Disgrace: A Novel
Disgrace: A Novel book cover

Disgrace: A Novel

Paperback – August 27, 2008

Price
$10.57
Format
Paperback
Pages
220
Publisher
Penguin Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0143115281
Dimensions
5.1 x 0.6 x 7.8 inches
Weight
5.8 ounces

Description

" Disgrace is not a hard or obscure book-it is, among other things, compulsively readable-but what it may well be is an authentically spiritual document, a lament for the soul of a disgraced century." - The New Yorker Born in Cape Town, South Africa, on February 9, 1940, John Michael Coetzee studied first at Cape Town and later at the University of Texas at Austin, where he earned a Ph.D. degree in literature. In 1972 he returned to South Africa and joined the faculty of the University of Cape Town. His works of fiction include Dusklands, Waiting for the Barbarians , which won South Africa’s highest literary honor, the Central News Agency Literary Award, and the Life and Times of Michael K ., for which Coetzee was awarded his first Booker Prize in 1983. He has also published a memoir, Boyhood: Scenes From a Provincial Life , and several essays collections. He has won many other literary prizes including the Lannan Award for Fiction, the Jerusalem Prize and The Irish Times International Fiction Prize. In 1999 he again won Britain’s prestigious Booker Prize for Disgrace , becoming the first author to win the award twice in its 31-year history. In 2003, Coetzee was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. ONE FOR. A MAN of his age, fifty-two, divorced, he has, to his mind,solved the problem of sex rather well. On Thursday afternoons hedrives to Green Point. Punctually at two p.m. he presses the buzzerat the entrance to Windsor Mansions, speaks his name, and enters.Waiting for him at the door of No. II3 is Soraya. He goes straightthrough to the bedroom, which is pleasant-smelling and softly lit,and undresses. Soraya emerges from the bathroom, drops her robe,slides into bed beside him. 'Have you missed me?' she asks. 'I missyou all the time,' he replies. He strokes her honey-brown body,unmarked by the sun; he stretches her out, kisses her breasts; theymake love. Soraya is tall and slim, with long black hair and dark, liquid eyes.Technically he is old enough to be her father; but then,technically, one can be a father at twelve. He has been on herbooks for over a year; he finds her entirely satisfactory. In thedesert of the week Thursday has become an oasis of luxe et velupté . In bed Soraya is not effusive. Her temperament is in fact ratherquiet, quiet and docile. In her general opinions she is surprisinglymoralistic. She is offended by tourists who bare their breasts('udders', she calls them) on public beaches; she thinks vagabondsshould be rounded up and put to work sweeping the streets. How she reconciles her opinions with her line of business he does not ask. Because he takes pleasure in her, because his pleasure isunfailing, an affection has grown up in him for her. To somedegree, he believes, this affection is reciprocated. Affection maynot be love, but it is at least its cousin. Given their unpromisingbeginnings, they have been lucky, the two of them: he to havefound her, she to have found him. His sentiments are, he is aware, complacent, even uxorious.Nevertheless he does not cease to hold to them. For a ninety-minute session he pays her R4oo, of which halfgoes to Discreet Escorts. It seems a pity that Discreet Escortsshould get so much. But they own No. II3 and other flats inWindsor Mansions; in a sense they own Soraya too, this part ofher, this function. He has toyed with the idea of asking her to see him in her owntime. He would like to spend an evening with her, perhaps even awhole night. But not the morning after. He knows too muchabout himself to subject her to a morning after, when he will becold, surly, impatient to be alone. That is his temperament. His temperament is not going to change,he is too old for that. His temperament is fixed, set. The skull, followed by the temperament: the two hardest parts of the body. Follow your temperament. It is not a philosophy, he would notdignity it with that name. It is a rule, like the Rule of St Benedict.He is in good health, his mind is clear. By profession he is, orhas been, a scholar, and scholarship still engages, intermittently, thecore of him. He lives within his income, within his temperament,within his emotional means. Is he happy? By most measurements,yes, he believes he is. However, he has not forgotten the lastchorus of Oedipus : Call no man happy until he is dead. In the field of sex his temperament, though intense, has neverbeen passionate. Were he to choose a totem, it would be the snake.Intercourse between Soraya and himself must be, he imagines, rather like the copulation of snakes: lengthy, absorbed, but ratherabstract, rather dry, even at its hottest. Is Soraya's totem the snake too? No doubt with other men shebecomes another woman: lu donna é mobile . Yet at the level oftemperament her affinity with him can surely not be feigned.Though by occupation she is a loose woman he trusts her,within limits. During their sessions he speaks to her with a certainfreedom, even on occasion unburdens himself She knows the factsof his life. She has heard the stories of his two marriages, knowsabout his daughter and his daughter's ups and downs. She knowsmany of his opinions. Of her life outside Windsor Mansions Soraya reveals nothing.Soraya is not her real name, that he is sure of. There are signs shehas borne a child, or children. It may be that she is not aprofessional at all. She may work for the agency only one or twoafternoons a week, and for the rest live a respectable life in thesuburbs, in Rylands or Athlone. That would be unusual for aMuslim, but all things are possible these days. About his own job he says little, not wanting to-bore her. Heearns his living at the Cape Technical University, formerly CapeTown University College. Once a professor of modern languages,he has been, since Classics and Modern Languages were closeddown as part of the great rationalization, adjunct professor ofcommunications. Like all rationalized personnel, he is allowed tooffer one special-field course a year, irrespective of enrolment,because that is good for morale. This year he is offering a course inthe Romantic poets. For the rest he teaches Communications I0I,'Communication Skills' and Communications 20I, 'AdvancedCommunication Skills'. Although he devotes hours of each day to his new discipline, hefinds its first premise, as enunciated in the Communications I0Ihandbook, preposterous: 'Human society has created language in order that we may communicate our thoughts, feelings andintentions to each other.' His own opinion, which he does not air,is that the origins of speech lie in song, and the origins of song inthe need to fill out with sound the overlarge and rather emptyhuman soul. In the course of a career stretching back a quarter of a centuryhe has published three books, none of which has caused a stir oreven a ripple: the first on opera ( Boito and the Faust Legend: TheGenesis of Mefistofele ), the second on vision as eros ( The Vision ofRichard of St. Victor ), the third on Wordsworth and history( Wordsworth and the Burden of the Post }. In the past few years he has been playing with the idea of a workon Byron. At first he had thought it would be another book,another critical opus. But all his sallies at writing it have boggeddown in tedium. The truth is, he is tired of criticism, tired of' prosemeasured by the yard. What he wants to write is music: Byron inItaly , a meditation on love between the sexes in the form of achamber opera. Through his mind, while he faces his Communications classes, fit phrases, tunes, fragments of song from the unwritten work. Hehas never been much of a teacher; in this transformed and, to hismind, emasculated institution of learning he is more out of place than ever. But then, so are other of his colleagues from the olddays, burdened with upbringings inappropriate to the tasks they areset to perform; clerks in a post-religious age. Because he has no respect for the material he teaches, he makesno impression on his students. They look through him when hespeaks, forget his name. Their indifference galls him more than hewill admit. Nevertheless he fulfils to the letter his obligationstoward them, their parents, and the state. Month after month hesets, collects, reads, and annotates their assignments, correctinglapses in punctuation, spelling and usage, interrogating weak arguments, appending to each paper a brief, considered critique. He continues to teach because it provides him with a livelihood;also because it teaches him humility, brings it home to him whohe is in the world. The irony does not escape him: that the onewho comes to teach learns the keenest of lessons, while those whocome to learn learn nothing. It is a feature of his profession onwhich he does not remark to Soraya. He doubts there is an ironyto match it in hers. In the kitchen of the flat in Green Point there are a kettle, plasticcups, a jar of instant coffee, a bowl with sachets of sugar. Therefrigerator holds a supply of bottled water. In the bathroom thereis soap and a pile of towels, in the cupboard clean bed linen. Sorayakeeps her makeup in an overnight bag. A place of assignation,nothing more, functional, clean, well regulated. The first time Soraya received him she wore vermilion lipstickand heavy eyeshadow. Not liking the stickiness of the makeup, heasked her to wipe it off. She obeyed, and has never worn it since.A ready learner, compliant, pliant. He likes giving her presents. At New Year he gave her anenamelled bracelet, at Eid a little malachite heron that caught hiseye in a curio shop. He enjoys her pleasure, which is quiteunaffected. It surprises him that ninety minutes a week of a woman'scompany are enough to make him happy, who used to think heneeded a wife, a home, a marriage. His needs turn out to be quitelight, after all, light and fleeting, like those of a butterfly. Noemotion, or none but the deepest, the most unguessed-at: aground bass of contentedness, like the hum of traffic that lulls thecity—dweller to sleep, or like the silence of the night to countryfolk. He thinks of Emma Bovary, coming home sated, glazen-eyed,from an afternoon of reckless fucking. So this is bliss! , says Emma, marvelling at herself in the mirror. So this is the bliss the poets speakof? Well, if poor ghostly Emma were ever to find her way to CapeTown, he would bring her along one Thursday afternoon to showher what bliss can be: a moderate bliss, a moderated bliss. Then one Saturday morning everything changes. He is in the cityon business; he is walking down St George's Street when his eyesfall on a slim figure ahead of him in the crowd. It is Soraya,unmistakably, flanked by two children, two boys. They arecarrying parcels; they have been shopping. He hesitates, then follows at a distance. They disappear intoCaptain Dorego's Fish Inn. The boys have Soraya's lustrous hairand dark eyes. They can only be her sons. He walks on, turns back, passes Captain Dorego's a second time.The three are seated at a table in the window. For an instant,through the glass, Soraya's eyes meet his. He has always been a man of the city, at home amid a flux ofbodies where eros stalks and glances flash like arrows. But thisglance between himself and Soraya he regrets at once. At their rendezvous the next Thursday neither mentions theincident. Nonetheless, the memory hangs uneasily over them. Hehas no wish to upset what must be, for Soraya, a precarious doublelife. He is all for double lives, triple lives, lives lived incompartments. Indeed, he feels, if anything, greater tenderness forher. Your secret is safe with me , he would like to say. But neither he nor she can put aside what has happened. Thetwo little boys become presences between them, playing quiet asshadows in a corner of the room where their mother and thestrange man couple. In Soraya's arms he becomes, fleetingly, theirfather: foster-father, step-father, shadow-father. Leaving her bedafterwards, he feels their eyes flicker over him covertly, curiously. His thoughts turn, despite himself to the other father, the real one. Does he have any inkling of what his wife is up to, or has heelected the bliss of ignorance? He himself has no son. His childhood was spent in a family ofwomen. As mother, aunts, sisters fell away, they were replaced indue course by mistresses, wives, a daughter. The company ofwomen made of him a lover of women and, to an extent, awomanizer. With his height, his good bones, his olive skin, hisFlowing hair, he could always count on a degree of magnetism. Ifhe looked at a woman in a certain way, with a certain intent, shewould return his look, he could rely on that. That was how helived; for years, for decades, that was the backbone of his life. Then one day it all ended. Without warning his powers fled.Glances that would once have responded to his slid over, past, throughhim. Overnight he became a ghost. If he wanted a woman he had tolearn to pursue her; often, in one way or another, to buy her. He existed in an anxious hurry of promiscuity. He had affairswith the wives of colleagues; he picked up tourists in bars on the waterfront or at the Club Italia; he slept with whores. His introduction to Soraya took place in a dim little sitting-room off the front office of Discreet Escorts, with Venetian blindsover the windows, pot plants in the corners, stale smoke hangingin the air. She was on their books under 'Exotic'. The photographshowed her with a red passion-flower in her hair and the faintestof lines at the corners of her eyes. The entry said 'Afternoons only'.That was what decided him: the promise of shuttered rooms, coolsheets, stolen hours. From the beginning it was satisfactory, just what he wanted. Abull's eye. In a year he has not needed to go back to the agency.Then the accident in St George's Street, and the strangeness thathas followed. Though Soraya still keeps her appointments, he feelsa growing coolness as she transforms herself into just anotherwoman and him into just another client. He has a shrewd idea of how prostitutes speak among them-selves about the men who frequent them, the older men inparticular. They tell stories, they laugh, but they shudder too, asone shudders at a cockroach in a washbasin in the middle of' thenight. Soon, daintily, maliciously, he will be shuddered over. It isa fate he cannot escape. On the fourth Thursday after the incident, as he is leaving theapartment, Soraya makes the announcement he has been steelinghimself against. 'My mother is ill. I'm going to take a break to lookafter her. I won't be here next week.' 'Will I see you the week after?' 'I'm not sure. It depends on how she gets on. You had betterphone first.' 'I don't have a number.' ' 'Phone the agency. They'll know.' He waits a few days, then telephones the agency. Soraya? Sorayahas left us, says the man. No, we cannot put you in touch with her,that would be against house rules. Would you like an introductionto another of our hostesses? Lots of exotics to choose from — Malaysian, Thai, Chinese, you name it. He spends an evening with another Soraya — Soraya hasbecome, it seems, a popular nom de commerce — in a hotel room inLong Street. This one is no more than eighteen, unpractised, to hismind coarse. 'So what do you do?' she says as she slips off herclothes. 'Export-import,' he says. "You don't say,' she says. There is a new secretary in his department. He takes her tolunch at a restaurant a discreet distance from the campus andlistens while, over shrimp salad, she complains about her sons'school. Drug-pedlars hang around the playing-fields, she says, andthe police do nothing. For the past three years she and herhusband have had their name on a list at the New Zealandconsulate, to emigrate. 'You people had it easier. I mean, whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation, at least you knewwhere you were.' 'You people? he says. 'What people?' 'I mean your generation. Now people just pick and choosewhich laws they want to obey. It's anarchy. How can you bring upchildren when there's anarchy all around?' Her name is Dawn. The second time he takes her out they stop at his house and have sex. It is a failure. Bucking and clawing, sheworks herself into a froth of excitement that in the end only repelshim. He lends her a comb, drives her back to the campus. After that he avoids her, taking care to skirt the office where sheworks. In return she gives him a hurt look, then snubs him. He ought to give up, retire from the game. At what age, hewonders, did Origen castrate himself? Not the most graceful ofsolutions, but then ageing is not a graceful business. A clearing ofthe decks, at least, so that one can turn one's mind to the properbusiness of the old: preparing to die. Might one approach a doctor and ask for it? A simple enoughoperation, surely: they do it to animals every clay, and animalssurvive well enough, if one ignores a certain residue of sadness.Severing, tying off: with local anesthetic and a steady hand and amodicum of phlegm one might even do it oneself, out of atextbook. A man on a chair snipping away at himself: an ugly sight,but no more ugly, from a certain point of view, than the same manexercising himself on the body of a woman. There is still Soraya. He ought to close that chapter. Instead, hepays a detective agency to track her down. Within days he has herreal name, her address, her telephone number. He telephones atnine in the morning, when the husband and children will be out.'Soraya? he says. 'This is David. How are you? When can I seeyou again? A long silence before she speaks. 'I don't know who you are she says. 'You are harassing me in my own house. I demand you will never phone me here again, never.' Demand. She means command . Her shrillness surprises him: therehas been no intimation of it before. But then, what should apredator expect when he intrudes into the vixen's nest, into thehome of her cubs? He puts down the telephone. A shadow of envy passes over himfor the husband he has never seen. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Based on the novel by Nobel Prize-winning author J.M. Coetzee, the major motion picture stars John Malkovich.
  • J.M. Coetzee's latest novel,
  • The Schooldays of Jesus
  • , is now available from Viking.
  • Late Essays: 2006-2016
  • will be available January 2018.
  • At fifty-two, Professor David Lurie is divorced, filled with desire, but lacking in passion. When an affair with a student leaves him jobless, shunned by friends, and ridiculed by his ex-wife, he retreats to his daughter Lucy's smallholding. David's visit becomes an extended stay as he attempts to find meaning in his one remaining relationship. Instead, an incident of unimaginable terror and violence forces father and daughter to confront their strained relationship and the equallity complicated racial complexities of the new South Africa.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(1.4K)
★★★★
25%
(1.2K)
★★★
15%
(707)
★★
7%
(330)
23%
(1.1K)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Unsustainability in and Inflexible World

*This review contains spoilers!*

In Disgrace, J.M. Coetzee artfully navigates the complicated liminal spaces that exist in a world structured by binaries: African/White, old/young, past/future, even living/dead. David Lurie, a shamed Professor of English at a Cape Town university finds himself in the consistently unsustainable position of attempting to live beyond these entrenched oppositions, and Disgrace traces the effects of his resistance.

David is an intensely unlikable protagonist - his utter lack of moral compass remains steadfast throughout the novel. When we meet him, he is perpetrating a scandal that will define the trajectory of the novel - at best, it might be called an inappropriate professor/teacher relationship, at worst a series of unapologetic date-rapes. He leaves his University after refusing to accept the terms of his punishment (therapy and perhaps more importantly, repentance) and retreats to the country to live with his daughter Lucy. There, he only gets to live a few weeks of country life before their household is violently disrupted by a break-in during which Lucy is raped by two men. The rest of the novel deals with the aftermath - both Lucy's reaction, and David's resistance to it.

Certainly, a large chunk of the book deals intimately with the political landscape of South Africa, and in particular focuses on the complicated race relations between the white people and the native Africans. Though this takes place long after Apartheid has ended, Coetzee makes it strikingly clear that history has a way of resisting being laid to rest. The climax of this particular trajectory occurs when Lucy reveals that she has begun to view her rape as restitution: "What if that is the price one has to pay [...]? They see me as owing something" (158). This moment in which Lucy allows herself to be subjugated, to submit to a side of oppositions, is the moment in which Coetzee fully realizes the inflexible nature of the system.

In the last few pages of the novel, Coetzee writes of David's reflections upon his volunteering job euthanizing dogs: "What the dog will not be able to work out [...], what his nose will not tell him, is how one can enter what seems to be an ordinary room and never come out again. Something happens in this room, something unmentionable: here the soul is yanked out of the body; briefly it hangs about in the air, twisting and contorting; then it is sucked away and is gone" (219). With this quote, Coetzee grasps the heart of the matter that he has spent a novel untangling. Life, or at least the life that he describes, takes place within that brief liminal period. Nothing is absolute, and the ostensible binaries that structure the world are proven to fall apart under scrutiny. And yet, though nobody is actually born to live within one side of these binaries, it is a structure imposed upon all humans from birth. We see resistance to this in every action David takes: from attempting to live without age, to refusing to accept or deny his charges, to vehemently chasing down Lucy's rapists, to moving from country to city without finding wholeness in either.

How do we resist this without falling apart? Coetzee doesn't seem to propose an answer to that - as we watch David resist and still fail, resist and still become utterly subjugated, we are forced to come to terms with the fact that living beyond the inflexible structure of the world is absolutely unsustainable. Thus Coetzee doesn't provide an answer, he is just here to give us the lay of the land.

However, just because he writes of an unlikable character dealing with unsolvable problems does not mean that Coetzee doesn't speckle Disgrace with disarming moments of heart. Importantly, amongst the bigger issues that he grapples with, Coetzee also sets a narrative cadence that allows for moments of lovely reflection on particulars of life and relationships. One that is really perfect, I think, is a line describing a short car trip with Lucy: "He sits beside her, eating the sandwiches she has made. His nose drips; he hopes she does not notice" (71). Here, Coetzee's narrative power for developing character and relationships is palpable. We still might not feel tenderness for David, but his humanity is tangible.

Unlike many other novels that begin with a morally ambiguous character, Disgrace is not about redemption or recuperation. David remains unlikable, Lucy remains subjugated, her rapists remain at large. In this way, Coetzee is able to reveal the thrust of a complicated issue without offering a solution. Thus, Disgrace becomes much more than a political statement about race relations in South Africa - it is also a portrait of the shared human condition itself. By blurring binaries that exist in absolutes almost everywhere in the world, Coetzee powerfully reveals the heart of problem everybody must learn to live around. People here can call him a misogynist, a rape-apologist, or any other number of words ending in "-ist," but I do not think that is the case. Coetzee writes David Lurie not as an emblem, but as a warning - this is what happens when a society makes human nature itself an unsustainable condition.
44 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Hollow and pompous

This book drives home the fact that awards are more about politics than quality work.

Reading this story is like taking a cold bath with someone you dislike. The hollow self-absorbed and inert characters drift around like zombies, completely unaware of the destructive effect they have on others. It's conclusion, the hideous protagonist's "redemption" through euthanizing a sick dog is as cheap, shallow and manipulative as any long distance telephone commercial.

Reading Coetzee's other work, I am left with the distinct impression that this limp dishrag character of the old lecherous professor who reappears again and again in various guises in his writing is based on Coetzee himself. This would be forgivable if there was any evidence of self-awareness or an iota of transformation. There is not. Nor is there any insight into the complex social realities of South Africa - unless of course the horrors of Apartheid are the result of massive brain death in the entire caucasian population.

If you expect to feel anything but repulsion by reading this, don't hold your breath. Expecting some humanity from this writing is like expecting comfort through an act of necrophilia.
27 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Dark and Depressing

In my quest to acquaint myself with well-regarded contemporary authors, I chose this particular work because it was a winner of the Mann Booker prize several years ago. What a disappointment. The reader is forced to follow the main character through a series of slimy encounters with the underside of South African life-prostitutes, rapists, family members in angst, caged dogs, and gangs of disaffected natives. The work begins and ends on sour notes and I was quite sour by the end.
It will be a long time, if ever, before I attempt another novel by this author. There are numerous beautifully written works out there, many of which deal with angst in one form or another, and I am sorry that I wasted my time on this one.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Booker AND Noble Prize - Oh C'mon!

I fully expect for this review to get trashed given the popularity of this book but here it goes anyway. This was at best a mediocre book. Unlike many of the negative reviewers I did not dislike it because it was depressing. The author tries very hard to write a depressing book but I felt little for the characters to be disturbed or to be depressed by their misfortune. That is a big failure for the author. The protagonist is not meant to be a likable character but that is not the problem either. Coetzee simply fails to develop his character or for that matter any of the other characters in the book. They are not believable. Their actions are unconventional, which by itself is not a problem, but the author's lack of explaining and convincing readers leaves readers puzzled.

I noticed that many of the 1-star reviewers rated the book poorly because of the sad emotions it brought on them. Unfortunately for me I cannot even admit to those same emotions. At least they felt something! Yes, it was a depressing book but it lacked depth and hence I did not become too involved in the story. If your goal is to learn a bit more about South Africa I would also recommend looking else where. Skip this one!
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Stupid, overrated book

Let me first say that I love J.M. Coetzee, I think that Waiting for the Barbarians is one of the finest books I've ever read, and I think he is one of the finest living writers around, fully deserving of the Nobel prize.

However, I hated Disgrace. I can appreciate the writing at times, but all I remember of the book is a disgusting, morally bankrupt main character, his fat daughter, pointless, unsatisfying sex and violence, and the fact that the book has a non-ending. It is all gloom and doom and misery, and we're supposed to accept this as a masterpiece. Ridiculous.

I think this book is terrible and I'd encourage readers to explore his other books before they read this.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Masterly written pointless depression

My first impression with this book was that it was extremely well written, everything that Coetzee choses to describe gives an extra dimension to the scene.

After reading it though I was left with one feeling: Hate. I hated that the book left me with a lessened faith in humanity, feeling powerless to the evil things that go on in this world and the pathetic apathy, in lack of a better word, of the main person.

Although masterly written, I deeply regret reading this book to such an extent that I want to prevent others from reading it. I wish I could say it gave me nothing, but it ruined some beautiful days.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

There's little to add, except . . .

I had not read J. M. Coetzee before but will do so again as I appreciate complex reads that require a certain amount of attention. Disgrace is such a novel, with an abundance of overlapping themes: racial, moral (apart from sexual), sexual, familial (the father- daughter relationship) personal responsibility and the treatment of animals.

There is little to add to the other reviews which number close to 400, except my own appreciation of this dense and provocative novel. Since I'm an animal person, I appreciate Coetzee's treatment of a theme apparently close to his heart: the mistreatment, neglect and abuse of animals.

David Lurie, a lecherous and arrogant professor who comes to stay with his daughter because of an "lurid" (is the similarity of the sound of this word to the protagonist's name an accident?) affair to which he readily confesses and owns up to, in the end finds the love and devotion of abandoned animals a major comfort in a life that has, at least for the moment, amounted to a wreck.

Lurie's redemption is never complete because he is a damaged human being for oh, so many reasons. But it comes close when he tries (unsuccessfully) to save his daughter from a brutal rape by a band of natives who want control of her land. It comes close, when he embraces the unattractive would-be veterinarian -- a woman that would never catch his eye in the real world. And he comes close when he derides the hearing that accuses him of inappropriate behavior with a co-ed who is one of his students. He is guilty, he says, but he will not beg for mercy in order to save his job and his pension as a tenured professor. He comes close in attempting to save his daughter (now pregnant from the attack of the maurading natives) from more humiliation by insisting she leave her homestead and come back to civilization. She refuses.

Disgrace is a word that fits the old David Lurie. His path from dis-grace leads him in the end to "grace" revealed when he carries his favorite crippled dog, "like a lamb" to be euthanized, knowing the sense of finality, knowing it can no longer be avoided, facing, and accepting the pain and loneliness it will cost him. The dog is his own path to redemption as he recognizes the soul is separate from the body. In this final act, "when the soul is out" Lurie sacrifices his own comfort and well-being --perhaps for the first time in his life but he also performs an act of faith.

This is not a new book, and is probably not his first novel. It is my plan to go back and read them all as J.M. Coetzee is now one of my favorite writers.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointingly simplistic work from a master writer

I think Coetzee is a brilliant writer and Michael K is an astonishing book but few books have ever disappointed me as much as this one. As an allegory of post apartheid South Africa this book is a nasty mess. It is not reasonable to ask Coetzee to present an optimistic or hopeful vision but for readers who don't know South Africa and cannot put this book's racial politics into some kind of context, this will only reinforce the sense that the new government/social order is no better than the old one--just new masters exacting revenge from the old ones in the most sickening ways. In spite of all the real problems that South Africa has, that is not a fair conclusion. If you find this book compelling, ask yourself why that is. Does it provide a comforting sort of message that everyone is racist and that only animals really deserve our love and concern?
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Impossibly depressing and abhorrent!!!!!!!

This is one of the worst books I have ever read. No redeeming value here. Just alot of disturbing and sad things, so sickening that I could not wait to the end. I thought the end would somehow redeem it, but no. It made me sick and sad that an author like this could actually win an award for this piece of trash!!!!!!!!!
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Will put you in a bad mood and crush your spirit.

Another example of "literature" that gets that moniker by virtue of being dark, depressing, anxiety producing and pointless. It has the most flagrantly negative ending since Romeo and Juliet which is a roaring comedy in comparison. If you enjoy that, you may get off on reading this annoying, condescending, purposefully grim little book.
9 people found this helpful