Getting Well Again: The Bestselling Classic About the Simontons' Revolutionary Lifesaving Self- Awareness Techniques
Getting Well Again: The Bestselling Classic About the Simontons' Revolutionary Lifesaving Self- Awareness Techniques book cover

Getting Well Again: The Bestselling Classic About the Simontons' Revolutionary Lifesaving Self- Awareness Techniques

Mass Market Paperback – April 1, 1992

Price
$8.99
Publisher
Bantam
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0553280333
Dimensions
4.16 x 0.73 x 6.82 inches
Weight
5.4 ounces

Description

From the Publisher Based on the Simontons' experience with hundreds of patients at their world-famous Cancer Counseling and Research Center, Getting Well Again introduces the scientific basis for the "will to live." In this revolutionary book the Simontons profile the typical "cancer personality": how an individual's reactions to stress and other emotional factors can contribute to the onset and progress of cancer -- and how positive expectations, self-awareness, and self-care can contribute to survival. This book offers the same self-help techniques the Simonton's patients have used to successfully to reinforce usual medical treatment -- techniques for learning positive attitudes, relaxation, visualization, goal setting, managing pain, exercise, and building an emotional support system. From the Inside Flap Based on the Simontons' experience with hundreds of patients at their world-famous Cancer Counseling and Research Center, Getting Well Again introduces the scientific basis for the "will to live."In this revolutionary book the Simontons profile the typical "cancer personality": how an individual's reactions to stress and other emotional factors can contribute to the onset and progress of cancer -- and how positive expectations, self-awareness, and self-care can contribute to survival. This book offers the same self-help techniques the Simonton's patients have used to successfully to reinforce usual medical treatment -- techniques for learning positive attitudes, relaxation, visualization, goal setting, managing pain, exercise, and building an emotional support system. Based on the Simontons' experience with hundreds of patients at their world-famous Cancer Counseling and Research Center, "Getting Well Again introduces the scientific basis for the "will to live." In this revolutionary book the Simontons profile the typical "cancer personality": how an individual's reactions to stress and other emotional factors can contribute to the onset and progress of cancer -- and how positive expectations, self-awareness, and self-care can contribute to survival. This book offers the same self-help techniques the Simonton's patients have used to successfully to reinforce usual medical treatment -- techniques for learning positive attitudes, relaxation, visualization, goal setting, managing pain, exercise, and building an emotional support system. O. Carl Simonton, MD, (1942–2009) was a radiation oncologist and founder and director of the Simonton Cancer Center in Malibu, California, the first cancer counseling program to recognize the role and importance of family and personal support and to include them in the treatment plan. Dr. Simonton was a frequen lecturer at hospitals and medical schools, a consultant for cancer counseling programs, and the author of numberous articles for professional publications. James Creighton, PhD, is a psychotherapist and coauthor of Getting Well Again , withxa0O. Carl Simonton, MD, andxa0Stephanie Matthews Simonton. Stephanie Matthews Simonton is a psychotherapist. She is the co-author of Getting Well Again and the author of The Healing Family. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1 xa0 The Mind-Body Connection: A Psychological Approach to Cancer Treatment xa0 Everyone participates in his or her health or illness at all times. xa0 This book will show people with cancer or other serious illnesses how they can participate in getting well again. It will also show those who are not ill how they can participate in maintaining their health. xa0 We use the word participate to indicate the vital role you play in creating your own level of health. Most of us assume that healing is something done to us, that if we have a medical problem our responsibility is simply to get to a physician who will then heal us. That’s true to a degree, but it is only part of the story. xa0 We all participate in our own health through our beliefs, our feelings, and our attitudes toward life, as well as in more direct ways, such as through exercise and diet. In addition, our response to medical treatment is influenced by our beliefs about the effectiveness of the treatment and by the confidence we have in the medical team. xa0 This book in no way minimizes the role of the physician and other health professionals engaged in medical treatment. Rather, Getting Well Again will describe what you can do in conjunction with medical treatment to gain the health you deserve. xa0 Understanding how much you can participate in your health or illness is a significant first step for everyone in getting well. For many of our patients it is the critically important step. It may well be for you, too. xa0 We are Carl and Stephanie Simonton, and we operate the Cancer Counseling and Research Center in Dallas, Texas. Carl, the medical director of the center, is a radiation oncologist, a physician specializing in the treatment of cancer. Stephanie is director of counseling and is trained in psychology. xa0 Most of our patients, who come to us from all over the country, have received a “medically incurable” diagnosis from their doctors. According to national cancer statistics, they have an average life expectancy of one year. When these people believe that only medical treatment can help them—but their physicians have said that medicine is no longer of much avail and that they probably have only a few months to live—they feel doomed, trapped, helpless, and usually fulfill the doctors’ expectations. But if patients mobilize their own resources and actively participate in their recovery, they may well exceed their life expectancy and significantly alter the quality of life. xa0 The ideas and techniques described in this book are the approach we employ at our Cancer Counseling and Research Center to show cancer patients how they can participate in getting well again and live a rewarding and fulfilling life. xa0 THE STARTING POINT: THE “WILL TO LIVE” xa0 Why do some patients recover their health and others die, when the diagnosis is the same for both? Carl became interested in this problem while he was completing his residency as a cancer specialist at the University of Oregon Medical School. There he noticed that patients who stated they wanted to live would often act as if they did not. There were lung cancer patients who refused to stop smoking, liver cancer patients who wouldn’t cut down on alcohol, and others who wouldn’t show up for treatment regularly. xa0 In many cases, these were people whose medical prognosis indicated that, with treatment, they could look forward to many more years of life. Yet while they affirmed again and again that they had countless reasons to live, these patients showed a greater apathy, depression, and attitude of giving up than did a number of others diagnosed with terminal disease. xa0 In the latter category was a small group of patients who had been sent home after minimal treatment, with little expectation that they would live to see their first follow-up appointment. Yet several years later, they were still arriving for their annual or semiannual examinations, remaining in quite good health, and inexplicably beating the statistics. xa0 When Carl asked them to account for their good health they would frequently give such answers as, “I can’t die until my son graduates from college,” or “They need me too much at work,” or “I won’t die until I’ve solved the problem with my daughter.” The common thread running through these replies was the belief that they exerted some influence over the course of their disease. The essential difference between these patients and those who would not cooperate was in their attitude toward their disease and their positive stance toward life. The patients who continued to do well, for one reason or another, had a stronger “will to live.” This discovery fascinated us. xa0 Stephanie, whose background was in motivational counseling, had an interest in unusual achievers—those people who in business seemed destined to go to the top. She had studied the behavior of exceptional performers and had taught the principles of that behavior to average achievers. It seemed reasonable to study cancer patients in the same way—to learn what those who were doing well had in common, and how they differed from those who were doing poorly. xa0 If the difference between the patient who regains his health and the one who does not is in part a matter of attitude toward the disease and belief that he could somehow influence it, then, we wondered, how could we influence patients’ beliefs in that positive direction? Might we be able to apply techniques from motivational psychology to induce and enhance a “will to live”? Beginning in 1969, we began looking at all the possibilities, exploring such diverse psychological techniques as encounter groups, group therapy, meditation, mental imagery, positive thinking, motivational techniques, “mind development” courses like Silva Mind Control and Mind Dynamics, and biofeedback. xa0 From our study of biofeedback, we learned that certain techniques were enabling people to influence their own internal body processes, such as heart rate and blood pressure. An important aspect of biofeedback, called visual imagery, was also a principal component of other techniques we had studied. The more we learned about the process, the more intrigued we became. xa0 Essentially, the visual imagery process involved a period of relaxation, during which the patient would mentally picture a desired goal or result. With the cancer patient, this would mean his attempting to visualize the cancer, the treatment destroying it and, most importantly, his body’s natural defenses helping him recover. After discussion with two leading biofeedback researchers, Drs. Joe Kamiya and Elmer Green, of the Menninger Clinic, we decided to use visual imagery techniques with cancer patients. xa0 THE FIRST PATIENT: A DRAMATIC EXAMPLE xa0 The first patient with whom an attempt was made to apply our developing theories was a sixty-one-year-old man who came to the medical school in 1971 with a form of throat cancer that carried a grave prognosis. He was very weak, his weight had dropped from 130 to 98 pounds, he could barely swallow his own saliva, and was having difficulty breathing. There was less than a 5 percent chance that he would survive five years. Indeed, the medical school doctors had seriously debated whether to treat him at all, since it was distinctly possible that therapy would only make him more miserable without significantly diminishing his cancer. xa0 Carl went into the examining room determined to help this man actively participate in his treatment. This was a case that justified using exceptional measures. Carl began treating the patient by explaining how the patient himself could influence the course of his own disease. Carl then outlined a program of relaxation and mental imagery based on the research we had been accumulating. The man was to set aside three, five-to-fifteen-minute periods during the day—in the morning on arising, at noon after lunch, and at night before going to bed. During these periods he was first to compose himself by sitting quietly and concentrating on the muscles of his body, starting with his head and going all the way to his feet, telling each muscle group to relax. Then, in this more relaxed state, he was to picture himself in a pleasant, quiet place—sitting under a tree, by a creek, or anywhere that suited his fancy, so long as it was pleasurable. Following this he was to imagine his cancer vividly in whatever form it seemed to take. xa0 Next, Carl asked him to picture his treatment, radiation therapy, as consisting of millions of tiny bullets of energy that would hit all the cells, both normal and cancerous, in their path. Because the cancer cells were weaker and more confused than the normal cells, they would not be able to repair the damage, Carl suggested, and so the normal cells would remain healthy while the cancer cells would die. xa0 Carl then asked the patient to form a mental picture of the last and most important step—his body’s white blood cells coming in, swarming over the cancer cells, picking up and carrying off the dead and dying ones, flushing them out of his body through his liver and kidneys. In his mind’s eye he was to visualize his cancer decreasing in size and his health returning to normal. After he completed each such exercise, he was to go about whatever he had to do the rest of the day. xa0 What happened was beyond any of Carl’s previous experience in treating cancer patients with purely physical intervention. The radiation therapy worked exceptionally well, and the man showed almost no negative reaction to the radiation on his skin or in the mucous membranes in his mouth and throat. Halfway through treatment he was able to eat again. He gained strength and weight. The cancer progressively disappeared. xa0 During the course of treatment—both the radiation therapy and the mental imagery—the patient reported missing only one mental imagery session on a day when he went for a drive with a friend and was caught in a traffic jam. He was most upset, both with himself and with his friend, for in missing just that one session he felt his control over his condition was slipping away. xa0 Treating this patient in this way was very exciting, but it was also somewhat frightening. The possibilities for methods of healing that seemed to be opening up before us went beyond anything that Carl’s formal medical education had prepared him for. xa0 The patient continued to progress until finally, two months later, he showed no signs of cancer. The strength of his conviction that he could influence the course of his own illness was evident when, close to the end of his treatment, he said to Car): “Doctor, in the beginning I needed you in order to get well. Now I think you could disappear and I could still make it on my own.” Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Based on the Simontons' experience with hundreds of patients at their world-famous Cancer Counseling and Research Center,
  • Getting Well Again
  • introduces the scientific basis for the "will to live."In this revolutionary book the Simontons profile the typical "cancer personality": how an individual's reactions to stress and other emotional factors can contribute to the onset and progress of cancer -- and how positive expectations, self-awareness, and self-care can contribute to survival. This book offers the same self-help techniques the Simonton's patients have used to successfully to reinforce usual medical treatment -- techniques for learning positive attitudes, relaxation, visualization, goal setting, managing pain, exercise, and building an emotional support system.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(169)
★★★★
25%
(71)
★★★
15%
(42)
★★
7%
(20)
-7%
(-20)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

A pioneering work in mind-body interaction in cancer treatment

When this book was first published, a co-worker's wife was diagnosed with terminal, metastasized cancer. I gave them this book and she took to it like that proverbial duck to water. She found a psychologist who was familiar with Dr. Simonton's work and he assisted her. Couple of months later, the co-worker came to me and said: "Sarah (not the real name) is well. The doctors did a CAT scan on her and all that they can see is scar tissue where the tumors were." For many, this will be very difficult to believe but there is nothing like personal experience. As Shakespeare said: "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than there are in all of your philosophies." There is a follow-up to this but not enough room to elaborate.
29 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Simonton's Admirable Journey

I first heard about the Simontons in the book 'The Turning Point (1987)' by Fritjof Capra: a couple of doctors who went out to coin an alternative therapy for cancer back in the 1970s. They had a lot of courage. They did not fear to lose their reputation while they were doing things that were not quite tolerated, at that time, by the medical establishment.

Dr. Otto Carl Simonton (1942-2009) and his wife Dr. Stephanie Matthews-Simonton criticized the usual ways of treating cancer.
Their account of an alternative cancer cure which became successful is written in an honest and lively manner, not theory-based but sanely experience-based.

I think that the Simontons have greatly helped to establish alternative cancer cure in our today’s diversified medical servicing, and thereby have done a great job for all of us. And yet, I have met so many people, even in recent years, who never heard of its existence! It seems that the common man and the common woman get their knowledge from the mass media, and there you see same old soup, even today, with death-blow doctoral injunctions of the kind ‘Your life expectancy is maximum six months’, chemotherapy, and all the rest of it. And of course, you can find the Simontons on the Internet. Here is the address of the place and the reference to their well-done web site about the Simonton Cancer Center.

That’s what conditioning is all about, and how the medical system works—systematic disinformation about everything, life, people, the world, resources, disease, hunger, war, death—while health is never mentioned! And for good reason. It could disturb worldwide medical business, for that’s what it is: a business, not something even remotely concerned with healing.

Fritjof Capra mentions in his book 'The Turning Point (1987)' that he was astonished to find out that the words healing and healer have a pejorative meaning for most medical doctors. In fact, these terms are associated with charlatanism and quackery. That is why, among other things, the Simontons did not have an easy job. Their breakthrough were techniques today called ‘self-awareness techniques’ that at the time when they started where called visualization techniques or mental imaging. It was one of several approaches they had tried out, but as these techniques were more successful than others in helping their cancer patients, they stuck with them. (By the way, there are many other alternative cancer cures; some are based on diet, some on bioenergetic treatment, some on ozone inhalation, etc.).

The most important thing in the process of helping the patient to collaborate in healing their cancer is to get them to learn that they have a role to play in their healing. For they are conditioned by traditional medicine to be mere injunction-receivers, and passive sufferers of a fate. The authors write:
—Most of our patients, who come to us from all over the country, have received a ‘medically incurable’ diagnosis from their doctors. According to national cancer statistics, they have an average life expectancy of one year. When these people believe that only medical treatment can help them—but their physicians have said that medicine is no longer of much avail and that they probably have only a few months to live—they feel doomed, trapped, helpless, and usually fulfill the doctor’s expectations. But if patients mobilize their own resources and actively participate in their recovery, they may well exceed their life expectancy and significantly alter the quality of life./4

One of the most daring ideas that doctors ever came up with was to offer patients placebo drugs, suggesting they got drug XYZ, famous and tested, and proven to be effective according to pharmaceutical publicity. In truth, what they received was a sugar pill. Well, it’s hard to believe that this works better than normal medicine because it has no side effects. But it has been shown over and over that it cures as effectively as a real drug. The authors relate a dramatic case that vividly illustrates the power of the placebo effect.

Now regarding the much debated question what causes cancer, the authors review in the book the following etiologies: carcinogenic substances, genetic predisposition, radiation, diet and the immune system.

Regarding carcinogenic substances, the authors note that there is no simple cause--effect relationship between harmful substances, chemicals, chronic irritants, and cancer, and that the matter is rather controversial in the literature.

Regarding genetic predisposition, the authors note that a human-based research was not yet available, the research being available having been conducted on mice. They concluded that this research left considerable doubt on any ‘it’s genetics alone’ theory.

Regarding radiation, the authors note that background radiation, also called cosmic radiation, is too universal a cause to possibly contribute to the cancer etiology.

With regard to another possibility being discussed, as to fluorocarbons released from aerosol cans that destroy the ozone layer of the atmosphere, leading to an increased exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the sun, the authors admit that although this could certainly lead to potential health problems, high levels of ultraviolet rays were associated only with skin cancer.
Regarding x-rays and other radiation used in medical diagnosis and treatment, the evidence was still unclear because many people who have been exposed to high levels of x-rays and other radiation do not contract cancer.

Regarding diet as a possible cause of cancer, which is a relatively recent etiology, the authors note the following quite remarkable details:
—For instance, Japan, where the diet is still predominantly based on fish and rice and contains substantially less fat than does the American or European diet, has both a lower / incidence of cancer and a substantially different profile in types of cancers than the other industrialized countries. Since the incidence of cancer goes up sharply among Japanese living in the United States ... some researchers have settled on differences in diet as a likely explanation./38-39

The authors argue that for understanding cancer, we need to find out why some people have a stronger immune system than others?

As problems with organ transplantation showed, the body’s immune system normally is strong. For example, a cancer-affected organ would not be accepted by the receiver, and if forced to do so, as was shown by experiments, the receiver would indeed contract the cancer, but as soon as the organ was again removed, the cancer would quickly disappear. This research, as the authors conclude, has led to a broad medical acceptance of what is called the ‘surveillance theory’ of cancer development.
Now, the answer is of course, that the real causes of cancer are related to emotional stress, in the sense that the suppression of emotions, or certain emotions, clearly contributes to the causation of cancer. Another factor is the inability noted in most cancer patients to express their emotions and thus release themselves at times from pent-up emotional tension.

For example in a research done by Dr. Thomas A. Holmes and associates at the University of Washington School of Medicine, a scale was designed that assigned numerical values (1-100) to certain stressful events: ‘Death of Spouse’, is rated 100, followed by ‘Divorce’, with 73 and ‘Marital Separation’ with 65. However, even in Holmes’ study, 51 percent of the individuals with scores of 300 did not get sick during the period of the study, which let the authors conclude that an event, even a stressful one, is construed differently from person to person. A decisive study done in the 1920s by Dr. Hans Selye at the University of Prague gave conclusive evidence for the stress-related etiology:
—This evidence clearly demonstrates the very real physical effects of stress. But it is still another effect that is of greatest importance to the cancer patient. Selye has discovered that chronic stress suppresses the immune system which is responsible for engulfing and destroying cancerous cells or alien microorganisms. The important point is this: The physical conditions Selye describes as being produced by stress are virtually identical to those under which an abnormal cell could reproduce and spread into a dangerous cancer. Not surprisingly, cancer patients frequently have weakened immune systems. /53

Selye’s findings were confirmed by other research and it was found that, for example, lymphocyte function, a critical measure of the potency of the body’s immune system, ‘was significantly depressed in those who had lost a wife or husband.’ (53) Another study the authors report points to mental factors leading to the suppression of the immune system where it was demonstrated ‘that the body’s immunity to tuberculosis can be profoundly affected by hypnotic suggestion,’ which leads to the conclusion that mental and emotional stress impacts on the body’s defenses.

But this is not yet the core of the book. The authors went further in their research and found historical connections between cancer and emotions, and that certain beliefs clearly trigger a predisposition for cancer: it is not down the road that we got stress, but how we cope with it what really is the subtle cause of cancer.

I always intuitively knew that compulsory morality is a strong factor in the etiology of cancer, and the cancer patients I met in my life have corroborated this insight. They were invariably people who were thinking much more on the lines of ‘should be’ and ‘ought to behave’ than the average citizen who tends to think on the lines of ‘Me first’. Quoting a researcher who published a book in 1893 with the title Cancer and the Cancer-Process, and who stated that ‘idiots and lunatics are remarkably exempt from cancer in every shape’, the authors go on to examine an array of research findings that corroborated their hypothesis of ‘emotional causation’. Among the factors that cause predisposition for cancer, the authors examine the research of Dr. Lawrence LeShan, an experimental psychologist who found evidence that co-dependence and emotional abuse may contribute to the cancer etiology. He identified four recurring elements, something like a fatally coincidental sequence, in the life stories of more than 500 cancer patients.

I have scribbled at the edge of page 63 of the book, in big and angry letters: ‘Cancer is a Western plague. These people never had the freedom to express their emotions, and they never developed their real self. This is the real cause of cancer!’

After reviewing some of their patient’s life stories, the authors inquire into the psychological process of illness and come to stress certain factors they have seen in all the life stories they reviewed, such as, for example:

—Experiences in childhood result in decisions to be a certain kind of person.
—The individual is rocked by a cluster of stressful life events.
—These stresses create a problem with which the individual does not know how to deal.
—The individual sees no way of changing the rules about how he or she must act and so feels trapped and helpless to resolve the problem. /
—The individual puts distance between himself or herself and the problem, becoming static, unchanging, rigid./74-75

For each of these categories, the authors forward conclusive evidence from the case histories, which I will not discuss here because of copyright. I can only say that this part of the book is perhaps the most important as it provides very concise evidence as to the real causes of cancer, which can be summarized as being emotional, behavioral, and belief-related. But this is not all there is in the etiology of cancer. The authors also provide conclusive evidence for the fact that also the expectations a patient fosters about cancer as a disease contribute to the etiology, and that there is evidence for the fact that the stiff neurotic adherence to a life-denying ideology or religion or otherwise morality-imposing belief system decidedly contributes to the causation of cancer.

After this first research part of the book, the authors present their own approach in the second part, that starts at page 100, and thus approximately after one-third of the book. I find that this was a good balance to keep by the authors, and congratulate them, and their publisher, for the good editing and composition of this booklet, which comes with a 19-pages Bibliography and an Index.
24 people found this helpful