually increasing suspicion that the author had lost the plot and the final 60 pages or so where the author goes into fantasy land confirmed it. Why Harris has written such a poor novel I will never know. The problems are numerous. They start with poor character portrayal. We never get a clear picture of Clarice Starling (and it gets totally fuzzy at the end). Hannibal becomes a sort of gourmet fairy godfather. Krendler is a cardboard cut out. And so on. It gets worse. Add to that a rather weak plot. Pad it out with long pretentious descriptions of Italian scenery and lots of vague airy fairy analyses of mental processes. Add in some unbelievable plot developments and a totally laughable ending and you've got one major disappointment on your hands. Presumably Harris was trying to impress us all with his "literary style". If so, he failed dismally. Even the explicit gory scenes fail to thrill simply because they are so unreal and so obviously contrived. I would give this pathetic book a single star for keeping me reading to the end. I shouldn't have bothered. How did Stephen King et al give this piece of rubbish such high reviews? Can you ever take a reviewer like King seriously again. My advice is give this loser a miss.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Exquisitely frightening

I loved the book. Of the three, Hannibal is my favorite. Why? Because in the book we are finally told the reason for Hannibal's predatory facet and the reason is plauseable. Hannibal graduates from being just a one-sided psychotic killer to a dramatically complex monster who can charm and horrify in the same instant. Harris fleshes out Starling's character too--she is now older and more jaded than when we saw her last. The FBI has not been kind to her and her 15 minutes of fame from Jame Gumb is long gone. She relies on her wits and her inner strength to survive a bureau that eats its own.
The controversial ending will cause many readers some heartburn, but you have to look deeply into Starling's character to understand it. Starling has been fighting her father's memory, fighting her poor Southern upbringing, fighting for respect and for her life in a job that is so deeply entrenched as "men's work." And the battle is never won. In the end, Hannibal offers Starling the peace of forgetting, the peace of never fighting ever again. It is an allogorical finale. Starling can wake up if she wants to, but when we leave her at the opera house in those final pages, she is sound asleep. But she is smiling as she sleeps.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Mr. Harris Should Be Ashamed of Himself

This is not a sequel to "Silence," it is a crude joke. He's taken Starling and regressed her instead of building on her character. She speaks in Catskill twang through most of the book. Lecter is now one of these bad guys who only kills really bad people, or people trying to steal his wallet. Or people trying to catch him. Whatever happened to devouring census takers? He's not truly bad, now, in fact, the reader gets a cuddly personal history of Lecter which explains why he became so bad, darnit! It wasn't his fault! Some bad guys did bad things, and made Lecter bad! Mommy! I'm bad now! A misfire on every conceivable level, staring with the first chapter. So disappointing...so sad. Lecter is almost superhuman, does this guy work out or what? The ending will leave your mouth agape. Agape at the horror of what Harris could have been possibly thinking when he scribbled this missive on paper. Abominable
10 people found this helpful