Fifty Degrees Below
Fifty Degrees Below book cover

Fifty Degrees Below

Hardcover – October 25, 2005

Price
$14.26
Format
Hardcover
Pages
416
Publisher
Spectra
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0553803129
Dimensions
6.43 x 1.31 x 9.53 inches
Weight
1.55 pounds

Description

From Publishers Weekly Starred Review. Earth continues its relentless plunge toward environmental collapse in Robinson's well-done if intensely didactic follow-up to Forty Signs of Rain (2004). As a result of global warming, the Gulf Stream has stalled, and when winter comes, impossibly frigid temperatures hit the Eastern Seaboard and Western Europe. As people starve, multinational corporations explore ways of making a profit from the disaster. When Antarctica's ice shelves collapse, low-lying island nations quite literally slip beneath the rising waters. In Washington, D.C., clear-sighted scientists must overcome government inertia and stupidity to put into effect policies that may begin to salvage the situation. An enormous fleet of ships is dispatched to the North Atlantic to dump millions of tons of salt into the ocean in the hope of restarting the Gulf Stream. This ecological disaster tale is guaranteed to anger political and economic conservatives of every stripe, but it provides perhaps the most realistic portrayal ever created of the environmental changes that are already occurring on our planet. It should be required reading for anyone concerned about our world's future. Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From School Library Journal Adult/High School–Picking up where Forty Signs of Rain (Bantam, 2004) leaves off, this second book in a planned trilogy finds Earth about to experience the most intense winter on record. Governments worldwide blithely go about their routines in spite of the monumental recent flooding in Washington, DC, and other areas around the globe. When the record-setting cold sets in, people begin freezing to death and starving due to crop failures. Large corporations and world governments use the crisis to attempt to rig elections and plan other agendas to tighten their hold on the public. Meanwhile scientists, especially those at the National Science Foundation, frantically search for a way to shift the weather patterns. The answer seems to be to jump-start the Gulf Stream to get it flowing again; the world watches as millions of tons of salt pour from ships into the ocean in this attempt. While the major plot of ecological chaos plays out, the subplots show how the effects of the weather changes, ecological turmoil, and governmental and big business assaults affect the various characters as they try to survive. This well-researched and expertly written novel about a future that might be coming true all too soon will hopefully serve as a wake-up call about Earths current serious situation. –Pam Johnson, Fairfax County Public Library, VA Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Bookmarks Magazine Robinson, award-winning author of the Mars trilogy, turns his attention away from space and toward Earth. Critics werenx92t too sure what to make of the second of this eco-thriller series. If it was a plea to take action to combat global warming, few were certain that Robinson saw "big science" as the obvious answer and suspected that he had something else up his sleeve for the third book. But readers wonx92t miss the obvious point about global warming, government, technology, and sciencex97though a moralizing air, out-of-context details, and distracting subplots raised some criticsx92 eyebrows. The London Times even warned that this novel was "nigh on unintelligible" unless youx92d read the first book. Since Robinsonx92s scenario really could happen, youx92d better read up. Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc. "Fifty Degrees Below should be required reading for anyone concerned about our world's future.... it provides perhaps the most realistic portrayal ever created of the environmental changes that are already occurring on our planet."— Publishers Weekly , starred review"Fast-paced and exciting.... First-rate ecological speculation."— Kirkus Reviews "Could give Michael Crichton a run for his money.... should be required reading for government officials and voters."— St. Louis Post-Dispatch KIM STANLEY ROBINSON is a winner of the Hugo, Nebula, and Locus Awards. He is the author of ten previous books, including the bestselling Mars trilogy and the critically acclaimed Forty Signs of Rain , The Years of Rice and Salt , and Antarctica –for which he was sent to the Antarctic by the U.S. National Science Foundation as part of their Antarctic Artists and Writers' Program. He lives in Davis, California. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. I PRIMATE in FOREST Nobody likes Washington D.C. Even the people who love it don’t like it. Climate atrocious, traffic worse: an ordinary midsized gridlocked American city, in which the plump white federal buildings make no real difference. Or rather they bring all the politicians and tourists, the lobbyists and diplomats and refugees and all the others who come from somewhere else, often for suspect reasons, and thereafter spend their time clogging the streets and hogging the show, talking endlessly about their nonexistent city on a hill while ignoring the actual city they are in. The bad taste of all that hypocrisy can’t be washed away even by the food and drink of a million very fine restaurants. No—bastion of the world government, locked vault of the World Bank, fortress headquarters of the world police; Rome, in the age of bread and circuses—no one can like that. So naturally when the great flood washed over the city, wreaking havoc and leaving the capital spluttering in the livid heat of a wet and bedraggled May, the stated reactions were varied, but the underlying subtext often went something like this: HA HA HA. For there were many people around the world who felt that justice had somehow been served. Capital of the world, thoroughly trashed: who wouldn’t love it? Of course the usual things were said by the usual parties. Disaster area, emergency relief, danger of epidemic, immediate restoration, pride of the nation, etc. Indeed, as capital of the world, the president was firm in his insistence that it was everyone’s patriotic duty to support rebuilding, demonstrating a brave and stalwart response to what he called “this act of climactic terrorism.” “From now on,” the president continued, “we are at a state of war with nature. We will work until we have made this city even more like it was than before.” But truth to tell, ever since the Reagan era the conservative (or dominant) wing of the Republican party had been coming to Washington explicitly to destroy the federal government. They had talked about “starving the beast,” but flooding would be fine if it came to that; they were flexible, it was results that counted. And how could the federal government continue to burden ordinary Americans when its center of operations was devastated? Why, it would have to struggle just to get back to normal! Obviously the flood was a punishment for daring to tax income and pretending to be a secular nation. One couldn’t help thinking of Sodom and Gomorrah, the prophecies specified in the Book of Revelation, and so on. Meanwhile, those on the opposite end of the political spectrum likewise did not shed very many tears over the disaster. As a blow to the heart of the galactic imperium it was a hard thing to regret. It might impede the ruling caste for a while, might make them acknowledge, perhaps, that their economic system had changed the climate, and that this was only the first of many catastrophic consequences. If Washington was denied now that it was begging for help, that was only what it had always done to its environmental victims in the past. Nature bats last—poetic justice—level playing field—reap what you sow—rich arrogant bastards—and so on. Thus the flood brought pleasure to both sides of the aisle. And in the days that followed Congress made it clear in their votes, if not in their words, that they were not going to appropriate anything like the amount of money it would take to clean up the mess. They said it had to be done; they ordered it done; but they did not fund it. The city therefore had to pin its hopes on either the beggared District of Columbia, which already knew all there was to know about unfunded mandates from Congress, to the extent that for years their license plates had proclaimed “Taxation Without Representation”; or on the federal agencies specifically charged with disaster relief, like FEMA and the Army Corps of Engineers and others that could be expected to help in their ordinary course of their missions (and budgets). Experts from these agencies tried to explain that the flood did not have a moral meaning, that it was merely a practical problem in city management, which had to be solved as a simple matter of public health, safety, and convenience. The Potomac had ballooned into a temporary lake of about a thousand square miles; it had lasted no more than a week, but in that time inflicted great damage to the infrastructure. Much of the public part of the city was trashed. Rock Creek had torn out its banks, and the Mall was covered by mud; the Tidal Basin was now part of the river again, with the Jefferson Memorial standing in the shallows of the current. Many streets were blocked with debris; worse, in transport terms, many Metro tunnels had flooded, and would take months to repair. Alexandria was wrecked. Most of the region’s bridges were knocked out or suspect. The power grid was uncertain, the sewage system likewise; epidemic disease was a distinct possibility. Given all this, certain repairs simply had to be made, and many were the calls for full restoration. But whether these calls were greeted with genuine agreement, Tartuffian assent, stony indifference, or gloating opposition, the result was the same: not enough money was appropriated to complete the job. Only the essentials were dealt with. Necessary infrastructure, sure, almost; and of course the nationally famous buildings were cleaned up, the Mall replanted with grass and new cherry trees; the Vietnam Memorial excavated, the Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials recaptured from their island state. Congress debated a proposal to leave the highwater mark of greenish mud on the sides of the Washington Monument, as a flood-height record and a reminder of what could happen. But few wanted such a reminder, and in the end they rejected the idea. The stone of the great plinth was steam-cleaned, and around it the Mall began to look as if the flood had never happened. Elsewhere in the city, however. . . . It was not a good time to have to look for a place to live. And yet this was just what Frank Vanderwal had to do. He had leased his apartment for a year, covering the time he had planned to work for the National Science Foundation; then he had agreed to stay on. Now, only a month after the flood, his apartment had to be turned over to its owner, a State Department foreign-service person he had never met, returning from a stint in Brazil. So he had to find someplace else. No doubt the decision to stay had been a really bad idea. This thought had weighed on him as he searched for a new apartment, and as a result he had not persevered as diligently as he ought to have. Very little was available in any case, and everything on offer was prohibitively expensive. Thousands of people had been drawn to D.C. by a flood that had also destroyed thousands of residences, and damaged thousands more beyond immediate repair and reoccupation. It was a real seller’s market, and rents shot up accordingly. Many of the places Frank had looked at were also physically repulsive in the extreme, including some that had been flooded and not entirely cleaned up: the bottom of the barrel, still coated with sludge. The low point in this regard came in one semibasement hole in Alexandria, a tiny dark place barred for safety at the door and the single high window, so that it looked like a prison for troglodytes; and two thousand a month. After that Frank’s will to hunt was gone. Now the day of reckoning had come. He had cleared out and cleaned up, the owner was due home that night, and Frank had nowhere to go. It was a strange sensation. He sat at the kitchen counter in the dusk, strewn with the various sections of the Post. The “Apartments for Rent” section was less than a column long, and Frank had learned enough of its code by now to know that it held nothing for him. More interesting had been an article in the day’s Metro section about Rock Creek Park. Officially closed due to severe flood damage, it was apparently too large for the overextended National Park Service to be able to enforce the edict. As a result the park had become something of a no-man’s land, “a return to wilderness,” as the article had put it. Frank surveyed the apartment. It held no more memories for him than a hotel room, as he had done nothing but sleep there. That was all he had needed out of a home, his life proper having been put on hold until his return to San Diego. Now, well . . . it was like some kind of premature resuscitation, on a voyage between the stars. Time to wake up, time to leave the deep freeze and find out where he was. He got up and went down to his car. Out to the Beltway to circle north and then east, past the elongated Mormon temple and the great overpass graffiti referencing it: go home dorothy! Get off on Wisconsin, drive in toward the city. There was no particular reason for him to visit this part of town. Of course the Quiblers lived over here, but that couldn’t be it. He kept thinking: Homeless person, homeless person. You are a homeless person. A song from Paul Simon’s Graceland came to him, the one where one of the South African groups kept singing, Homeless; homeless, Da da da, da da da da da da . . . something like, Midnight come, and then you wanna go home. Or maybe it was a Zulu phrase. Or maybe, as he seemed to hear now: Homeless; homeless; he go down to find another home. Something like that. He came to the intersection at the Bethesda Metro stop, and suddenly it occurred to him why he might be there. Of course—this was where he had met the woman in the elevator. They had gotten stuck together coming up fro... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Bestselling, award-winning, author Kim Stanley Robinson continues his groundbreaking trilogy of eco-thrillers–and propels us deeper into the awesome whirlwind of climatic change. Set in our nation’s capital, here is a chillingly realistic tale of people caught in the collision of science, technology, and the consequences of global warming–which could trigger another phenomenon: abrupt climate change, resulting in temperatures...When the storm got bad, scientist Frank Vanderwal was at work, formalizing his return to the National Science Foundation for another year. He’d left the building just in time to help sandbag at Arlington Cemetery. Now that the torrent was over, large chunks of San Diego had eroded into the sea, and D.C. was underwater. Shallow lakes occupied the most famous parts of the city. Reagan Airport was awash and the Potomac had spilled beyond its banks. Rescue boats dotted the saturated cityscape. Everything Frank and his colleagues in the halls of science and politics feared had culminated in this massive disaster. And now the world looked to them to fix it.Whatever Frank can do, now that he is homeless, he’ll have to do from his car. He’s not averse to sleeping outdoors. Years of research have made him hyperaware of his status as just another primate. That plus his encounter with a Tibetan Buddhist has left him resolved to live a more authentic life. Hopefully, this will prepare him for whatever is to come....For even as D.C. bails out from the flood, a more extreme climate change looms. With the melting of the polar ice caps shutting down the warm waters of the Gulf Stream, another Ice Age could be imminent. The last time it happened, eleven thousand years ago, it took just three years to start.Once again Kim Stanley Robinson uses his remarkable vision, trademark wry wit, and extraordinary insight into the complexity between man and nature to take us to the brink of disaster–and slightly beyond.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(91)
★★★★
25%
(76)
★★★
15%
(45)
★★
7%
(21)
23%
(69)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

better than the first installment

This is the second book in a trilogy, or perhaps the second part of a three book novel. (More on that later.) It works better for me than the first installment (Forty Signs Of Rain) because it is a lot more focused.

Where the first book followed a bunch of mostly-separated stories about a bunch of mostly-separated characters, this one concentrates on a single character, Frank Vanderwal. Some of the other characters from the first book are also covered in a secondary way, but Frank is the center of the story. (Leo is completely absent. Charlie and Anna are sometimes used as viewpoint characters, but quite sparingly.)

Some of the author's longtime fascination with Tibet shows up in a secondary storyline, but the major plot thread details Frank's attempt to live homeless in the middle of Washington DC as a "modern forest primate". This is complicated by a severe winter that is brought on by global climate change. It is contrasted by an examination of what happens when the zoo animals that were released during the flood of the previous book end up "going feral" and trying to survive in the now-wrecked Washington city parks.

Frank is also the focus of domestic surveillance operations, and Robinson presents an image (which is quite possibly true) of a society where domestic high tech spying is rampant and extends even to people who live "off grid" as much as possible. (The headlines in US papers this week are about the NSA performing illegal domestic spying, so perhaps this was a timely subject for fiction!)

He also discusses the idea of letting science replace politics as a method for keeping society running. Those familiar with Robinson's other works will recognize this idea. He likes to come up with new systems of economics and government, which he then uses as the background for a story about his characters. Many of these focus on "market failures" in the current capitalism/democracy system that is in place in the West. Climate change is a well-known market failure scenario, and fits in well with Robinson's political interests.

In the book, Charlie's boss Phil Chase decides to run for president against the unnamed but very Bush-like Republican incumbent. This is a small story in the book, but it is thematically important to the idea that "business as usual" just isn't working.

Frank also finds himself somewhat torn between a possible romantic involvement with his boss, Diane, and an on-going relationship with the mysterious woman he met while stuck in an elevator at the end of the first book.

The bottom line is that this book reads better than the first one. It has a focus, a more definite storyline, and a better feeling of completeness -- even though it is obviously not a complete novel.

Which brings me back to a complaint about this series and several other recent fiction series that I have read. When did it go out of fashion to publish complete novels? More and more it seems that novels have grown to the point that partial novels are being released as "parts of a series". That has its place in some stories, but in most of them (as in this one) it breaks up the story too much and weakens it overall. I think this "series" would have better if it had been a more tightly composed single book, about two thirds the length of the total trilogy.
46 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Suspense, It Burns!

I'm giving this only three stars, not for the writing, but for the serial nature of the two books so far in this trilogy.

Like the first book, this one has a lot to offer. Rapid climate change continues apace, and Robinson's scientists and politicians grapple with the effects as they work as involved professionals on the problem. Imagining Minnesotan winter temperatures in Washington DC is a powerful way to bring home how climate change could day-to-day life. The characters are touching and human, and their relationships with each other are as important as their relationship with the weather.

But for Pete's sake... the two books published so far aren't novels, they're the first two-thirds of a novel. They're not long enough nor dense enough to be satisfying as individual stories. The Mars trilogy, another trilogy by Robinson which followed a set of characters for three books, covered centuries of events in over two thousand pages; the first two books of this trilogy, by contrast, have the same page count as the last book of the Mars trilogy and span events over roughly a year, and even at that they seem a little padded with a lot of lunches and phone calls and searches for parking spaces. Worst of all, this book ends with another big 'To Be Continued...' placard.

It's praising with faint condemnation when a reader's principal frustration with book is that there isn't more of it, but still, be aware that whatever appetites were aroused by _Forty Signs of Rain_ won't be satisfied here. I remain optimistic about the end of the story, but I sure wish I didn't have to wait another year to read it.
25 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Intellectually stimulating story of abrupt climate change

This is the second in a proposed trilogy about abrupt climate change triggered by the melting of the polar caps and stalling of the gulfsteam. It is better than the first book in the series, in my opinion, because it follows one character, Frank VanderWal, to a greater extent. There are unrealistic, but nevertheless entertaining plot developments with Frank: hanging with homeless guys in a park (where he builds a treehouse), running with frisbee golf players regularly, running with his work colleagues at NSF over lunch (8-minute mile pace, talking shop the whole way), working out with his boss in the mornings at a work-out facility, rock-climbing with friends, volunteering with zoo friends to track and re-capture the animals released during the flood of the first book, sleeping in his treehouse or Odyssey van, and developing a relationship with a mystery woman who is stalked by her estranged/controlling/spy type of a husband. Not much time left for work. Mr. Robinson is obviously an athletically-oriented guy; if I wasn't also inclined in this way I would find this character almost too unrealistic to enjoy. But I ultimately liked the homeless and frisbee character plot add-ons so I overlooked the fact that Frank had about no time to do any of the *important work* he needed to be doing. Having said that, I like the information you get about global warming and about possible interventions. And there is a very interesting attempt to engage science in politics to a greater extent. The author states that President Nixon was responsible for pushing Science further to the periphery as an aid in policy decision-making. The Buddhist side story is interesting if you are attracted to Buddhist philosophy, but so far it is tangential to the main story. Mr. Robinson also re-vsiits the Prisoner's Dilemma, a social game theory that states that 'always defect' (compete against your neighbor) is the best strategy. He proposes that 'always generous' may actually be best under certain circumstances. One hopes this is true for the good of our longevity as planet stewards... A good, intellectully stimulating read; I guess we will see if it becomes prophetic or not. Great effort Mr. Robinson.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An "Eco-Thriller" That Doesn't Really Work

Global warming and other frightening environmental threats have launched a new genre of popular fiction called the "Eco Thriller." Bantam books is trying to cash in on this trend by publishing a series of novels by Kim Stanley Robinson, who is better known for his space fantasy / science fiction work.

Unfortunately, what Bantam forgot to do was assign a strong, experienced editor to Robinson. As much as I wanted this novel to succeed, it simply fails, devolving into a chaotic literary mess. The author can't seem to decide if his main topic is 1) Climate change, 2) Tibetan Buddhism, 3) Government surveillance, 4) Middle-Aged Romance, 5) Homelessness, 6) Zoology or 7) The political uses of science. Fans of the recent movie, "The Day After Tomorrow," will be very disappointed in this attempt.

"Fifty Degrees Below" focuses on a main character named Frank Vanderwal, who is an NSF researcher living in Washington, D,C., (actually in a city park tree house) following a major flood. He teams up with other scientists to propose large-scale solutions to the impending catastrophe driven by global warming. While some of the scientific ideas are interesting, they're embedded in a mishmash narrative that over-reaches the author's storytelling abilities by a country mile.

Michael Creighton tried something similar to this novel in his recent book, "State of Fear," but without the grandiose mix of pseudo-spirituality and philosophical bloviating. I'm sorry to be so harsh, but Robinson and Bantam have really disappointed me in this latest book. I won't read him again.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

On Bureaucracy

The second book in a trilogy on catastrophic global climate change. '50 Degrees' starts off where '40 Signs ' left off, Washington D.C. and much of the eastern seaboard has emerged from the deluge and clean-up ensues. This book, like its predecessor, is a book about bureaucracy and governmental infighting. Despite the writing on the wall the government and the NSF have a difficult time gaining any sort of traction on changing the status quo and leading the nation into reversing climate change and establishing some sort of carbon sequestration.

The character Frank plays the main protagonist in this book, he emerges from the deluge homeless and decides to go feral much like the Washington DC zoo animals had done during the rain storm. He lives in a tree house and tries to survive in the park even though temperatures are changing drastically after the thermohaline stall of the Gulf Stream. Much as the book suggests, temperatures reach 50 degrees below and many cities are woefully unprepared for it.

Much like the first book, this one spends the first 2/3rds taking us through the bureaucratic infighting between DoD and DoE versus the NSF and EPA amongst others. The last third involves the response to temperature change and the mini ice-age that looks imminent after the West Antarctic ice-shelf begins to separate. Along with this, Robinson tangentially discusses a secret governmental conspiracy to steal elections (a la Diebold) & warantless spying on Americans. This book is sure to make conservatives cringe and could be the anti 'State of Fear' Michael Chricton screed.

It's a fine book & Robinson is a very talented writer, I just wish he would focus less on the Tibetan obsession and stick to the weather. A good book, I plan on reading the final novel, but I think it could have been much better featuring more of the weather / governmental conspiracy angle.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Global Warming Cometh

I have gone back and forth on this review because I'm just not sure how I feel about this book. In "Forty Signs of Rain", I gave Robinson a lot of leeway in the slow progression of that novel. I believed that I understood what he was trying to say: That we are all going about our lives, almost blithely, as the effects of global warming start to catch up with us. That book flipped between the academic struggles to address global warming and the day-to-day realities of domestic life. Finally in the end, the gathered clouds unleash and we are off and running...

...And then in "Fifty Degrees Below" Robinson switches character emphasis and presents a new slow progression. There have been significant weather related events, but these are told as back-story--we do not get to go through them with the characters. But something is coming, and there are ominous portends in Siberia, tornadoes along the east coast of Canada, excessive rain in California, and drought just about everywhere else. Washington D.C. has been remade by an almost biblical flood, and most of the story takes place there. While the federal government does practically nothing to restore Washington D.C., Robinson's central character begins to adapt to the new reality, discovering primal urges within him that force him to cope. This is interesting characterization, but still small in the world of things.

The book just plods along. Winter in Washington D.C. gets really bad, but people manage to survive. The central character's efforts to help, both scientifically and culturally, are noble but seem like too little, too late--too small. And perhaps this is what Robinson is trying to say; if so I give him credit, but the vehicle for his message could still be more compelling. Suspending disbelief is difficult in a story in which the government won't even move to restore the nation's capitol (New Orleans?). And Robinson takes a lot of jibes at the Right (deservedly so), as if he were as disgusted as many of us by events since the 2004 election and felt compelled to air them out in this story.

So I believe, if I am interpreting Robinson's message correctly, that he is making some significant, profound observations about our fate as a species and as individuals, but the story moves along so slowly that I know many will not finish it. So how to rate this book? I'm just not sure.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I really wanted to like this book

With its theme of near future abrupt climate change, how could this book possibly fail? Unfortunately it does for the main reason that it spends far too much time on the exploits of the main character and less on the overall climatic catastrophe.

Fifty Degrees Below is the sequel to Forty Signs of Rain where Robinson introduced the climate scientists in the National Science Foundation who battle the inactivity of the Federal Government over climate change issues. This comes over as intensely frustrating and I'm sure it is. Forty Signs of Rain concludes with a catastrophic storm over Washington DC that floods out most of the city.

Fifty Degrees Below takes up the story after the flood. This time the theme is the shutdown of the gulf stream because of rapid melting of the Arctic Ice causing reduced salinity in the North Atlantic. This results in freezing winters in Europe and North America and climate scientists must find a solution, one being the dumping of massive amounts of salt in the North Atlantic to restore the salinity.

The problem with this book is that all this drama seems secondary to the quite boring (at least to me) exploits of the main character Frank who is one of the climate scientists. Frank can't find accommodation in DC after the flood so he eventually lives in a tree house in an outlying park and becomes obsessed with his primitive side. He plays frisbee golf with a group who frequents the park, hangs out with other park residents and imagines he is a primitive hunter, even buying a paleolithic hand axe. On the way he has further encounters with the mysterious woman introduced in the first book, discoveres he is under domestic surveillance and even considers a romantic relationship with his boss at NSF.

The problem is that all the fundamental themes underlying this book become secondary to Frank's adventures and I frankly got tired of reading about him. The book is interesting in parts but there are large sections that I just felt like skipping over.

Kim Stanley Robinson has a certain style in his writing and perhaps I'm somewhat incompatible with that style but I have liked many of his other books including the "Mars" series.

Forty Signs of rain was a better book in my opinion because it handled the interplay between scientists and politicians better and was a more interesting story. I'm afraid Fifty Degrees Below was a disappointment to me and the third book in the trilogy will have to be a lot better to restore my faith. Fifty Degrees below occasionally verges on being a good book but doesn't quite get there.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Good but--as Publisher's Weekly said--didactic.

There are some perils in writing such a near-term speculative book when one takes the long-view of critical appraisal (as we try to do). The problem: reality is very quickly going to outstrip its relevance. For all that this book may be worthwhile reading to a lot of different people in the next 5 or even 10 years, it is not artistic to the point where readers will return to these novels decades after many of these issues have been resolved one way or the other. (Michael Flynn's gorgeous book on space exploration, Firestar, has the same problem.) To combat that, near-term books need to exude an immediacy and power and, very simply, that power is lacking in Fifty Degrees. Is it interesting: yes. Is it relevant: yes. It's going to make the rounds, many people will talk about it, other people will proffer its ideas in conversation at cocktail parties as if it's their own (a high form of flattery). Yet its life will be brief, necessarily so. People will go back and read science that's out-of-date: as they do with some Asimov, Wells, and Lewis' Space Trilogy. We don't see any particular draw in these novels for people to do that.

WHO SHOULD READ:

A whole host of people will really enjoy this book. Robinson fans who have enjoyed the Martian Trilogy, The Years of Rice and Salt, and Fort Signs of Rain will eagerly buy and deeply appreciate. We encourage them to do so. Readers of a more Capitalist bent, like us, will actually enjoy this novel more since the politics are ratcheted back a bit and makes the whole thing a bit more compelling. There is a mainstream audience which doesn't often venture over to this side of the bookstore who will also enjoy this book: people who are concerned about climate change, students in the sciences, and amateurs who read non-fiction by Jared Diamond (Guns, Germs, and Steel and Collapse) will also find these novels highly engaging.

WHO SHOULD PASS:

People deeply immersed in the politics and the science of these issues is probably-and counter intuitively-going to be annoyed by this book. It is not enough of a polemic to satisfy many of these people and the science is not rendered so complete and visceral to satisfy that camp either. These are novels made for a much more mainstream audience and we suppose many elements more on the fringe might even accuse Robinson of selling out. There are also a large number of science-fiction fans who want to read books in this genre for the fiction in the science; near-term novels of any scope probably annoy them in general and this novel will annoy them even more due to the near-term political nature of the novel. These people should be steered towards the Martian trilogy but away from this Climate Change trilogy.

READ THE ENTIRE REVIEW AT INCHOATUS.COM
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Followup to the Critically Acclaimed Forty Days of Rain

Fifty Degrees Below continues the story begun in Robinson's 2004 book Forty Signs of Rain. This author is well versed in the finer points of series writing (all his previous successes have been series), and the plot continues seamlessly from the first book to the second, with enough stylistic differences to make it interesting--at least for the first two-thirds or so.

In Forty Signs of Rain, Washington, D.C. was hammered by the storm of the century, resulting in a flooded Potomac and an underwater capital. In the sequel, the world sees more evidence of global warming, as the Gulf Stream shuts down in response to melting polar ice caps and the earth enters a new ice age.

Anyone who has seen 2004's blockbuster movie The Day after Tomorrow is familiar with the theory that the first real sign that global warming has reached its tipping point will be record cold temperatures. Robinson apparently believes Al Gore on this point. But he's a good enough writer to make the rather alarmist theory seem menacing and plausible, not to mention entertaining.

Where the first book in the series focused primarily on Charlie and Anna Quibbler and their lives in the political world, Fifty Degrees Below is primarily the story of Frank Vanderwal, another character from the first book and a friend of Charlie and Anna's. We see Frank's new life in the aftermath of the big storm, including his problems finding a place to live now that he's decided to stay in the D.C. area instead of moving back to California, as he planned to do at the end of Forty Signs. We also see a sinister conspiracy unfolding, as the identity of Frank's mysterious elevator make-out partner is finally uncovered and a plot to neutralize the National Science Foundation's political influence is set in motion.

As with the first book, the most interesting aspect of Robinson's writing is the character development, which draws heavily on scientific studies having to do with supposedly evolved social patterns and behaviors. In the first book Frank thought a lot about the so-called "prison game study," wherein prisoners were given rewards or punishments depending on how they interacted with each other in positive or negative ways, and he concluded that the "always generous" lifestyle yields the most consistently positive results (though only when interacting with others utilizing the same strategy). In this book Frank spends a lot of time reflecting on man's relationship to nature and how humanity's millennia-long struggle with the elements has shaped our perceptions and reactions to nature and each other. It's very interesting, if a bit pedantic, and if you can get past the purely secular nature of the presented philosophy, you can learn quite a bit about the author's theories of sociological evolution.

The book's weakness is that the author focuses so much on the science behind the plot that the plot itself is at risk of neglect. Though it's interesting to see how Frank, living outdoors by choice, survives the bitterly cold winter, it would be more so if the cold temperatures were incorporated into a literary climax rather than simply an interesting scientific development. With the cold snap coming halfway through the book, the last hundred pages have nothing to carry the reader through other than more of the same quasi-scientific ruminations. Still, there are some dramatic moments, such as the Quibblers and Frank witnessing the final destruction of the island of Khembalung, threatened in the first book by rising sea levels.

This book contains more sexual content than the first one, and there is enough profanity to seem realistic, given the characters' secular worldview. For some Christian readers, the more offensive content may be the author's apparent support of evolution and unintelligent design. The primary religious references in the book are of Tibetan Buddhism; God as a Creator is not present.

The book would be better if it were more of a story and less of a science course (liberal-leaning science at that). Still, the author's skill in making even dry scientific theory seem interesting and compelling (for a while) make it a worthwhile read.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

awaiting the final book

In the second installment of this trilogy, in flood ravaged Washington D.C. the scientists across the river at NSF are working overtime trying to find solutions to the ominous challenge presented by rapid climate change. The main character, Frank, unhappy with the status quo, is forced to juggle the task of controlling global warming, living in DC without a home, and of course there's the mystery woman from the elevator.

Although often breezy and oversimplified, I greatly enjoyed the science writing. The dialogue and brainstorming sessions between NSF scientists were entertaining. The tedium of bureaucracy and the excitement of scientific discovery are successfully brought to life in a manner that was fun to read.

Spread throughout the book in short anecdotes and comments are several political diatribes which I found pretty boring and thoughtless. Since a couple of the characters are explicitly involved in politics, the senator Phil Chase and his assistant Charlie, these comments were consistent with the direction of the book. However, they detracted somewhat from my enjoyment of the story.

I predict that the chessman character will turn out to be a trouble maker, the mystery girl from the elevator will be needed to save the world, and of course that the scientists will triumph in the end.
9 people found this helpful