Comrade J
Comrade J book cover

Comrade J

Hardcover – January 24, 2008

Price
$15.40
Format
Hardcover
Pages
352
Publisher
Putnam Adult
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0399154393
Dimensions
6.32 x 1.24 x 9.3 inches
Weight
1.25 pounds

Description

Pete Earley, a former reporter for The Washington Post , is the author of eight works of nonfiction, including the bestsellers The Hot House and Family of Spies , and the award-winning Circumstantial Evidence and Crazy . Washingtonian magazine ranks him as one of ten journalist/authors in America "who have the power to introduce new ideas and give them currency." He is also the author of three novels. From The Washington Post Reviewed by David Wise The CIA and the FBI were hugely damaged by the supermoles Aldrich Ames and Robert Hanssen, who ran their own private spy bazaars and peddled vast amounts of U.S. secrets to the Russians for years. No one seemed to notice when Ames drove a red Jaguar XJ6 to CIA headquarters or when the FBI's Hanssen escorted a stripper to Hong Kong. So it is understandable that the two agencies might want the public to know that for at least a few years in the late 1990s, they had a mole sending secrets the other way. Enter Col. Sergei Tretyakov, a Russian spy who defected in New York in 2000 as the deputy rezident (station chief) there of the SVR, the successor to the KGB's foreign intelligence directorate. Some four years later, author Pete Earley found himself in a suite at the Ritz-Carlton in Tysons Corner with two FBI agents, two CIA officers, soft drinks, snacks and the defector. The meeting had been set up by an FBI agent who contacted Earley and encouraged him to write a book about the Russian. Earley, a former reporter for The Washington Post, is the author of Family of Spies, a well-received account of the John Walker naval spy ring, and Confessions of a Spy, a perceptive book about Ames that did not receive the attention it deserved, perhaps because it came out after four other books about the case, including (full disclosure) one by this reviewer. Tretyakov, who had been assigned to the Russian mission at the United Nations since 1995 and to Ottawa before that, gave the FBI 5,000 secret SVR cables and more than 100 Russian intelligence reports, according to one U.S. intelligence official cited by Earley. Tretyakov apparently first tried to defect around 1997 but agreed to remain as an "agent in place," passing secrets to the FBI until October 2000, when he vanished from a Russian residential compound in the Bronx with his wife, daughter and cat. Four months later, the United States acknowledged his defection, but Comrade J (the title is drawn from the KGB's code name for Tretyakov, Comrade Jean) is the first account of his espionage career. "It is one of our biggest success stories," puffed the unnamed U.S. intelligence official. Perhaps so. But to put the case in perspective, Tretyakov spied for the United States for about three years, while Ames sold secrets to Moscow for nine years (and caused the death of 10 Soviets working for the CIA), Walker spied for 18 years, and Hanssen betrayed America on and off for 22 years. Yet, if Tretyakov was not a world-class mole, he was definitely a world-class name-dropper. And that is the difficulty with his story. All defectors tend to exaggerate their own importance, or at least the importance of their information, especially if they worry that when they run out of secrets to reveal they may be cast aside. Tretyakov's claims about Strobe Talbott, the deputy secretary of state under President Clinton, are a case in point. "Russian intelligence had tricked and manipulated him," Tretyakov said. "He became an extremely valuable intelligence source." Georgi Mamedov, the Russian deputy minister of foreign affairs, was "a longtime co-optee" of the SVR, who met often with Talbott and who "was reporting everything that was said or done by Mr. Talbott directly to us at the Center." Employing a familiar Nixonian technique -- ironic for a KGB man -- Tretyakov is careful to add that Talbott "was not a Russian spy." Talbott, contacted by Earley, called the defector's charges "erroneous and/or misleading." When he spoke with Mamedov, Talbott said, both officials presumed they would each report everything back to their own governments. Similarly, Tretyakov says a friend who was the KGB man in Israel had Prime Minister Golda Meir as his "main target." But Tretyakov, Earley writes, said his friend "was elusive whenever he was asked whether or not Meir had been a KGB source." And, if one is to believe Tretyakov, the KGB "created the myth of nuclear winter" in the 1980s by hornswaggling Carl Sagan and other American and foreign scientists -- although, Earley points out, whether that is true "is impossible to discern." Tretyakov also accuses Eldar Kouliev, Azerbaijan's representative to the United Nations in the 1990s, of being "a deep-cover SVR intelligence officer." And former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Earley notes, "frequently met with Kouliev." And no doubt with Strobe Talbott. The defector describes five Canadians he says he recruited while stationed in Ottawa and gives their code designations but not their real names. He says he also recruited Alex Kindy, a former member of the Canadian parliament. He claims that Alexander Kramar was the SVR's man inside the much-criticized U.N. Oil-for-Food program -- part of the sanctions on Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime -- and helped the Russians steal half-a-billion dollars "to line the pockets of top Russian government leaders in both the Yeltsin and Putin presidencies." Also, according to Tretyakov, before the Soviet Union collapsed, KGB chief Vladimir Kryuchkov sent up to $50 billion in Communist Party funds out of the country, although where the money went, nobody knows. That's an oft-told tale in Russia; Tretyakov provides no details to substantiate the story of the party gold. The real value of Sergei Tretyakov's saga lies less in his scattershot claims and innuendoes than in his sharp eye and gossipy insider's view of the KGB/SVR's training, methods, foibles and tricks. The CIA resettles defectors and pays well the ones it likes. It certainly must like Tretyakov because, Earley reports, his pay package topped a record $2 million. He lives now in a secret location under a new name. His wife, Helen, drives a Porsche, and Sergei has a Lexus SUV. Copyright 2008, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.

Features & Highlights

  • Traces the story of the double agent who headed Russia's post-Cold War spy program in America, documenting his role in directing spy operations in New York City, recruiting and planting agents, manipulating intelligence, and influencing national policy before his astonishing defection. 80,000 first printing.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(215)
★★★★
25%
(90)
★★★
15%
(54)
★★
7%
(25)
-7%
(-25)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Too Many Agatha Christie Moments

I enjoyed reading "Comrade J," by Pete Earley, and I imagine that most others who are specialists in Russian Affairs will find points of interest as well, but in the end the book stands as a flawed work with too many "Agatha Christie moments" (where uninteresting facts are replaced by more interesting fiction). Earley's book is most compelling when it quotes Sergey Tretyakov about his own personal activities, such as the recruitment of spies in Canada, the internal operations of the Russian Mission to the UN, or the disarray faced by the SVR in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union. It falls off the rails, however, when it ventures away from these relatively safe areas to a discussion of other spy operations in which Tretyakov played no direct part, and where his assertions are dubious at best.

Tretyakov talks disparagingly about the "Agatha Christie recruitments" that were consistently being touted by lesser spies, i.e., recruitments that were the stuff of fiction and never actually occurred. He provides some good examples from the work of several of his colleagues who claimed to have recruited good agents or trusted contacts, but turned out in the end to have been either fools who had convinced themselves of their own success, or knaves who were making up intelligence reports from newspaper articles. For someone who is so skeptical of his colleagues, I think that Tretyakov falls for the "Agatha Christie recruitment" gambit a few too many times himself.

A case in point is the alleged "Special Unofficial Contact" status of Strobe Talbott. Tretyakov claims that Talbott's close friend and opposite number, Georgiy Mamedov, was secretly working for the SVR. According to Tretyakov, "Yuriy" Mamedov was feeding Talbott questions provided by the SVR, and was getting valuable intelligence out of Talbott's answers. Despite strong denials by both Talbott and Mamedov, the implication remains that Talbott was either a dupe, or up to no good, and his reputation has been damaged as a result. Speaking as a person who knows both Talbott and Mamedov, and as one who sat in on many meetings with them, I would have to say that Tretyakov's assertions are entirely without merit. Both Strobe and "Yuriy" were supplied with information by their own governments, and both wanted to appear as cooperative with each other as possible, because real benefits were reaped by both sides from their meetings. Mamedov was a respected interlocutor, but there is no way that he was manipulating Strobe, or being manipulated. What Tretyakov was describing as an intelligence operation was just simple diplomacy, on both sides. In order to get, you have to give, and it is best if you can do it with a smile on your face.

Similarly, Tretyakov's allegations that the Soviets fooled the whole world into believing "nuclear winter" theories also sounds suspiciously like another Agatha Christie moment. The Soviets were no doubt cheerleading from the sidelines, but to claim that they were responsible for the nuclear freeze movement of the early 1980s, or the widespread belief in the possibility of a nuclear winter is mixing up cause and effect. It is like the rooster who thinks that if he doesn't crow at dawn the sun won't come up.

I also have some quibbles with the editing of the book itself. Many Russian words are not transliterated correctly, and in several cases the names of Russian officials are mangled. The most egregious of these mistakes is when the book talks about KGB Chairman Vadim Bakatin (pp. 126-131). After getting the spelling of his name right the first time, Earley proceeds to spell it as "Batakin" for the rest of the book. I also agree with many other reviewers that an index would have been very helpful, and a bibliography and a few footnotes wouldn't have hurt either. Because of these omissions, the book strikes me has having been rushed into print before it was actually ready.

In sum, the book is an interesting read, but could have been much, much better had some of the more sensationalist side stories been cut out, and the author had just stuck to what Tretyakov really knew. Maybe there will be a second edition.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Valuable behind-the-scenes look at Russia

Earley's book is a well written biography of one of Russia's leading and well-placed spies in Canada and the U.S. who defected to the United States bringing a great deal of valuable intelligence with him. The CIA and FBI will not openly confirm the details of Tretyakov's story, and because of the defection, traveling to Russia would submit the author to a risk to his own safety. Earley is therefore forced to relate the story in more of a "Sergei says" manner to avoid appearing to stand behind the details related in the book. While this style makes the book less than gripping, it is nonetheless fascinating.

I found the look into Russia, particularly since the dismantling of the Soviet Union, to be absorbing and chilling. I don't believe that the American public has had an opportunity to see the true effect of the swift political changes in Russia. We have been lulled into a false sense that Russia is now an ally, which could not be farther from the truth if what Sergei says is accurate. Although the author could not verify much of the information, the story rings true and Earley has made efforts to confirm many details as an indication of the truthfulness of his subject.

The book is an easy read and presents a view of the new Russia which is seldom presented in the media. I recommend it for anyone interested in national security or international relations.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

No index or bibliography. Are you kidding? Both ...

No index or bibliography. Are you kidding?
Both items are mandatory pieces of the work, Mr. Earley. The omission is pure laziness.
Shame on you, sir.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Comrade J

The book is very good... It's exactly what you imagine when you read the synopse. It's a real tale of an ex-KGB secret agent (or so it seems), and it shows how a spy life may be, somtimes, hard to conciliate with personal lfe.

It's much worth what it costs.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Too Much Information

Too many characters, titles, etc for me. Story line got lost. I only read half of this book and gave it to library.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Good behind the scenes tour of Russia's SVR and KGB

This book is a biography of a Russian KGB/SVR officer. It has interesting behind-the-scenes coverages of a number of international events that either the KGB or SVR had significant roles. I found the book very interesting and read it in one evening.

Strengths: good coverage of the life of a KGB/SVR officer and his experiences. The book generally has good flow and adequate depth of coverage. Very exciting sections that implicate US and foreign officials for roles in spying. The best section discussed historical events that demonstrated corruption at the leadership levels in Russia.

Weaknesses: it appears the officer exaggerates some of his experiences. There are a number of sections that left me confused as to what happened, i.e., some details were clearly been absent. A number of sections did appear censored. Some of the historical details on Russian corruption were clearly exaggerated, but conveyed the spirit to the reader.

Recommended for: those that have an interest in contemporary Russian events, foreign affairs, intelligence, KGB, SVR, CIA, etc...
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Necessary Reminder of Post-Soviet Espionage

John Barron's Operation Solo (1996) provided an excellent account of a Cold War era Soviet who became an informant for the U.S.; this is a more modern example, concerning a senior KGB officer whose exploits continued into the Yeltsin and Putin eras. The extent of Russian post-Soviet espionage on the U.S. is underappreciated and this is a sell-written corrective.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An extended resume

This book reads like a 337 page resume rather than a gripping story. I still can't figure out whether that's because Sergei Tretyakov's story just wasn't that interesting, the author couldn't connect with him emotionally, or couldn't figure out how to put the story in compelling enough context for this reader. It was good enough for me to suggest you buy it and see what you think.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great read!

I am only about 1/3 into it, but it has been fascinating. Highly recommended! Then again, I "spent some time" in the Soviet Union (as a tourist, of course), so I have special interest in this subject.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A patriot opens his eyes

Tretyakov was a career spy who honored his motherland and the KGB who was responsible for protecting it. Over time, though, he came to see the contradictions in the Soviet system and the corruption of those in the highest positions of power. This only worsened when the Soviet system broke apart. The book chronicles the author's development as an independent thinker. It is not idealogical. He is simply a patriot who realizes that his patriotism has become misplaced.

The story also reminds us that the world is a rough place, and is full of powerful people who don't follow the same rules we do. This is especially clear in the account of the Iraq Oil-for-Food program, which may have been the biggest international con of all time.
2 people found this helpful