An Officer and a Spy: A Spy Thriller
An Officer and a Spy: A Spy Thriller book cover

An Officer and a Spy: A Spy Thriller

Paperback – October 28, 2014

Price
$16.00
Format
Paperback
Pages
429
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345804853
Dimensions
5.26 x 0.98 x 7.93 inches
Weight
13.6 ounces

Description

Winner of the CWA Ian Fleming Steel Dagger and the Walter Scott Prize for Historical Fictionxa0British National Book Awards—Popular Fiction Book of the Year “Outstanding . . . Finds its chilling thrills in the unlikeliest of places.” — USA Today “[A] superb historical thriller. . . . Thick with scenes of code-breaking, covert surveillance, hairsbreadth escapes and violent death.” — The Wall Street Journal “Harris has, with this novel, taken [Le Carré’s] place as the master of making documents and scraps of paper, the details of painstaking intelligence work, into drama.xa0” — The Daily Beast “[Harris] outdoes himself. The period details are pitch-perfect . . . and the action pulses with intensity.” — The Miami Herald “A gripping tale.” — The New York Times “Mesmerizing. . . . The Dreyfus affair remains astonishing, and this exceptional piece of popular fiction does it justice.” xa0 xa0 — The Washington Post “A thrilling page-turner. . . . Thick with espionage, daring and cruel turns of fate.”xa0 xa0 — New York Daily News “A crisp, fast-paced drama. . . . From one of the great scandals of the late 19th century, Harris has written a novel which is true to the facts, scrupulously so, but reads like a combination of Le Carré at his best and Conan Doyle writing about Sherlock Holmes.”xa0 xa0 — The Daily Beast “Robert Harris’s novel speaks to our times in its examination of the potential dangers of military intelligence.”xa0 xa0 — Pittsburgh Post-Gazette “A compelling narrative of state corruption. . . . While finely attuned to modern resonances of surveillance, cultural identity and patriotic loyalty, Harris stays true to the atmosphere and morals of the period.”xa0 xa0 — The Guardian (UK)“A master storyteller at the top of his game. . . . The echoes of our own time are deafening. But Harris is far too smart to labor the point. He just drives his story forward, marshalling his cast of fools and knaves, soldiers and spies, dodgy handwriting experts and discreet mistresses, to superlative effect.”xa0 xa0 — Mail on Sunday (UK)“Claustrophobically gripping. . . . Written in elegant prose reminiscent of the 19th-century historical novel, but its form is a hybrid of the contemporary thriller, the spy novella and the courtroom drama. It is persuasive and engaging on all of these levels, while providing a unique and fresh reading of the Dreyfus affair.” xa0 xa0 — The Irish Times “Instantly absorbing. . . . Great for fans of Ken Follett, John le Carré, Louis Bayard, Caleb Carr, and Martin Cruz Smith.”xa0 xa0 — Booklist (starred review)“Easily the best fictional treatment of the Dreyfus Affair. . . . Harris perfectly captures the rampant anti-Semitism that led to Dreyfus’s scapegoating.” xa0 xa0 — Publishers Weekly (starred review)“Espionage, counterespionage, a scandalous trial, a cover-up, and a man who tries to do right make this a complex and alluring thriller.”xa0 xa0 — Kirkus Reviews Robert Harris is the author of eight bestselling novels: Fatherland, Enigma, Archangel, Pompeii, Imperium, The Ghost Writer, Conspirata, and The Fear Index . Several of his books have been adapted to film, most recently The Ghost Writer . Harris’s work has been translated into thirty-seven languages. He lives in the village of Kintbury, West Berkshire, with his wife, Gill Hornby. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1Major Picquart to see the Minister of War . . .”The sentry on the rue Saint-Dominique steps out of his box to open the gate and I run through a whirl of snow across the windy courtyard into the warm lobby of the hôtel de Brienne, where a sleek young captain of the Republican Guard rises to salute me. I repeat, with greater urgency: “Major Picquart to see the Minister of War . . . !”We march in step, the captain leading, over the black-and-white marble of the minister’s official residence, up the curving staircase, past suits of silver armour from the time of Louis the Sun King, past that atrocious piece of Imperial kitsch, David’s Napoleon Crossing the Alps at the Col du Grand-Saint-Bernard, until we reach the first floor, where we halt beside a window overlooking the grounds and the captain goes off to announce my arrival, leaving me alone for a few moments to contemplate something rare and beautiful: a garden made silent by snow in the centre of a city on a winter’s morning. Even the yellow electric lights in the War Ministry, shimmering through the gauzy trees, have a quality of magic.“General Mercier is waiting for you, Major.”The minister’s office is huge and ornately panelled in duck-egg blue, with a double balcony over the whitened lawn. Two elderly men in black uniforms, the most senior officers in the Ministry of War, stand warming the backs of their legs against the open fire. One is General Raoul le Mouton de Boisdeffre, Chief of the General Staff, expert in all things Russian, architect of our burgeoning alliance with the new tsar, who has spent so much time with the Imperial court he has begun to look like a stiff-whiskered Russian count. The other, slightly older at sixty, is his superior: the Minister of War himself, General Auguste Mercier.I march to the middle of the carpet and salute.Mercier has an oddly creased and immobile face, like a leather mask. Occasionally I have the odd illusion that another man is watching me through its narrow eye-slits. He says in his quiet voice, “Well, Major Picquart, that didn’t take long. What time did it finish?”“Half an hour ago, General.”“So it really is all over?”I nod. “It’s over.”And so it begins.“Come and sit down by the fire,” orders the minister. He speaks very quietly, as he always does. He indicates a gilt chair. “Pull it up. Take off your coat. Tell us everything that happened.”He sits poised in expectation on the edge of his seat: his body bent forwards, his hands clasped, his forearms resting on his knees. Protocol has prevented him from attending the morning’s spectacle in person. He is in the position of an impresario who has missed his own show. He hungers for details: insights, observations, colour.“What was the mood on the streets first thing?”“I would say the mood was . . . expectant.”I describe how I left my apartment in the predawn darkness to walk to the École Militaire, and how the streets, to begin with at least, were unusually quiet, it being a Saturday—“The Jewish Sabbath,” Mercier interrupts me, with a faint smile—and also freezing cold. In fact, although I do not mention this, as I passed along the gloomy pavements of the rue Boissière and the avenue du Trocadéro, I began to wonder if the minister’s great production might turn out to be a flop. But then I reached the pont de l’Alma and saw the shadowy crowd pouring across the dark waters of the Seine, and that was when I realised what Mercier must have known all along: that the human impulse to watch another’s humiliation will always prove sufficient insulation against even the bitterest cold.I joined the multitude as they streamed southwards, over the river and down the avenue Bosquet—such a density of humanity that they spilled off the wooden pavements and into the street. They reminded me of a racecourse crowd—there was the same sense of shared anticipation, of the common pursuit of a classless pleasure. Newspaper vendors threaded back and forth selling the morning’s editions. An aroma of roasting chestnuts rose from the braziers on the roadside.At the bottom of the avenue I broke away and crossed over to the École Militaire, where until a year before I had served as professor of topography. The crowd streamed on past me towards the official assembly point in the place de Fontenoy. It was beginning to get light. The École rang with the sound of drums and bugles, hooves and curses, shouted orders, the tramp of boots. Each of the nine infantry regiments quartered in Paris had been ordered to send two companies to witness the ceremony, one composed of experienced men, the other of new recruits whose moral fibre, Mercier felt, would benefit by this example. As I passed through the grand salons and entered the cour Morland, they were already mustering in their thousands on the frozen mud.I have never attended a public execution, have never tasted that particular atmosphere, but I imagine it must feel something like the École did that morning. The vastness of the cour Morland provided an appropriate stage for a grand spectacle. In the distance, beyond the railings, in the semicircle of the place de Fontenoy, a great murmuring sea of pink faces stirred behind a line of black-uniformed gendarmes. Every centimetre of space was filled. People were standing on benches and on the tops of carriages and omnibuses; they were sitting in the branches of the trees; one man had even managed to scale the pinnacle of the 1870 war memorial.Mercier, drinking all this up, asks me, “So how many were present, would you estimate?”“The Préfecture of Police assured me twenty thousand.”“Really?” The minister looks less impressed than I had expected. “You know that I originally wanted to hold the ceremony at Longchamps? The racetrack has a capacity of fifty thousand.”Boisdeffre says flatteringly, “And you would have filled it, Minister, by the sound of it.”“Of course we would have filled it! But the Ministry of the Interior maintained there was risk of public disorder. Whereas I say: the greater the crowd, the stronger the lesson.”Still, twenty thousand seemed plenty to me. The noise of the crowd was subdued but ominous, like the breathing of some powerful animal, temporarily quiescent but which could turn dangerous in an instant. Just before eight, an escort of cavalry appeared, trotting along the front of the crowd, and suddenly the beast began to stir, for between the riders could be glimpsed a black prison wagon drawn by four horses. A wave of jeers swelled and rolled over it. The cortège slowed, a gate was opened, and the vehicle and its guard clattered over the cobbles into the École.As I watched it disappear into an inner courtyard, a man standing near to me said, “Observe, Major Picquart: the Romans fed Christians to the lions; we feed them Jews. That is progress, I suppose.”He was swaddled in a greatcoat with the collar turned up, a grey muffler around his throat, his cap pulled low over his eyes. I recognised him by his voice at first, and then by the way his body shook uncontrollably.I saluted. “Colonel Sandherr.”Sandherr said, “Where will you stand to watch the show?”“I haven’t thought about it.”“You’re welcome to come and join me and my men.”“That would be an honour. But first I have to check that everything is proceeding in accordance with the minister’s instructions.”“We will be over there when you have finished your duties.” He pointed across the cour Morland with a trembling hand. “You will have a good view.”My duties! I wonder, looking back, if he wasn’t being sarcastic. I walked over to the garrison office, where the prisoner was in the custody of Captain Lebrun-Renault of the Republican Guard. I had no desire to see the condemned man again. Only two years earlier he had been a student of mine in this very building. Now I had nothing to say to him; I felt nothing for him; I wished he had never been born and I wanted him gone—from Paris, from France, from Europe. A trooper went and fetched Lebrun-Renault for me. He turned out to be a big, red-faced, horsey young man, rather like a policeman. He came out and reported: “The traitor is nervous but calm. I don’t think he will kick up any trouble. The threads of his clothing have been loosened and his sword has been scored half through to ensure it breaks easily. Nothing has been left to chance. If he tries to make a speech, General Darras will give a signal and the band will strike up a tune to drown him out.”Mercier muses, “What kind of tune does one play to drown a man out, I wonder?”Boisdeffre suggests, “A sea shanty, Minister?”“That’s good,” says Mercier judiciously. But he doesn’t smile; he rarely smiles. He turns to me again. “So you watched the proceedings with Sandherr and his men. What do you make of them?”Unsure how to answer—Sandherr is a colonel, after all—I say cautiously, “A dedicated group of patriots, doing invaluable work and receiving little or no recognition.”It is a good answer. So good that perhaps my entire life—and with it the story I am about to tell—may have turned upon it. At any rate, Mercier, or the man behind the mask that is Mercier, gives me a searching look as if to check that I really mean what I say, and then nods in approval. “You’re right there, Picquart. France owes them a lot.”All six of these paragons were present that morning to witness the culmination of their work: the euphemistically named “Statistical Section” of the General Staff. I sought them out after I had finished talking with Lebrun-Renault. They stood slightly apart from everyone else in the southwest corner of the parade ground, in the lee of one of the low surrounding buildings. Sandherr had his hands in his pockets and his head down, and seemed entirely remote—“Do you remember,” interrupts the Minister of War, turning to Boisdeffre, “that they used to call Jean Sandherr ‘the handsomest man in the French Army’?”“I do remember that, Minister,” confirms the Chief of the General Staff. “It’s hard to believe it now, poor fellow.”On one side of Sandherr stood his deputy, a plump alcoholic with a face the colour of brick, taking regular nips from a gunmetal hip flask; on the other was the only member of his staff I knew by sight—the massive figure of Joseph Henry, who clapped me on the shoulder and boomed that he hoped I’d be mentioning him in my report to the minister. The two junior officers of the section, both captains, seemed colourless by comparison. There was also a civilian, a bony clerk who looked as if he seldom saw fresh air, holding a pair of opera glasses. They shifted along to make room for me and the alcoholic offered me a swig of his filthy cognac. Presently we were joined by a couple of other outsiders: a smart official from the Foreign Ministry, and that disturbing booby Colonel du Paty de Clam of the General Staff, his monocle flashing like an empty eye socket in the morning light.By now the time was drawing close and one could feel the tension tightening under that sinister pale sky. Nearly four thousand soldiers had been drawn up on parade, yet not a sound escaped them. Even the crowd was hushed. The only movement came from the edges of the cour Morland, where a few invited guests were still being shown to their places, hurrying apologetically like latecomers at a funeral. A tiny slim woman in a white fur hat and muff, carrying a frilly blue umbrella and being escorted by a tall lieutenant of the dragoons, was recognised by some of the spectators nearest the railings, and a light patter of applause, punctuated by cries of “Hurrah!” and “Bravo!,” drifted over the mud.Sandherr, looking up, grunted, “Who the devil is that?”One of the captains took the opera glasses from the clerk and trained them on the lady in furs, who was now nodding and twirling her umbrella in gracious acknowledgement to the crowd.“Well I’ll be damned if it isn’t the Divine Sarah!” He adjusted the binoculars slightly. “And that’s Rochebouet of the Twenty-eighth looking after her, the lucky devil!”Mercier sits back and caresses his white moustache. Sarah Bernhardt, appearing in his production! This is the stuff he wants from me: the artistic touch, the society gossip. Still, he pretends to be displeased. “I can’t think who would have invited an actress . . .”At ten minutes to nine, the commander of the parade, General Darras, rode out along the cobbled path into the centre of the parade ground. The general’s mount snorted and dipped her head as he pulled her up; she shuffled round in a circle, eyeing the vast multitude, pawed the hard ground once, and then stood still. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • NATIONAL BESTSELLER
  • A whistle-blower.  A witch hunt. A cover-up. Secret tribunals, out-of-control intelligence agencies, and government corruption. Welcome to 1890s Paris.
  • Alfred Dreyfus has been convicted of treason, sentenced to life imprisonment on a far-off island, and publicly stripped of his rank. Among the witnesses to his humiliation is Georges Picquart, an ambitious military officer who believes in Dreyfus's guilt as staunchly as any member of the public. But when he is promoted to head of the French counter-espionage agency, Picquart finds evidence that a spy still remains at large in the military—indicating that Dreyfus is innocent. As evidence of the most malignant deceit mounts and spirals inexorably toward the uppermost levels of government, Picquart is compelled to question not only the case against Dreyfus but also his most deeply held beliefs about his country, and about himself.
  • Winner of the Walter Scott Prize for historical fiction
  • Winner of the American Library in Paris Book Award

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(5.8K)
★★★★
25%
(4.9K)
★★★
15%
(2.9K)
★★
7%
(1.4K)
23%
(4.5K)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Excellent page turner

If you pick this book up and think you're going to put it down again, think again. A combination of spy, detective and court room genres, that actually concerns an actual historical event. It addresses the moral complexities of obeying orders, going along to benefit one's career versus taking the moral right course. In this respect the subjects explored here are timeless. What is courage even in the face of overwhelming bureaucratic and societal resistance? This novel explores these timeless, historical themes with actual historical characters that are expertly and believably fleshed out. If you've heard of the Dreyfus affair but are not sure what it was or think it was some dusty historical anomaly that has no relevance to today, think again. It is supremely relevant to today's politics. This book would make an excellent film, but read it, you won't want it to end.
27 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

This book is thought-provoking, and may lead readers to devote themselves to fighting for the rights of persecuted minorities.

This is an excellent book about the famous "Dreyfus Affair," written by a masterful author of historical fiction. The book is full of detail, and has obviously been thoroughly researched. The machinations of the French military leadership and the French government as they refuse to acknowledge the clear proofs discovered and advanced by the main character, is almost stomach-turning due to its cynicism and gross personal ambition.

On the other hand, the book is dense, focuses on what now seems to be a long distant miscarriage of justice of questionable importance in the larger scheme of things. There is also the issue of the emotions the books evokes in its reader, largely ones of fury at the indifference and corruption of the French system of "justice" of the time, and that of perhaps all times and places. Justice is something more commonly observed in the breach than the observance, and this book thoroughly rubs that fact in the reader's face, not a pleasant sensation.

Still, given the growing religious prejudice throughout the modern world, including right here at home in America, especially after the 2016 election, this book is thought-provoking, and may even lead some readers to devote themselves, as did the heroic Major Picquart, to fighting for the rights of persecuted minorities.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Historical Novelization Which Meets High Standards - A Riveting Story!

Because I read a lot of history, fictionalized history is not my favorite genre. Too often the artistic license taken is so broad that it interferes with my reading. It's like dissonance of the brain or alarms clanging in the background. However, once in a while I get wind of a well-researched well-written novelized history, and then I enjoy it immensely.

"An Officer and a Spy" is in the latter camp. I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It is like a thriller. Even though I knew how the story ends, I could not put it down.

Our narrator is Major Picquart, a real person originally in military transport. In 1895, the year after Dreyfus' conviction for treason, Picquart is promoted to Colonel in the Statistical Section of the Ministry of War. The Statistical Section is the intelligence/counter intelligence arm of the War office. It is a grubby shady operation. That it can require the individual's suspension of morals morays and sense of fair play is impressed on Picquart fairly quickly, He has to sign off on the monthly reports on Dreyfus' solitary confinement on Devil's Island. The conditions in which the prisoner is held are grotesquely cruel. Picquart writes, "Gradually over the winter I discern that we do in fact have a policy with regard to Dreyfus, it has simply never been explained to me in so many words, either verbally or on paper. We are waiting for him to die."

The true story of how Picquart uncovers evidence of Dreyfus' innocence is interesting. The true story of how Picquart is pole-axed to find out that the army has no intention of admitting it made a mistake is dismaying. The story of how Picquart discovers the true traitor is riveting. The trials at the end, where the army actually helps the real traitor get an acquittal in exchange for helping them frame Picquart as Dreyfus' confederate, again, only to keep from admitting its mistake with Dreyfus, had me near foaming at the mouth. That invoking the name Dreyfus Affair now means an excruciating miscarriage of justice is no sleight of hand. This is an extraordinary tale from start to finish.

Robert Harris does an excellent job of marshaling a lot of dates and data into a story that has only a few places where it gets a bit bogged down in detail. His characterizations are rich, "Gribelin is an enigma to me: the epitome of the servile bureaucrat; an animated corpse. He could be any age between forty and sixty and is as thin as a wraith of black smoke, the only colour he wears. Mostly he closets himself alone upstairs in his archive; on the rare occasions he does appear he creeps along close to the wall, dark and silent as a shadow. I could imagine him slipping around the edge of a closed door, or sliding beneath it."

Before the denouement, for his refusal to let go, to shut up, to not bend, Picquart is cashiered from the army and those closest to him are harassed: "For the first time in my life I carry hatred inside me. It is an almost physical thing, like a concealed knife. Sometimes, when I am alone, I like to take it out and run my thumb along its cold, sharp blade."

Robert Harris admits that he opted to make small additions/alterations to the real plot keep the flow of his fictional story. But overall, he stuck very much to the truth. In particular, the named people are real people. I haven't read anything else by Harris, but I'll have to put him on my "newly discovered" list and see if I appreciate another of his works.

I very much enjoyed "An Officer and a Spy" and recommend it!

Happy Reader
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Suberp historical fiction or is it?

I have long wanted to understand the furor over the Dreyfus Affair. I was aware of very little and yearned for an in depth understanding. Robert Harris has brought to life this saga in the form of a novel. Hence I had the pleasure of reading a meticulously researched account but in the form of a novel which made me think of the very old television show "You are there". I was totally engrossed and immersed into 1890 France. The story is told in the first person by the leading protagonist Major Georges Picquart whose courage, principled stance and integrity, ultimately after years of imprisonment and degradation led to the exoneration of both Dreyfus and Picquart.
Picquart, though flawed and perhaps not likely to champion the cause of a Jew in those times, becomes obsessed with an injustice committed by the highest departments of the military and government. He is reluctantly given a post as head of intelligence for the Army and, as a result, stirs up a hornet's nest when he discovers that Dreyfus had to have been innocent, and that the High Command would rather a true spy and traitor remain free than risk humiliation to the Army High Command. The conspiracy to keep the truth hidden, the crimes committed to do so, the virulent anti-Semitism, and the blasé-indifferent attitude of the Army Minister and generals is appalling. Ironically, the conspiracy to shield the honor of the Army from stain and humiliation ultimately ends in failure. Why would the conspirators do such a thing? Apparently a humiliating lost war to the Prussian Army in 1870 caused a paranoia amongst the hierarchy of the Army that led to a bunker mentality. Lower level soldiers were also willing to follow whatever orders they received to shield their jobs and their superiors. So, if it meant finding a scapegoat for the weaknesses within the French Army, a "regular Jew" was a convenient target. The characters are vividly drawn as is the description of the city and countryside. I felt like I was in a play with staging. Just a marvelous job. This was so gratifying to read and appreciate. I didn't want it to end. Thank you Mr. Harris for a wonderful history lesson.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Check the book when you purchase it and make sure you have pages 48 - 90

The story and the writing are fine. The problem is that pages 49 - 80 are missing in my copy, and other reviewers are noting the same defect. So if you must purchase this particular publishing, make sure to check the pages promptly upon receipt, because the window for returns is 30 days.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

fact based fiction

"Oh what a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive". The Dreyfus Affair combined anti-Semitism with political intrigue in late 19th century France. Through the eyes of a young, ambitious, and painfully ethical and honest French military officer the author takes the facts around this gross miscarriage of justice in the French military and spins a compelling and complicated tale from the first page to the last. Enjoy this fast paced well written novel. It's learning history the easy way.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Curiously flat and unsatisfying

‘Fatherland’ and ‘Archangel’ are great books. They take history, give it a twist, and look at what might have happened if . . . .

‘An Officer and a Spy’ is not great. It’s okay, but there are a number of problems with the book. First, Robert Harris has chosen to use the first person point of view throughout rather than the third person POV in which both ‘Fatherland’ and ‘Archangel’ are written. The advantage of the third person POV is that it’s possible to cut back and forth between various points of view. The author can show the good guys innocently picking daisies while the bad guys sneak up on them . . . thus generating suspense and tension. With the first person POV the reader can only see what the narrator sees. This confines the book to one long list of “this happened, and then that happened, and then the other thing happened.” There’s very little suspense or tension in such a laundry list of events, and thus a book with a first person POV is much more difficult to make exciting.

Second, the Dreyfus affair is puzzling, particularly to 21st century Americans. The affair – the initial court martial of Dreyfus, the subsequent court martial (and acquittal) of Esterhazy, the second court martial (and second conviction) of Dreyfus – convulsed France and (arguably) was a significant factor in Clemenceau subsequently becoming Prime Minister. The problem is why? From the distance of a hundred years it’s not at all clear why the affair so polarized France. Why were the higher officers of the French Army so insistent on upholding Dreyfus’s guilt? Why did they persist in the face of evidence that they were wrong, and had convicted an innocent man? Why were they so strongly supported by a major part of the population? Why were they so strongly opposed by another faction of the population? To say it was all anti-Semitism is – I suspect – too simplistic an answer. There must have been something about the times, the atmosphere in France, the world situation . . . something that accounts for what happened.

Unfortunately, Harris has not managed to explain what this je ne sais quoi might be. I suspect that future generations may have the same difficulty understanding the Watergate Affair. Why would a sitting president descend to something as tawdry as burglary? Why, when the burglary was discovered . . . but never mind. I suspect both matters are akin to what Barbara Tuchman discussed in ‘The March of Folly.’ At odd moments, governments seem to take leave of their senses and to pursue policies that can only end in ruin – but nevertheless they press on.

In the end, ‘An Officer and a Spy’ gets all the details of the Dreyfus affair right – every iota of who did what to whom and when – but ends up feeling curiously flat and unsatisfying.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

the army went to outrageous lengths to fabricate a stronger case against the poor captain. After a few years Picquart himself be

Thriller-writer Robert Harris sets out to remind us of the infamous travesty of justice that was the Dreyfus Case in 1890s France. His central character is not Dreyfus but (real-life) army officer Georges Picquart who helped to make the flimsy case against Alfred Dreyfus on charges of espionage and witnessed the Jewish captain's trial and then his degradation in front of a baying crowd. Picquart reads the heavily censored letters exchanged between Dreyfus, imprisoned in solitary confinement on Devil's Island, and his wife. Dreyfus continues to protest his total innocence. Now working in military intelligence and on the trail of another spy in the army, Picquart comes to realise that Dreyfus was indeed innocent, but his superiors are not keen to see the case re-opened or even to see a further conviction. After an initial rush to misjudgement by one inept general, the army went to outrageous lengths to fabricate a stronger case against the poor captain. After a few years Picquart himself becomes a victim of injustice.

Real-life espionage is not conducted at the pace of a James Bond or Jason Bourne adventure, but at a snail's pace - something we already know from following the career of MI5 spymaster George Smiley. AN OFFICER AND A SPY is short on thrills and long on detail: it requires serious concentration from the reader. The tension begins to build two-thirds of the way through, when the first of the re-trials takes place. There's some anachronistic language: 'lowlife' doesn't sound right for 1890. That apart, Harris generally writes with an elegance that rivals Le Carre, although he has chosen to write this book in the present tense, a device that has put me off reading Hilary Mantel's Cromwell novels and which I found somewhat off-putting here. Still, I must concede that Robert Harris has brilliantly reconstructed a fascinating piece of history. And, as we see in the news every day, justice continues to be applied with a very uneven hand by regimes that we would like to call civilised as well as by those that we know to be barbarous.
[Reviewer is the author of THE BEXHILL MISSILE CRISIS]
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Missing pages - 8.2% of the book!

Great story. Unfortunately, in the middle of the most important court scene I became utterly lost. It turns out it wasn’t my comprehension, rather the fact that pages 337-368 were missing. To Amazon’s credit, they have refunded my purchase even though I am WAY outside of return window. Book is currently the same price so I’ve reordered and will be happy.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Two Stars

too wordy
1 people found this helpful