Bleeding Edge
Bleeding Edge book cover

Bleeding Edge

Hardcover – September 17, 2013

Price
$25.48
Format
Hardcover
Pages
477
Publisher
Penguin Press
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1594204234
Dimensions
6.3 x 4.6 x 9.5 inches
Weight
1.72 pounds

Description

From Publishers Weekly Reviewed by David Kipen. Published 50 years ago by long-gone J.B. Lippincott & Co., Thomas Pynchon's V. wasn't just the best first novel ever, it was a blueprint for his entire career. Much as that book yoyo-ed between an international femme fatale and a feckless contemporary klutz, the Pynchon shelf has alternated between globe-trotting, century-spanning bricks like Gravity's Rainbow (1973), and impish, only slightly historical, California-set bagatelles like Inherent Vice (2009). Now comes Bleeding Edge, a lovably scruffy comedy of remarriage, half-hidden behind the lopsided Groucho mask of Pynchon's second straight private-eye story. Like Ornette Coleman's riff on The Rite of Spring, it starts out strong, misplaces the melody amid some delightfully surreal noodling, and finally swans away in sweet, lingering diminuendo. Almost all Pynchon's books are historical novels, with this one no exception. Where Vineland slyly set a story of Orwellian government surveillance in 1984, Bleeding Edge situates a fable of increasingly sentient computers in, naturally, 2001. Of course, the year 2001 means something besides HAL and Dave now, and Pynchon spirits us through "that terrible morning" in September--and its "infantilizing" aftermath--with unhysterical grace. Our heroine throughout is Maxine Tarnow, a defrocked fraud investigator and daftly doting Manhattan mom, still stuck in that early, "my husband...ex-husband" stage of an unwanted divorce. Maxi soon becomes embroiled in the mysterious case of one Lester Traipse, a superannuated Silicon Alley veteran who, along with the dotcom bubble, has just gotten popped. The plot's dizzying profusion of murder suspects plays like something out of early Raymond Chandler, under whose bright star Bleeding Edge unmistakably unreels. Shoals of red herrings keep swimming by, many of them never seen again. Still, reading Pynchon for plot is like reading Austen for sex. Each page has a little more of it than the one before, but you never quite get to the clincher. Luckily, Pynchon and Austen have ample recourse to the oldest, hardest-to-invoke rule in the book --when in doubt, be a genius. It's cheating, but it works. No one, but no one, rivals Pynchon's range of language, his elasticity of syntax, his signature mix of dirty jokes, dread and shining decency. It's a peculiarity of musical notation that major works are, more often than not, set in a minor key, and vice versa. Bleeding Edge is mellow, plummy, minor-key Pynchon, his second such in a row since Against the Day (2006)--that still-smoking asteroid, whose otherworldly inner music readers are just beginning to tap back at. But in its world-historical savvy, its supple feel for the joys and stings of love--both married and parental--this new book is anything but minor. On the contrary, Bleeding Edge is a chamber symphony in P major, so generous of invention it sometimes sprawls, yet so sharp it ultimately pierces. All this, plus a stripjoint called Joie de Beavre and a West Indian proctologist named Pokemon. Who else does that?David Kipen is the former director of reading initiatives at the National Endowment for the Arts and is the founder of Libros Schmibros, a nonprofit lending library and used bookstore in Los Angeles. From Booklist *Starred Review* Pynchon’s debut novel, V., appeared 50 years ago, and ever since he’s been tracking dubious covert actions and the arc and consequences of technology in novels of labyrinthine complexity, impish wit, and open-armed compassion. Of late, his inquiry has taken the form of rambunctious and penetrating crime novels. Inherent Vice (2009), currently being adapted for film, is set in 1960s Los Angeles and features a pothead PI and the launch of the digital revolution. In his latest, a hilarious, shrewd, and disquieting metaphysical mystery, Pynchon expresses love for New York City and leeriness of the seemingly boundless reach of the Internet. In spring 2001, the dot-com bubble has burst and 9/11 looms. Maxine Tarnow, a fraud investigator gone rogue, is unflappable, wise-cracking, Beretta-toting, and Jewish. Devoted to her young sons, she is embroiled in an amorphous case involving a sinister techie billionaire, diverted funds, Islamic terrorists, hip-hop-spouting Russian gangsters, a black-ops agent, a cosmic bike messenger, and a “Deep Web” virtual reality. Fearless, caustic, lightning-witted Maxine (sister to characters created by Sara Paretsky and Cynthia Ozick) instigates some of the funniest banter ever scripted. But amid the sharp hilarity of this exuberantly maze-like, pop-culture-peppered, deeply informed tale, Pynchon incisively and cuttingly broaches unanswered questions surrounding the tragedy of 9/11 and elucidates just how profoundly life has changed in its wake.HIGH-DEMAND BACKSTORY: Pynchon is a magnet for media attention and reader fervency, and this New York mystery will exert a powerful pull. --Donna Seaman From Bookforum Even as its plot grows ever more complex, Bleeding Edge is reliably entertaining as a sort of cracked Zagat’s, with entries ghostwritten by Ben Katchor. —Ed Park ***A New York Times Notable Book of 2013*** “ Brilliantly written… a joy to read… Full of verbal sass and pizzazz, as well as conspiracies within conspiracies, Bleeding Edge is totally gonzo, totally wonderful. It really is good to have Thomas Pynchon around, doing what he does best. ” — Michael Dirda, The Washington Post “A precious freak of a novel, glinting rich and strange, like a black pearl from an oyster unfathomable by any other diver into our eternal souls. If not here at the end of history, when? If not Pynchon, who? Reading Bleeding Edge , tearing up at the beauty of its sadness or the punches of its hilarity, you may realize it as the 9/11 novel you never knew you needed… a necessary novel and one that literary history has been waiting for , ever since it went to bed early on innocent Sept. 10 with a copy of The Corrections and stayed up well past midnight reading Franzen into the wee hours of his novel’s publication day.” —Slate.com “Are you ready for Thomas (Screaming Comes Across the Sky) Pynchon on the subject of September 11, 2001?... Exemplary… dazzling and ludicrous… Our reward for surrendering expectations that a novel should gather in clarity, rather than disperse into molecules, isn’t anomie but delight. Pynchon himself’s a good companion, full of real affection for his people and places, even as he lampoons them for suffering the postmodern condition of being only partly real.” — Jonathan Lethem, New York Times Book Review “ Surely now Pynchon must be in line for the Nobel Prize?... Thomas Pynchon, America’s greatest novelist, has written the greatest novel about the most significant events in his country’s 21st century history. It is unequivocally a masterpiece.” — The Scotsman (UK) “ The book’s real accomplishment is to claim the last decade as Pynchon territory, a continuation of the same tensions — between freedom and captivity, momentum and entropy, meaning and chaos — through which he has framed the last half-century… As usual, Pynchon doesn’t provide answers but teases us with the hint of closure, leaving us ultimately unsure whether the signals add up to a master plot or merely a series of sinister and unfortunate events. The overall effect is one of amused frustration, of dying to find that one extra piece of information that will help make sense of this overwhelming and vaguely threatening world. It feels a lot like life.” — Wired magazine “ The New York of late 2001 was a Pynchon novel waiting to happen , in which the failures of ‘late capitalist’ speculation, in the form of the recently deflated tech bubble, meet 9/11 to form the 21st century’s Year Zero.” — New York Observer “ Pynchon's prose is irresistible. It's playful and bustling — cheesy puns rub elbows with Big Ideas.xa0 A-” — Entertainment Weekly “ Brilliant and wonderful… Bleeding Edge chronicles the birth of the now — our terrorism-obsessed, NSA-everywhere, smartphone Panopticon zeitgeist — in the crash of the towers. It connects the dots, the packets, the pixels. We are all part of this story. We are all characters in Pynchon’s mad world. Bleeding Edge is a novel about geeks, the Internet, New York and 9/11. It is funny, sad, paranoid and lyrical. It was difficult to put down. I want to read it again.” —Salon.com “ Bleeding Edge takes the messy, funny, and sad all-at-once world we live in and reflects it back to us in a way that I can only call consoling —somebody else out there gets it. No matter how crazy things became in this book, I felt safe as long as I was inside its pages. So of course as soon as I finished it, I started over again .” —Malcolm Jones, Daily Beast /Newsweek “ Bleeding Edge may be the book Thomas Pynchon was born to write .” — New York Daily News, “Page Views” “ The ingeniously whimsical, accessible story of a New York City fraud investigator who becomes entangled with some very sketchy characters as she tries to get to the bottom of a case involving a tech billionaire .” —O: The Oprah Magazine “ Showstopping …The future that [Pynchon] so precociously, disturbingly foresaw long ago now surges around us. With Bleeding Edge, he shows that he has mastered the move from the shock of the new to the shock of the now, while cushioning the blow.” —Leisl Schillinger, Barnes & Noble “ Bleeding Edge is vintage Pynchon, a louche yarn of rollicking doomism. Pynchon is the master of technology-as-metaphor . In previous books—particularly “V.” and “Gravity’s Rainbow”—there is a persistent, shadowy suggestion of an unseen system, mechanisms that underlie the perceived reality of events. And these mechanisms are often manifest in the vagaries of things like rocket science and radio broadcasting tools. In those old books, however, the obscure schema was cast as an almost magical or mystical force, but as Bleeding Edge appears, we have the real thing .”— Seattle Times “ Fabulously entertaining … Bleeding Edge is stuffed with gorgeous passages that sing their longing for all we’ve lost, in trashing the land and ourselves. But such writing is also a stirring call to arms, making clear that the history we’ll make depends on what and how we remember. As Pynchon has been reminding us for 50 years, there’s always more than one way to tell that story.” — Milwaukee Journal Sentinel “Pynchon’s Bleeding Edge is a masterpiece of post- and pre-9/11xa0paranoia.”— Las Vegas Weekly "A hilarious, shrewd, and disquieting metaphysical mystery." — Booklist (STARRED) "No one, but no one, rivals Pynchon’s range of language, his elasticity of syntax, his signature mix of dirty jokes, dread and shining decency… Bleeding Edge is a chamber symphony in P major, so generous of invention it sometimes sprawls, yet so sharp it ultimately pierces.” — Publishers Weekly "A much-anticipated return, and it’s trademark stuff: a blend of existential angst, goofy humor and broad-sweeping bad vibes." — Kirkus Reviews (STARRED) "Truly your most important reading for the fall... darkly hilarious." — Library Journal Thomas Pynchon is the author of V. , The Crying of Lot 49 , Gravity’s Rainbow , Slow Learner , Vineland, Mason & Dixon , Against the Day , Inherent Vice , and Bleeding Edge . He received the National Book Award for Gravity’s Rainbow in 1974. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. It’s the first day of spring 2001, and Maxine Tarnow, though some still have her in their system as Loeffler, is walking her boys to school. Yes maybe they’re past the age where they need an escort, maybe Maxine doesn’t want to let go just yet, it’s only a couple blocks, it’s on her way to work, she enjoys it, so? This morning, all up and down the streets, what looks like every Callery Pear tree on the Upper West Side has popped overnight into clusters of white pear blossoms. As Maxine watches, sunlight finds its way past rooflines and water tanks to the end of the block and into one particular tree, which all at once is filled with light. “Mom?” Ziggy in the usual hurry. “Yo.” “Guys, check it out, that tree?” Otis takes a minute to look. “Awesome, Mom.” “Doesn’t suck,” Zig agrees. The boys keep going, Maxine regards the tree half a minute more before catching up. At the corner, by reflex, she drifts into a pick so as to stay between them and any driver whose idea of sport is to come around the corner and run you over. Sunlight reflected from east-facing apartment windows has begun to show up in blurry patterns on the fronts of buildings across the street. Two-part buses, new on the routes, creep the crosstown blocks like giant insects. Steel shutters are being rolled up, early trucks are double-parking, guys are out with hoses cleaning off their piece of sidewalk. Unsheltered people sleep in doorways, scavengers with huge plastic sacks full of empty beer and soda cans head for the markets to cash them in, work crews wait in front of buildings for the super to show up. Runners are bouncing up and down at the curb waiting for lights to change. Cops are in coffee shops dealing with bagel deficiencies. Kids, parents, and nannies wheeled and afoot are heading in all different directions for schools in the neighborhood. Half the kids seem to be on new Razor scooters, so to the list of things to keep alert for add ambush by rolling aluminum. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • "Brilliantly written...a joy to read...
  • Bleeding Edge
  • is totally gonzo, totally wonderful. It really is good to have Thomas Pynchon around, doing what he does best." - Michael Dirda,
  • The Washington Post
  • "Exemplary...dazzling and ludicrous." - Jonathan Lethem,
  • The New York Times Book Review
  • It is 2001 in New York City, in the lull between the collapse of the dot-com boom and the terrible events of September 11th. Maxine Tarnow runs a fine little fraud investigation business on the Upper West Side. All is ticking over nice and normal, until she starts looking into the finances of a computer-security firm and its billionaire geek CEO. She soon finds herself mixed up with a drug runner in an art deco motorboat, a professional nose obsessed with Hitler’s aftershave, a neoliberal enforcer with footwear issues, and an array of bloggers, hackers, code monkeys, and entrepreneurs, some of whom begin to show up mysteriously dead. Foul play, of course.Will perpetrators be revealed, forget about brought to justice? Will Maxine have to take the handgun out of her purse? Will Jerry Seinfeld make an unscheduled guest appearance? Will accounts secular and karmic be brought into balance?Hey. Who wants to know?

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(321)
★★★★
25%
(268)
★★★
15%
(161)
★★
7%
(75)
23%
(246)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Sorting Things Out

[...]

Sorting Things Out (On Pynchon's Bleeding Edge)

September 14, 2013

It's here. Nine months after an Internet rumor that gestated into details ever more elusive and a glimpse of the first couple of paragraphs, Penguin Press has delivered Thomas Pynchon's Bleeding Edge, a historical romance about 9/11, the dot com bust, and New York City. Four hundred and seventy-seven pages spanning the period from March, 2001, to February, 2002, it's a Pynchon novel about a time and place most of his readers will have lived through. Yet, the events seem as far away as Malta in 1919 or Peenemunde in the 1940's. That's what Pynchon does best: show us how our memories are made to cast shadows on the fleeting and evanescent present.

And Bleeding Edge is almost certainly about the present, the here and now. Pynchon's use of the present tense throughout the novel, except for the frequent flashbacks, is reminiscent of the opening of Gravity's Rainbow--hallucinatory and ominous. The present tense turns some parts into one of those interactive text-based games from the late 1970's--unadorned and urgent. Other parts of the book read like a film treatment, a gentle nudge to some bold director. If Paul Thomas Anderson's Inherent Vice (2014) is half as popular as I expect, filmmakers take notice of Bleeding Edge. Let me suggest Mary Herron for the job. Maxine Tarnow (nee Loeffler and to be portrayed, IMHO, by Catherine Keener), Pynchon's fraud investigating heroine off the licensure grid, is as interesting as Betty Paige or Valerie Solanas and could take on Patrick Bateman, a prototypical yuppie similar to the ones encountered in Bleeding Edge, although with more homicidal tendencies.

But the present tense is not just a gimmick. Although set twelve years ago, the narrative is about the unfolding of 9/11, a portal into a new world as uncertain as the many links and urls that Maxine follows in her quest within the Deep Web. Pynchon describes the Web as the eternal present, time flattened, measured, if at all, by clicks. After 9/11, Heidi, Maxine's Rhoda, says that everyone has been infantilized, and Maxine feels the regressive force of that tragedy on a New York City street, where she feels in a time warp. Maxine finds comfort in recognizing her surroundings as what had to be "the present" and "the normal." The present of the Bleeding Edge may be shell shock or the desire to set to zero the delta-t's Pynchon wrote earnestly about once.

Quests for Pynchon have always been about sorting things out. Maxine searches for answers both before and after 9/11. The tease is whether the quest changes with the attacks. For those who poo-poo conspiracies and paranoia, the fall of the towers may have been a wake-up call. Or it may have been a random event not connected to broader plots or schemes. We are reminded early on about another 9/11, in Chile, 1973, when the CIA assassinated Allende. While the connectedness of all history into plot is presented in bold operatic style in Gravity's Rainbow, the tensions are given a more human scale in Bleeding Edge. How to make sense of things? Does the explanation for the Event explain everything? Or is it just one of the many mysteries, mundane and quotidian?

Maxwell's Demon is a metaphor that appears in The Crying of Lot 49 explicitly, but also pervades all of Pynchon's work. Imagine a box filled with particles of gas moving at different speeds. Partition the box and place a trap door on the partition. Maxwell's Demon stands guard at the door, letting particles of certain speed go through while slower particles stay behind. Eventually the particles are sorted out into high speed, high temperature ones and low speed, low temperature ones. The entropy in the box has decreased without any work on the part of the Demon except for the mental work of sorting. Magically, the Demon defies the Second Law of Thermodynamics by allowing less disorder with no expenditure of energy.

Sorting things out is what folks in Pynchon novels do whether it is Oedipa uncovering the layers of America long hidden, Mason & Dixon drawing their line, Prairie Wheeler figuring out the Sixties, the Webb Children negotiating different vectors of capitalism, Doc discovering where all the sex, drugs and rock& roll went. Bleeding Edge is no different. We follow Maxine, a forensic accountant, as she examines balance sheets, web sites, financial records, in order to detect fraud and thereby find the truth. Conspiracies permeate the novel both before and after the Event, and when it occurs, it is depicted quietly but powerfully. Bleeding edge technology is one that is so untried and untested that no one knows where it might take us. Characters in Pynchon's historic romance walk the bleeding edge to an uncertain and perhaps unreachable future. They are, like the readers who take them in and define them, caught in a present sorting out the enveloping experiences.

All of which might suggest that the book has no resolutions and leaves the reader hanging. That would be a mistake. At least this reader found the process of sorting things out envigorating and moving. As readers we are not trapped in an eternal present, and Maxine and her host of comrades are moving inexorably to where we are now.

The novel begins and ends with the maternal act of tending after children. But Maxine's maternalism shifts through the novel. The conclusion is not so much about children flying the nest as about parents' guarding at a distance. One thinks about the mantra "Keep cool, but care" from V. In Bleeding Edge, that shibboleth might be "Keep distant, but help," a lesson somewhat more affirmative, more active than the earlier renunciation. Towards the end of the novel, Maxine expresses her concerns about her sons to her father: "I don't want to see them turn into their classmates, cynical smart-mouthed little bastards--but what if Ziggy and Otis start caring too much, Pop, this world, it could destroy them so easily." And as she wondered, I thought back to an earlier scene in which Maxine watches the firefighters clean up the rubble at "Ground Zero" and wonder what drives them to work as selflessly as they do. Is it possible for someone to care too much?

The novel begins with a great joke at Pynchon's expense. He describes the philosophy of a fictional Otto Kugelblitz, an errant student of Freud. Kugelblitz posits four stages for human development: the solipsism of youth, the sexual hysteria of adolescence and young adulthood, the paranoia of middle life, and the dementia of late life. These four stages culminate in death, the only form of sanity. Is Pynchon mapping his own trajectory? The truth is Pynchon in his novels seems to go through all four stages at the same time: the solipsism of the narrative voice, the erotic fetishes and urges of his characters, the ever-present and overplayed paranoia, and the demented propensities for bad puns and critical jabs. Singling up the four stages is the search for meaning and the realization that the mental quest pales before actual human contact, emotion, and connection.

Gravity's Rainbow ended in fragments as the grand paranoid schemes gave way to counterforces. The five novels after Gravity's Rainbow present different responses to the ubiquitous and oppressive System: family in Vineland, work and engagement in Mason & Dixon, social participation in Against the Day, clarity of purpose in Inherent Vice, and now simple, pure love and caring in Bleeding Edge. We have the joy to see how Pynchon tries to sort things out through the various worlds that he lovingly and carefully projects for us. Polymath as Pynchon is called, there is no pretense to have all or any answers, but his imagination has shown us possibilities that transcend labels like post-modern, or realist, or minimalist, or even historical romance.

`Now, everybody--'
.
84 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Hooray for Pynchon

I really enjoyed this book. I read it right after finishing Against The Day. I feel that there are very few authors today who write as well as Pynchon. He uses metaphor beautifully, which few writers today do. This book contains a few of his wonderful long wild Faulkner-Kerouac-Coltraneish sentences (check out pages 311-312 in the hardcover edition)and great place descriptions. I wonder if "DeepArcher" is not in part an allusion to Lew Archer, the (anti) hero of Ross MacDonald's wonderful series of detective novels. I think that maybe this book needs to be approached as you approach those novels- not all of the plot twists themselves are so important, rather they serve as a frame for mood, description, language and characterization. (Here I need to give a plug to "The Doomsters" and "Black Money", in my opinion MacDonald's greatest books and a must reads for anyone interested in American literature.)I disagree with those who say that Pynchon's writing has not evolved. His early work saw characters as confluences of historical forces which I feel made his work kind of "chilly", however beginning with "Vineland" he still places his characters in a historical context but there is more of a traditional sense of characterization, I think. Maxine is a fully drawn, living character. I feel that this lends more depth and warmth to his work. Finally, as one who was living in the New York City area on 9/11, I feel that I can say that Pynchon's description of that time is completely accurate and describes the tragedy of that time in a very real, non-sensationalized way.
47 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

"New York is the enigmatic suspect who knows the real story but isn't going to tell it."

It is circa 2001, and Thomas Pynchon is not going to tell us the story in any straight forward fashion either. Maxine runs a fraud investigating agency called Tail 'Em and Nail 'Em. As we follow Maxine we encounter that borderline fantasy of the real world in which Pynchon excels. She is a Jewish mother preoccupied with her family and submerged in the burgeoning world of the birth of potentially sentient computers. Google has not yet gone public and Microsoft rules the home computer. Of course there is a murder, and there are labyrinthine paths to its solution.

This plot is intriguing to the point of enmeshment, although not necessarily in the customary linear fashion. To be cliched, the voyage is the vital component. For me the enchantment is Maxine and her familiar but so esoteric world. And do not forget the language. The almost throw away bursts of brilliant commentary are a treat for any lover of the written world. The school which her son attends is based on a theory in which"each grade level would be regarded as a different kind of mental condition and managed accordingly. A loony bin with homework, basically." I have to love that paragraph, and Pynchon's book overflows with them.

This is a book lover's dream; a dance with plot and syntax that I am so pleased to have read.
45 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Eternal September

Readers who may have put aside or put off Pynchon might begin here, and then drift backwards into his back catalog. He combines casual commentary on mores with clever asides about first-person mom-approved shooter games, nasal forensics, IKEA, foot fetishes, and a strip club named Joie de Beavre. He movingly evokes a Jersey landfill and uptown Halloween. His rapid-fire patter playfully taps into how we talk and think, encouraging reflection, as well as reaction. This story begins the first day of spring, 2001.

Manhattan during an "Eternal September" season lasting from spring to fall foreshadows what we know follows. Decertified, now rogue, fraud examiner Maxine Tarnow investigates bookkeeping by hashslingrz. Claiming to be a computer security firm, it's a shadowy entity exerting pull over dot.commers. Maxine chats up a few, hustlers for venture capital after the recent start-up downturn. A similar protagonist enlivens Inherent Vice (also reviewed; I reviewed an advance copy of BE): a gumshoe guides us, an everyday sort pursues corruption.

But Maxine's not the caricature Doc Sportello was. Maxine's ambitions to uncover the truth, as with Sportello's, spark the presiding spirit of each cusp of a new decade. Dreamers burst into a scene, eager to improve it. Con artists and charlatans rush past. Cynical tycoons jostle for power. It's a new take on the old threat--the corporate and banker "jocks" push aside the idealistic "nerds"--as Doc found on the West Coast, Maxine will back East.

Amidst a divorce from her ex-, she can arrive at the office to open her stash of Pinot E-Grigio. Tipped off by contact Reg Despard about hashslingrz, Maxine jumps at the chance to expose them. Is she afraid? "Not me, paranoia's the garlic in life's kitchen, right, you can never have too much?" Like many characters, not limited to her hapless pal Vryva McElmo (a trademark Pynchonism, these satirical names) from California, Maxine has a tic of raising the inflection of her voice within many sentences.

Pynchon notices East Coast-West Coast markers; after three novels set largely along the Pacific, this move from Silicon Valley to Silicon Alley demonstrates his knack at blending regionalisms into his America, a place nearly but not yet homogenized. At the "bleeding edge", Stanford hackers capitalize on a program that erases its entry points in a chain of packets. "No proven use, high-risk, something only early-adoption addicts feel comfortable with." By the millennium, as in so many boom times, the pioneers have staked the best cyber claims.

These pioneers design "a virtual sanctuary to escape from the many varieties of real world discomfort. A grand-scale model for the afflicted, a destination reachable by virtual midnight express from anyplace with a keyboard." The result, "DeepArcher," offers wired departure.

But it's not smooth sailing. In one prescient glimpse, TWA Flight 800, blown out of the 1996 sky over Long Island Sound, suggests a currently simmering conspiracy at the nearby Montauk Project. Not all such government schemes are "warm and comforting", where our wish to see bad guys get theirs comes to pass. So warns March Kelleher. Her son-in-law, billionaire Gabriel Ice, runs hashslingrz. She hints to Maxine: "If you were doing something in secret and didn't want the attention, what better way to have it ridiculed and dismissed than bring in a few Californian elements?"

Naturally, such a mystery means that fewer plot points can be divulged from about halfway into a contemporary version of Bluebeard's Castle. Here the heroine, despite the threat, enters a fortress, by a tunnel into the "terminal moraine". Superficially, urban myths get dismissed, as Cold War vigilance seems a dusty relic. Beneath, servers stretch. Within, servants to a new world order seek control.

"Presently they're linked and slowly descending from wee-hours Manhattan into teeming darkness, leaving the surface-Net crawlers busy overhead slithering link to link, leaving behind the banners and pop-ups and user groups and self-replicating chat rooms." What Maxine and her guides reveal shunts away from the crowds and, as with so much of Pynchon's fiction, near an abyss his protagonists seek.

Space looms, and the open space of The Crying of Lot 49, a generation later, finds Pynchon pursuing a last frontier, a domesticated locale as much as a cyber realm. Maxine races ahead of (or after) tamers who seek to subdivide it and fill it full of conformity. It's "down to where they can begin cruising among co-opted blocks of address space with cyber-thugs guarding the perimeters, spammer operation centers, video games one way or another deemed too violent or offensive or intensely beautiful for the market as currently defined..." Those last modifiers repeat Pynchon's wonder: he shares awe through his pilgrim Maxine. She's one of us.

Maxine's ties to her family and friends, keeping her sane during her pursuit, enrich the compassion in this novel. Pynchon keeps his humor abundant, but he tempers it, in this look back at our very recent national past, with serious contemplation of what we do when we log on. Ernie, her father, muses how the Internet was, as DARPAnet during the decade of Ike, "conceived in sin, the worst possible" to keep the U.S. military armed after a nuclear attack. He predicts how soon cellphones will tighten this surveillance leash around us, as "the rubes'll all be begging to wear one, handcuffs of the future".

9/11 comes and goes, with neither irony nor sentimentality. Jingoism accompanies fear as cowed Americans beg for protection. The media's Cold War context christens the devastation as "Ground Zero". Coverage controls popular reaction. "The purpose is to get people cranked up a certain way. Cranked up, scared, and helpless." Regression to the mean occurs: the security state looms. (Nobody calls the date "9/11" in this novel.) Maxine reflects how "11 September infantilized this country. It had a chance to grow up, instead it chose to default back to childhood." Maxine, looking for clues, leaves our "meatworld" behind for an interior dimension: partly mapped and coded, partly codeless. A void stretches beyond her own imagination or, perhaps, even Pynchon's own.

Bleeding Edge floats around. Pynchon likes to fill his pages with imaginary songs. Conversations yammer on, as busy meals out fill Maxine's Filofax. Her modus operandi finds her schmoozing and prodding many fellow noshers, if less exaggerated than typical Pynchon figures, still recognizably odd, or plain annoying. Reminiscent of Don DeLillo's reactions to national security and personal insecurity, the scenes when Maxine enters DeepArcher display best its promising premise. "It should be just one more teen-sociopath video game, except it's not a shooter, so far anyway, there's no story line, no details about the destination, no manual to read, no cheat list. Does anybody get extra lives? Does anybody even get this one?"

Open-source expanses beckon, as if William Gibson's wired, arid, and wary realms re-boot for a feisty novice. Who turns out to be a Jewish mother-in-the-making rather than a cyberpunk. Then, the pace shifts as bodies blink out. True to the genre, false flags and red herrings distract us--and Maxine. Your patience may be tested, but it may be rewarded if you can handle another novel from this author famed for resisting closure. The ending (as common with Pynchon) emits not a bang but a whisper.

For fifty years, Pynchon's tales tell us, sinister or suspect specters manipulate our "meatworld". Bleeding Edge represents another (if partial) exposure of occluded, relentless, corroding forces constructing and constricting our virtual reality.
25 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

too early to say much that's really worth saying, but here are some I hope helpful if superficial comments

Update 5/19/14---By way of a preface: I recently came across a quote from the German poet Heinrich Heine, which struck me as apt to Bleeding Edge because of the concerns of some reviewers that Pynchon's later books seem to them to represent a falling off of his ability. The Heine quote comes from a fragmentary set of essays/memoirs called "Florentine Nights," which uses a framing story of visits to an invalid who is having trouble getting the sleep she needs. The narrator (more or less Heine himself) keeps her amused with the latest gossip of the places he has been and with his opinions about famous people he has met. In the quotation, he is talking about Rossini, who stopped writing operas early on in his long life (though he did continue to write piano pieces occasionally that he eventually published under the title "Sins of My Old Age"). Anyway, I think it throws an interesting light on what Pynchon is up to these days.

"An artist who has only talent feels to the end of his life the impulse to work it out; he is goaded by ambition; he feels that life is always short of perfection, and he is impelled to attain to the highest. But genius has already given us his highest possible work; he is content; he scorns the world and petty ambition, and goes home as Shakespeare did, or promenades, smiling and jesting, on the Boulevard des Italiens in Paris, like Joachim Rossini." (translation by Charles Godfrey Leland)

###

I found Bleeding Edge remarkable at first reading for a number of reasons. It catches what it's like to live in New York City---not so much in a realistic as in a somewhat exaggerated satirical way. The way people talk and act in the book is perhaps an idealized version, that is, how New Yorkers like to think of themselves, so it may appeal to us more than it apparently does to some who live elsewhere. But it isn't a false picture, and I don't believe that it is the result of Pynchon's trying to impress anyone or be clever. (Anyway, what is this animus against cleverness that you notice in a number of reviews?) Have you had the experience of getting to be friends with people, then when you first visit their home discovering that they have many of the same books on their shelves as you do? I think most New Yorkers will have something like that experience of an overlap of their own knowledge with what Pynchon knows about his city.

The book also represents a very interesting development in Pynchon's style. Jonathan Lethem in his warmly positive review, in the New York Times Book Review, noticed the youthfulness of the narrative and made the claim (mistaken, in my opinion) that except for the historical detail, this could have been written by Pynchon forty years ago. This did allow him to indulge a lovely conceit to end his review, that Pynchon is a very promising young author. I think, however, that Lethem was wrong to say that the book resists having a "late style"; it is an atypical late style, certainly, but the density and the ease of the performance strikes me as something no one could achieve without decades of experience of both writing and living. I was reminded of seeing Sonny Rollins a few years ago (I think he was in his late seventies at the time) take a solo of twenty or thirty choruses. It seems that it is possible for some artists to lose all resistance to creativity when they reach this point.

A number of the thoughtful reviews here compare the book to earlier books by Pynchon. With all due respect, I noted that there seems to be little agreement as to which of the earlier books Bleeding Edge is supposed to be better or worse than. What this says to me is that trying to place this book in relation to the others may be even more beside the point than it is with most authors. There are certain mannerisms that you find in all Thomas Pynchon's books (a love of lists, silly songs, cutesy names and spelling---"sez," for example; more positively, his musical images are never embarrassing to a musician, unlike those of many word people).

But one of the things that make Pynchon stand out is how different each book is from all the others, in part because he often writes *as if* in a genre. While he will devote varying levels of energy to the maintenance of a genre, it appears that some readers are misled, for the complaints about this book and Pynchon's writing in general often stem from readers bringing expectations to the books that are not satisfied. Bleeding Edge is not a detective novel any more than Mason & Dixon is a historical novel. Other complaints are based on what I believe is a mistaken idea of why you read a novel at all. As my reference to Sonny Rollins implied, Pynchon's writing can be thought of as a kind of verbal jazz. (You don't listen to Rollins to be philosophically challenged or to become more knowledgable or more wise, do you?) In the course of reading, you might learn a lot, you might be led to think deeply; but that is not why you do it.

I sincerely regret having to spell it out so baldly, but it seems that quite a few readers just don't get this: If you demand that a book end with the plot tied up neatly, you are bound to be disappointed, because one of Pynchon's themes is that this is impossible; it is a corollary of his theme that you can't know anything for sure. In Bleeding Edge, a governing image is the computer game DeepArcher (a kind of weird Second Life), in which it is impossible to retrace your steps---like life, right? but also, more frighteningly, like our contemporary mediated consciousness, which looks more and more like universal amnesia. Pynchon's books are also like life in that they never have neat endings (the plots often dissolve), but they all have *satisfying* endings.

As to whether this is a "9/11 novel," you shouldn't dismiss the idea because the destruction of the World Trade Center plays a relatively minor role in the story. If you don't live in NYC, you may have a media-distorted sense of how the tragedy felt in the City. I think the book captures how quickly the whole thing retreated into the background---not forgotten, and with many lingering effects, but not present in a way that was so susceptible to manipulation outside the City. (Giuliani may have been "America's mayor," but you won't find too many people in the City who would like to see him come back.) New York and New Yorkers absorb major disruptions (the way some skyscrapers have absorbed the impact of an airplane), and the book gets this exactly right.

All of the foregoing is quite superficial. But a book like Bleeding Edge needs more time than we are perhaps used to allowing for to have its full impact. Without any desire to make comparisons, I would point out that you can find people writing on Amazon that they just don't get Jane Austen or Henry James; that Joyce or Shakespeare are overrated (Joyce perhaps thought Shakespeare was overrated; Shaw certainly did); reading Mark Twain's autobiography, I discover that he found Middlemarch boring and Sherlock Holmes sheer claptrap. So don't be put off by the naysayers. They may have a right to their opinions, but you might find you disagree if you give yourself the chance.

Pynchon is not a spoon-feeder. You need to stay awake and make connections yourself, which is what he clearly does. If you're like that, you will find him great company.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Genius Flickers and Dies

I started reading Bleeding Edge and had to stop. Then I started up again, and stopped. I soldiered on. Ach! No one is ever going to say Pynchon is a bad writer. Bleeding edge has some good enough writing, but the whole enterprise seems dull. Yes, there's the usual Pynchon cleverness, in this case, I think, in service to itself. This novel has the gravitas of a potato chip, i.e., there's more depth in any single paragraph of Joseph Conrad. All this snappy dialogue. For what? So Pynchon can demonstrate he's cool? He's as cool as a grape. What's his purpose? What's he up to?

I went back and picked up Gravity's Rainbow, just to see if it was me, not Pynchon, whose head was taking a wrong turn. Answer: it's Pynchon. Gravity's Rainbow is as good as it was years back. The writing crackles--it's connected to something larger than Pynchon's attempt to be cool--characters are interesting, the story moves, grabs you from the get-go with that terrific opening sentence. The writing in Bleeding Edge is no better than what Stephen King produces.

Fact is, Pynchon hasn't written a good book in ages--not that he needs to. A work like Gravity's Rainbow assures him a place in the Hall of Fame. But Vineland, Mason & Dixon (at least it was funny), Against the Day, and worst of all, Inherent Vice (absolutely awful) are all sub-par. Was it Pynchon who was stalking The Strokes? I'm pretty sure it was. He should take it up again; it's a better hobby than writing. Or maybe he can find another band to chase. I recommend My Morning Jacket.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

the parts are greater than the whole

maybe it's because i lived on the upper west side for 10 years, and i was in the computer industry from the early 1980s through the years covered in the text, plus i'm jewish. i didn't believe in this book, like i did V or the crying of lot 49, or even inherent vice. there are patches of the text that are pure pynchon, and it has a sweetness to it at times -- the nicely coupled opening and closing sets. but i never for once imagined the character was actually living in the world, and it lacks the literary depth of gravity's rainbow or mason and dixon, which in opinion are both stunning works of art. i felt inherent vice could have easily been tacked on to against the day, and so this could as well. it seems to complete a historical sweep that i've never and never will have the time to work through in the entire set of pynchon's writing. andrew sarris the film critic in his auteur theory of filmmaking claimed a mediocre film by bergman is better than a great film by a director who has no real body of work. i would never ignore a book by pynchon. i was in my late teens when i picked up V. and he has defined my life in a sense by his magnificent work. i am always grateful for yet another book by pynchon, but of all his books, including vineland, i found this one the most in need of an auteur's theory. this is very accessible compared to gavity's rainbow, or even against the day, but if you haven't read pynchon at all, i would start with either inherent vice or the crying of lot 49. but his real masterpieces are gravity's rainbow, mason and dixon, V. and against the day. still, there are passages and set pieces in this that are worth the price of admission.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Terrible waste of time!!!

Trying to be hip by creating a plodding story that constantly side tracks with impossible characters that don't drive the plot anywhere. I was excited to get this book based on a couple of reviews and Pynchon's previous work but what a let down, Dense and uninteresting filled with idiotic stereotypes would be the best way to describe it.

Really bad take on tech during the time frame of the story just adds to the misery that awaits anyone that dares try and suffer through this mess. The whole idiotic suggestion of a VR world that couldn't have existed when this was supposed to have taken place showed how poorly this story was conceived. The way it portrays "hackers/programmers/geeks" is maybe the worst I've ever read. Ugh!

Most of the time this is the sort of book I'd read in a couple of days but I think I am on week three of trying to get through this horrible waste of trees. I went to read the other Amazon reviews to see what I'm missing and I see mostly, not a thing. I've going to stop the pain and leave it unfinished!

I give up, you win horrible book!!
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointing.

I enjoyed "Gravity's Rainbow", it being the only other Pynchon book I've read, and so don't consider myself a Pynchon groupie.

Bleeding Edge bombards you immediately with pseudo-tech slang, that, if you know anything about technology, comes off as completely forced and affected. The language and terms (mis)used in the first 50 pages turned me off to the book and I haven't picked it up since. Very "meh".
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

DoubleClick, razorfish, dark fiber..

My first jobs during and after college were in silicon alley. This book, by one of my favorite authors, captures that era in frighteningly robust detail. It is a fiction, perhaps focused on what it means to love and care for people in your life. More direct than the rest of his work that I've read.

It was such a kick to read something from Pynchon detailing the time in my life when I was first getting into his writing. I'm a coder not a book reviewer, so I don't have much else to add. This book is a great quick read relative to his other work and fits in nicely as a longer version of his more detective novel works. I love the tough cookie female protagonist, never got into V I Warshowski books, but I imagine there are more than a few choice parallels.

His research on the era is staggering, from video games, cartoons, nicktoons, music, failed dot-coms, etc. perhaps you can get that all from reading back issues of wired, red herring, etc, but honestly I have no idea how he did it. I feel like he was into some of the deeper arcana of slashdot, newsgroups, etc of the day.

Fun read for sure, and I can't wait to read it again. Also fun to read on a kindle where you can look up every reference to a weird piece of pop (or not so pop) culture with a couple of taps.
8 people found this helpful